Loading AI tools
Hi
Sorry but I undid your edit to the Cyprus page. The name of the village is still Khirokitia and that is its common name during the period being discussed in the sentence that was edited.
Normal policy is to keep to the most known name and the Khirokitia name is the one most used to reference the town, especially in works on that period of archaeology
Also it is the name of the village on most maps it would seem. eg Maplandia , Encyclopedia britannica and maps.google
thanks Chaosdruid (talk) 22:43, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
- Sorry took so long to get back to you - I dont really understand which one you want to change lol...the article Choiro or the main Cyprus page history sction or something else..
- thanks Chaosdruid (talk) 00:58, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
Thank you for uploading File:20 French Francs.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. FASTILYsock(TALK) 01:32, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
Hi
I know there is a desire to correct the spellings of places but the problem here is that many text books refer to it as the old spelling, Khirokitia.
Please can you try and rename thus:
[[Khirokitia]] [[Choirokoitia]] (Khirokitia)
My reasoning is twofold. Firstly the main body of people looking in the History articles will be researching from text book etc that have the old name. Secondly the google searches give these results
Choirokoitia - About 27,500 results (0.31 seconds)
Khirokitia - About 41,100 results (0.36 seconds)
and maybe go back and change some of them that you have already changed ?
Thanks Chaosdruid (talk) 10:49, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
- The last thing I want is you to think I am picking on you like some shool bully :¬)
- I have changed it to how it should be. Realistically we would normally go with the most well known English version but in this case I am not going to press the matter (as long as both are there lol)
- I realise there is the problem of the Choirokoitia article itself and the many archaeology articles that cover Cyprus history but they should also reflect the more well known English version until Choirokoitia becomes more well used.
- Choirokoitia (also known as Khirokitia)
- We do not, for example, still call Istanbul "Constantinole" or "Byzantium", but when speaking of it in an article about ancient history of 500 BC we would normally use the name it was called then
- "In 500 BC Byzantium (now Istanbul) was the centre of an empire..." or
- "In 470 AD Constantinople (now Istanbul) was one of the major trading..."
- That means that if talking in the article "Istanbul" about its history -
- "Trade flowing to the Black Sea from the Mediterranean through Marmara and the Bosphorus straits in 470 AD meant that Istanbul (then called Constantinople) maintained it's economic..."
- Chaosdruid (talk) 17:04, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
Hi Seric2, Why did you revert my reintroduction of the link to Operation Attila? The subsection needs a link to the Turkish invasion to provide background. The subsection is the history article is itself not neutral, but I have left it untouched, for now. Regards, Acad Ronin (talk) 18:11, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
- Hi Seric2, Roger that. Acad Ronin (talk) 10:50, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
My name is Lucas Luca, i am a diplomatic interpreter born and raised in the city, that you write as the capital of both Cyprus and northern Cyprus. My dear, Nicosia is officialy, the capital, of the Republic of Cyprus and not the capital of any northern Cyprus. By adding that, you inform everyone about wrong things.. EU, NATO, THE COUNCIL OF EUROPE, and every other diplomatic organisation around the globe, recognise Nicosia as the capital of one and only one state.. who are you to tell otherwise? who are you to inform wrongly everyone that this city belongs to 2 states? I dont think thats wise not even professional,from you, to edit an article for nicosia, a page that a lot of people visit and read, and let everyone know that what????? Nicosia is the capital of 2 states! Only Turkey recognises that, and noone else!! So i would advise you to stop and apologise, at least!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lucaluca11 (talk • contribs) 20:18, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
can you STOP adding the turkish name for larnaca and pafos airport. they are on the greek side. and the greeks use it. as you enter the airports it has there name in greek ans english not turkish so stop.
can you STOP adding the turkish name for larnaca and pafos airport. they are on the greek side. and the greeks use it. as you enter the airports it has there name in greek ans english not turkish so stop —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cyprus10 (talk • contribs) 14:52, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
So in theory as you go into the airports they should have it in Turkish as well as greek and english no?. larnaca and pafos airports are on the republic of Cyprus side. or the Greek side. Hence the official language spoken is Greek. dont you get it —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cyprus10 (talk • contribs) 17:30, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
Hello Seric2, I made some notes on the talk page of Susya here. Please take a look when you get a chance. nableezy - 15:42, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks for the information and the notes you made!
Hi Seric2! On WikiProject Israel we tend to use a specific infobox which covers our needs. There was a discussion in the past where there was no consensus to use the global infobox, which is more complicated and creates certain problems for Israeli localities. If you intend to change more infoboxes, please attain consensus at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Israel first. Cheers, Ynhockey (Talk) 20:41, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Annan Plan for Cyprus. Users who edit disruptively or refuse to collaborate with others may be blocked if they continue. In particular the three-revert rule states that making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the talk page to discuss controversial changes. Work towards wording and content that gains consensus among editors. If unsuccessful then do not edit war even if you believe you are right. Post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Uncle Dick (talk) 19:26, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
- Sorry, I will not revert any more edits made by user 178.244.133.26 in Annan Plan for Cyprus, and Thanks Seric2 (talk) 19:31, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
- Don't worry about it. Looks like you were just reverting unconstructive edits. The IP has been blocked and you're in the clear. Uncle Dick (talk) 19:40, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
A discussion has begun about whether the article Opinions of experts and commentators on the Annan Plan for Cyprus, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Opinions of experts and commentators on the Annan Plan for Cyprus until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.
You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Shadowjams (talk) 09:59, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
I was about to suggest leaving notes for the other guy and then ask the Admins to admonish/shut him down for a day or so. After looking at your history and deleted comments, I'm not sure if they would believe us/me! They might shut one of us down! :) Student7 (talk) 02:22, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
- Please report sockpuppetry to WP:SSP. This is for English Wikipedia suspected violations only. Whatever he has done on sister projects is blameless here, I fear, though the admins may take it into account. Their problem, of course, is language, not quickly surmounted with all the other problems regarding sockpuppetry. Best to forget suspected violations outside English Wikipedia IMO. Student7 (talk) 21:14, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
- See answer to my question on doctored photo at Wikipedia_talk:Image_use_policy#.22Doctored.22_photo. Student7 (talk) 21:17, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
- Check my entry on Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Pergamon for accuracy. Thanks. Student7 (talk) 13:23, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
- We appear to have an admin on our side. See entry on my page where you have been writing. So things are looking up. I am familiar with this admin who is (obviously) knowledgeable. And he is probably familiar with your name since he has researched the problem. So if you see it before I do, you can either let him know or leave a message for me (I am deliberately two days behind, but I will see your note the same day). Student7 (talk) 21:31, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
- You might be enlighted or amused by the exchange on Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Pergamon. I think we have the day. The Admins found the same problems you did which was pretty incredible, I thought, since I hadn't said anything. So hopefully, we are all set here. Student7 (talk) 04:02, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
Please stop what you are doing. The proper way to move a page is to use the "Move Page" function, not copying from one title and pasting to another. See WP:How to move a page. Doing it the way you are messes up the licensing requirements for attribution to authors. nableezy - 16:00, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
- Yes, you are right. If the move is contentious it should go through the process at WP:RM, and you are free to revert a move made without discussion. The issue is how you do it, not if you do it. Ill see if an admin can repair the moves and put the articles back in their original location. Just keep in mind that if you want to move a page it needs to be done through the "Move Page" function and not be copying and pasting content from one title to another. nableezy - 17:26, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
- Making a mistake isnt the end of the world, the important thing is to learn from it and to try not to repeat it. Just keep this in mind for the future. Take care, nableezy - 20:46, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
Hi. I just repaired the "copy-and-paste" moves you made. In the future, please use the "Move" button. If you're not sure where to find it or how to use it, please read Help:Moving a page. If you have any questions, leave a message on my Talk page. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 08:41, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
I have seen the edit war, but Ercan airport is indeed an unrecognized airport. It does not have Greek name because, first it lies in the unrecognized part of Cyprus under a de facto entity and secondly the Greek Cypriots do not want to legitimze the status airport due to its location in an unrecognized entity.
- I told you again Greek Cypriots do not use a Greek name for the airport in the north because it is not recognized by them, and it would legitimize it. Stop reverting it.
- You are engaging in vandalism. You do not provide any reasoning and explanations at all. Any further attempts will be automatically be reverted.
- Again the Republic of Cyprus does not recognize the aiport and the entity it is sitauted in. That is why they never use a Greek name in order not to legitimize it. Do not insist on this.
Wikiwand in your browser!
Seamless Wikipedia browsing. On steroids.
Every time you click a link to Wikipedia, Wiktionary or Wikiquote in your browser's search results, it will show the modern Wikiwand interface.
Wikiwand extension is a five stars, simple, with minimum permission required to keep your browsing private, safe and transparent.
