Loading AI tools
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
|
I notice that you have changed a large number of the hex colour values for the London Underground and other TfL services. Where have you obtained your new values from? --Redrose64 (talk) 15:35, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 18:46, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
See my reply to your comment on my talk page. SJ Morg (talk) 02:08, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
Hey there Useddenim, thank you for your contributions. I am a bot, alerting you that non-free files are not allowed in user or talk space. I removed some files I found on User:Useddenim/Sandbox/Van Hool. In the future, please refrain from adding fair-use files to your user-space drafts or your talk page.
The Mississauga City Centre Transit Terminal is one of the largest bus stations in the GTA, and you shuld be able to wikilink directly to that section header. I have fixed this by creating an article for the terminal and also restored the table format you previously created in MiWay. Secondarywaltz (talk) 16:27, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
I undid your changes because you broke UTA TRAX. Please be more careful in your editing in the future :). -- Admrboltz (talk) 17:45, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
As someone who put a lot of time in on this RDT I have to say that your tweaking is interesting. I have two minor concerns. First, be careful of the width: the RDT can take over an article if you do not do this. I think that since the diagrams have been separate rather than an integral part of the article some editors forget to watch this.
I would also not lump the New North Main Line in with the North London Line at North Acton. The North London Line crosses at right angles but as you can see from the New North Main Line article that line runs parallel to the Central line for some distance. Other than that keep up the good work! Britmax (talk) 17:03, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
Your Ally Pally branch is interesting but it doesn't have to be that long. have a look on my page for another approach. Britmax (talk) 14:32, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
WRT this thread, am I off base, or is axpde being overly-protective of BSicondom? Useddenim (talk) 23:50, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
No problem - the beauty of a wiki is others can just fix things!
Which documentation did you read? I'll take a look and see if I can improve it. Thryduulf (talk) 22:42, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
I've replied to your comment at WP:TWP#Toronto 4 foot 10-7/8 inch gauge. Mjroots (talk) 06:55, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
On this New Popular Edition map the WCML passes over the tunnel , not far north of the south portal. Britmax (talk) 15:15, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:International Railway Company logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 22:58, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
I've noticed a number of issues with the formatting of the article, causing centering to occur when not needed, and a few sections out of order, likely from improper nesting...
I don't know where to start to fix the formatting, and don't want to give you the impression that I'm not liking the changes...I'd actually like to see it formatted properly first before I suggest anything.
--Allamericanbear (talk) 14:50, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
I've reverted your changes to the template here. Your changes leave two junctions on the line marked "Holes Bay Junction" when this junction is identified by the old version, and I left the line to Exeter dotted as it was never built. Britmax (talk) 00:35, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
Fair enough with the Dorchester change. Although I would like a difference between unbuilt lines and built ones I can see the point, and have put your change back. Your Holes Bay junction curve is better than mine, by the way. The junction down and to the left is Hamworthy. I'll try to work the causeway bridge in but it works without it so it may be a while. Britmax (talk) 11:15, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
BTW I'm working up a joint railway (GN & GE) on my page. As you have sometimes changed things there I would ask you not to do so until later in the process. There are some complex junctions and if I don't notice a change someone else has made I could get totally lost. Britmax (talk) 11:19, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
I've just clarified the junctions on this template. Let me know what you think. Britmax (talk) 23:34, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
Example | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Sorry I meant to answer but time flies lately. I'm not sure it's an advantage: a little less clumsy in appearance but as the junction still uses two columns there's no gain that way. Britmax (talk) 15:54, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
Hi there, I wanted to thank you for all the work you've done on the RDTs and icons, and especially on Template:Air Rail Link. Still figuring out the system, but I think you captured most of what I was trying to do. However, I think that adding future extensions to Template:Sheppard Line Map and Template:Eglinton-Scarborough Crosstown line can be confusing for most readers. They are mentioned in the article for information, but to put them in the RDT infers that they will be built, which is speculative at best. Ng.j (talk) 02:06, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
As an addendum, I haven't been able to find solid refs on either of the two TTC lines. Sheppard is just a pipe dream at the moment, as there is no funding at all, while Metrolinx has stated in documents that the stations between Laird and Kennedy are up in the air. Midland and Ellesmere are also on the chopping block, so who knows? You may have noticed that I haven't really listed any stations except the ones that have been stated will be built, anything else is just unreferenced speculation. Ng.j (talk) 16:09, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
Thank you for your message. Now I'm using Sketsa for drawing/editing railway icons. It seems better for this task and files got smaller in bytes. --Zabob alias Tener for it:wiki (talk or it:Discussioni Utente:Tener) 09:18, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
I notice that many of the pages which you have recently changed with the edit summary "Icon fix - rename pending" now appear broken. One example was Template:Ealing Broadway station, which I have reverted for now, but there seem to be quite a number of others on a brief scan through your recent contribution history. Could you please explain what is changing, and why? - David Biddulph (talk) 09:13, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
moved to commons:Talk:BSicon/New icons and icon requests#Not duplicates
Hi, it was not a real speedy delete reason, so I thought easier to change the size. But that turned out to be a flop. I will exterminate if you think it is very easy to recreate as needed. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:43, 27 August 2011 (UTC)
Removed to Template talk:North East railway line
Okay, I'm going to stamp my foot down here and say that if you insist that ug- icons are foorpath icons, you have to proove it. SHow me articles that use them so, 'cause I look at this and and I see NO such usage of them whatsoever, but I see plenty of use of the dark green set for paths: hu:Fertő tavi kerékpárutak, Minuteman Bikeway, Northampton and Lamport Railway, Ribble Way, de:Oder-Neiße-Radweg, la:Iter a Burdigala Narbonem, la:Iter a Lugduno Batavorum Argentorate... Do note that they also are different shades of green! ug- is #2CA05A, and that of the -green/f- is #008000, as we noted on Commons. Circéus (talk) 13:01, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
See my edit summary for this diff. Basically, the text originated from us, and Facebook copied us based on the terms of our free license. This is actually how our license is supposed to work, and I've had it happen in other articles, where people copy us (sometimes violation of the terms of our license), and then editors think that we copied them rather than the actual case, that they copied us. So the paragraphs are fine. Please do not reinsert the tag without other evidence. Thanks! SchuminWeb (Talk) 05:17, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
I reverted some of what you did because, as I stated, it didn't fit the style used elsewhere on the page. The Great Central winds in and out of the map all the way up and down it, trying to make that use LUECKEs would be pointless, so why do the same for Dearne Valley? I can understand putting them on the same column, but why not stick with the CONTs used elsewhere?. As for Curzon street, that was perfectly fine - the icons were clear and it didn't disrupt the straight central line. While I appreciate your work creating these icons, the diagonal cross in 2 icons you added near Leeds disrupt the straight flow and are to be honest rather hard to decipher - there is a limit to what can be achieved on a small icon, and given doing so would not actually make the diagram thinner, it seems better to have clarity. -mattbuck (Talk) 15:39, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at Template talk:S-line#Editprotected circular parameters. Sameboat - 同舟 (talk) 23:04, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
Hi, why has this edit produced duplicate rows? --Redrose64 (talk) 18:28, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
I noticed no one had answered this question. Perhaps they can answer it on WP:VPT.Vchimpanzee · talk · contributions · 19:42, 19 January 2012 (UTC)
Do not blindly revert my edits at Template:Eglinton-Scarborough Crosstown line. Your reverts put back speculative stations that are not officially part of the current plan of the line. EelamStyleZ talk 13:14, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
Hi. When you recently edited London Underground engineering stock, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ashford (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:57, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
128.205.48.115 (talk) 14:35, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
128.205.48.116 (talk) 13:31, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
128.205.48.117 (talk) 19:04, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
128.205.48.120 (talk) 21:05, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
Fixed by changing {{{#|}}} into {{#if:{{{#|}}}|{{{#}}}}} because without the parser function certain wiki elements will be ignored. -- Sameboat - 同舟 (talk) 01:42, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
Re these changes on {{Buckie and Portessie Branch}}. The arrangement from Keith West Junction on the I&AJR and Aultmore does not look too good, however I am not sure how to improve it, possibly going to {{BS5}}...
I am also not entirely sure about the use of the {{BSkm}} parameter. This template was intended for distances, and using it in this application does not really work for me. The text is a bit small for my liking, and when I viewed on my smartphone it does not read very well. (Yes I know that this item it something you have being doing for quite some time, and I have been mulling it over for a while).
Keep up the good work, I think this must be a real labour of love for you. --Stewart (talk | edits) 19:54, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
Great work. --Stewart (talk | edits) 22:42, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
Re you latest edit of {{Caledonian Railway (Carstairs to Carlisle) RDT}} . I have to agree with your edit comment:
Sorry for not being very positive on this one, however I trust it gives you some thoughts on way forward. --Stewart (talk | edits) 23:08, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
CONTr
) or CONTl
) icon.Re {{Caledonian Railway (Carstairs to Edinburgh) RDT}}, {{Caledonian Railway (Carstairs to Carlisle) RDT}}, {{aa}} and Caledonian Main Line - I would suggest that Carstairs is orientated the same way in each RDT (i.e. Carstairs above the triangular junction and Strawfrank Junction below, with the line to Edinburgh to the right). This also highlights the very sharp curve from Carstairs station when heading to Edingburgh. This way the three RDT in the article have a common layout where they meet. When I produced the RDT, I split it into three it easier to look after, but felt Carstairs should look the same in each case. Thoughts? --Stewart (talk | edits) 16:53, 24 March 2012 (UTC)
Re - {{Caledonian Railway (Carstairs to Edinburgh) RDT}} - your revision at the Edinburgh end looks good. --Stewart (talk | edits) 16:54, 24 March 2012 (UTC)
Hi, Another good tidy for {{Shields Junction}}. You will see that I have changed the template to {{BS-map}}. One improvement in my mind - which I tried to make, but struggled with the coding - is to make the line from Glasgow Central to G&PJR straight. The Paisley Canal line can stay where it is, or even at 45°, towards the bottom right. Thoughts? --Stewart (talk | edits) 18:46, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
Shields Junction | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Shields Junction | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
My thoughts on this, the Paisley Canal line needs tidying up. On thing which I am not sure about is how the Polloc & Govan/General Terminus line joins into the G&PJR. This is line comes up from low level after the City Union Line and G&PJR have joins at the west end of Shields Road platforms, rather that the City Union joining to the GP&G/General Terminus Lines first. Thoughts? --Stewart (talk | edits) 22:03, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
Kudos on the assist with Template:Pittsburgh_Light_Rail, it was confusing me some. Favor to ask however, it seems my compass was off slightly with the exact location of 279, I corrected it locationally in the template but somehow it is displaying an elevated track when it should be a subway. Appreciate your assistance on this and thanks for all your expertise! Marketdiamond (talk · contribs) 08:54, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
Ref the edits on {{Glasgow, Barrhead and Kilmarnock Joint Railway}}. At the top where the railway crosses the Polloc and Govan. Firstly the crossing was over the P&G not under, secondly, I do not believe there was a second crossing for South Side station, which diverged from the later route north of the P&G. --Stewart (talk | edits) 12:55, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
Hi Useddemin, here is some new info for you. Best regards, Clausthal (talk) alias Lantus 07:30, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
Seamless Wikipedia browsing. On steroids.
Every time you click a link to Wikipedia, Wiktionary or Wikiquote in your browser's search results, it will show the modern Wikiwand interface.
Wikiwand extension is a five stars, simple, with minimum permission required to keep your browsing private, safe and transparent.