Kxʼa languages

The Kxʼa (/ˈkɑː/ KAH) languages, also called Ju–ǂHoan (/ˌdʒuːˈhoʊæn/ joo-HOH-an), is a language family established in 2010 linking the ǂʼAmkoe (ǂHoan) language with the ǃKung (Juu) dialect cluster, a relationship that had been suspected for a decade.^[1] Along with the Tuu languages and Khoe languages, they are one of three language families indigenous to southern Africa, which are typologically similar due to areal effects.

Kxʼa
Ju–ǂHoan
Geographic distribution	Angola, Namibia, and Botswana
Linguistic classification	One of the world's primary language families (Khoisan is a term of convenience)
Subdivisions	ǃKung (Juu) ǂʼAmkoe (ǂHoan)
Language codes
Glottolog	kxaa1236
Kx'a Languages in Orange

Languages

• ǂʼAmkoe (moribund)
• ǃKung (also ǃXun or Ju, formerly Northern Khoisan; a dialect cluster)

ǂʼAmkoe had previously been lumped in with the Tuu languages, perhaps over confusion with the dialect name ǂHȍȁn, but the only thing they have in common are typological features such as their bilabial clicks.

Honken & Heine (2010) coined the term Kxʼa for the family as a replacement for the rather inaccessible compound Ju–ǂHoan (easily confused with the Juǀʼhoan language), after the word [kxʼà] 'earth, ground', which is shared by the two branches of the family, though also by neighboring languages such as Kwadi.

Reconstruction

Honken & Heine (2010) reconstruct six places of click articulation for Proto-Kxʼa: the five coronal places that occur in Central ǃKung, plus the bilabial clicks of ǂʼAmkoe. They postulate that the ancestral bilabial clicks became dental in ǃKung. However, Starostin (2003)^[2] argues that the bilabial clicks are a secondary development in ǂʼAmkoe. He cites the ǂʼAmkoe words for 'one' and 'two', /ŋ͡ʘũ/ and /ʘoa/, where no other Khoisan language has a labial consonant of any kind in its words for these numerals. Sands (2014) notes that ǂʼAmkoe bilabial clicks correspond to all clicks places in ǃKung except for palatal. She postulates that these reflect labialized clicks in Proto-Kxʼa: *ǀʷ *ǃʷ *‼ʷ *ǁʷ. These became bilabial in ǂʼAmkoe, while the only traces of the labialization in ǃKung are diphthongs. An example, from Proto-Kxʼa *‼ʷ, is 'tail' in ǂHoan /ʘχúì/, Juǀʼhoan /ǃxúi/ and Ekoka /ǁxóe/ (from Proto-Ju *‼xoe: retroflex clicks merged with alveolars in Southern ǃKung, with laterals in Northern ǃKung, and only remained retroflex in Central ǃKung.) The lack of **ǂʷ is not surprising, given the relative rarity of labiovelarized palatals crosslinguistically.^[3]

References

1. Honken, Henry; Heine, Bernd (2010). "The Kxʼa Family: A New Khoisan Genealogy" (PDF). Journal of Asian and African Studies. 79. Tokyo: 5–36. doi:10.15026/57434. hdl:10108/57434. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2 November 2018.
2. Starostin, George (2003). "A lexicostatistical approach towards reconstructing Proto-Khoisan" (PDF). Mother Tongue. VIII: 22. ISSN 1087-0326.
3. Sands, Bonny (30 May 2014). Adoption, maintenance and loss of click contrasts (PDF). Sound Change in Interacting Human Systems 3rd Biennial Workshop on Sound Change. University of California, Berkeley.{{cite conference}}: CS1 maint: date and year (link)