Talk:Zinnia elegans

Copywrite bot (CorenSearchBot) - it is true Floridata was used as the source - and is attributed but it was not copied --Michael Goodyear (talk) 16:53, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

While the source was not copied, it does still closely follow the source throughout, which makes this a derivative work and still a copyright problem. For example, the current version of the article says:

The uncultivated plant is a coarse, bushy, upright plant growing to 30 in (76 cm) in height. It has solitary flowerheads about 2 in (5 cm) across on long stems resembling daisies. Opposite the flowerheads are sandpapery, lanceolate leaves. The petals are purple surrounding a yellow and black disc.

while the source says:

The wild form is a coarse, upright, bushy annual, to 30 in (76 cm) high, with solitary daisylike flowerheads on long stems, and opposite, sandpapery, lance shaped leaves. The ray flowers are purple, the discs yellow and black, and the entire head is about 2 in (5 cm) across.

I have bolded your words which are exactly the same as the source and in the same order. The unbolded words are largely either synonyms or rearranged slightly from the source. Please note that this is only an example, most of the article appears to follow the source too closely.

While facts are not copyrightable, creative elements of presentation - including both structure and language - are. The less creative the expression, the looser copyright applies, but even so close paraphrasing becomes a great concern when there are long passages that include fragments of the original and the structure of the original is retained. The essay Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing contains some suggestions for rewriting that may help avoid these issues. The article Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2009-04-13/Dispatches, while about plagiarism rather than copyright concerns, also contains some suggestions for reusing material from sources that may be helpful, beginning under "Avoiding plagiarism". VernoWhitney (talk) 14:12, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

	This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
Plants Mid‑importance Plants portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Zinnia elegans. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20110714043030/http://www.marthastewart.com/plant/zinnia-elegans-purity to http://www.marthastewart.com/plant/zinnia-elegans-purity

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:47, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

Featured picture scheduled for POTD

Hello! This is to let editors know that File:Zinnienblüte Zinnia elegans stack15 20190722-RM-7222254.jpg, a featured picture used in this article, has been selected as the English Wikipedia's picture of the day (POTD) for December 16, 2021. A preview of the POTD is displayed below and can be edited at Template:POTD/2021-12-16. For the greater benefit of readers, any potential improvements or maintenance that could benefit the quality of this article should be done before its scheduled appearance on the Main Page. If you have any concerns, please place a message at Wikipedia talk:Picture of the day. Thank you! Cwmhiraeth (talk) 11:57, 11 December 2021 (UTC)

Zinnia elegans, known as the youth-and-age, common zinnia or elegant zinnia, is an annual flowering plant in the daisy family, Asteraceae. It is native to Mexico but grown as an ornamental in many places and naturalised in a number of countries, including scattered locations in South and Central America, the West Indies, the United States, Australia and Italy. This photograph of a Z. elegans bloom in a garden in Bamberg, Germany, was stacked from fifteen separate images. Photograph credit: Reinhold Möller Recently featured: Kabukichō Camp: Notes on Fashion Drottningholm Palace Archive More featured pictures