Loading AI tools
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Would you please have a look at the rather abrupt move of this article to IBM Personal Computer (original) by someone called User:PlayStation69? I don't agree with this renaming of the article; the original title was perfectly clear and the suffix "original" is un-needed. --Wtshymanski 21:38, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
Hey, I was gonna transfer this over to commons but the no rights reserved has been deprecated there. I was wondering if you could switch it to PD-self or choose another free license like the GFDL, cc-by or cc-by-sa. Thanks, Yonatan (contribs/talk) 06:11, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
I thought I would let you know that this article is up for deletion again and you can vote on it at the following page: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trinity Christian High School (2nd nomination)
--MJHankel 01:10, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
Couple of things. The article made FA status - thanks for your help! I also had a question about this sentence of the lead that I think you developed "In 1991, following an advertising campaign, the push-up Wonderbra became a sensation in the U.K.,..." Do you have some support this attribution to "an advertising campaign" for the U.K. resurgence? The articles I've read suggested it was driven by shifts in fashion (including one story of French haute couture models who took a liking to the bra style) and some media coverage. Still, I wont claim I did exhaustive research on the European end of the business history so I figured I'd ask you. Let me know your thoughts. Cheers. Mattnad 01:38, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
OK, is it like a second hand opinion what you need? I'll go over and have a look - Cheers! Tellyaddict 11:44, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:JFK_Entry_in_Berlin_Golden_Book.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 19:23, 24 March 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MECU≈talk 19:23, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:JFK_Ich_bin_ein_Berliner_-_civis_Romanus_sum_2.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 19:23, 24 March 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MECU≈talk 19:23, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:JFK_Ich_bin_ein_Berliner_-_civis_Romanus_sum.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 19:24, 24 March 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MECU≈talk 19:24, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
Please stop edit-warring over the issue of nameboards for the Tyne and Wear Metro station articles (e.g. Haymarket Metro station). Some kind of compromise needs to be reached, and persistent tit-for-tat reversions will not achieve this. I have left this message for all the editors involved.
As a compromise, I suggest having the nameboards somewhere else in the article but not as the station name in the infobox. Personally, I think this is the fairest solution. Please give it consideration. --RFBailey 19:44, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
You have been blocked for violating the three-revert rule on Tram. Please be careful to discuss controversial changes rather than engaging in an edit war. The duration of the block is 24 hours. If you wish to request review of this decision, please email me or place {{unblock|reason here}} on this page. Seraphimblade Talk to me 16:20, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
What Yamla saw is the same thing that I did, that all of your edits removed "light-rail vehicle" from a certain paragraph. This was evidently a contentious edit. Generally, if you find yourself reverting (or getting reverted) even once, it's best to stop and talk right then rather than keep on going-obviously, someone disagrees with you. It's also best during the conversation to stop editing until things are agreed on, it's tough to hit a moving target. We've also got dispute resolution if things absolutely can't be worked out. As to "incorrect edit", that's pretty mild incivility. Civility doesn't mean "don't speak your mind", it means "comment on edits and content, not people". I've seen some pretty nasty edit summaries, and as they go, that one's pretty tame. Remember though, a revert need not go back to an exact copy of a previous version. Repeatedly making a contentious edit, even as part of a larger edit, is reverting. Seraphimblade Talk to me 18:53, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
Seamless Wikipedia browsing. On steroids.
Every time you click a link to Wikipedia, Wiktionary or Wikiquote in your browser's search results, it will show the modern Wikiwand interface.
Wikiwand extension is a five stars, simple, with minimum permission required to keep your browsing private, safe and transparent.