Loading AI tools
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | → | Archive 5 |
Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Thebiguglyalien. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:
Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.
Again, welcome! MPS1992 (talk) 16:29, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Irreligion in Estonia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Springer. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
The Original Barnstar | |
For excellent work on Political ideologies in the United States. May this barnstar be the first of many. Ruбlov (talk • contribs) 22:52, 10 April 2022 (UTC) |
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Gestalt shift and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 24#Gestalt shift until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. signed, Rosguill talk 19:51, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
Hi Thebiguglyalien. I noticed that you recently used allsides.com as a reference in Pew Research Center political typology. Please note that the general consensus as expressed at WP:RSN is that it does not meet the reliable sourcing criteria for such information. I've gone ahead and removed it. If you disagree, let's discuss it. You may want to check WP:RSP and WP:RSN to help determine if a source is reliable. Thanks.--Hipal (talk) 16:38, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Public policy of the United States, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Naturalization Act.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
Are you able to do Interwiki?Xx236 (talk) 13:23, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
For creating Esperanto in the Soviet Union, well-written and interesting article.
Funny, I was actually planning on creating that article myself, and have been in the process of putting it together for months—however, you've done such a good job of it that I'm not sure how much I could add at this point. An excellent article that was long overdue for creation. Keep up the good work! Kurtis (talk) 01:17, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! CactiStaccingCrane (talk) 04:03, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
On 1 August 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Education for Economic Security Act, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Education for Economic Security Act prohibited secular humanism in magnet schools? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Education for Economic Security Act. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Education for Economic Security Act), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:02, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
Vital Barnstar | |
Thanks for cleaning up Skeleton and expand it to 30kb. Hopefully, this would be the first of many and pave the way for the eventual ambitious goal. CactiStaccingCrane (talk) 14:01, 1 August 2022 (UTC) |
![]() |
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar | |
This is for your expansion of a whopping 9 articles: Social equality, Secularism, Rock (geology), Skeleton, Earth science, Man, Fiction, Human behavior, and Nutrition. And... |
![]() |
The Stub Barnstar | |
This is for your whopping expansion of 107813 bytes. Congratulations! CactiStaccingCrane (talk) 02:15, 1 September 2022 (UTC) |
Hi Thebiguglyalien,
You have been invited, along with the other participants in Wikiproject Vital Articles, to start editing the Technology page and add references. Our goal is, by September 3rd, to have the article at least to B-class, but what would be generally preferable is to improve this article to the extent that it gets to GA-status. I may post a notice to the community bulletin board, but it is not definite. I hope to see the Technology article improved! We're also looking for assistance on our GA drive. 𝙷𝚎𝚕𝚕𝚘𝚑𝚎𝚊𝚛𝚝 ⋅𝚃𝚊𝚕𝚔⋅ 02:43, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
To request my attention, find my talk page and I will respond within 24 hours.
𝙷𝚎𝚕𝚕𝚘𝚑𝚎𝚊𝚛𝚝 ⋅𝚃𝚊𝚕𝚔⋅ 02:43, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Political ideologies in the United States you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Xx78900 -- Xx78900 (talk) 19:20, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
The first ever Vital GA Drive by the WikiProject Vital Articles has begun. The drive aims to improve Coffee and Land to good article status within 45 days, from 1 September to 15 October 2022. The Vital GA Drive is WikiProject Vital Articles's first step at achieving its ambitious goal: all Vital articles achieving good article status by 2032.
You've received this message because your name is on Wikipedia:WikiProject Vital Articles and Wikipedia:WikiProject Vital Articles/30 kB drive. If your name only appear at the 30 kB drive page, you won't receive any more future messages from the WikiProject. If you don't want to receive such messages anymore, you can remove the template {{MMsgI|user=YOURUSERNAME}} at the project's member list. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:30, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Human behavior, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mental disability.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
Hi. I see you’re a member of the Politics WikiProject - I’ve made a number of proposals to update the article about Jenny Durkan, the former mayor of Seattle. Talk:Jenny Durkan#Proposals September 2022 I have a conflict of interest because I have a personal (unpaid) connection to Durkan. Do you have time for an independent review? Thanks!.1920sportsfan (talk) 17:53, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Medication of children and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 September 18#Medication of children until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. MB 06:42, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Jane Pierce you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Unexpectedlydian -- Unexpectedlydian (talk) 12:20, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
wow! excellent work on the article that I created, namely History of the United States government. you truly enriched and expanded the article. your idea to structure it by presidnetial administration was very ambitious, but you really implemented it in a highly skillful way. I like the scope and content that you added. well done indeed. thanks for your work! please enjoy this barnstar, as a token of thanks. keep it up!
![]() |
The U.S. Barnstar of National Merit | |
for your hard work and thoughtful, insightful approach to greatly expanding and structuring a wealth of material, at the article History of the United States government. Sm8900 (talk) 14:59, 14 October 2022 (UTC) |
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Caroline Harrison you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of SusunW -- SusunW (talk) 13:40, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
see here, the sixth example. Sorry to have confused you. --Quisqualis (talk) 21:46, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Politics in The Simpsons you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Nineteen Ninety-Four guy -- Nineteen Ninety-Four guy (talk) 15:20, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
On 29 October 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Wedding of Grover Cleveland and Frances Folsom, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the wedding of Grover Cleveland and Frances Folsom had the president walking his own bride down the aisle? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Wedding of Grover Cleveland and Frances Folsom. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Wedding of Grover Cleveland and Frances Folsom), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Politics in The Simpsons, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages CBC, Deadline and Vanity Fair.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello, Thebiguglyalien. I would like to hear your opinion on this particular userbox – User:Katangais/Userboxes/Ian Smith. I am really puzzled that it survived two MfD nominations so far (here and here; I was the nominator in the second one, and it was closed as no consensus). Ian Smith was the leader and personification of Rhodesia, an unrecognized white racist ethnostate, so having a userbox stating support for him is highly inflammatory and divisive, IMHO. Not to mention that it fails WP:NORACISTS, and is a clear violation of WP:UBCR. — Sundostund mppria (talk / contribs) 09:54, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
Hey Alien, my apologies for going AWOL mid-review, my IRL life got so hectic I didn't have a second to even think about editing. Never meant to leave you hanging the way I did. Delighted that FormalDude took over, it was a very worthy article. Xx78900 (talk) 15:07, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 20th century in the United States, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page United States in World War II.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
Women in Green Editathon — October '22 | |
Thank you for your excellent contributions to GA nominations Jane Pierce, Mamie Eisenhower, Caroline Harrison, Lou Henry Hoover, Mary Arthur McElroy, Frances Cleveland and Abigail Fillmore and GA reviews for Betty Hall, Shannon Lucid, The Immaculate Collection, Katie Sierra suspension controversy, The Bone People, Rajani Pandit, 2022 CAFA Women's Championship and Agnes Weinrich at the WiG Wildcard Edition editathon! You were an amazing addition to this event, and I think you're developing strong GA editing and reviewing skills. Keep up the great work — I hope we see you at future WiG events. Best, Alanna the Brave (talk) 15:11, 12 November 2022 (UTC) |
Dear Thebiguglyalien,
Congratulations! You won the third prize in the main category as well as the first prize in the Esperanto subcategory of Wikimedia CEE Spring 2022. In order to claim your voucher worth a total of €75, please contact Manfred Werner.
Best regards.--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 09:05, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
On 17 November 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Politics in The Simpsons, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that politics in The Simpsons have caused controversy in Argentina, Australia, Brazil, and Japan? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Politics in The Simpsons. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Politics in The Simpsons), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Amakuru (talk) 00:03, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
Hook update | |
Your hook reached 18,674 views (778.1 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of November 2022 – nice work! |
theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/her) 08:22, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bess Truman, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Medicare.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
On 23 November 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article 2021 in China, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that China limited online video games for children to three hours per week in 2021? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/2021 in China. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, 2021 in China), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
![]() |
The DYK Barnstar | |
Hereby I award you this DYK Barnstar for 2021 in China. I wish there was a more specific one for WikiProject Years but I suppose this would do. BorgQueen (talk) 01:05, 23 November 2022 (UTC) |
Btw I've listed the article on the project page too. BorgQueen (talk) 01:09, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
If there's another year article you'd like to work on and could use a helping hand, let me know. BorgQueen (talk) 13:58, 25 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've Talk:Bess Truman/GA1begun reviewing the article Bess Truman you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 02:03, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}}
on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
— Red-tailed hawk (nest) 20:12, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
On 5 December 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Caroline Harrison, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Caroline Harrison would mail ceramic milk sets to parents that named their children after U.S president Benjamin Harrison? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Caroline Harrison. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Caroline Harrison), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:03, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
I've made a few formatting fixes, minor copyedits, and added a few more images. I'm aware of your issue with the image display so please let me know if you have any other problems or concerns. BorgQueen (talk) 06:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Hmm, I'll do my (close to) best to globalize the Culture section. Give me some time. BorgQueen (talk) 19:37, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
Yes, I've found it. It was removed by User:Deb for being too domestic. Maybe it is. BorgQueen (talk) 20:59, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
Re prose sections, I would be very careful with these as all content still needs to be referenced, and we have to take care to avoid unconscious bias or putting too much weight on certain events. As with the collages, the content needs to be discussed on the article's Talk page and/or at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Years. Deb (talk) 09:13, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
I think it should have a table like the one in the same section in 2022. What say you? BorgQueen (talk) 11:24, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
I see the template has been added but guess the GA review process hasn't started yet? Let me know when it has. BorgQueen (talk) 11:39, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
Have you read Wikipedia:Article size#Size guideline. Thanks to your expansion of 2001, the readable prose size of that article has now exceeded the size where splitting of the article is recommended. What do you propose to do about this? Deb (talk) 19:06, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
Hey, tbua, re: Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard#Requesting_additional_admins_to_comment_on_problematic_behavior. The IP has made zero edits other than to that dispute. That's not the MO of some new editor who is here to contribute productively. So, yeah, when someone like that starts potstirring, we do tend to assume they're quite likely someone who has been blocked who is trolling editors they don't like. It's not that CIVIL is being thrown out the window, it's that it's not a suicide pact.
As an aside, your talk is getting quite long, and you might want to set up automatic archiving. There's an easy copy-paste at Help:Archiving (plain and simple). Valereee (talk) 19:00, 16 December 2022 (UTC)
The article Political ideologies in the United States you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Political ideologies in the United States for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Xx78900 -- Xx78900 (talk) 08:02, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
The article Wedding of Grover Cleveland and Frances Folsom you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Wedding of Grover Cleveland and Frances Folsom for comments about the article, and Talk:Wedding of Grover Cleveland and Frances Folsom/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Nineteen Ninety-Four guy -- Nineteen Ninety-Four guy (talk) 16:23, 17 December 2022 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've Talk:Education policy of the United States/GA1begun reviewing the article Education policy of the United States you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Ovinus -- Ovinus (talk) 05:40, 23 December 2022 (UTC)
The article Dictatorship you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Dictatorship for comments about the article, and Talk:Dictatorship/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Grnrchst -- Grnrchst (talk) 16:03, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
Happy New Year and Happy New WikiCup! The 2023 competition has just begun and all article creators, expanders, improvers and reviewers are welcome to take part. Even if you are a novice editor you should be able to advance to at least the second round, improving your editing skills as you go. If you have already signed up, your submissions page can be found here. If you have not yet signed up, you can add your name here and the judges will set up your submissions page ready for you to take part. Any questions on the scoring, rules or anything else should be directed to one of the judges, or posted to the WikiCup talk page. Signups will close at the end of January, and the first round will end on 26 February; the 64 highest scorers at that time will move on to round 2. The judges for the WikiCup this year are: Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email) and Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs · email). Good luck! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:16, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've Talk:Lou Henry Hoover/GA1begun reviewing the article Lou Henry Hoover you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Unexpectedlydian -- Unexpectedlydian (talk) 23:22, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
Thebiguglyalien,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
BorgQueen (talk) 18:36, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
The article Jane Pierce you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Jane Pierce for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Unexpectedlydian -- Unexpectedlydian (talk) 15:00, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
The article Jane Pierce you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Jane Pierce for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Unexpectedlydian -- Unexpectedlydian (talk) 13:21, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've Talk:Helen Herron Taft/GA1begun reviewing the article Helen Herron Taft you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Mujinga -- Mujinga (talk) 02:20, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
The article Helen Herron Taft you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Helen Herron Taft and Talk:Helen Herron Taft/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Mujinga -- Mujinga (talk) 11:20, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
On 7 January 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Bess Truman, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that U.S. first lady Bess Truman was humiliated by a champagne bottle? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Bess Truman. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Bess Truman), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
-- RoySmith (talk) 12:03, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
![]() |
Hook update | |
Your hook reached 7,461 views (621.8 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of January 2023 – nice work! |
GalliumBot (talk • contribs) (he/it) 03:27, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've Talk:Mary Arthur McElroy/GA1begun reviewing the article Mary Arthur McElroy you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Shearonink -- Shearonink (talk) 21:01, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
After seeing this thread, I'm genuinely curious at how a year article can become a GA/FA. How do we know that the year article is comprehensive enough in the first place? CactiStaccingCrane 16:55, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
The article Caroline Harrison you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Caroline Harrison for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of SusunW -- SusunW (talk) 19:20, 21 October 2022 (UTC)
The article Caroline Harrison you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Caroline Harrison for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. SusunW (talk) 17:53, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
Hi TBUA. I am looking to make some updates to the Adam Pritzker article; my COI keeps me from doing that directly. I'd appreciate your help with the pending open edit request, entitled Update roles, based on your interest in social and political science. Thank you in advance for considering these changes and improvements. DCBPI (talk) 14:49, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
Seamless Wikipedia browsing. On steroids.
Every time you click a link to Wikipedia, Wiktionary or Wikiquote in your browser's search results, it will show the modern Wikiwand interface.
Wikiwand extension is a five stars, simple, with minimum permission required to keep your browsing private, safe and transparent.