User:Fmyd/sandbox
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Mavrix Photo, Inc. v. Brand Technologies, Inc., 647 F.3d 1218 (9th Cir. 2011), is a case in American intellectual property law. The case involved Personal Jurisdiction in the context of internet contacts.[1]
This is the user sandbox of Fmyd. A user sandbox is a subpage of the user's user page. It serves as a testing spot and page development space for the user and is not an encyclopedia article. Create or edit your own sandbox here. Other sandboxes: Main sandbox | Template sandbox Finished writing a draft article? Are you ready to request review of it by an experienced editor for possible inclusion in Wikipedia? Submit your draft for review! |
Quick Facts Mavrix Photo, Inc. v. Brand Technologies, Inc., Court ...
Mavrix Photo, Inc. v. Brand Technologies, Inc. | |
---|---|
Court | United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit |
Full case name | Mavrix Photo, Inc. v. Brand Technologies, Inc.; Brad Mandell and Brandtech; gossipgirls.com; celebrity-gossip.net. |
Decided | Aug. 8, 2011 |
Citation | 647 F.3d 1218(2011) |
Court membership | |
Judges sitting | Kim McLane Wardlaw, William A. Fletcher, and Barbara M. Lynn |
Close
This case had three main holdings. First, Brand lacked sufficient contact with California for exercise of general jurisdicition. Second, Brand's alleged copyright infringement on its website was ecpressly aimed at California, as required, under puposeful direction analysis, to support specific jurisdiction; and finally, Brand's aallenged copyright infringement caused harm that Brand knew was likely to be suffered in California as required to support specific jurisdiction.