From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
|
I've already wikified your new article once, please don't change any of the wiki links, because I believe them to be valid. Thanks, -Razorflame 16:17, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
What exactly are you trying to achieve on this site? -Razorflame (contributions) Talk 17:06, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
I don't have a problem with what you are doing. I"m just wondering what you change on this site? -Razorflame (contributions) Talk 17:15, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
I've noticed that you like articles that have to do with medical information. Is that what you specialize in? -Razorflame (contributions) Talk 17:17, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the additions you have made recently. You must have a special knowledge or interest and I hope you carry on contributing to SEWP. -- Barliner talk 18:32, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
I've noticed that your userpage is still blank. Please don't take this as critisizm, but I am merely suggesting that it might be a good idea to start your userpage? -Razorflame (contributions) Talk 19:45, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
Sure! I know how to link to the English Wikipedia from here but I'm not sure about the two other languages.. I'll try it out.
Gwib-(talk)- 16:49, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
When you make changes to pages, it is usually a good idea to write an edit summary so that other editors on this site are able to identify exactly what it is you are changing on the page. Most edit summaries are just a little note that says more specifically what you are changing. Do you think you could please start using edit summaries here? If you have problems using the edit summary feature, there is an option under my settings that allows Wikipedia to prompt you when you enter a blank edit summary. Cheers, Razorflame 14:15, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
Hi Hordaland, I highly appreciate your work on circadian rhythms; you did realy great work collecting all this information, but I was astonished to see that you edited my citations regarding the extraocular clocks in the skin. This was a valid and correct citation and I can assure you from my own work that cry-1 and -2 respond to light in human keratinocytes which was also proven by other groups, e.g. Kawara, S. et al. J. Inv. Derm. 2002, Vol 119, 6 Dec.: Low-dose UVB Rays Alter the mRNA Expression of the Circadian Clock Genes in cultured Human Keratinocytes regards, Joerg
Yep, this is what I was referring to. You are completely right that Campbells experiments are not reproducible and that shining light on the back of the knee does not reset the SCN, but nevertheless skin cells respond to light (UVB-450nm) by altering circadian gene expression. And since skin cells are involved in serotonin/melatonin production it is absolutly not clear yet, if this has systemic effects or not. This is why I wrote "... a systemic influence has not been proven so far". There is clearly a lot of work to do in this area. Anyway, thanks for your response. 16:30, 25 April 2008 Joerg
Hi, do you know any large places on the coast in Hordaland, without an article in En-wiki? "Large places" with many inhabitants, or with companies that employ several hundred people. Sju hav (talk) 15:05, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Seamless Wikipedia browsing. On steroids.
Every time you click a link to Wikipedia, Wiktionary or Wikiquote in your browser's search results, it will show the modern Wikiwand interface.
Wikiwand extension is a five stars, simple, with minimum permission required to keep your browsing private, safe and transparent.