Loading AI tools
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Isotopes of ununquadium's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "00Og01":
Reference named "04Og01":
{{cite journal}}
: Explicit use of et al. in: |author=
(help)I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 14:32, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Isotopes of flerovium. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:13, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
Possibly they are 288Nh and 284Rg? Burzuchius (talk) 11:25, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
With most or all the other artificial elements that have been given official "real" names, rather than temporary "number names" like "ununquadium" ("one-one-four metal"), there's a history of the name. This one should have an explanation too. --Thnidu (talk) 02:17, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
According to , one would expect 295Fl and 297Fl to have half-lives on the order of several days. 129.104.241.214 (talk) 00:25, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
So I heard a bit back that compound nuclei tend to fission by expelling closed shell nuclei (such as 132Sn), so if we made a compound nucleus with Z=196-200ish that would fission by expelling the closed shell 208Pb, we could get 298Fl. This would optimally be done with the 257Fm+257Fm reaction, which would make a compound nucleus with Z=200 and N=314 that would expel 208Pb to make... 306Og, which would quickly expel two alpha particles to make 298Fl. One possible flaw is that the fission could also get rid of several neutrons, however that could still discover new isotopes at the end of the periodic table. I'm also not sure if it'd fission like compound nuclei produced when synthesizing superheavy elements do, but multinucleon transfer could still end up producing cool new isotopes of superheavy elements (such as 271Db) 24.115.255.37 (talk) 02:26, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
Seamless Wikipedia browsing. On steroids.
Every time you click a link to Wikipedia, Wiktionary or Wikiquote in your browser's search results, it will show the modern Wikiwand interface.
Wikiwand extension is a five stars, simple, with minimum permission required to keep your browsing private, safe and transparent.