Binary prefix

This article is about powers-of-two prefixes for measurement units like bit and byte. For notations for the radix of a numeral, see Integer literal § Affixes.

"Gibi" redirects here. For other uses, see Gibi (disambiguation).

A binary prefix is a unit prefix that indicates a multiple of a unit of measurement by an integer power of two. The most commonly used binary prefixes are kibi (symbol Ki, meaning 2¹⁰ = 1024), mebi (Mi, 2²⁰ = 1048576), and gibi (Gi, 2³⁰ = 1073741824). They are most often used in information technology as multipliers of bit and byte, when expressing the capacity of storage devices or the size of computer files.

Decimal Value SI 1000 103 k kilo 10002 106 M mega 10003 109 G giga 10004 1012 T tera 10005 1015 P peta 10006 1018 E exa 10007 1021 Z zetta 10008 1024 Y yotta 10009 1027 R ronna 100010 1030 Q quetta	Binary Value IEC JEDEC 1024 210 Ki kibi K kilo 10242 220 Mi mebi M mega 10243 230 Gi gibi G giga 10244 240 Ti tebi T tera 10245 250 Pi pebi — 10246 260 Ei exbi — 10247 270 Zi zebi — 10248 280 Yi yobi — — —
v t e

The binary prefixes "kibi", "mebi", etc. were defined in 1999 by the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC), in the IEC 60027-2 standard (Amendment 2). They were meant to replace the metric (SI) decimal power prefixes, such as "kilo" (k, 10³ = 1000), "mega" (M, 10⁶ = 1000000) and "giga" (G, 10⁹ = 1000000000),^[1] that were commonly used in the computer industry to indicate the nearest powers of two. For example, a memory module whose capacity was specified by the manufacturer as "2 megabytes" or "2 MB" would hold 2 × 2²⁰ = 2097152 bytes, instead of 2 × 10⁶ = 2000000.

On the other hand, a hard disk whose capacity is specified by the manufacturer as "10 gigabytes" or "10 GB", holds 10 × 10⁹ = 10000000000 bytes, or a little more than that, but less than 10 × 2³⁰ = 10737418240 and a file whose size is listed as "2.3 GB" may have a size closer to 2.3 × 2³⁰ ≈ 2470000000 or to 2.3 × 10⁹ = 2300000000, depending on the program or operating system providing that measurement. This kind of ambiguity is often confusing to computer system users and has resulted in lawsuits.^[2][3] The IEC 60027-2 binary prefixes have been incorporated in the ISO/IEC 80000 standard and are supported by other standards bodies, including the BIPM, which defines the SI system,^[1]: p.121 the US NIST,^[4][5] and the European Union.

Prior to the 1999 IEC standard, some industry organizations, such as the Joint Electron Device Engineering Council (JEDEC), attempted to redefine^{[citation needed]} the terms kilobyte, megabyte, and gigabyte, and the corresponding symbols KB, MB, and GB in the binary sense, for use in storage capacity measurements. However, other computer industry sectors (such as magnetic storage) continued using those same terms and symbols with the decimal meaning. Since then, the major standards organizations have expressly disapproved the use of SI prefixes to denote binary multiples, and recommended or mandated the use of the IEC prefixes for that purpose, but the use of SI prefixes in this sense has persisted in some fields.

Definitions

Specific units of IEC 60027-2 A.2 and ISO/IEC 80000:13-2008

IEC prefix		Representations
Name	Symbol	Base 2	Base 1024	Value	Base 10
kibi	Ki	210	10241	1024	= 1.024×103
mebi	Mi	220	10242	1048576	≈ 1.049×106
gibi	Gi	230	10243	1073741824	≈ 1.074×109
tebi	Ti	240	10244	1099511627776	≈ 1.100×1012
pebi	Pi	250	10245	1125899906842624	≈ 1.126×1015
exbi	Ei	260	10246	1152921504606846976	≈ 1.153×1018
zebi	Zi	270	10247	1180591620717411303424	≈ 1.181×1021
yobi	Yi	280	10248	1208925819614629174706176	≈ 1.209×1024

In 2022, the International Bureau of Weights and Measures (BIPM) adopted the decimal prefixes ronna for 1000⁹ and quetta for 1000¹⁰.^[6][7] In analogy to the existing binary prefixes, a consultation paper of the International Committee for Weights and Measures' Consultative Committee for Units (CCU) suggested the prefixes robi (Ri, 1024⁹) and quebi (Qi, 1024¹⁰) for their binary counterparts,^[8] but as of 2022^[update], no corresponding binary prefixes have been adopted.^[9]

Comparison of binary and decimal prefixes

The relative difference between the values in the binary and decimal interpretations increases, when using the SI prefixes as the base, from 2.4% for kilo to nearly 27% for the quetta prefix. Although the prefixes ronna and quetta have been defined, as of 2022 no names have been officially assigned to the corresponding binary prefixes.

Prefix		Binary ÷ Decimal		Decimal ÷ Binary
kilo	kibi	1.024 (+2.4%)		0.9766 (−2.3%)
mega	mebi	1.049 (+4.9%)		0.9537 (−4.6%)
giga	gibi	1.074 (+7.4%)		0.9313 (−6.9%)
tera	tebi	1.100 (+10.0%)		0.9095 (−9.1%)
peta	pebi	1.126 (+12.6%)		0.8882 (−11.2%)
exa	exbi	1.153 (+15.3%)		0.8674 (−13.3%)
zetta	zebi	1.181 (+18.1%)		0.8470 (−15.3%)
yotta	yobi	1.209 (+20.9%)		0.8272 (−17.3%)
ronna	—	1.238 (+23.8%)		0.8078 (−19.2%)
quetta	—	1.268 (+26.8%)		0.7889 (−21.1%)

History

See also: Timeline of binary prefixes

Early prefixes

The original metric system adopted by France in 1795 included two binary prefixes named double- (2×) and demi- (⁠1/2⁠×).^[10] However, these were not retained when the SI prefixes were internationally adopted by the 11th CGPM conference in 1960.

Storage capacity

Main memory

Early computers used one of two addressing methods to access the system memory; binary (base 2) or decimal (base 10).^[11] For example, the IBM 701 (1952) used a binary methods and could address 2048 words of 36 bits each, while the IBM 702 (1953) used a decimal system, and could address ten thousand 7-bit words.

By the mid-1960s, binary addressing had become the standard architecture in most computer designs, and main memory sizes were most commonly powers of two. This is the most natural configuration for memory, as all combinations of states of their address lines map to a valid address, allowing easy aggregation into a larger block of memory with contiguous addresses.

While early documentation specified those memory sizes as exact numbers such as 4096, 8192, or 16384 units (usually words, bytes, or bits), computer professionals also started using the long-established metric system prefixes "kilo", "mega", "giga", etc., defined to be powers of 10,^[1] to mean instead the nearest powers of two; namely, 2¹⁰ = 1024, 2²⁰ = 1024², 2³⁰ = 1024³, etc.^[12][13] The corresponding metric prefix symbols ("k", "M", "G", etc.) where used with the same binary meanings.^[14][15] The symbol for 2¹⁰ = 1024 could be written either in lower case ("k")^[16][17][18] or in uppercase ("K"). The latter was often used intentionally to indicate the binary rather than decimal meaning.^[19] This convention, which could not be extended to higher powers, was widely used in the documentation of the IBM 360 (1964)^[19] and of the IBM System/370 (1972),^[20] of the CDC 7600,^[21] of the DEC PDP-11/70 (1975)^[22] and of the DEC VAX-11/780 (1977).^{[citation needed]}

In other documents, however, the metric prefixes and their symbols were used to denote powers of 10, but usually with the understanding that the values given were approximate, often truncated down. Thus, for example, a 1967 document by Control Data Corporation (CDC) abbreviated "2¹⁶ = 64 × 1024 = 65536 words" as "65K words" (rather than "64K" or "66K"),^[23] while the documentation of the HP 21MX real-time computer (1974) denoted 3 × 2¹⁶ = 192 × 1024 = 196608 as "196K" and 2²⁰ = 1048576 as "1M".^[24]

These three possible meanings of "k" and "K" ("1024", "1000", or "approximately 1000") were used loosely around the same time, sometimes by the same company. The HP 3000 business computer (1973) could have "64K", "96K", or "128K" bytes of memory.^[25] The use of SI prefixes, and the use of "K" instead of "k" remained popular in computer-related publications well into the 21st century, although the ambiguity persisted. The correct meaning was often clear from the context; for instance, in a binary-addressed computer, the true memory size had to be either a power of 2, or a small integer multiple thereof. Thus a "512 megabyte" RAM module was generally understood to have 512 × 1024² = 536870912 bytes, rather than 512000000.

Hard disks

In specifying disk drive capacities, manufacturers have always used conventional decimal SI prefixes representing powers of 10. Storage in a rotating disk drive is organized in platters and tracks whose sizes and counts are determined by mechanical engineering constraints so that the capacity of a disk drive has hardly ever been a simple multiple of a power of 2. For example, the first commercially sold disk drive, the IBM 350 (1956), had 50 physical disk platters containing a total of 50000 sectors of 100 characters each, for a total quoted capacity of 5 million characters.^[26]

Moreover, since the 1960s, many disk drives used IBM's disk format, where each track was divided into blocks of user-specified size; and the block sizes were recorded on the disk, subtracting from the usable capacity. For example, the IBM 3336 disk pack was quoted to have a 200-megabyte capacity, achieved only with a single 13030-byte block in each of its 808 × 19 tracks.

Decimal megabytes were used for disk capacity by the CDC in 1974.^[27] The Seagate ST-412,^[28] one of several types installed in the IBM PC/XT,^[29] had a capacity of 10027008 bytes when formatted as 306 × 4 tracks and 32 256-byte sectors per track, which was quoted as "10 MB".^[30] Similarly, a "300 GB" hard drive can be expected to offer only slightly more than 300×10⁹ = 300000000000, bytes, not 300 × 2³⁰ (which would be about 322×10⁹ bytes or "322 GB"). The first terabyte (SI prefix, 1000000000000 bytes) hard disk drive was introduced in 2007.^[31] Decimal prefixes were generally used by information processing publications when comparing hard disk capacities.^[32]

Some programs and operating systems, such as Microsoft Windows, still use "MB" and "GB" to denote binary prefixes even when displaying disk drive capacities and file sizes, as did Classic Mac OS. Thus, for example, the capacity of a "10 MB" (decimal "M") disk drive could be reported as "9.56 MB", and that of a "300 GB" drive as "279.4 GB". Some operating systems, such as Mac OS X,^[33] Ubuntu,^[34] and Debian,^[35] have been updated to use "MB" and "GB" to denote decimal prefixes when displaying disk drive capacities and file sizes. Some manufacturers, such as Seagate Technology, have released recommendations stating that properly-written software and documentation should specify clearly whether prefixes such as "K", "M", or "G" mean binary or decimal multipliers.^[36][37]

Floppy disks

Floppy disks used a variety of formats, and their capacities was usually specified with SI-like prefixes "K" and "M" with either decimal or binary meaning. The capacity of the disks was often specified without accounting for the internal formatting overhead, leading to more irregularities.

The early 8-inch diskette formats could contain less than a megabyte with the capacities of those devices specified in kilobytes, kilobits or megabits.^[38][39]

The 5.25-inch diskette sold with the IBM PC AT could hold 1200 × 1024 = 1228800 bytes, and thus was marketed as "1200 KB" with the binary sense of "KB".^[40] However, the capacity was also quoted "1.2 MB",^[41] which was a hybrid decimal and binary notation, since the "M" meant 1000 × 1024. The precise value was 1.2288 MB (decimal) or 1.171875 MiB (binary).

The 5.25-inch Apple Disk II had 256 bytes per sector, 13 sectors per track, 35 tracks per side, or a total capacity of 116480 bytes. It was later upgraded to 16 sectors per track, giving a total of 140 × 2¹⁰ = 143360 bytes, which was described as "140KB" using the binary sense of "K".

The most recent version of the physical hardware, the "3.5-inch diskette" cartridge, had 720 512-byte blocks (single-sided). Since two blocks comprised 1024 bytes, the capacity was quoted "360 KB", with the binary sense of "K". On the other hand, the quoted capacity of "1.44 MB" of the High Density ("HD") version was again a hybrid decimal and binary notation, since it meant 1440 pairs of 512-byte sectors, or 1440 × 2¹⁰ = 1474560 bytes. Some operating systems displayed the capacity of those disks using the binary sense of "MB", as "1.4 MB" (which would be 1.4 × 2²⁰ ≈ 1468000 bytes). User complaints forced both Apple^{[citation needed]} and Microsoft^[42] to issue support bulletins explaining the discrepancy.

Optical disks

When specifying the capacities of optical compact discs, "megabyte" and "MB" usually meant 1024² bytes. Thus a "700-MB" (or "80-minute") CD has a nominal capacity of about 700 MiB, which is approximately 730 MB (decimal).^[43]

On the other hand, capacities of other optical disc storage media like DVD, Blu-ray Disc, HD DVD and magneto-optical (MO) have been generally specified in decimal gigabytes ("GB"), that is, 1000³ bytes. In particular, a typical "4.7 GB" DVD has a nominal capacity of about 4.7×10⁹ bytes, which is about 4.38 GiB.^[44]

Tape drives and media

Tape drive and media manufacturers have generally used SI decimal prefixes to specify the maximum capacity,^[45][46] although the actual capacity would depend on the block size used when recording.

Data and clock rates

Computer clock frequencies are always quoted using SI prefixes in their decimal sense. For example, the internal clock frequency of the original IBM PC was 4.77 MHz, that is 4770000 Hz.

Similarly, digital information transfer rates are quoted using decimal prefixe. The Parallel ATA "100 MB/s" disk interface can transfer 100000000 bytes per second, and a "56 Kb/s" modem transmits 56000 bits per second. Seagate specified the sustained transfer rate of some hard disk drive models with both decimal and IEC binary prefixes.^[36] The standard sampling rate of music compact disks, quoted as 44.1 kHz, is indeed 44100 samples per second.^{[citation needed]} A "1 Gb/s" Ethernet interface can receive or transmit up to 10⁹ bits per second, or 125000000 bytes per second within each packet. A "56k" modem can encode or decode up to 56000 bits per second.

Decimal SI prefixes are also generally used for processor-memory data transfer speeds. A PCI-X bus with 66 MHz clock and 64 bits wide can transfer 66000000 64-bit words per second, or 4224000000 bit/s = 528000000 B/s, which is usually quoted as 528 MB/s. A PC3200 memory on a double data rate bus, transferring 8 bytes per cycle with a clock speed of 200 MHz has a bandwidth of 200000000 × 8 × 2 = 3200000000 B/s, which would be quoted as 3.2 GB/s.

Ambiguous standards

The ambiguous usage of the prefixes "kilo ("K" or "k"), "mega" ("M"), and "giga" ("G"), as meaning both powers of 1000 or (in computer contexts) of 1024, has been recorded in popular dictionaries,^[47][48][49] and even in some obsolete standards, such as ANSI/IEEE 1084-1986^[50] and ANSI/IEEE 1212-1991,^[51] IEEE 610.10-1994,^[52] and IEEE 100-2000.^[53] Some of these standards specifically limited the binary meaning to multiples of "byte" ("B") or "bit" ("b").

Early binary prefix proposals

Before the IEC standard, several alternative proposals existed for unique binary prefixes, starting in the late 1960s. In 1996, Markus Kuhn proposed the extra prefix "di" and the symbol suffix or subscript "2" to mean "binary"; so that, for example, "one dikilobyte" would mean "1024 bytes", denoted "K₂B" or "K2B".^[54]

In 1968, Donald Morrison proposed to use the Greek letter kappa (κ) to denote 1024, κ² to denote 1024², and so on.^[55] (At the time, memory size was small, and only K was in widespread use.) In the same year, Wallace Givens responded with a suggestion to use bK as an abbreviation for 1024 and bK2 or bK² for 1024², though he noted that neither the Greek letter nor lowercase letter b would be easy to reproduce on computer printers of the day.^[56] Bruce Alan Martin of Brookhaven National Laboratory proposed that, instead of prefixes, binary powers of two were indicated by the letter B followed by the exponent, similar to E in decimal scientific notation. Thus one would write 3B20 for 3 × 2²⁰.^[57] This convention is still used on some calculators to present binary floating point-numbers today.^[58]

In 1969, Donald Knuth, who uses decimal notation like 1 MB = 1000 kB,^[59] proposed that the powers of 1024 be designated as "large kilobytes" and "large megabytes", with abbreviations KKB and MMB.^[60]

Consumer confusion

The ambiguous meanings of "kilo", "mega", "giga", etc., has caused significant consumer confusion, especially in the personal computer era. A common source of confusion was the discrepancy between the capacities of hard drives specified by manufacturers, using those prefixes in the decimal sense, and the numbers reported by operating systems and other software, that used them in the binary sense, such as the Apple Macintosh in 1984. For example, a hard drive marketed as "1 TB" could be reported as having only "931 GB". The confusion was compounded by fact that RAM manufacturers used the binary sense too.

Legal disputes

The different interpretations of disk size prefixes led to class action lawsuits against digital storage manufacturers. These cases involved both flash memory and hard disk drives.

Early cases

Early cases (2004–2007) were settled prior to any court ruling with the manufacturers admitting no wrongdoing but agreeing to clarify the storage capacity of their products on the consumer packaging. Accordingly, many flash memory and hard disk manufacturers have disclosures on their packaging and web sites clarifying the formatted capacity of the devices or defining MB as 1 million bytes and 1 GB as 1 billion bytes.^{[61][62][63][64]}

Willem Vroegh v. Eastman Kodak Company

On 20 February 2004, Willem Vroegh filed a lawsuit against Lexar Media, Dane–Elec Memory, Fuji Photo Film USA, Eastman Kodak Company, Kingston Technology Company, Inc., Memorex Products, Inc.; PNY Technologies Inc., SanDisk Corporation, Verbatim Corporation, and Viking Interworks alleging that their descriptions of the capacity of their flash memory cards were false and misleading.

Vroegh claimed that a 256 MB Flash Memory Device had only 244 MB of accessible memory. "Plaintiffs allege that Defendants marketed the memory capacity of their products by assuming that one megabyte equals one million bytes and one gigabyte equals one billion bytes." The plaintiffs wanted the defendants to use the customary values of 1024² for megabyte and 1024³ for gigabyte. The plaintiffs acknowledged that the IEC and IEEE standards define a MB as one million bytes but stated that the industry has largely ignored the IEC standards.^[65]

The parties agreed that manufacturers could continue to use the decimal definition so long as the definition was added to the packaging and web sites.^[66] The consumers could apply for "a discount of ten percent off a future online purchase from Defendants' Online Stores Flash Memory Device".^[67]

Orin Safier v. Western Digital Corporation

On 7 July 2005, an action entitled Orin Safier v. Western Digital Corporation, et al. was filed in the Superior Court for the City and County of San Francisco, Case No. CGC-05-442812. The case was subsequently moved to the Northern District of California, Case No. 05-03353 BZ.^[68]

Although Western Digital maintained that their usage of units is consistent with "the indisputably correct industry standard for measuring and describing storage capacity", and that they "cannot be expected to reform the software industry", they agreed to settle in March 2006 with 14 June 2006 as the Final Approval hearing date.^[69]

Western Digital offered to compensate customers with a free download of backup and recovery software valued at US$30. They also paid $500000 in fees and expenses to San Francisco lawyers Adam Gutride and Seth Safier, who filed the suit. The settlement called for Western Digital to add a disclaimer to their later packaging and advertising.^[70][71][72] Western Digital had this footnote in their settlement. "Apparently, Plaintiff believes that he could sue an egg company for fraud for labeling a carton of 12 eggs a 'dozen', because some bakers would view a 'dozen' as including 13 items."^[73]

Cho v. Seagate Technology (US) Holdings, Inc.

A lawsuit (Cho v. Seagate Technology (US) Holdings, Inc., San Francisco Superior Court, Case No. CGC-06-453195) was filed against Seagate Technology, alleging that Seagate overrepresented the amount of usable storage by 7% on hard drives sold between 22 March 2001 and 26 September 2007. The case was settled without Seagate admitting wrongdoing, but agreeing to supply those purchasers with free backup software or a 5% refund on the cost of the drives.^[74]

Dinan et al. v. SanDisk LLC

On 22 January 2020, the district court of the Northern District of California ruled in favor of the defendant, SanDisk, upholding its use of "GB" to mean 1000000000 bytes.^[75]

IEC 1999 Standard

In 1995, the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry's (IUPAC) Interdivisional Committee on Nomenclature and Symbols (IDCNS) proposed the prefixes "kibi" (short for "kilobinary"), "mebi" ("megabinary"), "gibi" ("gigabinary") and "tebi" ("terabinary"), with respective symbols "kb", "Mb", "Gb" and "Tb",^[76] for binary multipliers. The proposal suggested that the SI prefixes should be used only for powers of 10; so that a disk drive capacity of "500 gigabytes", "0.5 terabytes", "500 GB", or "0.5 TB" should all mean 500×10⁹ bytes, exactly or approximately, rather than 500 × 2³⁰ (= 536870912000) or 0.5 × 2⁴⁰ (= 549755813888).

The proposal was not accepted by IUPAC at the time, but was taken up in 1996 by the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) in collaboration with the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) and International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC). The prefixes "kibi", "mebi", "gibi" and "tebi" were retained, but with the symbols "Ki" (with capital "K"), "Mi", "Gi" and "Ti" respectively.^[77]

In January 1999, the IEC published this proposal, with additional prefixes "pebi" ("Pi") and "exbi" ("Ei"), as an international standard (IEC 60027-2 Amendment 2)^[78][79][80] The standard reaffirmed the BIPM's position that the SI prefixes should always denote powers of 10. The third edition of the standard, published in 2005, added prefixes "zebi" and "yobi", thus matching all then-defined SI prefixes with binary counterparts.^[81]

The harmonized ISO/IEC IEC 80000-13:2008 standard cancels and replaces subclauses 3.8 and 3.9 of IEC 60027-2:2005 (those defining prefixes for binary multiples). The only significant change is the addition of explicit definitions for some quantities.^[82] In 2009, the prefixes kibi-, mebi-, etc. were defined by ISO 80000-1 in their own right, independently of the kibibyte, mebibyte, and so on.

The BIPM standard JCGM 200:2012 "International vocabulary of metrology – Basic and general concepts and associated terms (VIM), 3rd edition" lists the IEC binary prefixes and states "SI prefixes refer strictly to powers of 10, and should not be used for powers of 2. For example, 1 kilobit should not be used to represent 1024 bits (2¹⁰ bits), which is 1 kibibit."^[83]

The IEC 60027-2 standard recommended operating systems and other software were updated to use binary or decimal prefixes consistently, but incorrect usage of SI prefixes for binary multiples is still common. At the time, the IEEE decided that their standards would use the prefixes "kilo", etc. with their metric definitions, but allowed the binary definitions to be used in an interim period as long as such usage was explicitly pointed out on a case-by-case basis.^[84]

Other standards bodies and organizations

The IEC standard binary prefixes are supported by other standardization bodies and technical organizations.

The United States National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) supports the ISO/IEC standards for "Prefixes for binary multiples" and has a web page^[85] documenting them, describing and justifying their use. NIST suggests that in English, the first syllable of the name of the binary-multiple prefix should be pronounced in the same way as the first syllable of the name of the corresponding SI prefix, and that the second syllable should be pronounced as bee.^[5] NIST has stated the SI prefixes "refer strictly to powers of 10" and that the binary definitions "should not be used" for them.^[86]

As of 2014, the microelectronics industry standards body JEDEC describes the IEC prefixes in its online dictionary, but acknowledges that the SI prefixes and the symbols "K", "M" and "G" are still commonly used with the binary sense for memory sizes.^[87][88]

On 19 March 2005, the IEEE standard IEEE 1541-2002 ("Prefixes for Binary Multiples") was elevated to a full-use standard by the IEEE Standards Association after a two-year trial period.^[89][90] as of April 2008^[update], the IEEE Publications division does not require the use of IEC prefixes in its major magazines such as Spectrum^[91] or Computer.^[92]

The International Bureau of Weights and Measures (BIPM), which maintains the International System of Units (SI), expressly prohibits the use of SI prefixes to denote binary multiples, and recommends the use of the IEC prefixes as an alternative since units of information are not included in the SI.^[93][1]

The Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE) prohibits the use of SI prefixes with anything but a power-of-1000 meaning, but does not cite the IEC binary prefixes.^[94]

The European Committee for Electrotechnical Standardization (CENELEC) adopted the IEC-recommended binary prefixes via the harmonization document HD 60027-2:2003-03.^[95] The European Union (EU) has required the use of the IEC binary prefixes since 2007.^[96]

Current practice

The 536870912-byte capacity of these RAM modules is stated as "512 MB" on the label.

Linux GNOME's partition editor uses IEC prefixes to display partition sizes. The total capacity of the 120 × 10⁹-byte disk is displayed as "111.79 GiB".

GNOME's system monitor uses IEC prefixes to show memory size and networking data rate.

Some computer industry participants, such as Hewlett-Packard (HP),^[97] and IBM^[98][99] have adopted or recommended IEC binary prefixes as part of their general documentation policies.

As of 2023, the use of SI prefixes with the binary meanings is still prevalent for specifying the capacity of the main memory of computers, of RAM, ROM, EPROM, and EEPROM chips and memory modules, and of the cache of computer processors. For example, a "512-megabyte" or "512 MB" memory module holds 512 MiB; that is, 512 × 2²⁰ bytes, not 512 × 10⁶ bytes.^{[100][101][102][103]}

JEDEC continues to include the customary binary definitions of "kilo", "mega", and "giga" in the document Terms, Definitions, and Letter Symbols,^[104] and, as of 2010^[update], still used those definitions in their memory standards.^{[105][106][107][108][109]}

On the other hand, the SI prefixes with powers of ten meanings are generally used for the capacity of external storage units, such as disk drives,^{[110][111][112][113][114]} solid state drives, and USB flash drives,^[64] except for some flash memory chips intended to be used as EEPROMs. However, some disk manufacturers have used the IEC prefixes to avoid confusion.^[115] The decimal meaning of SI prefixes is usually also intended in measurements of data transfer rates, and clock speeds.^{[citation needed]}

Some operating systems and other software use either the IEC binary multiplier symbols ("Ki", "Mi", etc.)^{[116][117][118][119][120][121]} or the SI multiplier symbols ("k", "M", "G", etc.) with decimal meaning. Some programs, such as the Linux/GNU ls command, let the user choose between binary or decimal multipliers. However, some continue to use the SI symbols with the binary meanings, even when reporting disk or file sizes. Some programs may also use "K" instead of "k", with either meaning.^[122]

Other uses

While the binary prefixes are almost always used with the units of information, bits and bytes, they may be used with any other unit of measure, when convenient. For example, in signal processing one may need binary multiples of the frequency unit hertz (Hz), for example the kibihertz (KiHz), equal to 1024 Hz.^[123][124]

See also

• Binary engineering notation
• B notation (scientific notation)
• ISO/IEC 80000
• Nibble
• Octet

References

1. Bureau International des Poids et Mesures. (2006). "§3.1 SI prefixes" (PDF). The International System of Units (SI) (in French and English) (8th ed.). Paris: STEDI Media. p. 127. ISBN 978-92-822-2213-3. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2006-08-13. Retrieved 2007-02-25. [Side note:] These SI prefixes refer strictly to powers of 10. They should not be used to indicate powers of 2 (for example, one kilobit represents 1000 bits and not 1024 bits). The IEC has adopted prefixes for binary powers in the international standard IEC 60027-2: 2005, third edition, Letter symbols to be used in electrical technology – Part 2: Telecommunications and electronics. The names and symbols for the prefixes corresponding to 2¹⁰, 2²⁰, 2³⁰, 2⁴⁰, 2⁵⁰, and 2⁶⁰ are, respectively: kibi, Ki; mebi, Mi; gibi, Gi; tebi, Ti; pebi, Pi; and exbi, Ei. Thus, for example, one kibibyte would be written: 1 KiB = 2¹⁰ B = 1024 B, where B denotes a byte. Although these prefixes are not part of the SI, they should be used in the field of information technology to avoid the incorrect usage of the SI prefixes.
2. "Order Granting Motion to Dismiss" (PDF). United States District Court for the Northern District of California. Retrieved 2020-01-24.
3. See also Dinan v. SanDisk LLC, No. 20-15287 (9th Cir. Feb. 11, 2021) https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=16989791406584358656
4. "SI prefixes". The NIST Reference on Constants, Units, and Uncertainty: International System of Units (SI). National Institute of Standards and Technology. 2010-01-13. Retrieved 2017-04-03.
5. "International System of Units (SI): Prefixes for binary multiples". The NIST Reference on Constants, Units, and Uncertainty. National Institute of Science and Technology. Retrieved 2007-09-09.
6. "List of Resolutions for the 27th meeting of the General Conference on Weights and Measures" (PDF). 2022-11-18. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2022-11-18. Retrieved 2022-11-18.
7. Gibney, Elizabeth (2022-11-18). "How many yottabytes in a quettabyte? Extreme numbers get new names". Nature. doi:10.1038/d41586-022-03747-9. PMID 36400954. S2CID 253671538. Retrieved 2022-11-21.
8. Brown, Richard J. C. (2023) [2022-02-08, 2022-04-01, 2022-11-24]. "A further short history of the SI prefixes". Letter to the editor. Metrologia. 60 (1). BIPM & IOP Publishing Ltd: 013001. Bibcode:2023Metro..60a3001B. doi:10.1088/1681-7575/ac6afd. S2CID 253966045. 013001. (1+4 pages)
9. Brown, Richard J. C. (2022-04-27). "Reply to 'Facing a shortage of the Latin letters for the prospective new SI symbols: alternative proposal for the new SI prefixes'". Accreditation and Quality Assurance [de]. 27 (3): 143–144. doi:10.1007/s00769-022-01499-7. S2CID 248397680.
10. "La Loi Du 18 Germinal An 3: Décision de tracer le mètre, unité fondamentale, sur une règle de platine. Nomenclature des " mesures républicaines ". Reprise de la triangulation" [The Law of 18 Germinal, Year 3: Decision to draw the fundamental unit metre on a platinum ruler. Nomenclature of "Republican measures". Resumption of the triangulation.]. L'Histoire Du Mètre [The history of the metre] (in French). histoire.du.metre.free.fr. Archived from the original on 2022-11-26. Retrieved 2015-10-12. Art. 8. Dans les poids et mesures de capacité, chacune des mesures décimales de ces deux genres aura son double et sa moitié, afin de donner à la vente des divers objets toute la commodité que l'on peut désirer. Il y aura donc le double-litre et le demi-litre, le double-hectogramme et le demi-hectogramme, et ainsi des autres. [Art. 8. In the weights and measures of capacity, each of the decimal measures of these two kinds will have its double and its half, in order to give to the sale of the various articles all the convenience that one can desire. There will therefore be the double-litre and the half-litre, the double-hectogram and the half-hectogram, and so on.]
11. Weik, Martin H. (March 1961). "A Third Survey of Domestic Electronic Digital Computing Systems: Chapter III Analysis and Trends". Ballistic Research Laboratories Report No. 1115: 1027. Of 187 different relevant systems, 131 utilize a straight binary system internally, whereas 53 utilize the decimal system (primarily binary coded decimal) and 3 systems utilize a binary coded alphanumeric system of notation. This lengthy report describes many of the early computers.
12. Hunting Trouble on 28 Megacycles, A. L. Blais, QST, January 1930.
13. Lin, Yeong; Mattson, R. (September 1972). "Cost-performance evaluation of memory hierarchies". IEEE Transactions on Magnetics. 8 (3). IEEE: 390–392. Bibcode:1972ITM.....8..390L. doi:10.1109/TMAG.1972.1067329. Also, random access devices are advantageous over serial access devices for backing store applications only when the memory capacity is less than 1 Mbyte. For capacities of 4 Mbyte and 16 Mbyte serial access stores with shift register lengths of 256 bit and 1024 bit, respectively, look favorable.
14. Real, P. (September 1959). "A generalized analysis of variance program utilizing binary logic". ACM '59: Preprints of Papers Presented at the 14th National Meeting of the Association for Computing Machinery. ACM Press: 78–1–78–5. doi:10.1145/612201.612294. S2CID 14701651. On a 32K core size 704 computer, approximately 28000 data may be analyzed, ... without resorting to auxiliary tape storage. Note: the IBM 704 core memory units had 4096 36-bit words. Up to 32768 words could be installed
15. Gruenberger, Fred; Burgess, C. R.; Gruenberger, Fred (October 1960). "Letters to the Editor". Communications of the ACM. 3 (10). doi:10.1145/367415.367419. S2CID 3199685. "The 8K core stores were getting fairly common in this country in 1954. The 32K store started mass production in 1956; it is the standard now for large machines and at least 200 machines of the size (or its equivalent in the character addressable machines) are in existence today (and at least 100 were in existence in mid-1959)." Note: The IBM 1401 was a character addressable computer.
16. Ray Horak (2008). Webster's New World Telecom Dictionary. John Wiley & Sons. p. 271. ISBN 9780471774570. In computing and storage systems, a kB (kiloByte) is actually 1,024 (2^10) bytes, since the measurement is based on a base 2, or binary, number system. The term kB comes from the fact that 1,024 is nominally, or approximately, 1,000.
17. Janet S. Dodd (1997). The ACS style guide: a manual for authors and editors. American Chemical Society. p. 124. ISBN 9780841234611. kB (kilobyte; actually 1024 bytes) KB (kilobyte; kB is preferred)
18. F. J. M. Laver (1989-05-11). Information Technology: Agent of Change. Cambridge University Press. p. 35. ISBN 978-0521350358. when describing the performance of IT systems the larger units 'kilobytes' (kB) [...] Strictly speaking, k means the 'binary thousand' 1024
19. Amdahl, Gene M. (1964). "Architecture of the IBM System/360" (PDF). IBM Journal of Research and Development. 8 (2). IBM: 87–101. doi:10.1147/rd.82.0087. Figure 1 gives storage (memory) capacity ranges of the various models in "Capacity 8-bit bytes, 1 K = 1024"
20. IBM (1972). System/370 Model 158 brochure (PDF). IBM. G520-261871. All-monolithic storage ... (1024-bit NMOS) This new improvement of processor storage makes system expansion more economical. Real storage capacity is available in 512K increments ranging from 512K to 2,048K bytes.
21. Control Data Corporation (November 1968). Control Data 7600 Computer System: Preliminary System Description (PDF). One type, designated as the small core memory (SCM) is a many bank coincident current type memory with a total of 64K words of 60 bit length (K=1024).
22. Bell, Gordon (November 1975). "Computer structures: What have we learned from the PDP-11?" (PDF). ISCA '76: Proceedings of the 3rd Annual Symposium on Computer Architecture. ACM Press: 1–14. doi:10.1145/800110.803541. S2CID 14496112. memory size (8k bytes to 4 megabytes).
23. Control Data Corporation (1965–1967). Control Data 6400/6500/6600 Computer Systems Reference Manual (Pub No. 60100000 ed.). pp. 2–1. Archived from the original on 2014-01-02. Retrieved 2013-11-07. Central Memory is organized into 32K, 65K, or 131K words (60-bit) in 8, 16, or 32 banks of 4096 words each.
24. Frankenberg, Robert (October 1974). "All Semiconductor Memory Selected for New Minicomputer Series" (PDF). Hewlett-Packard Journal. 26 (2). Hewlett-Packard: 15–20. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2007-11-29. Retrieved 2007-06-18. 196K-word memory size
25. Hewlett-Packard (November 1973). "HP 3000 Configuration Guide" (PDF). HP 3000 Computer System and Subsystem Data: 59. Retrieved 2010-01-22.
26. IBM Corporation (2003-01-23). "IBM 350 disk storage unit". IBM Archives. Archived from the original on 2005-04-09.
27. The CDC Product Line Card unambiguously uses MB to characterize HDD capacity in millions of bytes
28. Seagate Corporation (April 1982). ST506/412 OEM Manual (PDF). p. 3. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2016-10-08. Retrieved 2016-09-06.
29. IBM Tells MiniScribe It Is Cutting Back On Winchester Orders, Computer System News, 1 Jan 1984, p. 1
30. Mellor, Chris (2011-04-06). "It's the oldest working Seagate drive in the UK". The Register. Retrieved 2012-01-26.
31. "Hitachi Introduces 1-Terabyte Hard Drive". PC World. 2007-01-04. Archived from the original on 2007-01-12. Retrieved 2010-02-04.
32. 1977 Disk/Trend Report – Rigid Disk Drives, published June 1977
33. "How iOS and macOS report storage capacity". Apple Support. 2018-02-27. Archived from the original on 2020-04-09. Retrieved 2022-01-09.
34. "UnitsPolicy". Ubuntu Wiki. Ubuntu. Archived from the original on 2021-11-18. Retrieved 2022-01-09.
35. "ConsistentUnitPrefixes". Debian Wiki. Archived from the original on 2021-12-03. Retrieved 2022-01-09.
36. Seagate Seag2011 10K.5 SAS Product Manual, 100628561, Rev D, March 2011, sec 5.2.3, p. 10 (18th page of the pdf), states the drive's sustained transfer speed as "89 to 160 MiB/s" on one line, and "93 to 168 MB/s" on the next line.
37. "Marketing Bulletin: Advanced Format 4K Sector Transition Frequently Asked Questions" (PDF). Seagate Technology. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2010-07-15.
38. "IBM100 – The Floppy Disk". www-03.ibm.com. 2012-03-07. Archived from the original on 2012-04-03. Retrieved 2023-10-17.
39. "Disc Storage". Datamation. May 1972. pp. 154, 162, 164. CDS 100 ... stores over 600 kilobits, Model 650 ... store 1.5 megabits ...
40. Brutman, Michael B. (2001-07-08). "Working with Disks: An intro to floppy disks and floppy drives". Brutmanlabs. Archived from the original on 2024-02-19. Retrieved 2024-02-19.
41. "Floppy disk storage | IBM". www.ibm.com. Retrieved 2024-12-14.
42. Microsoft (2003-05-06). "Determining Actual Disk Size: Why 1.44 MB Should Be 1.40 MB". Article ID: 121839. Microsoft. Retrieved 2007-07-07. "The 1.44-megabyte (MB) value associated with the 3.5-inch disk format does not represent the actual size or free space of these disks. Although its size has been popularly called 1.44 MB, the correct size is actually 1.40 MB."
43. "Data capacity of CDs". Videohelp.com. Archived from the original on 2006-07-15. Retrieved 2012-01-26.
44. Understanding Recordable and Rewritable DVD Archived 2 January 2011 at the Wayback Machine
45. ^{[permanent dead link‍]}
46. "Data Interchange on 12,7 mm 384-Track Magnetic Tape Cartridges – Ultrium-1 Format" (PDF). Ecma-international.org. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2013-09-17. Retrieved 2017-12-30.
47. "Definition of megabyte". M-w.com. Retrieved 2017-12-30.
48. "Definitions of Megabyte". Dictionary.reference.com. Retrieved 2017-12-30.
49. "AskOxford: megabyte". Askoxford.com. Archived from the original on 2005-05-25. Retrieved 2017-12-30.
50. IEEE Standard Glossary of Mathematics of Computing Terminology. 1986-10-30. doi:10.1109/IEEESTD.1986.79649. ISBN 0-7381-4541-6. kilo (K). (1) A prefix indicating 1000. (2) In statements involving size of computer storage, a prefix indicating 2¹⁰, or 1024. mega (M). (1) A prefix indicating one million. (2) In statements involving size of computer storage, a prefix indicating 2²⁰, or 1048576.
51. IEEE Standard Control and Status Register (CSR) Architecture for Microcomputer Buses. 1992-07-22. doi:10.1109/IEEESTD.1992.106981. ISBN 0-7381-4336-7. Kbyte. Kilobyte. Indicates 2¹⁰ bytes. Mbyte. Megabyte. Indicates 2²⁰bytes. Gbyte is used in the Foreword.
52. IEEE Standard Glossary of Computer Hardware Terminology. 1994-06-24. doi:10.1109/IEEESTD.1995.79522. ISBN 1-55937-492-6. gigabyte (gig, GB). This term may mean either a) 1000000000 bytes or b) 2³⁰ bytes. ... As used in this document, the terms kilobyte (kB) means 2¹⁰ or 1024 bytes, megabyte (MB) means 1024 kilobytes, and gigabyte (GB) means 1024 megabytes.
53. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (2000). 100-2000. IEEE Computer Society Press. doi:10.1109/IEEESTD.2000.322230. ISBN 978-0-7381-2601-2. "kB See kilobyte." "Kbyte Kilobyte. Indicates 2¹⁰ bytes." "Kilobyte Either 1000 or 2¹⁰ or 1024 bytes." The standard also defines megabyte and gigabyte with a note that an alternative notation for base 2 is under development.
54. Kuhn, Markus (1996-12-29). "Standardized units for use in information technology".
55. Donald R. Morrison, Sandia Corporation (March 1968). "Letters to the editor: Abbreviations for computer and memory sizes". Communications of the ACM. 11 (3): 150. doi:10.1145/362929.362962. S2CID 22934466.
56. Wallace Givens, Applied National Lab (June 1968). "Letters to the editor: proposed abbreviation for 1024: bK". Communications of the ACM. 11 (6): 391. doi:10.1145/363347.363351. S2CID 22205692.
57. Martin, Bruce Alan (October 1968). "Letters to the editor: On binary notation". Communications of the ACM. 11 (10). Associated Universities Inc.: 658. doi:10.1145/364096.364107. S2CID 28248410.
58. Schwartz, Jake; Grevelle, Rick (2003-10-20) [1993]. HP16C Emulator Library for the HP48S/SX. 1.20 (1 ed.). Retrieved 2015-08-15.
59. The Art of Computer Programming Archived 2016-03-05 at the Wayback Machine Volume 1, Donald Knuth, pp. 24 and 94
60. "Knuth: Recent News (1999)". Cs-staff.stanford.edu. Retrieved 2012-01-26.
61. "WD Caviar SE16 SATA Hard Drives". Western Digital: Products. Western Digital Corporation. Archived from the original on 2007-09-02. Retrieved 2007-09-09.
62. "Jack Flash F.A.Q." Corsair. Archived from the original on 2016-03-05. Retrieved 2014-06-20. [...] the industry-standard definition of a megabyte (MByte) for flash devices is one million (1,000,000) bytes, where the operating system uses two to the twentieth power, or 1,048,576 bytes. Similarly, for a gigabyte (GByte), the number is 1,000,000,000 and 1,073,741,824 respectively.
63. "SanDisk Ultra CompactFlash cards" (PDF). SanDisk Corporation. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2013-08-10. Retrieved 2014-06-20.
64. "Secure Digital Capacity Disclaimer" (PDF). sandisk.com. SanDisk Corporation. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2013-02-27. Retrieved 2014-06-20.
65. "Vreogh Third Amended Complaint (Case No. GCG-04-428953)" (PDF). pddocs.com. Poorman-Douglas Corporation. 2005-03-10. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2008-03-09. Retrieved 2007-09-09.
66. "Why is the capacity of my Secure Digital memory card (as reported by many operating systems) different than the capacity that is listed on its label?" (PDF). Sandisk.com. 2012-04-13. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2012-04-13. Retrieved 2017-12-30.
67. Safier, Seth A. "Frequently Asked Questions". Flash Memory Settlement. Poorman-Douglas Corporation. Archived from the original on 2007-09-28. Retrieved 2007-09-09.
68. Gutride, Adam; Seth A. Safier (2006-03-29). "Class Action Complaint". Orin Safier v. Western Digital Corporation. Western Digital Corporation. Archived from the original on 2007-10-16. Retrieved 2007-09-09.
69. Zimmerman, Bernard (2006). "Notice of Class Action and Proposed Settlement". Orin Safier v. Western Digital Corporation. Western Digital Corporation. Archived from the original on 2007-09-22. Retrieved 2007-09-09.
70. "Western Digital Settles Capacity Suit". Betanews.com. 2006-06-28. Retrieved 2017-12-30.
71. Jeremy Reimer (2006-06-30). "Western Digital settles drive size lawsuit". Ars Technica LLC. Retrieved 2010-02-10.
72. Western Digital Corporation (2006). "NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT ("NOTICE")". Archived from the original on 2010-05-07. Retrieved 2010-02-10.
73. Baskin, Scott D. (2006-02-01). ""Defendant Western Digital Corporation's Brief in Support of Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Approval"". Orin Safier v. Western Digital Corporation. Western Digital Corporation. Retrieved 2007-09-09.
74. "Settlement Website for Cho v. Seagate Technology (US) Holdings, Inc". Archived from the original on 2019-01-18. Retrieved 2011-04-12.
75. "Order Granting Motion to Dismiss" (PDF). United States District Court for the Northern District of California. Retrieved 2020-01-24.
76. IUCr IUPAC Interdivisional Committee on Nomenclature and Symbols (IDCNS) (1997-02-13) [1995]. "IUCr annual report for 1995" (Report). International Union of Crystallography. Archived from the original on 2009-08-27. Retrieved 2012-01-26.
77. "(IUCr) 1996 Report – IUPAC Interdivisional Committee on Nomenclature and Symbols (IDCNS)" (Report). International Union of Crystallography. 1997-02-14 [1996]. Archived from the original on 2013-06-13. Retrieved 2012-01-26.
78. "These prefixes for binary multiples, which were developed by IEC Technical Committee (TC) 25, Quantities and units, and their letter symbols, with the strong support of the International Committee for Weights and Measures (CIPM) and the IEEE, were adopted by the IEC as Amendment 2 to IEC International Standard IEC 60027-2: Letter symbols to be used in electrical technology – Part 2: Telecommunications and electronics."
79. "IUCR 1999 report on IUPAC Interdivisional Committee on Nomenclature and Symbols". Acta Crystallographica Section A: Foundations of Crystallography. 56 (6). Journals.iucr.org: 609–642. November 2000. doi:10.1107/S0108767300012873. PMID 11058849. Retrieved 2012-01-26.
80. IEC 60027-2 (2000-11) Ed. 2.0
81. "HERE COME ZEBI AND YOBI" (Press release). International Electrotechnical Commission. 2005-08-15. Archived from the original on 2007-06-11.
82. "niso, New Specs and Standards". Niso.org. Archived from the original on 2008-12-08. Retrieved 2012-01-26.
83. "International vocabulary of metrology – Basic and general concepts and associated terms (VIM)" (PDF). Bipm.org (3rd ed.). Archived (PDF) from the original on 2022-10-09. Retrieved 2017-12-30.
84. Barrow, Bruce (January 1997) [1996]. "A Lesson in Megabytes". IEEE Standards Bearer. 11. IEEE: 5. Archived from the original on 2022-05-28. Retrieved 2022-12-24.
85. The NIST Reference on Constants, Units, and Uncertainty
86. Barry N. Taylor & Ambler Thompson Ed. (2008). The International System of Units (SI) (PDF). Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology. p. 29. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2018-12-25. Retrieved 2010-04-27.
87. "mega (M) (as a prefix to units of semiconductor storage capacity)". JEDEC – Global Standards for the Microelectronics Industry. Retrieved 2021-04-14. The definitions of kilo, giga, and mega based on powers of two are included only to reflect common usage.
88. Low Power Double Data Rate 4 (LPDDR4) JESD209-4. JEDEC Solid State Technology Association. August 2014. p. 7. These devices contain the following number of bits: 4Gb has 4,294,967,296 bits ... 32Gb has 34,359,738,368 bits Free registration required to download the standard.
89. 1541-2002. Reaffirmed 27 March 2008. 2003-02-12. doi:10.1109/IEEESTD.2003.94236. ISBN 978-0-7381-3385-0. Archived from the original on 2012-10-14. Retrieved 2007-07-29. This standard is prepared with two goals in mind: (1) to preserve the SI prefixes as unambiguous decimal multipliers and (2) to provide alternative prefixes for those cases where binary multipliers are needed. The first goal affects the general public, the wide audience of technical and nontechnical persons who use computers without much concern for their construction or inner working. These persons will normally interpret kilo, mega, etc., in their proper decimal sense. The second goal speaks to specialists – the prefixes for binary multiples make it possible for persons who work in the information sciences to communicate with precision.
90. "IEEE-SA Standards Board Standards Review Committee (RevCom) Meeting Agenda". 2005-03-19. Archived from the original on 2007-09-22. Retrieved 2007-02-25. 1541-2002 (SCC14) IEEE Trial-Use Standard for Prefixes for Binary Multiples [No negative comments received during trial-use period, which is now complete; Sponsor requests elevation of status to full-use.] Recommendation: Elevate status of standard from trial-use to full-use. Editorial staff will be notified to implement the necessary changes. The standard will be due for a maintenance action in 2007.
91. Wallich, Paul (April 2008). "Tools & toys: Hacking the Nokia N800". IEEE Spectrum. 45 (4): 25. doi:10.1109/MSPEC.2008.4476441. S2CID 20129812. "A lot can happen in a decade. You can hold the Nokia N800 in your hand, yet it's a near-exact match for a high-end desktop PC from 10 years ago. It has a 320-megahertz processor, 128 megabytes of RAM, and a few gigabytes of available mass storage."
92. Gschwind, Michael; Erb, David; Manning, Sid; Nutter, Mark (June 2007). "An Open Source Environment for Cell Broadband Engine System Software" (PDF). Computer. 40 (6). IEEE Computer Society: 37–47. doi:10.1109/MC.2007.192. S2CID 10877922. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2022-10-09. "The processor has a memory subsystem with separate first-level 32-Kbyte instruction and data caches, and a 512-Kbyte unified second-level cache." Authors are with IBM.
93. "BIPM – SI prefixes". Bipm.org. Retrieved 2017-12-30.
94. "Rules for SAE Use of SI (Metric) Units] – Section C.1.12 – SI prefixes" (PDF). Sae.org. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2022-10-09. Retrieved 2017-12-30.
95. "CENELEC – Standards Development – List of Technical Bodies". Archived from the original on 2013-02-13.
96. "CENELEC – Standards Development – List of Technical Bodies". Archived from the original on 2012-07-22.
97. Hewlett-Packard (2009): "How many bytes are in a GB?" ISS Technology Update – Hewlett Packard Enterprise, volume 9, issue 1, quote: 'To reduce confusion, vendors are pursuing one of two remedies: they are changing SI prefixes to the new binary prefixes, or they are recalculating the numbers as powers of ten. [...] HP is considering modifying its storage utilities to report disk capacity with correct decimal and binary values side-by-side (for example, "300 GB (279.4 GiB)"), and report cache sizes with binary prefixes ("1 GiB")'.
98. DeRespinis, F., Hayward, P., Jenkins, J., Laird, A., McDonald, L., and Radzinski, E. (2011): The IBM style guide: conventions for writers and editors. IBM Press. quote: "To help avoid inaccuracy (especially with the larger prefixes) and potential ambiguity, the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) in 2000 adopted a set of prefixes specifically for binary multipliers (See IEC 60027-2). Their use is now supported by the United States National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) and incorporated into ISO 80000. They are also required by EU law and in certain contexts in the US. However, most documentation and products in the industry continue to use SI prefixes when referring to binary multipliers. In product documentation, follow the same standard that is used in the product itself (for example, in the interface or firmware). Whether you choose to use IEC prefixes for powers of 2 and SI prefixes for powers of 10, or use SI prefixes for a dual purpose ... be consistent in your usage and explain to the user your adopted system."
99. "IBM Knowledge Center". Pic.dhe.ibm.com. Archived from the original on 2014-03-17. Retrieved 2017-12-30.
100. As used in this article, the term customary binary prefix or similar refers to prefixes such as kilo, mega, giga, etc., borrowed from the similarly named SI prefixes but used to denote a power of 1024.
101. "Hewlett-Packard". Welcome.hp.com. Retrieved 2012-01-26.
102. "Consumer Electronics – Sony US". Sonystyle.com. Archived from the original on 2011-06-16. Retrieved 2017-12-30.
103. "4AllMemory.com". 4AllMemory.com. Retrieved 2012-01-26.
104. JEDEC Solid State Technology Association (December 2002). "JEDEC Standard No. 100B.01 – Terms, Definitions, and Letter Symbols for Microcomputers, Microprocessors, and Memory Integrated Circuits" (PDF). p. 8. Retrieved 2010-03-07. The definitions of kilo, giga, and mega based on powers of two are included only to reflect common usage. IEEE/ASTM SI 10-1997 states "This practice frequently leads to confusion and is deprecated." (Requires free registration and login.)
105. JEDEC (September 2009). "DDR3 SDRAM Standard". Retrieved 2010-02-04.
106. JEDEC (November 2009). "DDR2 SDRAM Standard". Retrieved 2010-02-04.
107. JEDEC. "Memory Configurations". Retrieved 2010-02-04.
108. JEDEC. "Memory Configurations Table of Contents" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 2022-10-09. Retrieved 2010-02-04.
109. JEDEC. "Terms and Definitions" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 2022-10-09. Retrieved 2010-02-04.
110. ^{[dead link‍]}
111. "FAQs". Samsung.com. Archived from the original on 2011-06-16. Retrieved 2017-12-30.
112. "Storage Solutions Guide" (PDF). Seagate. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2010-03-31. Retrieved 2010-03-04.
113. "Toshiba Introduces Two 1.8-inch Hard Disk Drive Families For Both High Performance and Long Battery Life in Mobile Computing Applications" (PDF) (Press release). Toshiba. 2009-11-04. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2009-11-22. Retrieved 2017-12-30.
114. "WD Model and Order Numbers" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2005-08-24.
115. "Client: Client HDD – Toshiba". Toshiba-tdmt.com.tw. Archived from the original on 2021-04-26. Retrieved 2017-12-30.
116. "Units". Linux Programmer's Manual. 2001-12-22. Archived from the original on 2007-09-02. Retrieved 2007-05-20. When the Linux kernel boots and says hda: 120064896 sectors (61473 MB) w/2048KiB Cache the MB are megabytes and the KiB are kibibytes.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: unfit URL (link)
117. "ESR post on LKML". Lwn.net. Retrieved 2012-01-26.
118. "Ubuntu implements units policy, will switch to base-10 units in future release". Neowin.net. Retrieved 2012-01-26.
119. "UnitsPolicy – Ubuntu Wiki". Wiki.ubuntu.com. Retrieved 2012-01-26.
120. "Snow Leopard's new maths". Macworld. 2009-08-28. Retrieved 2011-04-13.^{[permanent dead link‍]}
121. "How iOS and macOS report storage capacity". Apple Inc. 2018-02-27. Retrieved 2021-06-27.
122. "Ls(1) – Linux manual page".
123. "Patent WO2012098399A2 – Low-power oscillator – Google Patents". Google.com. Retrieved 2016-06-23.
124. Ainslie, Michael A.; Halvorsen, Michele B.; Robinson, Stephen P. (January 2022) [2021-11-09]. "A terminology standard for underwater acoustics and the benefits of international standardization". IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering. 47 (1). IEEE: 179–200. Bibcode:2022IJOE...47..179A. doi:10.1109/JOE.2021.3085947. eISSN 1558-1691. ISSN 0364-9059. S2CID 243948953. (22 pages)

Further reading

• "When is a kilobyte a kibibyte? And an MB an MiB?". International Electrotechnical Commission. 2007-02-12. Archived from the original on 2009-04-03. – An introduction to binary prefixes
• "Prefixes for binary multiples". NIST.
• "Get Ready for the mebi, gibi and tebi" (Press release). NIST. 1999-03-02. Archived from the original on 2016-08-20. Retrieved 2017-07-13.
• Kuhn, Markus (1996-12-29). "What is a Megabyte ...?".—a 1996–1999 paper on bits, bytes, prefixes and symbols
• de Boyne Pollard, Jonathan. "There is no such thing as a 1.44 MB standard format floppy disc". Frequently Given Answers. Archived from the original on 2016-10-07.
• Michael Quinion (1999-08-21). "Kibibyte". World Wide Words. Archived from the original on 2004-06-12. Retrieved 2002-11-13.—Another description of binary prefixes
• James Wiebe (2003-10-09). "When One Billion does not equal One Billion, or: Why your computer's disk drive capacity doesn't appear to match the stated capacity" (PDF). WiebeTech (Press release). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2013-12-04. Retrieved 2010-01-22.—White-paper on the controversy over drive capacities

External links

• A plea for sanity Archived 2021-03-06 at the Wayback Machine
• A summary of the organizations, software, and so on that have implemented the new binary prefixes
• Storage Capacity Measurement Standards Archived 2015-01-02 at the Wayback Machine