Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District No. 1

turn on merely a comparison of these tangible factors in the Negro and white schools involved in each of the cases. We must look instead to the effect

the political status of children born in this country of foreign parents. The question was not directly involved in the Slaughter-house cases, and what

Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District No. 1）中，法院裁定家长不能根据种族因素来判断应该把自己的孩子送到哪一所公立学校念书。 在1954年的埃尔南德斯诉得克萨斯州案（英语：Hernandez v.

opportunities in education, employment, and other areas. [...] The U.S. Constitution makes a similar provision in the Fourteenth Amendment. It says that no state

奥贝格费尔诉霍奇斯案（英語：Obergefell v. Hodges，576 U.S. 644 (2015)）是美国联邦最高法院对于同性婚姻的重要判例。最高法院在判决中称同性婚姻的权利受到宪法保障，各州不得立法禁止。 2015年1月16日，最高法院决定将该案与田纳西州的坦科诉哈斯拉姆案（Tanco v. Haslam）、密歇根州的德波尔诉斯奈德案（DeBoer