Left-libertarianism

This article is about the type of libertarianism stressing both individual freedom and social equality. For the socialist anti-authoritarian, anti-statist and libertarian philosophy, see Libertarian socialism.

Left-libertarianism,^[1] also known as left-wing libertarianism,^[2] is a political philosophy and type of libertarianism that stresses both individual freedom and social equality. Left-libertarianism represents several related yet distinct approaches to political and social theory. Its classical usage refers to anti-authoritarian varieties of left-wing politics such as anarchism, especially social anarchism.^[3]

While right-libertarianism is widely seen as synonymous with libertarianism in the United States, left-libertarianism is the predominant form of libertarianism in Europe.^[4] In the United States, left-libertarianism is the term used for the left wing of the libertarian movement,^[3] including the political positions associated with academic philosophers Hillel Steiner, Philippe Van Parijs, and Peter Vallentyne that combine self-ownership with an egalitarian approach to natural resources.^[5] Although libertarianism in the United States has become associated with classical liberalism and minarchism, with right-libertarianism being more known than left-libertarianism,^[6] political usage of the term libertarianism until then was associated exclusively with anti-capitalism, libertarian socialism, and social anarchism; in most parts of the world, such an association still predominates.^[3][7]

Left-libertarians are skeptical of, or fully against, private ownership of natural resources, arguing, in contrast to right-libertarians, that neither claiming nor mixing one's labor with natural resources is enough to generate full private property rights, and they maintain that natural resources should be held in an egalitarian manner, either unowned or owned collectively.^[8] Those left-libertarians who are more lenient towards private property support different property norms and theories, such as usufruct^[9] or under the condition that recompense is offered to the local or even global community.^[10][11]

Like other forms of libertarianism, left-libertarian views on the state range from minarchism, which argues for a decentralised and limited government, to anarchism, which advocates for the state to be abolished entirely.^[12]

Terminology

See also: Definition of anarchism and libertarianism

Libertarianism is a philosophy that advocates for freedom, whether political, economical or metaphysical.^[13] Although older political movements have been identified as libertarian (for example, Marxist historian E.P. Thompson argued in 1979 that "the English left-libertarian tradition can be traced back to the Levellers, Diggers and the Chartists"^[14]), the political definition of the term "libertarian" (from the French: libertaire) was coined by the French anarchist communist Joseph Déjacque in 1857, whereafter libertarianism became synonymous with anarchism.^[15] The term was widely used by anarchists until the 1970s, when libertarianism first started to be associated with a radical free market philosophy, particularly in the United States.^[16][17]

The oldest, traditional, definition of "left-libertarianism" used it synonymously with social anarchism.^[18] Seeking to distinguish themselves from the new generation of free-market libertarians, social anarchists began referring to themselves as "left-libertarians",^[19] while the new adoptees of the term became known as "right-libertarians".^[20] This usage is also applied to libertarian socialists such as William Morris or Fenner Brockway^[21][22] and libertarian Marxists such as Cornelius Castoriadis.^[23]

At the same time as social anarchists began using the term to distinguish themselves from free-market libertarians, some of the advocates of free market economics that were associated with the New Left, including Roy Childs and Samuel Konkin, also began referring to themselves as "left-libertarians" in order to highlight themselves as the left-wing of the new free-market libertarian movement.^[13] As anti-capitalist advocates of free-market economics, they used the term "left-libertarian" in order to distinguish themselves from the right-wing advocates of libertarian capitalism.^[24]

Left libertarianism is defined a little differently by many European political scientists, in a usage introduced by Herbert Kitschelt in 1989.^[25][26] Left libertarian parties emphasise notions of internal party democracy and bottom-up participation.^[27][28] Green parties and radical left parties are often grouped together as "left-libertarian" parties by political scientists.^[29][30][31]

For political scientists Jan Jämte and Adrienne Sörbom,

The term radical left-libertarianism is used as an umbrella concept, gathering different strands of anti-authoritarian forms of socialism, stressing both anti-capitalist and anti-statist views, as well as the need to build a society based on voluntary forms of cooperation. Presently, such movements also often articulate strong criticism of what are seen as other forms of oppression, such as sexism, racism and homophobia, thus making the movements potential allies to a wider section of movement cultures. The anarchist ideology and movement are firmly rooted within this broad ideational category, together with other branches of left-libertarianism such as council communism, anarcho-syndicalism or autonomism.^[32]

The term "radical left-libertarian movements" (RLLMs) is used by many political scientists to refer to anarchists, autonomists and others in the alternative cultures and movements that arose out of the new social movements from the 1960s onwards, such as those involved in squatting and militant anti-fascism.^{[33][34][35][36]} For example, in a comparative study of left libertarianism in Sweden and Poland, Piotrowski and Wennerhag state that

activists from anarchist, autonomist, and anarcho-syndicalist groups, whose political orientations include both libertarian Marxist and anarchist perspectives,… are the principal actors within the radical left-libertarian movement in the countries of our study. All of these groups are based on ideologies that express anti-capitalist, anti-authoritarian/anti-state, anti-racist/antifascist and pro-direct/participatory democracy stances from a radical left-libertarian standpoint (Katsiaficas 1997; Curran 2006; Romanos 2013). Historically, such movement activism can be connected to those ideologies and strategies that emerged within two broader "movement families" (cf. della Porta and Rucht 1995, 230 ff.): namely, the labor movement (in particular during the late 19th and early 20th century) and the "new left" or "new social movements" of the 1960s and onwards. Within these movement families, the groups we analyze here have often been thought to constitute the "radical flank" (cf. Haines 2013).^[37]

According to sociologist Jennifer Carlson, left-libertarianism is one of the three main branches of libertarian political philosophy, alongside right-libertarianism, a capitalist philosophy that defends strong private property rights; and socialist libertarianism, an anti-capitalist philosophy that opposes the concentration of wealth.^[38] By the turn of the 21st century, some analytic philosophers had also adopted the label of "left-libertarianism".^[13] This contemporary model of left-libertarianism, associated mainly with Peter Vallentyne and Hillel Steiner,^[39] distinguishes itself from right-libertarianism in its advocacy of the social ownership and equitable distribution of natural resources, while also upholding the libertarian principle of self-ownership.^[40]

Philosophy

While all libertarians begin with a conception of personal autonomy from which they argue in favor of civil liberties and a reduction or elimination of the state, left-libertarianism encompasses those libertarian beliefs that claim the Earth's natural resources belong to everyone in an egalitarian manner, either unowned or owned collectively.^{[2][3][8][10][11]}

Property rights

Left-libertarians generally uphold self-ownership and oppose strong private property rights, instead supporting the egalitarian distribution of natural resources.^[38] Other left-libertarians believe that neither claiming nor mixing one's labor with natural resources is enough to generate full private property rights^[41][42] and maintain that natural resources ought to be held in an egalitarian manner, either unowned or owned collectively.^[43]

Political scientist Peter Mclaverty notes it has been argued that socialist values are incompatible with the concept of self-ownership when this concept is considered "the core feature of libertarianism" and socialism is defined as holding "that we are social beings, that society should be organised, and individuals should act, so as to promote the common good, that we should strive to achieve social equality and promote democracy, community and solidarity."^[44] However, political philosopher Nicholas Vrousalis has also argued that "property rights [...] do not pass judgment as to what rights individuals have to their own person [...] [and] to the external world" and that "the nineteenth-century egalitarian libertarians were not misguided in thinking that a thoroughly libertarian form of communism is possible at the level of principle."^[45]

Economics

Other left-libertarians make a libertarian reading of progressive and social-democratic economics to advocate a universal basic income. Building on Michael Otsuka's conception of "robust libertarian self-ownership", Karl Widerquist argues that a universal basic income must be large enough to maintain individual independence regardless of the market value of resources because people in contemporary society have been denied direct access to enough resources with which they could otherwise maintain their existence in the absence of interference by people who control access to resources.^[46]

Schools of thought

Social anarchism

Murray Bookchin, a left-libertarian of the social anarchist school

In its oldest form, "left-libertarianism" was used synonymously with social anarchism.^[18] Although social anarchism and other forms of left-libertarianism share similar roots and concerns, social anarchism has distinguished itself as a distinct ideological tradition,^[47] due to its fundamental rejection of the state.^[48] In contrast to individualist tendencies, social anarchism rejects private property and market relations,^[49] which they believe will be eliminated with the abolition of the state.^[50]

Social anarchism, originally associated with the libertarianism of Joseph Déjacque, has historically encompassed collectivist anarchism, anarchist communism and anarcho-syndicalism; each of which became influential tendencies in the Russian and Spanish Revolutions.^[51]

The contemporary left-libertarian Murray Bookchin advocated for the replacement of the state with a libertarian communist society, which he saw as a decentralized confederation of municipalities, in which decisions would be made by direct democracy.^[52] Bookchin was also harshly critical of individualist anarchism, which he held responsible for the failure of left-libertarianism to take a prominent place in public discourse.^[53]

New social movements

In 1960s Germany, the libertarian left was a dominant current in the extra-parliamentary opposition, "Außerparlamentarische Opposition" (ApO).^[54]

The punk scene provoked an expansion of the libertarian left: "a broader 'libertarian left' influence can be discerned in punk and post-punk's engagement with gender relations, sexuality, consumerism, imperialism and so forth".^[55]

Northern Europe saw an upsurge in radical left-libertarian activism, squatting and urban unrest at the turn of the 1980s.^[34] From this point until the late 2010s, "the main tendency in radical left activism shifted from party-based Marxism-Leninism to network-based, direct-action activism based on libertarian socialist ideals… shifting [in this period] from direct-action networks that engaged in a variety of political issue—anti-fascism, anti-imperialism, feminism, animal rights, etc.—to more 'conventional' networks of organizations and initiatives through which activists intervened in local politics and neighborhood and workplace conflicts. The same period also saw the [radical left libertarian movements] become less disruptive and violent, in favor of tactical pragmatism and conventional forms of protest".^[35]

Free-market anti-capitalism

Gary Chartier, a left-libertarian of the free-market anti-capitalist school

Alongside social anarchists, left-wing proponents of free-market economics have associated themselves with left-libertarianism,^[13] also partly influenced by the New Left. This post-classical definition has been used synonymously with the free-market anti-capitalism (a.k.a. left-wing market anarchism) advocated by Kevin Carson, Gary Chartier, and Charles W. Johnson,^[56] who together formed the Alliance of the Libertarian Left and the subsequent Center for a Stateless Society.^[57] Drawing from the views of American individualist anarchists such as Benjamin Tucker and Lysander Spooner, left-wing market anarchists defend the use of free markets and private property, which they consider to have an "essential coordinating role" in society.^[58] Free-market anti-capitalists hold market intervention responsible for capitalist control of the means of production, a situation they believe will be solved by the introduction of free competition. Building on Tucker's ideas, Kevin Carson has also defended the labor theory of value and occupancy-and-use land ownership, although not all free-market anti-capitalists agree with these positions.^[57] Like social anarchists and unlike many right-libertarians, left-wing market anarchists are opposed to capitalism and other forms of oppression such as racism and sexism; they consider this anti-oppression politics to be an integral part of left-libertarianism.^[59]

Green politics and left libertarian parties

Main article: Green politics

The green movement, especially its more left-wing factions, is often described by political scientists as left-libertarian.^[60][61][62]

In the wake of the new social movements (especially the ecology and anti-nuclear movements) of the 1970s and 1980s, many left libertarian parties (sometimes called movement parties) were formed, including green parties, which maintained a relationship with these social movements.^[63][64] Political scientists Santos and Mercea argue that, in recent years, "the rise of movement parties across Europe has disrupted traditional notions of party politics and opened up new avenues for citizen engagement and political mobilisation. Movement parties are the reflection of a wider socio-political transformation of increasing interconnection between electoral and non-electoral politics". For them, green/left-libertarian movement parties "embody a generational gap in political participation, as they utilise both electoral and non-electoral engagement to express their post-industrial demands... [Their] voters tend to be younger and more educated and engage more in online political activities."^[65]

According to Herbert Kitschelt, left libertarian parties are "post-materialist" in that they reject the primary status of economic issues, and argue that "the predominance of markets and bureaucracies must be rolled back in favor of social solidarity relations and participatory institutions".^[66] He posits that the strong commitment to direct participation leads to the weakness (or even absence) of formal structurel, centralized organization, leadership and hierarchy, and "a sometimes chaotic ‘assembly’ organizational style (as best illustrated by the water-balloon attack on Foreign Minister Joshka Fischer at the 1999 congress of the German Greens)."^[67]

For example, between 1984 and 1986, ecologists worked together with anarchists and libertarians in Greece's Green Alternative Movement.^[68] while the Dutch GroenLinks moved from socialism to left libertarianism in the early 1990s.^[69] Political scientists see European political parties such as Ecolo and Groen in Belgium, Alliance 90/The Greens in Germany, or the Green Progressive Accord and GroenLinks in the Netherlands as coming out of the New Left and emphasizing spontaneous self-organisation, participatory democracy, decentralization and voluntarism, being contrasted to the bureaucratic or statist approach.^[62] Similarly, political scientist Ariadne Vromen has described the Australian Greens as having a "clear left-libertarian ideological base."^[70] Examples of left libertarian parties given by Kitschelt and Hellemans in 1990 were Agalev and Ecolo;^[71] Kittschelt's term was applied to the Green Party of England and Wales in 2008;^[72] examples given by Santos and Mercea more recently are Denmark's Alternativet, Germany's Bündis 90/Die Grünen, in Hungary LMP – Hungary's Green Party and Dialogue – The Greens' Party, and the UK's Green Party, Scottish Greens and Sinn Fein.^[65]

Such parties attempt to apply left-libertarian ideas to a more pragmatic system of democratic governance as opposed to contemporary individualist or socialist libertarianism.^[73] Typically, there is a tension between the left-libertarian inheritance and demands of pragmatism. For example, Margit Mayer and John Ely describe the German Greens as "remain[ing] connected to the left-libertarian movement milieus in the topics it addresses, its political style, and the omnipresence of movement discourse" while also pursuing practical strategies for party power.^[74]

A new wave of left libertarian movement parties emerged from the alterglobalisation and anti-austerity movements from the late 1990s. In Portugal, the Left Bloc emerged in the late 1990s from the anti-austerity movement, and is inspired by the libertarian left.^[75] Greece’s Synaspismos and its successor Syriza came from a similar background. ^[76] In Turkey, Ufuk Uras of the Party of the Greens and the Left Future identifies as a left-libertarian.Ufuk Uras identifies as a left libertarian. In 2015 he said: ^[77]

Contemporary left-libertarian philosophy

In contrast to right-libertarianism and libertarian socialism, left-libertarianism holds that individuals should have no exclusive right to the exploitation of natural resources, instead advocating for an equitable distribution of resources, while also insisting on the protection of personal property rights.^[78] Contemporary left-libertarian scholars such as David Ellerman,^[79][80] Michael Otsuka,^[81] Hillel Steiner,^[82] Peter Vallentyne^[83] and Philippe Van Parijs^[84] root an economic egalitarianism in the classical liberal concepts of self-ownership and land appropriation, combined with geoist or physiocratic views regarding the ownership of land and natural resources (e.g. those of Henry George and John Locke).^[85][43][86] Their intellectual forebears include Henry George, Thomas Paine, and Herbert Spencer.^[87][88] Classical economists such as Henry George, John Stuart Mill, the early writings of Herbert Spencer,^[89] among others, "provided the basis for the further development of the left libertarian perspective."^[90] Most left-libertarians of this tradition support some form of economic rent redistribution on the grounds that each individual is entitled to an equal share of natural resources^[91] and argue for the desirability of state social welfare programs.^[92][93]

Scholars representing this school of left-libertarianism often understand their position in contrast to right-libertarians, who maintain that there are no fair share constraints on use or appropriation that individuals have the power to appropriate unowned things by claiming them (usually by mixing their labor with them) and deny any other conditions or considerations are relevant and that there is no justification for the state to redistribute resources to the needy or to overcome market failures. A number of left-libertarians of this school argue for the desirability of some state social welfare programs.^[94][93] Left-libertarians of the Carson–Long left-libertarianism school typically endorse the labor-based property rights that contemporary left-libertarians reject, but they hold that implementing such rights would have radical rather than conservative consequences.^[95]

Left-libertarians of this school hold that it is illegitimate for anyone to claim private ownership of natural resources to the detriment of others.^[87] These left-libertarians support some form of income redistribution on the grounds of a claim by each individual to be entitled to an equal share of natural resources.^[96][91] Unappropriated natural resources are either unowned or owned in common and private appropriation is only legitimate if everyone can appropriate an equal amount or if private appropriation is taxed to compensate those who are excluded from natural resources.^[91]

See also

• Cellular democracy
• Civil libertarianism
• Cultural liberalism
• Cultural radicalism
• Drug liberalization
• Grassroots democracy
• Individualist feminism
• Left-libertarians (category)
• Libertarian Democrat
• Libertarian municipalism
• Libertarian paternalism
• Libertarian transhumanism
• Lockean proviso
• Market socialism
• Neoclassical liberalism
• Outline of libertarianism
• Radical movement
• Refusal of work

References

1. Carlson 2012, p. 1006; Goodway 2006, p. 4; Marshall 2008, p. 641.
2. Spitz, Jean-Fabien (March 2006). "Left-wing libertarianism: equality based on self-ownership". Raisons Politiques. 23 (3). Archived from the original on 23 March 2019. Retrieved 28 November 2019.
3. Long 2012, p. 227.
4. Carlson 2012, pp. 1006–1007.
5. Long 2012, p. 227; Kymlicka 2005, p. 516.
6. Carlson 2012, p. 1009.
7. Bookchin, Murray; Biehl, Janet (1997). The Murray Bookchin Reader. London: Cassell. p. 170. ISBN 0-304-33873-7.
8. Carlson, Jennifer D. (2012). "Libertarianism". In Miller, Wilbur R. The social history of crime and punishment in America. London: Sage Publications. p. 1007. ISBN 1-4129-8876-4. "Left-libertarians disagree with right-libertarians with respect to property rights, arguing instead that individuals have no inherent right to natural resources. Namely, these resources must be treated as collective property that is made available on an egalitarian basis".
9. Carson, Kevin. "An Introduction to Left-Libertarianism". Center for a Stateless Society. Archived from the original on 2019-09-03. Retrieved 2023-01-01.
10. Vallentyne, Peter (March 2009). "Libertarianism". In Zalta, Edward N. (ed.). Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2009 ed.). Stanford, CA: Stanford University. Archived from the original on 6 July 2019. Retrieved 5 March 2010. Libertarianism is committed to full self-ownership. A distinction can be made, however, between right-libertarianism and left-libertarianism, depending on the stance taken on how natural resources can be owned.
11. Narveson, Jan; Trenchard, David (2008). "Left Libertarianism". In Hamowy, Ronald (ed.). The Encyclopedia of Libertarianism. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; Cato Institute. pp. 288–289. doi:10.4135/9781412965811.n174. ISBN 978-1-4129-6580-4. LCCN 2008009151. OCLC 750831024. Archived from the original on 2023-01-09. Retrieved 2016-03-18. Left libertarians regard each of us as full self-owners. However, they differ from what we generally understand by the term libertarian in denying the right to private property. We own ourselves, but we do not own nature, at least not as individuals. Left libertarians embrace the view that all natural resources, land, oil, gold, and so on should be held collectively. To the extent that individuals make use of these commonly owned goods, they must do so only with the permission of society, a permission granted only under the proviso that a certain payment for their use be made to society at large.
12. Carlson 2012, p. 1006; Marshall 2008, pp. 641–642.
13. Long 2021, p. 30.
14. Stevenson, Nick. "Orwell as Public Intellectual: Anarchism, Communism and the New Left". Anarchist Studies. 29 (1). Lawrence Wishart: 19–38. Retrieved 13 September 2024.
15. Long 2021, p. 30; Marshall 2008, p. 641.
16. Long 2021, p. 30; Marshall 2008, pp. 641–642.
17. Berman, Paul (25 September 1996). "The Last of the Anarchists". Slate Magazine. Retrieved 12 September 2024. The word "libertarian" began as a left-wing synonym for "anarchist," and was taken over by the right-wing free-marketers of the Libertarian Party only in recent decades.
18. Goodway 2006, pp. 1–4; Long 2012, p. 227.
19. Goodway 2006, p. 4; Long 2017, p. 308n104; Long 2021, p. 30.
20. Goodway 2006, p. 4; Long 2021, p. 30.
21. George Woodcock (23 October 2016). "The crystal spirit: A study of George Orwell". Internet Archive. Retrieved 11 September 2024. [George] Orwell appeared on the platform with Herbert Read, Fenner Brockway and a few other leaders of the libertarian Left.[p.18]... Julian Symons was substantially correct when he said, in his London Magazine article, that Orwell retained his faith in libertarian socialism until his death, but that in the end this belief "was expressed for him more sympathetically in the personalities of unpractical Anarchists than in the slide rule Socialists who made up the bulk of the British Parliamentary Labor Party.[p.27]... Orwell's affinities were in fact less with Lawrence and Yeats than with William Morris, another libertarian Socialist who distrusted doctrinaires [p.83]
22. Historians Evan Smith and Matthew Worley describe "left libertarianism" as discussed by David Goodway as "the space between anarchism and socialist humanism."Smith, Evan; Worley, Matthew (2014). "Introduction: The far left in Britain from 1956". Against the grain: The British far left from 1956. Manchester University Press. p. 1–22. ISBN 978-0-7190-9590-0. JSTOR j.ctt18mvmsj.6. Retrieved 12 September 2024.
23. Benoît Challand, "Socialisme ou Barbarie or the Partial Encounters Between Anarchism and Critical Marxism", in: Alex Prichard, Ruth Kinna, Dave Berry, Saku Pinta (eds.), Libertarian Socialism: Politics in Black and Red, Palgrave Macmillan, 2012, pp. 210–231, esp. 210, "... Castoriadis's evident legacy to Left-libertarian thinking and his radical break with orthodox Marxist-Leninism ..."
24. Long 2017, p. 308n104.
25. Kitschelt, Herbert (1989) The Logics of Party Formation. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
26. Gunther, Richard; Diamond, Larry (2003). "Species of Political Parties: A New Typology". Party Politics. 9 (2): 167–199. doi:10.1177/13540688030092003. ISSN 1354-0688. Herbert Kitschelt (1989) differentiates parties that emphasize the 'logic of electoral competition' from those (such as the 'left-libertarian' type that he introduces) that place much greater stress on the 'logic of constituency representation'...
27. Kitschelt, H. (1988) 'Left-libertarian parties: explaining innovation in competitive party systems', World Politics, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 194 –234.
28. Tsakatika, Myrto; Eleftheriou, Costas (2013). "The Radical Left's Turn towards Civil Society in Greece: One Strategy, Two Paths". South European Society and Politics. 18: 81–99. doi:10.1080/13608746.2012.757455.
29. Lourenço, Pedro (2021). "Studying European Radical Left Parties since the Fall of the Berlin Wall (1990–2019): A Scoping Review". Swiss Political Science Review. 27 (4): 754–777. doi:10.1111/spsr.12478. ISSN 1424-7755.
30. March, L., & Mudde, C. (2005). What's left of the radical left? The European radical left after 1989: Decline and mutation. Comparative European Politics, 3(1), 23–49.
31. Redding, K., & Viterna, J. S. (1999). Political demands, political opportunities: Explaining the differential success of left-libertarian parties. Social Forces, 78(2), 491–510.
32. Jan Jämte and Adrienne Sörbom, Why Did It Not Happen Here? The Gradual Radicalization of the Anarchist Movement in Sweden 1980–90, in: A European Youth Revolt European Perspectives on Youth Protest and Social Movements in the 1980s, Palgrave, 2016, p.98
33. "Anarchists in Eastern and Western Europe". Södertörns högskola. Retrieved 20 August 2024.
34. Jan Jämte and Adrienne Sörbom, Why Did It Not Happen Here? The Gradual Radicalization of the Anarchist Movement in Sweden 1980–90, p.97
35. Jämte, Jan; Lundstedt, Måns; Wennerhag, Magnus (2023). "Radical Left Movements in Scandinavia, 1980–2020: Straddling Militant Counterculture and Popular Movements". The Palgrave Handbook of Left-Wing Extremism, Volume 1. Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp. 281–304. doi:10.1007/978-3-031-30897-0_16. ISBN 978-3-031-30896-3.
36. Polanska, Dominika V.; Piotrowski, Grzegorz (3 November 2016). "Poland: Local differences and the importence of cohesion". Baltic Worlds. IX (1–2): 46–56. Retrieved 20 August 2024.
37. Piotrowski, Grzegorz; Wennerhag, Magnus (2015), "Always against the state? An analysis of Polish and Swedish radical left-libertarian activists' interaction with institutionalized politics", Partecipazione e Conflitto, 8 (3), University of Salento: 845–875, doi:10.1285/I20356609V8I3P845
38. Carlson 2012, p. 1006.
39. Kymlicka 2005, pp. 516–517; Long 2012, p. 227.
40. Kymlicka 2005, p. 516; Long 2012, p. 227; Long 2021, p. 30.
41. Carlson (2012). p. 1007. "[Left-libertarians] disagree with right-libertarians with respect to property rights, arguing instead that individuals have no inherent right to natural resources. Namely, these resources must be treated as collective property that is made available on an egalitarian basis."
42. Narveson, Jan; Trenchard, David (2008). "Left Libertarianism". In Hamowy, Ronald (ed.). The Encyclopedia of Libertarianism. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; Cato Institute. pp. 288–289. doi:10.4135/9781412965811.n174. ISBN 978-1-4129-6580-4. LCCN 2008009151. OCLC 750831024. Archived from the original on 2023-01-09. Retrieved 2016-03-18. [Left libertarians] regard each of us as full self-owners. Left libertarians embrace the view that all natural resources, land, oil, gold, trees, and so on should be held collectively. To the extent that individuals make use of these commonly owned goods, they must do so only with the permission of society, a permission granted only under the provision that a certain payment for their use be made to society at large.
43. Vallentyne, Peter (2014). "Libertarianism". In Zalta, Edward N. (ed.). The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2014 ed.). Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. Archived from the original on 2024-02-08. Retrieved 2023-01-01.
44. Mclaverty, Peter (2005). "Socialism and libertarianism". Journal of Political Ideologies. 10 (2): 185–198. doi:10.1080/13569310500097349. S2CID 144693867.
45. Vrousalis, Nicholas (April 2011). "Libertarian Socialism: A Better Reconciliation between Self-Ownership and Equality". Social Theory and Practice. 37 (2): 221–226. doi:10.5840/soctheorpract201137213. JSTOR 23558541. SSRN 1703457.
46. Widerquist, Karl (2013). "What Good Is a Theory of Freedom That Allows Forced Labor? Independence and Modern Theory of Freedom". Independence, Propertylessness, and Basic Income: A Theory of Freedom as the Power to Say No Updating. New York City: Springer. pp. 121–143. ISBN 978-1-137-31309-6.
47. Marshall 2008, p. 642.
48. Bookchin 1995, p. 60; Marshall 2008, p. 642.
49. Long 2012, p. 219; Marshall 2008, pp. 498–499.
50. Long 2012, p. 219.
51. Long 2012, pp. 223–224.
52. Bookchin 1995, p. 60.
53. Bookchin 1995, pp. 51–59.
54. Confesson, Alan (8 February 2019). Une nouvelle gauche radicale : analyse comparative des transformations de la famille partisane de la gauche radicale européenne au XXIème siècle: (2000-2017) (Thesis). Université Grenoble Alpes. Retrieved 22 August 2024.
55. Matthew Worley, Riotous Assembly: British Punk's Cultural Diaspora in the Summer of '81, in: A European Youth Revolt European Perspectives on Youth Protest and Social Movements in the 1980s, Palgrave, 2016, p.224-25
56. Long 2012, p. 227; Long 2017, p. 308; Long 2021, pp. 31–32.
57. Long 2017, p. 308.
58. Long 2021, pp. 31–32.
59. Long 2021, p. 32.
60. Kitschelt, Herbert (1988). "The Life Expectancy of Left-Libertarian Parties. Does Structural Transformation or Economic Decline Explain Party Innovation? A Response to Wilhelm P. Bürklin". European Sociological Review. 4 (2): 155–160. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.esr.a036474. ISSN 0266-7215. JSTOR 522545.
61. Redding, Kent; Viterna, Jocelyn S. (1999). "Political Demands, Political Opportunities: Explaining the Differential Success of Left-Libertarian Parties". Social Forces. 78 (2): 491–510. doi:10.2307/3005565. ISSN 0037-7732. JSTOR 3005565.
62. Neumayer, Eric (June 2003). "Are left-wing party strength and corporatism good for the environment? Evidence from panel analysis of air pollution in OECD countries". Ecological Economics. 45 (2): 203–220. Bibcode:2003EcoEc..45..203N. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(03)00012-0. ISSN 0921-8009. Archived from the original on 2019-05-11. Retrieved 2019-11-29.
63. Porta, Donatella della; Fernández, Joseba; Kouki, Hara; Mosca, Lorenzo (2017-05-01). Movement Parties Against Austerity. Cambridge Malden (Mass.): Polity. p. 21. ISBN 978-1-5095-1145-7.
64. Kim, Seongcheol (15 August 2023). "Movement parties of the left, right, and center: A discursive-organizational approach". Constellations. doi:10.1111/1467-8675.12705. ISSN 1351-0487. an earlier wave of interest in movement–party interactions that emerged in the late 1980s and 1990s in relation to newly emerging Green and "left-libertarian" political parties in the wake of anti-nuclear and environmental protest movements (Kitschelt, 1989; Kitschelt & Hellemans, 1990; Mayer & Ely, 1998; Richardson & Rootes, 1994).
65. Santos, Felipe G.; Mercea, Dan (20 January 2024). "Young democrats, critical citizens and protest voters: studying the profiles of movement party supporters". Acta Politica. doi:10.1057/s41269-023-00321-7. ISSN 0001-6810.
66. Kitschelt, 1989:64, cited by Gunther and Diamond 2003:188
67. Kitschelt, 1989:66, cited by Gunther and Diamond 2003:189
68. Gregor Kritidis, The Rise and Crisis of the Anarchist and Libertarian Movement in Greece, 1973–2012, in: The City Is Ours: Squatting and Autonomous Movements in Europe from the 1970s to the Present, 2014, p.75
69. March, Luke (2013). Radical Left Parties in Europe. London: Routledge Studies in Extremism. p. 159. ISBN 978-0-415-84323-2.
70. Vromen, Ariadne (2005). "Who are the Australian Greens? Surveying the membership". Ethnographic Praxis in Industry. Retrieved 15 July 2020.
71. Kitschelt, Herbert; Hellemans, Staf (1990). "The Left-Right Semantics and the New Politics Cleavage". Comparative Political Studies. 23 (2): 210–238. doi:10.1177/0010414090023002003. ISSN 0010-4140. The general distribution of opinions on the issues fully justifies calling Agalev and Ecolo left-libertarian parties, the attributes we used at the beginning of this article to characterize the entire cohort of new politics parties. In many ways, ecology party activists constitute a "second left (Sainteny, 1987, p. 28), which blends anticapitalist with ecological, postmaterialist, and libertarian demands. The marketplace should not be the central institution of economic governance, yet militants are more inclined to support decentralized, communitarian institutions with direct democratic participation than to support traditional statist and collectivist socialism. Moreover, they put less emphasis on redistributive concerns that have figured so prominently on the conventional socialist policy agenda. Anticapitalism shows that ideological components of traditional left thinking are still alive in left-libertarian politics... At the same time, however, they are combined with noneconomic themes that are hard to reconcile with socialist leftism.
72. Carter, Neil (2008). "The Green Party: Emerging from the Political Wilderness?". British Politics. 3 (2): 223–240. doi:10.1057/bp.2008.5. ISSN 1746-918X.
73. Sharlamanov, Kire (2023). "Environment Protection in a Left-Libertarian Political Philosophy". The Left Libertarianism of the Greens. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland. pp. 33–63. doi:10.1007/978-3-031-39263-4_2. ISBN 978-3-031-39262-7.
74. Mayer, Margit; Ely, John (1998). The German Greens. Philadelphia: Temple University Press. p. 7. ISBN 978-1-56639-515-1.
75. Confesson, Alan (8 February 2019). Une nouvelle gauche radicale : analyse comparative des transformations de la famille partisane de la gauche radicale européenne au XXIème siècle : (2000-2017) (Thesis). Université Grenoble Alpes. Retrieved 22 August 2024. Although heavily dependent on its leaders to ensure its progress at the polls, the Portuguese Left Bloc has retained an internal organisation that is fairly faithful to the left-libertarian party model, with in particular "participative" mechanisms granting relatively significant powers to members, and significant internal division… Although the role of the charismatic leader was decisive in the rise of the BE, first with Francisco Louçã and then with Catarina Martins, the internal mode of operation of the party, largely inspired by the traditions of the libertarian left, saw few changes between 1999 and 2017.
76. Confesson, Alan (8 February 2019). Une nouvelle gauche radicale : analyse comparative des transformations de la famille partisane de la gauche radicale européenne au XXIème siècle : (2000-2017) (Thesis). Université Grenoble Alpes. Retrieved 22 August 2024. Syriza is an excellent example, which could eventually become a textbook case in the scientific literature: originally a coalition of several parties, close to the model of the left-libertarian party, with few hierarchical structures, decentralized decision-making processes, imprecise statutes, a refusal of professionalization and exacerbated factionalism, Syriza evolved in record time into a highly centralized organization which ended up merging with its leader, Alexis Tsipras… The observations, however, also apply to Synaspismos before the creation of Syriza, a party which, from an organizational point of view, corresponds almost in all respects to the model of the left-libertarian party, and has in some way imported this culture into Syriza.
77. "Turkish libertarian: Pro-Kurdish HDP in Turkey should be like Syriza in Greece". rudaw.net. 1 January 1970. Retrieved 9 September 2024. The libertarian left is different from the traditional left because of its principles. These are: going in and out of power through elections, respect for different identities and beliefs, socially libertarian, egalitarian, eco-minded, participatory and for the restoration of justice. We would like the HDP to have such a profile. What we are trying to do is to adopt the Syriza experience in Greece to the HDP in Turkey.
78. Carlson 2012, p. 1007.
79. Ellerman, David (1992). Property and Contract in Economics: The Case for Economic Democracy. Cambridge MA: Blackwell.
80. Ellerman, David (1990). The Democratic Worker-Owned Firm. London: Unwin Hyman.
81. • Otsuka, Michael (2005). Libertarianism Without Inequality. New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-928018-6.
82. Steiner, Hillel (1994). An Essay on Rights. Oxford: Blackwell.
83. (2000). Left Libertarianism and Its Critics: The Contemporary Debate. In Vallentyne, Peter; and Steiner, Hillel. London:Palgrave.
84. Van Parijs, Philippe (2009). Marxism Recycled. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
85. Vallentyne, Peter (2007). "Libertarianism and the State". Liberalism: Old and New. In Paul, Ellen Frankel; Miller Jr., Fred; Paul, Jeffrey. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. p. 199.
86. Casal, Paula (2011). "Global Taxes on Natural Resources" (PDF). Journal of Moral Philosophy. 8 (3): 307–327. doi:10.1163/174552411x591339. Archived (PDF) from the original on 14 March 2014. Retrieved 14 March 2014. It can also invoke geoism, a philosophical tradition encompassing the views of John Locke and Henry George [...].
87. Kymlicka 2005, p. 516.
88. Fried 2004, p. 66.
89. Fried 2020, p. 176.
90. Ryley, Peter (2013). Making Another World Possible: Anarchism, Anti-capitalism and Ecology in Late 19th and Early 20th Century Britain. Bloomsbury Publishing. p. 5. ISBN 978-1-4411-5377-7.
91. Mack, Eric; Gaus, Gerald F. (2004). "Classical Liberalism and Libertarianism: The Liberty Tradition". In Gaus, Gerald F.; Kukathas, Chandran (eds.). Handbook of Political Theory. Sage. p. 128. ISBN 978-0-7619-6787-3. Archived from the original on 2024-02-08. Retrieved 2023-01-29.
92. Van Parijs, Phillippe (1998). Real Freedom for All: What (If Anything) Can Justify Capitalism? Oxford: Clarendon-Oxford University Press.
93. Daskal, Steve (1 January 2010). "Libertarianism Left and Right, the Lockean Proviso, and the Reformed Welfare State". Social Theory and Practice. p. 1. Archived 16 May 2011 at the Wayback Machine.
94. Van Parijs, Phillippe (1998). Real Freedom for All: What (If Anything) Can Justify Capitalism? Oxford:Clarendon-Oxford University Press.
95. Vallentyne, Peter; Steiner, Hillel (2000). The Origins of Left-Libertarianism. Basingstoke: Palgrave. ISBN 978-0-312-23591-8.
96. Vallentyne, Peter; Steiner, Hillel (2000). Left-Libertarianism and Its Critics. Basingstoke: Palgrave. p. 1. ISBN 978-0-312-23699-1. OCLC 1057919438.

Bibliography

• Bookchin, Murray (1995). Social Anarchism or Lifestyle Anarchism: The Unbridgeable Chasm. AK Press. pp. 49–61. ISBN 1-873176-83-X.
• Carlson, Jennifer D. (2012). "Libertarianism". In Miller, Wilbur R. (ed.). The Social History of Crime and Punishment in America: An Encyclopedia. Sage Publications. p. 1005-1009. ISBN 978-1-4129-8876-6.
• Fried, Barbara H. (Winter 2004). "Left-Libertarianism: A Review Essay". Philosophy & Public Affairs. 32 (1): 66–92. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2004.00005.x. ISSN 0048-3915. JSTOR 3557982.
• Fried, Barbara H. (2020). "Left-Libertarianism". Facing Up to Scarcity: The Logic and Limits of Nonconsequentialist Thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 176–196. ISBN 978-0-19-884787-8.
• Goodway, David (2006). Anarchist Seeds Beneath the Snow: Left-libertarian Thought and British Writers from William Morris to Colin Ward. Liverpool University Press. ISBN 978-1-84631-025-6.
• Long, Roderick T. (2012). "Anarchism". In Gaus, Gerald F.; D'Agostino, Fred (eds.). The Routledge Companion to Social and Political Philosophy. Taylor & Francis Group. pp. 217–230. ISBN 978-0-415-87456-4.
• Long, Roderick T. (2017). "Anarchism and Libertarianism". In Jun, Nathan (ed.). Brill's Companion to Anarchism and Philosophy. Leiden: Brill. pp. 285–317. doi:10.1163/9789004356894_012. ISBN 978-90-04-35689-4.
• Long, Roderick T. (2021). "The Anarchist Landscape". In Chartier, Gary; Van Schoelandt, Chad (eds.). The Routledge Handbook of Anarchy and Anarchist Thought. Routledge. pp. 28–38. doi:10.4324/9781315185255-2. ISBN 978-1-315-18525-5.
• Kymlicka, Will (2005) [1995]. "libertarianism, left-". In Honderich, Ted (ed.). The Oxford Companion to Philosophy (2nd ed.). New York City: Oxford University Press. pp. 516–617. ISBN 0-19-926479-1.
• Marshall, Peter H. (2008) [1992]. Demanding the Impossible: A History of Anarchism. London: Harper Perennial. ISBN 978-0-00-686245-1. OCLC 218212571.
• Vallentyne, Peter (2012). "Left-Libertarianism". The Oxford Handbook of Political Philosophy: 152–168. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195376692.013.0008.

Further reading

• Deshpande, Meena; Vinod, M. J. (2000). Contemporary Political Theory. "Left-libertarianism". PHI Learning Pvt. Ltd. p. 243. ISBN 978-81-203-4713-7.
• Kerr, Gavin (2017). "Geo-Libertarianism: The Prioritization of Unorthodox Market Freedom". The Property-Owning Democracy: Freedom and Capitalism in the Twenty-First Century. Taylor & Francis. pp. 94–141. ISBN 978-1-4411-5377-7.
• Vallentyne, Peter; Steiner, Hillel; Otsuka, Michael (2005). "Why Left-Libertarianism is not Incoherent, Indeterminate, or Irrelevant" (PDF). Philosophy & Public Affairs. 33 (2): 201–215. doi:10.1111/j.1088-4963.2005.00030.x. Archived from the original (PDF) on 11 September 2008.
• Vallentyne, Peter (2000). "Left-Libertarianism: A Primer" (full text; final draft). In Vallentyne, Peter; Steiner, Hillel (eds.). Left Libertarianism and Its Critics: The Contemporary Debate. Palgrave Publishers Ltd. pp. 1–20.

External links

• Media related to Left-libertarianism at Wikimedia Commons
• Quotations related to Left-libertarianism at Wikiquote