Loading AI tools
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
--Circeus 16:54, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the advice, but just to be clear my blog is NOT spam!, its long hours wasted time on keeping all fans (including myself) updated on status of current and past players. Please feel free to advise of anything might not meet the standards for an external link. Look forward to your reply Leafakasi 11:03, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
I severely doubt that the All Blacks and France national rugby union team articles passed their FACs because they put "Notable players" instead of "Notable former players". It makes more sense to add the "former" in anyway, as then we are less likely to get people adding current players to the list. - PeeJay 00:34, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
Hey Shudde!... thanks for the Wikiproject invite! .... peads 07:23, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
I'm afraid my personal library of books about Welsh rugby is extremely limited. In fact, I'd be surprised if I had any books about the history of Welsh rugby, to be honest. I will try and acquire some though. Sorry I can't be of any help at the minute, as much as I'd love to. - PeeJay 00:12, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
I provided my opinion here. —AldeBaer 12:19, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
I just came across one of your articles, The Original All Blacks, out of pure luck. I was surprised to see that it wasn't a featured article, let alone a good article. I did notice you haven't spent a lot of time on it since the beginning of this year but it might be a suggestion to spend a short time finishing those references off at the end and consider nominating it for FA status. It seems it is not far off that at the moment... Anyway, just a suggestion. Cheers, mdmanser 00:24, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
I think it's looking pretty good. I'm in the middle of a copyçedit and I've just finished the History section, the longest part. One thing I haven't corrected yet are the scores. Some appear in words (e.g. nine to three) while other appear in numbers (e.g. 9-3). Does the Rugby Union project have a convention to represent the scores? GringoInChile 02:16, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
Sorry I'm very busy at the moment. Buc 05:51, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
The August 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
Delivered by grafikbot 10:29, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
Hey, good work on the articles you have been working on. Fra v ABs is great! I was thinking we should work on the 87/91 WCs? and how detailed do you think RWC07 results should be? Anyway, good work. (just reply here, if you want). Cvene64 14:09, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
Hey, nice job on the France-Argentina graphic (Image:FraArg_07092007.svg)! I do have one minor correction, however:
Hey, I've changed to support. One thing though, you could update the table of tests to today's date, incoporating our lacklustre win over the USA? The Rambling Man 07:26, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
The All Blacks article received heavy editing today by unregistered users, which I noticed at WikiRage.com. The article may benefit from a good review. According to Wikipedia Page History Statistics, you are one of the top contributors to that page. If you have the time, would you please read over the article and make any necessary changes. Thanks. -- Jreferee (Talk) 07:57, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
Hi Shuddle, cheers for the introduction. I'll apologise up front for any mistakes I'm making in this talk stuff, I'm having to learn it as I go along. I've not been intending to do much on rugby outside of Scotland, don't really have knowledge or access to much of it. Basically I was cruising for my local RFC a while ago and was pretty appalled at the state of the Scottish domestic section in general, in was an embarrassment and made a bad impression of the country. Thus I spent lots of time on it.
Unfortunately, I haven't even finished my initial work (still had 2nd XV system, university system, the Cups, and Caledonian Reds to do) when an established user decided to come in and start alterting the templates. While I realise this is not intended maliciously, I'm not prepared to be investing time and effort finding out (often pretty obscure) information for someone else to come along and water it down, or make it more difficult for people to get through to finding that information.
It's on that basis that I don't think I'll be finishing my work on it, which is quite sad for myself as I don't like spending times on things and not finishing them. A mate of mine said a few days ago that I shouldn't spend any time editing Wikipedia because people would just come in and change it all for the worse, I didn't believe him but actually he seems to been correct.
Anyway, good luck with the rugby pages in general. Not so much luck for Sunday though :-) I hope. HibeeJibee 00:18, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
Gareth Edwards has received four support votes. Ddfree 09:57, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
What a wonderful work about Wales national rugby union team and see you soon in RWC... :-) Ddfree 12:28, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the barnstar, mate. Much appreciatedGringoInChile 01:40, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
I'm just back from weekend away, so I'll get on to having a look over this as soon as I can. I'll add my comments at the peer review with FAC in mind. Cheers! The Rambling Man 11:48, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
I've had a quick look but can't find much wrong with it. I'll have a longer look shortly.GordyB 13:53, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
Sorry about that! I was typing up my review just as you tagged it! Blnguyen (bananabucket) 04:19, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
Hello, Shudde, in fact, Argentina coaches list is available in Spanish language, in the Argentine Rugby Union oficial web site ((in Spanish) Unión Argentina de Rugby, UAR), that you may find in Entrenadores, (coaches), and also can see:
Thanks to talk me, expecting that final 2007 RWC would be Los Pumas vs All Blacks, Shooke 00:24, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
Good re-write, and neutral. Excellent work with a difficult article. Khukri 07:50, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
Hi, thanks for starting the process! I left a reply on the article talk page to you. • Lawrence Cohen 13:30, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
You either nominated a WP:FLC or closed such a nomination recently. As such, you are the type of editor whose opinion I am soliciting. We now have over 400 featured lists and seem to be promoting in excess of 30 per month of late (41 in August and 42 in September). When Today's featured article (TFA) started (2004-02-22), they only had about 200 featured articles and were barely promoting 20 new ones per month. I think the quality of featured lists is at least as good as the quality of featured articles was when they started appearing on the main page. Thus, I am ready to open debate on a proposal to institute a List of the Day on the main page with nominations starting November 1 2007, voting starting December 1 2007 and main page appearances starting January 1 2008. For brevity, the proposal page does not discuss the details of eventual main page content, but since the work has already been done, you should consider this proposal assuming the eventual content will resemble the current content at the featured content page. Such output would probably start at the bottom of the main page. The proposal page does not debate whether starting with weekly list main page entries would be better than daily entries. However, I suspect persons in favor of weekly lists are really voicing opinions against lists on the main page since neither TFA nor Picture of the day started as weekly endeavors, to the best of my knowledge. Right now debate seems to be among support for the current selective democratic/consensus based proposal, a selective dictatorial approach like that used at WP:TFA or a non-selective first in line/calendar approach like that used at WP:POTD. See the List of the Day proposal and comment at WP:LOTDP and its talk page.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM) 19:29, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
I believe I've finished. See my messages to Lindsey8417 here. regards, Xn4 09:17, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
Proposal to have England national rubgy union team as the mainpage featured article on the day of the RWC2007 Final (20 October)IchiNiSan 12:36, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
--Andrew c [talk] 01:23, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
Blnguyen (bananabucket) 07:47, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
Hi and thanks for the review! I believe that I have addressed all of your concerns with the article. Please let me know if there is anything else that needs to be done. Cheers, CP 17:02, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
The November 2007 issue of the WikiProject Good Articles newsletter has been published. Comments are welcome on this, as well as suggestions or offers of assistance for the December 2007 issue. Dr. Cash 01:22, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
I'm trying to find a list of all the team's coaches to include in the article. I know that they havn't had a coach their entire history, and sometimes have had manager/coaches, or captain/coaches, but even a recent list of coaches would help. Thanks. - Shudde talk 01:37, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
The South Africa national rugby union team in french language is able to be a featured article... Ddfree 13:39, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
I have assessed this article, which you nominated for Good Article status, and put it on hold for one week until minor improvements are made. See notes on the talk page for details. Terraxos 16:05, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
The October 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
Delivered by grafikbot 15:16, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
You either voted on the original list of the day proposal or the revised version. A more modest experimental proposal is now at issue at WP:LOTDP. Feel free to voice your opinion.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM) 17:48, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
Just want to applaud your work on the article on this week's demonstrations in Georgia. it's good to see someone taking such a thorough approach. Feel free to let me know if i can help at some point. thanks. --Steve, Sm8900 22:59, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
The article Wales national rugby union team you nominated as a good article has passed , see Talk:Wales national rugby union team for eventual comments about the article. Well done! (Sorry for the delay in reviewing the article.) Terraxos 02:40, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
Dearest Shudde,
Thank you for your participation in my RFA, which closed successfully with 137 supports, 22 opposes, and 5 neutrals. Your kind words of support are very much appreciated and I look forward to proving you right. I would like to give special thanks to The_undertow and Phoenix-wiki for their co-nominations. Thank you again and best regards.
Ping! --ROGER DAVIES TALK 21:19, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
Ping! --ROGER DAVIES TALK 14:20, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
There have been a series of proposals to initiate a Featured List of the Day on the main page. Numerous proposals have been put forth. After the third one failed, I audited all WP:FL's in order to begin an experiment in my own user space that will hopefully get it going. Today, it commences at WP:LOTD. Afterwards I created my experimental page, a new proposal was set forth to do a featured list that is strikingly similar to my own which is to do a user page experimental featured list, but no format has been confirmed and mechanism set in place. I continue to be willing to do the experiment myself and with this posting it commences. Please submit any list that you would like to have considered for list of the day in the month of January 2008 by the end of this month to WP:LOTD and its subpages. You may submit multiple lists for consideration.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:LOTD) 15:27, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
Hi, you said on my talk page
Yeah sorry - babies have a way of suddenly distracting you for a couple of hours. If there is no other input in the next couple of weeks, I cede defeat. BTW, I think the lead on the history article is far too long - it shouldn't discuss specific seasons.
On another matter, I'm thinking we should develop a separate player infobox template for pre-professional-era players - without any of the modern competitions and allowing for the fact that the majority of games played for a national side were non-test touring games. Your thoughts? dramatic (talk) 00:59, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for your contributions! Nishkid64 (talk) 22:24, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions about User:Shudde. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 |
Thanks very much. I'm not very good at touchy-feely sentiments but I think that you probably deserve it more than me. So I am giving you the very same award.
![]() |
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar | |
For your very many priceless edits to rugby union pages GordyB |
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Bennie Osler, and it appears to be very similar to another wikipedia page: User:Shudde/sandbox. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 08:57, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions about User:Shudde. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 |
Seamless Wikipedia browsing. On steroids.
Every time you click a link to Wikipedia, Wiktionary or Wikiquote in your browser's search results, it will show the modern Wikiwand interface.
Wikiwand extension is a five stars, simple, with minimum permission required to keep your browsing private, safe and transparent.