I assume from your name that you're a Tech student and/or graduate? (My wife went to the vet school in the late 1980s.) What's the story with a medical school starting there - do you know? If so, could you add anything to Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University about it? - DavidWBrooks 18:56, 15 Jul 2004 (UTC)
Whoa - that was quick! Sounds like kind a weird setup, but who knows? -DavidWBrooks 19:45, 15 Jul 2004 (UTC)
If you look into the structure of governance, VCOM's Chairman of the Board is John Rocovich, who is a member of VT's Board of Visitors and an old Hokie; VCOM's namesake Edward Via is the son of Charles Via, for whom VT's Department of Civil Engineering is named, and foundations left by the Marion Via estate provided the funds to start VCOM. In the Virginia budget environment of 2001-2004, it would have been politically impossible for VT to get approval to build a costly new medical school, but starting the school privately got around that; I think what they're trying to do (if you'll allow the use of a fuzzy they) is present the VA General Assembly with a fait accompli when VCOM gets accreditation and/or the political time is right. --VT hawkeye 20:02, 15 Jul 2004 (UTC)
Well, I live about a mile from SL, but I'm not a native -- grew up near Richmond. Reston's a cool place, though, I gotta say. VT hawkeyetalk to me 00:22, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
Ran in to some other VT alumn with the following template: {{user VT}}G. Moore
I didn't mean my work to be egotistical. I just put it up so the users could look at my work in articles. I figured it'd just be profiled away so users of the game could look at it when they like. I've deleted the article so lets leave it... There was no need to be rude about it hawkeye.. You could've just said delete it.
Actually, I did. More precisely, the entire content of my change was "Delete per nom" and a signature. And to cap off, I don't think the original nominator, User:ReyBrujo, whose text you're probably getting upset about, was being rude either. See your talk page. VT hawkeyetalk to me 15:53, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
This is the second time this has had to have been reverted, and I'm afraid that whether the Hartford Wolfpack has "retired" those numbers or not -- which they haven't, seeing as Purinton and Giroux still wear #5 and #10 -- there is no more "Hartford Whalers" team eligible to retire anything. RGTraynor 19:23, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
Considering that the numbers will hang on the same rack as 2/9/19, eradicating the information entirely is extremely pedantic. A distinction should be drawn in the Hartford Whalers article, perhaps (which I put in), but some notice needs to be taken that there are a few more Whaler numbers hanging at the Mall now. VT hawkeyetalk to me 19:59, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
If you think it's listable under the Hartford Civic Center page, feel free, but I suppose it's about as significant as if they still have the 1986 All-Star Game banner hanging from the rafters. Beyond that, no, no notice really needs to be taken, because the "Hartford Whalers" have in fact retired nothing new. RGTraynor 20:32, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
Yes, it turns out he has no notability, but the A7 criterion can only be applied when there is no claim of notability whatsoever; consensus has indicated that being a sports figure is a claim of notability. Furthermore, it should be fairly obvious when to apply the speedy deletion criteria; you had to do research in order to figure out that he's just one player who hasn't done much, which is usually what happens during an AfD discussion (i.e., the system works). I for one tend to apply the CSD rather strictly because deletions are supposed to be serious affairs. Seeing as how you're fairly new to AfD, you probably don't recognize a lot of people yet. I can tell you that Jaranda is someone who knows when articles can be speedily deleted and would have tagged it as such had it qualified. Not that his (or mine or Mgm's) judgement is infallible or anything, of course. Regards, howcheng {chat} 00:28, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
Question answered. You may want to avoid the incredulity ("?!") when you're asking questions about something you don't know much about; it tends to put people on the defensive before they even read your comment. VT hawkeyetalk to me 04:19, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
Hey you seem like a pretty big Harry Turtledove fan. I work at the Turtledove wikicity and we need all the help we can get. Anyone is invited. Raylan 15:01, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
I just saw your message in my page. The school enrollment data that the VHSL uses for its official classification figures is from the Virginia Department of Education. There is a link that gives detailed data on fall enrollment. I don't use the VHSL directory to show enrollment figures because they are grossly inaccurate for some schools, such as Alleghany which is a legit AA school, but the directory states it has 658, which is probably the 9-11 enrollment, which is how A/AA/AAA classes were determined until 2003 when they now looked at the entire school. If Alleghany had 658 in 9th through 12th grade, they'd definitely be a Group A school.
Based on the DoE's info, in 2005-2006, John Marshall had 978 students, and Walker is at 640'ish (but that's not in the DoE's data for some reason). That's why I say that Walker is the smallest AAA school. There's also some Appomattox Governor's school in Petersburg or something like that which is A in athletics and AAA in academics. . .
Yes, you are right about Richmond schools all playing in AAA just for the status. That's in the AAA Central Region's page. As with Northern Virginia being stricter about AA/AAA cutoffs, they are to a good degree, but South Lakes, George Marshall, Stuart, Falls Church, and Potomac all are AA size and are AAA anyway. It's also probably because they've been AAA so long and that they'd feel embarrassed to play in AA, like the Richmond schools.
The only place where the cutoffs will be strict are with the Loudoun schools, because they want their schools to be AA and only AA. Loudoun Valley and Stone Bridge are AAA right now, but Heritage looks like the next one that should bump up a class. Funny thing is when the next playing cycle happens, Heritage will be bigger than Stone Bridge, but they will be in AA, and Stone Bridge will be in AAA.
If you edited the Walker page, that's fine. I saw it and I don't think it changed much really, not to mention that I'm not from Richmond, though I know a lot of folks that do. Thanks.
Then Oleg Tverdovsky's nationality flag on his article needs to be changed to russian, not just in the Caroline Hurricanes article. Since the nationality stated "Ukrainian" I had thought he is. Xioyux 14:13, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
Alright, thanks for clearing that up. Xioyux 15:24, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
HELP
I have added a picture that my father is in to the Charles Schultz page and I don't know how to say the right words to get past the copy Right stuff. My dad was given the photo as part of the first over 75 team. Sparky started it it as an over 50 league --- until he turned 55 --- then it became over 55 and so on and so on ...
My dad was within a few months of Sparky's age and just went along for the ride. Sparky did not like to fly and my father would often fill in for him (on the ice) at tournments in British Coulumbia.
I digress --- How do I say the right words to keep this great photo here, where I beleive it belongs.
This Wiki stuff is much to confusing (and IMHO User Hostile). Snoopy_J@hotmail.com
PS My dad is 2nd row 7th from left (gray sweater)
PPS I also have personal autographed photo of a Jerry Heffernan who played for the Montreal Canadians, and won the Stanley Cup in 1944. I think that he is in this photo also.
<babble off>
You have worked on Naming the American Civil War within the last few months. I am stepping back from the article for a day or so to avoid an edit war. My request is that you consider stepping in to apply some peer pressure in the interest of civility, NPOV, assuming good faith, etc. It's up to you. -- Alarob 00:15, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
+regarding the fighting gravity entries I did, I forgot my password for my account, which is martinzerfas209.120.170.189 15:49, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
FYI, if you would like to add a ribbon to your user page in memory of those who were lost in today's events, you can use {{Virginia Tech ribbon}} to place a small orange and maroon ribbon in the top right corner of your user page (similar to the {{tl|administrator}} icon). --BigDT 04:21, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
For your tireless and totally uncompensated efforts against the vandalism, stupidity, and other assorted crap that have been almost magnetically drawn to Virginia Tech-related articles since news of the massacre started to filter onto Wikipedia, I award you a bonus of ten Norton dollars, redeemable in gold from His Imperial Majesty's Treasury at some point in the indeterminate future. --Dynaflow 04:22, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
I'm probably being 'super' picky about this, however your 'pro styling' of the Honored Members content, should be 'Hall of Famers' then 'Retired Numbers'. GoodDay 20:32, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
I don't know about this claim about other Wikipedias not permitting "fair use"; my guess is that under other legal systems there is some rule about how to use the logos of sports teams -- it's just not called fair use. (Otherwise, why would the Germna article on Arsenal FC show its logo?) As for this war on logos, I'm amused that some of the folks who rail about too many bureaucratic rules or wikilawyering are now indulging in that very same wikilawyering to defend their position. I'm also amused that these folks decided to allow Betacommand -- who is currently out of favor for his mechanistic approach to solving problems about inproper names & external links -- to be the point guy on this. (I can think of a few people with enough Wikipedia-wide respect who probably could get away with it.) Undoubtedly their belief comes from Jimbo's diktat against fair use in Wikipedia -- but (1) even he has admitted that fair use sometimes has its place; & (2) Jimbo has been wrong at times -- even he has admitted to his failings. Maybe we ought to ask his opinion on this, since I can't believe he wouldn't agree that the "no free use" advocates are in the wrong on this topic. -- llywrch 18:48, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
I agree with the prod. I would have done the same myself but, not being aware of the significance of the telecast, I decided to look for some direction. I certainly know that the teams involved are notable. I'll watch it until it goes red on the unlikely chance that it is disputed. Cheers! --Stormbay 23:56, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
Hi! I'm a native Japanese, living in Japan. I proofread きょうとほうそう（hiragana）to 京都放送(kannji). Fukuyama Masaharu All Night Nippon Saturday Special Tamashii no Radio (Sat. from 23:30 until 25:00) It means the program starts 23:30 on Sat. night and ends 01:00(precisely it should be 00:59, I guess.)on Sun. morning. Does it help? --Oda Mari 18:17, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
I thank u for putting in the CFL cities on the big four thread, but I still believe that the CFL is better (and you seem to agree) than the NFLE, and I was replying about a pair in a sentence about that, which I tock out because it was just silly and unture. Sry for any inconvenience and thanks again, being a Blue Bomber fan, it means alot. User:Kanga-Kucha 20:19 PM, June 09, 2007
PS, I used RW as an example because most american GI football fans would reconise him, though he is washed up due to his habit, which has lowered his performance. IMO, it should be more known that many NFL players come to play in the CFL and don't make it, or aren't as good in the CFL as they are in the NFL. There are however many examples of CFL players making it to the NFL and doing well, such as Paul Garcia and Kenton Keith.
I may also meation the Arena League, but not put down the city of the current teams, such they change like every year. User:Kanga-Kucha 20:19 PM, June 09, 2007
Dear VT hawkeye! You are receiving this newsletter because you have signed up as a member of WikiProject Ice Hockey. The purpose of this newsletter is to update on the goings on of the project, as there have been major changes, and a lot of new recognized content in the past few weeks. If you are an inactive user, you probably won't recognize the new and improved state of the WikiProject!
In the past few weeks, there has been quite heated discussion about the use of diacritics in article name. The current guideline is using diacritics in the pages of articles of all player names which require them, but redirects are exempt.
This task force was initiated by Krm500. Its current goal is to improve Henrik Lundqvist to Good or Featured article status. It covers all Swedish clubs, leagues and competitions and associated articles, players and coaches that are Swedish, or have played/coached for a Swedish club, and arenas in Sweden. They plan to eventually operate as a sort of a sub-project, which will have its own articles for creation, ranking importance and quality of articles, and co-ordinate article improvement. Its current members are Krm500, Bamsefar75, and CLAES.
By Maxim
After discussion on the WikiProject talk page, Serte created a page for Requested Images. The page encourages users to license images for use on articles. The page also has section to request images for players, arenas, game situations, miscellaneous, and team and league logos. The page has been quite popular; since it was created on July 21, there have been six completed requests. There are four currently outstanding requests:
By Maxim
On July 12, Kaiser matias announced that he had completed assessing all the articles with a {{ice hockey}} tag, sorting them into Category:Unassessed Ice Hockey articles. Kaiser matias has ranked about 9000 articles in that category, and most were stubs, and "have no information at all", according to him. Everybody is encouraged to expand the stubs into real articles. This effort took around 5 months. A big thanks goes to Kaiser matias from me and all the project.
Note: You have received this newsletter because you have added your name here. If you wish to no longer receive this newsletter, please remove your name. From the automated Animum Delivery Bot (delivered on 19:27, 2 August 2007 (UTC)).
A question on this revert: . I was under the impression that the Alleghenies ended quite a bit to the north of the New River Valley, which would actually be flanked by the Blue Ridge and the Cumberland Mountains. I think the anon might have been right, but I'll leave it to someone who is/was a local to make the final call. --Dynaflowbabble 13:23, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
I also question this revert, and I have made a note on the talk page with a suggested revision. I'm also curious about your opinion regarding the question about the campus' newfound "notoriety". It seems clear that the April massacre put the school on the map in the minds of many people, as noted by coach Frank Beamer in this article: "People know about Virginia Tech now that didn't last year at this time." In light of this, should there at least be a passing mention in the lead paragraph? HokieRNB 15:26, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
Dear VT hawkeye! You are receiving as you are a member of WikiProject Ice Hockey There's been more new thing going on at WP:HOCKEY, and I think this will help you to stay informed. Since the last newsletter sent out in August, there's been great changes. Read on to find out! Maxim(talk)
Especially due to the featured topic drive, there have been many new featured lists promoted concerning NHL awards. Here's the full list of all the 13 FL's promoted since the last newsletter.[1][2]
At the time of publishing, there were 5 lists at WP:FLC and 2 lists in the "Holding cell", as there's been an accepted guideline to not put more that 5 trophy lists at the same time to, "compensate for the sanity of the reviewers".
Check the project page if you are interested in helping out. Although it's closer to being done than not, there's still work to be done. The next topic that might be tackled is Stanley Cup, but this remains purely speculative and in discussion.
For the past month, I've been working on the 2006 Chick-fil-A Bowl article. I've brought it up to GA status and am now working on making it a featured article. I'd really appreciate it if you could take a swing by the nomination and leave any suggestions or support you might have. Thanks! JKBrooks85 03:20, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
Hi Hawkeye, I figure you might be able to help on this subject. There is currently an edit war at St. Mark's College (University of Adelaide) regarding whether a non-notable murder that occurred on the college grounds 16 years ago should be afforded a paragraph in the article. I think it's ridiculous, seeing as VT mentions the most notable school shooting in US history in a one-line wikilink. Please help end the madness. Yeti Hunter 10:32, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
Dear VT hawkeye! You are receiving as you are a member of WikiProject Ice Hockey There's been many more new things going on at WP:HOCKEY; this newsletter will be sent every two weeks/months.
If you wish to not receive the newsletter, please remove your name from the newsletter mailing list. Thanks!
By The Pancake of Heaven!
There has been numerous new recognized content, so much that it's too time-consuming to sift through the "trophy cases" on WP:HOCKEY. Some interesting achievements:
2016 NHL Draft has been newly created and has immediately become a GA status article.
We are working to create a new task force within the WikiProject to deal with topics related to the Pittsburgh Penguins. It hasn't been created yet; but it aims to expand articles based on former and current Pittsburgh Penguins players and articles. Good luck!
The original featured topic drive, initiated by Scorpion0422, has concluded succesfully. National Hockey League awards is now a featured topic, with 24 articles in total. Of them, 20 are featured lists, one is a featuredarticle, and the other three are trophy articles that were too short to become featured lists. Eight users signed up to help out, shown here. The next Featured Topic hasn't been decided upon, and the ideas and organization for it fell apart. If you have any ideas, don't hesitate to share them at WT:HOCKEY.
More editors are needed to help out with the newsletter. The newsletter creator doesn't have an infinite nor perfect supply of ideas, and thus he might omit some interesting news.
Hello VT hawkeye, this is an automated message from SDPatrolBot to inform you the PROD template you added to Boston College – Virginia Tech rivalry has been removed. It was removed by Strikehold with the following edit summary '(Remove prod, they are official ACC cross-division rivals in football)'. Please consider discussing your concerns with Strikehold before pursuing deletion further yourself. If you still think the article should be deleted after communicating with the 'dePRODer,' you may want to send the article to AfD for community discussion. Thank you, SDPatrolBot (talk) 09:42, 3 May 2010 (UTC) (Learn how to opt out of these messages) 09:42, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
Hello! WikiProject Albemarle County, an outreach effort supporting development of Albemarle County and surrounding area related articles in Wikipedia, has recently been started. As a user who has shown an interest in related topics I wanted to invite you to join us in developing content relating to the project. If you are interested please visit our page (currently under construction) and add the user badge to your talk page. Thank you!!!
As a current or past contributor to a related article, I thought I'd let you know about WikiProject Virginia Tech, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Virginia Tech. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks and related articles. Thanks!
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee,MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:49, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of players who have converted from one football code to another, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gridiron. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ• Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Fifth Down Game (1990), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rose Bowl. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ• Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:47, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
Hello, VT hawkeye. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Hello, VT hawkeye. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Hello, VT hawkeye. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Hello, VT hawkeye. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:17, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Wikiwand in your browser!
Seamless Wikipedia browsing. On steroids.
Every time you click a link to Wikipedia, Wiktionary or Wikiquote in your browser's search results, it will show the modern Wikiwand interface.
Wikiwand extension is a five stars, simple, with minimum permission required to keep your browsing private, safe and transparent.
