Loading AI tools
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Hello ProhibitOnions. See Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2010 May 3#Handover, where your A5 speedy deletion of the previous Handover article has been mentioned. The deleted article appears to have been unsourced, so I don't know what is best to do. Calling this a 'Transwiki' situation might not be 100% accurate, since the old Wikipedia revisions did not get moved to Wiktionary. Holding an AfD might be one option. This does get confusing. EdJohnston (talk) 12:26, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
Hi. You altered the style of the titles of most recent British ministries from Brown Ministry to Cabinet of Gordon Brown. The Cabinet (i.e. the collection of ministers) isn't quite the same thing as a Ministry (i.e. the term of office of a Prime Minister). In particular, I must oppose the title Cabinet of Harold Wilson's second prime ministership - this is appallingly convoluted. Surely, if the term Cabinet is to be used, the title should be Second Cabinet of Harold Wilson. Even if you use the current style, the term is Premiership, not Prime Ministership. BartBassist (talk) 14:55, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
can you upload this
in commons too, that we can use it in german wikipedia?Sandmann4u (talk) 10:55, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
Alright, there are more important things. The pic is now included as first picture in the german article. You are free to delete this section - problem is solved. Sandmann4u (talk) 02:54, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
According to WP:ELYES
Links to be considered
...
3. Sites that contain neutral and accurate material that is relevant to an encyclopedic understanding of the subject and cannot be integrated into the Wikipedia article due to copyright issues, amount of detail ...
The link you removed meets these criteria. I fail to understand why you remove it without providing a replacement and I suspect any replacement would be less compressive than the link. Tom94022 (talk) 00:47, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:DaggorathScreenshot.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:59, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:DaggorathWizard.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:01, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
FYI, I removed the copyrighted material from the article but retained your trimmed headers. Thanks! Stile4aly (talk) 17:34, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
A discussion has begun about whether the article Duck Head, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Duck Head until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.
You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Fæ (talk) 07:05, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
Hi,
As you have recently edited one of the two articles mentioned, I am notifying you of the proposed merger. Please comment at Talk:Magical negro#Proposing a merger. Thank you, Bigger digger (talk) 17:02, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:EdselShowTitles.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:21, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
I don't wish to start an edit war, so I am going to talk to you about the changes you have made to the article here. The term is not just used by White Castle but other chains such as Applebees and Unos have been using the terms for several years now. The term "slyders" was what WC used because they found sliders had been generasized when they went to trademark it in 93.
Could you please revert your changes as they are factually incorrect? --06:22, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
Would you like to finish that move and bring the talkpage and history along, please? Thanks. (Also, there's an WP:AN discussion regarding this at the moment.)--SarekOfVulcan (talk) 19:41, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Fredbarrie.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Damiens.rf 17:12, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
This message is being sent to you because you have previously edited the Wikipedia:Naming conventions (use English) page. There is currently a discussion that may result in a significant change to Wikipedia policy. Specifically, a consensus is being sought on if the policies of WP:UCN and WP:EN continues to be working policies for naming biographical articles, or if such policies have been replaced by a new status quo. This discussion is on-going at Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (use English), and your comments would be appreciated. Dolovis (talk) 17:08, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:LPlogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 05:14, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
What would have sufficed to show the significance of this music group? I feel like a quick googling of "fm3" and "china" would probably present a wealth of evidence? Thanks, --Makuro (talk) 07:52, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
I found two or three articles about them at the New York Times just now. Sorry I missed the nomination for deletion, I would have tried to add these citations to the article if they weren't there already. Hewinsj (talk) 13:18, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
i find no real basis for the deletion of the buddha machine and FM3 page. there are many other pages out there for "products" and as a band, we consider and have always considered the buddha machine a "release" no different than a vinyl, cd or cassette... this has been stated repeatedly in interviews online and in print. is not all music released on a physical format a "product"? if you have a problem with the buddha machine page, you should edit it, not make a wholesale deletion... or perhaps change it to a "band" page and detail FM3, which has been featured in NYT, wall st. journal, Wire, New Yorker, SF chronicle and i can go on and on with major media references (in english, deutsche, spanish, italian, chinese, etc)... if these fail to show the siginificance of the group, then perhaps the significance of most bands on wikipedia needs to be reevaluated? i suggest re-establishment of the page, and then i can add the dozens of media articles (many behind paywalls, however) to link on it giving it the proper "significance" you require... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mandopop (talk • contribs) 10:43, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:NBCUNICEFpromo.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:54, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
Hello. You removed an {{unbalanced}} tag on Gaza flotilla raid. Please note that discussion is taking place on the talk page over these concerns. With respect, unless you've read through the article and looked thoroughly at the sources given, please add the tag back. Nightw 06:56, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
I mentioned your edit here. I previously removed the tag, once from the article, then reverted another editor before self-reverting an hour later. I claimed you removed the tag again under my same reasoning. In any case, let me know if I mis-represented your actions and I will strike out the statements. WikifanBe nice 00:00, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:PrincePolo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 15:53, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
At Oneworld lead. Leaky Caldron 10:51, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
Category:Early videotape recordings, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 04:33, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
There was a requested move in the not too distant past of the move you just unilaterally made, Talk:Spam_(disambiguation)#Move_to_Spam_.28disambiguation.29. It failed 3-1, and I'd have voted fail as well had I thought it necessary. Please move the pages back and file a WP:RM for your change if you still want to do it before bots start rearranging links uselessly. (While I'm not normally one to stand on procedure for uncontroversial moves, you didn't even drop a note on the talk page. And this clearly is controversial seeing as it was tried and failed before.) SnowFire (talk) 20:48, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
If any of the following situations applies to the requested move, it should be treated as controversial:
Seamless Wikipedia browsing. On steroids.
Every time you click a link to Wikipedia, Wiktionary or Wikiquote in your browser's search results, it will show the modern Wikiwand interface.
Wikiwand extension is a five stars, simple, with minimum permission required to keep your browsing private, safe and transparent.