Zobrest v. Catalina Foothills School District
1993 United States Supreme Court case / From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Dear Wikiwand AI, let's keep it short by simply answering these key questions:
Can you list the top facts and stats about Zobrest v. Catalina Foothills School District?
Summarize this article for a 10 year old
SHOW ALL QUESTIONS
Zobrest v. Catalina Foothills School District, 509 U.S. 1 (1993), was a case before the United States Supreme Court.
Quick Facts Zobrest v. Catalina Foothills School District, Argued February 24, 1993 Decided June 18, 1993 ...
Zobrest v. Catalina Foothills School District | |
---|---|
Argued February 24, 1993 Decided June 18, 1993 | |
Full case name | Zobrest et al. v. Catalina Foothills School District |
Docket no. | 92-94 |
Citations | 509 U.S. 1 (more) 113 S. Ct. 2462; 125 L. Ed. 2d 1 |
Case history | |
Prior | 963 F.2d 1190 (9th Cir. 1989) |
Holding | |
A school must continue to provide an interpreter under the Individuals with Disabilities Act even if the child elects to attend a religious school, in so which it does not violate the Establishment Clause. | |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinions | |
Majority | Rehnquist, joined by White, Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas |
Dissent | Blackmun, joined by Souter (in full); Stevens, O'Connor (Part I) |
Dissent | O'Connor, joined by Stevens |
Laws applied | |
U.S. Const. amend. I; Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq. |
Close