![cover image](https://wikiwandv2-19431.kxcdn.com/_next/image?url=https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/3/3c/District_of_Columbia_Court_of_Appeals_Seal.svg/640px-District_of_Columbia_Court_of_Appeals_Seal.svg.png&w=640&q=50)
Blue Man Vegas, LLC v. NLRB
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Blue Man Vegas, LLC v. NLRB (529 F. 3d 417 (D.C. Cir. 2008),[1] was a case of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, in which it held on whether the National Labor Relations Board had erred in its holding the bargaining unit proposed by the union was appropriate. The National Labor Relations Board had previously decided that Blue Man Vegas, LLC had engaged in unfair labor practices under the terms of the National Labor Relations Act through its refusing to bargain with the established union, which served as the bargaining representative.
![]() | This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these template messages)
|
Quick Facts Blue Man Vegas, LLC v. NLRB, Court ...
Blue Man Vegas, LLC v. NLRB | |
---|---|
![]() | |
Court | United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit |
Full case name | BLUE MAN VEGAS, LLC, Petitioner v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent International Alliance of Theatrical Stage Employees, Moving Picture Technicians, Artists and Allied Crafts of the United States, its Territories, Canada, Local 720, AFL-CIO, Intervenor. |
Decided | June 10, 2008 (2008-06-10) |
Citation | 529 F. 3d 417 (D.C. Cir. 2008) |
Transcript | FindLaw |
Case opinions | |
(1) NLRB correctly applied "overwhelming community of interest" standard; (2) NLRB decision was supported by substantial evidence; and (3) NLRB decision did not create "disfavored residual unit." | |
Decision by | Douglas H. Ginsburg |
Close