Confidence accounting

Confidence accounting is a method of accounting whereby some of the figures are expressed not as single point estimates, but rather as probability distributions. Under Confidence Accounting, the end results of audits would be presentations of distributions for major entries in the profit & loss, balance sheet and cashflow statements. The proposed benefits of Confidence Accounting include a fairer representation of financial results, reduced footnotes, more measurable audit quality and a mitigation of mark-to-market perturbations.

History

This method is in the discussion stage and has not yet been adopted by any accountancy body, though events and publications have been sponsored by the Association of Chartered Certified Accountants and some other events by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of Scotland.

The term "confidence accounting" was first adopted in the mid-2000s by the Long Finance initiative, having grown out of earlier publications that referred to "stochastic accounting".

Advantages

Confidence accounting has the alleged advantages of:

• Being more scientific.^[1] Most scientific experimental results are expressed as expected values and some quantisation of the error involved, accounts are not.
• Giving a fairer view of the risk associated with the accounts. For example a company may own drilling rights to a potential oilfield. The value of this asset could be zero, or could be immense. If this is not known then a distribution would be a more faithful representation of the asset value, rather than a single estimate of the mean value.
• Holding the accountants responsible^[2] Accounts from previous years can be retrospectively checked against the forecasts, to see if, for example an accountancy firm actually got 90% of its accounts within the 90% error band forecast.

Criticism

Confidence accounting can be criticized for:

• adding further complexity to an already complex subject, although its supporters claim that this method could actually reduce the size of accounts.
• the alleged advantages of holding the accountants responsible can be evaded by accountants claiming (with some justification) that the forecast distributions do not take into account unforeseen macroeconomic factors.
• no external party having both the power and the interest to make this happen.^[3]

External links

• Confidence Accounting: A Proposal published in 2012 by ACCA, CISI and Long Finance
• Confidence Accounting discussion and reports

References

1. "Audit is all about measurement, yet in practice financial audit is virtually bereft of all the usual scientific terminology one finds around measurement: confidence intervals, range estimates, sampling techniques probability distributions. In short, we believe that financial audits need to be more scientific". Page 145 "The Price of Fish" by Michael Mainelli and Ian Harris ISBN 978-1-85788-571-2
2. "Intriguingly, the overreliance on single numbers ensures that auditors get off very,very lightly, practically skipping away......We advocate forcing auditors to lay these ranges out clearly and to provide indemnities to support their ranged opinions." Page 146 "The Price of Fish" by Michael Mainelli and Ian Harris ISBN 978-1-85788-571-2
3. Making financial reform happen: Confidence Accounting http://decisionworkshops.com/#/financial-reform/4570124080