A word must become a friend or you will not understand it. Perhaps you do well to be cool and detached when you are seeking information, but I remind you of the wife who complained, 'When I ask John if he loves me, he thinks I am asking for information'.
Case of Swans, 7 Rep. 15, 17 (1592).
Fraud and deceit abound in these days more than in former times.
Twyne's Case (1602).
Every libel, which is called famosus libellus, is made either against a private man, or against a public person. If it be against a private man, it deserves a severe punishment.
77 Eng. Rep. 250 (1605).
Law is the safest helmet.
Inscription in rings given by Coke to several of his friends on June 20, 1606, in anticipation of his judicial investiture; reported in Humphry William Woolrych, The Life of the Right Honourable Sir Edward Coke (1826) p.75. Derived from a latin maxim, Lex est tutissima cassis; sub clypeo legis nemo decipitur: Law is the safest helmet; under the shield of the law no one is deceived.
The house of every one is to him as his castle and fortress, as well for his defence against injury and violence as for his repose.
They (corporations) cannot commit treason, nor be outlawed nor excommunicate, for they have no souls.
Case of Sutton's Hospital, 10 Rep. 32.; 77 Eng Rep 960, 973 (K.B. 1612).
When poor England stood alone, and had not the access of another kingdom, and yet had more and as potent enemies as now it hath, and yet the King of England prevailed.
Speech to the committee of the House of Commons (2 April 1628)
Magna Charta is such a fellow, that he will have no sovereign.
Speech to the committee of the House of Commons (20 May 1628)
Six hours in sleep, in law's grave study six, Four spend in prayer, the rest on Nature fix.
Translation of lines quoted by Coke. Compare: "Seven hours to law, to soothing slumber seven; Ten to the world allot, and all to heaven" - Sir William Jones.
Institutes of the Laws of England (1628)
The gladsome light of jurisprudence.
The First Part of the Institutes of the Laws of England, or, A Commentary on Littleton, (London, 1628, ed. F. Hargrave and C. Butler, 19th ed., London, 1832), First Institute.
He is not cheated who knows he is being cheated.
The First Part of the Institutes of the Laws of England, or, A Commentary on Littleton, (London, 1628, ed. F. Hargrave and C. Butler, 19th ed., London, 1832), First Institute.
Only this incident inseparable every custom must have, viz., that it be consonant to reason; for how long soever it hath continued, if it be against reason, it is of no force in law.
The First Part of the Institutes of the Laws of England, or, A Commentary on Littleton, part 62a (London, 1628, ed. F. Hargrave and C. Butler, 19th ed., London, 1832).
Reason is the life of the law; nay, the common law itself is nothing else but reason... The law, which is perfection of reason.
The First Part of the Institutes of the Laws of England, or, A Commentary on Littleton (London, 1628, ed. F. Hargrave and C. Butler, 19th ed., London, 1832), Third Institute. Compare: "Let us consider the reason of the case. For nothing is law that is not reason", Sir John Powell, Coggs vs. Bernard, 2 Ld. Raym. Rep. p.911.
A man's house is his castle — et domus sua cuique est tutissimum refugium.
The First Part of the Institutes of the Laws of England, or, A Commentary on Littleton (London, 1628, ed. F. Hargrave and C. Butler, 19th ed., London, 1832), Third Institute, p.162. The exact translation of the Latin portion is: "and where shall a man be safe if it be not in his own house?", quoted from Pandects, lib. ii. tit. iv. De in Jus vocando.
The Common lawes of the Realme should by no means be delayed for the law is the surest sanctuary, that a man should take, and the strongest fortresse to protect the weakest of all, lex et tutissima cassis.
Institutes of the Laws of England, Second Part, vol. 1 (1642), Notes to Ch. XXIX of the Charter [Magna Carta], paragraph 1391
Thought the bribe be small, yet the fault is great.
Institutes of the Laws of England, vol. 3.
The King himself should be under no man, but under God and the Law.
Prohibitions del Roy, 12 Co. Rep. 63, quoting Henry de Bracton's treatise on the laws and customs of England.
A witch is a person who hath conference with the Devil to consult with him or to do some act.
Reported in Margaret Alice Murray, The Witch-Cult in Western Europe: A Study in Anthropology (2007) p.18.
[T]o give every man his due, had it not been for Sir Edward Coke's Reports, which though they may have errors, and some peremptory and extrajudicial resolutions more than are warranted; yet they contain infinite good decisions, and rulings over cases: the law, by this time, had been almost like a ship without ballast.
Francis Bacon, A Proposition to His Majesty by Sir Francis Bacon, Knight, His Majesty's Attorney General, and One of His Privy Council; Touching the Compiling and Amendment of the Laws of England, quoted in The Works of Francis Bacon, Baron of Verulam, viscount St. Alban, and Lord High Chancellor of England, Volume IV (1803), p. 367
The Reminiscent may appear to recommend too much attention to Littleton and Coke: but he never yet has met with a person, thoroughly conversant in the law of real property, who did not think with him,—that he is the best lawyer, and will succeed best in his profession, who best understands Coke upon Littleton. Against one error, he begs leave particularly to caution the student:—not to suspect, for a moment, that, because he himself does not see the utility of what he reads in this work, or the application of the part of it which he is reading, to any practical purpose, it is therefore useless. There is not in the whole of the golden book, a single line, which the student will not, in his professional career, find, on more than one occasion, eminently useful.
The name of Sir Edward Coke, who lived from 1551 to 1634, is important in the development of English historical study, the evolution of the common law, and the parliamentary conflict with the early Stuarts. Coke used the historical methods of the time in order to magnify the claims of the common law; in order to codify our legal traditions in opposition to royal authority; and, particularly in the 1620's, in order to provide the House of Commons with material for a conflict with the crown on questions of historical interpretation. He helped to secure that the traditional system of English law should win the victory in the 17th century not only over the king but also over rival systems of law which could claim to be perhaps more efficient, perhaps even more up-to-date
We must remind ourselves that the weaknesses Coke might have had as a general historian did not prevent his being one of the greatest of English lawyers. If he gave a new turn to the law by what purported to be an appeal to the past, this was itself the mark of a creative mind that was able to achieve practical results by virtue of an added technical ability. He more than anybody else translated medieval limitations upon the monarchy into 17th-century terms; and if he transposed feudal safeguards into common-law restrictions, still his anachronistic sins became a service to the cause of liberty. All that he did helped to confirm the view that in England the king is under the law, and conspired to bring that view of English government to a more complete and vivid realization.
In the study of law, the common law, be sure, deserves your first and last attention; and he has conquered all the difficulties of this law, who is master of the Institutes. You must conquer the Institutes. The road of science is much easier now than it was when I set out; I began with Coke-Littleton, and broke through.
Jeremiah Gridley, remarks to John Adams (25 October 1758), quoted in The Works of John Adams, Second President of the United States: With a Life of the Author, Notes and Illustrations, by His Grandson Charles Francis Adams, Vol. II (1850), pp. 46-47
We have now waded through the first chapter of Coke upon Littleton; but we must not yet quit Sir Edward; quaint as he is, we must go through another chapter or two, otherwise we shall not be able to split hairs with Mr. Fearne, when we come to contingent remainders; for unless we lay our groundwork in the pages of Sir Edward Coke, whatever superstructure we may raise will be "like a house built upon the sand;" for Coke "is not a name only," but (as to these matters) the law itself.
James Hawkshead, An Essay on the Operation in Wills of the Word Issue; And Also of the Words Heirs of the Body, Dying Without Issue, and Dying Without Leaving Issue; and the Periphrases of Them: With a Familiar Illustration of That Ancient Rule of Law, Commonly Called the Rule in Shelley's Case; And a short Historical Deduction of the Rule form its Feudal Origin. With Three Introductory Chapters on the Nature of Estates at Common Law, Remainders, Conditions, Conditional Limitations, and Executory Devises (1826), p. 76
Until well into the nineteenth century, one could become a lawyer in the United States simply by studying Coke's First Institute.
Richard Helgerson, Forms of Nationhood: The Elizabethan Writing of England (1992), p. 17
Let not the American student of law supposes that the same necessity does not here exist, as in England, to make this 'golden book,' his principal guide in the real law. All precedent in this country contradicts such an idea. The present generation of distinguished lawyers, as well as that which has just passed away, have given ample proofs of their familiarity with the writings of lord Coke; and our numerous volumes of reports daily illustrate that, with trivial exceptions, what is the law of real property at Westminster Hall, is equally so in the various tribunals throughout our extensive country.
What Shakespeare has been to literature, what Bacon has been to philosophy, what the translators of the Authorized Version of the Bible have been to religion, Coke has been to the public and private law of England.
You will recollect that, before the revolution, Coke Littleton was the universal elementary book of Law Students; and a sounder whig never wrote, nor of profounder learning in the orthodox doctrines of the British constitution, or in what were called English liberties.
The age of Elizabeth and James was a better and brighter era in the history of the English law, and it received uncommon splendour from the philosophy of Bacon, and the erudition of Coke. Lord Bacon's Equity Ordinances, his Maxims and Law Tracts, are fitted to employ and exercise the deepest meditation, and, together with the Commentaries of lord Coke, ought to be studied and mastered by every lawyer who means to be well acquainted with the reasons and grounds of the law, and to adorn the noble science he professes.
James Kent, An Address Delivered Before the Law Association of the City of New-York, October 21st, 1836 (1836), p. 13
Lord Coke's Institutes have had a most extensive and permanent influence on the common law of England. The first part is a commentary upon Littleton's Tenures; and notwithstanding the magnitude of the work, it has reached seventeen editions. Many of the doctrines which his writings explain and illustrate, have become obsolete, or have been swept away by the current of events. The influence of two centuries must inevitably work a great revolution in the laws and usages, as well as in the manners and taste of a nation. Perhaps every thing useful in the Institutes of Coke may be found more methodically arranged, and more interestingly taught, in the modern compilations and digests; yet his authority on all subjects connected with the ancient law, is too great and too venerable to be neglected.
James Kent, Commentaries on American Law, Volume I (6th ed. 1848), p. 505
His commentary upon magna charta, and particularly on the celebrated 29th chapter, is deeply interesting to the lawyers of the present age, as well from the value and dignity of the text, as the spirit of justice and of civil liberty which pervades and animates the work. In this respect, Lord Coke eclipses his contemporary and great rival. Lord Bacon, who was as inferior to Coke in a just sense and manly vindication of the freedom and privileges of the subject, as he was superior in general science and philosophy. Lord Coke, in a very advanced age, took a principal share in proposing and framing the celebrated Petition of Right, containing a parliamentary sanction of those constitutional limitations upon the royal prerogative, which were deemed essential to the liberties of the nation.
James Kent, Commentaries on American Law, Volume I (6th ed. 1848), p. 506
Even in the days of Elizabeth and James I Sir Edward Coke, the incarnate common law, shovels out his enormous learning in vast disorderly heaps.
Frederic William Maitland, 'Outlines of English Legal History, 560–1600', in H. A. L. Fisher (ed.), The Collected Papers of Frederic William Maitland: Volume II (1911), p. 484
The Work itself is one which cannot be too highly prized, or too earnestly recommended to the diligent study of all who wish to be well grounded in legal principles. For myself, I agree with Mr. Butler in the opinion that HE IS THE BEST LAWYER, WHO BEST UNDERSTANDS COKE UPON LITTLETON—and I think no little of the superficiality which has sometimes been thought to characterize the present bar in contrast with those who have immediately preceded it, is to be attributed to their not having early become familiar with the Institutes... It may be that the original wants method; but the life and spirit of it are lost when it is hacked to pieces to be refitted together upon a new and different skeleton. Lord Coke was deeply imbued with the love of his profession, and one of the advantages derived from the study of his works is, that somewhat of the same spirit is insensibly transferred to his readers.
George Sharswood, letter (31 October 1854), quoted in Robert H. Small's Law Catalogue (1858), p. 54
Coke's Institutes have had a greater influence on the law of England than any work written between the days of Bracton and those of Blackstone.
Quotes reported in James William Norton-Kyshe, The Dictionary of Legal Quotations (1904), p. 30-31.
The greatest lawyer, Sir Edward Coke.
Mallet, J., Harrison's Case (1660), 5 How. St. Tr. 1030.
The learning and industry of that great man Sir Edward Coke, whose name ought never to be mentioned in a Court of law without the highest respect.
Eyre, C.J., Jefferson v. Bishop of Durham (1797), 2 Bos. & Pull. 123.
Jeo concede que est le opinion Seigniour Coke, mes salva reverentia al ey grand sage et pere del ley. (I grant that it is the opinion of Lord Coke, but salva reverentia to so great a sage and father of the law).
John Vaughan, J., Tustian v. Roper (1670), Jones's (Sir Thos.) Rep. 35.
That great lawyer was much heated in the controversy between the Courts at Westminster and the Ecclesiastical Courts. In every part of his conduct his passions influenced his judgment. Vir acer et vehemens. His law was continually warped by the different situations in which he found himself.
Heath, J., Jefferson v. Bishop of Durham (1797), 2 Bos. & Pull. 131.
Don't quote the distinction, for the honour of my lord Coke.
Lord Mansfield, Campbell v. Hall (1774), Lofft. 16. Exclamation in reference to Calvin's Case (7 Co. 17), wherein appears a distinction between counties vesting by conquest and descent. It was argued that "the doctrine imputed to the Judges by my Lord Coke was not entirely extra judicial," and this brought forth the above remark.
Yet we are obliged, to regard a man with so little about him that is ornamental or entertaining, or attractive, as a very considerable personage in the history of his country. Belonging to an age of gigantic intellect and gigantic attainments, he was admired by his contemporaries, and time has in no degree impaired his fame. He is most familiar to us as an author. Smart legal practitioners, who are only desirous of making money by their profession, neglect his works, and sneer at them as pedantic and antiquated; but they continue to be studied by all who wish to know the history and to acquire a scientific and liberal knowledge of our judicial and political institutions. His Opus Magnum is this Commentary upon Littleton, which in itself may be said to contain the whole common law of England as it then existed. Notwithstanding its want of method and its quaintness, the author writes from such a full mind, with such mastery over his subject, and with such unbroken spirit, that every law student who has made, or is ever likely to make, any proficiency, must peruse him with delight.
Lord Campbell, Lives of the Chief Justices, Vol. 1, 338.