![]() | This page is a topical archive of past discussions from the current talk page for the topic:
"Dumped". In order to preserve the record of past discussions, the contents of this page should be preserved in their current form. Please do NOT make new edits to this page. If you wish to make new comments or re-open an old discussion thread, please do so on the current talk page page. If necessary, copy the relevant discussion thread to the current talk page page and then add your comments there. |
Notice of Wikiquette Assistance discussion
Hello, TopGun. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Wikiquette assistance regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.-- ÐℬigXЯaɣ 13:24, 9 March 2012 (UTC)
Edit-warring dispute
I have reported you for edit-warring over Folland Gnat. Please comment there. AshLin (talk) 09:57, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
June 2012
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia. However, please know that editors do not own articles and should respect the work of their fellow contributors. If you create or edit an article, know that others are free to change its content. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ Talk Email 07:30, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
- Do not post retaliatory warnings like this again when you are warned for editwar or for following some one around - I have no problem if you just happen to edit any articles that I do, I pointed out a pattern to you. --lTopGunl (talk) 21:26, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/f/f1/Stop_hand_nuvola.svg/30px-Stop_hand_nuvola.svg.png)
Your recent editing history at Indo-Pakistani wars and conflicts shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Toddst1 (talk) 18:40, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
- TG, this is a day old so it's not really current. But, aren't you under a 1RR restriction? If yes, you've violated that. --regentspark (comment) 19:18, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
- Age has nothing to do with an edit war. They can be slow or fast. Toddst1 (talk) 19:34, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
- I didn't mean that. Just surprised that no one has reported it. TG is amongst a bunch of editors who watch each other like hawks. --regentspark (comment) 19:40, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
- Age has nothing to do with an edit war. They can be slow or fast. Toddst1 (talk) 19:34, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
Notice of Wikiquette Assistance discussion
Hello, TopGun. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Wikiquette assistance regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.--DBigXray 14:04, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
- {{facepalm}} For the barnstar? Eh. Have fun there, it wasn't even my edit (even if I suppose that it was an attack on you - you can not revert others' edits - you'll need assistance for that given that you keep on editing other people's edits). --lTopGunl (talk) 14:11, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
- (edit conflict)
Supreme facepalm of destiny... All I wanted to do, was just to state it out for all to see that I forgive Raj and that I WON'T retaliate against him (ala tete-for-tate style) for whatever he said/did to me on ANI/WP. With you being my witness, that's all. This WQA thing is totally beyond me and quite frankly I'm equally as flabbergahsted as you are right now. --Dave ♠♣♥♦™№1185©♪♫® 14:22, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
- Regretting that I even replied there, trying to learn that one since a few months. Wonder how you stayed away from that ANI! --lTopGunl (talk) 14:25, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
- FWIW, I was told to shut up and stay away at all cost, trust the Admins and the sensible editors to speak because if I'm wrong, I'll know about it pretty soon but if I'm right, then there's nothing to worry about. Been doing this since 2008, its a tried and tested formula given to me by an Admin who has left WP, sadly. --Dave ♠♣♥♦™№1185©♪♫® 14:37, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
- Regretting that I even replied there, trying to learn that one since a few months. Wonder how you stayed away from that ANI! --lTopGunl (talk) 14:25, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
- (edit conflict)
Refactoring RfC comments
This discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
Hi TopGun, this kind of refactoring of another editor's posts is highly inappropriate. Since I have set up the RfC, if you want to change the format, please discuss them with me. And, please do not touch other people's posts. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 13:19, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
|
Wikiwand in your browser!
Seamless Wikipedia browsing. On steroids.
Every time you click a link to Wikipedia, Wiktionary or Wikiquote in your browser's search results, it will show the modern Wikiwand interface.
Wikiwand extension is a five stars, simple, with minimum permission required to keep your browsing private, safe and transparent.