Self-Defence of the Republic of Poland

The Self-Defence of the Republic of Poland (Polish: Samoobrona Rzeczpospolitej Polskiej,^[57] SRP) is a socialist,^{[20][21][58][59]} populist,^[60][61][62] agrarian,^[63][64] and nationalist^[65] political party and trade union in Poland. The party promotes agrarian socialist and Catholic socialist^[66] economic policies combined with a left-wing populist, anti-globalization and anti-neoliberal rhetoric.^[20] The party describes itself as left-wing, although it stresses that it belongs to the "patriotic left" and follows Catholic social teaching.^[31] The party is sympathetic to Communist Poland, which led political scientists to label the party as neocommunist,^[4] post-communist,^[44][67] and far-left.^[68]

Self-Defence of the Republic of Poland Polish: Samoobrona Rzeczpospolitej Polskiej
Abbreviation	SRP[1]
Leader	Krzysztof Prokopczyk
Founder	Andrzej Lepper
Founded	27 July 1991 (trade union)[2] 10 January 1992 (party)[3]
Registered	10 January 1992 (trade union)[3] 12 June 1992 (party)[4]
Headquarters	Aleje Jerozolimskie 30, 00-024 Warsaw
Youth wing	OMOS RP[5]
Membership (2012)	100,000 (party)[6] 500,000 (trade union)[7]
Ideology	Agrarian socialism[8] Catholic socialism[9] Catholic left[10] Environmentalism[11] Anti-neoliberalism[12] Anti-globalization[13] Left-wing populism[14] Left-wing nationalism[15]
Political position	Left-wing[nb 1] to far-left[nb 2]
Religion	Roman Catholic[48]
National affiliation	Social Alliance (1998) Liga i Samoobrona (2007)
Colours	Yellow   Blue   Green[nb 3]
Slogan	We choose red and white[52] Polish: Wybieramy biało-czerwonych
Anthem	This country is ours and yours[53] Polish: Ten kraj jest nasz i wasz
European parliamentary group	Non-Inscrits PES Group (2004–2009) UEN Group (2004–2009) EUD Group (2005–2009)
Sejm	0 / 460
Senate	0 / 100
European Parliament	0 / 51
Regional assemblies	0 / 552
City presidents	0 / 117
Website
https://samoobronarp.org/ (party) http://samoobrona.net.pl/ (trade union)
Politics of Poland Political parties Elections New logo of the party, adopted in 2009.[54][55][56]

Though considered a "political chameleon",^[21] Self-Defence of the Republic of Poland is generally regarded as a left-wing party by historians and political scientists.^[69] According to Andrzej Antoszewski, Self-Defence was a radical left-wing party that by postulating the need to stop privatisation and protect workers' interests, often overlapped with neo-communist parties.^[70] In English-language literature, the party is described as a radical left-populist party. In the wake of the SLD's electoral defeat in 2005, Self-Defence was sometimes referred to as the "new left".^[71] It was also called a left-wing party with a populist-agrarian face.^[72] Political scientists also described it as socialist, allowing it to form alliances with the Democratic Left Alliance. On the other hand, its anti-neoliberal and nationalist narrative also allowed it to briefly cooperate with PiS and LPR in 2005.^[73]

Founded by Andrzej Lepper in 1992, the party initially fared poorly, failing to enter the Sejm. However, it was catapulted to prominence in the 2001 parliamentary election, winning 53 seats, after which it gave confidence and supply to the Democratic Left Alliance government. It elected six MEPs at the 2004 European election, with five joining the Union for Europe of the Nations and one joining the PES Group.

It switched its support to Law and Justice (PiS) after the 2005 election, in which it won 56 seats in the Sejm and three in the Senate. Lepper was appointed Deputy Prime Minister in the coalition government with PiS and the League of Polish Families. In 2007, he was dismissed from his position and the party withdrew from the coalition. This precipitated a new election, at which the party collapsed to just 1.5% of the vote: losing all its seats. On August 5, 2011, the Party's leader, Andrzej Lepper, was found dead in his party's office in Warsaw. His death was ruled a suicide by hanging.

History

Beginnings

The origins of Samoobrona date back to a spontaneous protest movement of farmers from Western Pomerania (the Darlowo area is the hometown of A. Lepper) and the Zamojszczyzna region, which developed into a trade union. The very creation of the political party was originally aimed solely at supporting the 'Samoobrona' Trade Union of Agriculture (ZZR 'Samoobrona'), which had played a leading role for a long time.^[4] Samoobrona as a movement had communist origins,^[74] and it originally was a peasant movement associated with the Polish People's Party,^[75] which back then was an agrarian socialist party^[76] associated with the fallen communist regime, and was considered one of the post-communist successor parties based on the nostalgia for the previous, socialist regime.^[77]

As Lepper reported many years later. Lepper, the idea to create a trade union, and then a political movement, was born after a meeting with Deputy Prime Minister Leszek Balcerowicz in the autumn of 1991: "Everything that happened afterwards - with me and Samoobrona - I therefore owe, to some extent, to that two hours long conversation of 10 years ago".^[4] In January 1992, the Trade Union of Agriculture "Samoobrona" was registered. The political party, which initially appeared under the name Przymierze "Samoobrona", was registered on 12 June 1992. In addition to representatives of ZZR "Samoobrona", it also included activists from the Metalworkers' Trade Union and a Green faction headed by J. Bryczkowski.^[4] In its first political declaration, Samoobrona described itself as a "radical" party that represents the interests of the economically disadvantaged and those living in poverty.^[78]

The beginnings of Samoobrona activity date to Lepper's home village Darłowo, which has been plunged into poverty between 1989 and 1991 as a result of the neoliberal Balcerowicz Plan, which dismantled the socialist economy in Poland in favor of a capitalist free-market one. As the state sector of agricultures was dismantled and privatized, rural areas experienced an extreme spike of unemployment, poverty and social exclusion. Unfavourable prices of agricultural products on the market further aggravated the situation - between 1990 and 1991, agricultural prices increased threefold while industrial prices increased tenfold, drastically diminishing the purchasing power of Polish agriculture. This was combined with a huge decrease in farmers' real income. In Lepper's region, the situation became particularly critical as a result of heavy rainfall, which caused local flooding.^[2]

On 18 January 1991, the first rally was organised in Darłowo, attended by local farmers and the unemployed, including Andrzej Lepper. During the rally, protesters formed the Self-Defence of the Unemployed Homeless Association of the Pomeranian Region Darłowo (Polish: Stowarzyszenie Samoobrona Bezrobotnych Bezdomnych Regionu Pomorskiego Darłowo). Samoobrona itself was then founded on 27 July 1991 as a trade union Protest Committee of Self-Defence of Farmers (Polish: Komitet Protestacyjny Samoobrony Rolników), with Lepper being elected as its leader. First protest initiated by Lepper then took place on 5 August 1991, which demanded that the state of natural disaster be declared in Darłowo, along with demanding special aid and compensation to affected farmers. Lepper also made an appeal to the local voivode that the government temporarily suspends the enforcement of unpaid debts on local citizens. His plea was ignored.^[2]

In front of the Darlowo town hall on 24 September, farmers put up unpaid agricultural equipment, having fallen into a spiral of debt due to the introduction of variable interest rates as part of the implementation of Balcerowicz's reform plan. Striking farmers announced the formation of the Farmers' Self-Defence Committee (Polish: Komitet Samoobrony Rolników). The blockade of Darłowo with agricultural machinery attracted press attention, and over a period of two months, the communal protest committee evolved into the "Provincial Self-Defence Committee" (Polish: Wojewódzki Komitet Samoobrony) of farmers in Koszalin with its headquarters in Darłowo.^[2] The farmers' protests were then supported by the Polish People's Party and the Independent Self-Governing Trade Union "Solidarity" of Individual Farmers (Polish: Niezależny Samorządny Związek Zawodowy „Solidarność” Rolników Indywidualnych). On 18 October 1991, A. Lepper headed the Farmers' Defence Committee established in Warsaw, which coordinated the protest of trade unionists in front of the Sejm building. The subsequent speeches were increasingly radical in nature; they were supported by a militant organisation created by the farmers called the Peasant Guard and groups of radical subcultural youth. On 14 November, an agreement was concluded between the protesters and the government, which provided for the suspension of bailiffs' executions threatening farmers and the establishment of a special Fund and the Restructuring and Debt Relief of Agriculture.^[79]

During the intense protests, Lepper made the first attempt in his political activity to participate in electoral competition. The electoral law for the Sejm and Senate, in force in 1991, allowed committees to register in only one electoral district, thus leading to an extreme fragmentation of the party system. However, the run in the 1991 Polish parliamentary election was unsuccessful - something that Lepper attributed to lack of his direct participation in the campaign. The list of the Provincial Farmers' Self-Defence Committee (Polish: Wojewódzki Komitet Samoobrony Rolników) opened by the party's leader received only 3,247 votes in constituency number 21, covering the then Koszalin and Słupsk voivodeships.^[80] Registered in only one of 37 constituencies, the 3,247 votes won by the committee amounted to 0.03% of the nationwide popular vote. With Lepper being on top of the electoral list, other two candidates of the committee were Leszek Siudek and Józef Kołodziej.^[81] Lepper presented his committee as "farmers' social movement emerged on the basis of farmers' disconent".^[82] Already in the program of the committee, Lepper appealed to populist policies and ideologies that would then shape Samoobrona - the tradition of the interwar peasant movement, Catholic social teaching, nationalism, and "real socialism" (the socialism of Polish People's Republic). While unsuccessful, the electoral run spread the message of Samoobrona to a wider audience, and it was soon able to form associations with farmer movements across Poland.^[83]

Three months later, the second wave of farmer protests then emerged, with greater intensity than the protests of 1991. Already functioning as the National Council of the Trade Union "Self-Defense", Samoobrona delivered a new ultimatum to the government in early 1992, including the clearing of farm debts and a program of "cheap" credit for farmers, with cheap defined as credits with an interest rate below the inflation level, which amounted to 40% in 1992. After the demands were ignored, Samoobrona was joined in with other trade unions and farmer associations in aummer 1992, organizing nationwide farmer protests that soon turned radical and even violent, earning Samoobrona its reputation as a radical formation. Samoobrona then started defining its ideological character, stating the need for farmers to stand against "the dictatorship of the International Monetary Fund" and arguing: "Under communism, the Soviets ordered us Poles what to do, and now this dictatorship position has been taken over by international capitalism." Samoobrona extended its debt clearance demands to non-agricultural parts of the economy, and on 10 July, the protests reached its climax when farmers organizing a march in Warsaw, where the protesters clashed with anti-riot police deployed by the government.^[82]

Andrzej Lepper's Self-Defence Party (Samoobrona) emerged in the early 1990s as a local protest movement of farmers caught in a debt trap with rapidly rising interest rates. As the movement expanded beyond its original local base in the north-western region of Poland as a result of high-profile violent protests in Warsaw, it became an actor beyond regional politics. While new regional offshoots emerged, Self-Defence was also involved in attempts to build a viable national protest movement. Its main allies in these ultimately futile efforts were extreme nationalist groups such as the Stronnictwo Narodowe „Ojczyzna”. Their joint demonstration in Warsaw on 2 April 1993, for example, turned violent and led to clashes with the police.^[84]

Agrarian protests of Samoobrona were attracting widespread media attention as well as popularity, and in April 1992 Lepper founded special paramilitary group of farmers called "Peasant Battalions" (Polish: Bataliony Chłopskie), referring to a Polish agrarian WW2-era resistance movement of the same name. Samoobrona's Peasant Battalions were to protect farmers against the bailiffs and evictions; after founding the group, Lepper stated: "We will strengthen physical fortitude, develop patriotism and train our military troops. We don't want war, but we have a lawless state, so we will fight the state offices - bailiffs, banks, tax offices - with weapons in hand. We are a radical party, open to all disadvantaged people who are starving at home."^[85] The "Peasant Battalions" successfully harassed bailiffs, even reportedly shaving their heads and battering them.^[86] The party was accused by media of planning a revolution against the government, to which Lepper provocatively responded by stating his plans to expand the Samoobrona coalition with pensioners and unemployed. Incendiary comments of Samoobrona members such as "If someone has a billion or two or ten, they really couldn't have made it through legal work" became widely reported and known.^[85]

The emergence of Self-Defence as an organised political group was somewhat clouded by the alleged active involvement of former members of the communist security services who acted as advisers or activists, especially in the early days. In this context, the involvement of Soviet and Russian intelligence was also alleged. This led to calls for a parliamentary enquiry into the origins of the party and possibly its hidden agendas. One of the most striking features of Self-Defence was undoubtedly its clear longing for the former regime, which was identified with social stability and prosperity.^[87]

Samoobrona repeated slogans about the corruption of power, disregard for peasants and workers, accused the government of stealing Polish land and property and selling it to international capitalists, while Lepper also spoke of Poles starving in small towns and villages - pensioners, the unemployed, farmers. He demanded the departure of every successive government, especially ministers of agriculture. Some political commentators asserted that Lepper's actions were radicalising and argued that the party should be banned because of the criminal cases pending against the Samoobrona trade union: concerning, among other things, the occupation of state administration buildings and blockades of public roads, preventing government officials from carrying out their legal duties, the use of blackmail and intimidation against bank and court officials, and the seizure of private property.^[88]

Lepper consistently dominated the headlines by organising spectacular protests, such as the one outside the Sejm on 19 February 1993, when farmers set up 19 large scythes and one small one - as a "lady scythe" that was intended for Prime Minister Hanna Suchocka. By this time, Lepper was emerging not only as a defender of farmers, but also of all those disadvantaged by the new system. Samoobrona appeared wherever there were protests or bailiffs tried to enforce court rulings. Media widely reported on Samoobrona preventing the sale of a state farm in Główczyce and the "battle of the Sejm", when more than a thousand Samoobrona members turned up with banners "Poland for Poles" and "We will not be a feeding ground for any party", sparking clashes with the police and causing several dozen people, including Andrzej Lepper to be detained. A few months aftwards, several thousand farmers from the "Solidarity" of Individual Farmers, Farmers' Circles and Samoobrona demonstrated in front of the government seat in Warsaw, throwing sacks of straw to symbolise poverty in the countryside. Finally, the mayor of Praszka, Włodzimierz Skoczek, was taken away in a wheelbarrow (which became Samoobrona's speciality in the fight against officials) after refusing to sign the resignation submitted to him.^[89]

The leaders of the party frequently got into legal clashes and confrontations with the police and the judiciary because of their unruly protests. A joke became popular among Polish youth: "I wish you as much luck as the number of convictions of Lepper". At the same time, they were also invited to negotiations by the country's leaders. Self-Defence used its formal dual status as a party and a trade union, which allowed it to put on whatever hat was appropriate at the time. In the late 1990s, Lepper reportedly maintained a particularly close relationship with Artur Balazs, an agriculture minister who led the liberal-conservative Conservative People's Party, which was part of the ruling AWS. Over the years, Balazs and Lepper together built up an extensive network of patronage in the state agricultural authorities. Balazs again served as a bridge between Lepper and the conservative right in 2005.^[90]

In the government

The party first started in parliamentary elections in 1993, gaining 2.78% votes and failing to enter the Sejm. It also took part in the 1994 local elections, where it did not play a significant role as party structures were not yet ready for an electoral campaign and were often in the preliminary state of organisation. The party won over 1.3% of the popular vote.^[91] The 1994 local elections are largely undocumented and were greatly affected by the lack of interest in Polish society, which translated into a very low turnout (33%). Samoobrona along with the Polish Socialist Party avoided forming local coalitions in the election.^[92] In the 1995 elections Andrzej Lepper ran for president and gained 1.32% of the votes; in parliamentary elections in 1997, the party took 0.08%. In 2000 Samoobrona organized a campaign of blocking major roads in order to get media attention. Lepper gained 3.05% votes in the presidential elections.

For the 1998 Polish local elections, Samoobrona founded the Social Alliance (Polish: Przymierze Społeczne) together with Labour Union (UP), Polish People's Party (PSL) and the National Party of Retirees and Pensioners (KPEiR). The coalition was mostly focused on protesting austerity and neoliberalism, which aligned perfectly with the main focus of Samoobrona. The coalition aimed to challenge the political dichotomy between post-communist SLD and anti-communist AWS, and was polling well. The coalition had internal conflicts however, as some wings of the PSL were concerned with the radical, far-left character of Samoobrona, whereas Labor Union protested Samoobrona's opposition to the European Union.^[93] Nevertheless, the coalition performed well and won 89 seats.^[94]

Social Alliance was an unprecedented case of the PSL working together with much more radical Self-Defence, and there was speculation at the time about the possibility of a permanent alliance being formed on its basis, which in the long term could lead to the full unification of political structures representing Polish farmers and the rural population. However, this proposal failed as both parties started strongly competing with each other. In this situation, cooperation was limited to undertaking successive joint initiatives aimed at bringing together and working out common positions by the three largest agricultural trade unions; in June 1998 it was agreed that ZZR "Samoobrona" together with KZRKiOR and NSZZ "Solidarność" RI would work out a common position on the terms of Poland's accession to the European Union.^[95]

The coalition also contributed to Samoobrona's rise to relevance. Shortly before the 2001 Polish parliamentary election, there emerged a project of a "Workers' and Peasants' Alliance" (Polish: Sojusz Robotniczo-Chłopski, SRC) combining Samoobrona and the Polish Socialist Party of Piotr Ikonowicz. More significantly, Samoobrona then gained informal support from the SLD, keen to weaken the PSL, which allowed Samoobrona to play the role of an informal SLD coalition partner in the Sejm and, after the 2002 local elections, also in the provincial assemblies. Although Lepper continued to lavish criticism on SLD politicians, he distinguished the liberal wing associated with Kwasniewski from the democratic socialist group headed by Miller and Oleksy. This allowed Samoobrona to attract a sizable group of left-wing activists, both at the central and local level. After 2001, Lepper went as far as announcing that Samoobrona would become the only party of the socialist left in Poland.^[96]

At the end of January/beginning of February 1999, the whole of Poland was paralysed by road blockades and border crossings organised by farmers supporting the party. In addition to an increase in the purchase price of pork livestock, they demanded extensive government intervention in the cereal, meat and milk markets. The agreement concluded with the government on 8 February 1999 only emboldened the head of Samoobrona to further excesses. In June 1999, on the radio in Łódź, Andrzej Lepper called the then government "an anti-Polish and anti-human regime" and Deputy Prime Minister Tomaszewski "a bandit from Pabianice". The prosecution proceedings initiated in this case ended in a failure after less than a year: when Lepper was returning from a trade union congress in India, he was spectacularly arrested after crossing the border in Kudowa (4 April 2000) and then released after three hours.^[27]

In February 2001, Samoobrona entered coalition negotiations with the Polish Socialist Party.^[97] The aforementioned "Workers' and Peasants' Alliance" was to be a 'radical socialist' coalition between Samoobrona, PPS and the National Party of Retirees and Pensioners. PPS's leader Piotr Ikonowicz announced that cooperation with Samoobrona would extend beyond the election campaign, and that all three parties would closely work together to fight capitalist economic reforms. The main concept behind the socialist coalition was almost identical to Samoobrona's goal as a political party - to represent social groups that had been hurt by the capitalist transformation in Poland, which Ikonowicz listed as farmers, workers, pensioners, and students.^[98] Samoobrona was very supportive of a joint run with the PPS, and the party already cooperated with the socialist party in the 2000 Polish presidential election, when Samoobrona activists helped collect signatures for the PPS candidate, Piotr Ikonowicz. Lepper proposed PPS first 30 seats on the electoral lists and a possibility to form two separate parliamentary clubs in the Sejm. However, ultimately the Samoobrona-PPS-KPEiR coaliiton did not materialize because of the opposition of the PPS leadership, which considered Samoobrona an inappropriate political partner. After Samoobrona's spectacular performance in the 2001 election, numerous prominent PPS activists defected to it.^[99]

The parliamentary elections in 2001 gave the party 53 seats in the Sejm, with 10.5% support, making it the third largest political force. In September 2001, the winner of the election, the social democratic Democratic Left Alliance (SLD), was looking for a coalition partner in order to form a working majority. Because of its left-wing and pro-communist profile, Samoobrona was considered and the SLD leadership almost made the government offer, but eventually the party settled with its old coalition partner instead - Polish People's Party.^[77] Although officially a member of the opposition, Samoobrona backed the ruling social democratic Democratic Left Alliance in a number of key votes, giving them the majority needed to stay in power. The party has also marked its presence in the Sejm by unconventional disruptive behavior.

The 2001 election was a huge trump for the party, which unexpectedly became the third political force in Poland. The support for Lepper's organisation in the Koszaliński district reached 23%; over 15% was recorded in the Sieradz, Chełm and Piotrków districts. Samoobrona still had weak support in big cities: in Warsaw it received 3%, in the Poznań district 5%, and in the districts of Gdańsk, Gliwice and Katowice - 6% each. The campaign itself was characterised by a much calmer tone and much less aggression. A breakthrough in the ratings of the Lepper movement occurred at the beginning of September, when it reached a borderline 4-5% support in polls, which jumped to 8-9% after just a few weeks.^[27]

Lepper achieved only 3 percent nationwide among voters with a university degree and only 8 percent among voters with a high school diploma, even though the majority of students trusted him, according to surveys. Surprisingly, 9.4 percent of the self-employed voters - i.e. those doing private business - voted for Samoobrona, most of them being small entrepreneurs who feared economic competition in the event of Poland joining the EU. Overall, Lepper was elected by eleven percent of male and seven percent of female voters. He received eight per cent of the votes from voters aged 18 to 24, ten per cent from 25 to 59 and seven per cent from voters over 60. Samoobrona received 16 per cent of the vote in rural areas, eight per cent in towns with up to 50,000 inhabitants, seven per cent in towns between 50,000 and 200,000 and five per cent in towns with over 200,000 inhabitants. Samoobrona was particularly popular after the 2001 election - the survey conducted for "Rzeczpospolita" showed that in March 2002, 11 percent of Poles supported Samoobrona. In May 2002, 17 percent of Poles wanted the party to take power. The analyses of the Pentor Institute show that in April 2002, 18 percent of those questioned, i.e. almost one in five Poles, supported Samoobrona. From January to May 2002, the party's acceptance and popularity rose considerably from 9 to 17 per cent.^[100]

Despite the Democratic Left Alliance (SLD) ultimately deciding against choosing Samoobrona as its coalition partner, Samoobrona initially supported the SLD-PSL government and entered a confidence and supply agreement with it. The SLD also nominated Genowefa Wiśniowska, a member of Samoobrona, as the chair of the Parliamentary Committee on National and Ethnic Minorities. This nomination initially faced backlash because of the radical image of Samoobrona, but after a few weeks Polish media acknowledged that Polish minority groups reported no bias in the committee's work. This improved the image of Samoobrona and downplayed its nationalist reputation.^[101] Lepper continued to soften the image of his party in regards to national minorities, and visited the Belarusian Socio-Cultural Association in Białystok where he pledged to allocate additional funds to the Belarusian minority in Poland. He argued that "the development of Belarusian culture in Poland is under threat; in the absence of adequate funding, it has no chance of survival."^[102] Samoobrona also had a notably high support amongst the Ukrainian minority in Poland, consistently winning the municipalities in West Pomeranian Voivodeship and Warmian–Masurian Voivodeship where Ukrainians constituted a significant minority or plurality.^[103] Samoobrona also spoke for regulation that would allow for easy legal employment of Ukrainian workers in Poland, as well as allow Ukrainian citizens to not require a work permit at all for temporary and seasonal jobs.^[104]

Both parties also worked with each other on local levels, and formed coalitions in voivodeship sejmiks. Local leaders emphasized the left-wing outlook of both parties. Samoobrona also hoped to persuade the SLD to soften its pro-European stance, especially on the issue of European integration.^[105] In 2003, SLD also supported Andrzej Lepper's candidacy for the parliamentary inquiry committee regarding the Rywin affair; SLD explained that "Samoobrona was, is and will probably remain the SLD's main de facto ally and this is no surprise." Surprisingly, Lepper was also supported by the far-right and anti-capitalist League of Polish Families.^[106]

However, later in 2003, Samoobrona rebelled against the SLD and broke both the local coalitions as well as the confidence and supply agreement in the Sejm. Lepper stated that the "SLD presented a different program before the elections, after the elections it started to implement a different program, and today practically nothing remains of both the first one and the other one."^[107] Samoobrona accused SLD of betraying its social-democratic principles and did not turn the tide after the previous neoliberal government, continuing austerity and privatization reforms instead. The party also pointed out to the fact that the SLD responded to farmer protests with police forces and suppression, instead of trying to improve the agrarian situation in Poland; Lepper listed "the arrogance of the SLD, the disregard of Samoobrona's program objectives and the brutality of the government towards the protesters" as the main reasons for his hostility towards SLD.^[108] In its declaration of terminating the agreement with SLD, Samoobrona leadership in Łódź wrote that it could never work with a party responsible for breaking up farmers' protests.^[109] The SLD-PSL government fell shortly after, as the PSL left the coalition after the minister of economy, Jacek Piechota from SLD, abolished custom duties on some food products; PSL and Samoobrona decried this decision as "the nail in the coffin for farmers". SLD then entered a new coalition with the pro-European Labour Union that lasted until 2004.^[110]

The involvement of Piotr Tymochowicz's professional image creation company resulted, among other things, in a more attractive appearance for Andrzej Lepper (a solarium tan to mask blushing in moments of nervousness, well-tailored suits). He was also given lessons in rhetoric, eristic and retorting, and his tone of voice was lowered. The Self-Defence candidates appeared in the media wearing distinctive white and red ties, which not only made political identification easier for the voters, but also encouraged them to perceive the party as a strong and cohesive patriotic team. According to contemporary newspapers, election spots of the Lepper movement were also among the best presented in the campaign by all parties.^[27]

Among their numerous exploits there are such diverse incidents as using their own loudspeakers after being cut off for exceeding the permitted time, or claiming that the largest opposition party (Civic Platform) met with members of the Taliban in Klewki (a village near Olsztyn) to sell them anthrax.^[111] Several Samoobrona members of parliament were subject to criminal investigations on charges ranging from forgery to banditry.

In the 2005 elections, Samoobrona received a total of 56 seats with 11.4% support. Andrzej Lepper ran for president of Poland in the 2005 election. He received third place and 15% of the vote, a great improvement over his past performances. After the elections, Samoobrona temporarily shelved its most radical demands and along with the League of Polish Families entered into a coalition with the center-right Law and Justice party.

Despite being a part of a right-wing government, the party doubled down on its left-wing rhetoric. Jarosław Tomasiewicz wrote: "This joint front with the right, however, did not mean a turn of the SRP to the right. On the contrary, Lepper's plan was for Samoobrona to take over the hegemony on the left".^[40] On the next party convention, Lepper stated: "I set myself the aim to convince the electorate of the left in such a way that they understand that the only left-wing, pro-social and patriotic party is currently Samoobrona".^[40]

To this end, the party started cooperating with minor left-wing parties such as the Democratic Left Party, the Working People's Movement and the National Party of Retirees and Pensioners. The ranks of Self-Defence included activists from the Democratic Left Alliance (e.g. Grzegorz Tuderek, Bolesław Borysiuk) and the Labour Union (Andrzej Aumiller). To a large extent, Lepper's plan succeeded - while right-leaning voters defected to the League of Polish Families, this was compensated by further gains amongst left-wing voters - mainly pensioners, workers of bankrupt workplaces and former officers of the uniformed services.^[40]

According to contemporary polls, Self-Defence overtook Democratic Left Alliance in terms of popularity. Contemporary commentators speculated that Self-Defence might emerge as the new main left-wing party in Poland.^[37] Parallel to its parliamentary activity, the SRP tried to be active in the social sphere. The party started to cooperate with organisations of disabled people (even appointing a special plenipotentiary for contacts with them) and the circles of single mothers. Commenting on the developments in Poland, Bulgarian political scientist Maria Spirova argued that Samoobrona is a serious contender for becoming the "successor party" of the Polish United Workers' Party and the main representative of the Polish left:

The SdRP established itself for over a decade as a virtual monopolist in two ways: as a successor party to the communist PZPR and as a voice of the broadly understood Polish Left (united under the Democratic Left Alliance umbrella). The so far only serious challenge to these functions came after the turn of the century from the Self-Defense (Samoobrona), a radical populist party.^[112]

However, scandals that rocked the party made its popularity collapse.^[40] In December 2006, a scandal broke out when Aneta Krawczyk, a local party ex-leader accused Samoobrona leaders, notably Andrzej Lepper and Stanisław Łyżwiński of sexual harassment.^[113] Subsequently, the accusation was supported by other females from within the party ranks and the issue of gaining governmental posts in exchange for sex produced a major outcry after Gazeta Wyborcza published the claims. Krawczyk also claimed her then 3-year-old daughter was Stanisław Łyżwiński's child, which proved to be incorrect following DNA testing.

The criminal trial in this case began in 2008 before the District Court of District Court in Piotrków Trybunalski, which in February 2010 sentenced Lepper to two years and three months' imprisonment and Łyżwiński to five years of imprisonment. Both have maintained that they were innocent. In March 2011, the Court of Appeal in Łódź overturned the verdict against Lepper in the sex affair and referred the case for retrial by the Regional Court. Afterwards, Aneta Krawczyk filed a court accusation that Lepper was the father of her youngest child. However, an examination of his DNA ruled out this allegation. These events caused not only politicians, but also the public public condemned the Samoobrona activists. It lost a part of its electorate. Lepper almost disappeared from the media. Rarely invited to interviews, he generally focused on criticising the right-wing Law and Justice party.^[114]

At the beginning of July 2007, then Prime Minister Jarosław Kaczyński named Lepper as a person in the circle of suspicion in connection with the so-called "land affair". This concerned a CBA (Central Anti-Corruption Bureau) operation concerning the controlled payment of bribes to two people accused of citing influence in the Ministry of Agriculture. They offered a substituted CBA agent, for a bribe, the de-agglomeration of land in Muntów in the municipality of Mrągowo. The operation ended inconsistently with the CBA's plan, because - as the prosecution initially assumed - Lepper had been warned about the action and cancelled the meetings. However, at the request of Prime Minister Jarosław Kaczyński, President Lech Kaczyński dismissed Lepper from the post of Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Agriculture. This decision marked the end of the coalition.^[114]

As the sting operation against Lepper failed, it sparked an outrage. It was questioned whether the operation was ordered by Kaczyński himself, or if it initiated by the Polish secret services on their own volition. Some experts, such as the Lithuanian sociologist Zenonas Norkus, assert that the operation was a political move by Jarosław Kaczyński, who already planned to end the coalition and needed a reason that implicating Lepper in bribery activities would give him. The operation also compromised the entire cabinet of Kaczyński, as his Minister of Interior, Janusz Kaczmarek, was arrested and accused of leaking information on the sting operation to Lepper.^[115] Ultimately the investigation against Kaczmarek was dropped in 2009, putting into question whether Lepper was warned beforehand at all, or if he cancelled the meetings for other reason.^[116]

The party's position towards the scandal was that it was a "coup attempt", as the presence of Samoobrona in the government supposedly thratened powerful "interest groups", including corporations controlling large-format shops, investment fund owners, land speculators and property development groups. Lepper also argued that the scandals and investigations started against him were aimed at eliminating competition for Lech Kaczyński for future presidential elections.^[117] After unsuccessful attempts of Law and Justice to convince some of the Samoobrona MPs to defect, the PiS-Samoobrona-LPR coalition was officially dissolved on 5 August 2007. Reasons cited were ideological differences between PiS and Samoobrona on fundamental levels.^[118]

Downfall

Following the collapse of the ruling coalition, a proposal of a joint front between Samoobrona and right-wing League of Polish Families was born, known as League and Self-Defence (Polish: Liga i Samoobrona). The Polish abbreviation for this party was LiS ("fox" in Polish), and leaders of both parties brought a plush fox to the press conference, which was shown as the mascot of the new party.^[119] However, despite their populist character, LPR and Samoobrona were fundamentally different from each other, as Samoobrona was left-wing and aligned with socialist ideals, while LPR was a National-Catholic, far-right party. Andrzej Lepper himself admitted that the alliance was a bad idea, and argued that the alliance was purely situation and tactical in nature.^[118]

The idea was highly unpopular amongst Samoobrona supporters, as a majority of them identified as left-wing^[46] and desired a return to a socialist economy.^[45] A chunk of the Catholic socialist wing of the party known as Social Movement seceded to form a new party called Self-Defence Social Movement (Polish: Samoobrona Ruch Społeczny), which then became Self-Defence Rebirth.^[120]

The idea of the LiS party was then soon abandoned, and the party doubled down on its left-wing rhetoric, inviting Leszek Miller and the leader of the New Left, Piotr Ikonowicz, to its electoral lists. Despite this, numerous scandals heavily damaged the image of the party, while forming a government with right-wing parties and the LiS caused distrust among the party's overwhelmingly left-wing electorate.^[29] As a result, the party gained less than 2% of the popular vote in the 2007 Polish parliamentary election, failing to win any seats and being excluded from government funding.^[121]

The last bill proposed by Samoobrona before losing all of its seats in the 2007 election was a proposal from 7 September 2007 to recognize the Silesian language as a regional language of Poland. Along with the MPs of Samoobrona, the bill was also supported by the members of LPR, People's National Movement and the Polish People's Party.^[122] However, the Sejm was dissolved on the same day, prompting a snap election.^[123] The bill was therefore rejected. After 17 years, the Sejm voted in favor of a bill recognizing Silesian as a regional language in Poland on 26 April 2024.^[124] However, on 29 May 2024, the President Andrzej Duda vetoed the bill, claiming that Silesian is not a language and does not deserve its own status.^[125]

In November 2007, the regionalist wing of the party seceded and formed Party of Regions, further weakening local structures of the party. Lepper accepted responsibility for the party's electoral defeat and announced an extraordinary congress of Self-Defence in the first half of 2008. Lepper also announced that he did not intend to challenge or clash with the Party of Regions. In party congress, Lepper stressed that Samoobrona's goals from the time when it was a classic protest party, such as the reversal of privatisation processes, had not been realised and were still a political task for the party.^[126]

The party also reestablished its reputation as an unequivocally left-wing party.^[127] Talks were initiated with the Polish Socialist Party led by Piotr Ikonowicz and the democratic-socialist National Party of Retirees and Pensioners, proposing to establish "a worker–peasant alliance".^[128] There was also an attempt to establish a new party that would represent socialist left, with a view to prepare for the 2009 European Parliament election in Poland. However, the party went bankrupt by the end of 2007 as it was unable to pay for its 2007 electoral campaign. The party was also unable to cover its bills, and electricity and the alarm system were disconnected from the party headquarters. Lepper founded a new party known as "Self-Defence" (as opposed to "Self-Defence of the Republic of Poland") in 2010, which sustained itself solely on membership fees and had no commitments.^[129]

In 2009, as the two-party system of right-wing populist Law and Justice and centre-right neoliberal Civic Platform started consolidating itself, Samoobrona entered an "anti-neoliberal" media pact together with Law and Justice and Democratic Left Alliance. Informally known as the "media coalition", the pact was based on filling the managerial positions in Telewizja Polska (TVP) (Polish state media) with PiS-aligned persons that would exclude Samoobrona and Democratic Left Alliance from criticism and attacks in favour of focusing solely on the rising Civic Platform. On 29 July 2009, four out of five members of the National Broadcasting Council: Barbara Babula (recommended by Law and Justice), Piotr Boroń (representing President Lech Kaczyński), Tomasz Borysiuk (recommended by Samoobrona), Witold Kołodziejski (recommended by Law and Justice), elected the Supervisory Board of Telewizja Polska, which included people associated with the three parties of the "media coalition". All three heads of Telewizja Polska (Szwedo, Szatkowski, Orzeł) were associated with the Law and Justice party - the informal arrangement assumed that the position of TVP president went to PiS, and of two vice-presidents - to Samoobrona and Democratic Left Alliance.^[130]

In February 2010, he was inconvicably sentenced to two years and three months in prison for the sex affair. The leader of Self-Defence was also plagued by the troubles of his son Tomasz - in October 2010, the bank sold the agricultural machinery for non-payment of the lease. Nevertheless, Lepper was registered as a presidential candidate in the 2010 Polish presidential election. Lepper's support was highly localized - he was leading in rural and poor regions such as in Suwałki.^[131] Lepper was also the most popular candidate online, and his supporters dominated Polish social media such as NK.pl.^[132] However, this did not translate into widespread support, as Lepper was polling only 1% nationwide.^[133]

Lepper ran a traditionally leftist campaign, emphasizing that he and his party are ideological opponents of liberalism and privatisation, and proposing a socialised economy and nationalization of important industries.^[134] He promoted his concept of a Natural Disaster Fund, which would be a state-run program guaranteeing welfare and housing for victims of natural disasters, particularly floods. This harkened back to the Lepper's beginning in politics from 1991, when he emerged as the leader of local farmers impoverished by transition to capitalism as well as local flooding.^[2] Lepper also planned to renegotiate the conditions of Polish membership in the European Union, arguing that Poland is being untreated unfairly and that the subsidies for farmers are insufficient.^[135] Lepper relied on personal meetings with the voters and had a low-budget campaign at around 200.000 PLN.^[136] Lepper also stressed his opposition towards NATO,^[137] and argued for a complete withdrawal of Polish forces from Afghanistan, condemning the American operation in Afghanistan. He proposed that Poland prioritize cooperation with India, Russia and China rather than the United States. Otherwise, Lepper focused on socioeconomic issues and his economic populism, noting that other presidential candidates provide little mention of pensions, unemployment and the situation of the disabled.^[138] One of his main focus became healthcare, where Lepper proposed to suspend the debts of all hospitals, and strongly attacked privatization plans, arguing that they would further aggravate wealth inequality in Poland.^[139]

When questioned, Lepper stressed his opposition to abortion as well as euthanisation, but took a supportive stance same-sex partnerships. He also emphasized his anti-EU and anti-NATO views throughout the campaign, and decried numerous privatization proposals present in the Polish political discourse. When criticized for his numerous convictions and investigations, Lepper stated that he is proud of his criminal record, as "99 percent were trials for blockades, for defending factories and people's jobs against their executions and bailiffs".^[140] In the end, Lepper won 1.28% of the popular vote and did not make it to the second round; he offered to endorse one of the main presidential candidates, Kaczyński and Komorowski, and wrote to them asking for their opinions on increasing the minimum wage, raising pensions and annuities, as well as their agricultural policy and international affairs. In the end, Lepper endorsed neither of the candidates as their replies were similar, and ultimately unsatisfactory, to Lepper.^[141] However, Lepper did stress his opposition to Jarosław Kaczyński, accusing him of deliberately ruining his career via sting operation that the Central Anticorruption Bureau illegally attempted to incriminate Lepper with in July 2007.^[142] Shortly after the election, Lepper went to Belarus and was an international observer in the 2010 Belarusian presidential election.^[143]

Despite the disheartening performance, Lepper stated that he will seek to gain a seat in the parliament once again.^[141] In 2011, Lepper was already preparing for the next election, believing that he retains a support base that he needs to mobilize.^[144] Unexpectedly, Lepper was found dead in his office on 5 August 2011, in what was ruled to be suicide.^[145] According to the official investigation, Lepper was planning to return to Polish politics. Co-workers of Lepper such as Janusz Maksymiuk also confirmed that the politician was already planning an election campaign for his party.^[146] On the day of his suicide, the television in his room showed a paused frame from a conference between Donald Tusk and the Minister of National Defence at 13:14. The caption on the news bar read: "It's time for the campaign to begin".^[129]

In August 2011, news of the death of Andrzej Lepper reached the public. According to media reports, the leader of Samoobrona was to have hanged himself in his office, which was the party's headquarters. Before Lepper's funeral took place, the media eagerly reconstructed his last moments and the accompanying circumstances and alleged reasons for his suicide. Journalists' attention was particularly absorbed by the last hours of Lepper's life.^[114]

Death of Lepper remains a huge controversy, with the co-workers of Lepper insisting that he would not have killed himself.^[147] On the day of his suicide, Lepper arranged an interview with a journalist; the interviewer came to Lepper's headquarters at 14:00, but left after half an hour after repeatedly calling Lepper.^[144] Janusz Maksymiuk, a co-worker of Lepper, claims that he could not have committed suicide as Lepper asked him to prepare documents for his legal process several hours before his death.^[148] Some of the investigators of the Internal Security Agency also expressed doubts about Lepper's suicide, arguing that the circumstances of his death are "puzzling".^[149]

After 2011

Grey variant of the party's logo used in 2017.^[150]

After Lepper's death, the political significance of the party greatly declined, even though formally the party still existed. The party was never able to recover from the loss of its leader, and did not develop further - Samoobrona's socio-economic program posted on its website is still signed by Andrzej Lepper, and the ideology of the party greatly narrowed to continuing the legacy of Lepper.^[31]

Political scientists and media highly speculated about the effect that Samoobrona's downfall had on Polish politics, with many speculating that most of the party's former voters went to right-wing populist Law and Justice. However , according to Radosław Markowski, roughly half of Samoobrona voters stopped voting in elections. Amongst the other half that continued voting, only a quarter switched to Law and Justice, while the majority went to social-democratic SLD and agrarian PSL. Markowski argues that amongst all political parties, it is PSL that benefited the most from the collapse of Samoobrona.^[151]

In September 2013, Samoobrona participated in a protest named "In defence of Syria!" The declaration of the protest stated: "I support Syria against the war that is being financed, rearmed and planned by Western forces and their allies in the region, opposing the expansion of imperialism in the Middle East. NOT the destruction of Syria. NO repetition of the imperialist invasion in Iraq and Libya! Victory for Syria!" The protest was supported by the Polish Communist Party.^[152]

In 2014, SLD gained a substantial number of the party's voters after the son of Andrzej Lepper, Tomasz Lepper, agreed to run on its electoral list.^[153] Tomasz Lepper failed to gain a seat, despite winning the highest share of votes in his powiat.^[154] In February 2016, the party signed a cooperation agreement with the ruling party in Belarus, Belaya Rus.^[155]

In 2018, a new political party AGROunia was founded, which is an agrarian socialist party aiming to appeal to farmers and rural voters disillusioned with Law and Justice.^[156] The leader of the party Michał Kołodziejczak called his party a spiritual successor to Samoobrona and openly admitted that his political career is inspired by Andrzej Lepper.^[157] Kołodziejczak argued that the downfall of Samoobrona left an empty space in Polish political scene and resulted in voters having no left-wing party to vote for, dismissing Lewica as "urban, secular left" that no longer represents the working class. He presented AGROunia as a "normal, real left, which represents trade unions, represents workers and demands their rights" and called Lepper a "prophet", stating: "Andrzej Lepper turned out to be a prophet of what will happen in Poland. What we see today - high prices, lack of housing, hard work that unfortunately does not equal a decent salary, and still the same bunch of thieves at the trough, which has not changed since then. Lepper talked about all this in detail, and he did it in a very effective way, which we appreciate very much today."^[158]

On 5 August 2023, the 12th anniversary of Lepper's death, Kołodziejczak visited the grave of Andrzej Lepper together with the remaining members of Samoobrona and announced a Samoobrona-AGROunia coalition for the 2023 Polish parliamentary election.^[159] Announcing a join electoral list with Samoobrona, Kołodziejczak argued: "Today it is necessary to avenge what Law and Justice did to Andrzej Lepper. This is one of the motives of the people who work and operate with us."^[160] He also released a statement praising Lepper and promising to uphold his legacy: "Let us forever remember him who, when others were turned away, stood up for the Poles and their rights. He was supremely brave, though many lacked decency and courage. He was honourable, among politicians without honour. He served Poland, though many served only themselves and big business. He was with us, true to principle, in a world full of hatred and betrayal."^[161]

The coalition fell apart on 16 August as AGROunia announced its cooperation with the Civic Coalition under the leadership of Donald Tusk and his Civic Platform. The alliance was formally announced during the National Council meeting of the Civic Platform. Polish political scientist Rafał Chwedoruk praised this decision, arguing that a coalition with AGROunia will help the Civic Platform appeal to rural voters, who hitherto considered the party elitist and urban-centric. Kołodziejczak argued that the coalition is necessary to prevent vote splitting and to ensure the defeat of the United Right government; Kołodziejczak stated: "No vote must go to waste, and we must show everyone in Poland that, despite our different views, we are looking in one direction - towards a future Poland that will be strong, rich and here people will build it together. This is what I am here for, I believe in it and I will do everything: we will win with PiS, we will take back the countryside from PiS".^[162]

The party registered an electoral list for the 2023 Polish parliamentary election, but did not field any candidates for the Sejm or Senate seats. On 13 October 2023, the chairman of the party Krzysztof Prokopczyk published a statement declaring that Samoobrona does not endorse any political party and asked its supporters and sympathizers to vote according to their own conscience. The party also encouraged its supporters to participate in the 2023 Polish referendum. Despite stating its neutrality, Samoobrona also made a remark referencing the 2005 Polish presidential election: "Samoobrona RP remembers how Andrzej Lepper, winning 15% of the vote in the presidential elections, handed it over to Lech Kaczyński, who won those elections. We all remember how it ended."^[163] This remark referenced the ill-fated PiS-LPR-Samoobrona government coalition that lasted from 2005 to 2007; by the 2007 Polish parliamentary election, PiS had expelled Samoobrona from the coalition and is credited with causing the electoral downfall of Samoobrona, as PiS effectively overshadowed Samoobrona's socialist appeal with its social populist rhetoric.^[164]

The party registered two electoral committees for the 2024 Polish local elections, one for Self-Defence of the Republic of Poland and another as just "Self-Defence"; the first committee will only contest seats in the Masovian Voivodeship Sejmik,^[165] whereas the second one will run in 6 voivodeships.^[166] In Kruklanki, a local electoral committee "National Self-Defence of the Polish Fatherland" (Polish: Samoobrona Narodowa Ojczyzny Polski) was also registered; the name alludes to the Self-Defence of the Polish Nation, a right-wing split from Samoobrona that functioned between 2003 and 2023.^[167] In the 2024 Polish local elections, Self-Defence received 0.94% of the popular vote and won no seats in the voivodeship sejmiks.^[168] However, the party managed to win seats in municipal councils, winning seats in the Czastary commune,^[169] Igołomia-Wawrzeńczyce commune,^[170][171] Mielnik commune,^[172] Nurzec-Stacja commune,^[173] and Sokoły commune.^{[174][175][176][177][178]} The committee "National Self-Defence of the Polish Fatherland" also won the seat it contested in Kruklanki.^[179]

In the 2024 European Parliament election in Poland, the party registered an electoral committee, but did not field any candidates.^[180] On 28 May 2024, the party published its demands "10 priorities for Polish farming" and offered to endorse any candidate that signed it.^[181] The demands of the party included preventing trade liberalisation, objecting to raising taxes on agricultural products, and reforming or repealings parts of the European Green Deal.^[182] While Samoobrona did not directly participate in the election, a member of the party, Krzysztof Sarecki, ran on the list of a populist party Repair Poland Movement. He won 260 votes, and did not gain a seat.^[183]

Ideology

Pins of the party. The left one was in use between 1992 and 2009, and the right one has been in use since 2009.^[54]

Samoobrona espouses protectionist, nationalist and socialist views,^[58] representing a synthesis of the Polish peasant movement, Catholic social teaching and the socialist tradition of the Polish People's Republic.^[83] Samoobrona is considered a radical, agrarian and populist party representing the interests of social groups impoverished by the capitalist transition; the party appeals to the nostalgia for communist Poland, particularly the era of Edward Gierek and the communitarian way of life from that period, represented by institutions such as the State Agricultural Farms.^[184] Samoobrona is classified as a far-left party based on the poorest economic classes,^[185] and has explicitly communist origins.^[74] It is widely considered socialist - political scientists such as Sarah de Lange, Gerrit Voerman, Klaus Bachmann and Rafał Pankowski also described the party as socialist.^{[20][21][186]} The party was described as socialist by the media as well, such as the Gość Niedzielny,^[187] Newsweek Polska,^[188] and The Guardian.^[189] Samoobrona is also Eurosceptic, anti-globalization and opposes USA, which it accuses of 'colonizing' Poland.^[190]

The socialism of the party was also subclassed by some political scientists and the media - Sarah de Lange classified the party as agrarian socialist,^[20] while others also described the party as Christian socialist.^{[191][192][66]} Other classifications include "farmer socialism",^[193] and "peasant socialism" comparable to that of István Csurka, described as a mixture of "ultra-left-wing" and nationalist elements.^[194] Samoobrona was also described as socialist-populist,^[195] and compared to the Communist Party of Slovakia in that regard.^[196] Additionally, the party was described as patriotic socialist as to encompass the nationalist and socialist nature of the party,^[74] as well as to fit the party's self-description; Samoobrona describes itself as "patriotic left".^[31] Similarly, Jarosław Tomasiewicz described Samoobrona as socialist nationalist, classifying the party as one of the post-communist successors of the Polish United Workers' Party, explaining that Samoobrona became the party national communists found refuge in.^[197] The party rejects capitalism altogether and demands state-funded agriculture, expansive social programs, an end to repayments of the foreign debt, additional transaction taxes and the use of financial reserves to obtain funding, as well as the nationalisation of foreign capital.^[198] Samoobrona consistently emphasised its left-wing identity, referring to itself as "patriotic, progressive and modern left",^[199] "national left",^[200] "Catholic left",^[201] and also "socialist left".^[202][203] The party's leader Andrzej Lepper stated that "the traditions from which Samoobrona draws are the pre-war Polish Socialist Party and the Polish People's Party "Wyzwolenie", so the parties of the patriotic left, that this grassroots movement of Poles who have been wronged for 20 years wants to represent on the Polish political scene".^[31]

Samoobrona has been described as left-wing,^[204] "ultra-leftist",^[205] "left-nationalist",^[206] populist, "combining socialism and agrarian populism",^[207] "radical peasant",^[208] "leftist-populist"^[209] and "populist-nationalist".^[210] Polish political scientist Olga Wysocka describes Samoobrona as "social populists (. . .) [who] combine socialism and populism, and represent a form of left-wing populism". Leaders and members of the party generally described Samoobrona as a broad patriotic social movement based on Catholic social teaching, with some using labels such as "left-patriotic", "patriotic", "progressive", "nationalist" and even "genuinely centrist" as well.^[21] Andrzej Lepper himself ultimately described himself as left-wing, stating "I have always been and will always be a man of the left".^[211] Marek Borowski, a left-wing politician, criticised Samoobrona as a "political chameleon", but described the party as socialist and nationalist.^[34] Describing the Polish political scene of 2006, the Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies classified Samoobrona as the leading "populist left wing" party.^[75] German political scientist Nikolaus Werz described Samoobrona as an anti-globalization and anti-capitalist party that promotes protectionist, socialist and nationalist policies, combined with "a noticeable nostalgia for the People's Republic of Poland".^[212] Sociologist Heinrich Best described the party as "extreme populists and proponents of radical welfarism (...) and state socialism".^[213] In news reports, the party was consistently described as socialist - New York Times described Samoobrona as a leftist party which was "a conglomeration of farmers and socialists who favor continued heavy state subsidies", whose leader Andrzej Lepper "combined socialist policies with populist rhetoric".^[214] Conversely, Slate described the party's ideology as a "frightening mixture of nationalism and socialism".^[215]

Political scientists of both English-language and Polish-language literature also described the party as far-left.^{[216][217][218]} Paul G. Lewis and Zdenka Mansfeldová categorised Samoobrona as a post-communist Eastern European party with communist and socialist leanings, comparing it to the Communist Party of Bohemia and Moravia, Hungarian Labour Party and the Communist Party of Slovakia.^[216] Polish political scientist Andrzej Antoszewski argues that the postulates of Samoobrona are consistent with those of other neocommunist parties, although the party shows unique ethical socialist and Christian socialist leanings not found in other far-left parties of Eastern Europe. The party's program proposes a 'great national programme of economic revival', marked by a retreat from "satanic values" defined as the pursuit of maximum profits, getting rich, ruthless competition, degenerate consumerism, total commercialisation and contempt for the weak. The party also calls for the abandonment of "savage capitalism, the free market, fiscal terror and monetarist-bank parasitism"; Antoszewski described this rhetoric as particularly characteristic of neo-communist parties.^[219]

Ryszard Herbut compares Samoobrona to a fellow far-left populist and agrarian party Union of the Workers of Slovakia - both parties praised "the economic and social principles of communism (while verbally dissociating itself from some of the mistakes of the past), criticised the capitalist development model adopted after 1989, negatively assessed the process of political, economic and military integration of Europe and protested against globalisation".^[220] Samoobrona was known for its positive attitude towards Communist Poland;^[221] Sławomir Drelich called the party "the most post-communist party on the Polish political scene".^[44] Bartek Pytlas argues that Samoobrona did not draw back to historical nationalist parties and movements in its political tradition, but rather looked to communist Poland and continued its socialist legacy. At the same time, the party sought to define itself as Catholic.^[74]

Some media reports tended to call Samoobrona right-wing, often to equate it with the League of Polish Families, a fellow anti-establishment and populist party in Poland.^[16][17] However, most political scientists classified Samoobrona as left-wing.^{[20][21][27][29]} Sarah de Lange and Gerrit Voerman stated that Samoobrona formed a distinct form of left-wing populism and agrarian socialism, drifting towards conventional left in the mid-2000s.^[20] Comparing Samoobrona to the League of Polish Families, Rafał Pankowski argued that Samoobrona voters were most concerned about economic hardship and supported the party over economic issues, while the right-wing LPR attracted motivated by nationalist values instead; LPR supporters were by far,the most religious group of all Polish party constituencies, while supporters of Samoobrona reported the lowest income.^[36] Olga Wysocka also points out that Samoobrona aspired to be a "voice of the disadvantaged", and focused on economic issues.^[222]

The party stated its commitment to Catholic social teaching and opposed the legalisation of euthanasia, abortion and soft drugs.^[223] However, Samoobrona also promoted legalising same-sex partnerships in Poland and animal welfare, ultimately undermining its agrarian image and changing the stance of nationalist circles towards it from ambivalent to hostile.^[128] Karol Kostrzębski argues that Samoobrona had much more in common with other post-communist left-wing parties than right-wing ones such as LPR or PiS, classifying as a staunchly left-wing party.^[27] Kostrzębski also highlights that Samoobrona was heavily involved in trade unions, was the most popular party amongst Polish unionised workers and called for abolition of capitalism.^[27] Polish columnist Marek Migalski classifies Samoobrona as a left-wing "populist-etatist" party,^[23] while Polish political scientist Andrzej Antoszewski places Samoobrona among the Central European extreme left and "neo-communist" groupings, although at the same time he emphasises that Samoobrona is the only case in this group with a non-communist origin.^[26] Tadeusz Piskorski highlights that in the 2000s Samoobrona transitioned from a protest party to a "stabilised left-wing party", which competed with other left-wing parties for voters.^[39] In a 2005 survey of Samoobrona members, over 50% identified as politically left-wing , while only 26% members identified as right-wing.^[46]

Rafał Pankowski classified Samoobrona as a left-wing populist party that utilised anti-globalisation and anti-liberal rhetoric to appeal to those left behind by the Polish transition to capitalism and integration with Western markets. Pankowski wrote: "it was first of all a voice of social protest against liberalism, appealing to those who were economically worse off as a result of the capitalist transition". While researching the party and its ideology in the 2000s, Ola Wysocka recalls: "in 2006 at the V National Congress of Self-Defence, I asked members of the party to indicate who the party represented. Most of them pointed to “the people”. When prompted to be more specific, they added “disadvantaged people”".^[222]

Poland's June 2003 referendum on membership of the European Union was an uncomfortable experience for Samoobrona. On one hand, the party's isolationism and Euroscepticism led it to call officially for a "no" vote.^[224] In 2002, the party even declared: "When they are in the European Union, the Poles will be slaves. They will wipe the buttocks of German women or else sweep the streets of this country."^[225] On the other hand, most political observers believed (correctly) that the Polish would vote in favour of membership, and as a populist party Samoobrona was unhappy about the likelihood of being on the losing side. In the end, the party fought a rather ambiguous campaign, with its posters carrying the slogan "the decision belongs to you". As a result, Andrzej Lepper promoted a flexible stance on the European Union where he often criticised the organisation, yet was not inherently opposed to joining it; he explained:

I have never said we are against the integration because of any threats to Catholic faith or to national identity. We are not like the LPR who incite fear of such things among people. My point is that the conditions for membership as negotiated by the government are unfavourable. That is why we are going to adopt a negative position on the accession at the congress. However, we do not call anybody to vote “No”. Our slogan is “The choice is yours”.^[226]

In 2005, Samoobrona was a founding member of the EUDemocrats (EUD) pan-European political party, which professes to unite "EU-critical" parties committed to increased democratization and decentralization.^[227] The EUDemocrats' political platform argued that European integration was leading Europe towards a centralised unitary state. Integration was seen as the consequence of a permissive consensus of "furtive elites who had blindfolded citizens". The party sought to restore the principle of subsidiarity, believing that too much had already been ceded to the EU and had to be recovered. It promoted the concept of "flexible integration", which would allow countries to use enhanced cooperation procedures only when they wished, without the possibility of forcing cooperation on all members. Only "truly cross-border issues" were to be dealt with at the EU level, defined as guaranteeing the four fundamental freedoms and a common environmental policy. In its program, the EUD also wanted to exclude several policy areas from the competences of the EU, notably common trade policy, education, cultural policy and common foreign policy. The party was described as presenting a position of "minimalist Eurorealism", seeking to transform the EU into a free trade area with minimal supranational competences. A cooperation agreement between states was to replace the EU Constitution, with the option for states to opt for a simple free trade agreement without other EU obligations. The party was concerned about parliamentary control, the environment and minimum social standards, and strongly distrusted any European military role. It was seen as a key statement of left-wing Euroscepticism, in line with Samoobrona's political position.^[228]

Samoobrona sought support from these social groups that found themselves impoverished in the new capitalist, post-community Polish economy. As such, low-skilled workers, those living in rural or impoverished areas and unemployed were the main base of the party. The support of the party was strongest in rural and agricultural areas.^[229] Samoobrona failed to win the support of strongly conservative constituencies, and a significant number of Samoobrona were left-wing or formerly socialist.^[59] Agricultural and blue-collar workers built the backbone of the party's voting base, while white-collar workers generally held negative views of the party. A correlation to religion was also found - devout Catholics were much more likely to vote for Samoobrona than atheists or those with ambiguous attitude towards religion.^[229] The party's electorate was overwhelmingly left-wing as Samoobrona appealed to groups that felt alienated by all other political parties - this included left-wing Eurosceptics and the poorest layers of Polish society. The electorate of Samoobrona was much more left-wing than that of any other Polish political party and non-voters.^[230]

Throughs its radical populism and confrontational, direct action in "protection of the "poor and the disadvantaged", Samoobrona distinguished itself as a party that appealed to the "losers" of the capitalist transition.^[75] Samoobrona was labeled as a radical populist-left party and focused on socio-economic issues, sidelining religious and cultural aspects in favor of targetting socially marginalized and economically struggling groups. The party was considered "anti-elitist, anti-institutional, anti-procedural and de facto anti-democratic, in the sense attached to democracy in liberal representative democracies". While some political commentators disparagingly called Samoobrona "a party of losers" and claimed that it was mainly supported by failed entrepreneurs and unsuccessful middle class, the party was mostly supported by the "excluded, lost, and helpless".^[231] Samoobrona had a similar voter base with the far-right League of Polish Families, with both parties being overwhelmingly supported by poor rural voters and other groups languishing under free market reforms.^[232] However, whereas support for the League of Polish Families was strongly determined by church attendance, support for Samoobrona was determined by low income instead.^[233]

Economics

Samoobrona had a protectionist attitude toward the country's economy. They wanted to take higher custom tariffs on foreign goods. Party opted for controlling of Narodowy Bank Polski by Sejm. Additionally, the party's leader Andrzej Lepper was in favor of reintroducing PGRs which were state-owned and controlled homesteads existing during the communist era in Poland.^[234] Samoobrona called itself "the voice of all social groups which, as a result of the reforms of the 1990s, have found themselves on the edge of poverty and despair" and in 2002, Andrzej Lepper stated: "I am the voice of the poor, deprived and humiliated … Self-Defence and Andrzej Lepper never were, are not, and never will be ‘them’. We are ‘us’."^[235]

The party also expressed vehement opposition to capitalism, stating that "capitalism is the primacy of capital and profit over labour and man" and arguing that "capitalism is that system which has already outlived itself". Lepper declared that Samoobrona was an anti-capitalist party, arguing that capitalism results in "degenerate consumerism".^[236] Samoobrona stated that it desires "a strong state that will deservedly command the respect of all citizens, as a guarantor of their security, and thus create a structure with which they will want to identify".^[31] The party promotes an economic program that mixes agrarianism with economic nationalism, socialism, and religious elements.^[237] Central to the party's economic agenda is its complete rejection of capitalism - Samoobrona rejects both commerce and the market itself. According to Vít Hloušek and Lubomír Kopeček, the program of the party also incorporates anarchist elements.^[198] The party is very close ideologically to radical left-wing agrarian formations from the era of Second Polish Republic. Rhetorically, Samoobrona also includes a strongly Catholic moralist message, calling for a return of supposedly abandoned Catholic and humanitarian values, and wishes to fight "satanic" values in society such as consumerism.^[198]

According to Luke March, the party promoted a radical anti-globalisation and anti-neoliberal rhetoric and closely embraced trade unions, with the resulting economic program being an agrarian socialist and left-wing populist vision. Samoobrona promoted a highly interventionist system and wanted to replace materialism and consumerism with a closer relationship with the natural environment, including "the preservation of small-scale family farms and a humane treatment of animals". Party members made reference to terms such as "eco-development" and "econology", which aimed to promote ecology, Catholic ethics and morality in both economics and politics. The main concept of the party's economic ideology was social justice; in its 1999 manifesto the party stated: "We want a Poland, in which there will not be such drastic material differences: no so-called ‘ocean of destitution’ with tiny islands of wealth and well-being".^[238]

In 1994, the program of Samoobrona stated: "Capitalism is not a perpetual system. It must give way to new concepts of human relations, to a new ecological morality. A new post-capitalist era is already being born".^[239] The postulates of Andrzej Lepper and his party were egalitarian, emphasising above all the need for a fair redistribution of wealth and the subordination of the economy and its mechanisms to serve social and common good. The party strongly demanded state intervention in the economy, and stressed the need to apply protectionist customs aimed at protecting the interests of domestic producers. Lepper argued that in the light of the experience of capitalist countries, it was dangerous to "succumb to dogmatic thinking consisting in an unwavering belief in the superiority of capitalist free market mechanisms in all areas of economic life". Samoobrona argued that the adherence of post-communist Polish governments to dogmatic capitalism had led to the abandonment of the basic tasks of the state and the violation of essential human rights.^[240]

The party is generally considered to have been the most critical, and even negative, of the post-1989 transition into a market economy. Samoobrona strongly opposed deregulation and privatisation, and wanted to reverse these actions. Samoobrona also promoted anti-globalization rhetoric, believing that neoliberal economics first and foremost serves the international financial institutions and leads to a situation where "a few hundred companies in the world want to dominate everything". Referring to the Marxist doctrine, Lepper believed that "he who has power has ownership of the means of production".^[241] The party believed that public ownership should have supremacy over any kind of private property, arguing that "private property cannot be treated as privileged, sacred and inviolable". The party also proposed restoration of state monopolies, including total state ownership of raw materials, mining industries, the energy sector, armaments, transport infrastructure, banking and insurance, as well as lottery, spirits and tobacco industry, regarded by the party as important sources of budget revenue.^[242]

Samoobrona attributed great importance to trade unions and cooperatives, arguing that its heritage dating back to the 19th century was destroyed in 1990. The party accused Polish politicians of destroying Polish cooperatives, including entities with such long-standing traditions as "Społem" and "Samopomoc Chłopska", arguing that individual governments did not try to counteract the discriminatory practices applied to cooperatives by banks and other institutions.^[243] Co-operatives, according to Samoobrona, should benefit from fiscal facilities and the state should undertake the task of stimulating the dying co-operative movement. Samoobrona argued that trade unions and rural cooperatives are to fulfill a very important economic role, and credited these groups with enforcing several pro-worker reforms in Western countries.^[244]

One of the key properties of the party's economic ideology was its positive assessment of socialism and communism. Lepper believed that there is no point in "ritual condemnations of Soviet Communism" and argued that the atrocities of Joseph Stalin should be seen as degeneration of communist doctrine rather than the result of it. In regards to the Polish People's Republic, Lepper stated: "...I do not agree (...) that those 45 years were lost for Poland, that today we are starting from scratch".^[221] The party had a particularly high opinion of Edward Gierek's rule, which was regarded as a time of modernisation based on Western models. The intransigent critics of the communist period, located in the Law and Justice party and the Solidarity movement, were described by Samoobrona as "extreme right-wing". Mirosław Karwat considered Samoobrona to be "probably the only political party that speaks well of Communist Poland".^[42]

Social issues

Because of the diverse nature of the party that tried to mix Catholic, socialist, agrarian and populist currents, Samoobrona often avoided taking a clear stance on social issues.^[245] Samoobrona was based on the social teaching of Catholic Church, but at the same time presented an eclectic stance on social issues and tried to incorporate both political Catholic and socially left-wing thought. As the result, the program of the party was not linked to an authoritarian position on socio-cultural matters, and the leader of the party claimed to support freedom of religion and conscience.^[246] However, some political scientists argue that Samoobrona espouses "a kind of social conservatism" similar to one of Polish communists of the late 1980s, represented by the Patriotic Movement for National Rebirth.^[247] Political scientists Michael Minkenberg and Pascal Perrineau noted that while Samoobrona evades easy programmatic classification on social issues, a part of its agrarian appeal and "common-man" identity was built on nationalism, "cultural traditionalism" and authoritative protectionism.^[248]

Samoobrona opposed death penalty, citing the need to follow Catholic social teaching.^[249] The party had a nearly identical attitude towards euthanasia, opposing it on the basis of Catholicism as well.^[250] It also opposes the legalisation of soft drugs such as marijuana.^[223] In regards to abortion, the party argued that it should not be solved through legal regulations, but by improving material conditions for women.^[251] The leader of the party Andrzej Lepper considered abortion permissible in limited cases.^[252] Ultimately, the party positioned itself as against abortion, citing the ethical dilemma it poses and the stance of the Catholic Church on the matter;^[253] Samoobrona proposed to keep abortion illegal and argued that the solution to the problem is not to make abortons legal, but to create optimal material conditions for vulnerable women by providing stable sources of income, housing and sex education. In 2005, the party advocated for full protection of life from conception to natural death as a constitutional provision.^[251] In 2005, one of demands to President-elect Lech Kaczyński was to add this provision, together with implementing minimum subsistence benefits for the unemployed, abolishing taxes for incomes below the subsistence level, and withdrawing Polish troops from Iraq.^[254] The party had more defined, leftist positions on other matters. Samoobrona was declared in its party platform to legalize civil unions to same-sex couples. Alongside SLD it was the only party who voted in favor of a bill embracing civil unions in 2004.^[255][256] The party also opposed decommunization policies,^[257] with both members and supporters of Samoobrona being most opposed to decommunization out of all parties.^[258] In October 2002, Samoobrona passed a bill that exempted communist intelligence and counter-intelligence collaborators from lustration (exclusion from civil service positions).^[259] This made the party be considered as the "most post-communist" party in Polish politics.^[260]

On social issues, Samoobrona was considered to be highly flexible; Lepper mainly focused on pressing his anti-establishment credentials, promoting Catholic social values and courting Catholic media such as Radio Maryja. At the same time, Lepper expressed his support for legalizing same-sex partnerships, an anathema to Christian conservatives. Lepper also made overtures with left-wing parties such as the Polish Socialist Party led by Piotr Ikonowicz and the democratic-socialist National Party of Retirees and Pensioners, proposing to establish "a worker–peasant alliance". Perhaps the best illustration of the Samoobrona's ideological flexibility is that despite leading an agrarian and anti-liberal movement, Lepper also promoted environmentalism. Lepper received the Albert Schweitzer Medal from New York-based Animal Welfare Institute in the early 2000s, and Samoobrona was praised by American animal activists. Lepper stated that animals must be "treated with respect, dignity and sympathy" and condemned modern methods of meat production as "concentration camps for animals".^[128]

Because of the overwhelmingly diverse electorate and the impossibility of developing a unified position in the most intense debates regarding ethics and religion within the party, Samoobrona tries not to proclaim an unequivocal view on social issues, often simply avoiding taking any position in the public debate. Lepper only emphasised that Catholic ethics and the achievements of the Church are an important element of the cultural heritage shaping national and regional identity. Mateusz Piskorski argued that on social matters, Samoobrona often presented moderate or centre-left views.^[245] The party had the most left-wing electorate out of all Polish political parties, including social-democratic and socialist ones.^[261] The party made constant appeals to social justice and poor living conditions while dismissing complaints of moral decline as false and alarmist.^[253] The party supported milder sentences and argued that it is pointless to see the new generation and cultural currents as the source of crime; instead, Samoobrona stated that crime is caused "no education, no job, no vision for the future" and decried capitalist transition in Poland for creating a "criminogenic" environment.^[262]

One of the most debates social topics in Polish politics was the issue of abortion. Samoobrona's position on this issue is rather moderate; as in many other cases, Andrzej Lepper pointed to the social sources of the large number of abortions, related to social exclusion and poverty. Jacek Raciborski argues that statements by the leader of Samoobrona indicated that he was closer to a moderate liberal position on this issue.^[263] As such, Samoobrona made statements regarding not only the ethical aspects of the issue, but also the demographic dimension of the problem was emphasised. In 2005, the party was in favour of retaining the wording of the abortion legislation at the time, considering it a valuable compromise reached on this issue. The contemporary system for the protection of children's rights and the prevention of domestic violence has also provoked discussions on the possibility of additional criminalisation of violence against children. Samoobrona in 2005 supported a bill prepared by the offices of the Commissioner for Equal Status of Women and Men to introduce a ban on physical punishment of minors.^[253]

Regarding the issue of the LGBT community, Piskorski argued that "it is rather difficult to find any homophobic themes in the program enunciations and speeches of Samoobrona politicians".^[264] Lepper stressed that he was in favour of allowing the organisation of pride parades, although he stipulated that they should not provide an opportunity for speech that could be considered "demoralising".^[199] Lepper argued that the existence of sexual minorities was a normal phenomenon that there was no point in stigmatising in any way, and stated his neutrality on the issue of granting homosexual couples the possibility to marry and adopt children.^[265] Unlike politicians of the far right, Lepper did not regard homosexuality as a disease, and called it "a certain genetic predisposition that occurs in every era". Nevertheless, the problem of sexual minorities was sometimes consciously marginalised by Samoobrona politicians; it was argued that some left-wing formations gave it too much importance, and thus pushed far more important issues concerning the social and economic rights of the majority of citizens into the background.^[266]

Although Samoobrona has repeatedly been accused of nationalist or even xenophobic tendencies, the party did not devote much space in its public activities to the issue of national and ethnic minorities.^[267] The understanding of the nation preferred by the party leaders was not ethnocentric and exclusivist in nature; the national community was treated as "a collectivity constituted by ties of culture, tradition and history, and not by common origin". Lepper argued for the necessity of equal rights for all minorities with other Polish citizens, deeming property claims based on nationality to be unjustified. The party also had a notable regionalist movement, and some Samoobrona politicians discussed the problem of Silesians, regarded as a nation on its own that was often marginalised or suppressed.^[268] In 2007, Samoobrona proposed to recognize the Silesian language as an official regional language in Poland.^[122] Starting in the early 2000s, Lepper also became a spokesman for the Belarusian minority in Poland, pledging to fight for the subsidies taken away from the Belarusian Socio-Cultural Association as part of the austerity measures imposed by the Polish government. He argued that the development of ethnic minorities in Poland is endangered as they had no chance of survival in the absence of adequate funding. Lepper also stated that Samoobrona wants to be an advocate for national minorities, which sparked speculation in the media that Samoobrona wants to replace other left-wing parties in the role of an advocate for Polish minorities.^[102] This was reflected by Samoobrona becoming the preferred party of the Ukrainian minority in Poland.^[103] The regionalist wing split off from Samoobrona in 2007, creating the Party of Regions.^[269]

The party also spoke in favour of gender equality while in the Sejm, surprising political commentators with its progressive stance, as the party assigned the blame for social ills on systemic problems, rather than the decline of the traditional family. In 2004, Samoobrona's member of parliament Włodzimierz Czechowski said:

The circumstances for family development are so stressful and harmful nowadays that we should be surprised anyone is still having children. Being laid off is a failure and loss of one's life's work, the dissolution and pathology of the family. It's only thanks to the wisdom of Polish women that impoverished families haven't started selling their children yet. Dear ladies! It's not men who discriminate against women, it's Poland's nasty liberal policy, which results in unemployment levels unheard of in Europe. Isn't it hypocrisy to appoint special institutions that fight for women's right without taking care of the country's economic development? The legal system is discriminating against you, women. Subsidies, child support and welfare payments have been fixed at below the biological minimum.^[76]

In regards to electoral law, the party was a staunch supporter of proportional representation. Samoobrona spoke on 2000s attempts to reform the Polish electoral law by right-wing Law and Justice (PiS); in July 2006, PiS submitted the electoral reform to the Speaker of the Sejm - the law introduced blocks of lists in municipalities with over 20 000 inhabitants, with the simultaneous application of the d'Hondt method in the intra-group distribution of votes for seats and the rule that groups of lists which received at least 10% of the validly cast votes could participate in the distribution of seats at all levels of local government elections. This law was criticised for undeservedly favouring the strongest parties of the bloc, giving them a significant over-representation in future councils and assemblies. Despite forming a coalition government with PiS at the time, Samoobrona also opposed this law, and called for abandonment of the D'Hondt method in favour of a more proportional apportionment method; Sainte-Laguë method used in the 2001 Polish parliamentary election was seen as the best and more proportional alternative at the time.^[270]

The party was considered to have some disdain for democracy. This was expressed through Lepper's remark that "There's too much talk about democracy - people can see it's only for elites. Only 5% of the population have made any money out of it at the expense of all the others. People have had enough..."^[232] While Samoobrona was considered anti-institutional, anti-procedural and anti-democratic, its opposition to democracy specifically applied to opposing liberal democracy in particular.^[231] The party called Polish regime a "sham democracy" that they portrayed as a de facto oligarchy, where "Poles voted for different parties and still Balcerowicz popped out of the ballot box". Samoobrona proposed a new parliamentary form of democracy where the president would be elected by universal suffrage but limited by a special "presidential council" appointed by the parliament. Polish Senate was to be replaced with a special, socio-professional chamber consisting of local governments and trade unions. Lastly, Samoobrona emphasized the need to introduce local self-government, especially to culturally unique regions and nations such as Silesia and Kashubia.^[271]

Foreign policy

One of the leading demands of Samoobrona in the field of foreign policy was the demand for its full economisation. This process was to involve a move away from ideological principles to a calculation based solely on estimating the benefits of trade with specific countries. The political assessment of a foreign economic partner was not to be given any importance; the only binding criterion for assessing foreign policy should be the growth of Polish exports and the possibilities for Polish entities to derive financial benefits.^[272]

An additional, complementary field of action for diplomacy was to combat negative stereotypes of Poles in other countries, described by Samoobrona as anti-Polish. According to the party, it should be the duty of Polish diplomats, as well as politicians sitting in the European Parliament, to oppose negative stereotypes and historical falsifications, such as the use of the phrase "Polish concentration camps" in foreign journalism. An important role as ambassador of Polish interests abroad was attributed to the Polish diasporas scattered around the world.^[273] It was postulated that Polish diasporas should be covered by state aid and be given the opportunity to return to their homeland. Samoobrona supported a bill providing the possibility for representatives of the Polish minority abroad to obtain Karta Polaka, arguing that the survival of Polish culture and language should be a reason for respect for Poles living abroad. The repatriation operation of Kazakhstan residents of Polish origin also met with the party's support.^[274]

Many authors and commentators, both Polish and foreign ones, considered Self-Defence of the Republic of Poland to be a Eurosceptic party.^[275] This was due to the party's protectionist and nationalist program, which many commentators considered Eurosceptic by nature.^[276] According to some authors, labelling Samoobrona as a Eurosceptic party was legitimate given opinion polls, which showed that in terms of opposition to Poland's accession to the EU, Samoobrona were only slightly less hostile to EU than the LPR voters.^[277] However, while for the LPR the issue of European integration was one of the most important ones, in the case of Samoobrona, the issue of EU did not play an important role.^[278]

Lepper argued that Samoobrona's criticism of the EU accession was exclusively related to the conditions of Poland's membership in the Union, and not a negation of the purposefulness of integration processes as such. The basis of Samoobrona's position was based on a set of beliefs characteristic of the so-called economic Euroscepticism. The party's declared pragmatism in assessing the consequences of possible membership was characteristic, and the inconsistency of views and assessments on European integration was most likely linked to the existence of diverse attitudes on the issue among both party members and supporters themselves, which became particularly evident after 1 May 2004, when some Samoobrona members became beneficiaries of the EU Common Agricultural Policy. Because of the lack of decisive and conclusive enunciations on Poland's membership in the Union, J. Sielski described the party's position on European integration as "Euro-populist".^[279]

The leader of Samoobrona himself preferred to call his stance on Poland's participation in the European integration process "Eurorealism", and directed his criticism of the unfavourable provisions of the Accession Treaty at Polish governments and negotiators rather than European Commission officials. According to Piskorski, given the presence of a number of features which would indeed make it possible to classify the party into the Eurorealist camp (an ambivalent attitude to the accession, the secondary role of this issue in programme pronouncements, variability of rhetoric resulting from the assessment of the mood of the electorate), "such self-identification seems to be largely justified".^[280]

The party took a moderately sceptical stance on the introduction of a common European currency in Poland. According to Lepper, accession to the Monetary Union would be advisable only on the condition that Poland achieves a level of economic development similar to that of Western European countries; otherwise, depriving the National Bank of Poland of the ability to shape monetary policy poses a threat to the country's sovereignty in this fundamental area. In addition, it was argued that the price effects of the introduction of the euro would be unacceptable to Polish society. The party's experts argued that the countries that had not decided to join the euro area maintained a higher level of economic development while avoiding the price increases that the introduction of the common currency would have caused.^[281]

The party declared its support for the process of further enlargement of the European Union, in contrast to right-wing parties, allowing membership to be granted not only to Ukraine, but also to Turkey.^[282] The commencement of negotiations with the latter country was supported by the majority of Samoobrona MEPs, who voted in favour of the relevant resolution. Unlike some right-wing parties, Samoobrona did not make support for a country's EU membership dependent on its cultural face and civilisational affiliation, but only on the fulfilment of formal membership conditions. On the other hand, it declared that the country's admission to the EU should not be at the expense of the funds allocated to Poland, which led R. Czarnecki to conclude that rather unhurried negotiations were necessary.^[283]

The participation of Polish soldiers in the NATO operation in Afghanistan was consistently contested by Samoobrona. The main arguments cited were the cost of warfare and the risk of loss of life of Polish soldiers. Samoobrona was very consistently and strongly opposed to the Iraq War.^[284] It was the only Polish party which as late as at the turn of 2002 and 2003 (before the invasion began) stated its expression to war.^[285] After the invasion of Iraq and the overthrow of Hussein's government, Lepper suggested that the forces of the international coalition should be replaced by peacekeeping formations operating under the aegis of the United Nations. In a petition addressed to then President Aleksander Kwaśniewski, Samoobrona also drew attention to the contradictory nature of the operation in Iraq against international law. It was emphasised that a sovereign country, posing no threat, even potential, to Poland's security, had been attacked. The war in Iraq was described as "aggressive" and constituting a violation of international standards.^[286]

The party was also described as pro-Russian, anti-NATO and anti-EU. Describing the party, German political scientist Nikolaus Werz wrote that Samoobrona "rejects globalisation, criticises the free market economy and strikes a protectionist, socialist and nationalist tone. There are also pro-Russian tendencies and a noticeable nostalgia for the People's Republic of Poland. Lepper is an opponent of Poland's membership of NATO and the EU."^[287] Marijuš Antonovič wrote that League of Polish Families and Samoobrona were two Polish parties "which did not hide their pro‑Moscow foreign policy views"; Andrzej Lepper was awarded two honoris causa doctoral titles in Russia, and Samoobrona members were invited to Russia by the Russian government for common projects.^[288] In its program, Samoobrona also emphasized that it attached particular importance to Polish relations with Russia, and condemned emerging tensions between two countries as an attempt to cut off Poland from trade and make it fall into economic domination of the Western countries. The party's deputy, Bolesław Borysiuk, presented a plan of establishing "Joint Polish-Russian Commission for Trade and Economic Cooperation", which would foster cooperation with Russia at regional level and also establish a joint Polish-Russian bank that would finance trade.^[289]

Samoobrona promoted ties with Russia in culture and science; this sympathy was extended to Ukraine as well as Belarus, with Lepper stating that Poland should only enter the EU together with Ukraine, stressing the 'brotherhood' of both countries.^[289] In regards to Belarus, Samoobrona wanted to normalise Polish relations with the Belarusian president Lukashenko, and thus persistently distanced itself from any negative assessments of the Belarusian government, often condemning allegations of human and civil rights violations as either fake or exaggerated. In 2005, the party condemned "ethnic hatred" incited by the Union of Poles in Belarus and declared its support for Lukashenko.^[290] In 1999, Samoobrona also protested NATO attacks on Yugoslavia, stating that "NATO rejected the mask of a defence pact and became a gendarme, guarding the interests of international finance". In 2005, Russian philosopher Aleksandr Dugin referred to Samoobrona as "the only pro-Russian party in Poland". Similar conclusion was reached by the Czech political scientist Marek Čejka, who wrote that Samoobrona "was often considered the party in parliament most favourable to the idea of Polish-Russian cooperation."^[289] The party was also critical of Americanism and Atlanticism of the Polish government, and promoted friendly relations with China in addition to supporting Russia.^[223]

Commenting on the 2023 Israeli invasion of the Gaza Strip, Samoobrona called the Gaza Strip "a strip of shame for the US and for the world". The party also declared its support for Catalan independence and Scottish independence.^[291] In its 2024 program, the party praised Palestine and Kurdistan, calling them "great nations" that are "constantly fighting for land, territory and the international community is deaf to these efforts."^[292]

Religion

Samoobrona strongly emphasised its attachment to Roman Catholicism, particularly valuing the authority of Pope John Paul II; the leader of Samoobrona highlighted his visits to the Vatican, emphasising that he considered the Pope to be anmoral unquestionable authority. In numerous party programme documents issued over the course of several years, there were frequent references to the achievements of John Paul II and attempts to interpret Polish socio-economic reality in terms of the pope's proposed ethical standards. In interpreting the Pope's teaching, Samoobrona particularly accentuated those that included criticism of capitalism.^[31]

The party was particularly attached to the declaration of Pope John Paul II from 1991, stating: "It is unacceptable to claim that, after the defeat of real socialism, capitalism remained the only model of economic organisation". Samoobrona often repeated and highlighted this quote. The party argued that the downfall of communist Poland was not caused by its socialist economy, but rather by state atheism and its hostility towards the Catholic Church and its social teaching.^[31] Samoobrona contrasted this with its own socialism, which it described as based on agrarianism, patriotism and the Catholic social teaching. The party believed that this kind of Polish socialism, based on nationalist and religious tradition, would be the best possible system for Poland. The party promoted an utopian vision of "Polish socialism" based on small family farms, rural co-operatives, an end to the exploitation of the countryside and nationalised industry, with peasants being considered the "healthiest element of society, both biologically and morally".^[238]

In the party's program there is a whole series of declarations and sometimes direct references to the concepts proclaimed by Catholic social teaching.^[293] In 1995, Lepper declared that "the indications in the Encyclicals of John Paul II, especially in the Encyclical Laborem Exercens, became an inspiration for us in the formulation of our professional and social programmes", lamenting the insufficient presentation of the achievements of Catholic social teaching in the mass media. The social teaching of the Church was to provide an alternative to capitalism and neoliberalism; in this case, reference was made not only to papal encyclicals, but also to the sermons of Cardinal Wyszyński, in which the postulate of Poland's embarking on its own path of social and economic development, resulting from its specific tradition, was found. The party's program from 2003 also stated: "The Self-Defence of the Republic of Poland is guided by the social teaching of the Church and fully shares the indications of the greatest moral authority of our times, Pope John Paul II, contained in his encyclicals".^[294]

Samoobrona also self-identified as Christian left, claiming to represent a broad group of both Catholic and secular left; Lepper stated: "A social economy, free education, culture, education and health care, decent living conditions for pensioners, blocking the negative effects of globalisation, caring for the environment - these are just selected examples of leftism in state policy." However, the party rejected National Catholicism, and Lepper rejected the view of National Catholic circles that the Church and Roman Catholics are being discriminated and excluded from the public life of Poland, calling such criticisms "too alarmist and exaggerated".^[253]

The party used a lot of religious rhetoric in regards to economic issues, presenting anti-capitalist, anti-liberal, anti-"cosmopolitan" and anti-market ideas. The key foundation of economic ideology of Samoobrona was a combination of socialism with the principles of Catholic social teaching, rejecting capitalism as "fiscal repression and total commercialisation" while also strongly attacking a "reductionist" economic-theoretical approach, typical of the "Anglo-Germanic mentality" and based on the "Protestant dogma of predestination". As a counter-proposal, the party praised "econology", defined as the prioritisation of ecology in economic thinking. The post-1989 socioeconomic situation in Poland was described as "socio-economic satanism" or "economic genocide", and the party manifesto read: "All the tragedies that the Poles are experiencing ... are the consequence of the loss of their own sovereignty and the subordination of the country to foreign interests, as carried out by a group of venal politicians who, thanks to political fraud and by lying to the Polish people, have been able to make their own decisions. are the consequence of the loss of their own sovereignty and the subordination of the country to foreign interests, as carried out by a group of venal politicians who have brought themselves to power thanks to political fraud and by lying to the voters."^[295] However, Samoobrona is explicitly socialist and not only sympathises with the former People's Republic of Poland, but openly identifies with its communist form of society and socialist ideals.^[296]

Despite its attachment to Catholicism, the party also made statements critical of the church. Lepper deplored the attitude of a part of the Catholic hierarchy, for example by criticising the lack of interest of Primate Józef Glemp in a meeting with the party's delegation.^[297] During the transformation period, the Polish bishops were accused of lacking social sensitivity, and of being materialistic and building a financial empire; Lepper went as far as stating that "they value money more than God". Glemp was criticised by Samoobrona for his lack of concern for the fate of Polish farmers, above all in the context of the Primate's statements suggesting support for police interventions against participants of agricultural blockades.^[298] Additionally, Andrzej Lepper expressed some understanding for the demands appearing in the 1990s in the circles of secular left for excluding religious instruction from public schools.^[299]

Political scientists compared Samoobrona to socialist and far-left movements of Latin America. Paweł Przyłęcki argued that the party "had all the main elements of the populist and socialist policies pursued in Latin American countries, particularly Argentina".^[300] One of the elements typical for far-left Latin American political discourse that Samoobrona was seen as incorporating is liberation theology.^[301] While conceptually communism was considered incompatible with Catholicism as it disrupted sociocultural traditions that the Church relied on, the relationship of between Catholicism and communist policies was complex and widely differed depending on the attitude of the local regime towards religion. While liberation theology was much less influential in Poland than in Latin America, highly popular Polish Pope John Paul II espoused liberation theology that avoided Marxist language.^[302] Gerald J. Beyer wrote in The American Journal of Economics and Sociology that social teaching of John Paul II echoed central points of liberation theology; John Paul II wrote that the Church tradition is “in clear opposition to capitalism as a socioeconomic system as well as a general system of values” and affirmed that despite its flaws, communism correctly recognizes humans as social being while condemning liberalism for seeing humans as “isolated” being who enter into relationships only for “egocentric interests”. While rejecting its atheistic and materialistic characteristics, John Paul II stated that Marxism had a “kernel of truth” regarding the need for common possession of goods and rejection of capitalism as an inherently inhumane and exploitative system.^[303] Samoobrona represented a radicalized version of papal teaching, fully endorsing the social teaching of John Paul II on one hand, while praising the communist Polish People's Republic on the other.^[304]

On the other hand, the group supported the ratification of the concordat with the Holy See, accepting "the unique position of the Catholic Church vis-à-vis other confessions in Poland". Given the much higher level of religiosity in rural areas, Samoobrona's leaders often appeared at religious ceremonies without political risk and even gained some support, for example on the occasion of the Jasna Góra Harvest Festival.^[305] This did not prevent them from criticising those representatives of the Episcopate who were critical of the agricultural protests co-organised by Samoobrona.^[306] On the other hand, party politicians emphasised that they boasted the sympathy of a large proportion of parish priests in rural parishes. The party's electorate, according to available surveys, was heterogeneous on issues related to the desirable nature of state-church relations. While it was possible to discern among party sympathisers supporters of limiting the role of the Church as an institution in public life (e.g. those advocating the abolition of the Church Fund), anticlerical sentiments did not turn into attempts to negate the ethical message of the Roman Catholic Church.^[299]

Ecology

In 1993, Andrzej Lepper took part in an interview with journalists Jan Ul and Henryk Gaworski, where Lepper introduced Samoobrona and the ideology of the party. Lepper identified with the rebel faction of the Polish United Workers' Party that opposed the leading "Jaruzelski-Rakowski" wing and wanted to prevent the "policy of selling out genuinely socialist ideals and values". He also stated that Samoobrona wished to replace the capitalism of Balcerowicz with "a system that would satisfy human needs, that would prioritise man over labour and labour over capital, and would not be a system of the market but a system of social control over economic life through the state and trade unions"; Lepper admitted that this system would be socialist, but stressed the "indigenous", nationalist, "patriotic" and Catholic character of Samoobrona's socialism, one that was to be inspired by Catholic social teaching and agrarian-socialist pre-WW2 peasant movements.^[307] He also made remarks towards green socialism, sparking further questions about the nature of the party.^[308]

Lepper shocked the interviewers by stressing the environmentalist character of the party, explaining that he founded Samoobrona "because the spectre of economic and biological doom is staring us in the face". In the interview, he stated:

It is a personal dream of mine that we clean up this common Poland of ours, tidy up its roads, regulate its rivers, build reservoirs, remove dirt and rubbish dumps, broken fences, potholed pavements and derelict buildings - in short, take a serious and effective approach to the environment and ecology. Then we would all breathe easier. For these reasons, our Samoobrona movement is akin to the Greens, with whom we will gladly cooperate.

— Andrzej Lepper, Samoobrona - Dlaczego? Przed czym?, (Warsaw 1993), p. 42

Despite its agrarian character, Samoobrona also identified with the green movement, and environmentalists were an important part of Lepper's social and political circle; Samoobrona was founded not only by agrarian trade unions, but a minor Polish green party as well.^[309] Party's program promoted the concepts of "eco-development" and "econology", which were described as replacement of consumerism and materialism in favour of "a closer relationship with the natural environment, the preservation of small-scale family farms and a humane treatment of animals". Samoobrona stated that it desired to introduce new ways of thinking into Polish economics that would encompass ecology, social ethics and Catholic morality. Concrete environmentalist proposals included in the party's program were opposition to agroindustrial development and 'intensive farming methods'.^[310]

Rafal Soborski listed Samoobrona as an example of an anti-globalization environmentalist movement, using rhetoric aligned with green movements - Samoobrona attacked corporations for pursuing profit-driven policies that are harmful to both the environment and the well-being of the society. Both greens and Samoobrona considered international corporations responsible for global inequality and exploitation, imprisoning "the majority of people in impoverished enclaves [in order to] move production there". This anti-corporation rhetoric also had cultural and nationalist themes, as anti-globalization and ecological movements attacked the progressing "McDonaldization of society" that contradicted and threatened national and local identities. Samoobrona mixed environmentalist undertones with agrarian issues, accusing big companies of destroying Polish farming by flooding the Polish market with foreign, poor-quality products. The party campaigned for expelling foreign capital in Poland in order to protect native farms and local products.^[311]

In 1999, Samoobrona entered a coalition with the American-based Animal Welfare Institute against Smithfield Foods, American food company that wanted to enter the Polish market. After years of the neoliberal "shock therapy" that allowed foreign companies to outcompete Polish farms, the discontent of Polish farmers resulted in mass protests in 1999 organised by Samoobrona. The protests grew to 8000 protesting farmers and resulted in a total of 120 blockades. Samoobrona protesters became militant and clashed with the police, often resulting in confrontations which forced the police to use tear gas and water cannons. The Polish government capitulated to protesters' demands after a month, reforming its agricultural policy and imposing high tariffs on food imports. Surveys at the time showed that 75 percent of Polish population supported Samoobrona's protests, and the party continued its protests and decided to participate in the "Trojan Pig Tour" organised by AWI.^[312]

Lepper agreed to make anti-Smithfield lobbying a key plank of his presidential campaign, while also organising protests against Smithfield's expansion into the Polish market. While Lepper only won 3 percent of the popular vote in the 2000 Polish presidential election, he succeeded in setting the stage for Samoobrona's electoral success in 2001 parliamentary elections, and his anti-Smithfield campaigning mobilised Polish farmers against the company. Samoobrona organised a conference together with AWI in May 2000, promoting ecology and alternatives to industrial farming. At the same time, Samoobrona steadily incorporated more ecological and animal welfare themes into its program. Later in 2000, AWI-Samoobrona movement was endorsed by the president of Polish National Veterinary Chamber, Bartosz Winiecki, who recruited Polish veterinarians to the anti-Smithfield coalition. In the end, six thousands Polish doctors of veterinary medicine and twenty thousand veterinary technicians joined the coalition's protests.^[313]

Environmental activism of Samoobrona and AWI bore fruit in July 2000, when Polish Minister of Agriculture, Artur Balazs, declared that the government will oppose Smithfield's plans to introduce corporate farming in Poland. Smithfield conceded later that months, announcing that it was abandoning its plans to expand its activities into Poland. Samoobrona's activities proved crucial to bringing about a corporate farming ban in Poland; according to Joe Bandy and Jackie Smith, "the coalition between AWI and Samoobrona represents one of the successful cases in the emerging global justice movement".^[314] For his environmental activism, Lepper was awarded the Albert Schweitzer Medal in 2000. The leader of Samoobrona stated his commitment to animal welfare, stressing that animals must be treated "with respect, dignity and sympathy" and condemning modern meat industry as "concentration camps for animals".^[128]

Samoobrona was also supported by and collaborated with many minor environmentalist movements in Poland. It worked together with the Federation of the Greens (Polish: Federacja Zielonych), the eco-anarchist Federacja Anarchistyczna, as well as the eco-socialist Anticapitalist Offensive (Polish: Antykapitalistyczna Ofensywa). Common actions that these movements cooperated with Samoobrona with were anti-globalization as well as animal welfare protests.^[315] Polish ecologist journal The Green Brigades (Polish: Zielone Brygady) argued that the alliance of Samoobrona and environmentalists should be not seen as "exotic", as "it is the peasants and not the representatives of the McWorld on Poland from the only right parties who are our natural allies". In its statement endorsing the agrarian protests of Samoobrona, Federation of the Greens noted that the economic pressure applied on Polish farmers will exacerbate unemployment and housing shortages as the Polish countryside is already impoverished and lacks access to essential services such as sewerage, well-maintained roads, segregation systems, as well as education and healthcare. It urged environmentalists activists to solidarize with Polish farmers and not "divide trade unions into right and wrong", and to fight climate change and environmental destruction in alliance with the disadvantaged rather than for the "interests of the import lobby".^[316]

Election results

Presidential

Election year	Candidate	1st round		2nd round
		Votes	%	Votes	%
1995	Andrzej Lepper	235,797	1.3 (#9)	Endorsed Aleksander Kwaśniewski[317]
2000	Andrzej Lepper	537,570	3.1 (#5)	No second round
2005	Andrzej Lepper	2,259,094	15.1 (#3)	Endorsed Lech Kaczyński[318]
2010	Andrzej Lepper	214,657	1.3 (#7)	Opposed Jarosław Kaczyński[142]
2015				Endorsed Andrzej Duda[a]
2020				Endorsed Andrzej Duda[321]

Sejm

Election	Votes	%	Seats	+/–	Government
1991	3,247	0.1 (#70)	0 / 460	New	Extra-parliamentary
	As the Provincial Farmers' Self-Defence Committee.[2]
1993	383,967	2.8 (#12)	0 / 460		Extra-parliamentary
1997	10,073	0.1 (#14)	0 / 460		Extra-parliamentary
2001	1,327,624	10.2 (#3)	53 / 460	53	SLD-UP-PSL (2001-2003) (confidence and supply)[322]
					SLD-UP (2003-2004)
					SLD-UP-SDPL (2004-2005)
2005	1,347,355	11.4 (#3)	56 / 460	3	PiS Minority (2005-2006)
					PiS–SRP–LPR (2006-2007)
					PiS Minority (2007)
2007	247,335	1.5 (#5)	0 / 460	56	Extra-parliamentary
2011[b]	9,733	0.1 (#11)	0 / 460		Extra-parliamentary
2015[c]	4,266	0.1 (#15)	0 / 460		Extra-parliamentary
2019	5,448	0.1 (#20)	0 / 460		Extra-parliamentary
	As part of the Action of Disappointed Retirees and Pensioners.[323]
2023	Endorsed the 2023 Polish referendum.[163]

Senate

Election	Seats	+/–
1993	0 / 100	New
1997	0 / 100
2001	2 / 100	2
2005	3 / 100	1
2007	0 / 100	3
2011[b]	0 / 100
2015[c]	0 / 100
2019[c]	0 / 100
2023[d]	0 / 100

European Parliament

Election	Votes	%	Seats	+/–	EP Group
2004	656,782	10.78 (#4)	6 / 54	New	PES / UEN
2009	107,185	1.46 (#7)	0 / 50	6	–
2014[c]	2,729	0.04 (#12)	0 / 51	0	–
2019	Endorsed Social Justice Movement[324]
2024	260	0.00 (#10)	0 / 53	0	–
	A party member ran on the lists of the Repair Poland Movement.[183]

Regional assemblies

Election	%	Seats	+/–
1994	1.3		New
1998	15.1 (#3)	89 / 855	89
	As part of the Social Alliance.
2002	16.0 (#2)	101 / 561	12
2006	5.6 (#5)	37 / 561	64
2010	1.1 (#9)	0 / 561	37
2014[c]	0.3 (#17)	0 / 555
2018[c]	0.1 (#18)	0 / 552
2024[d]	0.9 (#8)	0 / 552

Leadership

• Andrzej Lepper (1992–2011)
• Andrzej Prochoń (2012)
• Lech Kuropatwiński (2012–2022)^[325]
• Krzysztof Prokopczyk (2022–incumbent)^[326]

Successors

Samoobrona had a profound influence on Polish politics and the party's populist rhetoric left a permanent mark on Polish political culture. Sociologist Remigiusz Okraska recalled: "Lepper was the sword that kept hovering over the heads of the complacent scoundrels of Warsaw and Krakow and reminded them - and all of us - that another world existed. A world of closed-down state-owned farms, small towns in decay, which are experiencing civilisational decline, closed-down factories, rural and urban poverty, hungry children and vegetating old people. It is largely thanks to him that today even the establishment media have stopped pretending that it is OK, that we are catching up and overtaking Europe, that there are no real, entrenched and growing social problems. Just 15 years ago, the same media only featured 'successful people' and the 'hard-working middle class' and a handful of 'choosing losers'."^[327] Similarly, historian Jarosław Tomasiewicz described Samoobrona as "plebeian left, organically growing out of the everyday problems of ordinary people" and a "genuinely popular movement, born of grassroots social struggles and not of ideological inspiration, a movement that did not need to 'stylise' itself and, like the mythological Antaeus of mother-earth, drew its power directly from the people."^[40] The surprising, dark-horse success of Samoobrona and its subsequent downfall continue to be a heavily researched and unique phenomenon in Polish politics, which gave birth to movements that would base themselves off Samoobrona and its rhetoric.^[40]

The party had also undergone a major change during its existence in terms of both public perception and ideology. The party started as a loose organization that engaged in a non-conventional and protest profile that brought together workers, the unemployed, pensioners and the poor; the party had both socialists and former communists along with military men and ultranationalists in its ranks.^[328] However, the party gradually eschewed its big-tent character in favour of a radically left-wing outlook, which led to Andrzej Lepper dismissing the nationalist wing of the party and calling for a "worker-peasant alliance" that envisioned Samoobrona cooperating together with other left-wing and post-communist parties. This made the party transition from a protest party to a consolidated, extreme-left party based on economic class rhetoric.^[329] Lepper would call for return to socialism during his 1999 presidential campaign, arguing that it had "not yet reached full maturity".^[330] Consequently, the international media came to see Lepper as "Polish Hugo Chávez", comparing and finding similarities with their socialist and populist rhetoric.^[331] By 2007, the party was considered to be on the extreme end of left-wing spectrum in Poland.^[230] This political and ideological transition, in addition to numerous scandals and conflicting decisions such as party's choice to cooperate with both left-wing (such as SLD and UP) and right-wing (PiS and LPR) parties resulted in multiple conflicts and splits within Samoobrona, with many dissident groups founding their own political parties.^[40] These include:

Parties based on Samoobrona

Name	Native name	Founded	Alignment	Comments
National Self-Defence Front	Front Narodowej Samoobrony	1994	Right-wing	Staunchly nationalist and right-wing movement founded by Janusz Bryczkowski, nationalist activist of Samoobrona expelled after his unsuccessful attempt to oust Andrzej Lepper from leadership. Dissolved in 1995.[332]
Polish Peasant Bloc	Polski Blok Ludowy	2003	Centrist	Agrarian and centrist faction led by Wojciech Mojzesowicz who left Samoobrona over its perceived turn to the left. The party disbanded in 2004 and joined right-wing populist Law and Justice.[333]
Self-Defence of the Polish Nation	Samoobrona Narodu Polskiego	2003	Right-wing	First long-lived Samoobrona split. Right-wing nationalist wing of the party that declared itself autonomous of the party in 2003 to protest Samoobrona's confidence and supply agreement with social democratic SLD and UP. Registered as a separate party in 2006 and ran an anti-capitalist campaign, but was struck off the ballot for trying to impersonate Samoobrona.[334] Changed its name to "Defence of the Polish Nation" and ran in elections until 2019, and dissolved itself in 2023.[335]
Polish Reason of State	Polska Racja Stanu	2003	Left-wing	Small parliamentary club turned a political party with diverse members. It dissolved in 2005 and most of its members went on to participate in Self-Defence Social Movement.[336]
Initiative of the Republic of Poland	Inicjatywa Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej	2004	Left-wing	Socialist split composed of two Łódź MPs. The party believed that "Samoobrona has a good programme, but it is not being implemented". Never participated in an election and was deregistered in 2010.[337]
Self-Defence Social Movement	Samoobrona Ruch Społeczny	2006	Left-wing	Local agrarian socialist faction within Samoobrona that focused on rural interests, and left the party over a conflict with the regional branch's leader Krzysztof Filipek. Dissolved in 2007 to join Self-Defence Rebirth.[338]
People's National Movement	Ruch Ludowo-Narodowy	2006	Centrist	Parliamentary club of MPs from Samoobrona and League of Polish Families (LPR) that protested the downfall of the PiS-Samoobrona-LPR coalition. It promptly dissolved to join Law and Justice after 3 months of existence.[339] It took its the name from the concept that Samoobrona pursued between 1999 and 2004, "The People's National Bloc" (Polish: Blok Ludowo-Narodowy), that envisioned an anti-neoliberal, economically left-wing coalition between Samoobrona, League of Polish Families, Polish People's Party and Polish Labour Party - August 80.[340]
Patriotic Self-Defence	Samoobrona Patriotyczna	2006	Right-wing	Nationalist party that accused Samoobrona of abandoning its nationalist rhetoric in favour of far-left slogans. It adopted a logo and program very similar to Samoobrona in order to divert its voters in the 2007 election, but it was struck off the ballot in most district and won 0.02% of the vote in total. It disbanded in 2013.[341]
Self-Defence Rebirth	Samoobrona Odrodzenie	2007	Left-wing	With its origins in a Catholic socialist wing of Samoobrona, Self-Defence Rebirth was founded in response to numerous scandals and electoral decline that rocked Samoobrona in 2007, and sought to unite all dissident Samoobrona parties under its banner. Following Andrzej Lepper's suicide in 2011, the party tried to rebuild the movement and described itself as "leftist but deeply religious".[342] After finding itself unable to rekindle the political movement of Samoobrona, it committed itself to rural trade unions and farmers' interests.[343]
Party of Regions	Partia Regionów	2007	Left-wing	Regionalist party highly critical of the centralized nature of Samoobrona. It was highly decentralized and had complex democratic party structures; the party was divided into regional branches highly autonomous of each other, with term-limited authorities elected by secret ballot. It called for decentralization and regionalization of Poland, stressing the importance of promoting and maintaining regional culture and patriotism rather than an 'all-Polish' one. The party had a principled leftist and socialist stance and ran on the party lists of Left Together.[344] It was dissolved in 2017.[345]
Radical Party of Oleh Liashko	Radykalna Partiia Oleha Liashka	2010	Left-wing	Ukrainian party known for its radical populism, combined with fiercely nationalist rhetoric and left-wing positions, especially on economics. While the party itself never referred to Polish Samoobrona nor its legacy, political observers nevertheless note that two parties are very similar, not only through their unique combination of radicalism, agrarianism, nationalism and left-wing populism, but also through political behavior - just like Samoobrona, the Radical Party of Oleh Liashko organizes protests that feature pitchforks as well as destruction of grain, together with radical demands.[346]
Social Movement of the Republic of Poland	Ruch Społeczny Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej	2015	Left-wing	A grassroots political party formed by the agricultural trade union OPZZ RiOR and led by Sławomir Izdebski, a former Samoobrona member, and Piotr Ikonowicz, a socialist activist who ran on the Samoobrona electoral lists in the 2007 parliamentary election.[347] The party aimed to become a direct successor to Samoobrona.[348] The party's goal was to "fight for the rights of various social groups harmed by neoliberal capitalism". It represented trade unionists, especially miners and farmers, as well as disability rights activists, unemployed, low-income workers and evicted tenants, and its electoral lists were exclusively composed of such groups.[349] However, the party was stillborn by the fact that it only managed to register electoral lists in three districts.[350]
Peasants' Party	Partia Chłopska	2018	Left-wing	Peasant movement party founded by former Samoobrona MPs such as Krzysztof Filipek during the 2018 drought that aspires to be a spiritual successor of Samoobrona. Strictly committed to rural interests, it has an agrarian socialist program very similar to that of Samoobrona. It ran on the party list of social democratic Democratic Left Alliance.[351] Committed itself to rural cooperatives after its failure in the 2019 Polish parliamentary election.[352]
AGROunion	AGROunia	2018	Left-wing	Founded by former member of Law and Justice Michał Kołodziejczak, who gained the reputation of 'second Lepper' by visiting his grave, paying tribute to him and promising to uphold Lepper's legacy in his speeches.[159] AGROunia invited several left-wing and feminist activists to its convention, and runs on an agrarian socialist platform.[353] It planned to form electoral alliance with Samoobrona in early August 2023, but it eventually chose to join the Civic Coalition instead.[160] Kołodziejczak won a seat in the 2023 Polish parliamentary election and became the Vice-Minister of Agriculture in the new government.[354]

Selbstverteidigung

Self-Defence Selbstverteidigung (German)
Abbreviation	SV
Leader	Heinz Klimczak[355]
Founded	23 August 2002[355]
Headquarters	Berlin[355]
Membership (2002)	2,000[356]
Ideology	Socialist populism[356] Anti-capitalism[357]
Political position	Left-wing to far-left[356]
Sister party	Self-Defence of the Republic of Poland[358]
Colors	Yellow   Sapphire
Slogan	Man, family, decent living and work[359] (Polish: Człowiek, rodzina, godne życie i praca}
Politics of Germany Political parties Elections

On 23 August 2002, a sister party of Samoobrona known as Self-Defence (German: Selbstverteidigung, SV) was founded in Berlin, Germany. It was created by the German businessman of Polish ancestry Heinz Klimczak, who invited Andrzej Lepper to participate in the founding congress of his party and stated that it would be explicitly modelled on the Polish Samoobrona.^[355] Lepper attended the founding congress and expressed his delight at how much his views and party had been appreciated and used by Selbstverteidigung. Lepper also stated he had already received similar applications from other Central European countries, and announced his plans to form a "Samoobrona Internationale", which would unite socialist populist countries across Europe.^[358]

Selbstverteidigung adopted the exact same status and program as Samoobrona, and was mainly composed of impoverished East German entrepreneurs, farmers and intellectuals. Klimczak stated that the party serves the "people left to their own devices, cheated by the state",^[358] and explained that the main reasons for the formation of the party in Germany is the very bad situation of the inhabitants of the eastern German states, especially the unemployed. Klimczak himself was a struggling construction entrepreneur and condemned the effects that the capitalist transformation of East German economy had on the poorer parts of the society.^[360] Selbstverteidigung decried the economic consequences of the German reunification and argued that it had caused massive layoffs, collapse of Eastern industries, extreme income inequality as well as poverty and hunger.^[355] The founding of the party and Lepper's participation were initially ignored by local Berlin media.^[361] However, the party soon organized public protests and hunger strikes in front of the Brandenburg Gate in Berlin.^[355]

Lepper stressed the anti-capitalist character of the party, and stated that the founders of the party had been in contact with Samoobrona for a long time. He praised the diverse nature of Selbstverteidigung, composed of struggling entrepreneurs but also farmers and intellectuals. The party noted the growing disproportion between the East Germany and the dominant Western states, and noted the inequal treatment not only on an economic level, but also cultural discrimination which instils the feeling of cultural inferiority amongst East Germans. Lepper also noted that the situation of East Germany is similar to the one of Poland which makes the program of Samoobrona applicable - much like Poland, East Germany had also gone through a transformation from a socialist system to a capitalist market economy, with the subsequent economic growth benefitting the very few while leaving behind millions of financially struggling and unemployed people.^[357] The main postulate of the party was to be protection of trade unions and protesting the capitalist transformation of East German states.^[360]

Selbstverteidiung used a left-wing and populist-socialist rhetoric that mimicked the one of Samoobrona, demanding a new economic system in Germany that would create conditions for "ordinary people to live with dignity", and decrying the capitalist order as one that divided society into "very poor and very rich". The party also stated that it seeks to protect the poorest, as well as the farmers and the middle class, from large corporations. It also proposed an establishment of an economic "third way", which would restore the positive aspects of the socialist East German system that now impoverished groups depended on, while avoiding the negative excesses. Selbstverteidiung accentuated that the economy should be based on the principle of prioritizing "the human being, the family, a decent life and work".^[359]

In its statement on Selbstverteidigung party, Samoobrona stated that it will support its sister party while also respecting its autonomy and the unique East German conditions, which are nevertheless similar to the Polish situation.^[357] Selbstverteidigung was planning to gather at least 10,000 members within 3 months, and contest the 2002 German federal election.^[358] However, criminal proceedings were initiated against the party's leader, Heinz Klimczak.^[355] After Klimczak was accused of economic fraud, Samoobrona decided to keep its communication with its German sister party private, which made the topic disappear from the headlines.^[356] The fate of the Selbstverteidigung is unknown. Klimczak was released in December 2002 and stated that the fraud charges were connected to a business partner that Selbstverteidigung wanted to cooperate with.^[362] In 2004, Klimczak founded a company in Oberschöneweide that sells traditional Polish delicacies.^[363] Andrzej Lepper also developed ties in the Czech Republic, where an attempt to develop a Czech sister party of Samoobrona was made.^[364]

See also

• AGROunia
• League and Self-Defense
• Party of Regions
• Patriotic Self-Defence
• Peasants' Party
• Self-Defence Rebirth
• Self-Defence Social Movement
• Self-Defence of the Polish Nation

Notes

1. Self-Defence Rebirth functioning as the de facto successor party of Samoobrona endorsed Andrzej Duda,^[319] while Samoobrona itself attacked President Komorowski for "acting against the Polish national interest."^[320]
2. As Our Home Poland – Andrzej Lepper's Self-Defence
3. As Self-Defence
4. As both Self-Defence and Self-Defence of the Republic of Poland, with two separate lists

1. Some media considered the party right-wing or far-right as to compare Samoobrona to another anti-establishment party League of Polish Families.^[16][17] This is rejected by the majority of political scientists - Radosław Markowski criticized the media for incorrectly labelling Samoobrona, arguing that "They are not in most respects 'on the right'. They are in many respects, 'on the left'."^[18] Tim Bale also clarified: "Some commentators have categorised the agrarian-populist Self-Defence (Samoobrona) party, led by the controversial farmers’ union leader Andrzej Lepper, as a right-wing or radical right party. While there were clearly right-wing nationalist-populist elements in Self-Defence’s programme and discourse, its primary appeal was as a left-wing socialist agrarian-populist party."^[19]
   Political scientists, such as Sarah de Lange, Gerrit Voerman,^[20] Rafał Pankowski,^[21] Krzysztof Kowalczyk,^[22] Marek Migalski,^[23] Remigiusz Okraska,^[24] Paul G. Lewis and Zdenka Mansfeldová,^[25] Andrzej Antoszewski,^[26] Karol Kostrzębski,^[27] Marek Barański^[28] and Mateusz Piskorski,^[29] classified the party as left-wing. The party described itself as the "socialist left",^[30] and declared that "the traditions from which Samoobrona draws are the pre-war Polish Socialist Party and the Polish People's Party Wyzwolenie".^[31]
   Samoobrona competed with left-wing parties, such as the SLD and UP, for voters rather than right-wing ones,^[32] and Andrzej Lepper said: "I set myself the goal of convincing the left-wing electorate in such a way that they understand that the only left-wing, pro-social and patriotic party at the moment is Self-Defence."^[33] Lepper also stated: "I have always been and will always be a man of the left."^[34] He described his party as "the patriotic left, a progressive left, modern, tolerant, without any extremes or deviations".^[35] Comparing the voter bases of Samoobrona and LPR, Pankowski noted that Samoobrona voters were characterised by low income and anti-capitalist values, while the LPR ones were very religious and prioritised nationalist values.^[36] Additionally, it was speculated that Samoobrona might take over the place of the SLD as the main Polish left-wing party.^[37]
   The party is considered to have transformed from a "traditional protest party" into a "stabilised left-wing party" by 2005,^[38][39] and Samoobrona invited left-wing politicians, such as Piotr Ikonowicz and Leszek Miller, to its electoral lists.^[29] According to Jarosław Tomasiewicz, the party's decision to form a government with the right-wing PiS and LPR was not a shift to the right but an attempt to replace SLD as the largest Polish left-wing party. Samoobrona started cooperating with left-wing parties, such as the DPL, RLP, and KPEiR.^[40]
   That the party continued and even doubled down on its left-wing rhetoric despite forming a right-wing government, which led to defections of some right-leaning members to LPR, while others seceded to found the Polish Peasant Bloc instead. It also led to the failure of the League and Self-Defense merger proposal.^[40]
   It was reported that the left-wing identity of Samoobrona warded off nationalists circles, hitherto considered friendly towards Samoobrona. Roman Giertych and his League of Polish Families rejected a possibility of entering a coalition with Lepper's party, citing Samoobrona's left-wing alignment and its support for same-sex partnerships as the reason.^[41]
   Samoobrona was also considered to be the party closest aligned with the fallen pre-1989 Communist regime; Samoobrona was called "probably the only political party that speaks well of Communist Poland" by Mirosław Karwat,^[42] while Piotr Długosz considers the party an "heir of the communist regime".^[43] Sławomir Drelich says that Samoobrona portrayed Communist Poland as superior to the post-1989 capitalist one, and calls the party "the most post-communist party on the Polish political scene".^[44] A 2003 survey by CBOS found that the majority of party's supporters wished Poland could have retained Communist economy.^[45]
   A 2005 survey of Samoobrona members found that over 50% of the party members identified as left-wing politically, while 26% members identified as right-wing.^[46] According to Mirosława Grabowska, both the voters and members of Samoobrona were much closer to the SLD than PiS or LPR politically.^[47]
2. Multiple sources:
   

   • Paul G. Lewis; Zdenka Mansfeldová (2007). "12.3 The role of the European issue". The European Union and Party Politics in Central and Eastern Europe. Palgrave Macmillan. p. 242. doi:10.1057/9780230596658. ISBN 9780230596658. In the largest group of countries (Slovakia, Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland and, more recently, Estonia) Eurosceptic parties appear on both the right-wing nationalist (SNS, MIÉP, Ataka, LPR, to some extent ODS) and radical left (KSČM, Hungarian Labour Party, Association of Workers of Slovakia, Communist Party of Slovakia, Self-Defence) ends of the party spectrum.
   • Andrzej Antoszewski [in Polish] (2005). Partie polityczne Europy Środkowej i Wschodniej (in Polish). Poznań-Wrocław: Wyższa Szkoła Zarządzania i Bankowości w Poznaniu. p. 180. ISBN 83-88544-63-2. Jedyne ugrupowanie ekstremalnej lewicy, które nie jest formacją neokomunistyczną, to polska Samoobrona. W wielu momentach jej program gospodarczy, akcentujący głównie konieczność powstrzymania prywatyzacji oraz ochronę narodowych interesów, jest zbieżny z postulatami partii neokomunistycznych. [The only grouping of the extreme left that is not a neo-communist formation is the Polish Samoobrona. At many points, its economic programme, which mainly emphasises the need to stop privatisation and to protect national interests, coincides with the demands of neo-communist parties.]
   • Ryszard Herbut [in Polish]; Andrzej Antoszewski [in Polish] (2007). Systemy polityczne współczesnej Europy (in Polish). Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN. p. 102. ISBN 978-83-011-4622-1. W niektórych elekcjach wzięły udział także inne partie, które mogą być określone mianem skrajnej lewicy. Mamy tu na myśli Związek Robotników Słowacji (ZRS), ukraińską Progresywną Partię Socjalistyczną (SPS) oraz polską Samoobronę. [Other parties that can be described as extreme left also took part in some elections. We are referring to the Union of Workers of Slovakia (ZRS), the Ukrainian Progressive Socialist Party (SPS) and the Polish Self-Defence.]
   • Krzysztof Jasiewicz; Agnieszka Jasiewicz-Betkiewicz (2007). "Poland". European Journal of Political Research. 46 (6–7). European Consortium for Political Research: 1069. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6765.2007.00752.x. In its public statements, Self-Defense has been critical (often harshly) of the legacies of both communism and Solidarity, yet among its leaders there are several individuals formerly associated with the communist regime. Its support for state interventionism and opposition to market mechanisms place it on the political far left.
   • Madalena Pontes Meyer Resende (2004). An Ethos Theory of Party Positions on European Integration: Poland and Beyond (PDF). ProQuest LLC. p. 159. However, an analysis of the evolution of the last years makes it apparent that the party identity is mainly based on a radical conception of economic class and is constituted by those heavily disadvantaged by the transition. The Samoobrona can therefore be classified as an extreme-left party.
   • Agata Górny; Aleksandra Grzymała-Kazłowska; Piotr Koryś; Agnieszka Weinar (December 2003). "Multiple citizenship in Poland" (PDF). Prace Migracyjne. 53 (1). Institute for Social Studies Warsaw University: 45. We did not consider the populist far-left (Samoobrona) and the nationalistic far right wing (LPR) nor the Polish Peasants' Party: PSL. There were many reasons for such a decision. None of the two extreme parties had representatives in the parliament of the 3rd term, when the debate over citizenship reached its peak.
   • Kovalov, Maksym (2013). "The Effects of Populism on Democratic Quality in the Czech Republic, Poland and Ukraine". OU - Dissertations (9437). Norman, Oklahoma: The University of Oklahoma: 57. The radical left parties represent traditional agrarian populism, such as Self Defense (Samoobrona) in Poland.
   • Manó Gábor Tóth (2008). "Carrot and Stick: The Prospect of EU Membership as a Motive in States in Transition" (PDF). Interns Yearbook. Skopje: Analytica: 66. The right-wing Law and Justice Party formed a minority government in Poland after the 2005 elections, and formed a majority government next year in coalition with the provincial far-left Self Defence Party and the xenophobic far-right League of Polish Families, having the Kaczyński twin brothers as president and prime minister.
   • Vladimír Naxera; Viktor Glied; Ondřej Filipec; Małgorzata Kaczorowska (October 2020). ""To protect national sovereignty from the EU?" The 2019 EP elections and populist parties in V4 countries" (PDF). UNISCI Journal. 54 (1): 76. doi:10.31439/unisci-98. ISSN 2386-9453. These include, first and foremost, extreme-left Self-Defense (Samoobrona Rzeczpospolitej Polskiej, SO, Self-Defense) and the League of Polish Families (Liga Polskich Rodzin, LPR).
   • Derrick M. Nault; Bei Dawei; Evangelos Voulgarakis; Rab Paterson; Cesar Andres-Miguel Suva (2013). Experiencing Globalization: Religion in Contemporary Contexts. Anthem Press. p. 143. ISBN 978-0857285591. It is important to note that the PiS grew increasingly populist after 2005, when the party entered into a coalition with the LPR and the populist extreme-left Self-Defense.
   • Marsh, Michael; Mikhaylov, Slava; Schmitt, Hermann (2007). European Elections after Eastern Enlargement: Preliminary Results from the European Election Study 2004. CONNEX Report Series No 01. Mannheim: Mannheim Centre for European Social Research (MZES). p. 244. ISSN 1864-1539. The 2001 election was the first that Samoobrona, now Samoobrona Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej (SRP), contested as a party. It can be labeled as a radical populist-left party, as it predominantly concentrates on economic and socio-economic issues.
   • Musiałowska, Ewa (2008). "Political Reporting in Poland: What Has Changed over The Last Decade?" (PDF). Communicating for Social Impact. 58th Annual Conference of the International Communication Association (ICA). Montreal, Quebec: International Communication Association. p. 4. Self-Defense is a radical left-wing grouping that emerged on the wave of distrust to Polish political elites.
   • Kristina Mikulova (2012). "Missionary Zeal of Recent Converts": Norms and Norm Entrepreneurs in the Foreign Policy of the Czech Republic, Poland and Slovakia 1989-2011. University of Oxford. pp. 229–230. Apart from the relatively rare individual cases in the mainstream, opposition to the Polish forces' participation in the Iraq War mainly rested with parties on the fringes of the political spectrum: the far-right League of Polish Families (LPR) and far-left Self-Defense (Samooborona) [sic].
   • Rekawek, Kacper; Renard, Thomas; Molas, Bàrbara (2024). Russia and the Far-Right: Insights from Ten European Countries (PDF). The Hague: International Centre for Counter-Terrorism (ICCT) Press. p. 316. doi:10.19165/2024.1563. ISBN 9789083419916. ISSN 2468-0486. Together with Mateusz Piskorski, a longtime stalwart of the pro-Russia scene in Poland, and a former parliamentarian with the far-left and populist Samoobrona (Self-Defence) party, they also ran the YouTube channel Die Guten Menschen! until 2021, the recordings of which were repeatedly shared by Dugin on his now-defunct Facebook fan page.
   • Cristóbal Rovira Kaltwasser; Paul Taggart; Paulina Ochoa Espejo; Pierre Ostiguy (26 October 2017). The Oxford Handbook of Populism. Oxford Handbooks. Oxford University Press. p. 193. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198803560.001.0001. ISBN 9780192525376. On the radical left, Poland's Self Defence (Samoobrona Rzeczpospolitej Polskiej, SRP) party exploited rising public discontent with the politics and politicians of transition to enter parliament as the third largest party in 2001.
   • Eckhard Jesse; Tom Thieme (2011). Extremismus in den EU-Staaten (in German) (1 ed.). VS Verlag. p. 450. ISBN 978-3-531-17065-7. Zehn linksextremistische Parteien zogen von 1994 an ins Europaparlament ein, von denen die meisten – mit Ausnahme der polnischen Samoobrona – in ihren Wahlergebnissen relativ stabil blieben. [Ten left-wing extremist parties entered the European Parliament from 1994 onwards, most of which - with the exception of the Polish Samoobrona - remained relatively stable in their election results.]
3. The colour of the party's flag,^[49][50] also seen as a main colour in party's conferences.^[51]

References

1. Seongcheol Kim (2022). Discourse, Hegemony, and Populism in the Visegrád Four. Routledge Studies in Extremism and Democracy. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-003-18600-7. Just as the UP's populism was receding in favor of a "left" vs. "right" logic, another anti-liberal populist challenge – albeit coming from a nationalist direction – gained heightened prominence as the Self-Defense of the Republic of Poland (SRP, or "Samoobrona" for short) entered parliament for the first time with over 10% of the vote in the 2001 elections.
2. Walkiewicz, Leszek (14 May 2021). "Jak na ziemi darłowskiej rodziła się "Samoobrona" (część pierwsza)". darlowo.pl (in Polish). Archiwum Urzędu Miejskiego w Darłowie.
3. Kuczur, Tomasz (2006). "Związek Zawodowy Rolnictwa "Samoobrona" i Partia Przymierze "Samoobrona" – usytuowanie wobec ugrupowań o proweniencji ludowej w latach 1992–1993 i zarys myśli politycznej". Athenaeum. Polskie Studia Politologiczne (in Polish). 14–15. Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek: 237–250. doi:10.15804/athena.2006.15.14 (inactive 1 November 2024).{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: DOI inactive as of November 2024 (link)
4. Lisiakiewicz, Rafał (2014). "Miejsce Samoobrony RP w typologii partii politycznych". Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego W Krakowie (in Polish). 2 (926): 37–54. doi:10.15678/ZNUEK.2014.0926.0203. ISSN 1898-6447.
5. "Samoobrona Rzeczpospolitej Polskiej". newsweek.pl (in Polish). 21 May 2010.
6. Marcin Kowalski; Aleksandra Szyłło (3 August 2012). "Sieroty po Samoobronie". wyborcza.pl (in Polish). Retrieved 23 August 2023. Pełnomocniczka Leppera prosiła, by członkowie partii pomogli spłacić długi. Jeszcze niedawno było ich 100 tys. [Lepper's attorney asked party members to help pay off debts. Until recently, there were 100,000.]
7. Ania Krok-Paszkowska; Petr Kopecky; Cas Mudde (2003). "Samoobrona: The Polish Self-Defence Movement". Uncivil Society? Contentious Politics in Post-Communist Europe. Routledge. pp. 115–116. ISBN 9780203988787. The trade union has about 500,000 members (Samoobrona Narodu July 2000); in comparison, the Solidarity trade union had a membership of 1.5 million in 1996. Samoobrona also has hundreds of thousands of sympathisers in the country.
8. • Gerrit Voerman [in Dutch]; Dirk Strijker; Ida Terluin (2015). "Contemporary Populism, the Agrarian and the Rural in Central Eastern and Western Europe". In Sarah de Lange [in Dutch] (ed.). Rural Protest Groups and Populist Political Parties. Wageningen Academic Publishers. p. 172. doi:10.3920/978-90-8686-807-0. ISBN 9789086862597.  - Listed as "agrarian/socialist".
   • Krzysztof Kowalczyk; Jerzy Sielski (2006). Partie i ugrupowania parlamentarne III Rzeczypospolitej (in Polish). Dom Wydawniczy DUET. p. 187. ISBN 978-83-89706-84-3. Posługując się powszechnie stosowaną na gruncie rodzimej politologii klasyfikacją partii politycznych R. Herbuta, Samoobronę RP umiejscowić można w rodzinach partii agrarnych i komunistycznych (biorąc pod uwagę ewolucję apelu wyborczego partii w ostatnich latach). [Using the classification of political parties commonly used in Polish political science by R. Herbut, Self-Defence of the Republic of Poland can be placed in the families of agrarian and communist parties (taking into account the evolution of the party's electoral appeal in recent years).]
   • Lisiakiewicz, Rafał (2014). "Miejsce Samoobrony RP w typologii partii politycznych". Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego W Krakowie (in Polish). 2 (926): 39–41. ISSN 1898-6447. Partia A. Leppera przedstawiała się jako „prawdziwa lewica", natomiast teoretycy określali ją jako socjalistyczną czy lewicowo-socjalistyczną. (...) Te dane przekładały się także na program ugrupowania, w którym można dostrzec zarówno wpływy agraryzmu, jak i doktryn skrajnie lewicowych. [The party of A. Lepper presented itself as the 'true left', while theoreticians described it as socialist or left-socialist. (...) These data were also translated into the grouping's programme, in which both agrarianism and far-left doctrines can be noted.]
   • Przyłęcki, Paweł (2012). Populizm w polskiej polityce: Analiza dyskursu polityki (in Polish). Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Sejmowe. p. 133. ISBN 9788376661858. Samoobrona (...) czerpie swoje źródło z ideologii agraryzmu, nacjonalizmu, a także socjalizmu. [Samoobrona (...) draws its origin from the ideologies of agrarianism, nationalism, as well as socialism.]
9. • Igor Guardiancich (October 2009). Pension Reforms in Central, Eastern and Southeastern Europe. From Post-Socialist Transition to the Global Financial Crisis (PDF). Florence: Taylor & Francis Ltd. p. 133. doi:10.2870/1700. ISBN 978-0415688987. Archived from the original (PDF) on 4 October 2023.  - Listed as "Christian socialist".
   • Moes, Jeroen (5 December 2008). CosmoPoles: Shifting boundaries in the identification with Europe. Radboud University Nijmegen. p. 55.  - Classified as a "Christian socialist" party.
   • Popić, Tamara (24 November 2014). Policy Learning, Fast and Slow: Market-Oriented Reforms of Czech and Polish Healthcare Policy, 1989-2009 (PDF) (Doctor of Political and Social Sciences thesis). Florence: European University Institute. p. 180.  - Described as 'Christian socialist'.
   • Kösemen, Orkan (19 January 2005). Institutioneller Wandel und europäische Integration: Der Einfluß des EU-Beitrittsprozesses auf die Politikgestaltung in Polen, Tschechien und Ungarn (PDF) (Doctor of Philosophy thesis) (in German). Institut für Sozialwissenschaften. p. 81. Lepper änderte seine Strategie 1999 als er begann, seine radikalen Attacken gegenüber dem politischen Establishment mit einer eigenen, wenn auch sehr verschwommenen, Programmatik zu untermauern, die sich gezielt an die Transformationsverlierer wendete: Die anti-liberal, anti-westlich, anti-kosmopolitisch und antimarktwirtschaftlichen Grundströmungen werden zu einem Konzept des „Dritten Weges" zusammengefaßt. Dieser „dritte Weg" wird mit der katholischen Soziallehre bereichert und gegen Kommunismus und Kapitalismus in Stellung gebracht. Neben dieser Quasiideologie, die am ehesten als „christlicher Sozialismus" bezeichnet werden kann... [Lepper changed his strategy in 1999 when he began to underpin his radical attacks against the political establishment with his own, albeit blurred, program, which was specifically aimed at the losers of the transition: the anti-liberal, anti-Western, anti-cosmopolitan and anti-market basic currents are combined into a concept of the "Third Way". This "third way" is enriched with Catholic social teaching and positioned against communism and capitalism. In addition to this quasi-ideology, which can best be described as 'Christian socialism'...]
   • Fras, Maksymilian (October 2012). The Catholic Church, Religion and Politics in Post-Communist Poland: Secularisation and Republicisation 1989-2007 (PDF) (Doctor of Philosophy thesis). The Open University. pp. 187–188. doi:10.21954/ou.ro.0000f129. The same applied to Andrzej Lepper, a farmer turned political revolutionary, and later deputy prime minister in Jaroslaw Kaczynski's government (see Chapter 5). Lepper founded Self-Defence ('Samoobrona', SO), a trade union and political party, in January 1992. His programme was a mixture of socialist and etatist economic policies with populist slogans. Even though Lepper most often praised the communist period as the golden era of Polish farming, and criticised the free market, his rhetoric was full of references to Church, Catholicism and national identity: 'One cannot imagine Polish national culture without (...) Catholicism. It is the Church that allowed us, Poles, to defend our national identity' (U11993). Lepper often quoted John Paul IPs remark that capitalism cannot be the only alternative to communism, and declared that wanting to 'be a Christian in Samoobronas activities means (...) to refer to the social ramifications of the Gospel and papal teachings' (U11993).
   • Eckhard Jesse; Tom Thieme (2011). Extremismus in den EU-Staaten (in German) (1 ed.). VS Verlag. pp. 292–294/463. ISBN 978-3-531-17065-7. Im Programm von Samoobrona wurde das Hauptaugenmerk auf Wirtschaftsfragen gelegt. Die linke Orientierung der SRP zeigt sich in der Verurteilung kapitalistischer Marktwirtschaft und der Forderung nach sozialer Gleichheit. Das Verhältnis zu anderen Fragen der Auslandspolitik, wie z. B. die negative Einschätzung der NATO-Intervention im Kosovo, machen die SRP zum potenziellen Verbündeten der national-katholischen Gruppen. (...) Lepper betont auch, gläubiger Katholik zu sein, und die von ihm geleitete Organisation werde „durch die Hinweise der Kirche und die Behauptungen und Botschaften von Johannes Paul II. voll unterstützt". (...) Ideologisch lassen sich vielfältige Linksextremismusvarianten unterscheiden. Anti- bzw. nichtkommunistische Parteien wie Polens Landarbeitergewerkschaft Samoobrona und die ethnoregionalistische Sinn Féin in Irland stellen Ausnahmen dar. Ihre sozialistischen Gesellschaftsutopien beruhen auf der Verbindung von solidarischer Gesellschaft und nationaler Identität, was zu ideologischen Überschneidungen mit rechtsextremen Parteien führen kann. [In the Samoobrona program, the main focus was on economic issues. The left orientation of the SRP is reflected in the condemnation of capitalist market economy and the demand for social equality. The relationship to other issues of foreign policy, such as the negative assessment of the NATO intervention in Kosovo, make the SRP a potential associate of the national Catholic groups. (...) Lepper also stresses that he is a devout Catholic and that the party he leads "fully supports the instructions of the Church and the assertions and messages of John Paul II". (...) Ideologically, a variety of left-wing extremist variants can be distinguished. Anti- or non-communist parties such as Poland's farmers' union Samoobrona and the ethno-regionalist Sinn Féin in Ireland are exceptions. Their socialist ideals are based on the combination of a society of solidarity and national identity, which can lead to ideological overlaps with far-right parties.]
10. • Mateusz Piskorski [in Polish] (2010). Samoobrona RP w polskim systemie partyjnym (in Polish) (Dissertation ed.). Poznań: Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań. p. 380. Pozycja Samoobrony miała stanowić szeroką formułę lewicowości, obejmującą lewicę katolicką, zjednoczone dążeniem do osiągnięcia fundamentalnych celów. [The Samoobrona position was intended to be a broad formula of leftism, encompassing the Catholic left, united by the pursuit of fundamentalist goals.]
    • Rudolf von Thadden; Anna Hofmann (24 January 2024). Populismus in Europa - Krise der Demokratie?. Genshagener Gespräche (in German). Vol. 7. Wallstein-Verlag. p. 34. ISBN 978-3-89244-944-7. In einem ihrer programmatischen Dokumente bezeichnet sich die Samoobrona selbst als sozial und christlich orientierte, volks-nationale gesellschaftliche Bewegung, was gut das Durcheinander widerspiegelt, das bei dem Versuch entsteht, Parteien zu klassifizieren, die sich populistischer Formen bedienen. Die Samoobrona ist jedoch eher der linken Seite des polnischen politischen Spektrums zuzurechnen. Ihr personalisierter Feind ist gegenwärtig der Präsident der Polnischen Nationalbank, Leszek Balcerowicz, den die Partei als den Hauptverantwortlichen für die Armut eines großen Teils der polnischen Gesellschaft ansieht. [In one of its programmatic documents, Samoobrona describes itself as a socially and Christian-oriented, popular-national social movement, which reflects well the confusion that arises when trying to classify parties that use populist forms. However, Samoobrona is on the left side of the Polish political spectrum. Its personalised enemy is currently the president of the National Bank of Poland, Leszek Balcerowicz, whom the party sees as the main culprit for the poverty of a large part of Polish society.]
    • Wojciechowski, Krzysztof (2018). Determinanty debaty politycznej nad kierunkami rozwoju oświaty w Polsce po 1989 roku (Doctor of Political Science thesis) (in Polish). Poznań. p. 379. Samoobrona Rzeczpospolitej Polskiej pochodzi od Samoobrony Leppera. Założona została 10 stycznia 1992 roku a zarejestrowana 12 czerwca 1992 roku. Swoimi korzeniami sięgała Związku Zawodowego Rolników „Samoobrona", Związku Zawodowego Metalowców, Partii Przymierza „Samoobrona" oraz Partii Zielonych. Przywódcą do czasu samobójczej śmierci w 2011 roku był Andrzej Lepper. Jest to organizacja będąca mieszanką ideologii narodowo-lewicowej, chrześcijańsko-lewicowej, socjaldemokratycznej, chrześcijańsko-socjalistycznej, nacjonalistycznej, narodowo-katolickiej i agrarnej. [Samoobrona Rzeczpospolitej Polskiej is derived from Lepper's Samoobrona. It was founded on 10 January 1992 and registered on 12 June 1992. Its roots were in the Farmers' Trade Union "Samoobrona", the Metalworkers' Trade Union, the Przymierze "Samoobrona" Party and the Green Party. The leader until his suicidal death in 2011 was Andrzej Lepper. It is a party that is a compound of national-left, Christian-left, social-democratic, Christian-socialist, nationalist, National Catholic and agrarian ideologies.]
11. • Andrzej Lepper (1993). Samoobrona - Dlaczego? Przed czym? (in Polish). Warsaw: Wyraz. p. 42. ISBN 9788390010021. Osobistym mym marzeniem jest, abyśmy tę naszą wspólną Polskę dobrze posprzątali, uporządkowali jej drogi, uregulowali rzeki, zbudowali zbiorniki wodne, stowane rudery, słowem - poważnie i skutecznie wzięli się za środowisko naturalne i ekologię. Wtedy lżej by nam było wszystkim oddychać. Z tych też powodów nasz ruch Samoobrony bliski jest Zielonym, z którymi chętnie będziemy współpracowali. [It is a personal dream of mine that we clean up this common Poland of ours, tidy up its roads, regulate its rivers, build reservoirs, remove dirt and rubbish dumps, broken fences, potholed pavements and derelict buildings - in short, take a serious and effective approach to the environment and ecology. Then we would all breathe easier. For these reasons, our Samoobrona movement is akin to the Greens, with whom we will gladly cooperate.]
    • Ania Krok-Paszkowska; Petr Kopecky; Cas Mudde (2003). "Samoobrona: The Polish Self-Defence Movement". Uncivil Society? Contentious Politics in Post-Communist Europe. Routledge. p. 114. ISBN 9780203988787. Samoobrona also argues for materialism and consumerism to be replaced by a closer relationship with the natural environment, the preservation of small-scale family farms and a humane treatment of animals. There is frequent reference to 'eco-development' and a fuzzy concept: 'Econology' (Ekonologia), described in the programme as a new way of thinking drawing on theories of social systems, ecology, and social ethics and morality in politics and economics. More concretely, it is against agroindustrial development and intensive farming methods.
    • Mateusz Piskorski [in Polish] (2010). Samoobrona RP w polskim systemie partyjnym (in Polish) (Dissertation ed.). Poznań: Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań. pp. 60, 362. W skład komitetu założycielskiego wchodzili przede wszystkim działacze ZZR „Samoobrona" z A. Lepperem na czele, a także członkowie Związku Zawodowego Metalowców oraz grupa aktywistów Polskiej Partii Zielonych, stojących na stanowisku ekologizmu i pacyfizmu. (...) Współpracę z Samoobroną podjęło przede wszystkim krakowskie środowisko Federacji Zielonych, z którym związani byli znani działacze ekologiczni A. Żwawa (redaktor naczelny magazynu „Zielone Brygady") oraz O. Swolkień. [The founding committee consisted mainly of activists from the Self-Defence Trade Union headed by A. Lepper, as well as members of the Metal Workers' Trade Union and a group of activists from the Polish Green Party, standing for environmentalism and pacifism. (...) Cooperation with Samoobrona was undertaken first and foremost by the Kraków environment of the Federation of Greens, with which well-known environmental activists A. Żwawa (editor-in-chief of the magazine Zielone Brygady) and O. Swolkień were associated.]
    • Wojciechowski, Krzysztof (2018). Determinanty debaty politycznej nad kierunkami rozwoju oświaty w Polsce po 1989 roku (Doctor of Political Science thesis) (in Polish). Poznań. p. 333, 379. Samoobrona Leppera była to nazwa ruchu społeczno-politycznego, w którego skład weszli rolnicy, organizacje społeczne i zawodowe skupiające robotników, bezrobotnych, rencistów, środowiska oświaty i kultury, pracowników sfery budżetowej oraz ekologów. (...) Samoobrona Rzeczpospolitej Polskiej pochodzi od Samoobrony Leppera. Założona została 10 stycznia 1992 roku a zarejestrowana 12 czerwca 1992 roku. Swoimi korzeniami sięgała Związku Zawodowego Rolników „Samoobrona", Związku Zawodowego Metalowców , Partii Przymierza „Samoobrona" oraz Partii Zielonych. [Lepper's Samoobrona was the name of a socio-political movement that included farmers, social and professional organisations bringing together workers, the unemployed, pensioners, educational and cultural circles, budget workers and environmentalists. (...) Samoobrona Rzeczpospolitej Polskiej originated from Lepper's Samoobrona. It was founded on 10 January 1992 and registered on 12 June 1992. Its origins were in the 'Samoobrona' farmers' trade union, the 'Samoobrona' metalworkers' trade union, the 'Samoobrona' Alliance Party and the Green Party.]
12. • March, Luke [in Spanish] (2011). "Left-wing Populism: Populist Socialists and Social Populists". Radical Left Parties in Europe. Routledge. p. 143. ISBN 9780203154878.
    • Sławomir Czech; Maciej Kassner (12 July 2012). "Counter-movement at a critical juncture: A neo-Polanyian interpretation of the rise of the illiberal Right in Poland". Intersections. East European Journal of Society and Politics. 7 (2). Centre for Social Sciences: 137. doi:10.17356/ieejsp.v7i2.733. Neoliberalism was vigorously challenged by the aforementioned rural-populist Self-Defense.
    • Przemysław Wielgosz (22 November 2005). "The choice of refusal". internationalviewpoint.org. Trybuna. But the effectiveness of the social phraseology of the PiS and the high score registered by the clearly anti-neoliberal Samoobrona, only represent the tip of the iceberg.
    • Richard Saull; Alexander Anievas; Neil Davidson; Adam Fabry (2015). The Longue Durée of the Far-Right: An international historical sociology. Routledge. p. 183. ISBN 978-1-315-76764-2. Lepper's support emerged at first mainly from farmers, unable to compete with cheap imports of foreign grain. SO began by blockading roads and sabotaging grain imports, and Lepper rapidly realised the political mileage available from anti- neoliberal rhetoric directed against the political elite.
    • Feffer, John (2017). Aftershock: A Journey into Eastern Europe's Broken Dreams. Zed Books Ltd. p. 202. ISBN 978-1-78360-950-5. Samoobrona was defined largely by its negative positions: against neoliberalism, against the EU, against ruling elites, against the urban intellectual bias of Polish politics.
13. • Jane C. Desmond; Virginia R. Domínguez (2017). Global Perspectives on the United States Pro-Americanism, Anti-Americanism, and the Discourses Between. University of Illinois Press. p. 87. ISBN 9780252099335. The antiglobalization forces exemplified by Andrzej Lepper's Samoobrona (Self-defense) party have also made a strong showing in recent elections.
    • Lang, Kai-Olaf (2005). "Populism in Central and Eastern Europe - A Threat to Democracy or just Political Folklore?". Populism East and West. Slovak Foreign Policy Affairs. 6 (1). Research Center of the Slovak Foreign Policy Association: 11. Taking into account Lepper's anti-market, anti-globalization rhetoric and his positive assessment of the Gierek-era, i.e. the 1970s in Poland, Samoobrona could also be categorized as leftist populism.
    • Nikolaus Werz [in German] (30 April 2003). Populismus: Populisten in Übersee und Europa. Analysen (in German). Vol. 79 (1 ed.). VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften Wiesbaden. p. 167. ISBN 978-3-663-11110-8. Die Samoobrona verfügt nach den letzten Parlamentswahlen über 53 Sejmabgeordnete und zwei Senatoren. Ihr Führer, der 47-jährige Landwirt Andrzej Lepper, lehnt die Globalisierung ab, kritisiert die freie Marktwirtschaft und schlägt protektionistische, sozialistische und nationalistische Töne an. Zu verzeichnen sind auch manche prorussische Tendenzen sowie eine spürbare Nostalgie für die Volksrepublik Polen. Lepper ist ein Gegner der NATO- und EU-Mitgliedschaft Polens. [After the last parliamentary elections, Samoobrona has 53 Sejm deputies and two senators. Its leader, the 47-year-old farmer Andrzej Lepper, rejects globalisation, criticises the free market economy and strikes protectionist, socialist and nationalist tones. There are also some pro-Russian tendencies and a noticeable nostalgia for the People's Republic of Poland. Lepper is an opponent of Poland's NATO and EU membership.]
    • Outhwaite, William; Ray, Larry (2005). Social Theory and Postcommunism. Blackwell Publishing Ltd. p. 167. ISBN 0-631-21112-8. Even in countries preparing for entry into the EU in 2004 this manifested itself in populist resistance to the EU and globalization. For example in Poland Andrzej Lepper's rural Self Defense movement, which organizes direct action to oppose integration with the EU, won 10.2 percent in the 2001 elections.
14. • Aleksandra Galasińska; Dariusz Galasiński (2010). The Post-Communist Condition: Public and Private Discourses of Transformation. John Benjamins Publishing Company. p. 105. ISBN 978-9027206282. Presented below, an in-depth analysis of the discourses surrounding the Sex-Affair or the Jobs-for-Sex-Scandal in the Polish left-wing populist Samoobrona (Self-Defence) party, provides a very good example of the widespread approach to women as standard others of the Polish public sphere.
    • Giuseppe Ieraci; Serena Baldin. "The Rule of Law in the New EU Member States". Poliarchie/Polyarchies. Special Issue 2023: 64. ISSN 2611-2914. Indeed, if we exclude Slovenia, the only country in the region that had a relatively successful left-wing populist party was Poland, with Self-Defense (10.8% in 2004, for details, see Krok-Paszkowska 2003).
    • Kowalczyk, Krzysztof [in Polish]. "Uwarunkowania, strategia i taktyka kampanii Bronisława Komorowskiego w wyborach prezydenckich 2010 r. w Polsce". Studia i Analizy (in Polish). 19 (1): 200. Do Sejmu weszły również: populistyczno-lewicowa Samoobrona RP – 11,41%, narodowo-katolicka Liga Polskich Rodzin (LPR) – 7,97% oraz Polskie Stronnictwo Ludowe (PSL) – 6,96%. [Also entering the Sejm were the populist-leftist Self-Defence of the Republic of Poland with 11.41%, the national-Catholic League of Polish Families (LPR) with 7.97% and the Polish People's Party (PSL) with 6.96%.]
    • Jarmila Curtiss; Alfons Balmann; Kirsti Dautzenberg; Kathrin Happe (2006). Agriculture in the Face of Changing Markets, Institutions and Policies: Challenges and Strategies (PDF). Vol. 33. Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies. p. 261. ISBN 3-938584-10-6. ISSN 1436-221X. Populist left wing: Self-Defense of the Republic of Poland (Samoobrona RP), agrarian party;
    • Rudolf von Thadden; Anna Hofmann (24 January 2024). Populismus in Europa - Krise der Demokratie?. Genshagener Gespräche (in German). Vol. 7. Wallstein-Verlag. p. 143. ISBN 978-3-89244-944-7. Mit Blick auf Leppers marktwirtschafts- und globalisierungs-kritische Rhetorik und seine positive Bezugnahme auf die Volksrepublik Polen der 70er Jahre bzw. die Gierek-Epoche könnte die Samoobrona durchaus auch in die Rubrik Linkspopulismus eingeordnet werden. [In view of Lepper's rhetoric critical of the market economy and globalisation and his positive reference to the People's Republic of Poland of the 1970s or the Gierek era, Samoobrona could certainly also be classified under the label of left-wing populism.]
    • "Europe and the Crisis of Democracy, Elections in Europe: 1999-2002" (PDF). Notre Europe, Sciences Po et IUE. 6. Les Cahiers européens de Sciences Po: 29. 11 October 2002. Populism #2 is characteristic of LEFTIST populist parties (in Poland: Samoobrona and PSL which are axiologically (#3) either indifferent or diffusely-neutral, respectively).
    • Yusupova, Nargiza (28 January 2021). "The Crisis of Democracy: the Case Study of Democratic Backsliding and the Rise of Populism in Poland". Theses and Dissertations. 1421. Illinois State University: 10. Besides, taking into consideration the populist dimension, we can identify the Self-Defense (Samoobrona in Polish) as populist-leftist, and both the League of Polish Families (LPR) and PiS as populist-rightist (Hartlinski, 2019, 741).
    • Ellen Bos; Dieter Segert (2008). Osteuropäische Demokratien als Trendsetter? Parteien und Parteiensysteme nach dem Ende des Übergangsjahrzehnts (in German). Opladen: Budrich. p. 303. ISBN 978-3-86649-161-8. Sowohl seine Partei als auch ihre Koalitionspartner, die agrarisch-links-populistische Selbstverteidigung (SO) und die national-katholische Liga der Polnischen Familie (LPR) machten vor und nach den Wahlen durch populistische Inszenierungen und nationalistische Töne von sich reden. [Both his party and its coalition partners, the agrarian left-populist Self-Defence (SO) and the national Catholic League of the Polish Family (LPR) made a name for themselves before and after the elections with populist stagings and nationalist tones.]
    • Chatzistavrou, Filippa (2010). "Early preferences of national political parties in the EU for Turkey's accession". Southeast European and Black Sea Studies. 10 (4). Routledge: 403. doi:10.1080/14683857.2010.529991. This coalition was composed of the Law and Justice Party (PiS), the left-populist called Samoobrona and the national Catholic party called League of Polish Families (LPR).
15. • Pankowski, Rafał (2010). "Self-Defence: Radical Populism". The Populist Radical Right in Poland: The Patriots. Routledge. p. 135. ISBN 978-0-203-85656-7. Thus, the party has been labelled as 'left-wing', 'ultra-leftist', 'left-nationalist', 'populist', and 'agrarian' – combining 'socialism, [and] agrarian populism'.
    • Jeffrey C. Alexander; Peter Kivisto; Giuseppe Sciortino (December 2020). Populism in the Civil Sphere. Polity Press. p. 126. ISBN 9781509544752. In recent decades, Polish populism has emerged over three different phases. The first phase was the ascent to power of two new parties: the conservative nationalist LPR (Liga Polskich Rodzin/League of Polish Families) and the left nationalist SRP (Samoobrona Rzeczpospolitej Polskiej/Self-Defense of the Republic of Poland), founded respectively in 2001 and 1992.
    • Christoph Zöpel (25 April 2016). "Sejm oder nicht Sejm, das ist hier die Frage". ipg-journal.de (in German). Seine historische Leistung ist es, Polen in die EU geführt zu haben, sein Scheitern waren Rywin-Gate, ein Bestechungsskandal gegenüber der Gazeta Wyborcza, und seine Kandidatur 2007 für die linksnationalistische Samoobrona (Selbstverteidigung). [His historic achievement is to have led Poland into the EU, his failures were Rywin-Gate, a bribery scandal against Gazeta Wyborcza, and his candidacy in 2007 for the left nationalist Samoobrona (Self-Defence).]
    • Hylén, Linnea (4 June 2021). "Dark, Dirty and Secret": A Qualitative Study on Russia's Financial Active Measures (PDF) (Master thesis). Institute for Russian and Eurasian Studies (IRES). p. 35. One of ECAG's founders, Mateusz Piskorski, is a former MP of the left-wing, nationalist, and religious conservative party Self-Defence of the Republic of Poland (in Polish: Samoobrona Rzeczpospolitej Polskiej).
    • Marek Barański [in Polish]; Natalia Rudakiewicz; Maciej Guza (2015). Doświadczenia transformacji systemowej w państwach Europy Środkowej i Wschodniej (in Polish). Katowice: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego. ISBN 978-83-8012-692-3. ISSN 0208-6336. W 2001 r. taktykę backlashu stosowały partie prawicowe − PiS i LPR oraz agrarno‑antysystemowa czy też narodowo‑lewicowa Samoobrona RP. [In 2001, backlash tactics were used by right-wing parties - PiS and LPR and the agrarian-antisystem or national-left Self-Defence of Poland.]
16. Raymond Taras (2012). Xenophobia and Islamophobia in Europe. Edinburgh University Press. p. 100. ISBN 978-0-7486-5487-1.
17. Knut Andreas Grimstad (2012). "What Europe means for Poland: The front-page coverage of Independence Day in Gazeta Wyborcza 1989–2009". In Ljiljana Saric; Karen Gammelgaard; Kjetil Rå Hauge (eds.). Transforming National Holidays: Identity Discourse in the West and South Slavic Countries, 1985-2010. John Benjamins Publishing. p. 275. ISBN 978-90-272-0638-1.
18. Mcmanus-Czubińska, Clare; Miller, William L.; Markowski, Radosław [in Polish]; Wasilewski, Jacek (2003). "The new Polish 'right'?". Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politic. 19 (2). Routledge: 21. doi:10.1080/13523270300660009.
19. Bale, Tim; Szczerbiak, Aleks (December 2006). "Why is there no Christian Democracy in Poland (and why does this matter)?". Party Politics. SEI Working Paper. 14 (4). Sussex European Institute: 19. ISSN 1350-4649.
20. Gerrit Voerman [in Dutch]; Dirk Strijker; Ida Terluin (2015). "Contemporary Populism, the Agrarian and the Rural in Central Eastern and Western Europe". In Sarah de Lange [in Dutch] (ed.). Rural Protest Groups and Populist Political Parties. Wageningen Academic Publishers. p. 172. doi:10.3920/978-90-8686-807-0. ISBN 9789086862597.
21. Pankowski, Rafał (2010). "Self-Defence: Radical Populism". The Populist Radical Right in Poland: The Patriots. Routledge. p. 136. ISBN 978-0-203-85656-7.
22. Kowalczyk, Krzysztof [in Polish]. "Uwarunkowania, strategia i taktyka kampanii Bronisława Komorowskiego w wyborach prezydenckich 2010 r. w Polsce". Studia i Analizy (in Polish). 19 (1): 200. Do Sejmu weszły również: populistyczno-lewicowa Samoobrona RP – 11,41%, narodowo-katolicka Liga Polskich Rodzin (LPR) – 7,97% oraz Polskie Stronnictwo Ludowe (PSL) – 6,96%. [Also entering the Sejm were the populist-leftist Self-Defence of the Republic of Poland with 11.41%, the national-Catholic League of Polish Families (LPR) with 7.97% and the Polish People's Party (PSL) with 6.96%.]
23. M. Migalski, Polskie ugrupowania parlamentarne na tle diady…, p. 49
24. "Samoobrona - to była prawdziwa lewica" (in Polish). Retrieved 10 September 2019.
25. Paul G. Lewis; Zdenka Mansfeldová (2007). "12.1:The changing boundaries and structures of party systems". The European Union and Party Politics in Central and Eastern Europe. Palgrave Macmillan. p. 233. doi:10.1057/9780230596658. ISBN 9780230596658. It is not accidental that in recent years a new leftist-populist group of parties has appeared (Smer, Self-Defence, the Communist Party of Slovakia, Lithuanian Labour) in a process that parallels the social democratization of the major leftist parties.
26. A. Antoszewski, Partie i systemy partyjne państw Unii Europejskiej na przełomie wieków, Toruń 2009, s. 209, 243
27. Kostrzębski, Karol (2002). "Kampanie wyborcze ruchów populistycznych w Polsce i Niemczech – analiza porównawcza". Studia Politologiczne (in Polish). 6 (1): 283–316. ISSN 1640-8888.
28. Marek Barański [in Polish]; Natalia Rudakiewicz; Maciej Guza (2015). Doświadczenia transformacji systemowej w państwach Europy Środkowej i Wschodniej (in Polish). Katowice: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego. ISBN 978-83-8012-692-3. ISSN 0208-6336. W 2001 r. taktykę backlashu stosowały partie prawicowe − PiS i LPR oraz agrarno‑antysystemowa czy też narodowo‑lewicowa Samoobrona RP. [In 2001, backlash tactics were used by right-wing parties - PiS and LPR and the agrarian-antisystem or national-left Self-Defence of Poland.]
29. Mateusz Piskorski [in Polish] (2010). Samoobrona RP w polskim systemie partyjnym (in Polish) (Dissertation ed.). Poznań: Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań. p. 173.
30. Rozmowa z przewodniczącym Samoobrony, Andrzejem Lepperem, kandydatem na Prezydenta RP, „Chłopska Droga”, 8.VIII.2005
31. Lisiakiewicz, Rafał (2014). "Wizja państwa polskiego w programach politycznych Samoobrony RP". Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego W Krakowie (in Polish). 7 (931): 41–58. doi:10.15678/ZNUEK.2014.0931.0703. ISSN 1898-6447.
32. K. Pilawski, Rozum pokona prawicę, „Trybuna”, 31.I.2005.
33. M. Tańska, Lewicowi, patriotyczni i prospołeczni. Rozmowa z Andrzejem Lepperem, przewodniczącym Samoobrony, „Express Bydgoski. Magazyn”, 31.XII.2004
34. Pankowski, Rafał (2010). "Self-Defence: Radical Populism". The Populist Radical Right in Poland: The Patriots. Routledge. p. 137. ISBN 978-0-203-85656-7.
35. Rozmowa z A. Lepperem, Polskie Radio Program 1, „Sygnały Dnia”, 1.VIII.2005
36. Pankowski, Rafał (2010). "Self-Defence: Radical Populism". The Populist Radical Right in Poland: The Patriots. Routledge. p. 128. ISBN 978-0-203-85656-7.
37. Mateusz Piskorski [in Polish] (2010). Samoobrona RP w polskim systemie partyjnym (in Polish) (Dissertation ed.). Poznań: Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań. p. 121.
38. A. Rybak, Orły Samoobrony, „Polityka”, 27.VIII.2005
39. Mateusz Piskorski [in Polish] (2010). Samoobrona RP w polskim systemie partyjnym (in Polish) (Dissertation ed.). Poznań: Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań. p. 134.
40. Jarosław Tomasiewicz [in Polish] (17 January 2017). "Narodziny, wzlot i upadek Anteusza. W piątą rocznicę śmierci Andrzeja Leppera". Nowy Obywatel (in Polish). 22 (63).
41. Przewrócić Okrągły Stół. Rozmowa z prof. Maciejem Giertychem, kandydatem Ligi Polskich Rodzin, „Nasz Dziennik”, 14.IX.2005
42. Kompleks lewicy. Z prof. Mirosławem Karwatem, politologiem z Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego, rozmawia Magdalena Kaszulanis, „Trybuna”, 20.VI.2005
43. Piotr Długosz (2008). Trauma wielkiej zmiany na Podkarpaciu (in Polish). Kraków: Zakład Wydawniczy »NOMOS«. p. 187. ISBN 9788360490556.
44. Sławomir Drelich (19 December 2005). "Historia Przez Leppera Pisana". Dialogi Polityczne (in Polish) (5–6): 65–74. doi:10.12775/DP.2005.005.
45. Urszula Urban (2009). Transformacja ustrojowa a pamięć zbiorowa Polski Ludowej - między nostalgią a zapomnieniem (in Polish). Vol. 15. Warsaw: Instytut Nauk Politycznych Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego. pp. 104–114. ISBN 9788371518560.
46. Mateusz Piskorski [in Polish] (2010). Samoobrona RP w polskim systemie partyjnym (in Polish) (Dissertation ed.). Poznań: Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań. p. 250.
47. Mirosława Grabowska [in Polish] (2006). Piotr Kosiewski [in Polish] (ed.). Polskie podziały polityczne; in:Jaka Polska? Czyja Polska? (PDF) (in Polish). Warsaw: Fundacja im. Stefana Batorego. p. 177. ISBN 83-89406-71-3.
48. Mateusz Piskorski [in Polish] (2010). Samoobrona RP w polskim systemie partyjnym (in Polish) (Dissertation ed.). Poznań: Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań. p. 364. Także w przyjętym w 2003 roku programie partii odnajdujemy bezpośrednie nawiązanie: „Samoobrona Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej kieruje się nauką społeczną Kościoła i w pełni podziela zawarte w encyklikach wskazania największego autorytetu moralnego naszych czasów, za jaki uznajemy Papieża Jana Pawła II". [Also in the party's programme, adopted in 2003, we find a direct reference: „The Self-Defence of the Republic of Poland is guided by the social teachings of the Church and fully shares the indications contained in the encyclicals of the greatest moral authority of our time, Pope John Paul II”.]
49. Rafał Woś (8 August 2019). "Szkoda Leppera". tygodnikpowszechny.pl.
50. Rafał Kalukin (5 August 2021). "Andrzej Lepper wskazał drogę populistom". polityka.pl (in Polish).
51. "Lepper: Samoobrona stawiała na program". wp.pl. 19 October 2007.
52. ""Polacy! Odwagi!"; "Wybieramy biało-czerwonych"". wp.pl (in Polish). 19 May 2004. Retrieved 23 August 2023.
53. • IKS (24 September 2001). "Z biało-czerwonymi krawatami". dziennikpolski24.pl (in Polish).
    • "Samoobrona w pogotowiu (aktl.)". wprost.pl (in Polish). 7 April 2002.
    • Małgorzata Adamik-Szysiak; Wojciech Maguś (2013). Współczesne zagadnienia marketingu politycznego i public relations (in Polish). Lublin: UMCS. p. 315. ISBN 978-83-7784-287-4. Partią, która w trakcie kampanii wyborczych postawiła na piosenkę, jest Samoobrona. W przygotowanym w r. 2001 na potrzeby tej partii utworze „Ten kraj jest nasz i wasz" postawiono, podobnie jak w 1995 roku na potrzeby kampanii Kwaśniewskiego, na muzykę disco-polo. [A party that relied on song during its election campaigns is Self-Defence. The song "This country is ours and yours", prepared for the party in 2001, relied on disco-polo music.]
54. "Samoobrona. Partia Polityczna - Aktualności". samoobrona.org.pl (in Polish). 15 August 2009. Archived from the original on 15 August 2009. Retrieved 26 August 2024.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: unfit URL (link)
55. "Samoobrona Rzeczpospolitej Polskiej". newsweek.pl (in Polish). 21 May 2010.
56. "Działacze Samoobrony debatowali nad przyszłością partii". radioolsztyn.pl (in Polish). 17 November 2013.
57. Name under which party is registered
58. Nikolaus Werz [in German] (30 April 2003). Populismus: Populisten in Übersee und Europa. Analysen (in German). Vol. 79 (1 ed.). VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften Wiesbaden. p. 167. ISBN 978-3-663-11110-8. Die Samoobrona verfügt nach den letzten Parlamentswahlen über 53 Sejmabgeordnete und zwei Senatoren. 13 Ihr Führer, der 47-jährige Landwirt Andrzej Lepper, lehnt die Globalisierung ab, kritisiert die freie Marktwirtschaft und schlägt protektionistische, sozialistische und nationalistische Töne an. Zu verzeichnen sind auch manche prorussische Tendenzen sowie eine spürbare Nostalgie für die Volksrepublik Polen. Lepper ist ein Gegner der NATO- und EU-Mitgliedschaft Polens. [After the last parliamentary elections, Samoobrona has 53 Sejm deputies and two senators. Its leader, the 47-year-old farmer Andrzej Lepper, rejects globalisation, criticises the free market economy and strikes protectionist, socialist and nationalist tones. There are also some pro-Russian tendencies and a noticeable nostalgia for the People's Republic of Poland. Lepper is an opponent of Poland's NATO and EU membership.]
59. March, Luke [in Spanish] (2011). "Left-wing Populism: Populist Socialists and Social Populists". Radical Left Parties in Europe. Routledge. p. 145. ISBN 9780203154878.
60. Jean-Michel De Waele; Anna Pacześniak (2012). "The Europeanisation of Poland's Political Parties and Party System". In Erol Külahci (ed.). Europeanisation and Party Politics: How the EU affects Domestic Actors, Patterns and Systems. ECPR Press. p. 131. ISBN 978-1-907301-84-1.
61. Magone, José M. (2011), Comparative European Politics: An Introduction, Routledge, p. 386
62. Stijn van Kessel (2015). Populist Parties in Europe: Agents of Discontent?. Palgrave Macmillan UK. p. 145. ISBN 978-1-137-41411-3.
63. Elisabeth Bakke (2010). "Central and East European Party Systems since 1989". In Sabrina P. Ramet (ed.). Central and Southeast European Politics since 1989. Cambridge University Press. p. 81. ISBN 978-1-139-48750-4.
64. Luca Tomini (2015). Democratizing Central and Eastern Europe: Successes and Failures of the European Union. Routledge. p. 71. ISBN 978-1-317-56675-5.
65. Marcin Kula; Marcin Zaremba (1998). "Nationalism as an Expression of Social Conflicts in Contemporary Poland". In Ray Taras (ed.). National Identities and Ethnic Minorities in Eastern Europe: Selected Papers from the Fifth World Congress of Central and East European Studies, Warsaw, 1995. Springer. p. 154. ISBN 978-1-349-26553-4.
66. Drozd-Piasecka, Mirosława (2012). "Wizerunek przywódcy Samoobrony Andrzeja Leppera w przekazie medialnym" (PDF). Etnografia Polska (in Polish). 56 (1–2). Institute of Archaeology and Ethnology: 5. Samoobrona Rzeczpospolitej Polskiej (założona 10 stycznia 1992, zarejestrowana sądownie 12 czerwca 1992 roku z inicjatywy działaczy ZZR „Samoobrona" do 17 stycznia 2000 roku pod nazwą „Przymierze Samoobrona"), weszła do Sejmu w 2001 roku z poparciem 10,2% głosów. Ta partia polityczna, odwołująca się w różnych okresach swojej działalności głównie do idei narodowo-lewicowych, chrześcijańsko-socjalistycznych, socjaldemokratycznych... [Samoobrona Rzeczpospolitej Polskiej (founded on 10 January 1992, judicially registered on 12 June 1992 on the initiative of activists of the ZZR "Samoobrona" until 17 January 2000 under the name "Przymierze Samoobrona"), entered the Sejm in 2001 with the support of 10.2% of the vote. This political party, referring at various times of its activity mainly to national-left, Christian-socialist, social-democratic ideas...]
67. Swoboda, Hannes; Wiersm, Jan Marinus; Krastev, Ivan (2008). Democracy, Populism and Minority Rights (PDF). PSE, Socialist Group in the European Parliament. p. 67. ISBN 978-92-823-2525-4.
68. Madalena Pontes Meyer Resende (2004). An Ethos Theory of Party Positions on European Integration: Poland and Beyond (PDF). ProQuest LLC. p. 159. However, an analysis of the evolution of the last years makes it apparent that the party identity is mainly based on a radical conception of economic class and is constituted by those heavily disadvantaged by the transition. The Samoobrona can therefore be classified as an extreme-left party.
69. Lisiakiewicz, Rafał (2014). "Miejsce Samoobrony RP w typologii partii politycznych". Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego W Krakowie (in Polish). 2 (926): 39. ISSN 1898-6447. Generalnie na skali lewica–prawica Samoobrona RP umieszczana jest po lewej stronie. [Generally, on the left-right scale, the Self-Defence of the Republic of Poland is placed on the left.]
70. Antoszewski A. [2008], Partie i systemy partyjne państw Unii Europejskiej na przełomie wieków, Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek, Toruń.
71. Miliard F. [2007], The 2005 Parliamentary and Presidential Elections in Poland, „Electoral Studies”, nr 26.
72. Gwiazda A. [2008], The Parliamentary Election in Poland, October 2007, „Electoral Studies”, nr 27.
73. Drelich S. [2006], Analiza marketingowa kampanii parlamentarnej Samoobrony [w:] Wybory parlamentarne 2005. Analiza marketingowa, red. M. Jeziński, Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek, Toruń
74. Bartek Pytlas (2016). Radical Right Parties in Central and Eastern Europe: Mainstream party competition and electoral fortune. Routledge. p. 27. ISBN 9781138889668.
75. Jarmila Curtiss; Alfons Balmann; Kirsti Dautzenberg; Kathrin Happe (2006). Agriculture in the Face of Changing Markets, Institutions and Policies: Challenges and Strategies (PDF). Vol. 33. Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies. p. 261. ISBN 3-938584-10-6. ISSN 1436-221X.
76. Alexandra Gerber (15 September 2011). Being Polish/Becoming European:Gender and The Limits of Diffusion in Polish Accession to the European Union (PDF). University of Michigan Library. p. 168.
77. Bértoa, Fernando Casal (2011). "Sources of Party System Institutionalization in New Democracies: Lessons from East Central Europe". EUI Working Paper SPS. 1. European University Institute: 13, 18. ISSN 1725-6755.
78. ""Samoobrona" ze sztucerem" (PDF). Gazeta Nowa (in Polish). 125 (431). 16 June 1992.
79. Mateusz Piskorski [in Polish] (2010). Samoobrona RP w polskim systemie partyjnym (in Polish) (Dissertation ed.). Poznań: Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań. p. 52.
80. Mateusz Piskorski [in Polish] (2010). Samoobrona RP w polskim systemie partyjnym (in Polish) (Dissertation ed.). Poznań: Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań. p. 53.
81. Bartczak, Marcin (21 April 2023). "Agrounia. Czy idą drogą Samoobrony?". wiescirolnicze.pl (in Polish).
82. Gorlach, Krzystof (200). "Freedom for Credit: Polish Peasants Protests in the Era of Communism and Post-Communism". Polish Sociological Review (129). Polish Sociological Association: 57–85. JSTOR 41274736.
83. Tomasiewicz, Jarosław [in Polish] (2023). "Populiści w poszukiwaniu tożsamości – ideologiczne inspiracje Samoobrony (1991–2007)". Praktyka Teoretyczna (in Polish). 48 (2): 42. doi:10.19195/prt.2023.2.2.
84. Pankowski, Rafał (2010). "Self-Defence: Radical Populism". The Populist Radical Right in Poland: The Patriots. Routledge. p. 132. ISBN 978-0-203-85656-7.
85. Czechowska-Derkacz, Beata (2012). Magia politycznych wizerunków w mediach: Aleksander Kwaśniewski i Andrzej Lepper: studium przypadków (in Polish). Gdańsk: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Gdańskiego. p. 159. ISBN 978-83-7326-881-4.
86. Pellen, Cédric (26 August 2010). "Un parti, un syndicat ou un mouvement social? Samoobrona, une organisation caméléon dans les jeux politiques polonais post-communistes". 10e Congrès de l'AFSP (in French). 37: 15.
87. Pankowski, Rafał (2010). "Self-Defence: Radical Populism". The Populist Radical Right in Poland: The Patriots. Routledge. p. 133. ISBN 978-0-203-85656-7.
88. Czechowska-Derkacz, Beata (2012). Magia politycznych wizerunków w mediach: Aleksander Kwaśniewski i Andrzej Lepper: studium przypadków (in Polish). Gdańsk: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Gdańskiego. p. 160. ISBN 978-83-7326-881-4.
89. Czechowska-Derkacz, Beata (2012). Magia politycznych wizerunków w mediach: Aleksander Kwaśniewski i Andrzej Lepper: studium przypadków (in Polish). Gdańsk: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Gdańskiego. p. 161. ISBN 978-83-7326-881-4.
90. Pankowski, Rafał (2010). "Self-Defence: Radical Populism". The Populist Radical Right in Poland: The Patriots. Routledge. pp. 134–135. ISBN 978-0-203-85656-7.
91. Mateusz Piskorski [in Polish] (2010). Samoobrona RP w polskim systemie partyjnym (in Polish) (Dissertation ed.). Poznań: Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań. pp. 70–71.
92. Szczudlińska-Kanoś, Agnieszka (2011). Marketing polityczny w regionie (in Polish) (1st ed.). Kraków: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego. p. 70. ISBN 978-83-233-3256-5.
93. Syska, Michał (5 August 2019). ""Razem możemy więcej"". Krytyka Polityczna (in Polish).
94. Sieklucki, Dominik (2007). Partie lewicy i centrolewicy w polskim systemie partyjnym: Aktywność SLD, PSL i UP na polskiej scenie politycznej (in Polish). Kraków: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego. p. 86. ISBN 978-83-233-2241-2.
95. Mateusz Piskorski [in Polish] (2010). Samoobrona RP w polskim systemie partyjnym (in Polish) (Dissertation ed.). Poznań: Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań. p. 73.
96. Tomasiewicz, Jarosław [in Polish] (2023). "Populiści w poszukiwaniu tożsamości – ideologiczne inspiracje Samoobrony (1991–2007)". Praktyka Teoretyczna (in Polish). 48 (2): 54–55. doi:10.19195/prt.2023.2.2.
97. "PPS z Samoobroną" (PDF). Słowo Ludu (in Polish). 38 (15542). Kielce: 4. 14 February 2001.
98. "PPS, Samoobrona and KPEiR to run together in the elections". bankier.pl (in Polish). 5 March 2001.
99. Olczyk, Eliza (28 January 2018). "Bogdan Socha: Cała ta seksafera została wymyślona". Rzeczpospolita (in Polish).
100. Nikolaus Werz [in German] (30 April 2003). Populismus: Populisten in Übersee und Europa. Analysen. Vol. 79 (1 ed.). VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften Wiesbaden. pp. 171–175. ISBN 978-3-663-11110-8.
101. Mudde, Cas (2005). Racist Extremism in Central and Eastern Europe. London and New York: Taylor & Francis Group. p. 149. ISBN 0-203-00237-7.
102. Gawina, Marta (20 August 2006). "Ukłon Leppera". poranny.pl (in Polish).
103. Lopata, Maryan; Halushchak, Mykhailo (2020). "Political Preferences of Ukrainian National Minority in Poland in 2001-2011 Parliamentary Elections on the Basis of National Census". Studium Europy Środkowej i Wschodniej. 14. Kutno: Wydawnictwo Wyższej Szkoły Gospodarki Krajowej w Kutnie: 176–189. ISSN 2353-8392.
104. Szeptycki, Andrzej (2007). "Relat ions between Poland and Ukraine". Yearbook of Polish Foreign Policy. 1. Warsaw: Polski Instytut Spraw Międzynarodowych. ISSN 1233-9903.
105. Kuchcińska-Kurcz, Agnieszka (18 November 2002). "Miłość SLD i Samoobrony". gs24.pl (in Polish).
106. "SLD w parze z Samoobroną". interia.pl (in Polish). 9 December 2003.
107. "Samoobrona zrywa współpracę z SLD". Gazeta Wyborcza (in Polish). 1 April 2003.
108. "Samoobrona zerwała kolejną samorządową koalicję z SLD". Gazeta Wyborcza (in Polish). 17 March 2003.
109. "Łódzka Samoobrona rozwodzi się z SLD". wp.pl (in Polish). 12 March 2003.
110. "SLD-PSL: Jak się zaczynało, jak kończyło". tygodnikpowszechny.pl (in Polish). 9 March 2003.
111. Anthrax claims
112. Spirova, Maria (2008). "The Bulgarian Socialist Party: The long road to Europe". Communist and Post-Communist Studies. 41 (2). Elsevier Ltd on behalf of The Regents of the University of California: 427. doi:10.1016/j.postcomstud.2008.09.005. ISSN 0967-067X.
113. "Sexual harassment claims". Archived from the original on 23 February 2007. Retrieved 10 December 2006.
114. Drozd-Piasecka, Mirosława (2012). "Wizerunek przywódcy Samoobrony Andrzeja Leppera w przekazie medialnym" (PDF). Etnografia Polska (in Polish). 56 (1–2). Institute of Archaeology and Ethnology: 5–30.
115. Norkus, Zenonas [in Polish] (2012). On Baltic Slovenia and Adriatic Lithuania: A Qualitative Comparative Analysis of Patterns in Post-Communist Transformation. Apostrofa. p. 328. ISBN 978-615-5053-50-4.
116. "Umorzono śledztwo ws. wydarzeń na 40. piętrze "Mariotta"; "nie popełniono przestępstwa"". gazetaprawna.pl (in Polish). 30 November 2009.
117. Rozmowa z A. Lepperem, Polskie Radio Program 1, „Sygnały Dnia”, 30.VII.2007
118. Mateusz Piskorski [in Polish] (2010). Samoobrona RP w polskim systemie partyjnym (in Polish) (Dissertation ed.). Poznań: Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań. p. 172.
119. "LPR i Samoobrona razem jako LiS". wp.pl (in Polish). 16 July 2007. Retrieved 27 August 2023.
120. "Nadchodzi... Odrodzenie". tvn24.pl (in Polish). 21 June 2007. Retrieved 23 August 2023.
121. Łukasz Cybiński (22 October 2007). "LPR i Samoobrona poza Sejmem". rp.pl (in Polish). Retrieved 27 August 2023.
122. "Gwara śląska językiem regionalnym?". interia.pl (in Polish). 7 September 2007.
123. Frank, Grzegorz (17 August 2021). "Historia walki o uznanie języka śląskiego". slaskaopinia.pl (in Polish).
124. Mrukot, Bogusław (26 April 2024). "Język śląski – jest ustawa! Tak głosowali opolscy posłowie". opolska360.pl (in Polish).
125. "Śląski nie będzie językiem regionalnym. Prezydent wetuje ustawę". pap.pl. Polish Press Agency. 29 May 2024.
126. Mateusz Piskorski [in Polish] (2010). Samoobrona RP w polskim systemie partyjnym (in Polish) (Dissertation ed.). Poznań: Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań. p. 183.
127. Mateusz Piskorski [in Polish] (2010). Samoobrona RP w polskim systemie partyjnym (in Polish) (Dissertation ed.). Poznań: Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań. p. 184.
128. Pankowski, Rafał (2010). "Self-Defence: Radical Populism". The Populist Radical Right in Poland: The Patriots. Routledge. pp. 143–144. ISBN 978-0-203-85656-7.
129. Izabela Kacprzak (27 December 2012). "Jak upadał Andrzej Lepper". rp.pl (in Polish). Retrieved 27 August 2023.
130. Kowalczyk, Krzysztof [in Polish]. "Uwarunkowania, strategia i taktyka kampanii Bronisława Komorowskiego w wyborach prezydenckich 2010 r. w Polsce". Studia i Analizy (in Polish). 19 (1): 207.
131. Tomasz Kubaszewski (17 June 2010). "Prowadzi Lepper, Kaczyński i Komorowski" (in Polish).
132. Grzywińska, Ilona. "Analiza komunikacji politycznej w serwisach społecznościowych (NK.pl i Facebook.com) podczas prezydenckiej kampanii wyborczej 2010 roku". Studia i Analizy (in Polish). 21 (1): 146.
133. "Sondaż: Powiększa się przewaga Komorowskiego". newsweek.pl (in Polish). 16 June 2010.
134. "Wybory 2010: programy gospodarcze kandydatów". bankier.pl (in Polish). 23 May 2010.
135. "Morawiecki i Lepper chcą stanu klęski żywiołowej". newsweek.pl (in Polish). 25 May 2010.
136. "Lepper ruszył w Polskę". newsweek.pl (in Polish). 12 May 2010.
137. "Debata na UW: Nie było Kaczyńskiego i Napieralskiego". newsweek.pl (in Polish). 9 August 2011.
138. "Lepper żąda wycofania wojska z Afganistanu". newsweek.pl (in Polish). 9 August 2011.
139. "Lepper: "Długi służby zdrowia powinny być zawieszone"". newsweek.pl (in Polish). 15 June 2010.
140. Nizinkiewicz, Jacek (23 May 2010). "Lepper: Radio Maryja stało się radiem PiS". onet.pl (in Polish).
141. "Lepper jeszcze nie zdecydował". bankier.pl (in Polish). 29 June 2010.
142. Paradowska, Janina (26 June 2010). "Trzeci ma głos". newsweek.pl (in Polish).
143. "Andrzej Lepper murem za Łukaszenką". newsweek.pl (in Polish). 29 December 2010.
144. "Ostatnie chwile Leppera". fakt.pl (in Polish). 8 August 2011.
145. "Andrzej Lepper nie żyje. Popełnił samobójstwo". gazetaprawna.pl (in Polish). 5 August 2011. Retrieved 27 August 2023.
146. "Sześć lat od śmierci Andrzeja Leppera". onet.pl (in Polish). 5 August 2017.
147. Eliza Olczyk (3 September 2017). "Zbigniew Witaszek: Andrzej Lepper nie miał powodu popełniać samobójstwa". rp.pl (in Polish).
148. "Lepper nie chciał się zabić? Są na to dowody?". polskieradio24.pl (in Polish). 18 August 2011.
149. Styczek, Adam (5 October 2017). "Nowe fakty nt. śmierci Andrzeja Leppera. "To nie było samobójstwo"". wp.pl (in Polish).
150. Ledwosiński, Marek (8 July 2017). "Samoobrona wystartuje w najbliższych wyborach samorządowych i parlamentarnych". radiopik.pl (in Polish).
151. Wroński, Paweł (11 August 2011). "Sieroty po Lepperze nie głosują". wyborcza.pl (in Polish).
152. "W obronie Syrii!". kom-pol.org (in Polish). 20 September 2011.
153. "Syn Andrzeja Leppera na liście wyborczej SLD. A Samoobrona? "Nawet nie wiedziałem, że startuje"" (in Polish). 8 October 2014.
154. "Tomasz Lepper bez mandatu w sejmiku". tvn24.pl (in Polish). 23 November 2014.
155. "Belaya Rus offers to mediation services in Belarus-West conflict". Belarus Focus. 22 April 2016.
156. Wenzel, Michał (2023). "Od Samoobrony do Agrounii. Wiejskie ruchy społeczne po 1989 roku". Teoria Polityki (in Polish). 7 (1): 167–191. doi:10.4467/25440845TP.23.009.17522.
157. "AgroUnia chce być partią. Kołodziejczak: wzorem Lepper i przedwojenny ruch ludowy". tygodnik-rolniczy.pl (in Polish). 17 February 2022.
158. Sławomir Kamiński (11 August 2021). "AgroUnia chce być partią. "Lepper okazał się prorokiem"". dziennik.pl (in Polish).
159. Szpyrka, Łukasz (9 August 2023). "Powrót Samoobrony. Pójdzie do wyborów z Michałem Kołodziejczakiem". interia.pl (in Polish).
160. Kozłowski, Marcin (11 August 2023). "Samoobrona wystartuje razem z Agrounią. "Musimy wspólnie powstrzymać zło"". gazeta.pl (in Polish).
161. Polak, Piotr (5 August 2023). ""Piszę do Was znad grobu Leppera". Mocny apel Kołodziejczaka do PSL". dorzeczy.pl (in Polish).
162. Radek Pietruszka (16 August 2023). "Wyborczy sojusz Platformy z Agrounią. Po co Tuskowi Kołodziejczak?". tvn24.pl (in Polish).
163. Krzysztof Prokopczyk (13 October 2023). "Wybory". samoobronarp.org (in Polish).
164. Seongcheol Kim (2022). Discourse, Hegemony, and Populism in the Visegrád Four. Routledge Studies in Extremism and Democracy. Routledge. pp. 213–214. ISBN 978-1-003-18600-7.
165. "KOMITET WYBORCZY SAMOOBRONA RZECZPOSPOLITEJ POLSKIEJ". wybory.gov.pl (in Polish). Państwowa Komisja Wyborcza. 2024.
166. "KOMITET WYBORCZY SAMOOBRONA". wybory.gov.pl (in Polish). Państwowa Komisja Wyborcza. 2024.
167. "KOMITET WYBORCZY WYBORCÓW SAMOOBRONA NARODOWA OJCZYZNY POLSKI". wybory.gov.pl (in Polish). Państwowa Komisja Wyborcza. 2024.
168. "Wyniki w okręgu wyborczym nr 5 w wyborach do Sejmiku Województwa Mazowieckiego". wybory.gov.pl (in Polish). Państwowa Komisja Wyborcza. 8 April 2024.
169. "Wyniki w okręgu wyborczym nr 11 w wyborach do Rady Gminy Czastary". wybory.gov.pl (in Polish). Państwowa Komisja Wyborcza. 8 April 2024.
170. "Wyniki w okręgu wyborczym nr 3 w wyborach do Rady Gminy Igołomia-Wawrzeńczyce". wybory.gov.pl. Państwowa Komisja Wyborcza. 8 April 2024.
171. "Wyniki w okręgu wyborczym nr 8 w wyborach do Rady Gminy Igołomia-Wawrzeńczyce". wybory.gov.pl (in Polish). Państwowa Komisja Wyborcza. 8 April 2024.
172. "Wyniki w okręgu wyborczym nr 13 w wyborach do Rady Gminy Mielnik". wybory.gov.pl (in Polish). Państwowa Komisja Wyborcza. 8 April 2024.
173. "Wyniki w okręgu wyborczym nr 12 w wyborach do Rady Gminy Nurzec-Stacja". wybory.gov.pl (in Polish). Państwowa Komisja Wyborcza. 8 April 2024.
174. "Wyniki w okręgu wyborczym nr 3 w wyborach do Rady Gminy Sokoły". wybory.gov.pl (in Polish). Państwowa Komisja Wyborcza. 8 April 2024.
175. "Wyniki w okręgu wyborczym nr 4 w wyborach do Rady Gminy Sokoły". wybory.gov.pl (in Polish). Państwowa Komisja Wyborcza. 8 April 2024.
176. "Wyniki w okręgu wyborczym nr 5 w wyborach do Rady Gminy Sokoły". wybory.gov.pl (in Polish). Państwowa Komisja Wyborcza. 8 April 2024.
177. "Wyniki w okręgu wyborczym nr 7 w wyborach do Rady Gminy Sokoły". wybory.gov.pl (in Polish). Państwowa Komisja Wyborcza. 8 April 2024.
178. "Wyniki w okręgu wyborczym nr 10 w wyborach do Rady Gminy Sokoły". wybory.gov.pl (in Polish). Państwowa Komisja Wyborcza. 8 April 2024.
179. "Wyniki w okręgu wyborczym nr 13 w wyborach do Rady Gminy Kruklanki". wybory.gov.pl (in Polish). Państwowa Komisja Wyborcza. 8 April 2024.
180. "Komitet Wyborczy Samoobrona Rzeczpospolitej Polskiej w wyborach do Parlamentu Europejskiego w 2024 r." gov.pl (in Polish). Państwowa Komisja Wyborcza. 10 April 2024.
181. Duszyński, Marek (28 May 2024). "Polityka rolna wg. ZZR Samoobrona". samoobrona.net.pl (in Polish).
182. Duszyński, Marek (28 May 2024). "Deklaracja 10 punktów" (PDF). samoobrona.net.pl.
183. "SARECKI Krzysztof". gov.pl (in Polish). 2024.
184. Szczerbiak, Aleks (2003). "Old and New Divisions in Polish Politics: Polish Parties' Electoral Strategies and Bases of Support". Europe-Asia Studies. 55 (5). Taylor & Francis, Ltd.: 729–746. doi:10.1080/0966813032000086855. JSTOR 3594570.
185. Madalena Pontes Meyer Resende (2004). An Ethos Theory of Party Positions on European Integration: Poland and Beyond (PDF). ProQuest LLC. p. 141.
186. Klaus Bachmann (2006). "Die List der Vernunft: Populismus und Modernisierung in Polen" (PDF). Osteuropa (in German). 56 (11–12): 14.
187. Barbara Fedyszak-Radziejowska (16 March 2005). "Polityka wolna od wartości?". gosc.pl (in Polish).
188. "Rewolucja kontra gnojowica". newsweek.pl (in Polish). 7 March 2004.
189. Ian Black (10 June 2004). "'Apathy is greatest enemy' in Brussels poll". The Guardian.
190. Keck-Szajbel, Mark; Klípa, Ondřej; Simmeth, Alexander (2018). Kultury w czasach transformacji. Europa Środkowo-Wschodnia po 1989 roku [Cultures in Times of Transition. East Central Europe after 1989] (PDF). Translated by Adam Peszke. Słubice: Piktogram Polska. p. 40. ISBN 978-83-64707-25-4. ISSN 2364-3382.
191. Popić, Tamara (24 November 2014). Policy Learning, Fast and Slow: Market-Oriented Reforms of Czech and Polish Healthcare Policy, 1989-2009 (PDF) (Doctor of Political and Social Sciences thesis). Florence: European University Institute. p. 180.
192. "Samoobrona ... sen o Warszawie ... wspomnienie ..." salon24.pl (in Polish). 7 October 2011. Retrieved 24 August 2023.
193. "Can someone give a neutral overview of Polish politics?". polishforums.com. 22 October 2010.
194. "JPRS Report, East Europe". Joint Publications Research Service. U.S. Department of Commerce. 24 April 1992.
195. Vlastimil Havlik; Anete Pinkova (2012). Populist Political Parties in East-Central Europe. Masaryk University Press. p. 182. ISBN 978-8021061057.
196. Kai-Olaf Lang (2009). "Populismus in den neuen Mitgliedsländern der EU: Potentiale, Akteure, Konsequenzen" (PDF). SWP-Studie Stiftung: Wissenschaft und Politik (in German). 16. Berlin: Deutsches Institut für Internationale Politik und Sicherheit: 33. ISSN 1611-6372.
197. Jarosław Tomasiewicz [in Polish] (2014). Po dwakroć niepokorni: Szkice z dziejów polskiej lewicy patriotycznej (in Polish). Łódź: Stowarzyszenie „Obywatele Obywatelom”. p. 238. ISBN 978-83-64496-23-3.
198. Vít Hloušek; Lubomír Kopeček (2010). Origin, Ideology and Transformation of Political Parties: East-Central and Western Europe Compared. Routledge. p. 137. ISBN 978-1-3155-9910-6.
199. Rozmowa z A. Lepperem, Polskie Radio Program 1, „Sygnały Dnia”, 10.VI.2005
200. Biuro Partii, Krajowa Konwencja Wyborcza Samoobrony RP, www.samoobrona.org.pl, odczyt z 12.IV.2008
201. Apel Andrzeja Leppera do działaczy i sympatyków lewicy, Warszawa, 3.X.2005
202. Rozmowa z przewodniczącym Samoobrony, Andrzejem Lepperem, kandydatem na Prezydenta RP, „Chłopska Droga”, 8.VIII.2005
203. Mateusz Piskorski [in Polish] (2010). Samoobrona RP w polskim systemie partyjnym (in Polish) (Dissertation ed.). Poznań: Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań. p. 379.
204. Smith , ‘Le Pen rallies European far right’, 2004.
205. Kmiecik, ‘Czas radykałów’, 1999.
206. Araloff, ‘Poland’s Elections: Brief Information About the Participants’, 2005.
207. Samoobrona Rzeczpospolitej Polskiej’, NationMaster Encyklopedia.
208. ‘Early elections in Poland’, Cosmopolis, 2007.
209. Difficult to understand?’, The Warsaw Voice, 2005
210. Tarrow, The New Transnational Activism, 2005, p. 161.
211. Michał Krzymowski (16 May 2007). "Rozłam na lewicy z poparciem Leppera". wprost.pl. Retrieved 24 August 2023.
212. Nikolaus Werz [in German] (30 April 2003). Populismus: Populisten in Übersee und Europa. Analysen. Vol. 79 (1 ed.). VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften Wiesbaden. p. 167. ISBN 978-3-663-11110-8.
213. Best, Heinrich [in German]; Higley, John (2010). Democratic Elitism: New Theoretical and Comparative Perspectives. Brill. p. 180. ISBN 978-90-04-17939-4.
214. Dempsey, Judy (24 September 2006). "Polish leader tries to hold coalition together". The New York Times.
215. "The Unbearable Whiteness of Being Polish". Slate. Warsaw, Poland. 12 June 2002.
216. Paul G. Lewis; Zdenka Mansfeldová (2007). "12.3 The role of the European issue". The European Union and Party Politics in Central and Eastern Europe. Palgrave Macmillan. p. 242. doi:10.1057/9780230596658. ISBN 9780230596658. In the largest group of countries (Slovakia, Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland and, more recently, Estonia) Eurosceptic parties appear on both the right-wing nationalist (SNS, MIÉP, Ataka, LPR, to some extent ODS) and radical left (KSČM, Hungarian Labour Party, Association of Workers of Slovakia, Communist Party of Slovakia, Self-Defence) ends of the party spectrum.
217. Andrzej Antoszewski [in Polish] (2005). Partie polityczne Europy Środkowej i Wschodniej (in Polish). Poznań-Wrocław: Wyższa Szkoła Zarządzania i Bankowości w Poznaniu. p. 180. ISBN 83-88544-63-2. Jedyne ugrupowanie ekstremalnej lewicy, które nie jest formacją neokomunistyczną, to polska Samoobrona. W wielu momentach jej program gospodarczy, akcentujący głównie konieczność powstrzymania prywatyzacji oraz ochronę narodowych interesów, jest zbieżny z postulatami partii neokomunistycznych. [The only grouping of the extreme left that is not a neo-communist formation is the Polish Samoobrona. At many points, its economic programme, which mainly emphasises the need to stop privatisation and to protect national interests, coincides with the demands of neo-communist parties.]
218. Ryszard Herbut [in Polish]; Andrzej Antoszewski [in Polish] (2007). Systemy polityczne współczesnej Europy (in Polish). Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN. p. 102. ISBN 978-83-011-4622-1. W niektórych elekcjach wzięły udział także inne partie, które mogą być określone mianem skrajnej lewicy. Mamy tu na myśli Związek Robotników Słowacji (ZRS), ukraińską Progresywną Partię Socjalistyczną (SPS) oraz polską Samoobronę. [Other parties that can be described as extreme left also took part in some elections. We are referring to the Union of Workers of Slovakia (ZRS), the Ukrainian Progressive Socialist Party (SPS) and the Polish Self-Defence.]
219. Andrzej Antoszewski [in Polish] (2005). Partie polityczne Europy Środkowej i Wschodniej (in Polish). Poznań-Wrocław: Wyższa Szkoła Zarządzania i Bankowości w Poznaniu. pp. 180–181. ISBN 83-88544-63-2.
220. Ryszard Herbut [in Polish]; Andrzej Antoszewski [in Polish] (2007). Systemy polityczne współczesnej Europy (in Polish). Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN. p. 102. ISBN 978-83-011-4622-1.
221. Mateusz Piskorski [in Polish] (2010). Samoobrona RP w polskim systemie partyjnym (in Polish) (Dissertation ed.). Poznań: Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań. p. 306.
222. Pankowski, Rafał (2010). "Self-Defence: Radical Populism". The Populist Radical Right in Poland: The Patriots. Routledge. p. 142. ISBN 978-0-203-85656-7.
223. Wilhelm Unge; Monika Zamarlik; Marcin Mączka; Piotr Fudała; Mateusz Tobiczyk; Łukasz Wojcieszak (2006). Polish-Russian Relations in an Eastern Dimension Context. Totalförsvarets Forskningsinstitut (FOI). p. 97. ISSN 1650-1942.
224. Populist Parties in Poland: Samoobrona - Serious Political Entity or Farce?, “SPACE AND POWER IN EUROPE. CULTURE, COMMUNICATION, AND THE POLITICS OF IDENTITY”Timothy Campbell^{[permanent dead link‍]}, GEORG-AUGUST-UNIVERSITÄT, GÖTTINGEN, Master of Arts in Euroculture Program, Winter Semester 2005/2006, IP-Abstract, p. 4
225. Deleersnijder, Henri (2005). "La dérive populiste en Europe centrale et orientale" [The Populist Drift in Central and Eastern Europe]. La Revue. 42 (2). Translated by Cadenza Academic Translations. Hermès: 181–186. doi:10.4267/2042/9002.
226. Pankowski, Rafał (2010). "Self-Defence: Radical Populism". The Populist Radical Right in Poland: The Patriots. Routledge. p. 141. ISBN 978-0-203-85656-7.
227. Věra Stojarová; Jakub Šedo; Lubomír Kopeček; Roman Chytilek (2007). Political Parties in Central and Eastern Europe: In Search of Consolidation (PDF). Central and Eastern Europe Regional Report. Stockholm: International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance. p. 36. ISBN 978-91-85724-01-7.
228. Hanley, David (2008). Beyond the Nation State: Parties in the Era of European Integration. Palgrave MacMillan. pp. 188–190. ISBN 978-1-4039-0795-0.
229. Gerrit Voerman [in Dutch]; Dirk Strijker; Ida Terluin (2015). "The Polish Self-Defence party: from agrarian protest to the politics of populism, 1991-2007". In B. Stanley (ed.). Rural Protest Groups and Populist Political Parties. Wageningen Academic Publishers. pp. 197–200. doi:10.3920/978-90-8686-807-0. ISBN 9789086862597.
230. Maciej Marmola (2020). Nowe partie w systemach partyjnych państw Grupy Wyszehradzkiej (PDF) (in Polish). Toruń: Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek. pp. 157–163.
231. Marsh, Michael; Mikhaylov, Slava; Schmitt, Hermann. "European Elections after Eastern Enlargement: Preliminary Results from the European Election Study 2004" (PDF). CONNEX Report Series. 1. Mannheim: CONNEX: 244–245. ISSN 1864-1539.
232. Chambers, Gary (2006). "The Dual Challenge of Democratisation and European Integration in Post-Communist Poland". Marmara Journal of European Studies. 14 (2). Atatürk Education Faculty: 222.
233. McManus-Czubińska, Clare; Miller, William L.; Markowski, Radosław; Wasilewski, Jacek (2003). "Understanding Dual Identities in Poland". Political Studies. 51 (1). Polish Academy of Sciences: 135. doi:10.1111/1467-9248.00416.
234. https://repozytorium.amu.edu.pl/bitstream/10593/766/1/DR.pdf ^{[bare URL PDF]}
235. Gerrit Voerman [in Dutch]; Dirk Strijker; Ida Terluin (2015). "The Polish Self-Defence party: from agrarian protest to the politics of populism, 1991-2007". In B. Stanley (ed.). Rural Protest Groups and Populist Political Parties. Wageningen Academic Publishers. p. 196. doi:10.3920/978-90-8686-807-0. ISBN 9789086862597.
236. Mateusz Piskorski [in Polish] (2010). Samoobrona RP w polskim systemie partyjnym (in Polish) (Dissertation ed.). Poznań: Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań. p. 363.
237. Leszek Koczanowicz (January 2019). "The State of the Left" (PDF). The Landscape After a Disaster and Even Two: On the Genealogy of the Polish Left. Hard Times. 103 (1): 91. ISSN 0171-1695.
238. Ania Krok-Paszkowska; Petr Kopecky; Cas Mudde (2003). "Samoobrona: The Polish Self-Defence Movement". Uncivil Society? Contentious Politics in Post-Communist Europe. Routledge. p. 114. ISBN 9780203988787.
239. Mateusz Piskorski [in Polish] (2010). Samoobrona RP w polskim systemie partyjnym (in Polish) (Dissertation ed.). Poznań: Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań. p. 262.
240. Mateusz Piskorski [in Polish] (2010). Samoobrona RP w polskim systemie partyjnym (in Polish) (Dissertation ed.). Poznań: Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań. p. 264.
241. Od odpowiedzialności nie uchylaliśmy się nigdy. Z wicemarszałkiem Sejmu RP, Andrzejem Lepperem o aktualnej sytuacji w Polsce rozmawia Danuta Prokurat, „Chłopska Droga”, 20.XI.2005
242. Mateusz Piskorski [in Polish] (2010). Samoobrona RP w polskim systemie partyjnym (in Polish) (Dissertation ed.). Poznań: Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań. p. 267.
243. W obronie spółdzielczości. Przemówienie sejmowe posła Samoobrony Mieczysława Aszkiełowicza podczas drugiego czytania projektu ustawy o zmianie ustawy o spółdzielniach mieszkaniowych oraz niektórych innych ustaw – 15 lutego 2005 r., „Chłopska Droga”, 27.II.2005.
244. Mateusz Piskorski [in Polish] (2010). Samoobrona RP w polskim systemie partyjnym (in Polish) (Dissertation ed.). Poznań: Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań. p. 269.
245. Mateusz Piskorski [in Polish] (2010). Samoobrona RP w polskim systemie partyjnym (in Polish) (Dissertation ed.). Poznań: Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań. p. 311.
246. Madalena Pontes Meyer Resende (2004). An Ethos Theory of Party Positions on European Integration: Poland and Beyond (PDF). ProQuest LLC. p. 151.
247. Moroska, Aleksandra; Zuba, Krzysztof (2010). "Two faces of Polish populism: the causes of the success and fall of Self Defence and the League of Polish Families". Totalitarismus und Demokratie. 7 (1). Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht: 130. doi:10.13109/tode.2010.7.1.123. ISSN 1612-9008.
248. Minkenberg, Michael; Perrineau, Pascal (2007). "The Radical Right in the European Elections 2004". International Political Science Review. 28 (1). SagePub: 49. doi:10.1177/0192512107070401.
249. Reszczyński, Wojciech [in Polish] (1995). Wygrać Prezydenta. Wojciecha Reszczyńskiego rozmowy z kandydatami na Urząd Prezydenta Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej (wybory '95) (in Polish). Warsaw: Wydawnictwo von Borowiecky. p. 115. ISBN 83-904286-0-1. Jestem jednak przeciwny karze śmierci. Jako katolik innego zdania mieć nie mogę, bo - nie ząb za ząb, łeb za łeb. [However, I am against the death penalty. As a Catholic I cannot have a different opinion, because - not tooth for tooth, head for head.] - Spoken by Andrzej Lepper.
250. Reszczyński, Wojciech [in Polish] (1995). Wygrać Prezydenta. Wojciecha Reszczyńskiego rozmowy z kandydatami na Urząd Prezydenta Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej (wybory '95) (in Polish). Warsaw: Wydawnictwo von Borowiecky. p. 116. ISBN 83-904286-0-1. Jestem natomiast przeciwnikiem eutanazji. [I am, however, opposed to euthanasia.] - Spoken by Andrzej Lepper.
251. Kowalczyk, Krzysztof (2015). "Stanowiska polskich partii politycznych wobec religii i Kościoła. Propozycja typologii". Studia Politicae Universitatis Silesiensis. 15 (1): 185. ISSN 2353-9747.
252. Raciborski, Jacek [in Polish] (1997). Polskie wybory. Zachowania wyborcze społeczeństwa polskiego 1989-1995 (in Polish). Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Naukowe „Scholar”. p. 82. ISBN 83-87367-16-8. Andrzej Lepper — przywódca „Samoobrony" na potrzeby wyborów wystąpił z rozwiniętym programem odnoszącym się do wszystkich sfer funkcjonowania państwa i społeczeństwa, łącznie z polityką zagraniczną i kwestią aborcji (odpowiedział się za jej dopuszczalnością). [Andrzej Lepper — the leader of „Samoobrona” for the elections came up with an elaborate programme relating to all spheres of state and society, including foreign policy and the issue of abortion (he spoke in favour of its permissibility).]
253. Mateusz Piskorski [in Polish] (2010). Samoobrona RP w polskim systemie partyjnym (in Polish) (Dissertation ed.). Poznań: Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań. p. 312.
254. Lepper, Andrzej (12 October 2005). "List do Lecha Kaczyńskiego, Kandydata na Prezydenta Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej". samoobrona.org.pl (in Polish). Archived from the original on 20 May 2009.
255. "Do parlamentu po raz dziesiąty powraca temat związków partnerskich". 6 June 2018.
256. "Lepper: Radio Maryja stało się radiem PiS". 23 May 2010.
257. "Eine unheilige Allianz in Polen". Neue Zürcher Zeitung (in German). 29 April 2006. Lepper war aber selbst bis zur Wende ein Mitglied der Kommunistischen Partei. Auch hatten sich die Abgeordneten der Samoobrona in der letzten Legislaturperiode meist gegen die von den Kaczynskis eingebrachten Gesetzesvorlagen zur sogenannten Entkommunisierung und zur Aufarbeitung der sozialistischen Vergangenheit ausgesprochen. [However, Lepper himself was a member of the Communist Party until the fall of communism. In the last legislative period, Samoobrona MPs had also spoken out against the bills introduced by the Kaczynskis on so-called decommunisation and coming to terms with the socialist past.]
258. Mirosława Grabowska [in Polish] (2006). Piotr Kosiewski [in Polish] (ed.). Polskie podziały polityczne; in:Jaka Polska? Czyja Polska? (PDF) (in Polish). Warsaw: Fundacja im. Stefana Batorego. p. 178. ISBN 83-89406-71-3.
259. Dudek, Antoni [in Polish] (2014). "The Consequences of the System Transformation of 1989 in Poland" (PDF). Remembrance and Solidarity Studies in 20th Century European History (3). European Network Remembrance and Solidarity: 20. ISSN 2084-3518.
260. Sławomir Drelich (19 December 2005). "Historia Przez Leppera Pisana". Dialogi Polityczne (in Polish) (5–6): 68. doi:10.12775/DP.2005.005. W ten sposób lepperowska Samoobrona wyrasta na polskiej scenie politycznej na partię najbardziej postkomunistyczną. [In this way, Lepper's Samoobrona is emerging on the Polish political scene as the most post-communist party.]
261. Maciej Marmola (2020). Nowe partie w systemach partyjnych państw Grupy Wyszehradzkiej (PDF) (in Polish). Toruń: Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek. p. 157. W przypadku autoidentyfikacji na skali lewica–prawica głosujący na ugrupowanie Leppera byli znacznie bardziej lewicowi niż wyborcy wszystkich innych ugrupowań i niegłosujący. [In the case of self-identification on the left-right scale, voters for Lepper's party were significantly more left-wing than voters for all other parties and non-voters.]
262. Reszczyński, Wojciech [in Polish] (1995). Wygrać Prezydenta. Wojciecha Reszczyńskiego rozmowy z kandydatami na Urząd Prezydenta Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej (wybory '95) (in Polish). Warsaw: Wydawnictwo von Borowiecky. p. 115. ISBN 83-904286-0-1. Sądzę, że za grzywny, alimenta i formalne przekroczenia zdecydowane złagodzenie jest konieczne. (...) Trzeba szukać przyczyny, a ta przyczyna jest jedna: brak nauki, brak pracy, brak wizji przyszłości. Gorszej młodzieży nie mamy, jak mieliśmy przedtem, tylko warunki stworzone takie, które są kryminogenne. [I believe that for fines, alimony and all formal crimes, strong leniency is necessary. (...) It is necessary to look for the cause, and this cause is one: lack of education, lack of work, lack of vision for the future. We do not have a worse youth, as we had before, only conditions created that are criminogenic.]  - Spoken by Andrzej Lepper.
263. J. Raciborski, Polskie wybory. Zachowania wyborcze społeczeństwa polskiego 1989-1995, Warszawa 1997, p. 82.
264. Mateusz Piskorski [in Polish] (2010). Samoobrona RP w polskim systemie partyjnym (in Polish) (Dissertation ed.). Poznań: Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań. p. 316.
265. Rozmowa z A. Lepperem, Polskie Radio Program 1, „Sygnały Dnia”, 1.VIII.2005; Modlitwy rządowe. Rozmowa Piotra Najsztuba z Andrzejem Lepperem, „Przekrój”, 12.I.2006.
266. Mateusz Piskorski [in Polish] (2010). Samoobrona RP w polskim systemie partyjnym (in Polish) (Dissertation ed.). Poznań: Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań. p. 317.
267. J. Raciborski, Polityka polska. Szkice, Warszawa 2003, p. 47.
268. Mateusz Piskorski [in Polish] (2010). Samoobrona RP w polskim systemie partyjnym (in Polish) (Dissertation ed.). Poznań: Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań. p. 318.
269. Mariusz Goss (26 November 2007). "Filipek i Hojarska tworzą Partię Regionów". rp.pl (in Polish).
270. Karolina Huchwajda (2010). "Mechanizm działania bloków wyborczych w Polsce podczas wyborów samorządowych w 2006 roku na przykładzie Sejmiku Województwa Wielkopolskiego" (PDF). Athenaeum. Polskie Studia Politologiczne (in Polish). 25 (1). Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek: 111–112. ISSN 1505-2192.
271. Tomasiewicz, Jarosław [in Polish] (2023). "Populiści w poszukiwaniu tożsamości – ideologiczne inspiracje Samoobrony (1991–2007)". Praktyka Teoretyczna (in Polish). 48 (2): 39. doi:10.19195/prt.2023.2.2.
272. Mateusz Piskorski [in Polish] (2010). Samoobrona RP w polskim systemie partyjnym (in Polish) (Dissertation ed.). Poznań: Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań. p. 321.
273. Mateusz Piskorski [in Polish] (2010). Samoobrona RP w polskim systemie partyjnym (in Polish) (Dissertation ed.). Poznań: Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań. p. 322.
274. Uchwała IV Kongresu Samoobrony RP z dnia 24 maja 2003 r. w sprawie Polonii i Emigracji w służbie krajowi, Warszawa, 24.V.2003
275. P.G. Lewis, The EU and Party Politics in Central and Eastern Europe: Questions and Issues, [in:] P.G. Lewis, Z. Mansfeldová (ed.), The European Union and Party Politics in Central and Eastern Europe, Basingstoke 2006, p. 2
276. A. Batory, Attitudes to Europe. Ideology, Strategy and the Issue of European Union Membership in Hungarian Party Politics, “Party Politics”, vol. 8, No. 5, 2002, p. 528-529.
277. A. Szczerbiak, M. Bil, When in doubt, (re-) turn to domestic politics? The (non-) impact of the EU on party politics in Poland, Sussex European Institute Working Paper No 103, Brighton, 2008, p. 11.
278. Mateusz Piskorski [in Polish] (2010). Samoobrona RP w polskim systemie partyjnym (in Polish) (Dissertation ed.). Poznań: Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań. p. 324.
279. J. Sielski, Ewolucja poglądów polskich partii politycznych do integracji europejskiej, [in:] M. Musiał-Karg (ed.), Europa XXI wieku. Perspektywy i uwarunkowania integracji europejskiej, Poznań 2007, pp. 155-156, 163-164.
280. Mateusz Piskorski [in Polish] (2010). Samoobrona RP w polskim systemie partyjnym (in Polish) (Dissertation ed.). Poznań: Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań. p. 325. Sam przywódca Samoobrony wolał swoje stanowisko wobec udziału Polski w procesie integracji europejskiej określać mianem eurorealizmu, a ostrze krytyki z powodu niekorzystnych zapisów Traktatu akcesyjnego kierować raczej pod adresem polskich rządów i negocjatorów niż urzędników Komisji Europejskiej. Biorąc pod uwagę występowanie szeregu cech istotnie pozwalających na zaszeregowanie partii w gronie obozu eurorealistów (ambiwalentny stosunek do akcesji, drugoplanowa rola tej problematyki w enuncjacjach programowych, zmienność retoryki wynikająca z oceny nastrojów elektoratu), taka autoidentyfikacja wydaje się być w dużej mierze uzasadniona. [The leader of Self-Defence preferred to call his stance on Poland's participation in the European integration 'Eurorealism', and to direct his criticism of the unfavourable provisions of the Accession Treaty at Polish governments and negotiators rather than European Commission officials. Given the presence of a number of features which make it possible to place the party in the Eurorealist camp (ambivalent attitude to the accession, the secondary role of this issue in programme pronouncements, variability of rhetoric resulting from the assessment of the mood of the electorate), such self-identification seems to be largely justified.]
281. Euro bez pośpiechu, „Parkiet. Gazeta Giełdy”, 9.VII.2005
282. Unia jest OK.!, „Gazeta Wyborcza”, 6.X.2004
283. P. Osiewicz, Polskie stanowisko w kwestii przystąpienia Republiki Turcji do Unii Europejskiej, [in:] R. Paradowski (red.), Dylematy europejskie, Poznań 2007, p. 210.
284. A. Dudek, Nowa polityka wobec USA, „Fakt”, 10.XII.200
285. Mateusz Piskorski [in Polish] (2010). Samoobrona RP w polskim systemie partyjnym (in Polish) (Dissertation ed.). Poznań: Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań. p. 335.
286. Mateusz Piskorski [in Polish] (2010). Samoobrona RP w polskim systemie partyjnym (in Polish) (Dissertation ed.). Poznań: Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań. p. 336.
287. Nikolaus Werz [in German] (30 April 2003). Populismus: Populisten in Übersee und Europa. Analysen (in German). Vol. 79 (1 ed.). VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften Wiesbaden. p. 167. ISBN 978-3-663-11110-8.
288. Antonovič, Marijuš (2021). "A New Perspective on Poland's Policy towards Russia in 2005–2007: a Middle Power Attempts to Engage a Rising Major Power". Politics in Central Europe - the Journal of the Central European Political Science Association. 17 (1). Metropolitan University Prague Press: 18. doi:10.2478/pce-2021-0001. ISSN 1801-3422.
289. Mikhail Suslov; Marek Čejka [in Czech]; Vladimir Ðorđević (2023). Pan-Slavism and Slavophilia in Contemporary Central and Eastern Europe: Origins, Manifestations and Functions. pp. 168–170. doi:10.1007/978-3-031-17875-7. ISBN 978-3-031-17875-7.
290. White, Diana Petrova (2017). The Impact of Geography and Ethnicity on EU Enlargement: New Evidence from the Accession of Eastern Europe (Thesis). Georgia State University. p. 166. doi:10.57709/10110209.
291. "Wniosek o udostępnienie informacji publicznej - stanowisko partii" (in Polish). Retrieved 11 March 2024.
292. "Program Partii". samoobronarp.org (in Polish). 24 May 2023. Archived from the original on 11 March 2024. Retrieved 11 March 2024.
293. J. Czapnik, Z chłopską godnością i troską o Polskę, „Chłopska Droga”, 5.IV.1992
294. Mateusz Piskorski [in Polish] (2010). Samoobrona RP w polskim systemie partyjnym (in Polish) (Dissertation ed.). Poznań: Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań. p. 364.
295. Lang, Kai-Olaf (3 November 1999). "Bauernrevolte zwischen Oder und Bug? Andrzej Lepper und der Bauernbund Samoobrona" (PDF). Aktuelle Analysen / BIOst (in German). 46 (1999). Bundesinstitut für ostwissenschaftliche und internationale Studien: 2.
296. Uwe Backes; Eckhard Jesse (2006). Gefährdungen der Freiheit: Extremistische Ideologien im Vergleich. Schriften des Hannah-Arendt-Instituts (in German). Vol. 29. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht. pp. 337–338. ISBN 978-3-525-36905-0.
297. Oświadczenie o stosunku Samoobrony do Kościoła Katolickiego i jego Nauki Społecznej, Warszawa 14.I.1995.
298. List A. Leppera do Jego Eminencji Ks. Prymasa Józefa Glempa, Warszawa, 2.IX.1999
299. Mateusz Piskorski [in Polish] (2010). Samoobrona RP w polskim systemie partyjnym (in Polish) (Dissertation ed.). Poznań: Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań. p. 314.
300. Przyłęcki, Paweł (2012). Populizm w polskiej polityce: Analiza dyskursu polityki (in Polish). Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Sejmowe. p. 145. ISBN 9788376661858.
301. Przyłęcki, Paweł (2012). Populizm w polskiej polityce: Analiza dyskursu polityki (in Polish). Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Sejmowe. p. 149. ISBN 9788376661858.
302. Joshua Kjerulf Dubrow (8 August 2006). Enhancing Descriptive Representation in a New Democracy: A Political Market Approach (PDF) (Doctor of Philosophy thesis). Ohio State University. p. 59.
303. Gerald J. Beyer (2020). "Karol Wojtyła's Katolicka Etyka Społeczna as Precursor and Hermeneutic Key to Pope John Paul II's Economic Teaching". The American Journal of Economics and Sociology. 79 (4): 1111–1145. doi:10.1111/ajes.12358. S2CID 225220363.
304. Przyłęcki, Paweł (2012). Populizm w polskiej polityce: Analiza dyskursu polityki (in Polish). Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Sejmowe. pp. 139–142. ISBN 9788376661858.
305. R. Kluczna, Trzeba dopilnować interesów Ojczyzny, „Plon”, 12.IX.2004.
306. K. Gorlach, Nowe oblicze chłopstwa: protesty rolników polskich w latach 90., [w:] H. Domański (red.), Jak żyją Polacy, Warszawa 2000, p. 311
307. Andrzej Lepper (1993). Samoobrona - Dlaczego? Przed czym? (in Polish). Warsaw: Wyraz. p. 107. ISBN 9788390010021.
308. Andrzej Lepper (1993). Samoobrona - Dlaczego? Przed czym? (in Polish). Warsaw: Wyraz. pp. 41–42. ISBN 9788390010021.
309. Wojciechowski, Krzysztof (2018). Determinanty debaty politycznej nad kierunkami rozwoju oświaty w Polsce po 1989 roku (Doctor of Political Science thesis) (in Polish). Poznań. p. 379.
310. Ania Krok-Paszkowska; Petr Kopecky; Cas Mudde (2003). "Samoobrona: The Polish Self-Defence Movement". Uncivil Society? Contentious Politics in Post-Communist Europe. Routledge. p. 114. ISBN 9780203988787.
311. Rafal Soborski (2004). "Anti-globalism and ecologism in comparative perspective". In John Barry; Brian Baxter; Richard Dunphy (eds.). Europe, Globalization and Sustainable Development. London: Routledge. pp. 41–42. ISBN 0-203-49556-X.
312. Joe Bandy; Jackie Smith (2005). Coalitions across Borders: Transnational Protest and the Neoliberal Order. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers. p. 194. ISBN 0-7425-2396-9.
313. Joe Bandy; Jackie Smith (2005). Coalitions across Borders: Transnational Protest and the Neoliberal Order. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers. p. 200. ISBN 0-7425-2396-9.
314. Joe Bandy; Jackie Smith (2005). Coalitions across Borders: Transnational Protest and the Neoliberal Order. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers. p. 188. ISBN 0-7425-2396-9.
315. Rytel, Krzysztof (14 March 2000). "Federacja Zielonych razem z Samoobroną" (in Polish).
316. Swolkień, Olaf. "Bliska Egzotyka". Zielone Brygady. Pismo Ekologów. 7 (13399): 16–30.
317. Drozd-Piasecka, Mirosława (2001). "Andrzej Lepper - chłopski przywódca charyzmatyczny? Wizerunek medialny przewodniczącego "Samoobrony"". Etnografia Polska (in Polish). 45 (1–2): 66. ISSN 0071-1861.
318. "Lepper popiera Kaczyńskiego". wp.pl (in Polish). 18 October 2005.
319. "Popieramy". samoobrona.mazowsze.pl (in Polish). 20 May 2015. Archived from the original on 10 January 2017.
320. "Rosyjska telewizja ostro o Komorowskim. "Zapomniał zbrodnie nazistowskich oprawców"". tvn24.pl (in Polish). 6 April 2015.
321. "Poparcie Andrzeja Dudy w II turze wyborów". samoobrona.net.pl (in Polish). 9 July 2020. Archived from the original on 12 April 2023.
322. Tańska, Joanna (4 May 2003). "Rozwód z Samoobroną". Przegląd (in Polish).
323. "Informacje o Komitecie Wyborczym". pkw.gov.pl (in Polish). 5 December 2019.
324. "Ważne dni dla lewicy. Weekend zadecyduje o przetrwaniu?". newsweek.pl (in Polish). 15 July 2015.
325. Jakub Kamiński (22 December 2022). "Zmarł były poseł Samoobrony, przewodniczący partii. Miał 75 lat". rp.pl (in Polish). Retrieved 23 August 2023.
326. Magdalena Bojanowska (20 March 2023). "Samoobrona RP reaktywowana. Chce wystartować w wyborach. "Jesteśmy partią ludzkich spraw"". gazeta.pl (in Polish). Retrieved 23 August 2023.
327. Okraska, Remigiusz [in Polish] (6 August 2011). "Odpoczywaj w gniewie". Nowy Obywatel (in Polish).
328. Ania Krok-Paszkowska; Petr Kopecky; Cas Mudde (2003). "Samoobrona: The Polish Self-Defence Movement". Uncivil Society? Contentious Politics in Post-Communist Europe. Routledge. pp. 114–116. ISBN 9780203988787.
329. Madalena Pontes Meyer Resende (2004). An Ethos Theory of Party Positions on European Integration: Poland and Beyond (PDF). ProQuest LLC. pp. 151–159.
330. Gabriele Lesser (3 February 1999). "Polens radikaler Bauernführer". Die Tageszeitung: Taz (in German). p. 13.
331. Wos, Rafal (20 July 2007). "Der polnische Chavez". stern.de (in German).
332. Mareš, Miroslav; Laryš, Martin (2015). "The Transnational Relations of the Contemporary Russian Extreme Right". Europe-Asia Studies. 67 (7). JSTOR: 1056–78. doi:10.1080/09668136.2015.1067673. JSTOR 24537106.
333. "Wojciech Mojzesowicz wystąpił z PiS". gazetaprawna.pl (in Polish). 21 April 2009.
334. Maciej T. Nowak (27 July 2003). "Wyrzuceni z Samoobrony tworzą nową partię". gazeta.pl (in Polish). Opole.
335. "Pozycja 14243" (in Polish). Monitor Sądowy i Gospodarczy nr 56/2023. 21 March 2023.
336. "Witaszek objął Rację Stanu". polityka.pl (in Polish). 27 September 2003.
337. "Inicjatywa z Samoobrony". wp.pl (in Polish). 28 May 2004.
338. "Samoobrona-Odrodzenie wants to take MPs away from Lepper". wp.pl. 24 July 2007.
339. "Ruch Ludowo-Narodowy nielegalny?". rmf24.pl (in Polish). 25 September 2006.
340. Mateusz Piskorski [in Polish] (2010). Samoobrona RP w polskim systemie partyjnym (in Polish) (Dissertation ed.). Poznań: Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań. p. 81.
341. Nordsieck, Wolfram (7 February 2023). Parties and Elections in Europe: Parliamentary Elections and Governments since 1945 (7th ed.). Norderstedt: Books on Demand. p. 490. ISBN 978-3-7347-0669-1.
342. Mirosław Skowron (11 August 2011). "Henryk Dzido: Samoobrona będzie istnieć bez Leppera - Wywiad". se.pl (in Polish).
343. Grzegorz Łakomski (8 June 2017). "Only in WP. Jarosław Kaczyński can resurrect Samoobrona with one decision". wp.pl.
344. "Ważna debata ludzi lewicy". przeglad-socjalistyczny.pl (in Polish). Retrieved 2 September 2023.
345. "Pozycja 10088". Monitor Sądowy i Gospodarczy nr 56/2017. 21 March 2017.
346. Mucha, Wojciech (2014). Krew i ziemia. O ukraińskiej rewolucji (in Polish). Fronda. p. 171. ISBN 978-83-64095-58-0.
347. "Izdebski i Ikonowicz liderami Ruchu Społecznego RP". gazetaprawna.pl (in Polish). 9 August 2015.
348. "Będzie druga Samoobrona?! Izdebski: "Nie zakładam partii dla Kukiza"". wpolityce.pl (in Polish). 29 April 2015.
349. Diduszko-Zyglewska, Agata (1 September 2015). "Nosal-Ikonowicz o reprywatyzacji: Władza liczyła, że wszystko odbędzie się po cichu". krytykapolityczna.pl (in Polish).
350. "To koniec Ruchu Społecznego RP. Formacja Izdebskiego nie wystartuje w wyborach". gazetaprawna.pl (in Polish). 28 September 2015.
351. Mieczysław Rudy (7 August 2018). "Działacze Partii Chłopskiej mają wystartować do sejmików z list SLD". pap.pl (in Polish). Retrieved 28 August 2023.
352. "Media: PiS szuka nowych liderów na wsi wśród dawnych ludzi Leppera". tvn24.pl (in Polish). 3 March 2023.
353. Sitnicka, Dominika (27 February 2022). "Chłopak ze wsi i dziewczyna z miasta. AgroUnia i Porozumienie chcą iść po byłych wyborców PiS". OKO.press (in Polish).
354. Okoński, Grzegorz (21 December 2023). "Poseł z Wielkopolski, Michał Kołodziejczak, wiceministrem rolnictwa". gloswielkopolski.pl (in Polish).
355. "Lepper zakłada Samoobronę w Niemczech". wp.pl (in Polish). 23 August 2002.
356. Kącki, Marcin (2013). Lepperiada (in Polish). Wołowiec: Wydawnictwo Czarne. p. 85. ISBN 978-83-7536-583-2.
357. Czejarek, Roman; Szrubarz, Henryk (23 August 2002). "Niemiecka Samoobrona". samoobrona.org.pl (in Polish). Polskie Radio Program I. Archived from the original on 9 July 2004.
358. "Samoobrona, czyli Selbstverteidigung". Wprost (in Polish). 1 September 2002.
359. Polish Press Agency (23 August 2002). "Niemcy: Narodziny Samoobrony". eGospodarka (in Polish).
360. Mateusz Piskorski [in Polish] (2010). Samoobrona RP w polskim systemie partyjnym (in Polish) (Dissertation ed.). Poznań: Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań. p. 383.
361. P. Jendroszczyk (24 August 2002). "Lepper zignorowany w Berlinie". rp.pl (in Polish).
362. P. Jendroszczyk (24 December 2002). "Nie będzie niemieckiej Samoobrony". rp.pl (in Polish).
363. Flatau, Sabine; Rößling, Ingo (16 May 2004). "Treptow-Köpenick/Lichtenberg: Shopping arcade for products from Poland". Berliner Morgenpost.
364. "Dzienniczek Radwana". Dziennik Polski (in Polish). 24 August 2002.

External links

Media related to Samoobrona at Wikimedia Commons

• Samoobrona website