Loading AI tools
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is my talk page, archives of past discussions are on the archive box on the right. --Arnzy (talk • contribs) 06:24, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
I hope you don't get too offended by the following comment: Have you actually read the article? In the lead it clearly states that two people were convicted of voluntary manslaughter.
There are BLP issues, due to the fact that not all the people involved were convicted of manslaughter.
Besides murdered is a loaded term, while on a personal level I might agree that she was murdered, I do realise that the term promotes a point of view.
Died/Killed are purely factual terms, they are NPOV and the article loses nothing from their use.
The circumstances of her death and the trial are fully documented later in the article, so readers are more than capable of coming to their own conclusions.
Sennen goroshi (talk) 03:12, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
Sorry one more point - the term died had been used since 2006, the term murdered was introduced without any form of consensus - for a term to survive for 2 years consensus is very obvious - there must be new consensus if you wish to use the term murdered Sennen goroshi (talk) 03:31, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for your support and encouragement and great work on Wikipedia. I'm taking a lengthy break from Wiki (and am retiring under this username) but I may be back in the future. Good luck. JRG (talk) 06:17, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
Image:Sunbus VST.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:Image:Sunbus Mercedes-Benz O500LE with Bustech VST body.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[Image:Sunbus Mercedes-Benz O500LE with Bustech VST body.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 07:15, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
Yep - him again. Unfortunately just a temporary IP address so there's little that can be done except semi-protection; which is not yet called for here. Keep up the good work - Peripitus (Talk) 11:11, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
See that one now - obvious and blocked. I think I'll add a few more brisbane items to the watchlist now - Peripitus (Talk) 12:50, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
The December 2008 issue of the WikiProject Australia newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. This message was delivered by TinucherianBot (talk) 07:01, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
Does the latest vote in this deletion discussion seem similar to another? SEO75 [talk] 11:21, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
Hello there, Here's a new idea to merge Template:TL Bus Station, Template:Citytrain Station and Template:Brisbaneferries into Template:TL Infrastructure. Something to work on if you would like to help out. ;-) matt-(my page-leave me a message) 14:20, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
Please note that I wasn't the one who made the change. I made similar edits regarding this, can you please revert them. Thanks! Cashier freak (talk) 04:40, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
to remove the conflict of interest tag from the USC page, what changes do you see as needing to be made to the page? I acknowledge that WikiUSC is a university-administered account, but do not see that as necessarily a detrimental thing - we have provided the base information, and encourage others to develop it further. the WikiUSC account exists to monitor the truth and accuracy of submissions, not to administer bias. for anyone to start any Wiki page indicates some conflict of interest - they are interested enough to dedicate the time to create the entry. if someone was truly neutral, would they care either way what content Wikipedia included? regardless, any feedback on improving the USC entry to remove the COI flag would be appreciated. WikiUSC (talk) 04:52, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
Lately he has been reverting my edits to many airports regarding Kuala Lumpur. If you see my message on my talk page, he told me to remove the "Kuala Lumpur-Sepang" designation cause it seems useless and also he said the WP:AIRPORTS discussion made no decision to disam KUL. Thanks! Cashier freak (talk) 21:15, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
Sorry who is JRG? Lonelygirl16 (talk) 07:45, 4 May 2009 (UTC) And I'm not changing without consensus. The neighbouring station box has different Countrylink regions. It's consistent with the website too: see www.countrylink.info/ 07:49, 4 May 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lonelygirl16 (talk • contribs)
I don't understand. why do you think I am another user? why won't Endarrt talk to me? Lonelygirl16 (talk) 12:21, 5 May 2009 (UTC) can you please reply to me? I want to make sure I am doing the right thing. thanks Lonelygirl16 (talk) 13:10, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
It's in the WP:AIRPORTS archives (feel free to look it up), but to my knowledge a general consensus is that former destinations is not encyclopedic, would fail WP:LISTS anyway, unless if its entirely complete and fully referenced. In it's current form, it would fail both. I dont see why this article should be an exception to all other airport articles which do not have former destinations (as it would be incomplete, hard to maintain (for bigger airports) and would likely be poorly sourced anyway). --Arnzy (talk · contribs) 13:31, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
Article structure - The structures suggested in this section are intended to serve as a starting point for writing a good article; they are not meant to enforce a single, binding structure on all articles, nor to limit the topics a fully developed article will discuss.
Hi Arnzy - good pickup...not sure how I missed this on (probably trimmed my watchlist in the past) - blocked now - Peripitus (Talk) 10:37, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
I agree that this person may be a sock, as I have seen many variations of the name in some old edit histories, but I don't see a connection to JRG... Either way, if you are going to tag someone for sockpuppetry, you need to both tag the puppeteer, and file a file a requst for a sockpuppet investigation.Drew Smith What I've done 04:45, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
Seamless Wikipedia browsing. On steroids.
Every time you click a link to Wikipedia, Wiktionary or Wikiquote in your browser's search results, it will show the modern Wikiwand interface.
Wikiwand extension is a five stars, simple, with minimum permission required to keep your browsing private, safe and transparent.