Loading AI tools
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions about User:WarthogDemon. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | → | Archive 10 |
Re your message: Thanks! Speaking of thanks, when I hit 10,000 edits, I told myself that I would leave a note to the various people I've run into on Wikipedia that have made an impact on my time here. Just wanted to say thanks. You're doing a great job RC patrolling. =) If there is anything else I can help you with, feel free to ask. -- Gogo Dodo 00:48, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
C'mon man. You know we get tons of articles from people trying to promote websites, thus we are very sensitive to spam. Read WP:WEB and if you really think that flights.com meets the notability requirements, message me. Herostratus 04:55, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
Ok, I did not want to attack you, as long as you are not administrator but even if you are, you guys need to think twice before accusing somebody they are posting spam here or anything like that...( i had many problems with administrators in the past, you have no idea), that's better, but yea, i think that link i added has merits, lets vote on it, if not, i will put something else instead, sounds fair? Leave a message on that talk page and see how people reply, let's see if majority agrees, if not i will give you some links you think are appropriate, more than happy to talk about it. I will return, no later than monday. I do think, some video is good. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 64.107.220.170 (talk • contribs) .
Thanks for reverting that odd comment on my Talk page. And to answer your other question, I don't count Talk page weird comments or vandalism on my counter. However, I did forget to increment it earlier, so your count is correct. =) -- Gogo Dodo 00:52, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
![]() |
The Original Barnstar | |
For your very high amount of edits (especially for only being here a little over a month), and your countless reverts of vandalism! —The Great Llamamoo? 01:26, 23 November 2006 (UTC) |
hey thanks for the warning...didnt mean to be rude...tc...(Lashonda 02:42, 23 November 2006 (UTC))
Dropping off a nice cup of tea to say I saw you out hard at work; you are doing a great job and it is greatly appreciated. Keep up the good work, and if I can be of any help to you, please let me know. Essjay (Talk) 06:49, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
You may indeed ask. This page went through an Articles for Deletion discussion, from which the decision to redirect the title to Innocence, a wholly different subject, was reached. The number of pages which link to an article is no measure of its noteworthiness; that must come from outside sources. Please see Wikipedia:Notability (music) for the criteria which determine if a band is noteworthy or not. Thanks for your comment. Denni talk 02:18, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
What did you mean by this edit? Why are you accusing me of vandalizing a user page? What user page? I left a warning on an IP vandal's talk page, the same vandal who is now posting personal attacks against me (1 and ) You reverted the IP comments reverted. But the vandal warning under my name is still on their talk page. What on earth is going on? --Kathryn NicDhàna ♫♦♫ 07:03, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for your note. I know what you mean about the name, but if you hadn't have typed it, it wouldn't have got the quick response it did. Keep up the good work. Bucketsofg 22:57, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
WTF did I do wrong on Justin Duchscherer's page —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Serlmano (talk • contribs) .
Why did you list Pavelushakov for blocking at Administrator intervention against vandalism? The article on his talk page was just to "prove" that he wasn't spamming. He wasn't trying to spam on his talk page as well. --wj32 talk | contribs 05:51, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
Thanks again for looking after my user page. =) -- Gogo Dodo 21:57, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
Re your message: It's certainly uncivil. I think he's leaning towards being reported. -- Gogo Dodo 22:50, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
Hi there. I just wanted to say that I believe Gogo is being overly modest about his contributions on Wikipedia. I mean...if he is only a vandal-fighter, than how can he possibly have 100+ edits to multiple articles? Surely, he must be an article-builder as well. Here's the 10 most frequently pages edited by Gogo:
315 List of experiments from Lilo & Stitch 121 Survivor: Cook Islands 46 Survivor: Panama 37 List of Dirty Jobs episodes 30 University of California, Irvine 29 List of The Unit episodes 26 SpongeBob SquarePants 20 SpongeBob SquarePants (character) 19 Deadliest Catch 19 Patrick Star 18 The Unit 17 Irvine, California 17 Johnny Benson 14 Northgate High School (Walnut Creek, California) 13 Dirty Jobs
I just wanted to show you this as you said you were neutral but leaning towards support, and I thought this might push you over to supporting the user. Nishkid64 00:16, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
Generaly speaking no. I know there are hundreds if not thousands of such images around the place, but recently we have been trying to enforce the fair use criterea more strictly and one of the points there is that we only accept fair use (aka unfree) images if it is not possible to create or find a free licensed photo that would convey the same information. Generaly speaking unfree material that is only used to show what the subject(s) look like will fail that test, sice it's usualy possible to photograph the members during various events (possible exceptions might be if the image is used to iulstrate a secton about a particular style/gimic the artist(s) used to have in the past but have since abandoned, or some historic event and things like that). Iff you are reasonably sure the image pass all of Wikipedias fair use criterea for your intended use then it should be acceptable to upload. Likely tags will be either {{promotional}} (if taken from a press kit or "for the media" or simmilar section of the website) or {{fair use in|article}} if it's just a "ranom" image used on theyr website rater than something that's intended for "media use". Consider asking them to release a photo under a suitable free license before resorting to a fair use claim though. Sometimes people actualy agree to do that (be carefull to get a explicit comfirmation that it can be used by anyone under a spesific free license, not just "ok to use on Wikipedia" or simmilar), and free licensed images can be used -- well feely, without worrying about rationales and critical commentary and all that ;) --Sherool (talk) 00:38, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
I don't think its that important but if they want they can practice it on there pages until they actually put it to a public space on wikipedia, so it can look convincing or important to let it go. Nareklm 03:13, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
Many thanks. Mark83 00:49, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for spotting that one. I believe I have cleared up the worst of it. If I've missed anything or the user reappears, let me know. Best, Gwernol 02:06, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my page. I know the guy who did it, and I guess it was a joke, bu thanks for reverting it nonetheless. aido2002 03:03, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
When you have a moment, can you take a look at this article and give me your opinion? I tagged it as original research, and placed a warning on the author's talk page about Wikipedia policy on OR (this is his first contribution), but I am wondering if there is more I should do. Is there a speedy category that would fit? I would appreciate your thoughts. Thanks for your time. ---Charles 05:36, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
That was an amazing edit you did. Wow. This truly shows the speed of Wikipedia. I had just finished editing the page. It was during those few seconds when I finished editing to the time I went to check if it was on the actual page itself that you moved it. Mere seconds later, I get a message on my talk page from you informing me of what you had done. You are now officially on my "Don't vandalize" list. By the way, your user page is by far the best page - user related or otherwise - I've ever seen. You seem the most like me of any of the users I have ever come into contact with. Don't worry, I don't want to be friends with you, this isn't MySpace. I'm just saying. --Free-encyclopedia 02:38, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
I would like to thank you for reverting vandalism on my user page. --Meno25 03:32, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for reverting the vandalism to my user and user talk pages! And for updating my vandalism count! :-) --Db099221 04:12, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
Hi. Whether you leave a message or not is up to you; I don't bother leaving one if I don't think the user is going to read it. The message that I'm leaving is one I've written myself; as far as I know there is no template for it. You're welcome to adapt my message or create one of your own, but there's no requirement to leave a message. Hope this clears things up – Gurch 05:02, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
It's just information, man. Not vandalism. Is a cited website and background info on Justin Duchscherer's career not good enough for you? You don't deserve to be an A's fan. serlmano 05:31, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
My test was successful, actually. Until this test, I wasn't aware that the software would automatically fill in edit summaries if you blank a page or replace it completely with new content (you may have already known this). (Note that I didn't write those two edit summaries myself, they were added for me.) So, that's the result of my test. Heimstern Läufer 05:55, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for reverts on that very persistent vandal. =)
And thank you for the barnstar, too. I'm honored. =) Sorry about beating you to the punch. ;) I won't be doing that for awhile as I'm signing off now that those two IPs are blocked. See you around! =) -- Gogo Dodo 08:53, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
Sorry but that major tool had no right to insult the class of 07 or little shop —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Brianruocco (talk • contribs) .
Tell you what: You watch my back and I'll watch yours. These doggone kids are driving me nuts; I tried taking a break and look at my talk page! It's already full of nonsense. I tell you, Jimbo really needs to reconsider the whole notion of "open content" at this point. Far, far more than half the stuff coming in on NPP is pure crap. Also, three of my six features have devolved into former features. This is fun?!? :) - Lucky 6.9 04:03, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
Thank you for that quick revert and move on my user page. I appreciate it. ---Charles 05:51, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
Seamless Wikipedia browsing. On steroids.
Every time you click a link to Wikipedia, Wiktionary or Wikiquote in your browser's search results, it will show the modern Wikiwand interface.
Wikiwand extension is a five stars, simple, with minimum permission required to keep your browsing private, safe and transparent.