Adobe Systems, Inc. v. Southern Software, Inc.
United States District Court case / From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Dear Wikiwand AI, let's keep it short by simply answering these key questions:
Can you list the top facts and stats about Adobe Systems, Inc. v. Southern Software, Inc.?
Summarize this article for a 10 year old
Adobe Systems, Inc. v. Southern Software, Inc. was a case in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California regarding the copyrightability of digitized typefaces (computer fonts). The case is notable since typeface designs in general are not protected under United States copyright law, as determined in Eltra Corp. v. Ringer. Since that case, the United States Copyright Office has published policy decisions acknowledging the registration of computer programs that generate typefaces. In this case, the court held that Adobe's Utopia font was protectable under copyright and Southern Software, Inc.'s Veracity font was substantially similar and infringing.[1]
Adobe Systems, Inc. v. Southern Software, Inc. | |
---|---|
Court | United States District Court for the Northern District of California |
Full case name | Adobe Systems, Inc. v. Southern Software, Inc. |
Decided | January 30, 1998 |
Docket nos. | No. C-95-20710 RMW |
Citation(s) | 1998 WL 104303, 1998 U.S.Dist. LEXIS 1941, 45 U.S.P.Q. 2d 1827 (N.D. Cal. Feb. 2, 1998) |
Holding | |
The court held that Adobe's font program was protectable expression, and Southern Software's font was substantially similar and infringing. | |
Court membership | |
Judge(s) sitting | Ronald M. Whyte |
Keywords | |
Typeface, United States copyright law |