Non-governmental organization

"NGO" redirects here. For other uses, see NGO (disambiguation).

A non-governmental organization (NGO) (see spelling differences) is an organization that generally is formed independent from government.^{[2][3][4][5][6]} They are typically nonprofit entities, and many of them are active in humanitarianism or the social sciences; they can also include clubs and associations that provide services to their members and others. NGOs can also be lobby groups for corporations, such as the World Economic Forum.^{[7][8][9][10]} NGOs are distinguished from international and intergovernmental organizations (IOs) in that the latter are more directly involved with sovereign states and their governments.

Europe-Georgia Institute head George Melashvili addresses the audience at the launch of the "Europe in a suitcase" project by two NGOs (the EGI and the Friedrich Naumann Foundation), which aims to increase cooperation between European politicians, journalists and representatives of the civic sector and academia with their counterparts in Georgia.^[1]

The term as it is used today was first introduced in Article 71 of the newly formed United Nations' Charter in 1945.^[11] While there is no fixed or formal definition for what NGOs are, they are generally defined as nonprofit entities that are independent of governmental influence—although they may receive government funding.^[11]

According to the UN Department of Global Communications, an NGO is "a not-for profit, voluntary citizen's group that is organized on a local, national or international level to address issues in support of the public good".^[5] The term NGO is used inconsistently, and is sometimes used synonymously with civil society organization (CSO), which is any association founded by citizens.^[12] In some countries, NGOs are known as nonprofit organizations while political parties and trade unions are sometimes considered NGOs as well.^[13]

NGOs are classified by (1) orientation- entailing the type of activities an NGO undertakes, such as activities involving human rights, consumer protection, environmentalism, health, or development; and (2) level of operation, which indicates the scale at which an organization works: local, regional, national, or international.^[13]

Russia had about 277,000 NGOs in 2008.^[14] India is estimated to have had about 2 million NGOs in 2009 (approximately one per 600 Indians), many more than the number of the country's primary schools and health centers.^[15][16] The United States, by comparison, has approximately 1.5 million NGOs.^[17]

Types

NGOs further the social goals of their members (or founders): improving the natural environment, encouraging the observance of human rights, improving the welfare of the disadvantaged, or representing a corporate agenda. Their goals cover a wide range of issues. They may fund local NGOs, institutions and projects, and implement projects.^[18]

NGOs can be in the following ways;:^[13]

1. orientation, i.e. the type of activities an NGO undertakes, such as activities involving human rights, consumer protection, environmentalism, health, or development.
2. level of operation, which indicates the scale at which an organization works: local, regional, national, or international.

Orientation

• Charity — often a top-down effort, with little participation or input from beneficiaries. They include NGOs directed at meeting the needs of disadvantaged people and groups.
• Service — includes NGOs that provide healthcare (including family planning) and education.
• Participatory — self-help projects with local involvement in the form of money, tools, land, materials, or labor
• Empowerment — aim to help poor people to understand the social, political, and economic factors affecting their lives, and to increase awareness of their power to control their lives. With maximum involvement by the beneficiaries, the NGOs are facilitators.^[18]
• Professional (trade) union (association) – a voluntary association or union of people with common interests including spots, culture, others, i.e. Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences, FIFA

Level of operation

• Community-based organizations (CBOs) — popular initiatives which can raise the consciousness of the urban poor, helping them understand their right to services, and providing such services.
• City-wide organizations — include chambers of commerce and industry, coalitions of business, ethnic or educational groups, and community organizations.
• State NGOs — include state-level organizations, associations, and groups. Some state NGOs are guided by national and international NGOs.
• National NGOs — an NGO that exists in only one country.^[19] These include national organizations such as YMCAs and YWCAs, professional associations, and similar groups. Some have state or city branches, and assist local NGOs.
• International NGOs (INGOs) — range from secular agencies, such as Save the Children, to religious groups. They may fund local NGOs, institutions and projects, and implement projects.^[18]

Other terms/acronyms

Similar terms include third-sector organization (TSO), nonprofit organization (NPO), voluntary organization (VO), civil society organization (CSO), grassroots organization (GO), social movement organization (SMO), private voluntary organization (PVO), self-help organization (SHO), and non-state actors (NSAs). Numerous variations exist for the NGO acronym, either due to language, region, or specificity.^{[citation needed]}

Some Romance languages use the synonymous abbreviation ONG; for example:^{[citation needed]}

• French: organisation non gouvernementale
• Italian: organizzazione non governativa
• Portuguese: organização não governmental
• Spanish: organización no gubernamental
• Romanian: organizație neguvernamentală

Other acronyms that are typically used to describe non-governmental organizations include:^{[citation needed]}

• BINGO: Business-friendly international NGO or Big international NGO
• CSO: Civil society organization
• ENGO: Environmental NGO — organizations that advocate for the environment, such as Greenpeace and the WWF.^[20]
• DONGO: Donor-organized NGO
• GONGO: Government-organized non-governmental organization — often used derogatorily, these are government-backed NGOs that are set up to advocate on behalf of a repressive regime on the international stage.^[20]
• GSO: Grassroots Support Organization
• INGO: International NGO^[20]
• MANGO: Market advocacy NGO
• NGDO: Non-governmental development organization
• NNGO: Northern (UK) NGO
• PANGO: Party NGO — addressing political matters
• PVDO: Private voluntary development organization^[21] — the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) refers to NGOs as "private voluntary organizations".^[22]
• Quango: Quasi-autonomous NGO — often used derogatorily, these organizations rely on public funding.^[20] They are prevalent in the United Kingdom (where there are more than 1,200), Ireland, and the Commonwealth.
• SBO: Social benefit organization — a goal-oriented designation
• SCO: Social change organization
• SNGO: Southern (UK) NGO
• TANGO: Technical assistance NGO
• TNGO: Transnational NGO — coined during the 1970s due to the increase of environmental and economic issues in the global community. TNGOs exist in two (or more) countries.
• YOUNGO: Youth NGOs - advocacing for youth rights.

Activities

Non-governmental organizations (NGOs) play a vital role in improving the lives of people who have been affected by natural disasters or are facing other challenges. NGOs can act as implementers, catalysts, and partners to provide essential goods and services to those in need. They work to mobilize resources, both financial and human, to ensure that aid is delivered in a timely and effective manner.^{[citation needed]}

NGOs also play a critical role in driving change by advocating for policies and practices that benefit disadvantaged communities. They often work in partnership with other organizations, including government agencies, to address complex challenges that require a collaborative approach.^[23] One of the key strengths of NGOs is their ability to work at the grassroots level and to connect with communities directly. This allows them to gain a deep understanding of the issues facing people and to tailor their services to meet the specific needs of each community.^{[citation needed]}

NGOs vary by method; some are primarily advocacy groups, and others conduct programs and activities. Oxfam, concerned with poverty alleviation, may provide needy people with the equipment and skills to obtain food and drinking water; the Forum for Fact-finding Documentation and Advocacy (FFDA) helps provide legal assistance to victims of human-rights abuses. The Afghanistan Information Management Services provide specialized technical products and services to support development activities implemented on the ground by other organizations. Management techniques are crucial to project success.^[24]

The World Bank classifies NGO activity into two general categories:^[5][25][20]

1. operational NGOs, whose primary function is the design and implementation of development-related projects
2. advocacy NGOs, whose primary function is to defend or promote a particular cause and who seek to influence the policies and practices of International governmental organisations (IGOs).

NGOs may also conduct both activities: operational NGOs will use campaigning techniques if they face issues in the field, which could be remedied by policy change, and campaigning NGOs (such as human-rights organizations) often have programs which assist individual victims for whom they are trying to advocate.^[19][20]

Operational

Operational NGOs seek to "achieve small-scale change directly through projects",^[19] mobilizing financial resources, materials, and volunteers to create local programs. They hold large-scale fundraising events and may apply to governments and organizations for grants or contracts to raise money for projects. Operational NGOs often have a hierarchical structure; their headquarters are staffed by professionals who plan projects, create budgets, keep accounts, and report to and communicate with operational fieldworkers on projects.^[19] They are most often associated with the delivery of services or environmental issues, emergency relief, and public welfare. Operational NGOs may be subdivided into relief or development organizations, service-delivery or participatory, religious or secular, and public or private. Although operational NGOs may be community-based, many are national or international. The defining activity of an operational NGO is the implementation of projects.^[19]

Advocacy

Advocacy NGOs or campaigning NGOs seek to "achieve large-scale change promoted indirectly through the influence of the political system".^[19] They require an active, efficient group of professional members who can keep supporters informed and motivated. Campaigning NGOs must plan and host demonstrations and events which will attract media, their defining activity.^[19]

Campaigning NGOs often deal with issues related to human rights, women's rights, and children's rights, and their primary purpose is to defend (or promote) a specific cause.^[19]

Public relations

Non-governmental organisations need healthy public relations in order to meet their goals, and use sophisticated public-relations campaigns to raise funds and deal with governments. Interest groups may be politically important, influencing social and political outcomes. A code of ethics was established in 2002 by the World Association of Non-Governmental Organizations.^[26]

Structure

Staffing

Some NGOs rely on paid staff while others are based on volunteers. Although many NGOs use international staff in developing countries, others rely on local employees or volunteers. Foreign staff may satisfy a donor who wants to see the supported project managed by a person from an industrialized country. The expertise of these employees (or volunteers) may be counterbalanced by several factors, such as ; the cost of foreigners is typically higher, they have no grassroots connections in the country, and local expertise may be undervalued.^[25] By the end of 1995, Concern Worldwide (an international anti-poverty NGO) employed 174 foreigners and just over 5,000 local staff in Haiti and ten developing countries in Africa and Asia.^{[citation needed]}

On average, employees in NGOs earn 11-12% less compared to employees of for-profit organizations and government workers with the same number of qualifications .^[27] However, in many cases NGOs employees receive more fringe benefits.^[28]

Funding

See also: Foreign funding of NGOs

NGOs are usually funded by donations, but some avoid formal funding and are run by volunteers. NGOs may have charitable status, or may be tax-exempt in recognition of their social purposes. Others may be fronts for political, religious, or other interests. Since the end of World War II, NGOs have had an increased role in international development,^[29] particularly in the fields of humanitarian assistance and poverty alleviation.^[30]

Funding sources include membership dues, the sale of goods and services, grants from international institutions or national governments, corporate social responsibility (CSR) funds and private donations. Although the term "non-governmental organization" implies independence from governments, many NGOs depend on government funding;^[31] one-fourth of Oxfam's US$162 million 1998 income was donated by the British government and the EU, and World Vision United States collected $55 million worth of goods in 1998 from the American government. Several EU grants provide funds accessible to NGOs.^{[citation needed]}

Government funding of NGOs is controversial, since "the whole point of humanitarian intervention was precise that NGOs and civil society had both a right and an obligation to respond with acts of aid and solidarity to people in need or being subjected to repression or want by the forces that controlled them, whatever the governments concerned might think about the matter."^[32] Some NGOs, such as Greenpeace, do not accept funding from governments or intergovernmental organizations.^[33][34] The 1999 budget of the American Association of Retired Persons (AARP) was over $540 million.^[35]

In America, government funding of NGOs relating to immigration is common, and is one of the stated methods the Office of Refugee Resettlement uses to help integrate immigrants to America.^[36] Government funding sometimes accounts for the vast majority of overall funding for these NGOs, for example Global Refuge received 180 million dollars of its 207 million dollar budget from federal funding.^[37] In recent years, government contracts to non-profits have exploded both in number and size. The Budget for the Office of Refugee Resettlement has increased from 1.8 billion in 2018 to 6.3 billion in 2022.^[38] Critics point to the million-dollar salaries of CEOS and the use of funds for "music therapy" and "pet therapy" as a worrying sign that the money might not be appropriated to help the migrant crisis, but rather as a political move to keep wealthy backers loyal.^{[citation needed]}

Overhead

Overhead is the amount of money spent on running an NGO, rather than on projects.^[39] It includes office expenses,^[39] salaries, and banking and bookkeeping costs. An NGO's percentage of its overall budget spent on overhead is often used to judge it; less than four percent is considered good.^[39] According to the World Association of Non-Governmental Organizations, more than 86 percent should be spent on programs (less than 20 percent on overhead).^[40] The Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria has guidelines of five to seven percent overhead to receive funding;^[41] the World Bank typically allows 37 percent.^[42] A high percentage of overhead relative to total expenditures can make it more difficult to generate funds.^[43] High overhead costs may also generate public criticism.^[44]

A sole focus on overhead, however, can be counterproductive.^[45] Research published by the Urban Institute and Stanford University's Center for Social Innovation have shown that rating agencies create incentives for NGOs to lower (and hide) overhead costs, which may reduce organizational effectiveness by starving organizations of infrastructure to deliver services.^[46][47] An alternative rating system would provide, in addition to financial data, a qualitative evaluation of an organization's transparency and governance:

1. An assessment of program effectiveness
2. Evaluation of feedback mechanisms for donors and beneficiaries
3. Allowing a rated organization to respond to an evaluation by a rating agency^[48]

Monitoring and control

In a March 2000 report on United Nations reform priorities, former UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan favored international humanitarian intervention as the responsibility to protect^[49] citizens from ethnic cleansing, genocide, and crimes against humanity. After that report, the Canadian government launched its Responsibility to Protect (R2P)^[50] project outlining the issue of humanitarian intervention. The R2P project has wide applications, and among its more controversial has been the Canadian government's use of R2P to justify its intervention in the coup in Haiti.^[51]

Large corporations have increased their corporate social responsibility departments to preempt NGO campaigns against corporate practices. Collaboration between corporations and NGOs risks co-option of the weaker partner, typically the NGO.^[52]

In December 2007, Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs S. Ward Casscells established an International Health Division of Force Health Protection & Readiness.^[53] Part of International Health's mission is to communicate with NGOs about areas of mutual interest. Department of Defense Directive 3000.05,^[54] in 2005, required the US Defense Department to regard stability-enhancing activities as equally important as combat. In compliance with international law, the department has developed a capacity to improve essential services in areas of conflict (such as Iraq) where customary lead agencies like the State Department and USAID have difficulty operating. International Health cultivates collaborative, arm's-length relationships with NGOs, recognizing their independence, expertise, and honest-broker status.^{[citation needed]}

History

International non-governmental organizations date back to at least the late 18th century,^[55][56] and there were an estimated 1,083 NGOs by 1914.^[57] International NGOs were important to the anti-slavery and women's suffrage movements, and peaked at the time of the 1932–1934 World Disarmament Conference.^[58]

The term became popular with the 1945 founding of the United Nations in 1945;^[59] Article 71 in Chapter X of its charter^[60] stipulated consultative status for organizations which are neither governments nor member states.^[61] An international NGO was first defined in resolution 288 (X) of the United Nations Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC) on February 27, 1950, as "any international organization that is not founded by an international treaty". The role of NGOs and other "major groups" in sustainable development was recognized in Chapter 27^[62] of Agenda 21.^[63] The rise and fall of international NGOs matches contemporary events, waxing in periods of growth and waning in times of crisis.^[64] The United Nations gave non-governmental organizations observer status at its assemblies and some meetings. According to the UN, an NGO is a private, not-for-profit organization which is independent of government control and is not merely an opposition political party.^[65]

The rapid development of the non-governmental sector occurred in Western countries as a result of the restructuring of the welfare state. Globalization of that process occurred after the fall of the communist system, and was an important part of the Washington Consensus.^[31]

Twentieth-century globalization increased the importance of NGOs. International treaties and organizations, such as the World Trade Organization, focused on capitalist interests. To counterbalance this trend, NGOs emphasize humanitarian issues, development aid, and sustainable development. An example is the World Social Forum, a rival convention of the World Economic Forum held each January in Davos, Switzerland. The fifth World Social Forum, in Porto Alegre, Brazil in January 2005, was attended by representatives of over 1,000 NGOs.^[66] The 1992 Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro, attended by about 2,400 representatives, was the first to demonstrate the power of international NGOs in environmental issues and sustainable development. Transnational NGO networking has become extensive.^[67]

Legal status

Although NGOs are subject to national laws and practices, four main groups may be found worldwide:^[68]

• Unincorporated and voluntary association
• Trusts, charities, and foundations
• Not-for-profit companies and co-operatives
• Entities formed (or registered) under special NGO or nonprofit laws

The Council of Europe drafted the European Convention on the Recognition of the Legal Personality of International Non-Governmental Organisations in Strasbourg in 1986, creating a common legal basis for European NGOs. Article 11 of the European Convention on Human Rights protects the right to associate, which is fundamental for NGOs.

Economic theory

The question whether a public project should be owned by an NGO or by the government has been studied in economics using the tools of the incomplete contracting theory. According to this theory, not every detail of a relationship between decision makers can be contractually specified. Hence, in the future, the parties will bargain with each other to adapt their relationship to changing circumstances. Ownership matters because it determines the parties' willingness to make non-contractible investments. In the context of private firms, Oliver Hart has shown that the party with the more important investment task should be owner.^[69] Yet, Besley and Ghatak have argued that in the context of public projects the investment technology does not matter.^[70]

Specifically, even when the government is the key investor, ownership by an NGO is optimal if and only if the NGO has a larger valuation of the project than the government. However, the general validity of this argument has been questioned by follow-up research. In particular, ownership by the party with the larger valuation need not be optimal when the public good is partially excludable,^[71] when both NGO and government may be indispensable,^[72] or when the NGO and the government have different bargaining powers.^[73] Moreover, the investment technology can matter for the optimal ownership structure when there are bargaining frictions,^[74] when the parties interact repeatedly^[75] or when the parties are asymmetrically informed.^[76][77]

Influence on world affairs

World NGO Day 2014 in Afghanistan

Today we celebrate the World NGO Day, we celebrate the key civil society's contribution to public space and their unique ability to give voice to those who would have went [sic] otherwise unheard.

European Commission Vice-President Federica Mogherini, commemorating the 2017 World NGO Day in Brussels^[78]

Service-delivery NGOs provide public goods and services which governments of developing countries are unable to provide due to a lack of resources. They may be contractors or collaborate with government agencies to reduce the cost of public goods. Capacity-building NGOs affect "culture, structure, projects and daily operations".^[79]

Advocacy and public-education NGOs aim to modify behavior and ideas through communication, crafting messages to promote social, political, or environmental changes (and as news organisations have cut foreign bureaux, many NGOs have begun to expand into news reporting).^[80] Movement NGOs mobilize the public and coordinate large-scale collective activities to advance an activist agenda.^[81]

Since the end of the Cold War, more NGOs in developed countries have pursued international outreach. By being involved in local and national social resistance, they have influenced domestic policy change in the developing world.^[82] Specialized NGOs have forged partnerships, built networks, and found policy niches.^[83]

Track II diplomacy

Track II diplomacy (or dialogue) is transnational coordination by non-official members of the government, including epistemic communities and former policymakers or analysts. It aims to help policymakers and policy analysts reach a common solution through unofficial discussions. Unlike official diplomacy, conducted by government officials, diplomats, and elected leaders, Track II diplomacy involves experts, scientists, professors and other figures who are not part of government affairs.^{[citation needed]}

World NGO Day

World NGO Day, which is observed annually on 27 February, was recognised on 17 April 2010 by 12 countries of the IX Baltic Sea NGO Forum at the eighth Summit of the Baltic Sea States in Vilnius, Lithuania.^[84] It was internationally recognised on 28 February 2014 in Helsinki, Finland by United Nations Development Programme administrator and former Prime Minister of New Zealand Helen Clark.^[85][86][87]

Diplomacy

In the context of NGOs (Non-Governmental Organizations), diplomacy refers to the practice of building and maintaining partnerships with other organizations, stakeholders, and governments to achieve common objectives related to social or environmental issues.^{[citation needed]}

NGOs often work in complex environments, where multiple stakeholders have different interests and goals. Diplomacy allows NGOs to navigate these complex environments and engage in constructive dialogue with different actors to promote understanding, build consensus, and facilitate cooperation.^{[citation needed]}

Effective NGO diplomacy involves building trust, fostering dialogue, and promoting transparency and accountability. NGOs may engage in diplomacy through various means such as including advocacy, lobbying, partnerships, and negotiations. By working collaboratively with other organizations and stakeholders, NGOs can achieve greater impact and reach their goals more effectively.^{[citation needed]}

Criticism

Tanzanian author and academic Issa G. Shivji has criticised NGOs in two essays: "Silences in NGO discourse: The role and future of NGOs in Africa" and "Reflections on NGOs in Tanzania: What we are, what we are not and what we ought to be". Shivji writes that despite the good intentions of NGO leaders and activists, he is critical of the "objective effects of actions, regardless of their intentions".^[88] According to Shivji, the rise of NGOs is part of a neoliberal paradigm and not motivated purely by altruism; NGOs want to change the world without understanding it, continuing an imperial relationship.^{[citation needed]}

In his study of NGO involvement in Mozambique, James Pfeiffer addresses their negative effects on the country's health. According to Pfeiffer, NGOs in Mozambique have "fragmented the local health system, undermined local control of health programs, and contributed to growing local social inequality".^[89] They can be uncoordinated, creating parallel projects which divert health-service workers from their normal duties to instead serve the NGOs. This undermines local primary-healthcare efforts, and removes the government's ability to maintain agency over its health sector.^[89] Pfeiffer suggested a collaborative model of the NGO and the DPS (the Mozambique Provincial Health Directorate); the NGO should be "formally held to standard and adherence within the host country", reduce "showcase" projects and unsustainable parallel programs.^[89]

In her 1997 Foreign Affairs article, Jessica Mathews wrote: "For all their strengths, NGOs are special interests. The best of them ... often suffer from tunnel vision, judging every public act by how it affects their particular interest".^[90] NGOs are unencumbered by policy trade-offs.^[91]

According to Vijay Prashad, since the 1970s "the World Bank, under Robert McNamara, championed the NGO as an alternative to the state, leaving intact global and regional relations of power and production."^[92] NGOs have been accused of preserving imperialism^[93] (sometimes operating in a racialized manner in Third World countries), with a function similar to that of the clergy during the colonial era. Political philosopher Peter Hallward has called them an aristocratic form of politics,^[94] noting that ActionAid and Christian Aid "effectively condoned the [2004 US-backed] coup" against an elected government in Haiti and are the "humanitarian face of imperialism".^[95] Movements in the Global South (such as South Africa's Western Cape Anti-Eviction Campaign) have refused to work with NGOs, concerned that doing so would compromise their autonomy.^[96][97] NGOs have been accused of weakening people by allowing their funders to prioritize stability over social justice.^[98]

Workers from an NGO participating in local community work - some critics allege that NGOs prioritize their special interests over community wellbeing.

They have been accused of being designed by, and used as extensions of, the foreign-policy instruments of some Western countries and groups of countries.^[99][100] Russian president Vladimir Putin made that accusation at the 43rd Munich Security Conference in 2007, saying that NGOs "are formally independent but they are purposefully financed and therefore under control".^[101] According to Michael Bond, "Most large NGOs, such as Oxfam, the Red Cross, Cafod and ActionAid, are striving to make their aid provision more sustainable. But some, mostly in the US, are still exporting the ideologies of their backers."^[102]

NGOs have been accused of using misinformation in their campaigns out of self-interest. According to Doug Parr of Greenpeace, there had been "a tendency among our critics to say that science is the only decision-making tool ... but political and commercial interests are using science as a cover for getting their way."^[103] Former policy-maker for the German branch of Friends of the Earth Jens Katjek said, "If NGOs want the best for the environment, they have to learn to compromise."^[103]

They have been questioned as "too much of a good thing".^[104] Eric Werker and Faisal Ahmed made three critiques of NGOs in developing nations. Too many NGOs in a nation (particularly one ruled by a warlord) reduces an NGO's influence, since it can easily be replaced by another NGO. Resource allocation and outsourcing to local organizations in international-development projects incurs expenses for an NGO, lessening the resources and money available to the intended beneficiaries. NGO missions tend to be paternalistic, as well as expensive.^[104]

Legitimacy, an important asset of an NGO, is its perception as an "independent voice".^[105][106] Neera Chandhoke wrote in a Journal of World-Systems Research article, "To put the point starkly: are the citizens of countries of the South and their needs represented in global civil society, or are citizens as well as their needs constructed by practices of representation? And when we realize that INGOs hardly ever come face to face with the people whose interests and problems they represent, or that they are not accountable to the people they represent, matters become even more troublesome."^[107]

An NGO's funding affects its legitimacy, and they have become increasingly dependent on a limited number of donors.^[108] Competition for funds has increased, in addition to the expectations of donors who may add conditions threatening an NGO's independence.^[109] Dependence on official aid may dilute "the willingness of NGOs to speak out on issues which are unpopular with governments",^[106] and changes in NGO funding sources have altered their function.^[106]

NGOs have been challenged as not representing the needs of the developing world, diminishing the "Southern voice" and preserving the North–South divide.^[110] The equality of relationships between northern and southern parts of an NGO, and between southern and northern NGOs working in partnership, has been questioned; the north may lead in advocacy and resource mobilization, and the south delivers services in the developing world.^[110] The needs of the developing world may not be addressed appropriately, as northern NGOs do not consult (or participate in) partnerships or assign unrepresentative priorities.^[111] NGOs have been accused of damaging the public sector in target countries, such as mismanagement resulting in the breakdown of public healthcare systems.^[89]

The scale and variety of activities in which NGOs participate have grown rapidly since 1980, and particularly since 1990.^[112] NGOs need to balance centralization and decentralization. Centralizing NGOs, particularly at the international level, can assign a common theme or set of goals. It may also be advantageous to decentralize an NGO, increasing its chances of responding flexibly and effectively to local issues by implementing projects which are modest in scale, easily monitored, produce immediate benefits, and where all involved know that corruption would be punished.^[113]

See also

• Foreign funding of NGOs
• Advocacy group (interest group)
• Charitable organization
• Community foundation
• Government-organized non-governmental organization (GONGO)
• International organization
• NGO-ization
• List of active NGOs of national minorities
• Category:Non-governmental organizations
• Quango

References

1. "Europe in a suitcase: Oliver Wardrop Discussions". Europe-Georgia Institute. 29 October 2019. Retrieved 31 March 2021.
2. Church, Jim (26 August 2021). "Library Guides:Governmental Organizations (NGOs): Introduction". guides.lib.berkeley.edu. Archived from the original on 26 August 2021. Retrieved 26 August 2021.
3. "NGO", Macmillan Dictionary
4. Claiborne, N (2004). "Presence of social workers in nongovernment organizations". Soc Work. 49 (2): 207–218. doi:10.1093/sw/49.2.207. PMID 15124961.
5. Leverty, Sally (2008). "NGOs, the UN and APA". American Psychological Association. Retrieved 12 August 2021.
6. Horowitz, Jason (11 August 2017). "Ship Monitoring Rescues of Migrants Refuses to Be Rescued". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 22 November 2019.
7. "Nongovernmental Organization (NGO)". United States Institute of Peace.
8. Karns, Margaret P. (23 October 2023). "Nongovernmental organization". Encyclopaedia Britannica.
9. "NGO – meaning in the Cambridge English Dictionary". dictionary.cambridge.org.
10. "NGO". Lexico UK English Dictionary. Oxford University Press. Archived from the original on 5 March 2020.
11. "What is an NGO? What role does it play in civil society? | Knowledge base". Candid Learning. Retrieved 12 August 2021.
12. "Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) in the United States" (fact sheet). 20 January 2017. Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor. U.S. Department of State. state.gov. Retrieved 21 September 2017.
13. Vakil, Anna (December 1997). "Confronting the classification problem: Toward a taxonomy of NGOs". World Development. 25 (12): 2057–2070. doi:10.1016/S0305-750X(97)00098-3.
14. "Hobbled NGOs wary of Medvedev". Chicago Tribune. 7 May 2008. Archived from the original on 4 March 2016. Retrieved 7 October 2011.
15. "India: More NGOs, than schools and health centres". OneWorld.net. 7 July 2010. Archived from the original on 25 August 2011. Retrieved 7 October 2011.
16. "First official estimate: An NGO for every 400 people in India". The Indian Express. 7 July 2010.
17. "US Department of State". Retrieved 11 January 2023.
18. Lawry, Lynn (2009). Guide to Nongovernmental Organizations for the Military (PDF). pp. 29–30. Archived from the original (PDF) on 30 July 2013.
19. Willetts, Peter. "What is a Non-Governmental Organization?". UNESCO Encyclopaedia of Life Support Systems. City University London. Retrieved 18 July 2012.
20. Folger, Jean (18 January 2021). "What is an NGO (Non-Governmental Organization)?". Investopedia. Retrieved 12 August 2021.
21. Lewis, David; Kanji, Nazneen (2009). Non-governmental organizations and development. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. pp. 9–10. ISBN 978-0-203-87707-4.
22. "Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs)". www.usaid.gov. 25 September 2017. Retrieved 12 September 2018.
23. "NGO in Kanpur". 29 January 2022. Archived from the original on 5 February 2022.
24. 100 LSE.ac.uk Archived 11 October 2009 at the Wayback Machine, Mukasa, Sarah. Are expatriate staff necessary in international development NGOs? A case study of an international NGO in Uganda. Publication of the Centre for Civil Society at the London School of Economics. 2002, p. 11-13.
25. World Bank Criteria defining NGO Archived 21 June 2007 at the Wayback Machine
26. "World Association of Non-Governmental Organizations – Code of Ethics and Conduct for NGOs". www.wango.org. Retrieved 5 April 2020.
27. Preston, Anne E.; Sacks, Daniel W. (2010). "Nonprofit Wages: Theory and Evidence". Handbook of Research on Nonprofit Economics and Management. doi:10.4337/9781849803526.00017. hdl:10419/161194. ISBN 9781849803526.
28. Ben-Ner, Avner; Ren, Ting; Paulson, Darla Flint (13 April 2010). "A Sectoral Comparison of Wage Levels and Wage Inequality in Human Services Industries". Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly. 40 (4): 608–633. doi:10.1177/0899764010365012. ISSN 0899-7640. S2CID 1222873.
29. Werker, Eric; Ahmed, Faisal Z. (2008). "What Do Nongovernmental Organizations Do?". Journal of Economic Perspectives. 22 (2): 74–75. doi:10.1257/jep.22.2.73.
30. Werker, Eric; Ahmed, Faisal Z. (2008). "What Do Nongovernmental Organizations Do?". Journal of Economic Perspectives. 22 (2): 74. doi:10.1257/jep.22.2.73.
31. Pawel Zaleski Global Non-governmental Administrative System: Geosociology of the Third Sector, [in:] Gawin, Dariusz & Glinski, Piotr [ed.]: "Civil Society in the Making", IFiS Publishers, Warsaw (2006)
32. David Rieff (10 June 2010). "NG-Uh-O – The trouble with humanitarianism". The New Republic. Archived from the original on 5 April 2023.
33. Sarah Jane Gilbert; Ramon Casadesus-Masanell; Jordan Mitchell (8 September 2008). "HBS Cases: The Value of Environmental Activists". Harvard Business School Working Knowledge. Archived from the original on 10 October 2009. Retrieved 20 December 2011.
34. "08 Annual Report" (PDF). Greenpeace. Archived from the original (PDF) on 30 December 2009. Retrieved 24 December 2013.
35. "Poll shows power of AIPAC drops slightly". Jewish News Weekly of Northern California. 19 December 1999. Archived from the original on 30 September 2007. Retrieved 25 June 2007.
36. "GENERAL BACKGROUND". OFFICE OF REFUGEE RESETTLEMENT. Administration for children and families. Retrieved 15 May 2024.
37. "Lutheran Immigration And Refugee Service". ProPublica. Retrieved 15 May 2024.
38. "Report claims nonprofits in Texas, Arizona are making billions off the migrant crisis". MSN. MSN. Retrieved 15 May 2024.
39. "Defining certain terms in a budget". Funds for NGOs. 18 September 2011. Archived from the original on 13 January 2014. Retrieved 24 December 2013.
40. "Code of Ethics & Conduct for NGOs Compliance Manual" (PDF). World Association of Non-Governmental Organizations. Archived (PDF) from the original on 1 April 2010. Retrieved 11 April 2012.
41. Garmaise, David (24 January 2012). "National NGOs Serving as PRs Excluded from the Global Fund's Policy on Percentage-Based Overhead Costs". Aidspan. Archived from the original on 27 September 2013.
42. Gibbs, Christopher; Fumo, Claudia; Kuby, Thomas (1999). Nongovernmental organizations in World Bank supported projects : a review (2nd ed.). Washington, D.C.: World Bank. p. 21. ISBN 978-0-8213-4456-9.
43. Aras, Güler; Crowther, David, eds. (2010). NGOs and social responsibility (1st ed.). Bingley, UK: Emerald. p. 121. ISBN 978-0-85724-295-2.
44. Kassahun, Samson (2004). Social capital for synergistic partnership : development of poor localities in urban Ethiopia (1. Aufl. ed.). Göttingen: Cuvillier. p. 153. ISBN 978-3-86537-222-2.
45. Schmitz, Hans Peter and George E. Mitchell 2010. Navigating Effectiveness, Humanitarian&Development NGOs Domain Blog, The Hauser Center for Nonprofit Organizations, Harvard University (9 March)
46. "The Pros and Cons of Financial Efficiency Standards". 4 June 2016. Archived from the original on 26 April 2013. Retrieved 29 November 2012.
47. "The Ratings Game (SSIR)".
48. Lowell, Stephanie, Brian Trelstad, and Bill Meehan. 2005. The Ratings Game. Evaluating the three groups that rate the Charities. Stanford Social Innovation Review: 39–45.
49. "Background Information on the Responsibility to Protect — Outreach Programme on the Rwanda Genocide and the United Nations". Un.org. Retrieved 24 December 2013.
50. "International Coalition for the Responsibility to Protect (ICRtoP)". Responsibilitytoprotect.org. Archived from the original on 13 May 2020. Retrieved 24 December 2013.
51. Engler, Fenton; Yves, Anthony (2005). Canada in Haiti: Waging War on the Poor Majority. Vancouver, Winnipeg: RED Publishing. p. 120. ISBN 978-1-55266-168-0. Archived from the original on 6 October 2011. Retrieved 30 October 2011.
52. Baur, Dorothea; Schmitz, Hans Peter (2012). "Corporations and NGOs: When Accountability Leads to Co-optation" (PDF). Journal of Business Ethics. 106 (1): 9–21. doi:10.1007/s10551-011-1057-9. S2CID 154450479. Archived (PDF) from the original on 31 March 2019.
53. "Force Health Protection & Readiness - December 08, 2006". Archived from the original on 8 December 2006. Retrieved 1 March 2008.
54. "Department of Defense Directive 3000.05" (PDF). United States Department of Defense. 16 September 2009. Archived from the original (PDF) on 15 October 2010. Retrieved 24 December 2013.
55. Davies, Thomas (2014). NGOs: A New History of Transnational Civil Society. New York: Oxford University Press. p. 23. ISBN 978-0-19-938753-3.
56. Steve Charnovitz, "Two Centuries of Participation: NGOs and International Governance, Michigan Journal of International Law, Winter 1997.
57. Oliver P. Richmond; Henry F. Carey, eds. (2005). Subcontracting Peace – The Challenges of NGO Peacebuilding. Ashgate. p. 21.
58. Davies, Thomas Richard (2007). The Possibilities of Transnational Activism: the Campaign for Disarmament between the Two World Wars. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers. ISBN 978-90-04-16258-7.^{[page needed]}
59. Davies, Thomas (2014). NGOs: A New History of Transnational Civil Society. New York: Oxford University Press. p. 3. ISBN 978-0-19-938753-3.
60. "Charter of the United Nations: Chapter X". Archived from the original on 22 March 2004.
61. Götz, Norbert (1 June 2008). "Reframing NGOs: The Identity of an International Relations Non-Starter". European Journal of International Relations. 14 (2): 231–258. doi:10.1177/1354066108089242. ISSN 1354-0661. S2CID 145277588.
62. United Nations Conference on Environment and Development. "Agenda 21 – Chapter 27: Strengthening the Role of Non-governmental Organizations: Partners for Sustainable Development, Earth Summit, 1992". Habitat.igc.org. Archived from the original on 17 February 2003. Retrieved 20 December 2011.
63. "1996/31. Consultative relationship between the United Nations and non-governmental organizations". Un.org. Retrieved 20 December 2011.
64. Boli, J. and Thomas, G. M. (1997) World Culture in the World Polity: A century of International Non-Governmental Organization. American Sociological Review. pp. 177
65. "United Nations: Definitions and Terms" (PDF).
66. Bartlett, Lauren (2005). "NGO Update". Human Rights Brief. 12 (3): 44–45.
67. Stone, Diane (2004). "Transfer Agents and Global Networks in the 'Transnationalisation' of Policy" (PDF). Journal of European Public Policy.austiniskewl. 11 (3): 545–566. doi:10.1080/13501760410001694291. S2CID 153837868. Archived (PDF) from the original on 16 December 2011.
68. Stillman, Grant B. (2007). Global Standard NGOs: The Essential Elements of Good Practice. Geneva: Lulu: Grant B. Stillman. pp. 13–14.
69. Hart, Oliver D. (1995). Firms, contracts, and financial structure. Oxford: Clarendon Press. ISBN 0-19-828881-6. OCLC 32703648.
70. Besley, Timothy; Ghatak, Maitreesh (2001). "Government Versus Private Ownership of Public Goods". The Quarterly Journal of Economics. 116 (4): 1343–1372. doi:10.1162/003355301753265598. ISSN 0033-5533. S2CID 39187118.
71. Francesconi, Marco; Muthoo, Abhinay (2011). "Control Rights in Complex Partnerships". Journal of the European Economic Association. 9 (3): 551–589. doi:10.1111/j.1542-4774.2011.01017.x. ISSN 1542-4766.
72. Halonen-Akatwijuka, Maija (2012). "Nature of human capital, technology and ownership of public goods". Journal of Public Economics. Fiscal Federalism. 96 (11): 939–945. doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2012.07.005. hdl:1983/9197910f-4a3f-4ff3-8d8a-20a204ec2dda. ISSN 0047-2727. S2CID 154075467.
73. Schmitz, Patrick W. (2013). "Incomplete contracts and optimal ownership of public goods". Economics Letters. 118 (1): 94–96. doi:10.1016/j.econlet.2012.09.033. ISSN 0165-1765. S2CID 53520873.
74. Schmitz, Patrick W. (2015). "Government versus private ownership of public goods: The role of bargaining frictions". Journal of Public Economics. 132: 23–31. doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2015.09.009. ISSN 0047-2727. S2CID 155401327.
75. Halonen-Akatwijuka, Maija; Pafilis, Evagelos (2020). "Common ownership of public goods". Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization. 180: 555–578. doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2020.10.002. hdl:1983/d4ab15e6-27ed-40ce-ae87-62d296e07181. ISSN 0167-2681. S2CID 169842255.
76. Schmitz, Patrick W. (2021). "Optimal ownership of public goods under asymmetric information". Journal of Public Economics. 198: 104424. doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2021.104424. ISSN 0047-2727. S2CID 236397476.
77. Schmitz, Patrick W. (2024). "When should the government own the physical assets needed to provide public goods?". Economics Letters. 241: 111830. doi:10.1016/j.econlet.2024.111830.
78. "Statement on the occasion of the World NGO Day 2017". eeas.europa.eu. Retrieved 27 February 2017.
79. Roberts, Susan G.; Jones III, John P.; Frohling, Oliver (2005). "NGOs and the Globalization of Managerialism: A Research Framework". World Development. 33 (11). Great Britain: 1846. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2005.07.004.
80. Kate, Wright (2018). Who's Reporting Africa Now? Non-Governmental Organizations, Journalists, and Multimedia. Oxford: Peter Lang. ISBN 978-1-4331-5106-4.
81. Mati, Jacob Mwathi; Wu, Fengshi; Edwards, Bob; El Taraboulsi, Sherine N.; Smith, David H. (2016). "Social Movements and Activist-Protest Volunteering". The Palgrave Handbook of Volunteering, Civic Participation, and Nonprofit Associations. London: Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 516–538. doi:10.1007/978-1-137-26317-9_25. ISBN 978-1-137-26316-2.
82. {Keck, Margaret, and Kathryn Sikkink, 1998. Activists beyond borders: Advocacy networks in international politics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.}
83. Wu, Fengshi (2005). "International Non-Governmental Actors in HIV/AIDS Prevention in China". Cell Research. 15 (11–12): 919–922. doi:10.1038/sj.cr.7290369. PMID 16354570.
84. "Resolution of the IX Baltic Sea NGO Forum to the 8th Summit of the Baltic Sea States due on 1-2 June 2010". Baltic Sea NGO Forum 2010. 3sektorius. 17 April 2010. Archived from the original on 20 December 2016.
85. "The Week Ahead at the United Nations: the European Perspective (07/14): 17–24 February 2014". United Nations Regional Information Centre for Western Europe. Archived from the original on 16 September 2016. Retrieved 14 September 2018.
86. "World NGO Day - International Celebration and Recognition". FINNBAY. 6 March 2014. Archived from the original on 5 August 2016. Retrieved 10 September 2016.
87. "Helen Clark on World NGO Day". United Nations Development Programme. 27 February 2014. Archived from the original on 12 October 2022 – via YouTube.
88. Shivji, Issa G. (2007). Silence in NGO discourse: the role and future of NGOs in Africa. Oxford, UK: Fahamu. p. 84. ISBN 978-0-9545637-5-2.
89. Pfeiffer, J (2003). "International NGOs and primary health care in Mozambique: the need for a new model of collaboration". Social Science & Medicine. 56 (4): 725–738. doi:10.1016/s0277-9536(02)00068-0. PMID 12560007.
90. Jessica T. Mathews (January–February 1997). "Power Shift". Foreign Affairs (January/February 1997). Retrieved 1 June 2012.
91. Bond, M. (2000) "The Backlash against NGOs". Prospect.
92. "Mother Teresa: A Communist View". Archived from the original on 24 July 2008. Retrieved 24 July 2008., Vijay Prashad, Australian Marxist Review, No. 40 August 1998
93. Abahlali baseMjondolo, "Rethinking Public Participation from below" Archived 22 March 2010 at the Wayback Machine, Critical Dialogue (2006)
94. Hallward, Peter (April 2008). Damming the Flood: Haiti and the Politics of Containment. London: Verso. ISBN 9781844672349.
95. "Peter Hallward responds to BBC Radio 4 program on Haiti", Tanbou, 11 January 2011.
96. "Building unity in diversity: Social movement activism in the Western Cape Anti-Eviction Campaign", Sophie Oldfield and Kristian Stokke, 2004.
97. Crump, Marlon (18 November 2009). "Ashraf Cassiem: South African Resistance Against Evictions". Poor Magazine. Archived from the original on 7 September 2012.
98. Appasamy, Youlendree (3 July 2013). "Are NGOs enemies of SA's rural folk?". Grocott's Mail. Archived from the original on 22 September 2013.
99. O'Connor, Jenny (15 April 2012). "NGO: The Guise of Innocence". New Left Project. Archived from the original on 5 May 2014.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: unfit URL (link)
100. Topping, Alexandra; Elder, Miriam (19 January 2012). "Britain admits 'fake rock' plot to spy on Russians". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 3 March 2024.
101. Putin, Vladimir (10 February 2007). Speech and the Following Discussion at the Munich Conference on Security Policy (Speech). 43rd Munich Conference on Security Policy. Munich, Germany. Archived from the original on 9 March 2012. Retrieved 28 February 2012 – via President of Russia.
102. Bond, Michael. "The Backlash against NGOs". Prospect, April 2000, pp.321. Print.
103. Bond, Michael (April 2000), "The Backlash against NGOs", Prospect, p. 323, archived from the original on 5 April 2023
104. Werker, Eric; Ahmed, Faisal Z. (2008). "What Do Nongovernmental Organizations Do?" (PDF). Journal of Economic Perspectives. 22 (2): 73–92. doi:10.1257/jep.22.2.73. S2CID 154246603. Archived from the original (PDF) on 4 August 2020.
105. Weber, N.; Christopherson, T. (2002). "The influence of non-governmental organizations on the creation of Natura 2000 during the European policy process". Forest Policy and Economics. 4 (1): 1–12. doi:10.1016/s1389-9341(01)00070-3.
106. Edwards, M. and Hulme, D. (2002) NGO Performance and Accountability: Introduction and Overview. "In Edwards, M. and Hulme, D., ed. 2002." The Earthscan Reader on NGO Management. UK: Earthscan Publications Ltd. Chapter 11.
107. Chandhoke, Neera (2005). "How Global Is Global Civil Society?". Journal of World-Systems Research. 11 (2): 326–327. doi:10.5195/JWSR.2005.388.
108. Edwards, M. and Hulme, D. (1996) Too Close for comfort? The impact of official aid on Non-Governmental Organisations. "World Development." 24(6), pp. 961–973.
109. Ebrahim, A. (2003) "Accountability in practice: Mechanisms for NGOs". World Development 31(5), pp. 813–829.
110. Lindenberg, M. and Bryant, C. (2001) Going Global: Transforming Relief and Development NGOs. Bloomfield: Kumarian Press.
111. , Jenkins, R. (2001) "Corporate Codes of Conduct: Self-Regulation in a Global Economy". Technology, Business and Society Programme Paper Number 2. United Nations Research Institute for Social Development.
112. Avina, J. (1993) The Evolutionary Life Cycles if Non-Governmental Development Organisations. "Public Administration and Development." 13(5), pp. 453–474.
113. Anheier, H. and Themudo, N. (2002) Organisational forms of global civil society: Implications of going global. In: Anheier, H. Glasius, M. Kaldor, M, ed 2002.

Further reading

• Norbert Götz. "Reframing NGOs: The Identity of an International Relations Non-Starter." European Journal of International Relations 14 (2008) 2: 231–258.
• Norbert Götz. "Civil Society and NGO: Far from Unproblematic Concepts." The Ashgate Research Companion to Non-State Actors. Bob Reinalda (ed.). Aldershot: Ashgate, 2011. 185–196.
• Hilton, Matthew et al. eds. The Politics of Expertise: How NGOs Shaped Modern Britain (2013)
• Watkins; Cotts, Susan; Swidler, Ann; Hannan, Thomas (2012). "Outsourcing Social Transformation: Development NGOs as Organizations". Annual Review of Sociology. 38: 285–315. doi:10.1146/annurev-soc-071811-145516.
• Davies, T. 2014. NGOs: A New History of Transnational Civil Society. New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-938753-3.
• Velusamy M. Non-Governmental Organisation, Dominant Publishers & Distribution Ltd, New Delhi
• Mark Butler, with Thulani Ndlazi, David Ntseng, Graham Philpott, and Nomusa Sokhela. NGO Practice and the Possibility of Freedom Church Land Programme, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa 2007 Churchland.co.za
• Olivier Berthoud, NGOs: Somewhere between Compassion, Profitability and Solidarity Envio.org.ni, PDF Edinter.net Envio, Managua, 2001
• Terje Tvedt, 19982/2003: Angels of Mercy or Development Diplomats. NGOs & Foreign Aid, Oxford: James Currey
• Steve W. Witt, ed. Changing Roles of NGOs in the Creation, Storage, and Dissemination of Information in Developing Countries (Saur, 2006). ISBN 3-598-22030-8
• Cox, P. N. Shams, G. C. Jahn, P. Erickson, and P. Hicks. 2002. Building collaboration between NGOs and agricultural research iNGOs – Die Gewerkschaften in Guinea während der Unruhen 2007 – EPU Research Papers: Issue 03/07, Stadtschlaining 2007 (in German)
• Lyal S. Sunga, "Dilemmas facing INGOs in coalition-occupied Iraq", in Ethics in Action: The Ethical Challenges of International Human Rights Nongovernmental Organizations, edited by Daniel A. Bell and Jean-Marc Coicaud, Cambridge Univ. and United Nations Univ. Press, 2007.
• Lyal S. Sunga, "NGO Involvement in International Human Rights Monitoring, International Human Rights Law and Non-Governmental Organizations" (2005) 41–69.
• Werker & Ahmed (2008): What do Non-Governmental Organizations do?
• Charnovitz, Steve (1997). "Two Centuries of Participation: NGOs and International Governance". Michigan Journal of International Law. 18: 183–286.
• Abahlali baseMjondolo Rethinking Public Participation from Below, 'Critical Dialogue', 2006
• Akpan S. M (2010): Establishment of Non-Governmental Organizations (In Press).
• Edward A. L. Turner (2010) Why Has the Number of International Non-Governmental Organizations Exploded since 1960?, Cliodynamics, 1, (1).
• Eugene Fram & Vicki Brown, How Using the Corporate Model Makes a Nonprofit Board More Effective & Efficient – Third Edition (2011), Amazon Books, Create Space Books.
• David Lewis and Nazneen Kanji (2009): Non-Governmental Organizations and Development. New York: Routledge.
• Issa G. Shivji (2007): Silence in NGO Discourse: The Role and Future of NGOs in Africa. Nairobi: Fahamu.
• Jens Steffek and Kristina Hahn (2010): Evaluating Transnational NGOs: Legitimacy, Accountability, Representation. New York: Palgrave, Macmillan.
• Yearbook of International Organizations, produced by the Union of International Associations.

External links

• "What is a Non-Governmental Organization?". City University, London.
• "Video speech – Helen Clark, Administrator of the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) on World NGO Day". YouTube.