Voyeur Dorm, L.C. v. City of Tampa
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Voyeur Dorm, L.C. v. City of Tampa, 265 F.3d 1232 (11th Cir. 2001),[1] was a case decided by the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals, in which the court decided whether an adult-oriented website called Voyeur Dorm could be defined as "adult entertainment establishment" under the city's zoning codes. The circuit court was unanimous in its decision that the zoning codes did not apply to an online-only business.
Quick Facts Voyeur Dorm, L.C. v. City of Tampa, Court ...
Voyeur Dorm, L.C. v. City of Tampa | |
---|---|
![]() | |
Court | United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit |
Full case name | Voyeur Dorm, L.C., et al v. City of Tampa, FL |
Decided | September 21, 2001 |
Citation | 265 F.3d 1232 |
Case history | |
Prior history | 121 F. Supp. 2d 1373 (M.D. Fla. 2000) |
Court membership | |
Judges sitting | Gerald Bard Tjoflat, Joel Fredrick Dubina, John M. Duhe, Jr. |
Case opinions | |
Majority | Dubina, joined by a unanimous court |
Laws applied | |
Tampa City Code |
Close