User talk:Fraggle81/Archive 4

This is an archive of past discussions about User:Fraggle81. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4

I actually thought my edit was rather constructive as it fleshed out the short paragraph on Fangirl/Fanboys. It also explained that many fans do not obsess over the show but instead over the actors. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.61.100.151 (talk) 13:55, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

Hello, The section that you wrote was more of your opinion than anything else and as such wasn't appropriate for the article. Original research should not be added to articles - facts should be verifiable. Fraggle81 (talk) 08:52, 20 January 2014 (UTC)

Hey I was trying to add a link about the Obama logo - did I format wrong? There's a film I saw online about it that would be a great link. I'm new sorry — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kyleluvsew (talk • contribs) 16:04, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

	The Real Life Barnstar
	“Don't cry because it's over, smile because it happened.” md rizwan akhtar 15:15, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

Thank you Fraggle81 (talk) 08:52, 20 January 2014 (UTC)

I have reverted your change. I feel no compunction in doing this, given that you did not read the diff. Please read it, then decide if you still believe it is not constructive. MatthewWilkes (talk) 11:28, 15 January 2014 (UTC)

EDIT: This has been further vandalised by ClueBot. Please keep your programmes in check. MatthewWilkes (talk) 11:30, 15 January 2014 (UTC)

Well I certainly don't quite follow all this. But I've reverted to the buttless version. :-) Dougweller (talk) 11:56, 15 January 2014 (UTC)

And considering a block. Dougweller (talk) 12:16, 15 January 2014 (UTC)

I see you have got to the ~~butt~~ bottom of this Doug :-) Fraggle81 (talk) 16:11, 15 January 2014 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) I can't find the WP:BADPUN guidelines, could you help? --Roxy the dog (resonate) 17:53, 15 January 2014 (UTC)

Ah yes I could have had a promising career as a headline writer for the Sun had I not devoted my life to chasing vandals and stalking talk pages

Fraggle81 (talk) 08:59, 20 January 2014 (UTC)

Nothing on the page was incorrect nor unverifiable.

Why does it keep getting reverted? Do I need to grab my camera and go acquire photographs as a source? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.23.1.180 (talk) 03:41, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

Some things just don't belong in an encyclopaedia Fraggle81 (talk) 09:00, 20 January 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for noticing the vandalism in the Thomas Seymour article, mostly written by me, and fixing it.Grinbriar (talk) 05:31, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

You're welcome Fraggle81 (talk) 09:01, 20 January 2014 (UTC)

I changed the Krendale Golf Course from 27 to 18 because they completed a third 9-hole course several years ago making it a 27 hole golf course. The three courses are the North, West and South course. See here - http://www.krendalegolfcourse.com/about/about.htm — Preceding unsigned comment added by Winx62 (talk • contribs) 03:11, 23 January 2014 (UTC)

Hello, thanks for providing a reference. I will make the necessary changes. Fraggle81 (talk) 03:15, 23 January 2014 (UTC)

if you cross-checked why i made the change that i made before automatically reverting it like a jack ass, you would see that his name is Michel Aoun, not Michael Aoun, and that is in fact the way it is spelled in the wikipedia article about him. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.150.155.24 (talk) 02:38, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

One of us is braying on.. who does that make the ass? Fraggle81 (talk) 08:25, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

When a single author creates a page, and then blanks it, as in the case of Stefan Wesley, we can consider that a legitimate request for page deletion, and rather than reverting that action, we should tag the page with {{db-author}}. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 14:54, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

That particular user has since removed the template. Besides which the page was also contributed to by an IP editor which I have no way of knowing the identity of. No request for deletion has been made that I'm aware of. The current situation is we're currently left with a broken page with no legible content. Fraggle81 (talk) 14:58, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

Posting info about the one's twitter profile is not bad thing. Please rollback my changes in the wiki page (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Omar_Abdullah). I think people of India, rather whole world should be familiar with his twitter profile and let the world came to know about it. It will be good.

Please I request you to roll back my changes about ex chief minister of Karnataka Mr. N. Dharam Singh - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/N._Dharam_Singh. He is a low - caste Rajput leader, (basically known as JAINDE, in South India / GURJAR). He along with Mrs. Sonia Gandhi where the people who had troubled Wikipedia founder Assanage around 2008 - 2009, which made him to come out with wikileaks. This info is very much needed for a revolution in India. There needs to be awareness in India about b***ch Soni Gandhi. And, please tell Mr. Assanage to contact me personally at admin@netizensstop.com. I have many more things to discuss with him. Many more things for his wikileaks site like this -- http://shailendrasblog.in/post/74728753002/few-unsolved-mysteries-under-congress-rule .

Whoah, since when did Julian Assange found Wikipedia?? I'm sure Jimbo might have something to say about that one. This is Wikipedia not Wikileaks - the former is an online encyclopaedia founded by Jimmy Wales the latter is a website for whistleblowers founded by Julian assange. There is no link other than both have the word wiki in their title. Fraggle81 (talk) 11:22, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

I'll try to make this short as I know our time here is only being wasted further. I would like to make it clear that it wasn't my decision to censor the word, I just neatened it by obscuring the 'n' as well as the 'u'. It was a surprise to see your notification as I've never received one before and had it not been sent, my attention wouldn't have been drawn to your reversal of such a trivial issue and this matter would have avoided itself. To put it frankly I don't know why you went through the effort of contacting me. I don't like censorship any more than most people but it doesn't really bother me. For future reference I appreciate you were trying to be polite and I don't mind what you do to one word edits but please leave me out of it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.146.149.185 (talk) 18:04, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

Gave him a 3RR warning but haven't reverted him yet. Will later if no one else does. I've reverted almost all his other edits. ~off to dinner now Dougweller (talk) 18:18, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

Hi, my revision to the page on Murphy's law, stating Gabriel's law: "that which can go right will go right" is to provide a juxtaposition against the possible cynical and pessimistic connotations of Murphy's law "that which can go wrong will go wrong". While Murphy's law is legitimate from a scientific and engineering perspective, an opposite should be established in order to balance robotic intelligence with human optimism. 24.84.5.56 (talk) 11:07, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

Even the official airport website title is sepingganairport.com . Tell my why you say my revision is not constructive? Do i have to send you the pictures airport name's front sign? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sepinggan (talk • contribs) 14:00, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

It has clearly undergone a rename. The references given support this. Fraggle81 (talk) 14:04, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

Hi, I have made a request to save the edit on Boodles_Company talk page. Can you now have a look and save it if you dont see any issues or let me know what is causing the conflict of interest.ILNnewmedia (talk) 15:42, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

I'm sorry I vandalized the page for Gatiss, I was just really bored... :P I'll just correct grammar mistakes from now on — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thdbrill (talk • contribs) 03:21, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia is a Temple for the mind. I apologize for vandalizing the page about the football player Kemokai Kallon from Sierra Leone I will refrain from making vandalism on articles in the Future. I was simply experimenting with articles to try and figure out how to use. After all that is what talk pages are for. TheMetaphorer (talk) 07:05, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

To the person Fraggle81 Subject The Last of the Classical Economist, you cannot really defend something you never studied. On what grounds did ou erase my touch up of the Dismal Science's John Cairnes? I was merely stating the thought of John Cairnes with a quote. DeanSwift p.s I forgot to verify my account I am waiting on a email to verify the account. By the way I am writing a book on economic history. I have 55 plus books under my dealt that enjoyed to reading, and 7 more that I reviewed and exposed their flaws. Those books were not enjoyed I just had to read them. You can do as you wish. But you might want to read the book I referenced, and back Cairnes claim that man should not have hope and be optimistic, and were he do to so, he would become too much of a menace. Otherwise it is best to keep man pessimistic. Fraggle81 do you know who DeanSwift was? Giving commentary on something you know nothing about is not honoring innocent until proven guilty. from yours truly Dean Swift. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DeanByles (talk • contribs) 10:47, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

You make a lot of assumptions, articles are not for your personal commentary or assessment. If you wouldn't read it in an encyclopaedia made from dead trees then you shouldn't read it in one formed of bits and bytes. Also your edit was marked as minor and certainly wasn't. Fraggle81 (talk) 12:02, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

first of all i didn't edit anything about scott raynor. it must have been someone else from my computer i will make sure that i monitor what people are doing under my ip address but i read what was said that you edited and removed and my question to you would then be how do you know that he didn't enjoy giving oral sex to men?

How do you know that he did? Fraggle81 (talk) 12:02, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

Hi, I disagree with the link removal you have recently done. The website I've added does deliver value and is relevant.Chris33smit (talk) 15:26, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

See WP:EL Fraggle81 (talk) 15:27, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

I suggest you review your edits; Do not add your name to changes you make to pages. I would also point you to WP:DTR Fraggle81 (talk) 15:51, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

		The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		Hey there, vandal fighter. I noticed your hard work on helping to keep Wikipedia clean and wanted to give you this barnstar. Just flash it around and most vandals will flee in terror at the sight of it. So you only need to concentrate on the more dangerous ones. K6ka (talk \| contribs) 17:56, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

How do you link and cite articles? Also, how do you link to different sections on your profile? (Such as your talk page, your sandbox, your main page etc) TheMetaphorer (talk) 05:07, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

	The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
	There's no STiki award for 200 000, so this might have to do. Good work, keep it up! Widr (talk) 05:45, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

Thanks Widr, you too! Fraggle81 (talk) 14:11, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

Talk:Sonny_Barger clearly states that Sonny Barger has been married four times . I wrote that Sonny_Barger has married a woman on more than one occasion . It's constructive to re-arrange , edit or expand on what I wrote ; however, entirely omitting this information seems to degrade the quality of the article by reducing the amount of information it contains while not offering any apparent advantage . Please try to help build the info in the wikis instead of reducing it . Perhaps you can join me and add in some of the references to these facts about Sonny Barger's wives to make the article more complete . MalcolmX86 (talk) 06:45, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

Yes he's married a woman on more than one occasion but that really doesn't tell us much about anything. If you had written more than "Sonny Barger has married a woman on more than one occasion ." it may have been worth keeping in the article. Fraggle81 (talk) 14:07, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

Perhaps you or someone else can join me by adding in some of these facts about Sonny Barger's relationships to make the article more complete . If you had left the page the way it was , people would at least read and understand that he had been married more than once . Omitting information entirely tells people nothing . Anyone can add more information to the page using about as much effort as we have expended here on your talk page . So let's get it on .

(P.S. I couldn't figure out the colon reply here , so I messed the formatting up on your reply.)  MalcolmX86 (talk) 00:06, 6 February 2014 (UTC)

Please note that there is a discussion on proper captioning with respect to variations of English. Feel free to give constructive comments. Cheers. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 143.65.196.20 (talk) 17:37, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

Hi, I edited Boodles Jewellery page now and deleted words like leading etc. Hope its ok now?194.12.5.20 (talk) 16:11, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

Hi, I edited the Grey Poupon page. It already listed two actors, but erroneously listed John Cleese. It was clear to me watching the clip that this was a younger and shorter man, albeit with a similar voice, and my research proved it was not. Thank you. 99.22.222.12 (talk) 02:11, 18 February 2014 (UTC)

Actually, the Cluebot reversal at Mike Delph was a false positive. I double checked the series of edits, and User:Mikedelph was merely correcting vandalism to his page, which falls under an allowed type of edit in the Wikipedia policy concerning a conflicts of interest (WP:COI). As a "human" editor, I fixed this fact/vandalism.Crtew (talk) 03:39, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Not sure what this had to do with me since Cluebot edited the page quite a while after I did. My revert was this edit. There's nothing to say this editor actually is Mike Delph so unless he identifies himself formally to the to the people at Wiki HQ its safe to say its not him and is someone up to mischief. Thanks Fraggle81 (talk) 10:29, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

You're absolutely right. I've never been good at this anti-vandalism stuff. Another suspicious user with a Mike Delph in the name made another questionable entry, which I undid. It may be from the same person as they were both mobile tags. But then again I'm not sure of anything and it's way out of my expertise and area of interest. Crtew (talk) 18:50, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

The problem continues at Mike Delph with a person who has a pattern of vandalism on a BLP page. Do you know what to do in these cases? Crtew (talk) 05:01, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

I have that page saved in my watchlist so am keeping an eye on the situation now. Users who are committing vandalism should be warned and if they have been sufficiently warned - generally after a level 4 warning they can be reported to WP:AIV for blocking. Requesting page protection from an admin is also an option if there has been recent persistent vandalism. You might be interested in the Counter Vandalism Unit Academy if you would like to brush up on your anti vandal skills. Thanks Fraggle81 (talk) 02:04, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Youve been reported for violating 3R and other rules. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:30A:C07A:25C0:F108:EB21:FE91:28C7 (talk) 05:57, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

Thats nice now stop with the disruptive editing Fraggle81 (talk) 11:05, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

Why were my edits removed? Both were facts35.13.252.59 (talk) 02:41, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

They violate WP:BLP Thanks Fraggle81 (talk) 14:12, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

All I did was update a year. The page had an incorrect release year for a link to an upcoming film. Why would you feel it necessary to undo an edit that consisted of me CORRECTING inaccurate information? Cisrael125 (talk) 04:40, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

Hello, you left no edit summary or reference for your change so how are other editors supposed to know that your edits are legitimate? Fraggle81 (talk) 14:09, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

Several discussions have already been started on the talk page regarding the Liliane Bettencourt scam emails. Please discontinue reverting information about the scam emails without discussing on the talk page. Thank you. --173.59.201.71 (talk) 13:43, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

Except there's not a great deal to discuss here. You are the only person in both those discussions. You really need to see WP:NOT. WP:IAR says "If the rules prevent you from improving or maintaining Wikipedia, ignore them.". I Don't see that your edit were either improving or maintaining Wikipedia. I will revert it again since my changes aren't controversial where yours are. Thanks Fraggle81 (talk) 13:55, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.59.201.71 (talk) 16:47, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

I appreciate what you were doing and why but this really wasn't the place for it. Sometimes the rules don't work how you would think they would. All the best. Fraggle81 (talk) 01:51, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

Fraggle, I am not surprised that you removed my comment, because it pointed out the need for a revision of the movie's plot summary, which is largely inaccurate, but did not provide a substitute summary. However, the problem with the summary still remains, and it should be the responsibility of the writer who provided the plot summary to correct it. -- Boud355 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Boud355 (talk • contribs) 20:20, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

Hello Boud, a message on the article's talk page would have been the way to go with this. It's not any one users responsibility to do anything, if you feel there are changes to be made then feel free to make them. Could I also point out that you probably shouldn't have marked most of your edits as minor; its quite likely someone will give you a warning for it if its noticed. Have a look at WP:MINOR for some guidance on when to mark as minor. Happy editing! Fraggle81 (talk) 01:42, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

read: http://www.firstpost.com/topic/person/kate-beckinsale-actress-kate-beckinsale-accepts-the-jeanclaude-ga-image-0dtZdLd1d21sC-3379-1.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.222.202.98 (talk) 22:37, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

Hello. The modify to the SandS page were correct. Unfortunately I'm new in Wikipedia and I was trying to understand how to add Figures. All the pictures I want to add are not under copyright but I cannot add the to the Common. Thanks Matusa 166 — Preceding undated comment added 09:18, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

Hi Fraggle81, you may see I reverted/undone your edit on this page- it was collateral to returning the page to a redirect. Boodles or those associated with them keep editing their artciles. Thanks for your time and understanding. Murry1975 (talk) 22:34, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

No problem, thanks! Fraggle81 (talk) 21:38, 4 March 2014 (UTC)

What gives? 71.236.253.188 (talk) 00:44, 28 February 2014 (UTC)

Hopefully not the rope? Fraggle81 (talk) 21:38, 4 March 2014 (UTC)

That's not helpful. You know what I mean. 71.236.253.188 (talk) 01:19, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

Had to prove a point to my friend about the efficiency and reliability of Wikipedia. Thanks for the edit, only took a minute! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.254.165.178 (talk) 14:54, 4 March 2014 (UTC)

Please don't this is still vandalism and if it hadn't been caught would of been detrimental to the encyclopaedia Fraggle81 (talk) 21:38, 4 March 2014 (UTC)

Hi, in response to your edit, We are in a Communications class at North Carolina State University where we are required to create or add to an existing Wiki page. Please do not edit anything more until you see the finish product. Your patience is much appreciated.Wikilaina (talk) 21:29, 4 March 2014 (UTC)

See the message on your talk page - that's not how things work here. Fraggle81 (talk) 21:38, 4 March 2014 (UTC)

I believe my edit is constructive with the context of the show. It was stated on an episode that they do not have a wikipedia page, and so I thought it would be a nice easter egg on the page. Im not trying to vandalize, and I even gave a description on the edit. If I had known the exact episode I would have sited it, but I do know it was hosted in a horse corral. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.26.67.24 (talk) 01:13, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

Hello. I think you misinterpreted my edit. When I said not to remove that link, it is because some vandals keep removing the link from the wiki page. It's getting very annoying and they wouldn't listen to any comments on the talk page or anything. I wanted to stop them from removing links from the article. Thank you for your time, --Joeyjoejoeman (talk) 02:20, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

Fraggle81 left a message on your talk page in "March 2014". Hello, I'm Fraggle81. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Fuchsia (band) because it did not appear constructive...

Hi, I am new user so hope I haven't disgraced myself! I feel certain that given the interest and acknowledgement of my band Fuchsia in recent years, commonly acknowledged as a pioneer in the Psych/Folk genre, a review in Record Collector ( a well regarded music publication) of the recent album is appropriate, which I would use to assist my 'case' in including Fuchsia into the Wikipaedia list of Psych Folk bands, as well as in the list of significant contributors to the genre. Thanks Tony D — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tonydurantfuchsia (talk • contribs) 02:12, 6 March 2014 (UTC)

My edit was reverted back to its old state. I changed it because the page was heavily bias in a manner thats not in the best interest of the people. It is supposed to be discussing a controversy giving both sides of the issue while obviously favouring the scandal rather than the facts and supporting it with lies misdirection in a manner to manipulate public opinion using psychology. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Maw368 (talk • contribs) 09:00, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

Please use the talk page before making large changes such as the ones you have. Fraggle81 (talk) 15:22, 6 March 2014 (UTC)

I need to explain to you why the edit was made.

In light of the sources provided and already being used one was being source abused. The quote within the paper clearly detailed how the Cishan Peiligang complex had no obvious linguistic descendants yet a change was made concerning the original article using that source for the section concerning DNA. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Emmohhaach (talk • contribs) 15:08, 6 March 2014 (UTC)

Please take a look at the WOAY-TV page again. We're dealing with minor vandalism. A reporter was recently fired and he can't seem to accept that he no longer works for the station. Thanks. 204.111.186.71 (talk) 05:04, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

Hello, this is difficult since I cannot verify this either way. Do you have a reference for the reporter leaving? thanks Fraggle81 (talk) 22:55, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

It appears the situation may have resolved itself. If not, I will be back with some kind of proof. 204.111.186.71 (talk) 04:37, 8 March 2014 (UTC)

Hi,

 Please could you explain why you reverted my edit?
 Did I do it wrong?  It's a term widely known and used, and dates back easily over a hundred years (there's print and photo evidence of the term in use over 100yo).
 The town itself is even known as Monkey Town.
 Not sure what the problem was - although this is my first edit, so it's possible I got something wrong!

Bigreddragon (talk) 16:58, 6 March 2014 (UTC)

Hi, your edits will require a reliable reference to back them up in that case, thanks Fraggle81 (talk) 22:55, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

There may or may not be personal reminiscences in DOS/360 and successors, but neither the heading ==DOS== nor the subsection on DOS/360 was a personal reminiscence. Please discuss this in Talk:DOS/360 and successors#, or delete only whatever personal reminiscences may be in the article. Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz Username:Chatul (talk) 22:34, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

I have no personal interest in the subject. The edits were reverted for the personal commentary you left on the article. Thanks Fraggle81 (talk) 22:55, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for your input!

Hello, Fraggle81. You have new messages at Naiad013's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Just wanted to let you know that wasn't me who left the edit on that Beatles album — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.127.65.172 (talk) 00:53, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

Hi, you probably have a shared IP address, just ignore warnings that aren't for you. Thanks Fraggle81 (talk) 01:44, 12 March 2014 (UTC)

Fedogan and Bremer-- I am, myself, pretty much the entire business in question, nowadays. I've reorganized it since Mr Rahman's death. I thought updated information was warranted, but will go look at your reversion to see what it is that 97.121.18.106 (talk) 01:54, 11 March 2014 (UTC)I changed, which you've found objectionable or erroneous. I have no claim to understanding how this whole wiki thing works, nor to understand HTML, etc--- but I do have more current information. fedogan@millenicom.com 97.121.18.106 (talk) 01:54, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

Regarding Fedogan & Bremer reversion: Clearly, I'm not a real wiki guy, don't know any html etc.--sorry 'bout that.

But the changes I made regarding F&B (which you reverted) are factual. I should know, as for all practical purposes, I AM F&B these days. Fedogan and Bremer certainly DID release WEIRDER SHADOWS OVER INNSMOUTH ISBN-13 978187825213 in November 2012, for example. I know this because I've shipped around 400 of that print run out to buyers. Similarly, unless Lovecraft eZine has defaulted on our agreement, our recording of "Fungi From Yuggoth" is no longer being plagiarized through their site. And we ARE, in fact, preparing a re-release. And so on.

You might check these statements at fedoganandbremer.com, or the facebook page, or drop an email to Mike Davis at Lovecraft eZine. Or you could look at Bowker's books in print, or even Baker & Taylor book distributors.

Accordingly, I am confused about your reversion to make this wiki outdated in factual terms. I am not trying to make trouble. I don't think my entries venture into advertising, slander, or etc. Just confused.97.121.18.106 (talk) 02:15, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

Please advise. Dennis Weiler/FEDOGAN@millenicom.com97.121.18.106 (talk) 02:15, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

RE: Fedogan and Bremer-- typo in that ISBN, sorry-- it is ISBN 9791878252074 Parameter error in {{ISBN}}: checksum for WEIRDER SHADOWS OVER INNSMOUTH. D.E.Weiler97.121.18.106 (talk) 02:41, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

Sorry about that, an error on my part. Thanks for bringing it to my attention. Fraggle81 (talk) 01:22, 12 March 2014 (UTC)

I corrected the cuba page with language I saw as more truthful. Spanish "explorers" did not "discover" anything. They conquered, raped, and murdered the indigenous. They stole their land and colonized the people they enslaved. As a cuban person, I find these depictions to be untruthful and offensive. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.40.29.8 (talk) 17:56, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

We had a similar thing going on with a hoarde of Vikings not so long back. In all seriousness though Columbus is known for exploring and discovering, what he did when he discovered/conquered somewhere is secondary to that. Fraggle81 (talk) 01:44, 12 March 2014 (UTC)

Why did you revert my edit. this person was the pilot. This tragedy is not well known. I was trying to put names to a tragedy, what do you need? Maybe this? http://www3.gendisasters.com/air-disasters/12628/100-mile-house-bc-plane-explosion-july-1965 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Balfourstreet (talk • contribs) 20:26, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

Hello, thanks for providing a reference. If you want to add the information back in could you please leave an edit summary where possible to let other editors know what changes you have made. Thanks again Fraggle81 (talk) 01:44, 12 March 2014 (UTC)

Any reason why you are reverting valid wikilinks, such as at Ferryhill? Giant Snowman 10:40, 12 March 2014 (UTC)

Ah, thanks for catching that. A case of big fingers on a small screen and Wikipedia not playing nice with my phone browser. Fraggle81 (talk) 12:10, 12 March 2014 (UTC)

Hi Fraggle81, You deleted my edit to the White Beeches Golf and Country Club page. I am a board member at White Beeches. The board of directors at White Beeches have instructed me to make these edits. What is your interest in White Beeches? Please leave my White Beeches edits alone.

Thank You! Jarl — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jarl Jensen (talk • contribs) 15:01, 12 March 2014 (UTC)

Hello, Wikipedia is not an advertising medium. I have no interest in the article itself, only the edits you made. You should also read WP:COI before making further edits. Thanks Fraggle81 (talk) 16:18, 12 March 2014 (UTC)

I thought it was clever but it wasn't relevant, sorry — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.227.123.254 (talk) 20:57, 12 March 2014 (UTC)

Was something Wrong with my statement? https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Davis_Applied_Technology_College&diff=599587599&oldid=579190971

Hello, the person named doesn't appear notable. Notability usually requires the subject having their own article. Thanks Fraggle81 (talk) 15:04, 15 March 2014 (UTC)

The edits were not an attempt at vandalism, although the very first was a mistake as I wanted preview before save. The bands i was starting to list played at both Emo's locations many times. It just seemed like all the bands listed were newer and the 90's saw many great bands on those stages. That's all. Regards CFI```` — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chrisfromiowa (talk • contribs) 17:19, 14 March 2014 (UTC)

Hello, the bands you had neither had a reference or their own Wikipedia page and so aren't verifiable. Addition of either would be helpful. Thanks Fraggle81 (talk) 15:08, 15 March 2014 (UTC)

You changed my edits on John Swofford but I don't know why. They were very constructive. They identified his hatred for Clemson which he has openly expressed. If you watched the Duke-Clemson basketball game last night you will very clearly see what I am talking about. Maybe I could have left off the name calling but I really don't like him. He is a douchebag. Just watch the games I referred on there or last night's game. You'll understand. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 162.229.28.111 (talk) 14:00, 15 March 2014 (UTC)

Not sure this needs a reply, I think your comments speak for themselves. Fraggle81 (talk) 15:09, 15 March 2014 (UTC)

I'm afraid that the Company has requested I contact you directly regarding the seditious material posted on your personal blog.

Please email me on my academic address - eb47@st-andrews.ac.uk and it would be the Company's pleasure to liaise with you further on this matter.

With all best wishes,

Tedward Rattle Sandcorp., Inc. 80.42.10.0 (talk) 23:55, 16 March 2014 (UTC)

Do students have nothing better to do after the union has closed for the night? Fraggle81 (talk) 23:58, 16 March 2014 (UTC)

Hi Fraggle81, I am on the board of White Beeches country club. You have deleted my changes. I have been instructed by the board of Governors of White Beeches Golf and Country Club to make these changes. Please allow these changes to be made. Thanks, Jarl — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jarl Jensen (talk • contribs) 13:38, 17 March 2014 (UTC)

As I said in the message above "Wikipedia is not an advertising medium. I have no interest in the article itself, only the edits you made. You should also read WP:COI before making further edits." The board of governors for the White Beeches Golf and Country Club don't have any more say here than anyone else, probably less so since there are rules on conflict of interest. I have once again reverted your changes since the tone and content are more appropriate for a brochure than an encyclopaedia. I also note that you marked your edit as minor, it clearly isn't when such a large section of text has been added. Fraggle81 (talk) 13:53, 17 March 2014 (UTC)

I made a addition to Winnetka page, adding former resident Ann-Margaret. Please go look at her page, that's where she went to HS. I realize that I made an error in the entering, putting it in the wrong place, but you deleted it while I was trying to correct it. Guess I am done with Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.90.15.218 (talk) 15:47, 17 March 2014 (UTC)

Hello, every editor here has been where you are and we all get things deleted. Rather than throwing your hands up and being defeated take a little time to recompose yourself and start again. If you need help you can either ask an experienced editor (most will be glad to help), or try the Teahouse for any questions you have or help you need. I will leave a welcome on your talk page also. Thanks Fraggle81 (talk) 16:01, 17 March 2014 (UTC)

sir please give me a chance,i see this wikipedia writing articles jst a few days back,today i start my work,so pleased to give me some time,this article will help those students or peoples who get detained while thier studies,or it will give them some more energy im sure sir,please understood sir — Preceding unsigned comment added by Afeef Rehman TV (talk • contribs) 16:36, 17 March 2014 (UTC)

Can you help me to understand this revert and this warning? -- Mufka ^(u) ^(t) ^(c) 17:15, 17 March 2014 (UTC)

Hello Mufka, yes these are whats colloquially known as a cock up. I'll sort it, thanks for letting me know. Fraggle81 (talk) 17:30, 17 March 2014 (UTC)

Sorry about the bad edit to Fitzpatrick, I was just having a little fun. Thanks to you I've made an account and I'm now editing away! MiniSlash 87 (talk) 17:22, 17 March 2014 (UTC)

Good to hear, happy editing! Fraggle81 (talk) 17:30, 17 March 2014 (UTC)

Hello,

I have read with great interest your page about why you revert. Everything sounds reasonable and my edit does not fall foul of any of the rules - except that I included a single non-self-serving external link that I can easily remove. I realize that "you have no interest in the subject" but I am sure you have great interest in whether or not Wikipedia misstates, or worse, contradicts itself. Please read carefully the current text of the article which I have attempted to improve by introducing authentic references to linguistic, historical, and literary sources. For example, the current article first says "Paracha comes from the name Feracha" without citing any evidence of who says that and why. Then it contradicts itself by saying "This term came from Parcha." Again without any evidence. Further on, it claims "They are wealthy Muslim traders" and "This wealthy class" which is an utter misstatement because millions of Parachas in the sub-continent are desperately destitute and some are Buddhists, Hindu, and atheists. Please also note how poorly written it is - almost no sentence here is grammatically correct.

Parachas are not a religious group, they are an ethnic group with a strong linguistic identity. However, since a majority of them are Muslim, they are extremely averse to any research that shows them as being originally Buddhist or non-Muslim. This Wikipedia article throughout its history has suffered because of this. An almost fanatic wish to have for themselves an exalted Muslim past (and a wealthy one) and to deny a non-Muslim origin is at that the foundation of this article. Paracha promote the myth that they are descended from the Farasha - people who used to spread the carpet for Mohammad - in spite of overwhelming evidence that no such linguistic transformation of Paracha to Farasha is possible. My edit provides that evidence without prejudice. Please read again, reconsider, and let me know what else I need to get these edits through (other than removing the single external link). You will have to spend some time on this, but it will be worth it for the Wikipedia cause.

Many thanks for your time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Awebuser (talk • contribs) 18:37, 17 March 2014 (UTC)

Let's get funky

CCK 22 (talk) 14:35, 18 March 2014 (UTC)

213.215.44.122 (talk) 15:08, 18 March 2014 (UTC)

I understand that you deleted one of my comments on the wikipedia page of A.K.C Natrajan. While I agree that the second sentence was irreverent to A.K.C Natrajan, He actually is my great-grandfather. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.80.185.40 (talk) 21:45, 18 March 2014 (UTC)

Hello, with the greatest of respect how are you notable? Do you meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines? If so then that is fine, if not then you really should not add your name and irrelevant comments to articles. Thanks Fraggle81 (talk) 02:04, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

I don't believe the revision I made on Xbox Live Indie Games could be considered vandalism. I was fixing the title of a game linked to correspond with the name given in the article of the game. For reference: I Made a Game with Zombies in It! I would appreciate you undoing your revert and allowing my revision to stay.

thank ~Da Nerd ▪ Contributions ▪ Talk 03:28, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

Hello, thanks for letting me know and clarifying things. I will make the necessary changes, Thanks! Fraggle81 (talk) 03:36, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

Fraggle81 i talked with another admin about my changes to the pyrenees page , he stated it would be ok , can i ask why this was removed? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kampbyll (talk • contribs) 03:53, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

You reverted my edit on the Blitzgiving page because you claimed it was "not constructive." I disagree. I changed "turkey" to "turturkeykey" because that is what the character calls the turkey-within-a-turkey that is being referenced. If you object to the term "turturkeykey" being used more than once in the article, then as an alternative, it would make more sense to call it a turkey (no quotes), rather than a "turkey" (with quotes), which implies that it is not actually a turkey but just being called a "turkey." If you don't want me to fix it in either of those two ways, please explain your specific objection to my proposed fix. Thanks! -Claudiaalismaki

Hi! I was just trying to update my Wikipedia page with current and more reliable info. (I'm assuming one of my High School buddies wrote the one you rolled back to.) Could you please revert back to my corrections dated 3/18/14? Thanks! Droomz (talk) 18:21, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

Hello, the information you left gave no proper references whereas the information that you removed did. Unfortunately its one of the quirks of Wikipedia that you can have any information you want no matter how incorrect as long as it is supported by the correct references. If you can give references that meet the criterea at WP:CITE that would be great. Fraggle81 (talk) 15:29, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

I'm not sure my edit to Keisuke (puzzle) should have been reverted. The edit I made was entirely factual and fits in with the article. Edderiofer (talk) 19:02, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

Uralguyuralguyuralguy (talk) 23:51, 19 March 2014 (UTC)Hi Fraggle81, I would like to contribute to this section on "Sticky-shed syndrome", I have been dealing with this for years, I handled tape restoration for Ascentmedia (Deluxe) in Burbank Ca., and now work for USC School of Cinematic Arts. Is there a specific spot I should add my contribution? Thank you Bill HendersonUralguyuralguyuralguy (talk) 23:51, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

Hello Bill, I appreciate the effort you went to to add information however there are several problems with it. Firstly It would appear to be original research. Secondly, the tone of the text is not encyclopaedic and thirdly you have added your name as a credit to the article, the only place you should leave your name is on a talk page or in your user space thanks. Fraggle81 (talk) 15:48, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

Sir I edited the plaid Cymru candidates name because it was not Syd Morgan who stood those years in this constituency, I was the candidate for plaid Cymru. Stephen Morgan. I merely wished to correct a mistake and did not wish to become a vandal or even an editor. Apologies if I have not stuck to protocols. (81.106.50.224 (talk) 03:46, 20 March 2014 (UTC))

Hello, Thanks for the message wold it be possible for you to give a reference for the change? Thanks Fraggle81 (talk) 15:43, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

I WAS AWARDED 25% OF THIS SONG. MY NAME SHOULD BE INCLUDED WITH WRITERS.

BOBBY MARIN

 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.5.36.84 (talk) 13:32, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

Hello Bobby, Please don't leave your telephone number and personal details openly available online since you will undoubted get harassed by lowlifes. To reply to your query do you have a reference for what you would like adding per WP:CITE. Thanks Fraggle81 (talk) 15:53, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

Why don't you ask another Hebrew scholar how the Hebrew word נֱרד is voweled and pronounced? I was Professor of Hebrew Studies at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee for 30 years. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.28.209.207 (talk) 22:08, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

To be fair you could be anyone, how is anyone here supposed to know? You left no edit summary and changed a word in a referenced section from nard to nerd, that's a change that's going to get reverted. Fraggle81 (talk) 22:35, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

I was just updating the Starz TV page with a new logo as it recently changed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Impendingdoom123 (talk • contribs) 22:51, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for the explanation Fraggle81 (talk) 15:52, 22 March 2014 (UTC)

It was completely related to the subject it contained the images and information about the haiku stairs i thought it was valid.So, i ask you why you undid my change please explain! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Krunall007 (talk • contribs) 15:48, 22 March 2014 (UTC)

Did you actually preview your changes before pressing save? Your edits broke formatting on the page. Thanks Fraggle81 (talk) 15:52, 22 March 2014 (UTC)

I had made an edit to the planking(fad) page with a new variation (petermichaeling) you had deleted it saying it was "constructive" yet I have an Instagram page dedicated to this. Please explain the deletion further. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Robbc65 (talk • contribs) 17:00, 22 March 2014 (UTC)

If I had put it under "variations" (solely) and not under "football related" would it be able to stay up? If not how do I get it to stay? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Robbc65 (talk • contribs) 17:03, 22 March 2014 (UTC)

When you can provide some proper references for this then the edit might stand see WP:CITE. Also do not mark such edits as minor - it wasn't see WP:MINOR. Fraggle81 (talk) 17:07, 22 March 2014 (UTC)

hey, with all due respect, the point i made on the article was totally genuine. i can show you how. :D — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.179.83.17 (talk) 18:17, 22 March 2014 (UTC)

Good faith or not you can't change "No it's not!" to an article and expect it to stay unreverted. Fraggle81 (talk) 18:21, 22 March 2014 (UTC)

Just Had to prove to my son that Wikipedia is a poor reference and anybody can change things.And that it should be not used for resource for school projects! May God Bless and Truth Prevail in the name of Jesus Christ, mans only saviour! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.124.230.182 (talk) 18:22, 22 March 2014 (UTC)

Why shouldn't it? so long as a valid reference is given. Your edits were vandalism and I cant see how that is an appropriate thing to be teaching a child. Fraggle81 (talk) 18:28, 22 March 2014 (UTC)

HEY , I JUST WANT TO TELL YOU THAT PLEASE DONT EDIT THE ASWAL PAGE. IT IS MY FAMILY AND I KNOW ABOUT HISTORY OF MY FAMILY WHICH I HAVE LISTENED MANY TIME FROM ELDERS IN MY FAMILY . ASWAL ARE RAJPUT AND KHATEEK ASWAL IS OTHER CASTE.SO PLEASE DONT EDIT MY PAGE.

Sorry to see your CapsLock key is broken. Its not your page or anyone elses. The content you are leaving is not appropriate since it is Original research and completely unreferenced. Fraggle81 (talk) 18:57, 22 March 2014 (UTC)

if i am editing page which is about my caste. so what's your problem. i want reason that why are you doing this . please give reason. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Milansinghaswal (talk • contribs) 19:22, 22 March 2014 (UTC)

As above. You are about to be blocked anyway since you are edit warring and are well over 3 reverts in 24 hours. I reverted your edits as good faith however I clearly should have given you warnings. Fraggle81 (talk) 19:25, 22 March 2014 (UTC)

that was corect info about aswal page which is on many pages and every person in uttrakhand know about it only you are illiterate who have not studied about it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Milansinghaswal (talk • contribs) 19:31, 22 March 2014 (UTC)

Ok my friend, if you say so. Fraggle81 (talk) 19:36, 22 March 2014 (UTC)

sorry im new at this didn't know how to fix it thank u

No worries, have left you some helpful links on your talk page. Keep at it you will get the hang of things! Fraggle81 (talk) 19:59, 22 March 2014 (UTC)

Hey Fraggle- just wondering why my change 'meh', which reflects the meaning of the word 'drink' was removed from the page? In the sentence below, the words cupbearer was defined as 'saaqi', which is urdu/persian for cupbearer. I added the word 'meh' because its a predominant theme in most of Aziz Mian's work. Thanks, Nabeel — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nabeeljafri246 (talk • contribs) 19:57, 22 March 2014 (UTC)

Hey, sorry about that it has a different meaning in English, Thanks for the message. Fraggle81 (talk) 20:40, 22 March 2014 (UTC)

Hi

I'm Alex, an italian dj. I have a big problem with BETANIGHTCLUB of Denver. I wonder why newspapers and magazines write about a club that steals money? I explain the story. I was contacted by Mr Andrew Brad Roulier and Mrs Jill Smith (managers of BetaNightClub). They made an offer to play 3nights in their club. I accepted and we signed the contract. I sent them the money to pay the flight tickets (€ 1600,00). They would have to refund my money when I arrive to Denver. They sent me the reservation but the day after Andrew sent me the message with text:"we have problems, no party, sorry". They cancel me from Skype and others social. THey don't answer to my calls. Actually They cancelled my hotel and flight reservation. I lost my money, i don't know why a person with a good club steals money. What are €2000 for BetaNightClub? I don't know why newspapers and others important magazines can write about thief? Please, help me. What can I do? I can send you all documents. I hope you can answer me. Thank you in advance

Sorry to hear of your difficulties, perhaps a lawyer would be appropriate? Unfortunately posting content such as you did is not appropriate here. All the best Fraggle81 (talk) 20:33, 22 March 2014 (UTC)

hi there I just wondered why it was deleted? I think its important for people to know that there is help out there when it comes to HMP Birmingham's excessive call charges or even still it may be interesting to some people that the prison forces prisoners to pay so much when you consider family contact is proven to be a key part in rehabilitation,

Many thanks

Claire — Preceding unsigned comment added by Prison Phone (talk • contribs) 20:53, 22 March 2014 (UTC)

Hello Claire, your posts are considered advertising and aren't suitable content for an encyclopaedia. Have a look at WP:SOAP for more information. Thanks Fraggle81 (talk) 20:57, 22 March 2014 (UTC)

I entered a high achievers name in the high achievers list. ..I6s that wrong? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sarvamgoel (talk • contribs) 21:43, 22 March 2014 (UTC)

The person you added doesn't appear to be notable. They should at least have their own Wikipedia page. Thanks Fraggle81 (talk) 21:47, 22 March 2014 (UTC)

Hi Fraggle81, I received your message and accept your comments.

Apologies, and thanks for doing what you did. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Leekarchitect (talk • contribs) 22:29, 22 March 2014 (UTC)

The Tireless Contributor Barnstar

Congratulations on reaching the 250,000 classification threshold using WP:STiki! We haven't yet drawn up a "triple-diamond-plantium-kryptonium" milestone barnstar, but as the first to get there (and only one to get there for a while, besides Widr) it seems fair you should get to pick out how we decorate it. I thank you for all your contributions to my tool and Wikipedia at large. I'll soon be authoring an academic paper about human factors in anti-vandalism, and I'll see if I can get you a nice mention in there. West.andrew.g (talk) 15:04, 23 March 2014 (UTC)

Wow, thanks Andrew that's great, thank you. What do I need to do for the barnstar decoration? I have no artistic talent to speak of so entrusting me with anything too taxing of that nature might not work out so well. Thanks Fraggle81 (talk) 11:23, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

Post to WP:STiki what you think it should look like. We'll see if we have any capable artists there. If not, I have some contacts. West.andrew.g (talk) 15:03, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

Hi I am one of the lead actors on Strings, I just felt that my name should be part of the list of the other lead actors on Strings. I worked very hard on the project as did the other leads. I know this is a small edit but its shows me that my contribution as a lead wasn't as important and I want my name to be recognised as part of this film.

Sidakbarali (talk) 18:41, 23 March 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for the message Sid, I agree. Fraggle81 (talk) 11:29, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

Hi, Fraggle81, this is SM55MGN again, in reference to the Blaenau Gwent election result accredited to Syd Morgan. I cannot prove it was me that stood both in 1983 and 1987 so I have reverted the reference to "S" which is referenced in(http://www.election.demon.co.uk/1983WC.html).At least this now doesn't say Syd. I do personally know Syd and was a member of Plaid Cymru National Executive at the same time as him. Syd never stood for Blaenau Gwent. Would this suffice? I was also a local councillor for Nantyglo and Blaina during this period. Best wishes. Steve (S55mgn (talk) 12:51, 24 March 2014 (UTC))

Hello Steve, that seems like a good compromise. I would of thought there would be a reliable reference somewhere for your standing, I'll see if I can dig anything up. Thanks Fraggle81 (talk) 17:12, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

Hi, I've noticed Pokemones was removed. I'm reading the article and the term appears out of nowhere without explaining the term. You put two and two together, but that should be explained. Do you think we could get back in there? 208.79.61.102 (talk) 13:16, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

Hi, the only problem is that the references don't seem to support the statement unless I'm missing something? Thanks Fraggle81 (talk) 17:15, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

Sorry, can you clarify? 208.79.61.102 (talk) 13:22, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

How was it no constructive? it was a fact — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sonic123cool (talk • contribs) 16:54, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

(talk page stalker)@Sonic123cool: First, please provide a link to the article in question, as we are not mind readers. Secondly, the entry was unsourced and needed a reliable source to back it up. K6ka (talk | contribs) 16:57, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

My Audrey is just as relevant as Audrey Lenka Milicevic who was born in 2012 and is supposedly going to be a genius. Just saying. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.22.196.62 (talk) 19:22, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

Ok well when you can show notability come back and add her. Thanks Fraggle81 (talk) 12:50, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

Hi Fraggle81, you are so kind and helpful. I too will see what I can find. Many thanks for your patience and understanding. Steve. --S55mgn (talk) 20:10, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

No problem, thanks Fraggle81 (talk) 12:51, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

Hi Fraggle81,

i am well aware that what i edited on secularity page was not the best way to convey the message. I would had put it across to editors but i wanted to make a point by making the article come into limelight quickly.

My questions still has not been answered.

"on the page of sabily wikipedia writes "Sabily includes a set of packages that customizes Ubuntu. Ubuntu is easy to use for a novice user,[3][4] with the most-used Office, Internet, Graphics and Video applications already installed.[3] With Sabily, Muslim users have “out of the box” Islamic software and tools installed as well. Sabily includes Islamic software (prayer times tool, Qur'an study tool, Hijri calendar etc.) and has a custom design."

and here it says sabily is secular... since when wikipedia became islamic agent?? is providing prayers, calendar etc. associated with a particular religion a secular activity? And of course when Saabily boots, it shows "allah is the only god" in arabic as per the screenshot displayed at wikipedia. that might also be a secular slogan.... i guess the whole world is now abusing a particular word for the appeasement of a particular class of people. but wikipedia, this was NOT expected from you.

I might be not a good linguistic around plus english is not my mother tongue which can have added effect for unclear understanding in this regards. Kindly clarify.

I'm not exactly sure what you're looking for from me. I'm not interested in debating my political or religious beliefs here particularly since I attempt to edit with neutrality. If you have issues with images on the page or the way things are written, either change them or take them to the talk page and discuss them with other editors. You know your edits weren't of an appropriate nature and it was for that reason they were reverted. Also could I ask when you leave a message you sign it with ~~~~ Thanks Fraggle81 (talk) 10:52, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Sorry new to this and thought it was sandbox :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.61.20.27 (talk) 00:20, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

No worries, happy editing. Fraggle81 (talk) 00:54, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

Mentions "Trodsham", Cheshire...It is, in fact, Frodsham/I made the change.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.7.79.246 (talk) 05:27, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

Hello, probably best you don't leave your email lying around. The change you made wasn't formatted correctly. I see you have re-done the edits, they look ok this time. Thanks Fraggle81 (talk) 05:33, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

Hi, you edited my comment on Harm de Blij. I read his book "Why Geography Matters" for a school class assignment. One of the students at my school edited Harm de Blij's page and made some, let's say interesting comments on his page. I simply corrected them. Harm did pass away on either March 26 or March 25, as one of the teachers at my school was friends with him and received a text message that said Harm had passed away due to bone cancer. I appreciate your step towards stopping vandalism, but the edit I made was indeed correct. Thank you for your time. :)

In response to your "correction" of my edits to Dave Finlay's page, I am letting you know that he is, in fact, known as "Fit" Finlay and to have you stop correcting my edits. Thanks

Hello, how about providing a reference for your edits and a signature for your talk page posts, thanks Fraggle81 (talk) 20:32, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

Sorry about adding the e, I was trying to use visual editor to chance guaranted to guaranteed, again sorry the reedman (talk) 18:35, 28 March 2014 (UTC)

No problem, thanks for the explanation. Fraggle81 (talk) 11:04, 29 March 2014 (UTC)

The table and new section that I have now added several times now keeps being taken down by you. Wikipedia states that you have taken this down due to vandalism, when everything in this chart is correct. I will put it back up again but if you take it down without a true reason, i shall have to report you for malicious editing.

On what planet are you living, I do my best to be polite but sometimes these messages are so absurd editors need telling. You wrote "click to go back" on an article, if you want to report me by all means go ahead, I cant imagine you are going to get the response you are expecting. Telling numerous established editors they are wrong and that you are going to report them wont win you any friends here. take the advice you have been given and move on, oh and for fucks sake leave a signature, I'm so tired of having no clue who I'm talking to. I would of deleted your message for not having one but as I said you need telling. Fraggle81 (talk) 23:35, 29 March 2014 (UTC)

You just reverted my edit without check it first. If you follow the link you'll see that the url for the Official Legislative Power Site is www.legiscba.gob.ar with 'gob' and not with 'gov'. I know that it's kind of strange that some websites had 'gov' and others 'gob' but that's the way it is. Just check the edits before doing anything.

The page in cuestion: Córdoba Province, Argentina

--190.229.2.70 (talk) 19:17, 29 March 2014 (UTC)

Hello, It's a good idea to leave an edit summary when you make changes, it makes mistakes much less likely. Thanks Fraggle81 (talk) 23:44, 29 March 2014 (UTC)

Dear Fraggle81, Hassan harmoush,born in 1918,is a pioneering and leading figure in the hospitality sector.In appreciation of his successful career and path,Harmoush received the Hospitality Services Lifetime Achievement Award in 2005 and finally The Lebanese Minister of tourism,Fady Abboud Awarded Sheikh hassan harmoush The Order of the Cedar on behalf of the president of the republic Michel Sleiman for his constant contribution to the country's hospitality industry. please agree to put his name on wikipedia. <hospitality news magazine > — Preceding unsigned comment added by Karim.M1997 (talk • contribs) 15:29, 30 March 2014 (UTC)

Hello, your edits were marked as minor when they are not. Thanks Fraggle81 (talk) 21:13, 30 March 2014 (UTC)

Why you edited Davispur, the information given by me was 100% correct. kindly re-paste deleted text. . . — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shahid72462 (talk • contribs) 15:53, 30 March 2014 (UTC)

Sorry but your edits do little for a page which already has numerous problems. Do not credit yourself on articles. You managed to leave your name on an article but failed to do so when you left me a message here. Fraggle81 (talk) 21:16, 30 March 2014 (UTC)

Hi there. User:KarimAntonov is continuing to vandalize Wikipedia articles. He also has a serious attitude problem. His account should be permanently blocked from editing. His user page does say his retired from Wikipedia, but he's still vandalizing articles. Furthermore, rudeness and un-civility are universal occurrences on the articles he's editing. Best regards Jonas Vinther (talk) 22:09, 30 March 2014 (UTC)

Hello Jonas, I'm not seeing any new edits by this user, his last edit was the March 18th. I think he's just someone who couldn't grasp how Wikipedia operates. If this user does start making edits again let me know and I'll see if there's anything I can do to get him editing productively if not he will undoubtedly get himself blocked anyway. Thanks Fraggle81 (talk) 22:12, 30 March 2014 (UTC)

I might have over-talked. I just noticed he had done many edits on the Jutland article since I last reverted his vandalism; I didn't really pay attention to the dates. Also, after seeing his user talk page was filled with "stop vandalizing articles" notifications I assumed he was still vandalizing, sorry for that. Jonas Vinther (talk) 22:21, 30 March 2014 (UTC)

No Worries, Thanks Fraggle81 (talk) 20:32, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

Hello - I edited the Broaster Company page based upon feedback from the community. I feel the changes were constructive based on the feedback from the original copy, so I am going to re-add them.

JenniferJaacks (talk) 20:14, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

And what feedback would that be? Your edits appear promotional and legal warnings should not be left anywhere here let alone an article. Fraggle81 (talk) 20:21, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

I need help to category a section — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mikeman1234 (talk • contribs) 03:32, 2 April 2014 (UTC)

Hello could you elaborate on what you want to do please? thanks. Fraggle81 (talk) 13:33, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

Why did you do this?

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Intelligence_Quotient_(IQ)_and_Browser_Usage&diff=602474049&oldid=602474011

It seems that a sortable table and the correct header formatting is superior to what's currently there.

2620:0:1000:3002:2E44:FDFF:FE26:89EB (talk) 21:22, 2 April 2014 (UTC)

That's strange, it's not an edit I recognise. I'll make the necessary changes, thanks. Fraggle81 (talk) 21:25, 2 April 2014 (UTC)

How many times do I need to answer this? I removed a duplicate paragraph. That is all.

Dacama (talk) 13:30, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

Try leaving an edit summary otherwise it looks like you just deleted a section of text with no explanation. Fraggle81 (talk) 13:32, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

How do I do that?

Dacama (talk) 13:36, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

I think I figured it out. Thanks.

Dacama (talk) 13:48, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

The paragraph I added to the page on Maria Miller

" It is widely considered by citizens of the UK that she has, so far, got off very lightly. Any other employee who was caught fiddling thousands of pounds on their expenses, and refused to co-operate with an investigation, would have been sacked, and probably prosecuted."

Is entirely accurate, and I feel that omitting it fails to convey the reaction of a greatmany UK citizens to this scandalous behavior.

PigletJohn82.18.100.187 (talk) 00:53, 5 April 2014 (UTC)

82.18.100.187 (talk) 00:53, 5 April 2014 (UTC)

That may be so but it is opinion not fact and as such has no place here. Fraggle81 (talk) 10:31, 5 April 2014 (UTC)

Read the following page User:MiszaBot/config, place the template and its parameters and the bot will automatically archive older discussions of your talk page. Eye snore (pc) 16:34, 5 April 2014 (UTC)

Hello Eyesnore, It's something I've thought about but never got round to. I generally just move things over at the end of every month. I'll more than likely get set up with it when I get some time though, thanks. Fraggle81 (talk) 22:23, 5 April 2014 (UTC)

In the nicest and politest way possible, I would appreciate it if you did not edit my talk page and I wont edit yours. If you don't want me here then ban my IP address otherwise, please stop reverting your changes on my talkpage. Thanks 82.25.35.100 (talk) 22:02, 5 April 2014 (UTC)

Unfortunately you have forfeit that right with your recent edits. You will undoubtedly be banned for your actions, come back when you want to work at building an encyclopaedia. If you want to make daft edits go use Facebook. Fraggle81 (talk) 22:04, 5 April 2014 (UTC)

Hi, There seems to be a misunderstanding. I'm not creating a page for myself, only a business I helped to found. Can you please remove any tags you've placed on my information? Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tonilanec (talk • contribs) 01:59, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

Hi I found it rude to delete what I contributed to the Arab American page! These people that I added are actually well known! Apparently you don't know them?! — Preceding unsigned comment added by CaliforniaButterfly (talk • contribs) 18:36, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

I find it rude that you are unable to follow the simple instruction of leaving a message with subject and signature. The people you added have no apparent notability, it makes no difference whether I know them or not - every one of the people you added was redlinked. When you can show these people are truly noteworthy add them back in. Fraggle81 (talk) 19:42, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

Hello Mr Fraggle81

With regards to the article on Eydie Gorme. In my opinion it is irrelevant to talk about their children's deaths, I think it is more constructive to expand on their personal lives rather than: "these are their names and this is how they died" so if my modifications on Eydie Gorme are something you did not find pleasing, and you are a big fan that perhaps knows more than i do, I would ask you to please do more research on the subject and either expand on the subjkect of her sons or delete everything.

Thanks

The recent edits that were under the page "Cormac" and were about the pronunciation were edits done by friends of mine in an attempt to make me angry. Two of them I believe were contributing (The WHOIS lookup confirms that the edits comes from the city they reside in). Unsure of your capacity to freeze their IP addresses or freeze the editing of the page except for logged in users. I leave it up to you and your power. Just thought I would let you know why the frequent edits were there. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.229.69.101 (talk) 04:25, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

It's ok, is just that somebody has been adding some false information and it started to be really annoying but aparently that person already stoped.

In fact, sorry for making you use your time in that. That was not my intention.

Bye!

I would like to point out that being entitled to first hand knowledge of Dr Halim's biography I have only attempted to expand in his wikipedia page. Starting with the spelling of his name which is not the way he spelled it or was identified with. Secondly I find his wikipedia page severely uninformative and lacking in details of his many deeds and long history. If you will please inform me of how I can contribute to this page without being edited out I will be grateful — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kmhalim (talk • contribs) 13:48, 9 April 2014 (UTC)

Hello, the problem with your edit was that you changed his name from what the title of the article said it was. Thanks Fraggle81 (talk) 07:51, 10 April 2014 (UTC)

I think you made a mistake on the WrestleMania XXX page. AJ Lee is AJ, not "Lee"! Why do you refer to AJ Lee as "Lee" rather than AJ? 19:16, 9 April 2014 (UTC)Unknown sender

Hello, firstly it is common for people to be referred to by their surnames in articles, secondly you added a random R in there when you made those edits. Thanks Fraggle81 (talk) 07:53, 10 April 2014 (UTC)

In the article on Berenice Abbott, there is a section which says

"Americans would be able to wrest control their cities from paleotechnic forces"

I changed it to read

"Americans would be able to wrest control of their cities from paleotechnic forces"

adding the word OF to make it grammatically correct. Without that preposition, the language in the sentence is not correct.

This is a small change, but adding correct language is constructive (In my opinion).

Jkalish00 (talk) 19:38, 9 April 2014 (UTC)

OK, Fraggle81, i'm confused. You removed my very minor but correct change. You did not respond to my note here. And then you let someone else make the same change. Have I missed something here?

Jkalish00 (talk) 03:03, 10 April 2014 (UTC)

I'm not here 24/7 and I have a life beyond Wikipedia so a reply might take some time. You added an "of" but you also changed New York to New Ydork. Fraggle81 (talk) 07:59, 10 April 2014 (UTC)

Wrong person. I'm not even familiar with Ms. Armatrading. (I just wanted to make sure that this gets directed to the correct person.) WhynotTHISTIME? (talk) 08:01, 11 April 2014 (UTC)

Somewhat cryptic.. I haven't left a message for you unless you were editing from an IP in which case its likely you have a dynamic IP address. Fraggle81 (talk) 08:37, 11 April 2014 (UTC)

I object to your removal of Jordan Skerritt from the Prince Rupert Secondary School's list of notable alumni. It is a school with few notable graduates, but as a graduate from the class of 1997, Jordan Skerritt is one of the most well known R&B singers to come out of the nothern BC area, and certainly more well known than the Gym teacher Mel Bishop, who is not, by the way a "legendary basketball coach". Thank you for your time and I appreciate you taking the time to read this as a citizen of Prince Rupert and a former member of the Prince Rupert Secondary school board (Served 1992-2009). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.176.184.210 (talk) 10:22, 12 April 2014 (UTC)

Hello, He doesn't appear notable and neither do the others mentioned which is why they have also been removed. Thanks Fraggle81 (talk) 13:53, 12 April 2014 (UTC)

      BRILLIANT INSTITUTE

Coaching institute of science and comerse opened in dhamtari. brilliant institute athvani Bali(dhamtari) institute of coaching of maths,science,physics,biology. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Amitwadhwani1 (talk • contribs) 10:36, 12 April 2014 (UTC)

Ok.. What has any of that got to do with you adding a j to an article? Fraggle81 (talk) 13:36, 12 April 2014 (UTC)

The comments I added to the page 'Hey Jude' were well researched and factual and I am offended that you reverted my comments.

Regards

NSS — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jamesd.morris (talk • contribs) 10:40, 12 April 2014 (UTC)

You sir are easily offended. Wikipedia operates a policy of No original research which is what your edits appear to be. Fraggle81 (talk) 13:51, 12 April 2014 (UTC)

Hello, could you please identify why my edit to Paracha article was reverted on 17 March 2014? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Awebuser (talk • contribs) 20:08, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

Hi I would like to address the mistake you made on the "First date the musical" page.you deleted from the song list "first impressions. (Reprise)" because it was not on the cast recording but I would like to tell you that I saw the show 4 times and I can truthfully confirm that the song does exist. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Klygtjfuj (talk • contribs) 12:38, 15 April 2014 (UTC)

I did not edit anything on the wikipedia page, if there was any edit, it was purely by accident. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.17.231.147 (talk) 13:57, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

Hello, that warning is three and a half years old and was undoubtedly given to someone who used your address previously. Its ok to ignore it, thanks. Fraggle81 (talk) 15:15, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

Hello,i am Biser Marinchev,the agent of Velizar Popov...I have changed his info about Perak FA , because we didn reach an agreemant with the club and he will not sign with the team,so this info who somebody changed is not correct,i am hisagent and i manage his info correct here.... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Biser Marinchev (talk • contribs) 16:38, 17 April 2014 (UTC)

Hi there

I noticed you reverted my good faith edits. Any particular reason? Thanks.

~~ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.127.32.124 (talk) 17:21, 17 April 2014 (UTC)

Hello, which edits would those be exactly? Fraggle81 (talk) 17:25, 17 April 2014 (UTC)

The comments to the Rat trap article .

2403:7900:ADE1:A1DE:250:56FF:FEA6:3B1F (talk) 22:43, 17 April 2014 (UTC)

GORUCK is not spelled with just a capitol g. The whole word is capitalized. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dakotah1978 (talk • contribs) 11:48, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

Doing that causes a redlink. Fraggle81 (talk) 22:45, 26 April 2014 (UTC)

what does this mean? and why was my edits changed. They were fully supported and factual knowledge on the Prep School. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Naps14 (talk • contribs) 15:58, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

I see you have already had this answered elsewhere, thanks. Fraggle81 (talk) 22:47, 26 April 2014 (UTC)

Mr./Ms. Fraggle81 (if that is your real name...),

My inquiry does not concern the validity of my edit to "Winthrop, Ma" (I was bored - sorry).

Instead, my question is this: How the hell did you catch it so fast? And, once having noticed it, how did you you deem it vandalism so quickly (yeah, I don't dispute your decision, but, come on, it wasn't that bad...)?

That's all. Hopefully you will answer this with equal speed...

Sincerely, A confused bored person

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.174.133.90 (talk) 21:35, 26 April 2014 (UTC)

Dear A confused bored person,

I use a tool called STIki to find instances of vandalism. Looking at the edit times that was quite a slow one actually, a lot of edits are flagged up within seconds and reverted with a warning given to the offending editor at the same time.

I hope this answers your question

Oh and by the way no it's not my real name, I just find my real name (Arthur McSquirrelbotherer) embarrassing so I opted for Fraggle81 which is marginally less cringeworthy.

All the best

Arthur McSquirrelbotherer

Dear editor previously known as Fraggle81,

Thank you for responding to my question. You answer has brought me considerable satisfaction. And as a parting note, I would like to add that this talky page (or whatever this whole Wikipedia editor place is called) is very hard to find - I had to mess up yet another article just to find the address of this place. So...uh...work on that, I guess.

Oh yeah, and don't feel obligated to keep fixing these changes I've made. Just let 'em fly under that STIki radar...no one even looks at the Winthrop page anyway...it can be our little secret...

Sincerely, A less confused but still continually bored person — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.174.133.90 (talk) 21:45, 3 May 2014 (UTC)

Based on the long felt gap for categorization and improvization of WP:MED articles relating to the field of physiology, the new WikiProject Physiology has been created. WikiProject Physiology is still in its infancy and needs your help. On behalf of a group of editors striving to improve the quality of physiology articles here on Wikipedia, I would like to invite you to come on board and participate in the betterment of physiology related articles. Help us to jumpstart this WikiProject.

Feel free to leave us a message at any time on the WikiProkect Physiology talk page. If you are interested in joining the project yourself, there is a participant list where you can sign up. Please leave a message on the talk page if you have any problems, suggestions, would like review of an article, need suggestions for articles to edit, or would like some collaboration when editing!
You can tag the talk pages of relevant articles with {{WikiProject Physiology|class=|importance=}} with your assessment of the article class and importance alongwith. Please note that WP:Physiology, WP:Physio, WP:Phy can be used interchangeably.
You will make a big difference to the quality of information by adding reliable sources. Sourcing physiology articles is essential and makes a big difference to the quality of articles. And, while you're at it, why not use a book to source information, which can source multiple articles at once!
We try and use a standard way of arranging the content in each article. That layout is here. These headings let us have a standard way of presenting the information in anatomical articles, indicate what information may have been forgotten, and save angst when trying to decide how to organise an article. That said, this might not suit every article. If in doubt, be bold!
Why not try and strive to create a good article! Physiology related articles are often small in scope, have available sources, and only a limited amount of research available that is readily presentable!
Your contributions to the WikiProject page, related categories and templates is also welcome.
To invite other editors to this WikiProject, copy and past this template (with the signature):
- {{subst:WP Physiology–invite}} ~~~~
To welcome editors of physiology articles, copy and past this template (with the signature):
- {{subst:WP Physiology–welcome}} ~~~~
You can feel free to contact us on the WikiProkect Physiology talk page if you have any problems, or wish to join us. You can also put your suggestions there and discuss the scope of participation.

Hoping for your cooperation! Diptanshu^Talk 13:06, 27 April 2014 (UTC)

In the first episode of The Sopranos when Christopher kills Emil the song playing is Bo Diddley's "I'm a Man" (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DB65Q4-opkI) not Muddy Waters' "Mannish Boy". "Mannish Boy" was a parody of "I'm a Man" and Bo Diddley later sued him over it. I changed this, but it was changed back, for some reason. You can see "I'm a Man" listed on The Sopranos' soundtrack here: http://www.amazon.com/Sopranos-Music-HBO-Original/dp/B00003A9MG/ref=sr_1_1?s=music&ie=UTF8&qid=1398630235&sr=1-1&keywords=the+sopranos+soundtrack — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.51.105.213 (talk) 20:31, 27 April 2014 (UTC)

Hi, thanks for the explanation Fraggle81 (talk) 15:23, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

you obviously feel that you have some sort of superiority here Kroma (talk) 12:16, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

I'm someone who has a good idea of Wikipedia's guidelines and also of what belongs in an encyclopaedia, superiority doesn't come into it. If you are unwilling or unable to work within the guidelines set out by Wikipedia and work productively with other editors then perhaps this isn't the place for you. Your edits are considered vandalism hence the revert and warning although I'm sure you already know that since you have previously received a final warning for editing the same page. Fraggle81 (talk) 15:22, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

I am simply helping out a School page by adding details Abayanil358 (talk) 23:14, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

Your additions are of a dubious nature. Fraggle81 (talk) 23:19, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

I'm a Lebanese from Armenian descendants ; Babikian family is a famous family here in Lebanon as it is in Syria and other countries . Please take in consideration this message . thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Manosbabikian (talk • contribs) 15:34, 29 April 2014 (UTC)

read this part of the first paragraph and the first sentence of the second paragraph of the article, and if you have seen the film, tell me if this makes sense:

On March 17, 1994, The Leprechaun is a thousand years old. Since that is his birthday, he can choose any woman to be his bride...he will marry his descendant in a thousand years time on St Patrick's Day...

In 1994, in modern-day Los Angeles,... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.76.187.180 (talk) 17:35, 29 April 2014 (UTC)

Shush — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.113.58.108 (talk) 19:06, 29 April 2014 (UTC)

50,000 Edit Star

awarded to Fraggle81 for joining the 50,000 Edit Club
Vjmlhds (talk) 02:52, 30 April 2014 (UTC)

Thank you, haven't seen one of those before :) Fraggle81 (talk) 10:52, 30 April 2014 (UTC)

You're welcome. I actually designed these awhile back. Just a little something for those who'd like to mark milestone edits. I also designed a 10K, 25K, and 100K star as well. Vjmlhds (talk) 17:49, 30 April 2014 (UTC)

You have twice reverted the correct weasel words warnings in this article, you have even decapitalised a correctly capitalised word "Rue" and recapitalised incorrectly capitalised words. I know Pondicherry well, and no-one would call it beautiful except in comparison with other, even worse, places. Rather than edit masses of incorrect textual matter, I used the accepted mechanism applied within Wiki to ask for corroboration of matters of opinion. Please undo your reversion, unless you can give a good reason for not doing so. Thanks Amitramgo (talk) 17:06, 1 May 2014 (UTC)

Greetings, I am a newbie & wrote about the above topic. I am surprised that this was deleted, as anyone from/related to Hansot is aware of these historical people. They are considered "saints" & are intrinsic to the unique culture of the town. It is like mentioning Jerusalem & excising Abraham. I was looking to expand upon the articles time-permitting. If I have made any etiquette errors, I apologise as I am learning the ropes. Thanks for your guidance.HANSOTI SHEIKH (talk) 13:07, 2 May 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for your message, the edits you made need to have verifiable references to go with them, thanks Fraggle81 (talk) 10:18, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

why are my edits not constructive?

she has gotten fat, and needs to lose some weight... I am trying to help.. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.142.250.139 (talk) 19:27, 2 May 2014 (UTC)

so talk to me on my talk page is just a lie??

Hello,

I wanted to let you know that your edit to my addition to the Burr and Burton Academy page was unnecessary. I attend this school and took it upon myself to update it to the best of my abilities. Pierce Fulton, an alum of Burr and Burton, is currently on tour DJing and has three of his own singles. I would consider him pretty well-known. I remember him attending this school and it is necessary that his name is added to the wiki.

Here is his page: https://www.facebook.com/PierceFulton — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.30.225.160 (talk) 20:12, 2 May 2014 (UTC)

He doesn't appear to have a Wikipedia page and very little shows on Google. Facebook pages hold no weight here since anyone can put anything they want on them.

Thanks Fraggle81 (talk) 10:18, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

Hi, I reverted your edit on human rights, with modifications. What was quoted to rouhani was said by khameni. I have rectified that. Sorry I was acting in good faith, ignore the "NOT" comment on the history. It was accidentally typed into the wrong part. It was supposed to be NOT rouhani.

Take care, (Wiki id2 (talk) 14:19, 3 May 2014 (UTC))

Dear Fraggle81,

I noticed that you reverted my contribution wherein I changed the description of Scrooge McDuck from "businessman" to "businessduck." Your stated basis for this reversion was that my edit was not constructive (or something along those lines, I cant seem to go back and find your comment). However, I think you may have been a bit hasty jumping to conclusions on this point, so please hear me out about why Scrooge should really be referred to as a businessduck. I would consider myself an expert in Ducktales as I have watched literally tens of episodes while waiting to get taken to school when I was in 1st grade and my brother even got me a five dvd set of some of my favorite episodes (the Troy episode the best).

First, as you may be able to gather from his name, Scrooge McDuck is not a man at all. Scrooge McDuck is clearly a duck and if his appearance isnt convincing enough, you may notice that he never wears pants (though he does wear spats and a top hat, though that is another issue). Not wearing pants is a telltale sign that a speaking Disney character is a duck and not a human or some other animal. See Donald Duck, Mickey Mouse, Pluto (wears pants though does not speak), Aladdin (though curiously, he doesnt wear a shirt usually), Launchpad McQuack, Gadget, Duckworth (the last three wear pants but are not ducks). The more you look into it, the more you will realize that across the Disney animation universe, ducks are always depicted without pants despite other accouterments. Consider for a moment that even Darkwing Duck forgoes the characteristic tights that so many superheroes prefer. Additionally, Scrooge can often be seen swimming in his money bin and swimming is a common activity among ducks as I'm sure you know. In summary, it is beyond dispute that Scrooge McDuck is actually a duck. For more reading, please refer to: http://allthetropes.orain.org/wiki/Half-Dressed_Cartoon_Animal.

Second, since Scrooge is a duck and not a man then he should not be referred to as a businessman. One would not refer to a seeing eye dog as a seeing eyeman or a pack mule as a packman (this last one one would not only be wrong but also confusing). In the same vein, I believe that it is just patently misleading to refer to Scrooge as a businessman since he is nothing of the sort. As an initial matter, no businessman could get very far in any business if he never wore pants and I think I have adequately established that while Scrooge even wears spats and a top hat, he never wears pants. But more importantly, Scrooge, through his own ingenuity and miserliness, has amassed a huge fortune, so large in fact that it requires a massive structure just to house it. Such a captain of industry, or as some might argue robber baron, would be deeply offended by such references that strip him of his species and things that make him so unique. Businessmen are a dime a dozen (though Scrooge might try to bargain you down to a nickel) but business ducks are truly unique and worthy of designation here on wikipedia and beyond.

I hope this was informative and that you reconsider your stance on how we should refer to everyone's favorite rich fat ca--er duck as a businessduck.

Your pal,

Darren — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.196.128.17 (talk) 00:10, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

Wow, you spent some time on that :) My thoughts are that Scrooge is an anthropomorphised duck (a duck with human characteristics) which would mean he has a human job - something that ducks in the wild wouldn't normally do and that is the job of businessman. Businessduck doesn't have a page although I did find some nice pictures through google images of business ducks (none of which were Scrooge)

Cheers Fraggle81 (talk) 10:18, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

...Duck Tales... ...woo-hoo... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.174.133.90 (talk) 01:01, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

Referring to this edit: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Finite_potential_well&diff=606899487&oldid=606852345 You messed up the coefficients. Is the even your subject area? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.94.8.227 (talk) 01:00, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

That has no relevance. You made changes without leaving an edit summary or any reference for your changes you also left "italic text" on the article. Fraggle81 (talk) 10:18, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

Hi,

I saw you mentioned it as adopted daughter and used word he in couple of locations. If you just want to ignore the change which is meaningful to a mistake thats your call, as it is your business. I believe in Wikepedia, to give me and rest of the world right information which is free of any mistakes. Even if read by only a single line.

Please look into it and fix it, which is meaningful,

Don't think you just are genius...look into the corrections. Rest is your call.

I dont have idea on sandbox and other features. Hence the request.

Regards Harish — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.62.182.42 (talk) 13:59, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

I will go easy on you since clearly your first language isn't English. "He" isn't referring to the daughter of Atal Bihari Vajpayee, it is referring to the man himself. The interests of an adopted daughter would have no place in this particular article. I have done you the courtesy of removing your email address from my talk page as well. Fraggle81 (talk) 14:10, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

please help translate this message into the local language

	The Cure Award
	In 2013 you were one of the top 300 medical editors across any language of Wikipedia. Thank you so much for helping bring free, complete, accurate, up-to-date medical information to the public. We really appreciate you and the vital work you do!

We are wondering about the educational background of our top medical editors. Would you please complete a quick 5-question survey? (please only fill this out if you received the award)

Thanks again :) --Ocaasi, Doc James and the team at Wiki Project Med Foundation

Thank you, I had no idea. Fraggle81 (talk) 20:38, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

Mr. Fraggle,

Speaking as an expert in business, I can attest to the fact that Scrooge is most certainly not a man, let alone a businessman. May I please turn your attention to the venerable Webster's dictionary:

busi·ness·man

ˈbiznisˌman,-mən/

noun: businessman; plural noun: businessmen; noun: businesswoman; plural noun: businesswomen

   a man who works in business or commerce, especially at an executive level.

It should be clear from the second word of this definition that it clearly doesn't apply to Mr. McDuck. Now, let's do a simple find and replace and see what we come up with:

busi·ness·duck

ˈbiznisˌduck'

noun: businessduck; plural noun: businessducks

   a duck who works in business or commerce, especially at an executive level.

That sounds more like it. Being that our subject is a fictional character, living in Duckburg, I don't think that the good people at Webster's would mind our slight modification to their canon. May I also point out that many elements in the Ducktales universe (including the name of the show itself) are portmanteaus or neologisms containing the word duck. This theme adds weight to the businessduck argument.

I really think you should reconsider your position. Wikipedia is meant to be the collective knowledge of the world and accuracy is key. By simplifying terms and standardizing character types we lose the beauty of language. Please, keep hope alive.

Thanks,

Carey

And...

as stated before...

Duck Tales

woo-hoo — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.174.133.90 (talk) 01:27, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

Hi Fraggle81,

I didn't make the edit that you reverted. I'm a university student and I believe they use dynamic IP so I imagine some other student did it, but thank you for maintaining the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.64.136.187 (talk) 03:38, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

Why do you every time revert my contribution. I have evidence and it is sure not a vandalism. Have you watched the World snooker championship this year? (131.111.185.11 (talk) 21:23, 6 May 2014 (UTC))

Give a valid reference then. Fraggle81 (talk) 21:24, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

In the BBC intro, or any televised snooker matches, Rob walker always says this straight away. "Blink and you will miss him, the rocket, Ronnie O'Sullivan." (131.111.185.11 (talk) 21:32, 6 May 2014 (UTC))

Here it is: http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/snooker/17979736. Search blink and you'll miss him. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.111.185.11 (talk) 21:47, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for providing that Fraggle81 (talk) 20:36, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

Stating facts from real life experience = reverted content, REALLY, c'mon man!!! Get a new hobby! Pappyhelm (talk) 20:40, 11 May 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pappyhelm (talk • contribs) 18:22, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

Facts require a reference. As the IP editor who reverted your edits after me said your edits had a promotional tone. Fraggle81 (talk) 20:35, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

Refactoring comments after you have had a reply is frowned upon here. I'm inclined to remove the whole conversation and I will should further refactoring take place. As you have made those changes i will reply to them - real life experience = original research and still requires a reference. Fraggle81 (talk) 20:49, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

OK refractor police, how about you become original and quit copying every magazine and book word for word to boost your edit stars. WOW Pappyhelm (talk) 22:57, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

What on earth are you talking about? I'm not sure you even know yourself. Could you please inform me what I am supposed to have plagiarised and also what "edit stars" are since I'm at a loss to explain either. Fraggle81 (talk) 13:56, 12 May 2014 (UTC)

Hello, Fraggle81. Please check your email; you've got mail!
Message added 15:06, 14 May 2014 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Nikkimaria (talk) 15:06, 14 May 2014 (UTC)

That was fast! TreefrogCalidryas (talk) 16:17, 16 May 2014 (UTC)

Yeah, got to love STiki. There is no need for apology, if you genuinely mean it then please avoid making unconstructive edits and maybe have a go at making some constructive ones? All the best. Fraggle81 (talk) 16:23, 16 May 2014 (UTC)

thank you! no problem for the edit undo! I am new here and thought of correcting some spellings in your articles. anyways, no problem. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Comicshead (talk • contribs) 06:20, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

Why would an 8-year-old (and therefore inaccurate) picture be preferable to a new, more attractive and technically superior one?NewCrossGater2014 (talk) 09:05, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

Hi Fraggle 81

Can I ask why you removed my addition to the "All Hallows Preparatory School" page regarding redundancies that were made? I think that this is as important as stating that a new classroom was built in 2006 and an extension was built in 2007. All of which go to catalogue the changing financial fortunes of the school, which is an important part of its history and also mirrors the wider economy - boom years 'till circa '07/08, followed by recession, and who knows what the future holds. I am making assumptions, but I suspect that my edit was removed because you either: a) thought it was untrue, or b) thought it too trivial and I would genuinely like to know the reason for its removal and whether it might be re-instated. Many thanks, Cranmore Queen — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cranmore Queen (talk • contribs) 19:44, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

Dear Fraggle, I apologise for my unconstructive edit in October 2013. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.234.79.66 (talk) 20:21, 22 May 2014 (UTC)

my bad. accident — Preceding unsigned comment added by Robbysheia (talk • contribs) 13:44, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

How much does Wikipedia pay Fraggle81 an hour for all the time put into editing?

Is anyone here? No? OK, nothing here. Move on. Glad I don't own stock in Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.222.115.254 (talk) 22:51, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

why did you censor my edit? Eric Staller---- — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eric Staller (talk • contribs) 23:10, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

I think your undo is right

Here is my grateful apologize. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 123.240.39.178 (talk) 15:27, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

Sir, I believe you made a mistake. I live within the London city limits. I think I would know what happens in my home town. Maybe you should worry about your own business. I wouldn't question any facts you give me. Show me some friggin respect why don't you?ᾒᾩα — Preceding unsigned comment added by Scootercat2828 (talk • contribs) 19:59, 31 May 2014 (UTC)

Maybe you should stop leaving comments about gay schoolchildren on articles? You leave such messages here and you're making it my business. You have done nothing to deserve any respect from me or anyone else here. Here's a fact for you - respect is earned. Fraggle81 (talk) 20:12, 31 May 2014 (UTC)

I made my first Wikipedia edits ever to the Beehive article, Perone Hive section. Note that I am an expert on this topic and the good faith edits I made improved the write-up significantly. You reverted 3 of my edits, perhaps because I broke a rule I'm unaware of. Vernon Strength (talk) 08:08, 2 June 2014 (UTC) Vernon Strength

Dear Fraggle81,

You have reverted my edit on article "Prigrevica" on a basis that it was not constructive. Have you ever been to Prigrevica? Seems to me that you haven't. What I said about that village's inhabitants is easily verifiable for anyone who live there or in its vicinity. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.189.146.193 (talk) 11:12, 2 June 2014 (UTC)

I agree, my edit was not constructive. But neither were the previous admin edits/messages which just said that I'd done it wrong but offered no useful help about doing it right. Nicholas Frost (talk) 12:00, 4 June 2014 (UTC)

I am not sure why you did. He is a member of us. His grandfather's last name is Henry, and his family comes through Nova Scotia(acadia), and many are descendants of Edmee Lejuene and Catherine Lejuene daughters of Henri Membertou(Grand Chief). Look it up before you remove it please. His family includes Arsenault, Bourdages, Bourg, Landry, Breaux, and even Marguerite Marie Mius D'Entremont as a grandmother.

Reference Genealogies of Justin Bieber (focusing on his mother’s side) – ^[1] ^[2] ^[3] ^[4]

174.0.234.185 (talk) 17:11, 4 June 2014 (UTC) Emile LeClerc

When will you fix the edit that you removed without thinking about for Justin Bieber? He is Acadian too. 174.0.234.185 (talk) 22:15, 4 June 2014 (UTC) Emile

Hello, I recently made an edit to the Grants Pass High School page to create a list of notable alumni from the high school and found out today that you reverted the change. I'm sorry you didn't find it constructive, as I only had one person on the notable alumni list: Tanner Westman, who goes by the online moniker "KimTheNukeJongUn", as seen on his Twitter account here. He is a well-known person in the League of Legends eSports scene who does a lot of writing and moderating, as well as administrating tournaments, and I feel he deserves a spot as a notable alumni from the school. 71.92.151.150 (talk) 03:24, 7 June 2014 (UTC)

Mr. or Mrs. Fraggle, Many of the pages that I visit on Wikipedia are well-done, well-written and researched...pages that make me proud to be associated with the Wiki community, and then there is this one. History of South Carolina is a poorly-written ("The cotton gin made the rich soil of the lowlands very profitable for plantations operated by black slaves. The hilly upland areas, with few slaves, were much poorer and a regional conflict underlay the political system."), did black slaves operate the plantations? The "upland areas" are not, in fact, hilly. They are mountainous. "Underlay," really, is that the proper word there?

"The Civil War proved devastating to the whites, but freed the blacks from slavery. From 1865 to 1877, South Carolina underwent Reconstruction." The war freed blacks? (see the issue there, war cannot free, and people of African descent are not 'blacks' they are Black People, or African-Americans, or 'enslaved peoples.')

"A Republican legislature supported by Freedmen, northern Carpetbaggers and white Southern Scalawags created and funded a public school system, and created social welfare institutions." This is what Radical Reconstruction did?

Scots Irish or Scots-Irish...which is it?

The section on Nullification is poorly written and, I would argue, biased.

In the section entitled "Secession and War" the author blatantly misleads readers: "All of the violations of the alleged rights of Southern states mentioned in the document (the Declaration of Immediate Causes) were about slavery. President Buchanan protested but made no military response aside from a failed attempt to resupply Fort Sumter via the ship Star of the West, which was fired upon by South Carolina forces and turned back before it reached the fort." Wrong.

Shall I go on?

While I understand the smaller, lesser entries here may be granted a little more leeway on factual evidence, the larger entries must be valid and beyond reproach. They also must be well-written. This entry is neither. How can this be fixed? Please let me know.

Until I hear from you again

mcdopper — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mcdopper (talk • contribs) 21:41, 7 June 2014 (UTC)

undo the edit — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.207.58.59 (talk) 18:34, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

No Fraggle81 (talk) 18:52, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

Hello! I would just like to inquire about why you undid my revision on the Chew (comics) page. My revision was as follows: "===Victuspeciosian===

Able to create facial beauty masks out of foods that "yield amazing, even impossible, transformational results". Judy Heinz-Campbell is a victuspeciosian."

I believe this revision is completely relevant to the article and should be listed under "Food-Related Powers" as this power was formally introduced to the Chew universe in issue #029 and page 8. It is even more relevant than some of the other minor powers listed in the article, for some of them did not have the traditional introductory page like this one.

Raiskream (talk) 21:15, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for reverting my edit. I misread the edit I was reverting and thought I was reverting vandalism when I was actually reverting the reversion of vandalism. Paisarepa (talk) 21:59, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

No problem, thanks Fraggle81 (talk) 10:37, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

Hi Fraggle and thanks for your antivandal reverting of Big Stick ideology. Just a (minor) heads up:

Your edit summary for edit reads "Reverted 1 edit by 207.172.56.33 identified using STiki" when in fact your edit reverted two edits by the vandal.

Cheers, CapnZapp (talk) 10:31, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

That would be an issue with STiki since the edit summary is produced automatically. Thanks Fraggle81 (talk) 10:36, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

how did you know i edited it?Barracobmx (talk) 14:46, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

Crystal ball. Next Fraggle81 (talk) 14:49, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

Listen, Fraggle, I don't care whether you consider the truth "constructive" or not. Cross Creek Program is NOT, in any way, shape or form, a therapeutic boarding school. However, the wiki article wrongly called it such. I changed this to reflect the TRUTH. I changed the identification of it from a therapeutic boarding school (which it is not) to the accurate identification of it as a lock-down, behavioral modification facility. *** Do you really consider accuracy in language to be "unconstructive"? A lot of people come to Wikipedia and trust this resource as an accurate collection of info. It is wrong to mislabel businesses, as businesses they are not. I didn't even post anything controversial or contested, so this debate is unreasonable. I don't mean to "jump down your throat" here, but this is a small but important distinction that should not be such a big deal that I need to write an essay explaining why I changed it from "therapeutic boarding school" to "lock-down behavioral modification facility". A small article improvement is turning into a big headache for me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.186.218.22 (talk) 15:58, 11 June 2014 (UTC) Ah, perhaps you redid my edit because I improperly changed the text...I have gone back now and done it properly. So, if the case is that you reverted my edit not for content but for improper revision, nevermind the above. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.186.218.22 (talk) 16:18, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

You are indeed correct, thanks. Fraggle81 (talk) 21:46, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

All that I wrote about Terry Durham can be easily verified by anyone who knew him. He was a complex character but not a saint by any means SCLAUSmr30 (talk) 16:55, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

That would be original research. Wikipedia needs verifiable sources not word of mouth. Fraggle81 (talk) 21:46, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

So you deleted my post on the historical rivals section of Rivalries in the National Football League, I don't get how that's not productive, is it really that hard to google raiders vs. steelers rivalry and see how they are indeed worthy of mention on a page like that? Al Mendez — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.205.201.180 (talk) 23:37, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

Could you provide some valid references please? Thanks. Fraggle81 (talk) 21:48, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

But I created the page and have every right to make any reversion myself. So. I think you should allow me do what I want to do. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Theabyssinian (talk • contribs) 20:10, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

You do not own the page even if you originally created it, other editors have made contributions. Fraggle81 (talk) 21:48, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

Hi!

I don't understand your removal of either

or the photograph of "Sandy on her day off" either of which are current examples of the subjectmatter.

Dollist (talk) 21:23, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

Hello, wonderful as your additions were they weren't really appropriate for where you were putting them. Thanks Fraggle81 (talk) 21:50, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

Hello Fraggle81,

I have changed the titles of Ondi's films to all capital letters because that is their OFFICIAL format on IMDB. In addition to this, please stop changing her name from Ondi to Andrea, as she goes by Ondi in the professional world. I took a lot of time to provide links to each of the key words which you then changed back to original format and would greatly appreciate it if you could leave the page alone and allow Wikipedia users to go to Ondi's page and be able to access multiple facets of information. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tashortall13 (talk • contribs) 21:34, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

Your changes broke the formatting of the page and some of the links changed to redlinked. Taking this to the talk page would be a good idea since continuing to revert back to the capitalised version is going to get you a warning and possible block. Fraggle81 (talk) 21:52, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

hi the information on adhyayan suman is false and so is his date of birth please let me make changes otherwise i would have to write to wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arianaayam1303 (talk • contribs) 14:09, 15 June 2014 (UTC)

Ok, go ahead and write to Wikipedia, but do me a favour and provide me a copy of what you write, Thanks! Fraggle81 (talk) 14:18, 15 June 2014 (UTC)

Hello Fraggle81, Caitanya108 here.

I was trying to put perspective into an article about Anti-Hinduism, but my additions keep disappearing. With all that negative stuff I knew the Hindus who would arrive there needed some support in all that gloom, and I am capable of giving them that, of protecting their faith.

And yes I am new here, more or less. I tried a few times yesterday and each time the edit would vanish - I thought I had done something incorrectly. Today I tried again, and after giving up, I noticed the 'TALK' messages which lead me here.

Have I done something wrong or were there just too many attempts or do I have to prove that I am someone worthy of being quoted (like Francis Xavier who truly knows nothing about the topic except that he is implicated in the article as a prime offender of the Hindu tradition)?

I am certainly qualified to make the statements I made in the introduction to the wives' tales that are told in the west about Hindu culture, even qualified to diagnose the underlying cause for the offenses.

I would appreciate any assistance you could offer. I am not a crank, as you can deduce from my spiritual website http://CauseOfAllCauses.com - the greatest place on the web, the only reason the web exists. And yes, that was a bunch of hyberbole, humour not psychosis. A little joy for your day!

Caitanya108 (talk) 14:59, 15 June 2014 (UTC)

Hello Caitanya, Wikipedia requires that what is written is verifiable by reliable external references. Editors cannot leave their own viewpoint on articles. see WP:NOR for some guidance and a better explanation. Thanks Fraggle81 (talk) 15:06, 15 June 2014 (UTC)

But it seems we have a very rude quote allegedly made by a Catholic Saint based on a third-hand reference in some obscure book. Do I need to put my quote on my webpage and reference it there to be 'verifiable' - that a well-known widely-read Hindu saintly person says "yadda yadda yadda" about those people who deride Hinduism? Would that meet the criteria? The Mahatma says "They are insincere and therefore commit great offense".

Caitanya108 (talk) 15:16, 15 June 2014 (UTC)

I was in school and was trying to input something constructive but a hacker messed my words up. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 168.229.129.9 (talk) 12:55, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

Right.... Fraggle81 (talk) 20:58, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

Hi

I work for the Professional Association for Childcare and Early Years. I have replaced the content as requested by our Legal team and Head of Policy and Communications at PACEY.

I can see that the recent changes I made to our Wiki page have been rejected and the old content has been removed.

The old content is very out of date. As mentioned, the new content has been requested by our Legal team and Head of Policy and Communications at PACEY.

Please replace with the recent changed content - the text I literally just updated is below in case you haven't kept a copy of it:

(Redacted)

Please confirm when this has been done. We need the inaccurate out of date content removed, hence why I changed this.

PACEYchildcare (talk) 13:48, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

Monty Python fan are we? Fraggle81 (talk) 20:57, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

Just a comment on Duffy's quality. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.108.212.200 (talk) 14:27, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

Tyrus is going to be a first round NFL draft pick and I thought it would be worthy to give a small town a little bit of notoriety. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.15.127.195 (talk) 14:43, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for the message. To be added as someone who is notable a person should generally have their own Wikipedia page that has been accepted by the community. I would suspect he will have a page created soon so when he does have another go at resubmitting your edit. Thanks Fraggle81 (talk) 20:56, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

Dear Fraggle,

I am afraid you have made a mistake in deeming the content regarding the "Twerk Team" at scripps ranch high school as unconstructive. This event gained the attention of the national media, civil rights groups and activists, and served as a reminder that freedom is not everywhere in the United States, and raised questions and eyebrows in what we are teaching our children.

There are over 451,000 articles on Google alone in regards to this subject, I strongly encourage you to research this matter and you will see that it is all true, important, and very relevant. In fact, it is THE most talked about issue regarding Scripps Ranch High School, ever. This was subject of national controvery for months, and quite frankly I believe it even deserves its own sections under "controversy" or "civil rights breach".

Thank you for your time and consideration. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.89.104.194 (talk) 19:02, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for the message. There were various problems with your submission, the main one is that it doesn't cite any references. Also it is not necessary to censor words on Wikipedia (see WP:NOTCENSORED). Thanks Fraggle81 (talk) 20:51, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

Hi, I added that entry even though the page currently doesn't exist because I have drafted the page and it is currently being reviewed. It will (hopefully) be accepted very soon, and so the link will not be dead for long.

Thanks, Fleetyfox (talk) 20:42, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

Probably best to wait for the article to be created before you add the links, thanks Fraggle81 (talk) 20:48, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

You Said Rihanna is the youngest artist to sell out FNB Stadium but Justin bieber is very much younger than Rihanna, he did it faster and months before Rihanna — Preceding unsigned comment added by MyNameIsHair (talk • contribs) 20:44, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

No I didn't, I removed your personal commentary from the article. Fraggle81 (talk) 21:00, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

Not my edit, someone messing abut on my computer. Sorry. 92.26.9.223 (talk)Andrew

There are some vandals adding contentious claims to Singer's page-here and here. The vandalism comes as no surprise after the US Supreme Court ruled Singer victorious over Argentina.

I noticed you recently reverted some edits to the page and just wanted to let you know I did as well. I will be keeping a close eye on the page to ensure none of the vandal IP users edits keep, as they are false, biased, and unsourced. Thanks! Meatsgains (talk) 12:47, 17 June 2014 (UTC)

Please do not use rollback to revert edits that are not obvious vandalism, as you did in this edit. I have no problem with reverting unsourced additions to a BLP, but you should at least use an edit summary. In this case, it's not too difficult to do a Google search and locate the source for the quotation, and I have done so. The addition was verifiable, even if it wasn't properly sourced through an inline citation. On borderline cases like this, I really do think rollback is unwarranted. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 19:18, 17 June 2014 (UTC)

Please assume good faith. Out of the 62142 edits I have made over the past seven and a bit years most have involved rollback and that I can think of this is my first complaint regarding its use. Sometimes mistakes happen and if it's genuinely an error then I am happy to rectify it. Fraggle81 (talk) 00:03, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

Yes, I've seen your edits on other articles, and you do good work. I apologize if my curt talk page messages come on too strong. Recently, that page has attracted a lot of drama, including an editor with an admitted COI who tried to censor all criticism. So, you unknowingly wandered into a place where patience was a bit short. Sorry about that. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:47, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

Thank you, no problem I can be somewhat curt myself even when I don't mean to be. All the best Fraggle81 (talk) 12:59, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

I've just seen your message about reverting my edit. I took the photograph. It has been stolen and published without my (or anybody's) consent. My edit was intended to reflect and slightly correct that state of affairs. If that was inappropriate, perhaps you could tell me how to get the image removed altogether? Towsley Venn Carr (talk) 22:02, 17 June 2014 (UTC)

Hello, thanks for the message. You can have a look at Wikipedia:Request for immediate removal of copyright violation which should help you with this matter. If you need any further help let me know. Thanks Fraggle81 (talk) 00:11, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

Hi. You said my edit of the Maria la del Barrio page wasn't constructive. The reason I put "Yes, Soraya dies FOR REAL this time" was because the Soraya character had died two times previously in the series, so I was confirming that it was her ultimate death. No vandalism intended. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.140.189.70 (talk) 01:32, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for the message, you need to try rewording it in an encyclopaedic way since the way it's worded at present is just you leaving a message on an article. Capitals are rarely appropriate if you have to use them for emphasis then the tone of the text you are writing is more than likely not suited to the style of writing here. Fraggle81 (talk) 13:19, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

I added my name to the list of Wiseman's. Please explain the problem. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.86.53.161 (talk) 18:31, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

Apart from a conflict of interest you need some evidence of notability to be listed on Wikipedia. Fraggle81 (talk) 18:34, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

Hello there,I saw the message on the Cullybackey wiki page. I understand why it was removed and would like to say that I'm not offended.

But never the less I believe that the page entry was 100% factual as I happen to know a person who is a neighbour to the 'Coco' I write about.

I am happy enough to re-write it under your consent,hope you can chose soon wether to let me re-write it or not. {by the way,your not the first to delete the entry}

All the best--Obvious Llama (talk) 20:16, 18 June 2014 (UTC)Obvious Llama

I edited the page because I think I have made a contibution to Luthra clan. I am an engineer educated in England and am a writer who writes romance novels highlighting the problems of the poor and expose' of corrupion in India. you can visit my web site (Redacted) and Also confirm from Amazon-Kindle about my books. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vinod Luthra (talk • contribs) 21:48, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

When you can show evidence of notability your inclusion may be considered. Fraggle81 (talk) 10:54, 19 June 2014 (UTC)

Hi

I think this is a constructive editing, People who search 'Shaolin Kung Fu', Want to understand and learn the genuine Shaolin Kung Fu, I created an external link, because we are genuinly Shaolin Kung Fu Academy, located in Shaolin Temple, Henan Province, China. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chinese Kung Fu (talk • contribs) 00:37, 19 June 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia is not for advertising or promotion. Fraggle81 (talk) 10:53, 19 June 2014 (UTC)

	The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
	Thanks for your swift work in dealing with that determined vandal at the Kevin McCarthy article. MelanieN (talk) 21:15, 19 June 2014 (UTC)

Thank you Melanie, very kind. Fraggle81 (talk) 21:26, 19 June 2014 (UTC)

Hello, i had to undo your latest change as it is found to be harmful to Wikipedia readers. The promotion of rogue software is not safe for internet users and I wish for you to stop.

Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.190.0.110 (talk) 03:19, 20 June 2014 (UTC)

Your edits removed the infobox of the page as well as the categories and external links section. Fraggle81 (talk) 09:34, 20 June 2014 (UTC)

Why did you remove the added wedding date i added ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tbm010 (talk • contribs) 14:02, 20 June 2014 (UTC)

Edits require references to back them up particularly those to Biographies of living people. Fraggle81 (talk) 19:33, 20 June 2014 (UTC)

That is where a Citation needed is for like with her date of birth. Tbm010 (talk) 18:50, 21 June 2014 (UTC)

That's not how it works. I could by that reasoning write any statement I like and pass it off as fact just by adding ^{[citation needed]}. Fraggle81 (talk) 16:58, 21 June 2014 (UTC)

Hmmm also true. But how to add a fact, a friend of her that went to the wedding tweeted about it and there is a facebook page of the wedding (https://www.facebook.com/media/set/?set=a.10151811669904000.1073741842.94284273999&type=3) but with no firstline information. I realize it needs a third party confirmation (hens the Citation needed) Tbm010 (talk) 19:12, 21 June 2014 (UTC)

I was not advertising my blog in anyway but making the visitors aware of the Recipe for the particular food. It is strange there are many such instances where I have seen people not only advertising the site but earning alot of revenue from it and there is no action taken on such content and When I am not earning anything on my website as well I am being asked to remove the link from Wikipedia.

I believe in free and open source world and this is exactly why I want to help others find the recipes quicker. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.44.247.180 (talk) 15:26, 21 June 2014 (UTC)

It's strange that you say you want to help people find the recipes quicker yet you removed the recipe from the article and substituted it with a link to your blog. Just because others may not yet have been removed doesn't give you carte blanche to go and add your own link. I also find it interesting you are leaving this message as an IP editor rather than your logged in account of Mayursha, any good reason for that? Fraggle81 (talk) 15:46, 21 June 2014 (UTC)

Hi Fraggle81, I hope I am correctly logged in before replying to this one- I did not realise that I was not logged in while mentoning the coment and when I did, I could not update the same- I am new to this User Talk pages and hence finding it difficult to maintain your speed. With regards to the page, I removed for a simple reason that it was not correct and up to date. The Authentic recipe is quite different from what was mentioned there. If that is the reason you can keep the Recipe up there and provide the link as an alternative one. I dont mind doing that. You may also want to check all Bollywood movies pages where one of the fake sites Bollywood Box Office has been updating their Box Office links and reviews on everypages since years and they are not being removed for any reason. Their site has many ads and earning revenue in the name of Wikipedia - which is already known by alot of news channels yet no action being taken by you guys. I would appreciate you take action on such cases rather than pointing fingers on us genuine contributors who want to do something good for the society and visitors. Mayursha <Not sure how do i put the timestamp>

Hi, I delete a part which was not only poorly written but also very much besides the point. The main story hear is the significance of Capo Bojar for the exploration of Africa, not the ecological consequences of fishing in the Antlantic, which might be an excellent topic to write about in a separate article.

Thanks, Kees — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.157.121.121 (talk) 10:55, 22 June 2014 (UTC)

Hi, Don't see my last admission, so I try once again

I deleted a part which was not only poorly written but also totally unrelated to the major item here, which is the relevance of Capo Bojares to the exploration of Africa. This section seems to be about the consequence of fischery on the wildlife, which can be an excellent article in itself, but not here and then with better factual basis please!

Best regards, Kees

PS perhaps I should get a Wikipedia account, I'm just an active user who sometimes makes corrections to articles which really seem to miss the point. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.157.121.121 (talk) 11:03, 22 June 2014 (UTC)

Why would you talk about the Mormon garments as sacred and not to be publicly displayed, but then you display a picture for all to see? Please tell me how that makes sense. It's very disrespectful.

Ash325 (talk) 14:11, 22 June 2014 (UTC) Ash325

I haven't talked about anything, you removed a properly referenced section from an article with no explanation and I reverted your change. Wikipedia is not censored so removing pictures from the page is inappropriate. See WP:NOTCENSORED Fraggle81 (talk) 22:33, 22 June 2014 (UTC)

Hi Fraggle81,

I'm working for ENBD and we are trying to upload official content signed by our corporate division. Do you want me to send it to you or I upload it by myself? :)

I look forward to hearing from you soon.

Best

Tarek — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mediavestdubai (talk • contribs) 06:41, 23 June 2014 (UTC)

Hello Tarek,

Neither. This is an encyclopaedia not a medium for businesses to promote themselves. I advise you see WP:COI. Thanks Fraggle81 (talk) 09:19, 23 June 2014 (UTC)

Content of page " Ingrid Parewijck " states irrelavant information of the past (harming the professional image of that person. Kindly remove "newsflashes "from the past and stick to the personal facts: a Belgian-born model. Thank you for paying respect. I am sure we all have done stupid things in our life at some point. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Belgajules (talk • contribs) 08:18, 23 June 2014 (UTC)

Those are the dangers of being in the public eye, you do something wrong and it never really goes away thanks to the internet. Removing this information from Wikipedia doesn't make it go away since the original references are still providing that information. Making an issue of such things generally makes them more public rather than them going away due to the Streissand effect. Fraggle81 (talk) 09:30, 23 June 2014 (UTC)

Why do you keep inserting false information on "personal life" of Alireza Haghighi? This is false, I also have sources, both personal and news from respected and well known news agencies denying this statement (the relationship between Elnaz and Alireza). By the way, his father is not the CEO of Mellat Bank. You don't need to know him in personal to know that, just google it and read on the banks site. Would be really thankful if you didn't insert that false statement on his personal life. I am one of his relatives and as you know, Iran is not a country where two people, especially celebrities can have a "public" relationship without trouble from the police etc. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eshghijoon (talk • contribs) 15:40, 23 June 2014 (UTC)

I see you received a message from Materialscientist about this issue. I also note that a recently created account is making very similar edits to the ones you have been making which is somewhat unusual. WP:SOCK might be worth a read? Fraggle81 (talk) 19:23, 24 June 2014 (UTC)

Man Suk, Gwanchang, Jin Mun, Wu Shu from Hwarang Segi. I have hwarang segi's book. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Xhandraverona (talk • contribs) 06:15, 24 June 2014 (UTC)

Ok what I can gather you added a name which didn't apparently show evidence of notability and I removed it? If that is the issue then you need to leave adequate references to show the person is notable. Thanks Fraggle81 (talk) 19:18, 24 June 2014 (UTC)

I was investigating it, what it does, how to use it, clicking around and suddenly there you were at the top of the leaderboard of stikites, or whatever you are called. Had to acknowledge this great work, so here I am.

Have a nice day. -Roxy the dog (resonate) 10:40, 24 June 2014 (UTC)

Thanks Roxy! I'm not sure there is a correct term, I usually go with STikees. How did you go with STiki? Will you be STicking around? Cheers Fraggle81 (talk) 19:07, 24 June 2014 (UTC)

Well, I asked for, and got, rollback, yesterday, which means I will be investigating properly today. -Roxy the dog (resonate) 09:30, 25 June 2014 (UTC)

... and having investigated, I have found it interesting so far, making things considerably easier to do - warnings and messages to users etc, but it certainly exercises the judgement muscles! -Roxy the dog (resonate) 16:33, 25 June 2014 (UTC)

It becomes addictive after a while, I've read a lot of articles I wound never have otherwise. It's very rewarding as long as you can handle the abusive messages and the people telling you you're wrong on a regular basis (sometimes I am

). Fraggle81 (talk) 12:52, 28 June 2014 (UTC)

Hi. You recently undid a selection of my edits on Smartphone (it says you reverted 1, but you reverted them both). I think it falls under G4 mentioned on your reversion page. My first edit was meant to update some statistics on a table, but it ended up editing the whole article instead of the section I asked it to (Historical sales figures (in millions of units)), resulting in only the section I edited remaining (this looks like vandalism). I edited the page again to add the content I removed but keep the changes I'd made, but you undid both the edits. I was just wondering, should I re-add the content, or was updating the table an error on my part? Thanks! --User:Kris159 (talk – legacy) 18:22, 24 June 2014 (UTC)

Hello Kris, updating the table is fine (as long as it's well referenced. The revert was for the removal of content and the issue with the edit summary saying reverted one when it was actually multiple has come up before and needs looking into. Thanks for the message. Fraggle81 (talk) 19:15, 24 June 2014 (UTC)

Dear Fraggle81 you explained that the this was undone because it did not appear constructive, but I added to Major championship competitions under the heading Championships. The one championship currently in there does not currently run. The 2 I added are sanctioned events that are well know, established, advertised and usually broadcast. One has gone on for 46 years and the other is at least 12 years old. I just not sure what I did wrong.. I did read your sugested page and it is not negative in anyway. I have have put some unnecessary information in with it but not for any reason except to help explain the Championships. The Mackinac is the USA National Stone Skipping Championship and the Pennsylvania one is the State Championship, How would I need to rephrase that to put it in? Thank you Russ Byars — Preceding unsigned comment added by Russbyars (talk • contribs) 23:06, 24 June 2014 (UTC)

I have no objections for your edit

	The Original Barnstar
	good work Siddartha789 (talk) 04:58, 25 June 2014 (UTC)

Thank you Fraggle81 (talk) 12:58, 28 June 2014 (UTC)

I'm sorry if I made a mistake. I'm still new to Wikipedia. IWorkSoMuch (talk) 16:13, 25 June 2014 (UTC)

No worries! It happens to us all, Let me know if you need any help with anything. Thanks Fraggle81 (talk) 12:54, 28 June 2014 (UTC)

You undid my comment re. the Duchess' wearing of the loom bands leading to a spike in sales. While you are right that this was not mentioned in the article I referenced, I shall restore my version and add a second reference^[5] to a BBC business broadcast that supports the statement. Let me know if you still think the statement is not valid, or unproveable. Kpbtm (talk) 08:09, 26 June 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for the message, no problems with your comments as long as they are properly sourced which they now appear to be. Fraggle81 (talk) 12:58, 28 June 2014 (UTC)

Hi,

May I know whats wrong in my changes to medavakkam page.

Thanks, Mahe

Thanks for your help, you have removed all the useful details on the medavakkam page to save the fellow internet surfers to waste time by visiting wikipedia. If that is the case, could you trim down similar pages which could reduce the wikipedia data storage cost by 25% and eventually help 40% of internet surfers from wasting time here.

Depends what you call useful details I suppose. Wikipedia has rules on what is included - what I removed isn't something that should be included here. Maybe some kind of blog would be the appropriate? Maybe people from Medavakkam would like to know about where I am from? Perhaps you could all move here?? I'll start listing everything local to me whether it's relative to the casual user or not just in case you decide so. Fraggle81 (talk) 19:00, 29 June 2014 (UTC)

Hi there

I updated The Mint Chicks page (a NZ band). In "Associated acts" I added "Die! Die! Die!", as the one member (Mike) is currently playing in the band called "Die! Die! Die!". I would appreciate this edit be accepted, as members move between various music groups who like to know.

Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.60.100.68 (talk) 10:23, 1 July 2014 (UTC)

[1] [1]
http://worldconnect.rootsweb.ancestry.com/cgi-bin/igm.cgi?op=PED&db=dowfam3&id=I428696

[2] [2]
http://worldconnect.rootsweb.ancestry.com/cgi-bin/igm.cgi?op=PED&db=lcompagna1&id=I7672

[3] [3]
http://www.geni.com/path/Kyla+Ross+is+related+to+Justin+Bieber?from=6000000017681795450&to=6000000009680146505

[4] [4]
http://www.perche-quebec.com/files/justin/individus/justin-bieber-en.htm

[5] [5]
http://downloads.bbc.co.uk/podcasts/fivelive/money/money_20140625-0618a.mp3

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

Fangirl/Fanboy Edit

A barnstar for you!

Revert on Fallstreak hole

Lily, KY Edit

About Flirtation with Princess Elizabeth in the Thomas Seymour article

Butler Township, Butler County, Pennsylvania

Elie Hobeika

Page blanking

Real truth about Indian Politician

Lee Mack

Lurs

Murphy's law edit

There's no Such thing as Sultan Bla bla bla airport in Balikpapan

Boodles_Company

THDBrill

TheMetaphorer

Message from someone who doesn't understand leave messages at bottom of page (Had to move it #1)

Message from someone who doesn't understand leave messages at bottom of page (Had to move it #2)

Disagree with Link removal

February 2014

A barnstar for you!

Quick question from TheMetaphorer

A barnstar for you!

Women Exist

Elevator

Message

Message

Mike Delph

Message from somewhat delusional IP editor

hello Fraggle, IP address Esaison guy here

&nbsp;???

Discussion needed regarding Liliane Bettencourt scam emails

Plot summary for the 1971 movie "Doc"

Kate Beckinsale

SandS

Boodles (Jewellery)

Rope climbing

Had to prove a point to my friend about the efficiency and reliability of Wikipedia. Thanks for the edit, only took a minute!

Message

Hey, Regarding my edit on Pranked (MTV)

Misinterpreted Edit on List of World War I Video Games

Fuchsia band

Message

Message

WOAY-TV vandalism

Message

Your edit to DOS/360 and successors

re:

Message

Message

message

CP Air 21

Ferryhill

Message

adding hyperbole to the hyperbole article

Page revert change

Emo's

Hi Fraggle

Dear Sir

Second message regarding this subject

Ann-Margaret

sir please read this

Reverts?

Re: Fitzpatrick

May we reconsider?

A kitten for you!

Hugs!

A.K.C. Natrajan

uh

Blitzgiving

Matt Laug page

Re: Edit to Keisuke (puzzle)

Message

Blaenau gwent election results 83 &amp; 87

AIN'T NO OTHER MAN

The Hebrew for Spikenard.

Message

Message

Edit to the planking page

Pixel density

???

Blaenau gwent election results 83 & 87