Noise reduction

For the reduction of a sound's volume, see Soundproofing. For the noise reduction of machinery and products, see Noise control.

Noise reduction is the process of removing noise from a signal. Noise reduction techniques exist for audio and images. Noise reduction algorithms may distort the signal to some degree. Noise rejection is the ability of a circuit to isolate an undesired signal component from the desired signal component, as with common-mode rejection ratio.

All signal processing devices, both analog and digital, have traits that make them susceptible to noise. Noise can be random with an even frequency distribution (white noise), or frequency-dependent noise introduced by a device's mechanism or signal processing algorithms.

In electronic systems, a major type of noise is hiss created by random electron motion due to thermal agitation. These agitated electrons rapidly add and subtract from the output signal and thus create detectable noise.

In the case of photographic film and magnetic tape, noise (both visible and audible) is introduced due to the grain structure of the medium. In photographic film, the size of the grains in the film determines the film's sensitivity, more sensitive film having larger-sized grains. In magnetic tape, the larger the grains of the magnetic particles (usually ferric oxide or magnetite), the more prone the medium is to noise. To compensate for this, larger areas of film or magnetic tape may be used to lower the noise to an acceptable level.

In general

Noise reduction algorithms tend to alter signals to a greater or lesser degree. The local signal-and-noise orthogonalization algorithm can be used to avoid changes to the signals.^[1]

Noise reduction techniques in Digital Signal Processing (DSP) are essential for improving the quality of signals in various applications, including audio processing, telecommunications, and biomedical engineering. Noise, which is unwanted random variation in signals, can degrade signal clarity and accuracy. DSP offers a range of algorithms to reduce noise while preserving the integrity of the original signal.

Spectral subtraction

Spectral subtraction is one of the simplest and most widely used noise reduction techniques, especially in speech processing. It works by estimating the power spectrum of the noise during silent periods and subtracting this noise spectrum from the noisy signal. This technique assumes that noise is additive and relatively stationary. While effective, spectral subtraction can introduce "musical noise," a type of artificial noise, if the noise spectrum estimate is inaccurate.

Applications: Primarily used in audio signal processing, including mobile telephony and hearing aids.

Advantages: Simple to implement and computationally efficient.

Limitations: Tends to perform poorly in the presence of non-stationary noise, and can introduce artifacts.

Adaptive filtering

Adaptive filters are highly effective in situations where noise is unpredictable or non-stationary. In adaptive filtering, the filter's parameters are continuously adjusted to minimize the difference between the desired signal and the actual output. The Least Mean Squares (LMS) and Recursive Least Squares (RLS) algorithms are commonly used for adaptive noise cancellation.

Applications: Used in active noise-canceling headphones, biomedical devices (e.g., EEG and ECG processing), and communications.

Advantages: Can adapt to changing noise environments in real-time.

Limitations: Higher computational requirements, which may be challenging for real-time applications on low-power devices.

Wiener filtering

Wiener filtering is a statistical approach to noise reduction that minimizes the mean square error between the desired signal and the actual output. This technique relies on knowledge of both the signal and noise power spectra, and it can provide optimal noise reduction if these spectra are accurately estimated.

Applications: Frequently applied in image processing, audio restoration, and radar.

Advantages: Provides optimal noise reduction for stationary noise.

Limitations: Requires accurate estimates of the signal and noise statistics, which may not always be feasible in real-world applications.

Kalman filtering

Kalman filtering is a recursive algorithm that estimates the state of a dynamic system from a series of noisy measurements. While typically used for tracking and prediction, it is also applicable to noise reduction, especially for signals that can be modeled as time-varying. Kalman filtering is particularly effective in applications where the signal is dynamic and the noise characteristics vary over time.

Applications: Used in speech enhancement, radar, and control systems.

Advantages: Provides excellent performance for time-varying signals with non-stationary noise.

Limitations: Requires a mathematical model of the system dynamics, which may be complex to design for certain applications.

Wavelet-based denoising

Wavelet-based denoising (or wavelet thresholding) decomposes the signal into different frequency components using a wavelet transform and then removes the noise by thresholding the wavelet coefficients. This method is effective for signals with sharp transients, like biomedical signals, because wavelet transforms can provide both time and frequency information.

Applications: Commonly used in image processing, ECG and EEG signal denoising, and audio processing.

Advantages: Preserves sharp signal features and offers flexibility in handling non-stationary noise.

Limitations: The choice of wavelet basis and thresholding parameters significantly impacts performance, requiring careful tuning.

Non-local means denoising

Non-local means (NLM) is an advanced noise reduction technique that uses redundancy in the signal by averaging similar patches across the signal or image. While computationally more demanding, NLM is highly effective in removing noise from images and audio signals without blurring.

Applications: Applied primarily in image denoising, especially in medical imaging and photography.

Advantages: Preserves details and edges in images.

Limitations: Computationally intensive, often requiring hardware acceleration or approximations for real-time applications.

In seismic exploration

Boosting signals in seismic data is especially crucial for seismic imaging,^[2][3] inversion,^[4][5] and interpretation,^[6] thereby greatly improving the success rate in oil & gas exploration.^[7][8][9] The useful signal that is smeared in the ambient random noise is often neglected and thus may cause fake discontinuity of seismic events and artifacts in the final migrated image. Enhancing the useful signal while preserving edge properties of the seismic profiles by attenuating random noise can help reduce interpretation difficulties and misleading risks for oil and gas detection.

In audio

Tape hiss is a performance-limiting issue in analog tape recording. This is related to the particle size and texture used in the magnetic emulsion that is sprayed on the recording media, and also to the relative tape velocity across the tape heads.

Four types of noise reduction exist: single-ended pre-recording, single-ended hiss reduction, single-ended surface noise reduction, and codec or dual-ended systems. Single-ended pre-recording systems (such as Dolby HX Pro), work to affect the recording medium at the time of recording. Single-ended hiss reduction systems (such as DNL^[10] or DNR) work to reduce noise as it occurs, including both before and after the recording process as well as for live broadcast applications. Single-ended surface noise reduction (such as CEDAR and the earlier SAE 5000A, Burwen TNE 7000, and Packburn 101/323/323A/323AA and 325^[11]) is applied to the playback of phonograph records to address scratches, pops, and surface non-linearities. Single-ended dynamic range expanders like the Phase Linear Autocorrelator Noise Reduction and Dynamic Range Recovery System (Models 1000 and 4000) can reduce various noise from old recordings. Dual-ended systems (such as Dolby noise-reduction system or dbx) have a pre-emphasis process applied during recording and then a de-emphasis process applied during playback.

Modern digital sound recordings no longer need to worry about tape hiss so analog-style noise reduction systems are not necessary. However, an interesting twist is that dither systems actually add noise to a signal to improve its quality.

Compander-based noise reduction systems

Dual-ended compander noise reduction systems have a pre-emphasis process applied during recording and then a de-emphasis process applied at playback. Systems include the professional systems Dolby A^[10] and Dolby SR by Dolby Laboratories, dbx Professional and dbx Type I by dbx, Donald Aldous' EMT NoiseBX,^[12] Burwen Noise Eliminator [it],^[13][14][15] Telefunken's telcom c4 [de]^[10] and MXR Innovations' MXR^[16] as well as the consumer systems Dolby NR, Dolby B,^[10] Dolby C and Dolby S, dbx Type II,^[10] Telefunken's High Com^[10] and Nakamichi's High-Com II, Toshiba's (Aurex AD-4) adres [ja],^[10][17] JVC's ANRS [ja]^[10][17] and Super ANRS,^[10][17] Fisher/Sanyo's Super D,^[18][10][17] SNRS,^[17] and the Hungarian/East-German Ex-Ko system.^[19][17]

In some compander systems, the compression is applied during professional media production and only the expansion is applied by the listener; for example, systems like dbx disc, High-Com II, CX 20^[17] and UC used for vinyl recordings and Dolby FM, High Com FM and FMX used in FM radio broadcasting.

The first widely used audio noise reduction technique was developed by Ray Dolby in 1966. Intended for professional use, Dolby Type A was an encode/decode system in which the amplitude of frequencies in four bands was increased during recording (encoding), then decreased proportionately during playback (decoding). In particular, when recording quiet parts of an audio signal, the frequencies above 1 kHz would be boosted. This had the effect of increasing the signal-to-noise ratio on tape up to 10 dB depending on the initial signal volume. When it was played back, the decoder reversed the process, in effect reducing the noise level by up to 10 dB.

The Dolby B system (developed in conjunction with Henry Kloss) was a single-band system designed for consumer products. The Dolby B system, while not as effective as Dolby A, had the advantage of remaining listenable on playback systems without a decoder.

The Telefunken High Com integrated circuit U401BR could be utilized to work as a mostly Dolby B–compatible compander as well.^[20] In various late-generation High Com tape decks the Dolby-B emulating D NR Expander functionality worked not only for playback, but, as an undocumented feature, also during recording.

dbx was a competing analog noise reduction system developed by David E. Blackmer, founder of Dbx, Inc.^[21] It used a root-mean-squared (RMS) encode/decode algorithm with the noise-prone high frequencies boosted, and the entire signal fed through a 2:1 compander. dbx operated across the entire audible bandwidth and unlike Dolby B was unusable without a decoder. However, it could achieve up to 30 dB of noise reduction.

Since analog video recordings use frequency modulation for the luminance part (composite video signal in direct color systems), which keeps the tape at saturation level, audio-style noise reduction is unnecessary.

Dynamic noise limiter and dynamic noise reduction

Dynamic noise limiter (DNL) is an audio noise reduction system originally introduced by Philips in 1971 for use on cassette decks.^[10] Its circuitry is also based on a single chip.^[22][23]

It was further developed into dynamic noise reduction (DNR) by National Semiconductor to reduce noise levels on long-distance telephony.^[24] First sold in 1981, DNR is frequently confused with the far more common Dolby noise-reduction system.^[25]

Unlike Dolby and dbx Type I and Type II noise reduction systems, DNL and DNR are playback-only signal processing systems that do not require the source material to first be encoded. They can be used to remove background noise from any audio signal, including magnetic tape recordings and FM radio broadcasts, reducing noise by as much as 10 dB.^[26] They can also be used in conjunction with other noise reduction systems, provided that they are used prior to applying DNR to prevent DNR from causing the other noise reduction system to mistrack.^[27]

One of DNR's first widespread applications was in the GM Delco car stereo systems in US GM cars introduced in 1984.^[28] It was also used in factory car stereos in Jeep vehicles in the 1980s, such as the Cherokee XJ. Today, DNR, DNL, and similar systems are most commonly encountered as a noise reduction system in microphone systems.^[29]

Other approaches

A second class of algorithms work in the time-frequency domain using some linear or nonlinear filters that have local characteristics and are often called time-frequency filters.^{[30][page needed]} Noise can therefore be also removed by use of spectral editing tools, which work in this time-frequency domain, allowing local modifications without affecting nearby signal energy. This can be done manually much like in a paint program drawing pictures. Another way is to define a dynamic threshold for filtering noise, that is derived from the local signal, again with respect to a local time-frequency region. Everything below the threshold will be filtered, everything above the threshold, like partials of a voice or wanted noise, will be untouched. The region is typically defined by the location of the signal's instantaneous frequency,^[31] as most of the signal energy to be preserved is concentrated about it.

Yet another approach is the automatic noise limiter and noise blanker commonly found on HAM radio transceivers, CB radio transceivers, etc. Both of the aforementioned filters can be used separately, or in conjunction with each other at the same time, depending on the transceiver itself.

Software programs

Most digital audio workstations (DAWs) and audio editing software have one or more noise reduction functions.

In images

Images taken with digital cameras or conventional film cameras will pick up noise from a variety of sources. Further use of these images will often require that the noise be reduced either for aesthetic purposes, or for practical purposes such as computer vision.

Types

In salt and pepper noise (sparse light and dark disturbances),^[32] also known as impulse noise,^[33] pixels in the image are very different in color or intensity from their surrounding pixels; the defining characteristic is that the value of a noisy pixel bears no relation to the color of surrounding pixels. When viewed, the image contains dark and white dots, hence the term salt and pepper noise. Generally, this type of noise will only affect a small number of image pixels. Typical sources include flecks of dust inside the camera and overheated or faulty CCD elements.

In Gaussian noise,^[34] each pixel in the image will be changed from its original value by a (usually) small amount. A histogram, a plot of the amount of distortion of a pixel value against the frequency with which it occurs, shows a normal distribution of noise. While other distributions are possible, the Gaussian (normal) distribution is usually a good model, due to the central limit theorem that says that the sum of different noises tends to approach a Gaussian distribution.

In either case, the noise at different pixels can be either correlated or uncorrelated; in many cases, noise values at different pixels are modeled as being independent and identically distributed, and hence uncorrelated.

Removal

Tradeoffs

There are many noise reduction algorithms in image processing.^[35] In selecting a noise reduction algorithm, one must weigh several factors:

• the available computer power and time available: a digital camera must apply noise reduction in a fraction of a second using a tiny onboard CPU, while a desktop computer has much more power and time
• whether sacrificing some real detail is acceptable if it allows more noise to be removed (how aggressively to decide whether variations in the image are noise or not)
• the characteristics of the noise and the detail in the image, to better make those decisions

Chroma and luminance noise separation

In real-world photographs, the highest spatial-frequency detail consists mostly of variations in brightness (luminance detail) rather than variations in hue (chroma detail). Most photographic noise reduction algorithms split the image detail into chroma and luminance components and apply more noise reduction to the former or allows the user to control chroma and luminance noise reduction separately.

Linear smoothing filters

One method to remove noise is by convolving the original image with a mask that represents a low-pass filter or smoothing operation. For example, the Gaussian mask comprises elements determined by a Gaussian function. This convolution brings the value of each pixel into closer harmony with the values of its neighbors. In general, a smoothing filter sets each pixel to the average value, or a weighted average, of itself and its nearby neighbors; the Gaussian filter is just one possible set of weights.

Smoothing filters tend to blur an image because pixel intensity values that are significantly higher or lower than the surrounding neighborhood smear across the area. Because of this blurring, linear filters are seldom used in practice for noise reduction;^{[citation needed]} they are, however, often used as the basis for nonlinear noise reduction filters.

Anisotropic diffusion

Another method for removing noise is to evolve the image under a smoothing partial differential equation similar to the heat equation, which is called anisotropic diffusion. With a spatially constant diffusion coefficient, this is equivalent to the heat equation or linear Gaussian filtering, but with a diffusion coefficient designed to detect edges, the noise can be removed without blurring the edges of the image.

Non-local means

Main article: Non-local means

Another approach for removing noise is based on non-local averaging of all the pixels in an image. In particular, the amount of weighting for a pixel is based on the degree of similarity between a small patch centered on that pixel and the small patch centered on the pixel being de-noised.

Nonlinear filters

A median filter is an example of a nonlinear filter and, if properly designed, is very good at preserving image detail. To run a median filter:

1. consider each pixel in the image
2. sort the neighbouring pixels into order based upon their intensities
3. replace the original value of the pixel with the median value from the list

A median filter is a rank-selection (RS) filter, a particularly harsh member of the family of rank-conditioned rank-selection (RCRS) filters;^[36] a much milder member of that family, for example one that selects the closest of the neighboring values when a pixel's value is external in its neighborhood, and leaves it unchanged otherwise, is sometimes preferred, especially in photographic applications.

Median and other RCRS filters are good at removing salt and pepper noise from an image, and also cause relatively little blurring of edges, and hence are often used in computer vision applications.

Wavelet transform

The main aim of an image denoising algorithm is to achieve both noise reduction^[37] and feature preservation^[38] using the wavelet filter banks.^[39] In this context, wavelet-based methods are of particular interest. In the wavelet domain, the noise is uniformly spread throughout coefficients while most of the image information is concentrated in a few large ones.^[40] Therefore, the first wavelet-based denoising methods were based on thresholding of detail subband coefficients.^{[41][page needed]} However, most of the wavelet thresholding methods suffer from the drawback that the chosen threshold may not match the specific distribution of signal and noise components at different scales and orientations.

To address these disadvantages, nonlinear estimators based on Bayesian theory have been developed. In the Bayesian framework, it has been recognized that a successful denoising algorithm can achieve both noise reduction and feature preservation if it employs an accurate statistical description of the signal and noise components.^[40]

Statistical methods

Statistical methods for image denoising exist as well. For Gaussian noise, one can model the pixels in a greyscale image as auto-normally distributed, where each pixel's true greyscale value is normally distributed with mean equal to the average greyscale value of its neighboring pixels and a given variance.

Let ${\displaystyle \delta _{i}}$ denote the pixels adjacent to the ${\displaystyle i}$th pixel. Then the conditional distribution of the greyscale intensity (on a ${\displaystyle [0,1]}$ scale) at the ${\displaystyle i}$th node is:

${\displaystyle \mathbb {P} {\big (}x(i)=c\mid x(j)\,\forall j\in \delta _{i}{\big )}\propto \exp \left({-{\frac {\beta }{2\lambda }}\sum _{j\in \delta _{i}}{\big (}c-x(j){\big )}^{2}}\right)}$

for a chosen parameter ${\displaystyle \beta \geq 0}$ and variance ${\displaystyle \lambda }$. One method of denoising that uses the auto-normal model uses the image data as a Bayesian prior and the auto-normal density as a likelihood function, with the resulting posterior distribution offering a mean or mode as a denoised image.^[42][43]

Block-matching algorithms

Main article: Block-matching and 3D filtering

A block-matching algorithm can be applied to group similar image fragments of overlapping macroblocks of identical size. Stacks of similar macroblocks are then filtered together in the transform domain and each image fragment is finally restored to its original location using a weighted average of the overlapping pixels.^[44]

Random field

Main article: Shrinkage Fields (image restoration)

Shrinkage fields is a random field-based machine learning technique that brings performance comparable to that of Block-matching and 3D filtering yet requires much lower computational overhead such that it can be performed directly within embedded systems.^[45]

Deep learning

Various deep learning approaches have been proposed to achieve noise reduction^[46] and such image restoration tasks. Deep Image Prior is one such technique that makes use of convolutional neural network and is notable in that it requires no prior training data.^[47]

Software

Most general-purpose image and photo editing software will have one or more noise-reduction functions (median, blur, despeckle, etc.).

See also

General noise issues

• Filter (signal processing)
• Signal subspace

Audio

• Architectural acoustics including Soundproofing
• Click removal
• Codec listening test
• Noise blanker
• Noise print
• Noise-cancelling headphones
• Sound masking

Images and video

• Dark-frame subtraction
• Digital image processing
• Total variation denoising
• Video denoising

Similar problems

• Deblurring

References

1. Chen, Yangkang; Fomel, Sergey (November–December 2015). "Random noise attenuation using local signal-and-noise orthogonalization". Geophysics. 80 (6): WD1–WD9. Bibcode:2015Geop...80D...1C. doi:10.1190/GEO2014-0227.1. S2CID 120440599.
2. Xue, Zhiguang; Chen, Yangkang; Fomel, Sergey; Sun, Junzhe (2016). "Seismic imaging of incomplete data and simultaneous-source data using least-squares reverse time migration with shaping regularization". Geophysics. 81 (1): S11–S20. Bibcode:2016Geop...81S..11X. doi:10.1190/geo2014-0524.1.
3. Chen, Yangkang; Yuan, Jiang; Zu, Shaohuan; Qu, Shan; Gan, Shuwei (2015). "Seismic imaging of simultaneous-source data using constrained least-squares reverse time migration". Journal of Applied Geophysics. 114: 32–35. Bibcode:2015JAG...114...32C. doi:10.1016/j.jappgeo.2015.01.004.
4. Chen, Yangkang; Chen, Hanming; Xiang, Kui; Chen, Xiaohong (2017). "Geological structure guided well log interpolation for high-fidelity full waveform inversion". Geophysical Journal International. 209 (1): 21–31. Bibcode:2016GeoJI.207.1313C. doi:10.1093/gji/ggw343.
5. Gan, Shuwei; Wang, Shoudong; Chen, Yangkang; Qu, Shan; Zu, Shaohuan (2016). "Velocity analysis of simultaneous-source data using high-resolution semblance—coping with the strong noise". Geophysical Journal International. 204 (2): 768–779. Bibcode:2016GeoJI.204..768G. doi:10.1093/gji/ggv484.
6. Chen, Yangkang (2017). "Probing the subsurface karst features using time-frequency decomposition". Interpretation. 4 (4): T533–T542. doi:10.1190/INT-2016-0030.1.
7. Huang, Weilin; Wang, Runqiu; Chen, Yangkang; Li, Huijian; Gan, Shuwei (2016). "Damped multichannel singular spectrum analysis for 3D random noise attenuation". Geophysics. 81 (4): V261–V270. Bibcode:2016Geop...81V.261H. doi:10.1190/geo2015-0264.1.
8. Chen, Yangkang (2016). "Dip-separated structural filtering using seislet transform and adaptive empirical mode decomposition based dip filter". Geophysical Journal International. 206 (1): 457–469. Bibcode:2016GeoJI.206..457C. doi:10.1093/gji/ggw165.
9. Chen, Yangkang; Ma, Jianwei; Fomel, Sergey (2016). "Double-sparsity dictionary for seismic noise attenuation". Geophysics. 81 (4): V261–V270. Bibcode:2016Geop...81V.193C. doi:10.1190/geo2014-0525.1.
10. "High Com - the latest noise reduction system / Noise reduction - silence is golden" (PDF). elektor (UK) – up-to-date electronics for lab and leisure. Vol. 1981, no. 70. February 1981. pp. 2-04–2-09. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2020-07-02. Retrieved 2020-07-02. (6 pages)
11. Audio Noise Suppressor Model 325 Owner's Manual (PDF). Rev. 15-1. Syracuse, New York, USA: Packburn electronics inc. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2021-05-05. Retrieved 2021-05-16. (6+36 pages)
12. R., C. (1965). "Kompander verbessert Magnettonkopie". Radio Mentor (in German). 1965 (4): 301–303.
13. Burwen, Richard S. (February 1971). "A Dynamic Noise Filter". Journal of the Audio Engineering Society. 19 (1).
14. Burwen, Richard S. (June 1971). "110 dB Dynamic Range For Tape" (PDF). Audio: 49–50. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2017-11-13. Retrieved 2017-11-13.
15. Burwen, Richard S. (December 1971). "Design of a Noise Eliminator System". Journal of the Audio Engineering Society. 19 (11): 906–911.
16. Lambert, Mel (September 1978). "MXR Compander". Sound International. Archived from the original on 2020-10-28. Retrieved 2021-04-25.
17. Bergmann, Heinz (1982). "Verfahren zur Rauschminderung bei der Tonsignalverarbeitung" (PDF). radio fernsehen elektronik (rfe) (in German). Vol. 31, no. 11. Berlin, Germany: VEB Verlag Technik [de]. pp. 731–736 [731]. ISSN 0033-7900. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2021-05-05. Retrieved 2021-05-05. p. 731: ExKo Breitband-Kompander Aufnahme/Wiedergabe 9 dB Tonband (NB. Page 736 is missing in the linked PDF.)
18. Haase, Hans-Joachim (August 1980). Written at Aschau, Germany. "Rauschunterdrückung: Kampf dem Rauschen". Systeme und Konzepte. Funk-Technik - Fachzeitschrift für Funk-Elektroniker und Radio-Fernseh-Techniker - Offizielles Mitteilungsblatt der Bundesfachgruppe Radio- und Fernsehtechnik (in German). Vol. 35, no. 8. Heidelberg, Germany: Dr. Alfred Hüthig Verlag GmbH [de]. pp. W293–W296, W298, W300 [W298, W300]. ISSN 0016-2825. Archived from the original on 2021-05-16. Retrieved 2021-04-25.
19. "Stereo Automat MK42 R-Player Budapesti Rádiótechnikai Gyár B". Archived from the original on 2021-04-26. Retrieved 2021-04-25.
20. HIGH COM - The HIGH COM broadband compander utilizing the U401BR integrated circuit (PDF) (Semiconductor information 2.80). AEG-Telefunken. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2016-04-16. Retrieved 2016-04-16.
21. Hoffman, Frank W. (2004). Encyclopedia of Recorded Sound. Vol. 1 (revised ed.). Taylor & Francis.
22. "Noise Reduction". Audiotools.com. 2013-11-10. Archived from the original on 2008-05-13. Retrieved 2009-01-14.
23. "Philips' Dynamic Noise Limiter". Archived from the original on 2008-11-05. Retrieved 2009-01-14.
24. "Dynamic Noise Reduction". ComPol Inc. Archived from the original on 2009-11-21. Retrieved 2009-01-14.
25. "History". Archived from the original on 2007-09-27. Retrieved 2009-01-14.
26. "LM1894 Dynamic Noise Reduction System DNR". Archived from the original on 2008-12-20. Retrieved 2009-01-14.
27. "Audio Terms". Archived from the original on 2008-12-20. Retrieved 2009-01-14.
28. Gunyo, Ed. "Evolution of the Riviera - 1983 the 20th Anniversary". Riviera Owners Association. Archived from the original on 2008-07-05. Retrieved 2009-01-14. (NB. Originally published in The Riview, Vol. 21, No. 6, September/October 2005.)
29. http://www.hellodirect.com/catalog/Product.jhtml?PRODID=11127&CATID=15295%5B‍%5D
30. Boashash, B., ed. (2003). Time-Frequency Signal Analysis and Processing – A Comprehensive Reference. Oxford: Elsevier Science. ISBN 978-0-08-044335-5.
31. Boashash, B. (April 1992). "Estimating and Interpreting the Instantaneous Frequency of a Signal-Part I: Fundamentals". Proceedings of the IEEE. 80 (4): 519–538. doi:10.1109/5.135376.
32. Banerjee, Shounak; Sarkar, Debarpito; Chatterjee, Debraj; Chowdhuri, Sunanda Roy (2021-06-25). "High-Density Salt and Pepper Noise Removal from Colour Images by Introducing New Enhanced Filter". 2021 International Conference on Intelligent Technologies (CONIT). Hubli, India: IEEE. pp. 1–6. doi:10.1109/CONIT51480.2021.9498402. ISBN 978-1-7281-8583-5. S2CID 236920367. Archived from the original on 2021-08-10. Retrieved 2023-02-09.
33. Orazaev, Anzor; Lyakhov, Pavel; Baboshina, Valentina; Kalita, Diana (2023-01-26). "Neural Network System for Recognizing Images Affected by Random-Valued Impulse Noise". Applied Sciences. 13 (3): 1585. doi:10.3390/app13031585. ISSN 2076-3417.
34. Dong, Suge; Dong, Chunxiao; Li, Zishuang; Ge, Mingtao (2022-07-15). "Gaussian Noise Removal Method Based on Empirical Wavelet Transform and Hypothesis Testing". 2022 3rd International Conference on Big Data, Artificial Intelligence and Internet of Things Engineering (ICBAIE). Xi’an, China: IEEE. pp. 24–27. doi:10.1109/ICBAIE56435.2022.9985814. ISBN 978-1-6654-5160-4. S2CID 254999960. Archived from the original on 2022-12-25. Retrieved 2023-02-09.
35. Mehdi Mafi, Harold Martin, Jean Andrian, Armando Barreto, Mercedes Cabrerizo, Malek Adjouadi, "A Comprehensive Survey on Impulse and Gaussian Denoising Filters for Digital Images", Signal Processing, vol. 157, pp. 236–260, 2019.
36. Liu, Puyin; Li, Hongxing (2004). "Fuzzy neural networks: Theory and applications". In Casasent, David P. (ed.). Intelligent Robots and Computer Vision XIII: Algorithms and Computer Vision. Vol. 2353. World Scientific. pp. 303–325. Bibcode:1994SPIE.2353..303G. doi:10.1117/12.188903. ISBN 978-981-238-786-8. S2CID 62705333.
37. Chervyakov, N. I.; Lyakhov, P. A.; Nagornov, N. N. (2018-11-01). "Quantization Noise of Multilevel Discrete Wavelet Transform Filters in Image Processing". Optoelectronics, Instrumentation and Data Processing. 54 (6): 608–616. Bibcode:2018OIDP...54..608C. doi:10.3103/S8756699018060092. ISSN 1934-7944. S2CID 128173262.
38. Craciun, G.; Jiang, Ming; Thompson, D.; Machiraju, R. (March 2005). "Spatial domain wavelet design for feature preservation in computational data sets". IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics. 11 (2): 149–159. doi:10.1109/TVCG.2005.35. ISSN 1941-0506. PMID 15747638. S2CID 1715622. Archived from the original on 2021-04-21. Retrieved 2021-04-21.
39. Gajitzki, Paul; Isar, Dorina; Simu, Călin (November 2018). "Wavelets Based Filter Banks for Real Time Spectrum Analysis". 2018 International Symposium on Electronics and Telecommunications (ISETC). pp. 1–4. doi:10.1109/ISETC.2018.8583929. ISBN 978-1-5386-5925-0. S2CID 56599099. Archived from the original on 2021-04-21. Retrieved 2021-04-21.
40. Forouzanfar, M.; Abrishami-Moghaddam, H.; Ghadimi, S. (July 2008). "Locally adaptive multiscale Bayesian method for image denoising based on bivariate normal inverse Gaussian distributions". International Journal of Wavelets, Multiresolution and Information Processing. 6 (4): 653–664. doi:10.1142/S0219691308002562. S2CID 31201648.
41. Mallat, S. (1998). A Wavelet Tour of Signals Processing. London: Academic Press.
42. Besag, Julian (1986). "On the Statistical Analysis of Dirty Pictures" (PDF). Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological). 48 (3): 259–302. doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1986.tb01412.x. JSTOR 2345426. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2017-08-29. Retrieved 2019-09-24.
43. Seyyedi, Saeed (2018). "Incorporating a Noise Reduction Technique Into X-Ray Tensor Tomography". IEEE Transactions on Computational Imaging. 4 (1): 137–146. doi:10.1109/TCI.2018.2794740. JSTOR 17574903. S2CID 46793582.
44. Dabov, Kostadin; Foi, Alessandro; Katkovnik, Vladimir; Egiazarian, Karen (16 July 2007). "Image denoising by sparse 3D transform-domain collaborative filtering". IEEE Transactions on Image Processing. 16 (8): 2080–2095. Bibcode:2007ITIP...16.2080D. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.219.5398. doi:10.1109/TIP.2007.901238. PMID 17688213. S2CID 1475121.
45. Schmidt, Uwe; Roth, Stefan (2014). Shrinkage Fields for Effective Image Restoration (PDF). Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2014 IEEE Conference on. Columbus, OH, USA: IEEE. doi:10.1109/CVPR.2014.349. ISBN 978-1-4799-5118-5. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2018-01-02. Retrieved 2018-01-03.
46. Dietz, Henry (2022). "An improved raw image enhancement algorithm using a statistical model for pixel value error". Electronic Imaging. 34 (14): 1–6. doi:10.2352/EI.2022.34.14.COIMG-151. AI Image Denoiser is much more aggressive, significantly enhancing details, but also applying heavy smoothing. DxO PureRAW, which directly improves the raw image using deep learning trained on "millions of images analyzed by DxO over 15 years," was easily the most effective of the many denoisers tested.
47. Ulyanov, Dmitry; Vedaldi, Andrea; Lempitsky, Victor (30 November 2017). "Deep Image Prior". arXiv:1711.10925v2 [Vision and Pattern Recognition Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition].

External links

• Recent trends in denoising tutorial
• Noise Reduction in photography