Smith v. Pilots Union
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Smith v. Pilots Union, 296 F.3d 380 (5th Cir. 2002),[1] is a court case in which the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit held that although third officer aboard an oceangoing cargo vessel was a supervisor, the six-month period of limitations of § 10(b) of the National Labor Relations Act[2] still applies to Smith's suit against the union whether or not he was a supervisor.
This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these template messages)
|
Quick Facts Smith v. Pilots Union, Court ...
Smith v. Pilots Union | |
---|---|
Court | United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit |
Full case name | Stuart H. Smith , Jr. v. International Organization Of Masters, Mates and Pilots |
Decided | July 17, 2002 |
Citation(s) | 296 F.3d 380 (5th Cir. 2002) |
Case history | |
Prior history | Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Louisiana, at New Orleans. |
Subsequent history | Appeal to the United States Supreme Court |
Court membership | |
Judge(s) sitting | Reynaldo Guerra Garza, E. Grady Jolly, Jacques L. Wiener Jr. |
Case opinions | |
Majority | Garza, joined by a unanimous court |
Laws applied | |
National Labor Relations Act § 10(b), 29 U.S.C. § 160(b) |
Close