社会无政府主义（英语：Social anarchism或Socialist anarchism[1]），也称无政府社会主义（Anarcho-socialism或Anarchist socialism）[2]、社群无政府主义（Communitarian anarchism）[3]（可与自由意志社会主义[1]、左派自由意志主义[4]、左派无政府主义[5]交替使用），是用来区分两大类无政府主义的一种总称，一类是集体主义，另一类是个人无政府主义。个人主义型式的无政府主义强调个人自治和人类的理性，社会无政府主义者“将个人自由视为与社会平等在概念上的连结，强调社会公众和互助”。[6] 不同于个人无政府主义着重在私有财产或财物的重要性，社会无政府主义反对私有财产，视为是社会不平等的来源。[7]
社会无政府主义[8][9][10][11][12]作为无政府主义的一个分支，认为个人自由与互助相联系[13]。其理论强调共同体和平等原则是对自主权和公民自由的补充，它试图通过在地方分权的联邦制中保持言论自由，思想自由和辅助性原则来达到这种平衡。辅助性原则的最佳定义是“一个人不应该超出个人的范围，并向共同体承诺可以通过他们自己拥有的企业和工厂完成工作”并且“每一种社会机构都应该具有向社会成员提供帮助的性质，而不是统治或兼并他们”，最明显地表达这种特征的口号或许是“不要将自治的机构从人们手中夺走。”[13][14]
社会无政府主义一直是无政府主义的主要流派。从术语上讲，强调社群主义和合作社主义的社会无政府主义与个人无政府主义形成鲜明对比，同时与后者一样作为无政府主义，反对与集体思维和从众行为相关的威权共产主义，这有利于个人与社会之间的和谐。同时社会无政府主义通过人民自决，工人自治，教育，赋权并基于反权威的检查和警惕来抵制权威。尽管“检查”这一概念可能显得与无政府主义原则相违背，但实际上无政府主义的检查所指向的是个体对个人自由的捍卫和非强制：DIY的思想方法与社会领域的教育相结合[15]。最重要的是，社会无政府主义还主张将现在和未来的私有生产资料转换成公有制[16][17][18]，它认为这么做可以通过更轻松地使用生产资料来保持对个人财产的尊重并通过共享公共资源来保护个人权利[19]。
社会无政府主义被认为是一个笼统的术语，因为它通常指代着诸如无政府共产主义、集体无政府主义以及互助主义等概念，有时也可以包括由非国家控制的行会社会主义联盟，基于企业内双重权力的产业民主和经济民主，甚至是主张由工人委员会联盟，工人委员会取代国家并保留大部分基本权利的派系。此外，它还包括无政府工团主义的工会理论，Platformism和specifism的社会斗争策略以及社会生态学。作为一个术语，随着社会无政府主义的语义与发生重叠，在19世纪末与个人无政府主义相区别开后，以无政府共产主义取代“集体无政府主义”成为主要趋势[来源请求]。
社会无政府主义属于自由意志主义[20]，自由意志社会主义[1]，左翼自由主义[21][22]。它在十九世纪末兴起并与个人无政府主义相区别[23]。
社会无政府主义被描述为无政府主义的集体主义或共产主义流派，并代表了与社会主义相适应的无政府主义形式，这令其与以个人无政府主义为代表的自由社会主义派形成鲜明对比。[24][25][26][27]但是，一些集体或无政府共产主义者在激进的个人主义理论上建立了他们的理论[28]，将集体主义或共产主义视为实现个人自由的最佳社会制度。[29] 个人主义-社会主义之间的区分也受到质疑，因为个人无政府主义在很大程度上是社会主义的，并且相互影响。[26][30]
在美国，“社会无政府主义”是指出版《社会无政府主义》这本刊物的圈子，之后由默里·布克钦所宣扬。布克金将社会无政府主义结合“左派”，他在当中提到了“人类团结的优秀传统与人性潜力的信念”、国际主义和邦联主义、民主精神、反军国主义和理性的世俗主义。然而，宗教无政府主义和宗教左派则反对左派与“理性世俗主义”的合作，并发起了多次左翼宗教运动，如解放神学和民权运动。社会无政府主义致力于“自由结交的人们在自由社区内居住并合作”。[31]
Ostergaard, Geoffrey. "Anarchism". The Blackwell Dictionary of Modern Social Thought. Blackwell Publishing. p. 14.
Proudhon, Pierre-Joseph (1893). What is Property?, p. 118
Morris, Christopher W. 1998. An Essay on the Modern State. Cambridge University Press. p. 74
Bookchin, Murray. Social Anarchism Or Lifestyle Anarchism: An Unbridgeable Chasm. AK Press. 1995.
Thagard, Paul. 2002. Coherence in Thought and Action. MIT Press. p. 153
Suissa, Judith(2001) "Anarchism, Utopias and Philosophy of Education" Journal of Philosophy of Education 35 (4), 627–646. doi:10.1111/1467-9752.00249
Ostergaard, Geoffrey. "Anarchism". A Dictionary of Marxist Thought. Blackwell Publishing, 1991. p. 21.
Suissa, Judith (2001). "Anarchism, Utopias and Philosophy of Education". Journal of Philosophy of Education 35 (4). pp. 627–646. doi:10.1111/1467-9752.00249. Ostergaard, Geoffrey (1991). "Anarchism". A Dictionary of Marxist Thought. Blackwell Publishing. p. 21.
Peacock, Adrian (1999). Two Hundred Pharaohs, Five Billion Slaves. London: Ellipsis.
Goodwin, Barbara (2007). Using Political Ideas. John Wiley & Sons.
Berkman, Alexander (1929). What Is Communist Anarchism? （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆）. "The revolution abolishes private ownership of the means of production and distribution, and with it goes capitalistic business. Personal possession remains only in the things you use. Thus, your watch is your own, but the watch factory belongs to the people". "Anarchism". In Gaus, Gerald F.; D'Agostino, Fred, eds. (2012), more specifically, libertarian socialism. The Routledge Companion to Social and Political Philosophy. p. 227. "In its oldest sense, it is a synonym either for anarchism in general or social anarchism in particular".
- ^ 引用错误：没有为名为
Bookchin 1995的参考文献提供内容
- ^ 引用错误：没有为名为
Routledge p. 227的参考文献提供内容
"An Anarchist FAQ" （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆）. "No, far from it. So few anarchists found the individualist solution to the social question or the attempts of some of them to excommunicate social anarchism from the movement convincing". Boyd, Tony; Harrison, Kevin, eds. (2003). "Marxism and Anarchism". Understanding Political Ideas and Movements. Manchester University Press. p. 251. ISBN 9780719061516. McKay, Iain (编). Section G – Is Individualist Anarchism Capitalistic?. An Anarchist FAQ II. Stirling: AK Press. 2012. ISBN 9781849351225. Carson, Kevin (2017). "Anarchism and Markets". In Jun, Nathan J. (2017). Brill's Companion to Anarchism and Philosophy. BRILL. p. 81. ISBN 9789004356894. Baginki, Max (May 1907). "Stirner: The Ego and His Own" （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆）. Mother Earth (2: 3). "Modern Communists are more individualistic than Stirner. To them, not merely religion, morality, family and State are spooks, but property also is no more than a spook, in whose name the individual is enslaved — and how enslaved! [...] Communism thus creates a basis for the liberty and Eigenheit of the individual. I am a Communist because I am an Individualist. Fully as heartily the Communists concur with Stirner when he puts the word take in place of demand — that leads to the dissolution of property, to expropriation. Individualism and Communism go hand in hand."; Novatore, Renzo (1924). "Towards the Creative Nothing" （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆）; Gray, Christopher (1974). Leaving the Twentieth Century. p. 88; Black, Bob (2010). "Nightmares of Reason" （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆）. "[C]ommunism is the final fulfillment of individualism. [...] The apparent contradiction between individualism and communism rests on a misunderstanding of both. [...] Subjectivity is also objective: the individual really is subjective. It is nonsense to speak of "emphatically prioritizing the social over the individual," [...]. You may as well speak of prioritizing the chicken over the egg. Anarchy is a "method of individualization." It aims to combine the greatest individual development with the greatest communal unity". Kropotkin, Peter (1901). "Communism and Anarchy" （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆）. "Communism is the one which guarantees the greatest amount of individual liberty — provided that the idea that begets the community be Liberty, Anarchy [...]. Communism guarantees economic freedom better than any other form of association, because it can guarantee wellbeing, even luxury, in return for a few hours of work instead of a day's work."; Truda, Dielo (1926). "Organisational Platform of the Libertarian Communists" （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆）. "This other society will be libertarian communism, in which social solidarity and free individuality find their full expression, and in which these two ideas develop in perfect harmony."; "My Perspectives" （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆）. Willful Disobedience (2: 12). "I see the dichotomies made between individualism and communism, individual revolt and class struggle, the struggle against human exploitation and the exploitation of nature as false dichotomies and feel that those who accept them are impoverishing their own critique and struggle."; Brown, L. Susan (2002). The Politics of Individualism. Black Rose Books; Brown, L. Susan (2 February 2011). "Does Work Really Work?" （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆）.
