User talk:Auró
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Hello, I am a Catalan wikipedist, also working in, and obtaining a lot of information from, English Wikipedia, and in Spanish Wikipedia.Auró (talk) 19:51, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
2011 | |||
---|---|---|---|
Plantinga and possible worldsHello, Auró! I'm currently without time to edit the article to put the reference, so I hope that you will use your interest for Plantinga's opinion as reason for doing the work for me! :D Here is the interview: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p692Kp-BcRQ God bless! Binary numeral system in Leibniz articleHey, Auró. Thanks for the comment; I'm happy to have discussion about it. There were two issues that I identified with the statement in that article, and I tried to encapsulate them into the limited space allowed by the edit summary. For convenience, here's what I wrote in my summary: "remove mention of binary numeral system being something that 'is used on computers'; it's bad prose and misguided at best". The first issue is that I regarded it as being "bad prose". The clause I removed from the article mentions the binary numeral system being something "which is used on computers". It's subjective, of course, but I felt it was poorly worded. If this were the only issue I detected in that clause, I agree that it would have behooved any reasonable person to improve the word choice rather than simply removing it altogether. However, it seemed to me that there was another issue. The second issue is a bit more difficult to explain and has to do with the subtlety of language. Rather than to try (and certainly fail) at explaining it, I'll attempt to describe it in a way that I hope proves to be more successful at communicating my thoughts. In essence, whether you detect the same issue in the clause I removed necessitates that you answer "yes" to the following questions:
On second thought, it seems that answering "yes" to both of these questions would imply that the whole mention of Leibniz's work on binary should be removed from the section on computation, as it would be a non-sequitur. I'm not sure what to do, actually. -- C. A. Russell (talk) 18:52, 27 March 2011 (UTC) Thank you :-)Thank you for your contribution to Planetary boundaries. :-) 97.87.29.188 (talk) 20:06, 9 July 2011 (UTC) Thank you also, Auró. (",) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.112.213.29 (talk) 00:47, 10 July 2011 (UTC) A barnstar for you!
|
2012 |
---|
EcosystemI just wanted to explain why I haven't responded to your comment - I'm hoping someone else will weigh in. I didn't stop pruning links because I thought I was done (I think your suggestions make sense) but rather because I figured I'd work on expanding the article. Once that's done, a lot of the "See also" should go because it will be linked from the article. Guettarda (talk) 02:02, 14 March 2012 (UTC) |
2013 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
WikiProject ForestryHi Auró, Given your interest & practice of forestry, perhaps you would be interested in participating in WikiProject Forestry. Thanks for your consideration & Kind regards, DA Sonnenfeld (talk) 16:50, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
IcthusChristianity newsletter: New format, new focusHello,I notice that you aren't currently subscribed to Ichthus, the WikiProject Christianity newsletter. Witha new format, we would be delighted to offer you a trial three-month, money-back guarantee, subscription to our newsletter. If you are interested then please add your name tothis list, and you will receive your first issue shortly. From June 2013 we are starting a new "in focus" section that tells our readers about an interesting and important groups of articles. The first set is about Jesus, of course. We have also started a new book review section and our own "did you know" section. In the near future I hope to start a section where a new user briefly discusses their interests.--Gilderien Chat|List of good deeds 21:09, 17 May 2013 (UTC) Love history & culture? Get involved in WikiProject World Digital Library!
HabitatHi. Don't worry, I never remove tags without a valid reason, and for me too an important article as Habitat needed expansion. As you can see I've not removed the ecology-stub tag but I've simply placed it below the navbox and category, as for the standards of enwiki (French, Spanish, Italian (and other) Wikipedias use to add the stub tags above the article, this one not). Good work and regards. --Dэя-Бøяg 20:47, 6 September 2013 (UTC) |