Diet in Hinduism

Diet in Hinduism signifies the diverse traditions found across the Indian subcontinent. Hindu scriptures promote a vegetarian dietary ideal based on the concept of ahimsa—non-violence and compassion towards all beings.^[1] According to a Pew Research Center survey, 44% of Hindus say they are vegetarian.^[2]

A lacto-vegetarian thali from Indian state of Maharashtra

History

By mid-1st millennium BCE, all three major Indian religions – Hinduism, Jainism and Buddhism – were championing non-violence as an ethical value, and something that affected one's rebirth. By about 200 CE, food and feasting on animal slaughter were widely considered as a form of violence against life forms, and became a religious and social taboo.^[3][4]

Ralph Fitch, a merchant from London and one of the earliest English travellers to India wrote a letter home in 1580 stating:

"They have a very strange order among them ... They eat no flesh, but live by roots and rice and milk."^[5]

Diet in Hindu scriptures and texts

Vegetarianism in ancient India
In that country they do not keep pigs and fowls, and do not sell live cattle; in the markets there are no butchers' shops and no dealers in intoxicating drink.

— Faxian, Chinese pilgrim to India (4th/5th century CE)^[6]

The Vedas

Evidence from the Vedas suggests the diet of the Vedic people consisted of cereals, initially barley but later dominated by rice, pulses such as māsha (urad), mudga (moong), and masūra (masoor), vegetables such as lotus roots, lotus stem, bottle gourd and milk products, mainly of cows, but also of buffaloes and goats.^[7] The Vedas describe animals including bulls, horses, rams and goats being sacrificed and eaten.^[8] Although cows held an elevated position in the Vedas,^[9] barren cows were also sacrificed. Even then, the word aghnyā ('not to be eaten', 'inviolable') is used for cows multiple times, with some Rigvedic composers considering the whole bovine species, both cows and bulls, inviolable.^[8]

Steven J. Rosen suggests that flesh might only have been eaten as part of ritual sacrifices and not otherwise.^[10] Acts of animal sacrifice were not fully accepted as there were signs of unease and tension owing to the 'gory brutality of sacrificial butchery' dating back to as early as the older Vedas.^[11] The earliest reference to the idea of ahimsa or non-violence to animals (pashu-ahimsa) in any literature, apparently in a moral sense, is found in the Kapisthala Katha Samhita of the Yajurveda (KapS 31.11), written about the 8th century BCE.^[12] The Shatapatha Brahmana contains one of the earliest statements against eating flesh, and the Chāndogya Upaniṣad, has an injunction against killing 'all living entities'. Injunctions against flesh-eating also appear in the Dharmasutras.^[13]

Dharmaśāstras

According to Kane, one who is about to eat food should greet the food when it is served to him, should honour it, never speak ill, and never find fault in it.^[14][15]

The Dharmasastra literature, states Patrick Olivelle, admonishes "people not to cook for themselves alone", offer it to the gods, to forefathers, to fellow human beings as hospitality and as alms to the monks and needy.^[14] Olivelle claims all living beings are interdependent in matters of food and thus food must be respected, worshipped and taken with care.^[14] Olivelle states that the Shastras recommend that when a person sees food, he should fold his hands, bow to it, and say a prayer of thanks.^[14]

The reverence for food reaches a state of extreme in the renouncer or monk traditions in Hinduism.^[14] The Hindu tradition views procurement and preparation of food as necessarily a violent process, where other life forms and nature are disturbed, in part destroyed, changed and reformulated into something edible and palatable. The mendicants (sannyasin, ascetics) avoid being the initiator of this process, and therefore depend entirely on begging for food that is left over of householders.^[14] In pursuit of their spiritual beliefs, states Olivelle, the "mendicants eat other people's left overs".^[14] If they cannot find left overs, they seek fallen fruit or seeds left in field after harvest.^[14]

The forest hermits of Hinduism, on the other hand, do not beg for left overs.^[14] Their food is wild and uncultivated. Their diet would consist mainly of fruits, roots, leaves, and anything that grows naturally in the forest.^[14] They avoided stepping on plowed land, lest they hurt a seedling. They attempted to live a life that minimizes, preferably eliminates, the possibility of harm to any life form.^[14]

Manusmriti

One can never obtain meat without causing injury to living beings... he should, therefore, abstain from meat. Reflecting on how meat is obtained and on how embodied creatures are tied up and killed, he should quit eating any kind of meat... The man who authorises, the man who butchers, the man who slaughters, the man who buys or sells, the man who cooks, the man who serves, and the man who eats – these are all killers. There is no greater sinner than a man who, outside of an offering to gods or ancestors, wants to make his own flesh thrive at the expense of someone else's.

— Manusmriti, 5.48-5.52, translated by Patrick Olivelle^[16]

Manusmriti's discussion on flesh-eating contains 25 verses condemning the consumption of flesh, bracketed by 3 verses defending the practice in the context of Vedic sacrifices.^[17] Commentators starting with Medhātithi interpret the verses to mean that flesh-eating is prohibited generally, and only permitted in the presence of mitigating circumstances, such as danger to life.^[18]

Mahabharata

The Mahabharata contains numerous stories glorifying non-violence towards animals and has some of the strongest statements against slaughter of animals—three chapters of the epic are dedicated to the evils of flesh-eating. Bhishma declares compassion to be the highest religious principle, and compares eating of animal flesh to eating the flesh of one's son. Nominally acknowledging Manu's authorisation of meat-eating in sacrificial context, Bhisma explains to Yudhishthira that "one who abstains from doing so acquires the same merit as that accrued from the performance of even a horse sacrifice" and that "those desirous of heaven perform sacrifice with seeds instead of animals". It is stated in Mahabharata that animal sacrifices were introduced only when people began to resort to violence in the treta yuga, a less pure and compassionate age, and were not present in the satya yuga, 'the golden age'.^[19]

Tirukkuṛaḷ

The Tirukkuṛaḷ, another ancient Indian secular text of Hindu or Jain origin, emphasizes ahimsa and insists on moral vegetarianism or veganism.^[20]: 101 Originally written in the South Indian language of Tamil, the text states moderate diet as a virtuous lifestyle and criticizes "non-vegetarianism" in its Pulaan Maruthal (abstinence from flesh or meat) chapter, through verses 251 through 260.^[21][22][23] Verse 251, for instance, questions "how can one be possessed of kindness, who, to increase his own flesh, eats the flesh of other creatures." It also says that "the wise, who are devoid of mental delusions, do not eat the severed body of other creatures" (verse 258), suggesting that "flesh is nothing but the despicable wound of a mangled body" (verse 257). It continues to say that not eating flesh is a practice more sacred than the most sacred religious practices ever known (verse 259) and that only those who refrain from killing and eating the kill are worthy of veneration (verse 260). This text, written before 400 CE, and sometimes called the Tamil Veda, discusses eating habits and its role in a healthy life (Mitahara), dedicating Chapter 95 of Book II to it.^[24] The Tirukkuṛaḷ states in verses 943 through 945, "eat in moderation, when you feel hungry, foods that are agreeable to your body, refraining from foods that your body finds disagreeable". Valluvar also emphasizes overeating has ill effects on health, in verse 946, as "the pleasures of health abide in the man who eats moderately. The pains of disease dwell with him who eats excessively."^{[24][25][26][27]}

Puranas

The Puranic texts fiercely oppose violence against animals in many places "despite following the pattern of being constrained by the Vedic imperative to nominally accept it in sacrificial contexts". The most important Puranic text, the Bhagavata Purana goes farthest in repudiating animal sacrifice—refraining from harming all living beings is considered the highest dharma. The text states that the sin of harming animals cannot be washed away by performing "sham sacrifices", just as "mud cannot be washed away by mud". It graphically presents the horrific karmic reactions accrued from the performance of animal sacrifices—those who mercilessly cook animals and birds go to kumbhipaka and are fried in boiling oil and those who perform sham sacrifices are themselves cut to pieces in viśasana hell. The Skanda Purana states that the sages were dismayed by animal sacrifice and considered it against dharma, claiming that sacrifice is supposed to be performed with grains and milk. It narrates that animal sacrifice was only permitted to feed the population during a famine, yet the sages did not slaughter animals even as they died of starvation. The Matsya Purana contains a dialogue between sages who disapprove of violence against animals, preferring rites involving oblations of fruits and vegetables. The text states that the negative karma accrued from violence against animals far outweighs any benefits.^[28]

Diet and caste

Per Dumont, in Hindu society, vegetarian castes are regarded to be superior to non-vegetarian castes. Eaters of clean animals like goats and sheep are considered higher compared to those who consume unclean animals like pigs and domesticated fowl (chicken). Carcass eaters are lower to those who consume the meat of animals that have been killed for food. In addition to being an indication of poor social, economic, and ritual status, eating carcasses is considered to be eating impure meat because death makes the animal impure.^[29]

Sanskritisation

The process of Sanskritisation, a term coined by M. N. Srinivas in the 1950s, leads lower castes to adopt practices of ritually higher castes in order to improve the status of their community. One of these practices includes adoption of a vegetarian diet. Examples are the Patidar, and other Gujarati Hindu communities who have adopted Vaishnavism, and vegetarianism that goes with it.^[30][31] This was also seen in the north Indian Chamar caste.^[32]

Contemporary Hindu diet

According to a 2021 Pew Research Center survey, 44% of Hindus say they are vegetarian, and another 39% restrict their consumption of flesh in some way.^[2]

Lacto-vegetarian diet

Main article: Lacto vegetarianism

A Hindu, lacto-vegetarian meal served on a banana leaf

Vegetarianism is a dietary ideal among many Hindus, based on the concept of ahimsa—non-violence and compassion towards all beings.^[1] It is also considered sattvic, associated with qualities such as goodness, balance, and serenity that are conducive to spiritual progress.^[33][34]

Lacto-vegetarianism is favoured by many Hindus; the diet includes milk-based foods and all non-animal derived foods, but excludes meat and eggs.^[35] Reasons for adopting such a diet include the principle of nonviolence (ahimsa) applied to animals,^[36] the intention to offer only vegetarian food to a Hindu's preferred deity and then to receive it back as prasad, and the conviction that non-vegetarian food is detrimental for the mind and for spiritual development.^[33][37]

A typical modern urban Hindu lacto-vegetarian meal is based on a combination of grains such as rice and wheat, legumes, green vegetables, and dairy products.^[38] Depending on the geographical region, the staples may also include millet-based flatbreads. Fat derived from slaughtered animals is avoided.^[39]

A number of Hindus, particularly those following the Vaishnava tradition, refrain from eating onions and garlic, either totally or during the Chaturmasya period (roughly July to November of the Gregorian calendar).^[40] In Maharashtra, some Hindu families also do not eat any eggplant preparations during this period.^[41] Followers of the International Society for Krishna Consciousness (ISKCON, colloquially known as the "Hare Krishnas") abstain from meat, fish, and fowl. Members of the related Pushtimargi sect also avoid certain vegetables such as onion, mushrooms, and garlic out of the belief that these are tamasic (producing dullness, lethargy, and inertia).^[39][42] The mainly Gujarati Swaminarayan movement staunchly adheres to a diet devoid of meat, eggs, seafood, onions, and garlic.^[43]

Non-vegetarian diet

Main article: Non-vegetarian

Further information: Jhatka, Animal sacrifice in Hinduism, Cattle in religion and mythology § Hinduism, Cattle slaughter in India § Hinduism, and Buffalo meat

Machher Jhol is a spicy fish stew, notably in Bengali and Odia cuisines in the eastern part of the Indian subcontinent.

A significant portion of Hindus are non-vegetarians,^[44] although even those who identify as non-vegetarian eat very little meat. India has significantly lower meat consumption than other regions of the world.^{[45] [46]} According to an estimate on diaspora Hindus, only about 10% of Hindus in Suriname are vegetarians and less than five percent of Hindus in Guyana are vegetarians.^[47] Non-vegetarian Indians mostly prefer poultry, fish, other seafood, goat, and sheep as their sources of meat.^[48] In Eastern and coastal south-western regions of India, fish and seafood is the staple of most of the local communities. For economic reasons, even meat-eating Hindus in India can only afford to have lacto-vegetarian meals on most days.^[49][50] Globally, India consumes the least amount of meat per capita.^[51] Hindus who eat meat, often distinguish all other meat from beef. Respect for cattle^[a] is part of Hindu belief, and most Hindus avoid meat sourced from these animals.^[39] Domestic cattle is treated as a member of their owner's family.^[52] But in some part of India, Hindus do consume buffalo meat.^[53][54][55] In Nepal, few Hindus consume Sukuti, a dried meat made from buffalo, lamb, or goat meat.^[56]

Prasada and Naivedya

Prasada offered during Puja ceremony at a home in West Bengal, India

Prasada is a religious offering in Hinduism. Most often it is vegetarian food cooked for devotees after praise and thanksgiving to a deity. Mahaprasada is the consecrated food offered to the deity in a Hindu temple which is then distributed and served to all the devotees regardless of their religious orientation.^[57][58][59] Prasada is closely linked to the term naivedya. The food offered to God is called naivedya, while the sacred food sanctified and returned by God as a blessing is called prasada.

Animal sacrifice

See also: Animal sacrifice in Hinduism

The sacrificed buffalo's head kept in a large brass utensil

Naivedya and prasad can be non-vegetarian food prepared from animals such as goat sacrificed for deity such as Kali in Eastern India (including Kamakhya Temple), or Chhastisgarh.^[60]

Animal sacrifice is practiced by Shaktism tradition where ritual offering is made to a Devi.^{[61] [62]} Animal sacrifice is practiced in the states of Assam, Odisha, Jharkhand, Bihar, West Bengal and Tripura in Eastern India, as well as in the nation of Nepal. The sacrifice involves slaying of goats, chickens, pigeons and male Water buffaloes.^[63][64] In Southern Indian states of Karnataka, Andhra Pradesh, and Tamil Nadu, it is most notably performed in front of local deities or clan deities. In Karnataka, the goddess receiving the sacrifice tends to be Renuka. The animal is either a male buffalo or a goat.^[62] The warrior caste of Rajputs of North India worship their weapons and horses during the nine day Navratri festival; in autumn, and formerly offered a sacrifice of goat or male water buffalo to a goddess revered as Kuldevi (family or clan Goddess) – a practice that continues in some places.^[65][66] The ritual requires slaying of the animal with a single stroke. In the past this ritual was considered a rite of passage into manhood and readiness as a warrior.^[67]

The Kalika Purana distinguishes bali (sacrifice), mahabali (great sacrifice), for the ritual killing of goats, elephants, respectively, though the reference to humans in Shakti theology is symbolic and done in effigy in modern times.^[68]

Diet on Hindu festivals and religious observations

Hindu fasting day lunch menu

The Hindu calendar has many festivals and religious observations, and dishes specific to that festival are prepared.^[69][70]

Festival dishes

Hindus prepare special dishes for different festivals. Kheer and Halwa are two desserts popular for Diwali. Puran poli and Gujia are prepared for Holi in different parts of India.^[71][72]

Diet on fasting days

Hindu people fast on certain days such as Ekadashi, in honour of Vishnu or his avatars: Chaturthi in honour of Ganesha, Pradosha in honour of Shiva and Parvati, Monday in honour of Shiva, Saturday in honour of Hanuman or Shani, Tuesday in honour of Hanuman, as well as Kali, Parvati, Kartikeya, and Ganesha, Sunday in honour of Surya, Thursday in honour of Vishnu or his avatars, Dattatreya, and Brihaspati, Wednesday in honour of Krishna, Vithoba, Ganesha and Budha and Friday in honour of Mahadevi, Durga, Kali, Mariamman, Lakshmi, Sita, Radha, Rukmini, Saraswati, and Santoshi Mata.^[73][74][75] Only certain kinds of foods are allowed to be eaten during the fasting period. These include milk and other dairy products such as curd, fruit and starchy Western food items such as sago,^[76] potatoes,^[77] purple-red sweet potatoes, amaranth seeds,^[78] nuts and shama millet.^[79] Popular fasting dishes include Farari chevdo, Sabudana Khichadi or peanut soup.^[80]

See also

• Animal sacrifice in Hinduism
• Buddhist cuisine
• Buddhist vegetarianism
• Christian dietary laws
• Diet in Sikhism
• Etiquette of Indian dining
• Indian vegetarian cuisine
• Islamic dietary laws
• Kashrut (Jewish Dietary Laws)
• List of diets
• Vegetarian cuisine
• Vegetarian Diet Pyramid
• Vegetarianism and religion
• Sukuti
• Elephant meat

References

Notes

1. Cattle here means animals belonging to the genus Bos, the domestic cows and bulls. It does not include the water buffalo

Citations

1. Sen 2014, p. 1168: "Still, certain attitudes and practices are shared by many Hindus, especially related to food. The concept of ahimsa, or noninjury to all forms of life, emerged in the sixth century BCE, and avoiding meat, especially beef, became a dietary ideal."
2. Corichi, Manolo (8 July 2021). "Eight-in-ten Indians limit meat in their diets, and four-in-ten consider themselves vegetarian". Pew Research Center.
3. Lisa Kemmerer (2011). Animals and World Religions. Oxford University Press. pp. 59–68 (Hinduism), pp. 100–110 (Buddhism). ISBN 978-0-19-979076-0.
4. Marvin Harris (1990), India's sacred cow Archived 2017-03-29 at the Wayback Machine, Anthropology: contemporary perspectives, 6th edition, Editors: Phillip Whitten & David Hunter, Scott Foresman, ISBN 0-673-52074-9, pages 201–204
5. French, Patrick (8 September 2011). "Part I". Liberty or Death: India's Journey to Independence and Division. Penguin UK. ISBN 9780241950418. Retrieved 13 November 2013.
6. Sen 2014, p. 1165.
7. Achaya 1994, p. 31–35.
8. Achaya 1994, p. 53–55.
9. Staples 2020, p. 38–40.
10. Rosen 2020, p. 409–410: "Nonetheless, it is likely that even if flesh eating was widespread, and indulged in by certain sages, it occurred solely within the sacrificial context, or, beyond that, only by hunters and warriors in the forest, who also used it in sacrifice. In fact, this is what is indicated by the vast majority of Vedic texts on the subject, and it is certainly the version that has been passed down in later Hindu traditions. For further proof that meat eating occurred in Vedic culture only within the confines of sacrifice, see Schmidt 2010."
11. Bryant 2006, p. 195–196: "At the same time, preliminary signs of tension or unease with such slaughter are occasionally encountered even in the earlier Vedic period. As early as the Ṛgveda, sensitivity is shown toward the slaughtered beasts; for example, one hymn notes that mantras are chanted so that the animal will not feel pain and will go to heaven when sacrificed. The Sāmaveda says: "we use no sacrificial stake, we slay no victims, we worship entirely by the repetition of sacred verses." In the Taittiriīya Āraṇyaka, although prescriptions for offering a cow at a funeral procession are outlined in one place, this is contradicted a little further in the same text where it is specifically advised to release the cow in this same context, rather than kill her. Such passages hint, perhaps, at proto-tensions with the gory brutality of sacrificial butchery, and fore-run the transition between animals as objects and animals as subjects."
12. Tähtinen, Unto (1976). Ahimsa. Non-Violence in Indian Tradition. London. pp. 2–3 (English translation: Schmidt p. 631). ISBN 0-09-123340-2.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
13. Bryant 2006, p. 196–197.
14. Patrick Olivelle (1991). "From feast to fast: food and the Indian Ascetic". In Gerrit Jan Meulenbeld; Julia Leslie (eds.). Medical Literature from India, Sri Lanka, and Tibet. BRILL. pp. 17–36. ISBN 978-9004095229.
15. Kane, History of the Dharmaśāstras Vol. 2, p. 762
16. Manu; Olivelle, Suman; Manu; Manu (2005). Olivelle, Patrick (ed.). Manu's code of law: a critical edition and translation of the Mānava-Dharmásāstra. South Asia research. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press. pp. 139–141. ISBN 978-0-19-517146-4.
17. Sen 2014, p. 1523–1524: The Manusmrti, one of the most influential and oft-quoted shastras, devotes an entire section to the pros and cons of eating meat. The discussion opens and closes with statements defending the ancient tradition of eating meat for sacrifices. But they bracket passages favoring vegetarianism and nonviolence and condemning meat consumption outside of the sacrifice, with the number of antimeat verses outnumbering pro-meat verses by 25–3."
18. Framarin 2014, p. 203: "It should be noted, however, that no one takes the claims reflected in these verses to be the position that the Manusmṛti actually endorses. Beginning with Medhātithi, the verses are importantly qualified. Medhātithi explains in his commentary to verse 5.28 that "all of this is food, because all is made by God for living entities in adversity (āpadi)" (Dave 1978, p. 36, lines 6–7; emphasis added). In other words, it is in principle morally permissible to eat any living entity, but only so long as there are considerations that override the (presumably direct) prima facie considerations against doing so. Medhātithi’s commentary to 5.30 reinforces this point: "When there is danger to life (prāṇātyaye), meat is certainly to be eaten" (Dave 1978, p. 37, lines 25–26; emphasis added). This implies that excepting mitigating circumstances, meat is not to be eaten.
19. Bryant 2006, p. 198–199.
20. Dharani, D. (2018). "Medicine in Thirukkural, The Universal Veda of Tamil Literature". Proceedings of the Indian History Congress. 79 (2018–19): 101–108. JSTOR 26906235.
21. Kamil Zvelebil (1973). The Smile of Murugan: On Tamil Literature of South India. BRILL Academic. pp. 156–157. ISBN 90-04-03591-5.
22. Krishna, Nanditha (2017). Hinduism and Nature. New Delhi: Penguin Random House. p. 264. ISBN 978-93-8732-654-5.
23. Meenakshi Sundaram, T. P. (1957). "Vegetarianism in Tamil Literature". 15th World Vegetarian Congress 1957. International Vegetarian Union (IVU). Retrieved 17 April 2022. Ahimsa is the ruling principle of Indian life from the very earliest times. ... This positive spiritual attitude is easily explained to the common man in a negative way as "ahimsa" and hence this way of denoting it. Tiruvalluvar speaks of this as "kollaamai" or "non-killing."
24. Tirukkuṛaḷ see Chapter 95, Book 7
25. Tirukkuṛaḷ Translated by V.V.R. Aiyar, Tirupparaithurai: Sri Ramakrishna Tapovanam (1998)
26. Sundaram, P. S. (1990). Tiruvalluvar Kural. Gurgaon: Penguin. p. 115. ISBN 978-0-14-400009-8.
27. "Russell Simmons on his vegan diet, Obama and Yoga". Integral Yoga Magazine. n.d. Retrieved 23 August 2021.
28. Bryant 2006, p. 199–202.
29. Srinivas 1984, pp. 165:"That caste hierarchy is also a dietetic hierarchy is a matter of common knowledge. By and large vegetarian castes are superior to non-vegetarian castes, and there is a hierarchy among non-vegetarian castes. Those who eat clean animals, such as sheep and goat, are superior to those who eat unclean animals, such as domestic fowl and pig. People who eat carrion are lower than those who eat the flesh of animals slaughtered for the table. Eating carrion is eating impure meat, for death renders the animal impure, besides carrion-eating is a sure sign of low social, economic and ritual status. It may be stated at this point that many things which the Untouchable has to do with a dead cow or goat, are matters which are beyond his control. He has to do them. Otherwise, the dominant castes will beat him up, and probably also the members of his family"..
30. Sopher, David E. (July 1968). "Pilgrim Circulation in Gujarat". Geographical Review. 58 (3): 392–425. doi:10.2307/212564. JSTOR 212564.
31. Desai, Amit (April 2008). "Subaltern Vegetarianism: Witchcraft, Embodiment and Sociality in Central India". South Asia: Journal of South Asian Studies. 31 (1): 96–117. doi:10.1080/00856400701874734. ISSN 0085-6401.
32. Jaffrelot, Christophe (September 2000). "Sanskritization vs. Ethnicization in India: Changing Indentities and Caste Politics before Mandal". Asian Survey. 40 (5): 756–766. doi:10.2307/3021175. JSTOR 3021175.
33. Lepes, Naina (2007). The Bhagavad Gita and inner transformation (1 ed.). Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass Publ. pp. 352–353. ISBN 978-81-208-3186-5.
34. Michael Keene (2002), Religion in Life and Society, Folens Limited, p. 122, ISBN 978-1-84303-295-3, retrieved May 18, 2009
35. Paul Insel (2013), Discovering Nutrition, Jones & Bartlett Publishers, ISBN 978-1284021165, page 231
36. Tähtinen, Unto (1976). Ahiṃsā: non-violence in Indian tradition. London: Rider. pp. 107–109. ISBN 978-0-09-123340-2.
37. Mahabharata 12.257 (note that Mahabharata 12.257 is 12.265 according to another count); Bhagavad Gita 9.26; Bhagavata Purana 7.15.7.
38. Sanford, A. Whitney (2013-04-03). "Gandhi's Agrarian Legacy: Practicing Food, Justice, and Sustainability in India". Journal for the Study of Religion, Nature and Culture. 7 (1): 65–87. doi:10.1558/jsrnc.v7i1.65. ISSN 1749-4915.
39. Nesbitt, Eleanor M. (2004). Intercultural education: ethnographic and religious approaches. The Sussex library of religious beliefs & practices. Brighton ; Portland: Sussex Academic Press. pp. 25–27. ISBN 978-1-84519-033-0.
40. J. Gordon Melton (2011). Religious Celebrations: L-Z. ABC-CLIO. pp. 172–173. ISBN 978-1-59884-205-0.
41. B. V. Bhanu (2004). People of India: Maharashtra. Popular Prakashan. p. 851. ISBN 978-81-7991-101-3.
42. Narayanan, Vasudha. “The Hindu Tradition”. In A Concise Introduction to World Religions, ed. Willard G. Oxtoby and Alan F. Segal. New York: Oxford University Press, 2007
43. Williams, Raymond. An Introduction to Swaminarayan Hinduism. 1st. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001. 159
44. Staples 2020, p. 26.
45. Jain 2011, p. 120–121: "Although asceticism, fasting, and celibacy are practiced only by a minority of Indians, the main diet of the majority of Indians largely consists of rice, wheat, pulses, and vegetables. Even those who are classified as "non-vegetarians" depend largely on vegetarian food as the chief components of their diet while eggs, meat, and fish are consumed occasionally. In 2002, India’s meat consumption was 5,456,264 metric tons, much less than other major meat-consuming regions. This shows that even with the advent of modernity and globalization Indians have successfully preserved their vegetarian habits that were laid down by their dharmic traditions several millennia ago."
46. CHAKRAVARTI, A.K (2007). "Cultural dimensions of diet and disease in india.". City, Society, and Planning: Society. Concept Publishing Company. pp. 151–. ISBN 978-81-8069-460-8.
47. "Hindus of South America".
48. Ridgwell and Ridgway (1987), Food Around the World, Oxford University Press, ISBN 978-0198327288, page 67
49. Puskar-Pasewicz, Margaret, ed. (2010). Cultural encyclopedia of vegetarianism. Santa Barbara, CA: Greenwood. p. 40[coastal south-western ]. ISBN 978-0313375569. Retrieved 14 September 2017.
50. Speedy, Andrew W. (November 2003). "Global Production and Consumption of Animal Source Foods". The Journal of Nutrition. 133 (11): 4048S–4053S. doi:10.1093/jn/133.11.4048S.
51. Devi, Subramaniam Mohana; Balachandar, Vellingiri; Lee, Sang In; Kim, In Ho (2014-08-31). "An Outline of Meat Consumption in the Indian Population - A Pilot Review". Korean Journal for Food Science of Animal Resources. 34 (4): 507–515. doi:10.5851/kosfa.2014.34.4.507. ISSN 1225-8563. PMC 4662155. PMID 26761289.
52. Bhaskarananda, Swami (2002). The Essentials of Hinduism. Seattle: The Vedanta Society of Western Washington. p. 60. ISBN 978-1884852046.
53. No Ban On Buffalo Meat: Maharashtra CM Fadanavis, retrieved 2024-03-26
54. "Is Buffalo Meat Legal In India & What is Buffalo Meat Called? - GenV". GenV. 2021-08-24. Retrieved 2024-03-26.
55. "Do Hindus Eat Buffalo?". 2023-10-16. Retrieved 2024-03-26.
56. "Sukuti:The Dry Meat Delicacy". ECSNEPAL. Retrieved 5 May 2018.
57. Chitrita Banerji, 2010, Eating India: Exploring the Food and Culture of the Land of Spices.
58. Behera, Subhakanta (2002). Construction of an identity discourse: Oriya literature and the Jagannath lovers (1866-1936)]. pp. 140–177.
59. Pattinson, Susan (2011). The Final Journey: Complete Hospice Care for the Departing Vaishnavas. p. 220.
60. Samanta, S. (1994). "The "Self-Animal" and Divine Digestion: Goat Sacrifice to the Goddess Kālī in Bengal". The Journal of Asian Studies. 53 (3): 779–803. doi:10.2307/2059730. hdl:10919/74386. JSTOR 2059730.
61. Fuller, Christopher John (2004). "4". The Camphor Flame: Popular Hinduism and Society in India (Revised and Expanded ed.). Princeton University Press. p. 83. ISBN 978-0-691-12048-5. ASIN 069112048X.
62. Hiltebeitel, Alf (February 1980). "Rāma and Gilgamesh: the sacrifices of the water buffalo and the bull of heaven". History of Religions. 19 (3): 187–195. doi:10.1086/462845. JSTOR 1062467. S2CID 162925746.
63. Fuller 2004, pp. 83–4.
64. Christopher John Fuller (2004). The Camphor Flame: Popular Hinduism and Society in India. Princeton University Press. p. 141. ISBN 978-0-691-12048-5.
65. Harlan, Lindsey (2003). The goddesses' henchmen gender in Indian hero worship. Oxford [u.a.]: Oxford University Press. pp. 45 with footnote 55, 58–59. ISBN 978-0-19-515426-9. Retrieved 14 October 2016.
66. Hiltebeitel, Alf; Erndl, Kathleen M. (2000). Is the Goddess a Feminist?: the Politics of South Asian Goddesses. Sheffield, England: Sheffield Academic Press. p. 77. ISBN 978-0-8147-3619-7.
67. Harlan, Lindsey (1992). Religion and Rajput Women. Berkeley, California: University of California Press. pp. 61, 88. ISBN 978-0-520-07339-5.
68. "" Pramatha Nath Bose, A History of Hindu Civilization During British Rule, vol. 1, p. 65
69. Ferro-Luzzi, G. Eichinger. “Food for the Gods in South India: An Exposition of Data.” Zeitschrift Für Ethnologie 103, no. 1 (1978): 86–108. http://www.jstor.org/stable/25841633.
70. Babb, L. A. (1975). The divine hierarchy: Popular Hinduism in central India. Columbia University Press.pages=137-139
71. Engfer, L (2004). Desserts around the world. Lerner Publications. p. 12. ISBN 9780822541653.
72. Taylor Sen, Colleen (2014). Feasts and Fasts A History of Indian Food. London: Reaktion Books. p. 105. ISBN 978-1-78023-352-9. Retrieved 10 June 2016.
73. Dalal 2010, p. 6.
74. "Hindu Fasting".
75. "Weekly Rituals in the Practice of Hinduism".
76. Arnott, Margaret L. (1975). Gastronomy : the anthropology of food and food habitys. The Hague: Mouton. p. 319. ISBN 978-9027977397. Retrieved 31 October 2016.
77. Walker, Harlan, ed. (1997). Food on the move : proceedings of the Oxford Symposium on Food and Cookery 1996, [held in September 1996 at Saint Antony's College, Oxford]. Devon, England: Prospect Books. p. 291. ISBN 978-0-907325-79-6. Retrieved 31 October 2016.
78. Amaranth: Modern Prospects for an Ancient Crop. National Academies. 1984. p. 6. ISBN 9780309324458. NAP:14295.
79. Dalal 2010, p. 7.
80. Dalal 2010, p. 63.

Bibliography

• Achaya, K. T. (1994). Indian Food: A Historical Companion. Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-562845-4. OCLC 31901247.
• Bryant, Edwin (2006). "Strategies of Vedic Subversion: The Emergence of Vegetarianism in Post-Vedic India". In Waldau, Paul; Patton, Kimberly Christine (eds.). A Communion of Subjects: Animals in Religion, Science, and Ethics. Columbia University Press. ISBN 978-0-231-50997-8. OCLC 144569913.
• Dalal, Tarla (2010). Faraal Foods for fasting days. Mumbai: Sanjay and Co. ISBN 9789380392028.
• Framarin, Christopher G. (2014). "The Moral Standing of Animals and Plants in the Manusmṛti". Philosophy East and West. 64 (1): 192–217. doi:10.1353/pew.2014.0006.
• Jain, Pankaj (2011). Dharma and Ecology of Hindu Communities: Sustenance and Sustainability. Ashgate. ISBN 978-1-4094-0592-4.
• Rosen, Steven J. (2020). "Vaishnav Vegetarianism: Scriptural and Theological Perspectives on the Diet of Devotion". In Narayanan, Vasudha (ed.). The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Religion and Materiality (First ed.). Wiley. ISBN 978-1-118-68832-8. OCLC 1158591615.
• Schmidt, Hanns-Peter (2010). "Ahiṃsā and Rebirth". In Alsdorf, Ludwig (ed.). The History of Vegetarianism and Cow-Veneration in India. Routledge. ISBN 9780203859599.
• Sen, Colleen Taylor (2014). "Hinduism and Food". In Thompson, Paul B.; Kaplan, David M. (eds.). Encyclopedia of Food and Agricultural Ethics. Springer. ISBN 978-94-007-0929-4.
• Staples, James (2020). Sacred Cows and Chicken Manchurian. Seattle: University of Washington Press. ISBN 978-0-295-74789-7. OCLC 1145911567.
• Srinivas, M.N. (1984). "Some reflections on the nature of caste hierarchy". Contributions to Indian Sociology. 18 (2). SAGE Publications: 151–167. doi:10.1177/006996678401800201. ISSN 0069-9667. S2CID 144630309.