Systems thinking is a way of making sense of the complexity of the world by looking at it in terms of wholes and relationships rather than by splitting it down into its parts.[1][2] It has been used as a way of exploring and developing effective action in complex contexts,[3] enabling systems change.[4][5] Systems thinking draws on and contributes to systems theory and the system sciences.[6]

Depiction of systems thinking about society

History

Ptolemaic system versus the Copernican system

The term system is polysemic: Robert Hooke (1674) used it in multiple senses, in his System of the World,[7]:p.24 but also in the sense of the Ptolemaic system versus the Copernican system[8]:450 of the relation of the planets to the fixed stars[9] which are cataloged in Hipparchus' and Ptolemy's Star catalog.[10] Hooke's claim was answered in magisterial detail by Newton's (1687) Philosophiæ Naturalis Principia Mathematica, Book three, The System of the World[11]:Book three (that is, the system of the world is a physical system).[7]

Newton's approach, using dynamical systems continues to this day.[8] In brief, Newton's equations (a system of equations) have methods for their solution.

Feedback control systems

Thumb
System output can be controlled with feedback.

By 1824 the Carnot cycle presented an engineering challenge, which was how to maintain the operating temperatures of the hot and cold working fluids of the physical plant.[12] In 1868 James Clerk Maxwell presented a framework for, and a limited solution to the problem of controlling the rotational speed of a physical plant.[13] Maxwell's solution echoed James Watt's (1784) centrifugal moderator (denoted as element Q) for maintaining (but not enforcing) the constant speed of a physical plant (that is, Q represents a moderator, but not a governor, by Maxwell's definition).[14][lower-alpha 1]

Maxwell's approach, which linearized the equations of motion of the system, produced a tractable method of solution.[14]:428–429 Norbert Wiener identified this approach as an influence on his studies of cybernetics[lower-alpha 2] during World War II[14] and Wiener even proposed treating some subsystems under investigation as black boxes.[18]:242 Methods for solutions of the systems of equations then become the subject of study, as in feedback control systems, in stability theory, in constraint satisfaction problems, the unification algorithm, type inference, and so forth.

Applications

"So, how do we change the structure of systems to produce more of what we want and less of that which is undesirable? ... MIT’s Jay Forrester likes to say that the average manager can ... guess with great accuracy where to look for leverage points—places in the system where a small change could lead to a large shift in behavior".[19]:146Donella Meadows, (2008) Thinking In Systems: A Primer p.145 [lower-alpha 3]

Characteristics

Thumb
System boundary in context
Thumb
System input and output allows exchange of energy and information across boundary.

...What is a system? A system is a set of things ... interconnected in such a way that they produce their own pattern of behavior over time. ... But the system’s response to these forces is characteristic of itself, and that response is seldom simple in the real world

Donella Meadows[19]:2

[a system] is "an integrated whole even though composed of diverse, interacting, specialized structures and subjunctions"

IEEE (1972)[17]:582
  • Subsystems serve as part of a larger system, but each comprises a system in its own right. Each frequently can be described reductively, with properties obeying its own laws, such as Newton's System of the World, in which entire planets, stars, and their satellites can be treated, sometimes in a scientific way as dynamical systems, entirely mathematically, as demonstrated by Johannes Kepler's equation (1619) for the orbit of Mars before Newton's Principia appeared in 1687.
  • Black boxes are subsystems whose operation can be characterized by their inputs and outputs, without regard to further detail.[19]:87–88[29]

Particular systems

Systems far from equilibrium

Living systems are resilient,[24] and are far from equilibrium.[19]:Ch.3[40] Homeostasis is the analog to equilibrium, for a living system; the concept was described in 1849, and the term was coined in 1926.[41][42]

Resilient systems are self-organizing;[24][lower-alpha 4][19]:Ch.3 [43]

The scope of functional controls is hierarchical, in a resilient system.[24][19]:Ch.3

Frameworks and methodologies

Frameworks and methodologies for systems thinking include:

See also

Notes

  1. A solution to the equations for a dynamical system can be afflicted by instability or oscillation.[15]:7:33 The Governor: A corrective action against error can solve the dynamical equation by integrating the error.[15]:29:44[16]
  2. "cybernetics: see system science.";[17]:135 "system science: —the systematized knowledge of systems"[17]:583
  3. Donella Meadows, Thinking In Systems: A Primer[19][20] Overview, in video clips: Chapter 1[21] Chapter 2, part 1[22] Chapter 2, part 2[23] Chapter 3[24] Chapter 4[25] Chapter 5[26] Chapter 6[27] Chapter 7[28]

References

Wikiwand in your browser!

Seamless Wikipedia browsing. On steroids.

Every time you click a link to Wikipedia, Wiktionary or Wikiquote in your browser's search results, it will show the modern Wikiwand interface.

Wikiwand extension is a five stars, simple, with minimum permission required to keep your browsing private, safe and transparent.