Loading AI tools
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:Miranda. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
 |
The Silver Wiki | |
| For your outstanding work on templates, you deserve this - Pheonix15 16:48, 31 August 2007 (UTC) |
- Thanks a lot. Miranda 00:18, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
I noticed the message you recently left to Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Udreams. Please remember to try not to bite the newcomers. If you see someone make a common mistake, try to politely point out what they did wrong and how to correct it. Thank you. I don't generally believe in templating the regulars, but your MFD of User:Udreams is a classic example of how we should not treat new users. Please try to give new users a chance to contribute to the project. After Midnight 0001 13:26, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
- Please don't template the regulars - Thanks. Miranda 20:41, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
- You were not templated. As you can see above, I gave you a customized message. You should be able to see that I said that I don't normally use the templates, but that you deserved a special message. In case it is not clear, the message is "your MFD of User:Udreams is a classic example of how we should not treat new users. Please try to give new users a chance to contribute to the project." --After Midnight 0001 20:49, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
- Okay, well, please try to make contributions which help improve the project instead of templating regulars. Contribute to a WikiProject or something? I don't need someone watching over my edits. I have been/still am going? (me thinks) through that, and it is was hell. Miranda 20:53, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
- Contribute as in writing/correcting grammar in an article. Miranda 20:54, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
- It isn't considered watching over your edits when we are in the same IRC room and you start talking about the MFD that you posted. I don't think that you will find me anywhere near your other edits. --After Midnight 0001 20:56, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
- No, I have other people watching over me, which I am not at liberty to name. And, secondly, I am not going to be active on IRC anymore because it is a waste of time to me. But frankly, don't expand drama over a small incident. Okay, I was wrong, I apologize. Move on. Thank you. Miranda 20:59, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
- Thank you for apologizing. I will consider this done and remove your talk page from my watchlist. --After Midnight 0001 21:07, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
- No, I have other people watching over me, which I am not at liberty to name. And, secondly, I am not going to be active on IRC anymore because it is a waste of time to me. But frankly, don't expand drama over a small incident. Okay, I was wrong, I apologize. Move on. Thank you. Miranda 20:59, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
- Okay, well, please try to make contributions which help improve the project instead of templating regulars. Contribute to a WikiProject or something? I don't need someone watching over my edits. I have been/still am going? (me thinks) through that, and it is was hell. Miranda 20:53, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
- You were not templated. As you can see above, I gave you a customized message. You should be able to see that I said that I don't normally use the templates, but that you deserved a special message. In case it is not clear, the message is "your MFD of User:Udreams is a classic example of how we should not treat new users. Please try to give new users a chance to contribute to the project." --After Midnight 0001 20:49, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
Hi Miranda. I'm surprised that you haven't been messaged about this yet, so I'm going to take the leap and do it myself! I'm going to try to remind you about not biting the newbies. We were all once new here, and we need to try to remember that, and treat others as we would have liked to have been treated. Getting a message about how our user page is about to be deleted just two hours after joining the project is not going to make us want to stay, and I know that it would have made me leave. The damage seems to have been done in this case, and I suspect that we've lost another contributor to Wikipedia, before he's even made any contribs. Wikipedia has a bad enough reputation - we need to actively encourage people to join and help, not drive them away.
However, there may be a way to repair some of the damage. The user who was the target of the MfD has enabled email from other users. I would encourage you to go for this opportunity. Thanks, Martinp23 21:18, 2 September 2007 (UTC).
- I did. See past history. I am archiving this now. This issue is done with me. Miranda 21:23, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
When you create an account at WP:ACC, please place a {{ACC|c}}, not a {{takenote}}. This should mark it for the bot who helps maintain the page and its subpages. Od Mishehu 06:43, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
- Okay, I didn't know. Sorry. Will do that from now on. Cheers. Miranda 08:52, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 36 | 3 September 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |||||||||||||
| Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST | ||||||||||||
|
Ryan Postlethwaite 21:31, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
| |||||||||||||
TrUcO9308 21:44, 6 September 2007 (UTC)Thank You for the banner ad for WikiProject Reggaeton. Um are you interested in joining?
- No thanks, I just made the banner for the project. Miranda 02:04, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
Somehow when I was trying to update the overview template with your newest ad, it showed no image under the ad. That's weird...any clue what's causing it?¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk) 23:26, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
- I had to upload a new version. Miranda 23:29, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
- Oh I see, its appearing fine now. Nice work!¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk) 23:35, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks, I am making professional ads for Meta. More will be coming. Miranda 02:02, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
- Oh I see, its appearing fine now. Nice work!¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk) 23:35, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
Hi Miranda. I was unaware of a sort of "administrative patrol trial" as you mentioned on the Betacommand 2 RfA. Could you provide any further information about that? I was unaware of such a trial, and am curious. Thanks, Iamunknown 02:12, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
- It's a suggested compromise. There is probably such a thing, but you need to ask the arbitration committee for more details. Miranda 08:25, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
Italian translation: "Immagini libere per tutti". Cheers--Nick1915 12:27, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
Done Miranda 18:41, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
 |
My RFA | |
| I thank you for participating in my successful request for adminship, which ended with 60 supports, no opposes, no neutrals, and one abstain. Thank you very much for your thoughtful comments, and I certainly see where you were coming from with your concerns. Edison 17:18, 7 September 2007 (UTC) |
Hi! The text in the image is wrong – it should be libre, not gratis. See Gratis versus Libre. This is quite a fundamental difference.
The banners are great though, and it would be cool if you could make one with Norwegian text as well – the text would be Frie bilder for alle. 
Jon Harald Søby 15:34, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
- I am quite busy right now. And, I just learned that the ads won't be shown universally on the Wikimedia Foundation websites, but rather is optional on blogs/website. Wikipedia is not my full-time job, and I have an avid life outside of Wikipedia. I will see what I can do, but I am not making any promises. Miranda 20:34, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
It got lost in a revert a while ago but I put it in back in June. I reinserted the attribution on the talk page. Thanks for the offer of making a military motif page, but I'll pass, I'm fond of the current version for the time being. When I get sick of it though, I'll probably ask you for a law related page (gavels, and scales of justice etc.) Thanks....⇒ SWATJester Denny Crane. 03:48, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
Hi, I'm just curious why you are criticizing me because of the joke. I wasn't biting him or anything, it was all a joke. Wasn't in anyway serious, all in jest. Cheers,JetLover (Report a mistake) 18:33, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
- If you run for RFA, people may see this as feeding the trolls. Miranda 20:46, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
- How was the other guy trolling? Cheers,JetLover (Report a mistake) 22:36, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
- The edit was later removed by Durin. If someone vandalizes your page, you should revert and ignore. Miranda 02:12, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
- But it wasn't vandalism. (or at least intentional vandalism). Just a joke. It was part of Giggy's australian cabal deal. Cheers,JetLover (Report a mistake) 03:22, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
- The edit was later removed by Durin. If someone vandalizes your page, you should revert and ignore. Miranda 02:12, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
- How was the other guy trolling? Cheers,JetLover (Report a mistake) 22:36, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
(reduce indent) Okay. Well, you also might want to work on making edit summaries. Miranda 04:23, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
Cometstyles has smiled at you and showered you with WikiLove and hopefully this has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:User:Cometstyles/smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
- Thanks. Miranda 20:46, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 37 | 10 September 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. R Delivery Bot 20:49, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
Hello, I noticed that you made a banner ad for the WikiProject Reggaeton and as I work heavily on the WikiProject Food and Drink and have wanted to create a similar promotional item, could you direct me to how one creates such a thing?--Christopher Allen Tanner, CCC 19:15, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
- Here is your answer. Miranda 20:31, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
How do you get the shared IP notice to show up after warnings on IP talk pages? I'll check back here. -- Flyguy649 talk contribs 18:14, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
- WP:TWINKLE. Miranda 18:16, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
Hello Miranda! Gracias por la bienvenida --Libertad y Saber 03:06, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
There is no doubt this user was actively spamming Wikipedia, but I've seen no evidence of sockpuppetry. Can you expand on that? (Please leave me a note when you've answered.) - Mgm|(talk) 09:33, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
i understand about the warnings, but my comments are mine to do with what i wish. donn't stop me removing unwanted comments. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.14.220.47 (talk • contribs)
I haven't followed the Encyclopedist. Is it the AfD or the spoofing that leads you to believe this is a sock? -- Flyguy649 talk contribs 07:21, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
- He has impersonated users before. See the sock list. However, I may be right or wrong. He has copied userpages before to impersonate users, and a first time user wouldn't know what AFD is. However, the person is blocked. Miranda 18:04, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
Hey, Miranda. I was wondering if you'd be willing to make an ad for WikiProject External links. It's a small project that I'm trying to revive, and figured this would be a good way to get it some attention. Thanks, Arky ¡Hablar! 19:54, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
- Ask Persian Poet Gal. I deleted my GIMP files related to Qxz ads ages ago. Miranda 00:47, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
Bushcarrot Talk Please Sign! Let's go Lightning! has smiled at you and showered you with WikiLove and hopefully this has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:User:Cometstyles/smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
- I hope you feel better. Bushcarrot Talk Please Sign! Let's go Lightning! 17:52, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks. I will be less active here though. :-/ Miranda 23:35, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
Compromised?
Oh dear. HalfShadow 23:28, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
- What? Oh, no. Not compromised. I was angry last night and put in a random password. Forgot it, and had a new password sent. Miranda 23:34, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
Cheers, Lights (♣ • ♦) has wished you well! Joy promotes WikiLove and hopefully this little bit has helped make your day better. Spread the WikiJoy by sharing the joy someone else, Try to brighten the day of as many people as you can! Keep up the great editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Joy message}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
- Thanks Lights! Have a wonderful day! Miranda 04:10, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for reverting the edit to my talk page. That IP is a sockpuppet of User:Nam3witha3init. There's a long term vandal who targets Craig Charles and associated articles using 58.84 prefixed IPs or IPs such as the one above registered to Flinders University, if you check the article history it goes back to about July 2006. One Night In Hackney303 01:43, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
- Okay. I just noticed someone with a university IP editing your userpage. Thought something was wrong and reverted it. Glad that I could help. Miranda 04:34, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
I'm seriously thinking of protecting my page, at least for a day or so. He claims he has a life, although apparently its an off night for him tonight if he cannot find anything more fun than vandalizing my user page. KillerChihuahua?!? 02:03, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
- and now I'm back because Jossi tells me I am to thank you for the protection as well! I also note you take wiki-breaks about as successfully as I... I'm not sure whether condolences are in order, but I do know there is no known cure for the disease. thanks again! KillerChihuahua?!? 02:10, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
- No problem. Yes. I am horrible at wikibreaks. Miranda 04:14, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 38 | 17 September 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 03:35, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my user page several times. =) Same person as 144.134.81.204 (talk · contribs) and 144.134.81.190 (talk · contribs). Dial-up account in Australia. =\ -- Gogo Dodo 08:06, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
- Wow. Anytime. Have a good day. M.(er) 08:52, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
 |
Happy International Talk Like a Pirate Day! | |
|
Ahoy, me hearty! How 'bout a good ol' jug o' grog? RegARRds, Húsönd 16:56, 20 September 2007 (UTC) |
- Argh..:-D M.(er) 21:05, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
Click there to open your card! → → →
Dear Miranda,
Thank you for your participation in my RFA, which closed successfully with 83 supports, 1 oppose, and 0 neutrals. No matter if you voted (I mean, "!voted") support or oppose, I thank you for taking the time to drop by. I'm new, remember, so if you have any suggestions feel free to inform me of them, and if I do anything wrong, feel free to add to the permanent chorus of disapproval on my talk page. Special thanks to WaltonOne and Dihydrogen Monoxide for nominating me.
Credits
This design was brazenly stolen from inspired by Тhε Rαnδom Eδιτor's RFA Thanks, which in turn was inspired by Phaedriel's RFA thanks.
- That is so cute! Congrats! M.(er) 22:12, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
Hi Miranda, I just wanted to thank you for the support you showed regarding the recent unpleasant experience with impersonation I had. I know we've not really talked yet, but I most certainly have bumped into you many times, and I respect you a lot, so it was such a delight to wake up to find you had left words of encouragement, thank you so much! 
Ariel♥Gold 18:02, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
- No problem. Trolls want attention. So you just have to ignore the trolls. Have a good day. M.(er) 00:19, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
 |
The Original Barnstar | |
| Have a barnstar for your contribs - Phoenix 15 23:34, 21 September 2007 (UTC) |
You have no right to make any threats against me for violating WP:3RR when you are just as guilty. If you revert any of the "Incorporated" changes, you will be blocked as well. Please keep that in mind, and also try some civility. It will get you much further than this current attitude does. Justinm1978 04:01, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
- How interesting that you accuse me of personal attack, but when you issue a [similar warning to me], it's somehow not personal. I sense a distint lact of good faith here, and I really hope this is not the case because I respect a lot of what you contribute. That said, I think you are taking this too personal because your org is one of the ones in question here. Feel free to remove this, and we'll take it from here to the mediation page. Justinm1978 04:20, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
- Like pot, like kettle :-D. Add evidence to the mediation page, instead of disrupting to make a point further by reverting my userpage (which I can do under this), sorority pages, or you will get a block for violating 3RR. :-D M.(er) 04:28, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
- As long as you are aware of the fact that you are not innocent of what you accuse me, I'm fine :) See you on the mediation page! :) Justinm1978 04:32, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
- Imagine this, you and others work on an article, research, etc., then all of a sudden a person who doesn't know a thing about the history of the sorority and title in order to prove a point without discussing the matter on the talk page. You have done this before with other articles with the NPHC with Alpha Phi Alpha. I don't care if you contact Ccson with this matter, because he has done a majority of the work on the Alpha Phi Alpha article. He would probably agree with me, since he is in the fraternity. Because of your "all of the sudden 'I am right' revert war edits" without backing them up, which is considered original research, is irritating me. Here's a suggestion, why don't you research, add to, and improve articles, instead of making a battleground as well as personal attacks, reverting my edits on my discussion page, when I explicitly did not want them to be there. I don't have time for a debate. Please have respect for other editors who are working a hell of a lot harder to improve this site, or be blocked for disruption. M.(er) 06:52, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
- As long as you are aware of the fact that you are not innocent of what you accuse me, I'm fine :) See you on the mediation page! :) Justinm1978 04:32, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
- By the way, I am not part of any organization. Please don't associate me being a member with any NPHC organization, okay? M.(er) 07:14, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
- Like pot, like kettle :-D. Add evidence to the mediation page, instead of disrupting to make a point further by reverting my userpage (which I can do under this), sorority pages, or you will get a block for violating 3RR. :-D M.(er) 04:28, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
I've noticed in the history of pages you revert edits and identify them as vandalism a lot, even though sometimes they are just good faith. That's why you won't be an admin either, because you think you can boss other users around and say things are vandalism even when they aren't(sometimes). See here: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Melina_Perez&diff=159084390&oldid=159082790 .... you identify that as vandalism? That is good faith and even if it isn't it certainly isn't vandalism. Administrators can correctly identify vandalism, and since it would seem you can't that's why you won't be one. Wwefan980 18:22, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
By the way I'm not an admin hopeful which is why I don't care if I am one. Wwefan980 18:22, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
- First, assume good faith when bringing up a new topic on my talk page. Comments such as "you can boss other users around" and "administrators can correctly identify vandalism...and since it seem you can't" is kind of assuming bad faith about my contributions to the project. Second, in order to edit the encyclopedia, you have to follow the rules and guidelines of the project, mainly outlined in the five pillars. Second, the subject of the topic is a living person. Living persons fall into the category of biographies of living persons, which states something to the effect of libelous and poorly sourced materials should be removed. Since the IP inserted the fact, I identified it as vandalism, because the fact was unsourced at the point and IMHO, considered to be original research. The IP, then noted that the source said the fact to be true according to the source. I have read the source of the article, and the fact of her "attention" is sourced in the article. M.(er) 07:22, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
lol ok. Wwefan980 13:15, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
I offered to mediate the current case you are involved in here. I would appreciate a response. Sincerely, --Тhε Rαnδom Eδιτor 03:15, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
- I am okay with you mediating the case. However, I will no longer comment any further on the case since it is up to the organizations in question to determine whether the words "XXX Sorority/Fraternity, Incorporated" should be in the article. M.(er) 04:57, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
- I will wait for a response from the respective organizations, then I will comment on my points. M.(er) 04:59, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
- Congrats. M.(er) 16:57, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for your support in my Request for Adminship, which passed with 50 supports, 1 neutral, and 1 oppose. My goal is to keep earning your trust every time I grab the "mop". (And I'm always open to constructive criticism and advice!) Again, thanks. --Fabrictramp 17:01, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
- Congrats. M.(er) 16:59, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
Your quite welcome, I was glad to find these videos too, Unfortunately though it looks like the person who posted them on YouTube has unceremoniously removed them without even an explanation, I'll search YouTube again to see if they have been reposted or if someone else posted them. Simon Bar Sinister 09:13, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
- Yes, I watched both videos. Both were fantastic. M.(er) 17:00, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
M, i didn't know you weren't feeling well. hope you are doing better..
. -RoBoTamice 18:50, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks. M.(er) 00:02, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 39 | 24 September 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |||||||||||||
| Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST | ||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. R Delivery Bot 02:31, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Curtis Willkie, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. KenWalker | Talk 15:43, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
- Hi, instead of notifying all of the contributors of people who contribute to that page, next time, contact the person who initiated the page to notify them that the article will be deleted. Thanks. M.(er) 23:29, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
- My apologies if my notification to you was an inconvenience, however I consider it a courtesy to notify those who have edited an article as they may have an interest in it or more to contribute. --KenWalker | Talk 00:55, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
- Nah, it's not an inconvenience. I just reverted vandalism on the page. Cheers. M.(er) 05:29, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
Oh, boy! Wikipedia Weekly Episode 31 has been released!
.mp3 and .ogg versions can be found at http://wikipediaweekly.org/2007/09/26/wikipedia-weekly-31-return-of-the-panel/ and as always, you can download old episodes and more at http://wikipediaweekly.com/.
Please spread the word about Wikipedia Weekly. We're trying to spread the word so that people know about the project!
For Wikipedia Weekly — WODUP 02:40, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
If you do not wish to receive such notifications, please remove yourself from the list.
Thanks for uploading Image:Soulsista.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:20, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
- Done Guideline provided. M.(er) 07:36, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
Hi. Sorry for taking your time. You seem to be an experienced talk page ad creator. I am thinking about making ads for WikiProjects I am involved in and would like to ask you which software is best for doing this. Thanks. Tbo 157(talk) (review) 19:14, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
Hi again. Sorry to keep bothering you but I have been trying all morning to create an ad banner but GIMP is very hard to use for me as I am not an experienced graphical software user. Since you seem to be very experienced with using the programme, could you possibly create one for Wikipedia:WikiProject Engineering. If you can create one then I would like a dark blue background and the folowing images included, Image:Nuvola apps kcmsystem.svg, Image:Nuvola apps kig.png, Image:Nuvola apps kmplot.png and Image:Nuvola apps kcalc.png as suggested on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Engineering#Gaining more members. Your help will be greatly appreciated by the wikiproject as we need more members but I will understand if you can't make the ad for whatever reason. I would once again like to apologise for taking your time. Thanks. Tbo 157(talk) (review) 12:35, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
- I will make an ad with one of the images, probably with the main project image. I am quite busy, so please understand if your banner is not in a timely manner. Also, please note that I quit the project a long time ago (seen by this revelation), and gave it to PPG. Mirandargh 20:37, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
- Also, next time that you want an ad made for your project, go to the banner project, see who is available to make banners for that project. This takes a lot out of my free time, and I would appreciate if you would have taken those avenues beforehand instead of asked me to create a banner for your project at the last minute, when I am trying to take a break from Wikipedia as a whole, out of respect for me, because I am not being paid to do these banners. Mirandargh 02:47, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for your suggestions. I've responded to them and would like to see your feedback. Thanks! - Mtmelendez (Talk|UB|Home) 14:40, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
Wikiwand in your browser!
Seamless Wikipedia browsing. On steroids.
Every time you click a link to Wikipedia, Wiktionary or Wikiquote in your browser's search results, it will show the modern Wikiwand interface.
Wikiwand extension is a five stars, simple, with minimum permission required to keep your browsing private, safe and transparent.
