Loading AI tools
Thank you for uploading Image:Randknight.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. J Milburn (talk) 14:25, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
- Sorry about that. WPjcmWords are cool 01:38, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
JCM. Raiku Lucifer Samiyaza 00:16, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
- Hi there. Congratulations on the new rollback ability. WPjcmWords are cool 00:18, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
Hi. I noticed you are welcoming lots of new users. Welcoming new users is great, I do quite a bit of it myself, but ask yourself, is there a purpose to welcoming users that have created an account, but have not made a single edit yet? Strangely, there are hundreds of such accounts created every week. They create an account and then don't go on to actually use it. Creating talk pages for such users takes up (albeit a tiny amount) space on Wikipedia servers, and such pages are often simply deleted later if the user never comes back and actually edits. It is generally a good idea to welcome users only after they have made at least one edit, so that we know we are actually welcoming a new user, not talking to thin air. Just a thought, keep up the friendly attitude! Beeblebrox (talk) 19:05, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
- OK, I see. I'll only create talk pages for users that edit at least one page. WPjcmWords are cool 19:07, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
So when you removed usage categories from those software userboxes yesterday... was there any consensus in general? Which part of WP:UBX do they contravene? They've been there for some time so if they didn't abide by policy they'd have been removed already, I suppose. Besides the fact that it's ironic that you still categorize your own userpage with one of the categories you removed you do know that usually you go through a categories for discussion process before doing a mass recategorization or removal, yes? -- Mentisock 09:28, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
- Actually, WP:UBX said in bold words "Userboxes should not automatically include categories." Also, there have been a few userbox templates that had a category in <includeonly>s removed to abide by that rule. I'm just finishing some more of the job. WPjcmWords are cool 22:19, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on SmackJeeves, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. TheWeakWilled 21:06, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
Hello WPjcm, and thanks for your work patrolling new changes. I am just informing you that I declined the speedy deletion of Webcomics Nation - a page you tagged - because: Not unambiguous advertising. Please review the criteria for speedy deletion before tagging further pages. If you have any questions or problems, please let me know. SoWhy 18:29, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
Hello WPjcm, and thanks for your work patrolling new changes. I am just informing you that I declined the speedy deletion of FictionPress - a page you tagged - because: Over a million original works does rather make a credible assertion of notability. PROD or take to AfD if required. If you have any questions or problems, please let me know. GedUK 20:42, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
Message added 13:43, 27 December 2009 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
I have removed the proposed deletion tag you placed on Ghastly's Ghastly Comic because the article was discussed at articles for deletion and is therefore permanently ineligible under the proposed deletion process. I only did this to comply with policy and have no opinion one way or the other on the merits of the deletion nomination. If you wish to pursue deletion, please open another deletion discussion. —KuyaBriBriTalk 13:49, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Wikia. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. J (t) 15:35, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
What's the dispute with Rugrats? I saw you added the template, but you didn't give any reason in your edit summary or on the talk page. I happened to notice as I was scrolling the talk page that it passed the neutrality section in its GA review, so please specify. Paper Luigi T • C 03:52, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
- It was actually just a particular section that I found to be non-neutral. I went ahead and moved the template. ~jcm 03:58, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Adrianne Wadewitz is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adrianne Wadewitz until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Beerest 2 Talk page 02:09, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
Message added 10:59, 17 August 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
I had misread the sentence, and for some reason thought it read "one of the top-rated" instead of simply "the top-rated." So, yes, it turns out you were right all along. Oops! Davejohnsan (talk) 03:41, 3 July 2015 (UTC)
- No problem. I'm glad you caught the mistake. ~jcm 18:12, 3 July 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:47, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello, WPjcm. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello, WPjcm. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello, WPjcm. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
| Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
The redirect EditThis.info has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 18 § EditThis.info until a consensus is reached. PleaseStand (talk) 11:40, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Wikiwand in your browser!
Seamless Wikipedia browsing. On steroids.
Every time you click a link to Wikipedia, Wiktionary or Wikiquote in your browser's search results, it will show the modern Wikiwand interface.
Wikiwand extension is a five stars, simple, with minimum permission required to keep your browsing private, safe and transparent.
