Convenience sampling

Convenience sampling (also known as grab sampling, accidental sampling, or opportunity sampling) is a type of non-probability sampling that involves the sample being drawn from that part of the population that is close to hand.

Convenience sampling is not often recommended by official statistical agencies for research due to the possibility of sampling error and lack of representation of the population.^[1] It can be useful in some situations, for example, where convenience sampling is the only possible option. A trade off exists between this method of quick sampling and accuracy. Collected samples may not represent the population of interest and can be a source of bias, with larger sample sizes reducing the chance of sampling error occurring.

Advantages

Convenience sampling can be used by almost anyone and has been around for generations. One of the reasons that it is most often used is due to the numerous advantages it provides. This method is extremely speedy, easy, readily available, and cost-effective, causing it to be an attractive option to most researchers.^[2]

Expedited data collection

When time is of the essence, many researchers turn to convenience sampling for data collection, as they can swiftly gather data and begin their calculations.^[3] It is useful in time sensitive research because very little preparation is needed to use convenience sampling for data collection. It is also useful when researchers need to conduct pilot data collection in order to gain a quick understanding of certain trends or to develop hypotheses for future research. By rapidly gathering information, researchers and scientists can isolate growing trends, or extrapolate generalized information from local public opinion.^[4]

Ease of research

Researchers who are not looking for accurate sampling, can simply collect their information and move on to other aspects of their study. This type of sampling can be done by simply creating a questionnaire and distributing it to their targeted group. Through this method, researchers can easily finish collecting their data in a matter of hours, free from worrying about whether it is an accurate representation of the population.^[5] This allows for a great ease of research, letting researchers focus on analyzing the data rather than interviewing and carefully selecting participants.

Ready availability

Since most convenience sampling is collected with the populations on hand, the data is readily available for the researcher to collect.^[6] They do not typically have to travel great distances to collect the data, but simply pull from whatever environment is nearby. Having a sample group readily available is important for meeting quotas quickly, and allows for the researcher to even do multiple studies in an expeditious fashion.^[7]  

Cost effectiveness

One of the most important aspects of convenience sampling is its cost-effectiveness. This method allows for funds to be distributed to other aspects of the project. Oftentimes this method of sampling is used to gain funding for a larger, more thorough research project. In this instance, funds are not yet available for a more complete survey, so a quick selection of the population will be used to demonstrate a need for the completed project.^[8]

Disadvantages

Even though convenience sampling can be easy to obtain, its disadvantages can outweigh this advantage. This sampling technique may be more appropriate for one type of study and less for another.

Bias

The results of the convenience sampling cannot be generalized to the target population because of the potential bias of the sampling technique due to the under-representation of subgroups in the sample in comparison to the population of interest. The bias of the sample cannot be measured. Therefore, inferences based on convenience sampling should be made only about the sample itself.^[9]

Power

Convenience sampling is characterized with insufficient power to identify differences of population subgroups.^[10]

Measurement of the sampling error

Convenience sampling does not make possible the computation of a reliable estimate for the sampling error due to the natural variability in the population of interest. This is because the probability that an individual in the population will be sampled is unknown, as is the case for other non-probability sampling methods.^[1][11]

References

1. Government of Canada, Statistics Canada (2021-09-02). "3.2.3 Non-probability sampling". www150.statcan.gc.ca. Retrieved 2024-03-29.
2. Henry, Gary T. (1990). Practical sampling ([10. Nachdr.] ed.). Newbury Park: Sage Publications. ISBN 978-0803929586.
3. Wright, Julius Sim, Chris (2002). Research in health care : concepts, designs and methods (Reprinted. ed.). Cheltenham: N. Thornes. ISBN 978-0748737185.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
4. Given, Lisa M., ed. (2008). The Sage encyclopedia of qualitative research methods. Los Angeles, Calif.: Sage Publications. ISBN 978-1-4129-4163-1.
5. Given, Lisa (2008). "Convenience Sample". The SAGE Encyclopedia of Qualitative Research Methods. SAGE Publications. doi:10.4135/9781412963909.n68. ISBN 9781412941631.
6. Christensen, Burke Johnson, Larry (2012). Educational research : quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, Calif.: SAGE Publications. ISBN 978-1-4129-7828-6.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
7. Palinkas, Lawrence A.; Horwitz, Sarah M.; Green, Carla A.; Wisdom, Jennifer P.; Duan, Naihua; Hoagwood, Kimberly (6 November 2013). "Purposeful Sampling for Qualitative Data Collection and Analysis in Mixed Method Implementation Research". Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research. 42 (5): 533–544. doi:10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y. PMC 4012002. PMID 24193818.
8. Teddlie, Charles; Yu, Fen (January 2007). "Mixed Methods Sampling". Journal of Mixed Methods Research. 1 (1): 77–100. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.609.692. doi:10.1177/2345678906292430. S2CID 220286890.
9. Bornstein, Marc H.; Jager, Justin; Putnick, Diane L. (28 April 2017). "Sampling in Developmental Science: Situations, Shortcomings, Solutions, and Standards". Developmental Review. 33 (4): 357–370. doi:10.1016/j.dr.2013.08.003. ISSN 0273-2297. PMC 4286359. PMID 25580049.
10. Bornstein, Marc H.; Jager, Justin; Putnick, Diane L. (28 April 2017). "Sampling in Developmental Science: Situations, Shortcomings, Solutions, and Standards". Developmental Review. 33 (4): 357–370. doi:10.1016/j.dr.2013.08.003. ISSN 0273-2297. PMC 4286359. PMID 25580049.
11. "Statistics - Sampling, Surveys, Methods | Britannica". www.britannica.com. Retrieved 2024-03-29.