Prescott 2010，第273頁 harvnb模板錯誤: 無指向目標: CITEREFPrescott2010 (幫助): 'Anti-Stratfordian' is the collective name for the belief that someone other than the man from Stratford wrote the plays commonly attributed to him."; McMichael & Glenn 1962，第56頁 harvnb模板錯誤: 無指向目標: CITEREFMcMichaelGlenn1962 (幫助).
Kathman 2003，第621頁 harvnb模板錯誤: 無指向目標: CITEREFKathman2003 (幫助): "...antiStratfordism has remained a fringe belief system"; Schoenbaum 1991，第450頁 harvnb模板錯誤: 無指向目標: CITEREFSchoenbaum1991 (幫助); Paster 1999，第38頁 harvnb模板錯誤: 無指向目標: CITEREFPaster1999 (幫助): "To ask me about the authorship question ... is like asking a palaeontologist to debate a creationist's account of the fossil record."; Nelson 2004，第149–51頁 harvnb模板錯誤: 無指向目標: CITEREFNelson2004 (幫助): "I do not know of a single professor of the 1,300-member Shakespeare Association of America who questions the identity of Shakespeare ... antagonism to the authorship debate from within the profession is so great that it would be as difficult for a professed Oxfordian to be hired in the first place, much less gain tenure..."; Carroll 2004，第278–9頁 harvnb模板錯誤: 無指向目標: CITEREFCarroll2004 (幫助): "I have never met anyone in an academic position like mine, in the Establishment, who entertained the slightest doubt as to Shakespeare's authorship of the general body of plays attributed to him."; Pendleton 1994，第21頁 harvnb模板錯誤: 無指向目標: CITEREFPendleton1994 (幫助): "Shakespeareans sometimes take the position that to even engage the Oxfordian hypothesis is to give it a countenance it does not warrant."; Sutherland & Watts 2000，第7頁 harvnb模板錯誤: 無指向目標: CITEREFSutherlandWatts2000 (幫助): "There is, it should be noted, no academic Shakespearian of any standing who goes along with the Oxfordian theory."; Gibson 2005，第30頁 harvnb模板錯誤: 無指向目標: CITEREFGibson2005 (幫助): "...most of the great Shakespearean scholars are to be found in the Stratfordian camp..."
