Draft:LAPaL
Medicinal products licencing database / From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The Long-Acting Therapeutics Patents and Licensing Database (LAPaL) is a publicly available database dedicated to providing comprehensive data on long-acting medicinal products and extended-release drug delivery technologies worldwide. This open-access, collaborative resource aims to facilitate partnerships in the long-acting therapeutics space and to improve access to these health interventions. LAPaL includes information on the main characteristics of the drugs and drug technologies and an overview of their intellectual property, clinical trials landscape as well as information on their national filings. With support from Unitaid, it was launched in 2021 by the Medicines Patent Pool.[1]. Additional funding was received from the NIH through the LEAP program. LAPaL offers comprehensive and up-to-date information on the technical specifications, developmental progress, and intellectual property (IP) status of a selection of long-acting treatments to improve health outcomes in low- and middle-income nations. The primary interest of LAPaL is long-acting therapeutics [2]. These formulations of medicines elicit less frequent administration while maintaining safe and effective dosing to treat or prevent a set of conditions. Long-acting formulations are often an important alternative for health care providers, persons receiving the medications, and their caregivers. The potential benefits of long-acting therapeutics include enhanced adherence to the prescribed regimen, improved clinical efficacy, and in some instances, improved safety, and a decrease in the relapse rates [3]. LAPaL covers a wide array of health areas, including HIV, malaria, hepatitis, respiratory syncytial virus, mental health disorders, and other indications [4].
Submission declined on 22 July 2024 by CFA (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
| ![]() |
Submission declined on 10 July 2024 by MicrobiologyMarcus (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies. Declined by MicrobiologyMarcus 30 days ago. | ![]() |
Submission declined on 5 July 2024 by MicrobiologyMarcus (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. Declined by MicrobiologyMarcus 35 days ago. | ![]() |
Submission declined on 1 July 2024 by Jamiebuba (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: Declined by Jamiebuba 39 days ago.
| ![]() |
Submission declined on 1 July 2024 by Ae245 (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject. Declined by Ae245 39 days ago. | ![]() |
Comment: Innapropriate inline WP:External links and full of promotional wording. microbiologyMarcus [petri dish·growths] 13:56, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
Comment: See WP:REFB for understanding how to use WP:Inline citations. microbiologyMarcus [petri dish·growths] 16:08, 5 July 2024 (UTC)