![cover image](https://wikiwandv2-19431.kxcdn.com/_next/image?url=https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/24/US-CourtOfAppeals-6thCircuit-Seal.png/640px-US-CourtOfAppeals-6thCircuit-Seal.png&w=640&q=50)
Tritent International Corp. v. Kentucky
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Tritent International Corp. v. Commonwealth of Kentucky, 467 F.3d 547 (6th Cir. 2006),[1] is a US antitrust law case decided by the Court of Appeals on the Sixth Circuit. The case is notable, inter alia, because it provides a summary of the difficult terms of the Tobacco Master Settlement Agreement.
Quick Facts Tritent International Corp. v. Kentucky, Court ...
Tritent International Corp. v. Kentucky | |
---|---|
![]() | |
Court | United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit |
Full case name | Tritent International Corp. v. Kentucky |
Argued | September 20, 2006 |
Decided | October 30, 2006 |
Citation | 467 F.3d 547 (6th Cir. 2006) |
Court membership | |
Judges sitting | Eric L. Clay, Ronald Lee Gilman, William H. Stafford, Jr. (N.D. Fla.) |
Case opinions | |
Majority | Gilman, joined by Clay, Stafford |
Laws applied | |
Sherman Act |
Close