Loading AI tools
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | Archive 8 | Archive 9 | Archive 10 | → | Archive 15 |
Thanks for the GA review and your helpful additions. --DavidCane (talk) 13:22, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
I thought you might like to be able to quote the rule on captions in your reviews. The rule is that whole sentences require ending punctuation, while sentence fragments should not have ending punctuation. See Wikipedia:MOS#Formatting_of_captions. Please forgive me if I am butting in. Best wishes, Xtzou (Talk) 14:43, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
I have attempted to bring the article in line with your comments, which really were very minor. I know you've got a race going on there at GAN but they were the sort of thing I've seen reviewers fix themselves in the past. Ditto "I will allow up to seven days for these issues to be fixed"; I am not sure editors respond very well to that sort of language. But anyway, I have sorted the article. I tried two columns but the sole effect was a really cluttering of the article, so I decided against it. - Jarry1250 [Humorous? Discuss.] 18:38, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
Hi this is mzwhiz21, thanks again for reviewing my article in such a timely manner! I believe I added the template to the discussion page but if that is not right please let me know. I still am trying to figure out this whole process because I am new to wikipedia and the GAN. Let me know if I need to do anything else. Thanks!!Mzwhiz21 (talk) 18:40, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
I have fixed the three citations you asked me to look at and I believe I fixed the works cited section you were referring too. If there still is something I have overlooked or done wrong, just let me know and I'll go over it again. Thanks again for all of your help with the review!Mzwhiz21 (talk) 15:34, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
I have went through and fixed all of the references and citations. I think its ready to be reviewed again. The only thing I question is if it is redundant of me to post the works cited section when the reference list is the same thing. Thanks!Mzwhiz21 (talk) 17:10, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
Hey this is Rubyt38, thanks a lot for reviewing my article. I think I have addressed and fixed everything that you asked. I basically went through and did my citations over again. I believe its all ready for you again. However, if there is something that I missed just let me know and I will fix it ASAP. Thanks again for taking the time to review it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rubyt38 (talk • contribs) 01:17, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
Thank you very much for the GA Review. Your comments really helped out a lot. I also wanted to thank you for doing all of this so fast. The semester is quickly coming to an end and this needed to be done so it means a lot that you addressed the article right away. Thanks again for all your time. Rubyt38 (talk) 17:00, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
Hi there, just dropping a note to say I've responded to you GA review on the review page. Thanks very much for doing this review so promptly. --Mkativerata (talk) 19:39, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
Hi SMasters, Thanks for the heads up on this one, I was slightly suspicious because there was a GAfailed template and two GAN templates on the talk page, all dating from this month; and little in the way of corrective actions. I also saw your review and some possible copyvios (which went yesterday). It turns out to be a student project that was submitted now, in the expectation of a long wait for a review; and they were caught out(?). See you at the finish line, I hope to have 40 reviews in (but not necessarily passes or non-passes) by this weekend. I hope your's go well too. Pyrotec (talk) 07:55, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
Jezhotwells has eaten your {{cookie}}! The cookie made them happy and they'd like to give you a great big hug for donating it. Spread the WikiLove by giving out more {{cookie}}s, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Thanks again!
Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat a cookie with {{subst:munch}}!
–– Jezhotwells (talk) 10:11, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
I believe that I have addressed your comments in the GA Review. Please let me know if there is anything else! Canadian Paul 21:57, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
Sorry, I have been busy. I will be working on the article. XL XR2 (talk) 22:18, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | Archive 8 | Archive 9 | Archive 10 | → | Archive 15 |
Seamless Wikipedia browsing. On steroids.
Every time you click a link to Wikipedia, Wiktionary or Wikiquote in your browser's search results, it will show the modern Wikiwand interface.
Wikiwand extension is a five stars, simple, with minimum permission required to keep your browsing private, safe and transparent.