@JarrahTree: First of all, please don't use that dismissive tone with me. I thought I'd ask at the transport project where there's also editors from interstate who might have an opinion (e.g. on notability), and I know that you and @Steelkamp are based in WA. I'll ask at the WA project to contribute then as well. Fork99 (talk) 01:55, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
well if that is how you feel about it, my apologies... The problem with notability is like the melbourne metropolitan focus of the project is hardly an australian wide understanding - and regional western australian bus service articles have never been a high focus of any editor by looks, which makes it far too easy to dismiss regional services in any state - that said, most Perth metro editors are web based (with a very strong bias to PTA and Metronet), and hardly ever adequately even use Trove let alone regional sources - the https://www.pta.wa.gov.au/our-services/transregional system is probably what you might be thinking of for a central default - I would strongly object to reducing back to that for any great urge to deal the gng on to the bus services however depleted the articles may currently appear, as the actual context and history of the services (like Albany) have not been adequately described in the articles as, if you havent noticed, general editing of Australian content is 'down', and going down... in some cases your finding more items for transport tags in australian articles you may be the only editor to visit those articles in the current state of low editing. Furthermore, the resounding echo chamber of Western Australian and Tasmanian projects (of which I am most familiar) strongly suggests that any identification of problem articles would be to actually encourage actual adding more material rather than applying GNG questions.JarrahTree 02:08, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
@JarrahTree: I'm not suggesting deletion, just simply a merge and/or expansion where possible. I do agree that the 20th century history aspects of buses in each of these places might have been forgotten about - I don't think that the TransRegional articles are the best place for it since the name implies a focus on the current branding name. If the respective operator already has an article or deserves an article, by all means, go for expanding those I think. Fork99 (talk) 02:15, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Supports the closure of public transport options and supports far-right politicians —Preceding unsigned comment added by 27.96.192.133 (talk) 00:48, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for fixing that. My desktop crashed mid-edit, and Firefox recovered what I was working on, but apparently that doesn't include that I was editing a single section. Mackensen(talk) 11:03, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
@Mackensen: haha maybe too many Wikipedia tabs open? :P Fork99 (talk) 22:39, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
thanks for your updating, interesting what escapes tagging. JarrahTree 10:13, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
@JarrahTree: oh yeah definitely, I've just been stumbling upon random articles while reading stuff and then I just check the talk page to see if it's been tagged - then you figure out pretty much an entire category of articles have been forgotten about. Fork99 (talk) 10:20, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
good on you - it is indeed a thankless task, but, in the end it is well worth it! keep reading! JarrahTree 10:29, 24 August 2024 (UTC)