Loading AI tools
I have noticed on a few articles that you have created that the interwiki links [[fr:french equivalent]] have been placed before the category. I have fixed the ones that Wikiproject Check Wikipedia has identified . Please place the interwikis at the end of the articles you create, thank you.Naraht (talk) 15:24, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
The May 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 03:32, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
File:H75982.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:HMS Northumberland 1890 USNHC NH 75982.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:HMS Northumberland 1890 USNHC NH 75982.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 13:58, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
- File:Hilariontemptation.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Hilariontemptation.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 23:14, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
- File:PaintbyNumbers10rs.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Temptation of Saint Hilarion.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 23:23, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
- File:Indidle2.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Indidle2.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:33, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
- File:IMG 4972.JPG is now available as Commons:File:Site of St Olave Silver Street.JPG. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 21:11, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
- File:IMG 4461.JPG is now available as Commons:File:St Botolph Aldersgate west front.JPG. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 12:32, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
- File:IMG 4470.JPG is now available as Commons:File:St Botolph Aldersgate from Postmans Park.JPG. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 12:33, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
- File:IMG 4380.JPG is now available as Commons:File:St Lawrence Jewry.JPG. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 12:51, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
- File:SavoyChapel.jpg is now available as Commons:File:SavoyChapel.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 16:30, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
- File:IMG 6713.JPG is now available as Commons:File:St Michaels Church Camden Town.JPG. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 16:34, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
- File:Mw60446.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Tomb of John Tradescant the elder and John Tradescant the younger.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 17:12, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
- File:Paris-Ponts-StMichel.png is now available as Commons:File:Paris-Ponts-StMichel.png. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 06:41, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
- File:Paris-Ponts-StLouis.png is now available as Commons:File:Paris-Ponts-StLouis.png. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 06:42, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
- File:Paris-Ponts-Petit.png is now available as Commons:File:Paris-Ponts-Petit.png. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 06:43, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
- File:Paris-Ponts-National.png is now available as Commons:File:Paris-Ponts-National.png. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 06:43, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
- File:Paris-Ponts-Concorde.png is now available as Commons:File:Paris-Ponts-Concorde.png. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 06:44, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
Hello from the Opera Project. I'm writing to all members on the active list to let them know that we could use your input on several issues currently under discussion on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Opera:
- The use of italics in article titles
- Possible changes to the article guidelines concerning "Selected Recordings"
- Suggestions for the July Composer of the Month and Opera of the Month
Please drop by if you have the time. Best, Voceditenore (talk) 08:38, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
made a pass per your request, do you want the coat of arms stuff? (i left out) thanks for the credit template for talk page. i'll go through les duc de mouchy. lot's of french nobility work to do Pohick2 (talk) 21:40, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
The June 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 23:27, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
| The Christianity WikiProject Newsletter | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||
John Carter (talk) 23:02, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
You began the project City of Rome. The project is not completly defunct. I am not clear if you are still running the project or if there actualy is a particular editor that runs projects or if they simply take on a life of their own.
If you have lost interest in the project I wanted to take over and perhaps begin to learn how to expand and build other projects.
If you are still intending to run the project please let me know if my work and changes to templates (Roman Monuments} are OK.--Amadscientist (talk) 00:57, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:GWhitehead.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 06:11, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
Would you be so nice and have a look on the article "Cranbrook Schools"? Another user constantly tries to change the article into an older version and I don´t know if he is right with doing that. I would appreciate your opinion on that!Thanks very much in advance!--92.227.212.128 (talk) 09:42, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
Please see: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Biographical Dictionary of the Extreme Right Since 1890 (2nd nomination), which you contributed to. Steve Dufour (talk) 03:21, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:RomansLanding.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 04:44, 5 August 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice?--Jappalang (talk) 04:44, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:RomansLanding.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 04:44, 5 August 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
The July 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 20:31, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
Please translate this text from your article: I francesi la mattina del 22 aprile portarono alcuni cannoni presso porta San Zeno con l'intenzione di abbatterla, e furono fermati grazie a dei fortunati colpi di cannone sparati dalle mura da alcuni cittadini, che li obbligarono nuovamente, così, a ritirarsi. Intanto i francesi all'interno di Castel Vecchio erano in grave difficoltà, tanto che alcuni soldati fuggirono dal ponte scaligero. Ci fu anche un tentativo mal riuscito di riconquistare il colle San Leonardo. La polvere da sparo e le munizioni stavano però scarseggiando, ma anche il cibo cominciava a non essere più sufficiente per la popolazione, dato che la città si era riempita di volontari e soldati. Il Senato inviò addirittura una lettera in cui invitava la città alla resa, per cui le maggiori authorità a Verona si riunirono per decidersi sul da farsi. Durante la riunione si arrivò alla conclusione che ormai non sarebbero giunti rinforzi, per cui bisognava cominciare a prepararsi per la resa: i capi militari andarono per le strade invitando a fermare i combattimenti: molti ufficiali Veneti uscirono e così influenzati dalle Venete Cariche, scorsero le contrade tutte di Verona proclamando una tregua conclusa, ed esortando tutti gli abitanti a desistere da qualunque atto di ostilità, poiché trattavasi di pace, né tardarono i migliori tra i cittadini ad unirsi a loro onde calmare il popolo, infruttuosi non furono i loro consigli e la moltitudine si lasciò persuadere dalle voci della ragione e delle necessità: paga di non abbandonare i suoi posti di difesa, vi si tenne tranquilla, e non tirò più un colpo di cannone o di fucile. Così ebbe fine una battaglia, la quale principata entro le nostre mura alle ore ventuna italiane[29] del giorno 17 aprile era durata senza interruzione sino presso alle ore parimenti ventuna[29] del giorno 23. Allo strepito delle armi, al clamore delle voci, al movimento continuo di una numerosa popolazione, successero un cupo silenzio, un nesto riposo, una ferale immobilità.[30]
Il valore mostrato dai veronesi, che riuscirono a contrastare le incursioni di pattuglie francesi e a sopportare il cannoneggiamento della città, non avrebbe potuto resistere però all'assedio di 15.000 soldati,[31] per cui il 23 aprile era ormai presa la decisione della resa, si inviò quindi un messaggio a Balland in cui si richiedeva un armistizio di 24 ore. Il comandante concesse allora una tregua sino al mezzogiorno del giorno seguente.
Alla fine le morti francesi ammontarono a 500 soldati,[32] i feriti furono circa un migliaio, e i prigionieri 2.400 (di cui 500 soldati e 1.900 loro famigliari).[33] Dunque dei 3.000 soldati francesi di guarnigione[34] circa mille (tra morti e prigionieri) furono messi fuori combattimento.
I have nominated Category:Naval lists (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for merging into Category:Military lists (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Octane (talk) 23:34, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Francis I of Beauharnais requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Ironholds (talk) 19:26, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on William IV Beauharnais requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Ironholds (talk) 19:26, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on William III Beauharnais requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Ironholds (talk) 19:26, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Jean Beauharnais, seigneur de Miramion requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Ironholds (talk) 19:26, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on William II Beauharnais requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Ironholds (talk) 19:26, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on William I Beauharnais requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Ironholds (talk) 19:27, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
Neddy, an article I recently created, Princess Maria Adelgunde of Hohenzollern-Sigmaringen, has been nominated for deletion here: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Princess Maria Adelgunde of Hohenzollern-Sigmaringen. Please take the time to weigh in and stop its deletion. Thanks again for all your wonderful contributions to Wikipedia! Caponer (talk) 17:05, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
Template:La Monnaie company has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Jafeluv (talk) 11:59, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
Template:Acadfrcat has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Locos epraix ~ Beastepraix 17:27, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
Hello,
I saw you translate articles from French Wikipedia. It would be nice to indicate in the discussion page that they are translations. I did it for Petites écoles de Port-Royal and Solitaires of Port-Royal, could you think to do for other items you translate? It is important to respect the license. Thank you, --Serein (talk) 23:42, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process has started; to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on 12 September!
Many thanks, Roger Davies talk 04:24, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
The August 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 20:46, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
I've started a discussion at Talk:Raoul IV de Conches, hoping to get a consensus for standardizing the numbering of the various Raouls and Rogers in House of Tosny-related articles. Since I am just a careful observer and not an expert on the topic, I thought I'd solicit your opinion on the subject there since you have been a significant contributor to this group of articles. Thanks. Koumz (talk) 21:58, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Gladiator Last Days of Pompeii 001.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 15:29, 16 September 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 15:29, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
Voting in the Military history WikiProject coordinator election has now started. The aim is to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months from a pool of sixteen candidates. Please vote here by 23:59 (UTC) on 26 September!
For the coordinators, Roger Davies talk 22:09, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
Template:Art of ancient Egypt has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Locos epraix ~ Beastepraix 02:28, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
The September 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 02:21, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
I have nominated Bernard Lens, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bernard Lens. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. –Juliancolton | Talk 02:56, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
Hello Neddyseagoon, where did you get this information from: The Earl of Arundel owned seventeen paintings by Ovens. Can you supply us with a link, a reference to this inventory? I was not able to find anything on internet. There are too many dukes of Norfolk, Arundel's, I need a better clue. Greetings from AmsterdamTaksen (talk) 07:08, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
Hello. I noticed that you have a user la-4 template on your Babel. I was wondering if you would be willing to translate my username into Latin (for Vicipaedia and for personal knowledge). I know "Weak" is debilis and "Willed" is animus. So would it be animus debilus since animus is second declension singular? Thanks. TheWeakWilled (T * G) 00:56, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
As a member of the Military history WikiProject or World War I task force, you may be interested in competing in the Henry Allingham International Contest! The contest aims to improve article quality and member participation within the World War I task force. It will also be a step in preparing for Operation Great War Centennial, the project's commemorative effort for the World War I centenary.
If you would like to participate, please sign up by 11 November 2009, 00:00, when the first round is scheduled to begin! You can sign up here, read up on the rules here, and discuss the contest here!
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 19:56, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
The October 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 19:56, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
The article A Clue: No has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- nn tv episode
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Oo7565 (talk) 21:34, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
 |
On November 21, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Maison royale de Saint-Louis, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Materialscientist (talk) 13:14, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
Category:Cook Baronets, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you.
Category:Parliamentary constituency of Salisbury, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you.
You created this category. What is its scope? Is it the French department or, more broadly, the region bordering the narrow bit of the English Channel? Either way, it could be stated on the category page. Folks at 137 (talk) 14:22, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Lincoln 128.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. FASTILYsock(TALK) 08:38, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
The November 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 19:21, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:LouiseBayern.jpg is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.
If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.
If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Krinkle (talk) 21:42, 22 December 2009 (UTC)The December 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 04:02, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
Your input would be appreciated at
- Wikipedia:Reference desk/Humanities#How many official Dictators to time of Roman Empire
- Wikipedia:Reference desk/Humanities#"lex Junia Licinia"
- Thanks.--Doug Coldwell talk 20:41, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
An editor has nominated Louis René Quentin de Richebourg de Champcenetz, an article which you have created or worked on, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Louis René Quentin de Richebourg de Champcenetz and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also edit the article during the discussion to address the nominator's concerns but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. - Eastmain (talk) 06:10, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Puccio Pucci (lawyer). Our verifiability policy requires that all content be cited to a reliable source. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:10, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
I have started editing this article Henry_Perigal_Borrell since he is a relative (quite distant, but on the tree!).
See this entry
I used to work at UCL and my brother in law studied Ancient History / Classics too! Gordo (talk) 15:20, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
Thanks. Having been an editor in both articles was founding it difficult to carve up my work. AshLin (talk) 15:30, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
Please see our project's talk page for a discussion of the possible changes to Wikipedia's policy on the biographies of living persons and the implications this will have for many articles under the project's banner. This is especially important if you are looking after or have created unreferenced or minimally referenced opera-related biographies of living people. Voceditenore (talk) 16:26, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
Hello Neddyseagoon! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 26 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 669 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:
- Jean Tulard - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
- Wolfgang Heinz (criminologist) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
- Wolfgang Heinz (politician) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
- Jean-Michel Wilmotte - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
- Eugène Dodeigne - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
- Bernard Lancelot - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
- Serge Duigou - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
- Alain Pasquier - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
- Stephen Wakelam - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
- Peter Price (film editor) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
More... |
|---|
|
Can you take a look at this page and fact check and generally improve the page? I don't know much about the subject matter, and so far I have drawn mostly from the old DNB and Encyclopædia Brittanica at Wikisource. You are listed at WP:MA as having a particular interest in the First Barons' War, so I thought you would know about the subject. Thanks, —innotata (Talk • Contribs) 01:50, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
What on earth is a "Roman Catholic Church painter"? This is an absolutely ridiculous category, particularly as it now includes Leonardo who never painted a church in his life and Cellini who was primarily a goldsmith.
A number of artists on the list painted works on panel or canvas which were used in churches as altarpieces. But very very few of them actually painted any part of a church building. I put it to you that it is a useless category, because no-one is likely to look it up. Not unless they are looking for a skilled tradesman who doesn't mind working on a very long ladder. And I do mean tradesman, not artist. A "church painter" fits into the same sort of bracket as a "piano removalist". A piano removalist isn't an ordinary removalist; he owns a piano trolley and piano straps and knows how to get your baby grand over the appartment balcony and your Flemish harpsichord onto the the top floor of an Amsterdam warehouse. Likewise a "church painter" (Roman Catholic or otherwise) is someone who can do wood grain, gold leaf and intaglio finishes. This "Roman Catholic" stuff has gone too far altogether!
For example, it is the opinion of some that regardless of what church Michelangelo was baptised into, he had actually become Protestant, and this is strongly supported by the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel which contains absolutely no reference to Roman Catholic dogma whatsoever. It is the opinion of others that regardless of what Leonardo da Vinci was baptised, he actually belonged to an heretical sect called the Cathars. There are others who are equally certain that although Leonardo may have been baptised at his father's wish, he was actually raised as a Jew by his mother. (Just think about the long hair and flowing beard at a time when these were uncommon on all but Jews.) Many of the Renaissance painters embraced the Classical Humanist philosophy, and may have been effectively pagans, regardless of what works they were commissioned to do.
The whole category should be disbanded. And as for the recent inclusion of Leonardo as a "Roman Catholic writer", that is ludicrous. Nothing that Leonardo wrote is "Roman Catholic" in nature, except his occassional criticism of the church or monastic life. The category "Roman Catholic writer" ought to include only those people whose works are in some way significant to Roman Catholicism, eg St Augustine, Thomas Aquinas, Voragine etc. Amandajm (talk) 09:57, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
The January 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 04:19, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
Hi I think your picture is back to front. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Colin m wesley (talk • contribs) 14:31, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
Hello Neadyseagoon, can you do me a favour and take a look at Royal Academy of Musick. You will recognize a few people and might be able to add or improve something. Greetings from Amsterdam.Taksen (talk) 10:37, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
I've nominated Anthony Roll for FAC. The nomination can be found at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Anthony Roll/archive1. You are most welcome to contribute to the review of the article.
Hello there - not sure we've spoken over the years. I was just beefing up Alexander Dow with DNB text (about which you are surely aware), and it occurred to me that you might be the sort of person who might be interested in what we do now over at Wikisource, getting the old DNB posted. Drop me a note if you need to know more/haven't already decided to give this great opportunity a miss. Charles Matthews (talk) 21:23, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
Since you have been an active commentator, reviewer or editor of the article Mary Rose, I'd like to announce that it's been nominated for featured article status. The nomination can be found at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Mary Rose/archive1. I would very much appreciate your comments, suggestions for improvement or support of the nomination.
I'm just curious, did Louis of Anjou, Marquis of Pont-à-Mousson have any sons. I'm making a list of members of the Capet dynasty, and since you're the only person that has ever edited the page, I assume you'd know best whether he had any sons or not. Thanks for any help.--Nathan M. Swan (talk) 03:47, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process has started; to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on 8 March 2010! More information on coordinatorship may be found on the coordinator academy course and in the responsibilities section on the coordinator page.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:05, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
The February 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:58, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
I have nominated Category:People related to the OECD (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for renaming to Category:People related to the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 00:34, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
hi. In may 2007 you made this edit to HMS Duke of Wellington,
You state that David Beatty was commander of Wellington from 1900 to 1902. Now, other sources for example, http://www.admirals.org.uk/admirals/fleet/beattyd.php suggest he was on sick leave for these 2 years with an injured arm after being shot at Tsientsin, and do not mention even a placeholding command such as a port ship. I don't know if you can help by saying where the info comes from? (yes, I know, its quite a while ago...) Sandpiper (talk) 10:37, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:IMG 6953.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
PLEASE NOTE:
- I am a bot, and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions.
- I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used once again.
- If you recieved this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
- To opt out of these bot messages, add
{{bots|deny=DASHBot}}to somewhere on your talk page.
A tag has been placed on File:Romanbikini.gif requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. R12056 (talk) 01:05, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
Voting for the Military history WikiProject coordinator elections has opened; all users are encouraged to participate in the elections. Voting will conclude 23:59 (UTC) on 28 March 2010.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:09, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
Hi, I nominated the image for deletion for lacking a source. The mentioned source doesn't exist. Best Hekerui (talk) 10:20, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
Neddy, hi! Were you aware of Talk:British_Museum#Wikipedian_in_Residence? Your dual experience might be useful down the line etc. Cheers Johnbod (talk) 16:26, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
- Hi, Johnbod pointed you out to me - it would be great if you would be interested in helping out on this project! Have a read of my blogposts (refered to at the talk:british museum page). We'll also be organising a range of events that you might be interested in too - first up will be a "backstage pass tour" of the BM on Friday 4th of June. Now, I understand that you've already seen the backstage areas, but nevertheles... Please give me a shout if you think we can do anything together on this, I believe you're the only (former) BM employee who is also a Wikimedian and so your experience with their Copyright/access policies would be invaluable. Witty Lama 00:39, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
I notice that you have a link to your watchlist on your user and talk pages. FYI, I believe it is not possible for another user to view your watchlist (it is regarded as private). As an example, here is mine: Special:Watchlist/Johnuniq (that link will take you to your watchlist). Hope you don't mind this trivia, and I noticed the above since I'm following the Witty Lama residency mentioned in the previous section. Johnuniq (talk) 00:51, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Saintpolroux.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Hekerui (talk) 15:42, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
I have nominated Category:Industry in Ancient Rome (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for renaming to Category:Industry in ancient Rome (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 18:34, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
another ed. nominated this article , which you created some time ago, for proposed deletion. Perhaps it would be possible to make a case that anyone with a portrait by Lawrence is notable, but it does need some sources. You probably have them at hand DGG ( talk ) 03:59, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
The March 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:19, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
Hi,
I am would to contribute to the Roman cities page, especially the ones in Romania.
But I am not sure I understand the categorization. Are you adding the old roman names and then links to articles about the ancient cities, or the current names and links to modern city article?
The Roman towns and cities in Romania has a mix of modern names/articles and ancient names/articles. My suggestion would be to have both old and new, and links to both old and new
Related to it, here is a list of Roman cities from Dacia/Thrace List_of_ancient_cities_in_Thrace_and_Dacia#Roman
Also, is there anywhere a complete list of cities, regardless of country, similar to the page on Dacian cities?
Thanks
The April 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 19:48, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
I recently came across the article William of Nassau (1601–1627) and left a post on the discussion page proposing its renaming to "William of Nassau-Lalecq". After some further digging I noticed that you renamed the article from its original title "William van Nassau, heer van de Lek" which also seems better than what the title is now. I have given my reasons for reverting to the old title on the discussion page. I suggest we continue the discussion there.--Ereunetes (talk) 21:08, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
Dear sir, I stop writting for English wikipedia for a long ago although last month I began contibute at the greek one. I do the catgorization on this encyclopedia. I will be please to tell me your opinion if Romans can be considered as Italians or not. I am asking you since you are wikimember of Wikiproject Ancient Rome. Thanks User:KRBN
The May 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:29, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
Hello! I need some help on English to Latin translation. Please help me to translate the following list of english words to Latin.
- Bishop of Rome
- Ecumenical Patriarch of Constantinople
- Patriarch of Alexandria
- Patriarch of Antioch
- Patriarch of Jerusalem
Category:Asian objects at the British Museum, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Fæ (talk) 06:52, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
Category:Ethnographic objects in the British Museum, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Fæ (talk) 10:33, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
... Egyptian Institute of Sciences and Arts to Commission des Sciences et des Arts. Hope you don't mind. I felt the former name created confusion with Institut d'Egypte -- the two have their overlaps anyway! and I haven't encountered "Egyptian Institute of Sciences and Arts" in other sources. The new name also agrees with the category that already exists. If you think I'm wrong, by all means move back. Andrew Dalby 13:41, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).
Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.
When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.
If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 00:42, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Pascal Coste, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.speedylook.com/Pascal_Coste.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 12:13, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Pascal Coste, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.speedylook.com/Pascal_Coste.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 12:16, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
You might be particularly interested in this....
Wikipedia:GLAM/BM/Hoxne_challenge. Care to get involved? Witty Lama 18:58, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
In response to your edit-summary here – I feel obliged to point out that while it perhaps should not have been described as "bollocks", no part of WP:V says that having once been wrongly called "bollocks" is grounds for inclusion. You provided no reason to replace it, and indeed it was immediately removed by someone else, but please don't insert original research into articles again, even in hidden text. Thanks in advance, ╟─TreasuryTag►Woolsack─╢ 08:26, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
- How very true and well put! You be civil and I'll avoid OR, and we'll all live happily ever after... :-) As you say, the calling it bollocks and the re-inclusion of it are separate issues. I only left it in in hidden text since I'd argue it wasn't unprovable OR on my part but a pretty self-evident fact (what other International Rescue is it going to be?) awaiting a reference, a reference that would to prove it was a deliberate reference on the scriptwriter's part - but I wholly understand that in Wikipedia terms that is pretty much the same as OR and that anything constituting, resembling or encouraging OR has to be avoided at all costs, particularly on Who pages where OR and all sorts of other nasties can get pretty rampant. My apologies and I "won't do it again". :-D Neddyseagoon - talk 12:06, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
- PS - I'ld suggest also that the sentence is one "needs no source because no one is likely to object to it, but we know that sources for that sentence exist", to quote Wikipedia:No original research - but I entirely understand if you and others think not.Neddyseagoon - talk 12:11, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
- The problem is that while this instance is (relatively) non-controversial, it would open the floodgates, and IPs etc. could quite reasonably say, "Why can't I say X because that's probably true as well." And we could really do without all that! ╟─TreasuryTag►estoppel─╢ 12:37, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
- Very true - must stop the slippery slope, and am ready and willing to sacrifice my edit on that altar.Neddyseagoon - talk 13:10, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
- The problem is that while this instance is (relatively) non-controversial, it would open the floodgates, and IPs etc. could quite reasonably say, "Why can't I say X because that's probably true as well." And we could really do without all that! ╟─TreasuryTag►estoppel─╢ 12:37, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
Category:Jewish clergy, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Gnevin (talk) 19:42, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
Category:Jewish clergy, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Gnevin (talk) 19:47, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for the expansion of Pope Joan (2009 film)! I think I created that stub a fair while ago, nice to see it fleshed out now.
One thing, if you based that plot section on the content of the German article, to comply with the CC-by-SA license you'll need to make note of the source in an edit summary. See the WP:Copying within Wikipedia page for more on that.
Thanks, Amalthea 17:34, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
The article Sidi Brahim (wine) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Winery of questionable notability that doesn't appear to have any reliable sources for expansion beyond being an WP:ADVERT
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AgneCheese/Wine 16:49, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
|
|
|
June's contest results plus the latest awards to our members |
|
|
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. | |
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 19:25, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
The article Jean-François Delmas (palaeographer) has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Rettetast (talk) 21:21, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
Category:Horatio Nelson, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 21:47, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
Back in 2006 you have created the bulk of Church of St Michael the Archangel, Framlingham. Some curious typos still give away the original source. Could you please revisit the article and alter/paraphrase/rearrange the contents? I don't feel like writing about art based on someone else's description. Cheers, East of Borschov 17:17, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
The article Cat head (ship) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- No references or sources to back it up. Article has been merged with Cathead.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. :| TelCoNaSpVe :| 22:13, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
The article Andries Pels (1655 – 1731) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Subject seems questionably notable for one event, being rich. Violates inclusion criteria at WP:BIO1E
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. My76Strat 05:42, 8 August 2010 (UTC)
Category:Roman Catholic Church architects, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Occuli (talk) 23:55, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
|
|
|
July's contest results, the latest awards to our members, plus an interview with Parsecboy |
|
|
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. | |
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:44, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
The article Natasha Boyarskaya has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. The-Pope (talk) 16:14, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
Category:Slovakian architecture, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. TheGrappler (talk) 20:12, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
The article Martin Warner has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Lack of sources to support notability
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. RL0919 (talk) 14:56, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
I have nominated Martin Warner, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Martin Warner (2nd nomination). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. RL0919 (talk) 15:24, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Thomas Totty, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.st-george-squadron.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?t=1800.
It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.
If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 12:29, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
Wikiwand in your browser!
Seamless Wikipedia browsing. On steroids.
Every time you click a link to Wikipedia, Wiktionary or Wikiquote in your browser's search results, it will show the modern Wikiwand interface.
Wikiwand extension is a five stars, simple, with minimum permission required to keep your browsing private, safe and transparent.
