Remove ads
Political term From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
A write-in candidate is a candidate whose name does not appear on the ballot but seeks election by asking voters to cast a vote for the candidate by physically writing in the person's name on the ballot. Depending on electoral law it may be possible to win an election by winning a sufficient number of such write-in votes, which count equally as if the person were formally listed on the ballot.
Writing in a name that is not already on the election ballot is considered a practice of the United States. However, some other jurisdictions have allowed this practice. In the United States, there are variations in laws governing write-in candidates, depending on the office (federal or local) and whether the election is a primary election or the general election; general practice is an empty field close by annotated to explain its purpose on the ballot if it applies. In five U.S. states there are no elections to which it can apply, under their present laws. Election laws are enacted by each state and in the District of Columbia, to apply to their voters.
Some U.S. states and local jurisdictions allow a voter to affix a sticker, with the write-in candidate's name, to the ballot in lieu of actually writing in the candidate's name.
Write-in candidacies are sometimes a result of a candidate being legally or procedurally ineligible to run under their own name or party; write-in candidacies may be permitted where term limits bar an incumbent candidate from being officially nominated for, or being listed on the ballot for, re-election. They are also typically used when a candidate, often an incumbent has lost a primary election but still wishes to contest the general election.
In some cases, write-in campaigns have been organized to support a candidate who is not personally involved in running; this may be a form of draft campaign.
Write-in candidates have won elections on rare occasions. Also, write-in votes are sometimes cast for ineligible people or fictional characters.
Some jurisdictions require write-in candidates be registered as official candidates before the election.[1] This is standard in elections with a large pool of potential candidates, as there may be multiple candidates with the same name that could be written in.
In some cases, the number of write-in votes cast in an election is greater than the entire margin of victory, suggesting that the write-ins may have been sufficient to tip the balance and change the outcome of the election by creating a spoiler effect.[2]
Many U.S. states and municipalities allow for write-in votes in a partisan primary election where no candidate is listed on the ballot to have the same functional effect as nominating petitions: for example, if there are no Reform Party members on the ballot for state general assembly and a candidate receives more than 200 write-in votes when the primary election is held (or the other number of signatures that were required for ballot access), the candidate will be placed on the ballot on that ballot line for the general election. In most places, this provision is in place for non-partisan elections as well.
A write-in option may occasionally be available in a multiple-choice referendum; for example in the January 1982 Guamanian status referendum.
The term "write-in candidate" is used in elections in which names of candidates or parties are preprinted on a paper ballot or displayed on an electronic voting machine. The term is not generally used in elections in which all ballots are blank and thus all voters must write in the names of their preferred candidates. Blank ballot election systems reduce the cost of printing the ballots, but increase the complexity of casting and counting votes. Such systems are used in Japan,[3] and were used in the past in the French Second Republic[4] and in elections in the Philippines from World War II until the 2010 general election.[5] Some systems use a semi-blank ballot, such as Finland, where the voter must fill in a candidate's given number or letter from a separate ballot, but where there is a clear-cut arrangement with a circle or box with a description of how to vote for a given candidate.[6] Blank-ballot systems typically require candidates to be nominated in advance.
Registration not required | |
Registration required | |
Write-in not allowed for president, registration required for other offices | |
Write-in only allowed for substitutes | |
Write-in not allowed |
The requirements to appear on the general election ballot as an independent candidate or to have write-in votes counted vary by state and by political office sought.
As of 2024, 40 states and the District of Columbia allow write-in votes on their ballots, including for president; Alaska, New Mexico and South Carolina allow write-in candidates for some offices but not for president; Mississippi allows write-in votes only to substitute a candidate listed on the ballot who was removed, withdrew or died; Arkansas, Hawaii, Louisiana, Nevada, Oklahoma and South Dakota do not allow any write-in votes. Most of the jurisdictions allowing write-in votes require that the write-in candidates register by a certain date for their votes to be counted. Typically this registration consists only of a declaration of candidacy, but some states also require signatures of a certain number of voters, additional paperwork or fees. The deadline to register as a write-in candidate is usually later than to petition to be listed on the ballot.
State or district | Petition to be listed on ballot | Registration as write-in candidate | Sources | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
signatures | fee | deadline | signatures | fee | deadline | ||
Alabama | 5,000 | — | August 15 | Registration not required | [7][8] | ||
Alaska | 3,614 | — | August 7 | Write-in not allowed for president | [9][10] | ||
Arizona | 42,303 | — | August 17 | — | — | September 26 | [11][12] |
Arkansas | 5,000 | — | August 5 | Write-in not allowed | [13][14] | ||
California | 219,403 | — | August 9 | — | — | October 22 | [15][16] |
Colorado | 12,000[a] | — | July 11 | — | — | July 18 | [17][18] |
Connecticut | 7,500 | — | August 7[b] | — | — | October 7 | [19][20] |
Delaware | 7,690[c] | — | September 3 | — | — | September 20 | [21][23] |
District of Columbia | 4,573 | — | August 7 | — | — | November 12 | [24] |
Florida | 145,040 | — | July 15 | — | — | July 2 | [25] |
Georgia | 7,500 | — | June 21[d] | — | — | September 3[e] | [26][27] |
Hawaii | 5,798 | — | August 7 | Write-in not allowed | [28] | ||
Idaho | 1,000 | — | March 15 | — | — | September 6 | [29][30] |
Illinois | 25,000 | — | June 24 | — | — | September 5 | [31] |
Indiana | 36,943 | — | July 1 | — | — | July 3 | [32] |
Iowa | 3,500[f] | — | August 24 | Registration not required | [33][34] | ||
Kansas | 5,000 | — | August 5 | — | $20 | October 14 | [35] |
Kentucky | 5,000 | $500 | September 6 | — | $50 | October 25 | [36][37] |
Louisiana[g] | 5,000[h] | — | July 24 | Write-in not allowed | [38][39] | ||
— | $500 | August 23 | |||||
Maine | 4,000 | — | July 25 | — | — | August 27 | [40][41] |
Maryland | 10,000 | — | July 1 | — | — | October 17[i] | [42] |
Massachusetts | 10,000 | — | July 30 | — | — | September 6 | [43] |
Michigan | 12,000[j] | — | July 18 | — | — | August 31 | [44] |
Minnesota | 2,000 | — | August 20 | — | — | October 29 | [45] |
Mississippi | 1,000 | $2,500 | September 6 | Write-in only allowed for substitutes | [46][47] | ||
Missouri | 10,000 | — | July 29 | — | — | October 25 | [48][49] |
Montana | 5,000 | $1,740[k] | August 14 | — | $1,740 | September 10 | [50] |
Nebraska | 2,500 | — | August 1 | — | — | October 25 | [51][52] |
Nevada | 10,096[l] | $250 | August 9 | Write-in not allowed | [53][55] | ||
New Hampshire | 3,000[m] | $250 | August 7 | Registration not required | [56][57] | ||
New Jersey | 800 | — | July 29 | Registration not required | [58][59] | ||
New Mexico | 3,561 | — | June 27 | Write-in not allowed for president | [60] | ||
New York | 45,000[n] | — | May 28 | — | — | October 15 | [61][62] |
North Carolina | 83,188[o] | — | March 5 | 500 | — | July 23[p] | [65][64] |
North Dakota | 4,000 | — | September 3 | — | — | October 15 | [66] |
Ohio | 5,000 | — | August 7 | — | — | August 26 | [67] |
Oklahoma[g] | 34,599 | — | July 15 | Write-in not allowed | [68][69] | ||
— | $35,000 | ||||||
Oregon | 23,744[q] | — | August 13 | Registration not required | [70][71] | ||
Pennsylvania | 5,000 | $200 | August 1 | Registration not required | [72][73] | ||
Rhode Island | 1,000 | — | June 26 | Registration not required | [74][75] | ||
South Carolina | 10,000 | — | July 15 | Write-in not allowed for president | [76] | ||
South Dakota | 3,502 | — | August 6 | Write-in not allowed | [77] | ||
Tennessee | 275 | — | August 15 | — | — | September 18 | [78] |
Texas | 113,151 | — | May 13 | — | — | August 19 | [79] |
Utah | 1,000 | $500 | June 18 | — | $500 | September 3 | [80][81][82] |
Vermont | 1,000 | — | August 1 | Registration not required | [83] | ||
Virginia | 5,000[r] | — | August 23 | — | — | October 28 | [84][85] |
Washington | 1,000 | — | July 17[s] | — | — | November 5 | [86] |
West Virginia | 7,947 | $2,500 | August 1 | — | — | September 17 | [87][88] |
Wisconsin | 2,000 | — | August 6 | — | — | October 22 | [89] |
Wyoming | 3,891 | $750 | August 26 | Registration not required | [90][91] |
In 2010, California voters passed Proposition 14 which set up a new election system for the United States Senate, United States House of Representatives, all statewide offices (governor, lieutenant governor, secretary of state, state treasurer, state controller, attorney general, insurance commissioner, and superintendent of public instruction), California Board of Equalization, and for the California State Legislature. In the system set up by Proposition 14, there are two rounds of voting, and the top two vote-getters for each race in the first round (the primary, held in June 2004 – 2018 and March 2020–present) advance to a second round (the general election, held in November). Proposition 14 specifically prohibits write-in candidates in the second round, and this prohibition was upheld in a court challenge.[155] Another court challenge to the prohibition on write-in candidates in the second round was filed in July 2014.[156]
Although Proposition 14 prohibits write-in candidates in the second round of voting, it has created conditions that can make it easier for write-in candidates in the first round to advance to the second round. This generally happens in elections where only one candidate is listed on the ballot. Since in each race the top two vote-getters from the first round are guaranteed to advance to the second round, if only one candidate is listed on the ballot, a write-in candidate can easily advance to the second round, as the write-in candidate would only have to compete with other write-in candidates for the second spot, not with any listed candidates. In some jungle primary systems, if the winner in the first round wins by more than 50% of the vote, then the second (runoff) round gets cancelled, but in the system set up by Proposition 14, a second (runoff) round is required regardless of the percent of the vote that the winner of the first round received. Proposition 14 therefore guarantees that if only one candidate is listed on the ballot in the first round, a write-in candidate running against the one listed candidate can earn a spot for the second round with as little as one vote.[n 1]
The first election in which Proposition 14 went into effect was the 2012 elections.
California elections in which primary election write-in candidates advanced to the general election | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Year | Number of write-in candidates who successfully made it to the November general election | Offices for which write-in candidates successfully made it to the November general election | General election results for candidates who qualified as write-in candidates in the primaries | Links to election results | ||||
Wins | Max | Average | Min | Primary (March/June) | General (November) | |||
2012 | 5 | SD3, SD9, SD33, AD15, AD31 | 0 | 36.0% | 23.4% | 13.2% | [157] | [158] |
2014 | 16[159] | CD23, CD44, BOE3, SD16, SD22, SD36, AD5, AD14, AD21, AD31, AD41, AD51, AD60, AD67, AD75, AD76 | 0 | 46.6% | 31.3% | 13.3% | [160] | [161] |
2016 | 15[n 2] | CD14, SD33, AD1, AD2, AD7, AD32, AD46, AD49, AD51, AD58, AD62, AD70, AD73, AD76 | 0 | 43.9% | 28.5% [n 3] |
13.9% [n 3] |
[162] | [163] |
2018 | 12 | CD13, CD19, CD32, AD4, AD7, AD20, AD21, AD27, AD51, AD61, AD64, AD69 | 0 | 32.6% | 23.6% | 11.6% | [164] | [165] |
2020 | 11 | SD3, SD9, SD25, SD31, SD33, SD39, AD7, AD11, AD17, AD21, AD45 | 0 | 41.0% | 30.8% | 11.1% | [166] | [167] |
2022 | 11 | SD24, SD26, AD8, AD9, AD14, AD18, AD41, AD43, AD48, AD54, AD59 | 0 | 40.0% | 25.8% | 10.1% | [168] | [169] |
With a few exceptions, the practice of recognizing write-in candidates is typically viewed internationally as a tradition in the United States.[170][171]
Seamless Wikipedia browsing. On steroids.
Every time you click a link to Wikipedia, Wiktionary or Wikiquote in your browser's search results, it will show the modern Wikiwand interface.
Wikiwand extension is a five stars, simple, with minimum permission required to keep your browsing private, safe and transparent.