![cover image](https://wikiwandv2-19431.kxcdn.com/_next/image?url=https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/c/cf/CIBC_logo.svg/640px-CIBC_logo.svg.png&w=640&q=50)
CIBC Mortgages plc v Pitt
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
CIBC Mortgages plc v Pitt [1993] UKHL 7 (21 October 1993) is a decision of the House of Lords relating to undue influence.[1] The decision confirmed that a person did not need to suffer "manifest disadvantage" under a transaction in order to challenge it for actual undue influence (as opposed to "presumed" undue influence).[2][3]
Quick Facts CIBC Mortgages plc v Pitt, Court ...
CIBC Mortgages plc v Pitt | |
---|---|
![]() | |
Court | House of Lords |
Full case name | CIBC Mortgages plc v Pitt and Another |
Decided | 21 October 1993 |
Citation | [1994] 1 AC 200, [1993] 3 WLR 802, [1993] 4 All ER 433, [1993] UKHL 7 |
Transcript | BAILII transcript |
Court membership | |
Judges sitting | Lord Browne-Wilkinson, Lord Templeman, Lord Woolf, Lord Slynne of Hadley, Lord Lowry |
Case opinions | |
Decision by | Lord Browne-Wilkinson |
Keywords | |
undue influence |
Close