Loading AI tools
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Welcome message | ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
What do you want us to change in the article to keep it?
Well I did not write the article but I was actually going to encylopedize it. I think for now you can delete it until I get time to write a more balanced article that I myself write. The last person just copied and pasted a mission statement which was not appropriate.02:32, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
I've overturned the speedy tag. However, I'm giving you 7 days from this post to come up to get some sources which prove the notablility of this person. Good luck. --wL<speak·check> 09:17, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
Hi! I'm leaving this note on your talk page because you listed yourself on the WikiProject American Football as someone interested in the NFL. Snopes.com reported on the urban legend that Catherine Bell correctly predicted the outcome of Super Bowl XXXVI before the beginning of the season. In fact, she predicted the outcome after the teams for the Super Bowl had been determined. Today, my correction got reverted, and the legend got inserted on the Super Bowl 36 page. I'm not much of a sports fan, but I do have the pages watched. I was hoping I could convince some football fans to watch the Catherine Bell and Super Bowl 36 pages. Are you up for it? Enuja 01:51, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
Yeah, there are lots of list pages on Wikipedia. Nothing wrong with another. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by EragonFragonGragon (talk • contribs) 03:37, 19 March 2007 (UTC). I reread it. There is nothing inappropriate. No porn, no violence, no discrimination.
What is your problem with this username? It appears to be his real life name.--Anthony.bradbury 00:57, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
OK, fair comment, and I will watch him. But as of now I do not see anything that I could reasonably call vandalism. I rather feel that it's just a vanity situation: I accept that I could be wrong. As I say, I will watch.--Anthony.bradbury 01:08, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:CoHun&oldid=121283512 is not vandalism MichaelJE2 22:43, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
We can't really block editors who only have one edit, maybe you could keep an eye on them? TimVickers 01:36, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for reverting my edit to Mudkip . You beat me to the revert. I am experimenting with WikiMonitor and I think that the bugs are still being worked out. That kind of a mix-up wouldn't happen with VP, I think. BTW - what happened to your user page? Do you need any help fixing it? Anyway, thanks again! κaτaʟavenoTC 00:30, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive content to Wikipedia, as you did to Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. A link to the edit that was reverted is here. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Thank you. — Jeff G. 05:57, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
I was about to undo that extra edit that I missed, but you got it before I did. Thank you. Bobo. 02:33, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
Please come join the WikiProject Ice Hockey Notability standards for hockey players discussion. I'd like to see input from all our project members who have an opinion. Thanks! ColtsScore 00:19, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
Seamless Wikipedia browsing. On steroids.
Every time you click a link to Wikipedia, Wiktionary or Wikiquote in your browser's search results, it will show the modern Wikiwand interface.
Wikiwand extension is a five stars, simple, with minimum permission required to keep your browsing private, safe and transparent.