Body odour and sexual attraction

Odour is sensory stimulation of the olfactory membrane of the nose^[1] by a group of molecules.^[2] Certain body odours are connected to human sexual attraction.^[3][4] Humans can make use of body odour subconsciously to identify whether a potential mate will pass on favourable traits to their offspring. Body odour may provide significant cues about the genetic quality, health^[5] and reproductive success of a potential mate.^[6][7]

Body odour affects sexual attraction in a number of ways including through human biology, the menstrual cycle and fluctuating asymmetry. The olfactory membrane plays a role in smelling and subconsciously assessing another human's pheromones.^[8] It also affects the sexual attraction of insects and mammals. The major histocompatibility complex genes are important for the immune system, and appear to play a role in sexual attraction via body odour. Studies have shown that body odour is strongly connected with attraction in heterosexual females. The women in one study ranked body odour as more important for attraction than "looks". Humans may not simply depend on visual and verbal senses to be attracted to a possible partner/mate.^[9]

Olfactory epithelium

The olfactory epithelium is a thick yellow/brown structure, about one inch square, located in the upper nasal cavity of the human nose. Made up of olfactory receptors and glands, the epithelium is used as a tool to smell others' body odour and pheromones.^[10] Chemicals that produce odour pass through the olfactory epithelium to the olfactory bulbs, which contain biological receptors that detect the chemicals, and respond with an electrical signal transmitted to the brain by the olfactory nerves.^[11] The olfactory epithelium plays a large role in why humans are attracted to persons biologically rather than physically; this relates directly to the sense of smell and not physical appearance. Olfactory communication is common in all animals and recent studies have shown that humans have this communication trait as well. This kind of communication happens subconsciously, and often influences a person's attraction to another.^[8]

Pheromones

Pheromones are chemical messengers produced and emitted by the body that contribute significantly to interpersonal attraction.^[8] The two types of pheromones include signal and primer, each playing a distinct role in human behavior. Signal pheromones act as attractants and repellents; they are classified short-term behavioral pheromones. Primer pheromones produce long term changes in human behavior and hormone production. The vomeronasal organ is used to detect the pheromones of others. Pheromones emitted from sweat glands play a role in sexual attraction, sexual repulsion, mother–infant bonding, and menstrual cycles.^[8]

Human sex pheromones

This section is an excerpt from Human sex pheromones.[edit]

No study has led to the isolation of true human sex pheromones, although various researchers have investigated the possibility of their existence.^[12][13]

Pheromones, in general, are secreted chemical substances by organisms that trigger a social reaction in the same species. Sex pheromones are a special type of olfactory signal, produced to attract the opposite sex, to encourage mating or to perform some other function closely related to sexual reproduction. While humans are highly dependent upon visual cues, smells can also play a role in sociosexual behaviors. An inherent difficulty in studying human pheromones is the need for cleanliness and odorlessness in human participants.^[14]

Experiments have focused on three classes of putative human sex pheromones: axillary steroids, vaginal aliphatic acids and stimulators of the vomeronasal organ.

Axillary steroids are produced by the testicles, ovaries, apocrine glands and adrenal glands.^[15] These chemicals are not biologically active until puberty when sex steroids influence their activity.^[16] The activity change during puberty suggests that humans communicate through odors.^[15] Several axillary steroids have been described as possible human pheromones: androstadienol, androstadienone, androstenone, androstenol, and androsterone.

Androstenol is the putative female pheromone.^[16] In a 1978 study by Kirk-Smith, people wearing surgical masks treated with androstenol or untreated were shown pictures of people, animals and buildings and asked to rate their attractiveness.^[17] Individuals with their masks treated with androstenol rated their photographs as being "warmer" and "more friendly".^[17] The best-known case study involves the synchronization of menstrual cycles among women based on unconscious odor cues, the McClintock effect, named after the primary investigator, Martha McClintock, of the University of Chicago.^[18][19] A group of women were exposed to a whiff of perspiration from other women. Depending on the time in the month the sweat was collected (before, during, or after ovulation), there was an association with the recipient woman's menstrual cycle to speed up or slow down. The 1971 study proposed two types of pheromones involved: "One, produced prior to ovulation, shortens the ovarian cycle; and the second, produced just at ovulation, lengthens the cycle". However, recent studies and reviews of the methodology have called the validity of her results into question.^[20][21] A 2013 meta-review of existing studies showed that the syncing of ovarian cycles likely did not exist.^[22]

Androstenone is postulated to be secreted only by men as an attractant for women and is also thought to affect their mood positively. It seems to have different effects on women, depending on where a female is in her menstrual cycle, with the highest sensitivity to it during ovulation.^[16] In 1983, study participants exposed to androstenone were shown to undergo changes in skin conductance.^[23] Androstenone has been found to be perceived as more pleasant to women at a woman's time of ovulation. It is hypothesized that this may be a way for a male to detect an ovulating female who would be more willing to be involved in sexual interaction.^{[12][13][14][24]}

Biology

There is a relationship between various aspects of human biology and genetics with sexual attraction. This includes the role of the major histocompatibility complex (MHC), the human leukocyte antigen (HLA) and their different heterozygotic variations. Such genetic factors may play a role in sexual selection.^[25] Signalling odours in reproduction are called attractants; their function is to bring about successful mating.^[2]

The MHC (major histocompatibility complex) is a group of genes essential for the immune system, playing an important role in immunological recognition.^[26] These olfactory cues are involved in mate choice and preferences. HLA refers to the human form of MHC,^[26] and is a gene complex which encodes the MHC.

MHC

See also: Major histocompatibility complex and sexual selection

There is a correlation between mate choice, odour preference and genetic similarity at the MHC.^[26] Unique body smells are heavily influenced by MHC; these olfactory cues are probably involved in mate choice and preferences.^[27]

The Major Histocompatibility Complex (MHC) shown presenting peptides to the immunological defence cells

MHC is expressed codominantly; a more diverse set of MHC genes leads to a stronger immune system.^[28] Women prefer male partners with differing MHC genes from themselves. An evolutionary explanation is that females are attracted to males with MHC alleles different from their own, to provide their offspring with a stronger immune system.^[29]

Females not using hormonal contraceptives were more attracted to the scent of males with dissimilar MHCs. Females currently using hormonal contraceptives preferred the scent of men with MHCs similar to their own.^[30] The scent of an individual with low fluctuating asymmetry is universally more attractive.^[31]

The increased attraction between people of dissimilar MHCs may help to prevent incest and subsequent birth defects.^[32] This inbreeding avoidance hypothesis proposes that biases towards heterozygotic alleles prevent harmful genetic consequences which can arise from mating with genetic family members. Olfactory cues can be used to recognise kin.^[33]

Couples who have many failed attempts at conception share a considerably larger amount of genes than those who are able to conceive without problems.^[34] If, for these genetically similar couples, there is a successful conception, the babies are often born early or underweight.^[35]

A third hypothesis explaining the function of dissimilar MHC mate preferences, the parasite hypothesis, suggests that MHC heterozygotes may be resistant to rapidly evolving parasites.^[29]

HLA

The human leukocyte antigen system is a protein complex which is encoded by MHC in humans. Over thirty olfactory receptor genes have been located at the HLA class I region,^[36] which presents peptides from inside the cell to be destroyed by the immune system. HLA- linked olfactory receptor genes can therefore provide a possible mechanism for detecting HLA- specific odours.^[37]

Androstenol, found in fresh male sweat, is attractive to women.

Men and women are attracted to the pheromones they produce and HLA is related to the perceptions of other peoples' odours.^[38] Men produce androstenol and androstenone. Androstenol is produced by fresh male sweat and is most attractive to women, while androstenone is produced once the sweat is exposed to oxygen and is highly unpleasant to women.

Studies have shown that women who are at the most fertile stage of their menstrual cycle prefer the smell of men that have higher testosterone levels.^[39] Heterozygosity of HLA can also be detected through scent: in this case, heterozygosity confers greater ability to recognize a wider variety of antigens. Women, especially when not using hormonal contraceptives, are more attracted to the scent of men heterozygous for HLA.

Androstenone, from stale male sweat, is unattractive.

However, the same attraction and mate preferences are not held by men for heterozygous women. Men are, however, more attracted to the scent of women with rare HLA alleles.^[40] Men's arousal can be influenced by a variety of odours. For example; pumpkin pie, liquorice, doughnuts, and lavender can increase penile blood flow consequently causing arousal.^[41]

Human pheromones and facial attraction

Two types of male pheromones: 5α-androst-16-en-3-one (MP1, androstenone) and 4,16-androstadien-3-one (MP2, androstadienone) and one type of female pheromone: 1,3,5(10),16-estratetrael-3-ol (FP, estratetraenol) are used as signals of mating quality. Studies^[42] showed that MP2 has the strongest response produced by female vomeronasal organ (VNO), which is the first stage of the olfactory system. Sex-difference processing in the hypothalamus has been found between female and male pheromone, including in the VNO, where opposite-sex pheromones have different surface potential.^[42][43][44]

Studies have illustrated a relationship between human facial attraction and pheromones.^[45] Individuals rated those of the opposite sex as more attractive if they preferred the individual's pheromones' odour. It was also demonstrated that partners in a long-term relationship would have higher concordance between two types of signals of mating quality, vision and olfaction. In addition, no difference was found between two types of male pheromones in women's preference aside from the location of pheromones production.

Body odour and menstrual cycle changes

See also: Ovulatory shift hypothesis

Women's fertility levels shift dramatically throughout the menstrual cycle, so the period surrounding ovulation is extremely important because it represents the peak period of reproductive fertility.^[46] As conception is most likely to occur during a woman's brief fertile period, evolutionary theories suggest that men possess adaptations designed to maximize their reproductive success during this period.^[46] Women's fertility shapes male mating behaviour, many studies have shown that being exposed to the scent of women's fertility led men to display greater implicit accessibility to mating-related concepts, males also judged the odours of women during the follicular phase as more pleasant and 'sexy' than odours during the luteal (non-ovulatory) phase.^[4][46] Olfaction, therefore, transmits information relevant to human mate selection, through which men are capable of detecting shifts in women's fertility.^[4][46]

There is now also considerable evidence from psychological studies that women's preferences for various male traits change throughout the menstrual cycle.^[47] Hormonal fluctuation across the menstrual cycle explains temporal variation in women's judgment of the attractiveness of members of the opposite sex. This is due to the psychological processes that shape the formation and maintenance of human romantic relationships, which are influenced by variation in hormonal levels.^[48]

The menstrual cycle highlighting the most fertile period, and the follicular and luteal phase

Due to their high hormone content, oral contraceptives have the potential to alter women's partner preference for a range of male traits, which could have important consequences on sexual relationships, as it alters women's attraction to their partner and, potentially, to other men.^[47] If a woman's use of oral contraceptives is congruent, meaning she was using oral contraceptives when she met her partner, her current preference will more closely match the preference that shaped her partner choice in the first place, and the desire is higher than that of a woman whose use of oral contraceptives is incongruent.^[47] The resulting factor is that women's partner preferences are influenced by oral contraceptives use, meaning that attraction towards an existing partner changes over time if a woman initiates or discontinues oral contraceptive use.^[47]

Studies have shown that men are more attracted to women when they are more fertile and/or on their menstrual cycle. Women gave samples of when they were fertile and less fertile. The men in the study would smell and choose which sample between the two they were more attracted to. Women give off a more favorable smell the more fertile they are; in other words, men notice this and choose the more fertile sample rather than the less fertile sample.^[49]

Body odour as a cue for ovulation

It has been hypothesized that changes in body odour during the menstrual cycle may provide cues to males about the fertility of females. However, evidence for the ability of males to detect these signals is poor. One study found that the odour of shirts worn by females in follicular phase were considered more pleasant by males than the odour of the same females during luteal phase.^[4] Meanwhile a similar study of slightly larger sample size failed to find a significant difference between males' ratings of ovulating and non-ovulating females' odours.^[50] Another study found a significant difference in males' salivary testosterone levels after smelling the shirts of ovulating versus non-ovulating females.^[51]

Body odour and fluctuating asymmetry

Fluctuating Asymmetry (FA) is a type of biological asymmetry, referring to the extent to which small random deviations occur from expected perfect symmetry in different populations of organisms.^[52] In humans, for example, FA can be demonstrated through the unequal sizes of bilateral features such as the eyes, ears and breasts. FA acts as an index for measuring developmental instability as it provides a clear indicator of the possible environmental and genetic stressors affecting development.^[53] It is thought that having a preference for a symmetrical face offers some adaptive value as such symmetry may signal an individual's ability to cope with environmental challenges.^[54] FA shares an inverse relationship with certain desired traits; a low FA is correlated with higher stress tolerance, larger body size in males, smaller body size in females, and higher facial attractiveness.^[55] FA is detectable through the olfactory senses and it has a measurable effect on sexual attraction.^[40] Significant cues may be found through body odour relating to a potential mate's health, reproductive status and genetic quality and FA is one such cue as it is considered to be a marker of genetic and developmental stability.^[56]

During their fertile phase, females have repeatedly been shown as being more attracted to the body odours of more symmetrical males^[57] and of males whose faces they rate as attractive.^[58] The scent of symmetrical males provides an honest indicator of the male's phenotypic and genetic quality.^[57] This may explain why women who are highly fertile find the scent of low FA as attractive and yet this scent is not necessarily as attractive to other women.^[40] For example, it has been found that normally cycling women near their peak fertility tended to prefer the odour of shirts worn by symmetrical men and yet women at low fertility in their menstrual cycle or those using the contraceptive pill showed no preference for the odour of shirts of symmetrical men compared to those of asymmetrical men.^[59] These findings support the good genes hypothesis such that when women are in the fertile phase of their menstrual cycle, they should prefer markers of genetic benefits or 'good genes'.^[39] In other words, fertile women who prefer the scent of men with low FA are demonstrating a preference for the genetic benefits associated with those symmetric men.

It is widely accepted that men prefer the scent of women in her most fertile period. For example, in one study, men rated the body odours of T-shirts worn by women during their most fertile phase as more sexy and pleasant than T-shirts worn during their least fertile phase.^[4] Despite this, much of the research in the area concludes that the effect of the scent of symmetry appears to be sex specific such that men do not find the scent of symmetrical women more attractive than the scent of asymmetrical women.^[40][57] It therefore appears that attraction to symmetric body odour of the opposite sex appears to apply exclusively to women, and specifically fertile women, as non-fertile women and men do not display this preference.

Body odour in selection

Sex differences

The oral hormone contraceptive pill

Whilst a vast number of studies have been conducted to investigate body odour and mating, research is now shifting in particular towards the effect of male scent to female sexual attraction. This is largely due to the effects of the menstrual cycle and hormone contraceptives, which directly affect women's partner preference. Past research has highlighted the importance of a male's scent to females, such that smell was rated significantly more important for women than men. Furthermore, smell and body odour were rated as the most important physical factor for females, compared to looks for males.^[60] Further studies have aimed to understand these sex differences. Using questionnaires and self-report data, a greater reliance was found for females on olfactory cues than males. This reliance was valued for females in both sexual and non-sexual contexts.^[61] The research strongly supports the hypothesis that whilst men use more physical and visual cues, women rely more heavily on olfactory cues such as body odour that men tend to overlook.

Body odour enhancement

It has been established that women tend to rely more heavily on olfactory cues than males, rating those with pleasant body odour as more attractive than those with less pleasant body odour. Moreover, body odour and sexual attraction can be enhanced using artificial fragrances and dietary habits. Whilst males are influenced by body odour during selection, past research has demonstrated a significantly greater reliance on such cues by females.

A dependence on such olfactory cues has led to the enhancement of male body odour to influence female attraction. Past research has shown that men using fragranced antiperspirants in videos were rated as more attractive by women than those in a placebo control condition. In addition to this, females gave higher ratings of masculinity than males, particularly in the fragranced condition.^[61] This provides evidence that females are more attentive to olfactory cues during partner selection. Aside from artificial fragrances, researchers have also begun to focus on more natural odour enhancements such as diet quality. A recent study aimed to investigate whether a dietary fruit and vegetable intake would influence female mate preferences. Its results showed that subjects rated as most pleasant smelling were those with a higher fruit and vegetable intake, suggesting male body odour can be enhanced by diet to appeal to females.^[62]

Both sexes commonly use artificial scents to enhance their perceived sexual appeal. Many of these (musk compounds) share a similar chemical profile with naturally produced body chemicals.^[63] Research has found a significant correlation between an individual's MHC genotype and the ratings they assigned to certain perfumes labelled to use "for self".^[63] This therefore supports the hypothesis that perfumes can personally enhance body odours that indicate an individual's immunogenetics.

In animals

Insects

Insects use extremely sensitive receptors to detect pheromone signals. Each pheromone signal can elicit a distinct response based on the gender and social status of the recipient.^[64] In insects, sex pheromones can be detected in very minute concentrations in the environment. Insect sex pheromones, usually released by the female to lure a male, are vital in the process by which insects locate each other for mating.^[64] The main purpose of releasing these sex pheromones is to attract a partner from a distance, however the sex pheromones also serve to evoke a courtship response and sexually excite the male prior to copulation.^[65] Male insects can also release sex pheromones, but this is only for the purpose of sexually exciting the female, making her more receptive to the male's advances. Generally, the majority of insects are sensitive and selective to the sex pheromone of their own species.

Insects make use of two classes of pheromone signals; the pheromones that induce immediate or releaser effects (for example, aggression or mating behaviours) and those that elicit long-lasting or ‘primer' effects, such as physiological and hormonal changes.^[64]

A pair of mosquitos during mating season

There is a significant amount of research supporting body odour and sexual attraction in insects. Observations and laboratory experiments identified a chemical substance involved in the mating behavior of Culiseta inornata; when exposed to this scent the male mosquitoes were found to attempt sex with dead females and when exposed to the scent of virgin females, the males showed increased sexual activity through excited flight, searching and attempts to copulate with other males.^[66] Further evidence comes from research on the commercial silkworm moth, Bombyx mori. A chemical produced in the abdominal sac of the female adult moth is released shortly after its emergence from the cocoon; male moths were found to be immediately attracted to this scent, demonstrated by a characteristic wing flutter and attempts to copulate.^[67] The sex pheromones of the silkworm moths can elicit responses in the male antenna at concentrations of only a few hundred molecules per square centimeter.^[68]

Vertebrates

For vertebrates, aquatic environments are an ideal medium for dispersing chemical signals over large areas. Aquatic vertebrates use chemical signals for a wide range of purposes, from attracting mates to distant nesting sites during spawning, to signalling reproductive readiness and regulating predator/prey interactions.^[64] Research on goldfish has identified that the fish release hormones in various combinations, depending on the reproductive status of the releaser, and these different combinations can elicit varying degrees of male courtship in the recipient.^[69]

In terrestrial environments, chemosignals can be either volatile or non-volatile.^[64] Accordingly, terrestrial vertebrates have two functionally and anatomically distinct olfactory systems: the main olfactory system, which is receptive to volatile cues, and the vomeronasal system, which is thought to process mostly non-volatile pheromones.^[70]

Mammals

A bull elk attracts females by urinating on himself during the rut.^[71]

Female wolves are attracted to the urine and preputial gland secretions of males during the breeding season.^[72]

Male wolves are attracted to the urine of females in estrus.^[72]

When it comes to sex, mammals use chemical signals (pheromones) to convey information to one another. Mammal's pheromones are air-borne chemical substances released in the urine or feces of animals or secreted from sweat glands that are perceived by the olfactory system and that elicit both behavioral and endocrine responses in conspecifics.^[73] Mammals use sex pheromones to arouse, attract, and elicit specific behavioral responses from the opposite sex.^[74] In mammals, chemical signals and the scent glands that secrete them have many features in common, for example, expression in only one sex, development only in adults, often only secreted in breeding season and used exclusively in mating.^[75] For an odour to stimulate sexual behavior exclusively, it must not only be perceived and preferred, but when absent there should be a decrease or complete elimination of sexual activity. This exclusivity has only been shown in golden hamsters^[76] and the rhesus monkey.^[77]

Mammalian pheromones can elicit both long-lasting effects that alter the hormone levels of the recipient animal, and short-term effects on its behavior.^[78] For example, detection of male pheromones by female mice has been found to encourage onset of puberty, however the detection of female pheromones have been found to delay the onset of puberty.^[79]

Odour can influence mammalian mating both directly and indirectly. Odour may act as a direct benefit to females, for example by avoiding contagious diseases by using odour cues to choose a healthy mate.^[75] Odour can also act as an indicator mechanism, a form of indirect benefit, for example when a male displays a particular trait such as strength of odour which is in proportion to their heritable viability, females choosing males with strong odours will gain genes for high viability to pass to their offspring.^[80]

There is vast evidence for the use of pheromones in mating behaviors. For example, when boars become sexually aroused, they salivate profusely dispersing pheromones into the air. These pheromones attract receptive sows, causing it to adopt a specific mating posture, known as standing, which allows the male boar to mount it and therefore copulate.^[81]

Species specificity

Regardless of the species, sex pheromones are often structurally similar and for that reason different species need to be able to respond to the correct pheromone. It is the variation in the ratios of each compound within a pheromone that yields species specificity.^[82] The use of mixtures of compounds as pheromones is well documented in insects, research into male orchid bees demonstrates that specific odours mediate exclusive attraction within a species.^[83]

See also

• Fluctuating asymmetry
• Major histocompatibility complex and sexual selection
• Pheromone § Humans
• Sexual attraction
• Sexual motivation and hormones
• Ovulatory shift hypothesis
• Socks
• Foot odour
• Body odour
• Foot fetishism

References

1. "Know sweat: scientists solve mystery behind body odour". the Guardian. 2020-07-27. Retrieved 2022-04-15.
2. Michael, Stoddart, D. Michael (David) (1976-01-01). Mammalian odours and pheromones. Edward Arnold.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
3. Spehr, Marc; Kelliher, Kevin R.; Li, Xiao-Hong; Boehm, Thomas; Leinders-Zufall, Trese; Zufall, Frank (2006-02-15). "Essential Role of the Main Olfactory System in Social Recognition of Major Histocompatibility Complex Peptide Ligands". Journal of Neuroscience. 26 (7): 1961–1970. doi:10.1523/jneurosci.4939-05.2006. PMC 6674934. PMID 16481428.
4. Singh, D.; Bronstad, P.M. (22 April 2001). "Female body odour is a potential cue to ovulation". Proceedings of the Royal Society B. 268 (1469): 797–801. doi:10.1098/rspb.2001.1589. PMC 1088671. PMID 11345323.
5. "What Your Body Odor Says About You". Time. Retrieved 2022-04-15.
6. Havlicek, Jan; Roberts, S. Craig; Flegr, Jaroslav (2005). "Women's preference for dominant male odour: effects of menstrual cycle and relationship status". Biology Letters. 1 (3): 256–259. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2005.0332. PMC 1617143. PMID 17148181.
7. Watson, Stephanie (2021-09-15). "What's that smell? Get rid of body odor". Harvard Health. Retrieved 2022-04-15.
8. Grammer, Karl; Fink, Bernhard; Neave, Nick (February 2005). "Human pheromones and sexual attraction". European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology. 118 (2): 135–142. doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2004.08.010. PMID 15653193.
9. Herz, Rachel S.; Inzlicht, Michael (September 2002). "Sex differences in response to physical and social factors involved in human mate selection". Evolution and Human Behavior. 23 (5): 359–364. doi:10.1016/S1090-5138(02)00095-8.
10. Nak-Eon Choi; Jung H. Han (23 February 2015). How Flavor Works: The Science of Taste and Aroma. John Wiley & Sons. p. 155. ISBN 978-1-118-86547-7.
11. Brian R. Eggins (26 April 2002). Chemical Sensors and Biosensors. John Wiley & Sons. p. 3. ISBN 978-0-471-89914-3.
12. Wysocki, Charles J.; Preti, George (7 October 2004). "Facts, fallacies, fears, and frustrations with human pheromones". The Anatomical Record. 281A (1): 1201–1211. doi:10.1002/ar.a.20125. PMID 15470677. It is emphasized that no bioassay-guided study has led to the isolation of true human pheromones, a step that will elucidate specific functions to human chemical signals.
13. Riley, Alex (9 May 2016). "Pheromones are probably not why people find you attractive". BBC News. Retrieved 2016-05-09.
14. Grammer, Karl; Fink, Bernhard; Neave, Nick (2005). "Human pheromones and sexual attraction". European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology. 118 (2): 135–142. doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2004.08.010. PMID 15653193.
15. Hays, Warren S. T. (2003). "Human pheromones: have they been demonstrated?". Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. 54 (2): 89–97. Bibcode:2003BEcoS..54...89H. doi:10.1007/s00265-003-0613-4. JSTOR 25063239. S2CID 37400635.
16. Mostafa, Taymour; Khouly, Ghada El; Hassan, Ashraf (2012). "Pheromones in sex and reproduction: Do they have a role in humans?". Journal of Advanced Research. 3 (1): 1–9. doi:10.1016/j.jare.2011.03.003.
17. Kirk-Smith, Michael (1978). "Human social attitudes affected by androstenol". Research Communications in Psychology, Psychiatry & Behavior. 3 (4): 379–384. ISSN 0362-2428.
18. McClintock, M.K. (January 1971). "Menstrual synchrony and suppression". Nature. 229 (5282): 244–5. Bibcode:1971Natur.229..244M. doi:10.1038/229244a0. PMID 4994256. S2CID 4267390.
19. Stern, K., McClintock. M.K. (March 1998). "Regulation of ovulation by human pheromones". Nature. 392 (6672): 177–9. Bibcode:1998Natur.392..177S. doi:10.1038/32408. PMID 9515961. S2CID 4426700.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link).
20. Yang, Zhengwei; Schank, Jeffrey C. (2006). "Women Do Not Synchronize Their Menstrual Cycles". Human Nature. 17 (4): 434–447. doi:10.1007/s12110-006-1005-z. PMID 26181612. S2CID 2316864. Retrieved 2007-06-25.
21. Strassmann BI (March 1999). "Menstrual synchrony pheromones: cause for doubt". Hum. Reprod. 14 (3): 579–80. doi:10.1093/humrep/14.3.579. PMID 10221677.
22. Harris, Amy L.; Vitzthum, Virginia J. (2013-04-01). "Darwin's Legacy: An Evolutionary View of Women's Reproductive and Sexual Functioning". The Journal of Sex Research. 50 (3–4): 207–246. doi:10.1080/00224499.2012.763085. ISSN 0022-4499. PMID 23480070. S2CID 30229421.
23. Toller, C. Van; Kirk-Smith, M.; Wood, N.; Lombard, J.; Dodd, G.H. (1983). "Skin conductance and subjective assessments associated with the odour of 5-α-androstand-3-one". Biological Psychology. 16 (1–2): 85–107. doi:10.1016/0301-0511(83)90056-X. PMID 6682682. S2CID 54325922.
24. Stromberg, Joseph (13 March 2015). "How one perfume company misled scientists into believing in human sex pheromones". Vox. Retrieved 23 July 2015. ... But the basic truth is that we have no evidence human pheromones even exist — and these studies can all be traced back to a single fragrance company called Erox that managed to convince dozens of scientists their two 'pheromones' were worth researching in the first place.
25. Raphaëlle, C; Cao, C; Donnelly, P (2008). "Is Mate Choice in Humans MHC-Dependent?". PLOS Genet. 4 (9): e1000184. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000184. PMC 2519788. PMID 18787687.
26. Sandro Carvalho Santos, Pablo; Augusto Schinemann, Juliano; Gabardo, Juarez; da Graça Bicalho, Maria (2005-04-01). "New evidence that the MHC influences odor perception in humans: a study with 58 Southern Brazilian students". Hormones and Behavior. 47 (4): 384–388. doi:10.1016/j.yhbeh.2004.11.005. PMID 15777804. S2CID 8568275.
27. Breedlove, Marc; Watson, Neil (2013). Biological Psychology (Seventh Edition). Sunderland, Massachusetts: Sinauer Associates. p. 372. ISBN 978-0-87893-927-5.
28. Janeway, Charles A; Travers, Paul; Walport, Mark; Shlomchik, Mark J (2001). Immunobiology (5 ed.). New York: Garland Science. pp. The major histocompatibility complex and its functions. ISBN 978-0-8153-3642-6.
29. Penn, Dustin; Potts, Wayne (1999). "The Evolution of Mating Preferences and Major Histocompatibility Complex Genes". The American Naturalist. 154 (2): 145–164. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.616.9744. doi:10.1086/303166. JSTOR 101086/303166. PMID 29578757. S2CID 4398891.
30. Wedekind, Claus; Seebeck, Thomas; Bettens Florence; Paepke, Alexander J. (22 June 1995). "MHC-Dependent Mate Preferences in Humans". Proceedings of the Royal Society B. 260 (1359): 245–249. Bibcode:1995RSPSB.260..245W. doi:10.1098/rspb.1995.0087. PMID 7630893. S2CID 34971350.
31. Manning, J; Koukourakis, K; Brodie, D (1997). "Fluctuating asymmetry, metabolic rate and sexual selection in human males". Evolution and Human Biology. 18 (1): 15–21. Bibcode:1997EHumB..18...15M. doi:10.1016/s1090-5138(96)00072-4.
32. Potts, W; Manning, J; Wakeland, E; Hughes, A (1994). "The Role of Infectious Disease, Inbreeding and Mating Preferences in Maintaining MHC Genetic Diversity: An Experimental Test". Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences. 346 (1317): 369–378. doi:10.1098/rstb.1994.0154. PMID 7708831.
33. Brown, Jerram L.; Eklund, Amy (1994-01-01). "Kin Recognition and the Major Histocompatibility Complex: An Integrative Review". The American Naturalist. 143 (3): 435–461. doi:10.1086/285612. JSTOR 2462739. S2CID 84628251.
34. Ober, Carole; Weitkamp, Lowell R.; Cox, Nancy; Dytch, Harvey; Kostyu, Donna; Elias, Sherman (1997-09-01). "HLA and Mate Choice in Humans". The American Journal of Human Genetics. 61 (3): 497–504. doi:10.1086/515511. PMC 1715964. PMID 9326314.
35. Laitinen, Tarja (1993). "A Set of MHC Haplotypes Found Among Finnish Couples Suffering From Recurrent Spontaneous Abortions". American Journal of Reproductive Immunology. 29 (3): 148–154. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0897.1993.tb00580.x. PMID 8373523. S2CID 32058630.
36. Ehlers, Anke; Beck, Stephan; Forbes, Simon A.; Trowsdale, John; Volz, Armin; Younger, Ruth; Ziegler, Andreas (2000-12-01). "MHC-Linked Olfactory Receptor Loci Exhibit Polymorphism and Contribute to Extended HLA/OR-Haplotypes". Genome Research. 10 (12): 1968–1978. doi:10.1101/gr.10.12.1968. PMC 313068. PMID 11116091.
37. Eklund, Amy C; Belchak, Mary Margaret; Lapidos, Karen; Raha-Chowdhury, Ruma; Ober, Carole (2000-07-01). "Polymorphisms in the HLA-linked olfactory receptor genes in the Hutterites". Human Immunology. 61 (7): 711–717. doi:10.1016/S0198-8859(00)00132-4. PMID 10880742.
38. Santos, PS; Schinemann, JA; Gabardo, J; da Graça Bicalho, M (2005). "New evidence that the MHC influences odor perception in humans: a study with 58 Southern Brazilian students". Hormones and Behavior. 47 (4): 384–388. doi:10.1016/j.yhbeh.2004.11.005. PMID 15777804. S2CID 8568275.
39. Gangestad, S.W; Garver-Apgar, C.E; Simpson, J.A; Cousins, A.J (2007). "Changes in women's mate preferences across the ovulatory cycle". Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 92 (1): 151–163. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.495.1474. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.92.1.151. PMID 17201549.
40. Thornhill, R. (1 September 2003). "Major histocompatibility complex genes, symmetry, and body scent attractiveness in men and women". Behavioral Ecology. 14 (5): 668–678. doi:10.1093/beheco/arg043.
41. Hirsch, A; Gruss, J (1999). "Human Male Sexual Response to Olfactory Stimuli". American Academy of Neurological and Orthopaedic Surgeons. 19: 14–19.
42. Jennings-White, C (1995). "Perfumery and the sixth sense". Perfumer and Flavorist. 20: 1.
43. Savic, Ivanka; Berglund, Hans; Gulyas, Balazs; Roland, Per (August 2001). "Smelling of Odorous Sex Hormone-like Compounds Causes Sex-Differentiated Hypothalamic Activations in Humans". Neuron. 31 (4): 661–668. doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(01)00390-7. PMID 11545724.
44. Monti-Bloch, L.; Grosser, B.I. (October 1991). "Effect of putative pheromones on the electrical activity of the human vomeronasal organ and olfactory epithelium". The Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. 39 (4): 573–582. doi:10.1016/0960-0760(91)90255-4. PMID 1892788. S2CID 46330425.
45. Cornwell, R. Elisabeth; Boothroyd, Lynda; Burt, D. Michael; Feinberg, David R.; Jones, Ben C.; Little, Anthony C.; Pitman, Robert; Whiten, Susie; Perrett, David I. (2004-03-22). "Concordant preferences for opposite–sex signals? Human pheromones and facial characteristics". Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences. 271 (1539): 635–640. doi:10.1098/rspb.2003.2649. PMC 1691642. PMID 15156922.
46. Miller, Saul L.; Maner, Jon K. (2011). "Ovulation as a male mating prime: Subtle signs of women's fertility influence men's mating cognition and behavior". Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 100 (2): 295–308. doi:10.1037/a0020930. PMID 20822287.
47. Roberts, S. Craig; Cobey, Kelly D.; Klapilová, Kateřina; Havlíček, Jan (2013-06-04). "An Evolutionary Approach Offers a Fresh Perspective on the Relationship Between Oral Contraception and Sexual Desire". Archives of Sexual Behavior. 42 (8): 1369–1375. doi:10.1007/s10508-013-0126-9. hdl:1893/18462. PMID 23733157. S2CID 6973577.
48. Roberts, S. Craig; Little, Anthony C.; Burriss, Robert P.; Cobey, Kelly D.; Klapilová, Kateřina; Havlíček, Jan; Jones, Benedict C.; DeBruine, Lisa; Petrie, Marion (2014-07-01). "Partner Choice, Relationship Satisfaction, and Oral Contraception The Congruency Hypothesis" (PDF). Psychological Science. 25 (7): 1497–1503. doi:10.1177/0956797614532295. hdl:1893/23163. PMID 24818612. S2CID 5781374.
49. Gildersleeve, Kelly A.; Haselton, Martie G.; Larson, Christina M.; Pillsworth, Elizabeth G. (February 2012). "Body odor attractiveness as a cue of impending ovulation in women: Evidence from a study using hormone-confirmed ovulation". Hormones and Behavior. 61 (2): 157–166. doi:10.1016/j.yhbeh.2011.11.005. PMID 22137971. S2CID 6877627.
50. Mei, Mei; Grillot, Rachel L.; Abbey, Craig K; Thompson, Melissa E; Roney, James R (2022-03-09). "Does scent attractiveness reveal women's ovulatory timing? Evidence from signal detection analyses and endocrine predictors of odour attractiveness". Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 289 (1970). doi:10.1098/rspb.2022.0026. PMC 8905178. PMID 35259990.
51. Miller, Saul L.; Maner, Jon K. (2010-02-01). "Scent of a Woman Men's Testosterone Responses to Olfactory Ovulation Cues". Psychological Science. 21 (2): 276–283. doi:10.1177/0956797609357733. PMID 20424057. S2CID 18170407.
52. Tomkins, Joseph L; Kotiaho, Janne S (2002). Fluctuating asymmetry. doi:10.1038/npg.els.0003741. ISBN 978-0470016176. {{cite book}}: |journal= ignored (help)
53. Møller, A.P.; Pomiankowski, A (1993). "Fluctuating asymmetry and sexual selection". Personality and Individual Differences. 89 (1–3): 267–279. doi:10.1007/BF02424520. S2CID 40071460.
54. Fink, B.; Neave, N.; Manning, J.T.; Grammer, K (2006). "Facial symmetry and judgements of attractiveness, health and personality". Personality and Individual Differences. 41 (3): 491–499. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2006.01.017.
55. Manning, J.T.; Koukourakis, K.; Brodie, D.A. (1997). "Fluctuating asymmetry, metabolic rate and sexual selection in human males". Evolution and Human Biology. 18 (1): 15–21. Bibcode:1997EHumB..18...15M. doi:10.1016/S1090-5138(96)00072-4.
56. Havlicek, Jan; Roberts, S. Crag; Flegr, Jaroslav (2005). "Women's preference for dominant male odour: effects of menstrual cycle and relationship status". Biology Letters. 1 (3): 256–259. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2005.0332. PMC 1617143. PMID 17148181.
57. Thornhill, Randy; Gangestad, Steven W. (1999). "The scent of symmetry: A human sex pheromone that signals fitness?". Evolution and Human Behavior. 20 (3): 175–201. Bibcode:1999EHumB..20..175T. doi:10.1016/S1090-5138(99)00005-7.
58. Rikowski, Anya; Grammer, Karl (1999). "Human body odour, symmetry and attractiveness". Proceedings of the Royal Society B. 266 (1422): 869–874. doi:10.1098/rspb.1999.0717. PMC 1689917. PMID 10380676.
59. Gangestad, Steven W.; Thornhill, Randy (1998-05-22). "Menstrual cycle variation in women's preferences for the scent of symmetrical men". Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences. 265 (1399): 927–933. doi:10.1098/rspb.1998.0380. PMC 1689051. PMID 9633114.
60. Herz, Rachel S.; Inzlicht, Michael (2002). "Sex differences in response to physical and social factors involved in human mate selection". Evolution and Human Behavior. 23 (5): 359–364. doi:10.1016/s1090-5138(02)00095-8.
61. Allen, Caroline; Cobey, Kelly D.; Havlíček, Jan; Roberts, S. Craig (2016). "The impact of artificial fragrances on the assessment of mate quality cues in body odor". Evolution and Human Behavior. 37 (6): 481–489. Bibcode:2016EHumB..37..481A. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2016.05.001. hdl:1893/23162.
62. Zuniga, Andrea; Stevenson, Richard J.; Mahmut, Mehmut K.; Stephen, Ian D. (2017). "Diet quality and the attractiveness of male body odor". Evolution and Human Behavior. 38 (1): 136–143. Bibcode:2017EHumB..38..136Z. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2016.08.002.
63. Milinski, Manfred; Wedekind, Claus (2001-03-01). "Evidence for MHC-correlated perfume preferences in humans". Behavioral Ecology. 12 (2): 140–149. doi:10.1093/beheco/12.2.140.
64. Dulac, Catherine; Torello, A. Thomas (July 2003). "Sensory systems: Molecular detection of pheromone signals in mammals: from genes to behaviour". Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 4 (7): 551–562. doi:10.1038/nrn1140. PMID 12838330. S2CID 11120696.
65. Jacobson, Martin (1972). Insect Sex Pheromones. New York: Academic Press. p. 1.
66. Kliewer, J. W.; Miura, T.; Husbands, R. C.; Hurst, C. H. (1 May 1966). "Sex Pheromones and Mating Behavior of Culiseta inornata (Diptera: Culicidae)". Annals of the Entomological Society of America. 59 (3): 530–533. doi:10.1093/aesa/59.3.530.
67. Butenandt, A; Beckmann, R; Stamm, D (1961). "Über den Sexuallockstoff des Seidenspinners, II. Konstitution und Konfiguration des Bombykols". Hoppe-Seyler's Zeitschrift für Physiologische Chemie. 324: 84–87. doi:10.1515/bchm2.1961.324.1.84. PMID 13689418.
68. Wilson, Edward O. (1963). "Pheromones". Scientific American. 208 (5): 100–114. Bibcode:1963SciAm.208e.100W. doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0563-100.
69. Poling, Kirsten R.; Fraser, E. Jane; Sorensen, Peter W. (2001-06-01). "The three steroidal components of the goldfish preovulatory pheromone signal evoke different behaviors in males". Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology B. 4TH International Symposium on Fish Endocrinology. 129 (2–3): 645–651. doi:10.1016/S1096-4959(01)00361-X. PMID 11399501.
70. Broman, Prof Dr Ivar (1920-01-01). "Das Organon vomero-nasale Jacobsoni — ein Wassergeruchsorgan!". Anatomische Hefte (in German). 58 (1): 137–191. doi:10.1007/BF02033831. S2CID 20711854.
71. Bowyer, R. Terry; Kitchen, David W. (May 1987). "Significance of Scent-marking in Roosevelt Elk". Journal of Mammalogy. 68 (2): 418–423. doi:10.2307/1381489. JSTOR 1381489. Archived (PDF) from the original on 16 January 2021. Retrieved 17 January 2019.
72. Mech, L. David; Boitani, Luigi, eds. (2003). Wolves: Behaviour, Ecology and Conservation. University of Chicago Press. ISBN 0-226-51696-2.
73. Rekwot, P.I.; Ogwu, D.; Oyedipe, E.O.; Sekoni, V.O. (March 2001). "The role of pheromones and biostimulation in animal reproduction". Animal Reproduction Science. 65 (3–4): 157–170. doi:10.1016/s0378-4320(00)00223-2. PMID 11267796.
74. The Neurobiology of Olfaction. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press/Taylor & Francis. 2009.
75. Wyatt, Tristram D. (2003). Pheromones and animal behaviour : communication by smell and taste (Repr. with corrections 2004. ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 9780521485265.
76. Murphy, M. R.; Schneider, G. E. (16 January 1970). "Olfactory Bulb Removal Eliminates Mating Behavior in the Male Golden Hamster". Science. 167 (3916): 302–304. Bibcode:1970Sci...167..302M. doi:10.1126/science.167.3916.302. PMID 5409714. S2CID 39542004.
77. Michael, R. P.; Keverne, E. B.; Bonsall, R. W. (28 May 1971). "Pheromones: Isolation of Male Sex Attractants from a Female Primate". Science. 172 (3986): 964–966. Bibcode:1971Sci...172..964M. doi:10.1126/science.172.3986.964. PMID 4995585. S2CID 42252958.
78. Halpern, M (March 1987). "The Organization and Function of the Vomeronasal System". Annual Review of Neuroscience. 10 (1): 325–362. doi:10.1146/annurev.ne.10.030187.001545. PMID 3032065.
79. Halpern, M. (1987-01-01). "The Organization and Function of the Vomeronasal System". Annual Review of Neuroscience. 10 (1): 325–362. doi:10.1146/annurev.ne.10.030187.001545. PMID 3032065.
80. Andersson, Malte (1994). Sexual selection. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press. ISBN 9780691000572.
81. Dorries, Kathleen M.; Adkins-Regan, Elizabeth; Halpern, Bruce P. (1997). "Sensitivity and Behavioral Responses to the Pheromone Androstenone Are Not Mediated by the Vomeronasal Organ in Domestic Pigs". Brain, Behavior and Evolution. 49 (1): 53–62. doi:10.1159/000112981. PMID 8980852.
82. Dobele, Angela; Lindgreen, Adam; Beverland, Michael; Vanhamme, Joëlle; van Wijk, Robert (2007-07-01). "Why pass on viral messages? Because they connect emotionally" (PDF). Business Horizons. 50 (4): 291–304. doi:10.1016/j.bushor.2007.01.004.
83. Zimmermann, Yvonne; Roubik, David W.; Eltz, Thomas (19 July 2006). "Species-specific attraction to pheromonal analogues in orchid bees". Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. 60 (6): 833–843. Bibcode:2006BEcoS..60..833Z. doi:10.1007/s00265-006-0227-8. S2CID 20819411.