Hi. To tell the truth, I don’t understand the reason for your tagging the article. I’ve already furnished the article with several WP:reliable sources including DigiGuide and Michelle Yeoh Web Theatre. The references added by me provide evidence for the fact that Prapimporn Karnchanda has had significant roles in a number of films (WP:ENT #1). Is this new revision good enough? --Janggun Dungan (talk) 19:07, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions about User:PRehse. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
Hi, i am trying to add content to the list of martial arts article, some of the martial arts do not have articles written about them i.e. Puños Continuos which is a military combat system developed for the Cuban military forces. Is this an issue when adding content? Let me know
Sincerely
AC —Preceding unsigned comment added by 107.77.217.32 (talk) 21:29, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
It is a problem - by long standing consensus and general policy in Lists you need to have an article created.PRehse (talk) 21:33, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
"Puños Continous" has an article written in spanish within wikipedia, for some reason I can't figure out how to link it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 107.77.221.92 (talk) 20:13, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
It is a problem - by long standing consensus and general policy in Lists you need to have an article created.PRehse (talk) 21:33, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
Brazil has a combat system developed for the military called "Uru-Can"
Catch as Catch Wrestling should be added to United States section, it is under "catch wrestling".
Peru has a martial art developed for the streets called Bakom, sometimes called Vacon.
Recently in the United States Judokickbox was founded by cuban-americans living in Miami.
Poland section should be added and have Polish school of sabre. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 107.77.221.92 (talk) 21:04, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
You recently deleted Dog Brothers Martial Arts and 10th Planet Jiu-Jitsu from "list of martial arts" article after claiming incorrectly that they do not have an article created and that they are not martial arts, please be more careful next time you delete an entry in an article or you will be reported for vandalism. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 107.77.216.165 (talk) 19:38, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
(by talk reader)"...you will be reported." To whom? I can tell you right now that your IP can be blocked and you will be powerless to stop it. PRehse hasn't deleted anything, but go ahead and issue meaningless threats. Chris Troutman (talk) 19:41, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
Hi Chris troutman, my message was not a threat it was a statement, PRehse incorrectly deleted 2 entries in the "list of martial arts" article which were Dog Brothers Martial Arts and 10th planet Jiu-Jitsu by erroneously claiming that the 2 entries were neither martial arts or had articles written about them, if you do some searching you will find that both entries qualify. "Martial Arts" such as DBMA and 10th Planet Jiu-Jitsu were created by people, and are managed by "people" that formed "organizations" in order to "organize" instruction, competition, requirements, testing, certification, ranking, etc.
I.E. Kajukembo was created by people and is managed by an "organization"...
As for reporting "to whom?" If you or PRehse continue to erroneously erase entries after being politely proven wrong and asked not to delete such entries, then a "report of vandalism" shall be filed with a wikipedia administrator and then that administrator shall decide what to do next. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 107.77.216.165 (talk) 20:31, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
Not sure why you have added the notability tag twice now. If you feel it's not notable, take it to AfD, instead of repeatedly inserting the tag. That is the procedure when notability tags are challenged. HampsteadLord (talk) 21:37, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
HampsteadLord Well the idea is you should not remove maintenance tags without addressing the issue. As it stands it's a prime candidate for deletion but I don't believe new articles should be rushed to AfD.PRehse (talk) 21:52, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
Notability has already been established by the presence of multiple sources providing significant coverage, and going back years. I believe it is better to nominate for deletion rather than repeatedly tagging. Since you believe in waiting, I take it you will nominate in a few days or so. HampsteadLord (talk) 22:07, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
HampsteadLord Eventually I might. I usually like to give articles a couple of weeks before AfD.PRehse (talk) 22:14, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
I eagerly look forward to that course of action. HampsteadLord (talk) 03:07, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
Fix-It Felix Jr., was originally intended to be only from the movie, but in reality, that is left behind, it actually exists, but it started as the Wreck-It Ralph promotion.
Just people like you, deny the presence of the game in real life and not admit a related article, because you haven't seen or played it, I have played.
It deserves to be, like the other games from the other movies.
I defend this article, because I have proof of it, and in the words of Jules Verne: "Everything that man imagines becomes a reality" and video games aren't the exception. Fix-It Felix Jr. must be in the Post-fictional category, Because it has been seen hundreds of times by many people who hadn't imagined that this game really existed.
The Fox Hunt (1893) by Winslow Homer, Pennsylvania Academy of the Fine Arts.
Thank you for your contributions toward making Wikipedia a better and more accurate place.
I don't think I reviewed this. I definitely didn't intend to. The log suggests you reviewed it, perhaps unintentionally when tweaking the talk page? Anyway, not a big problem. The article was turned into a redirect to a cut'n'pasted copy, reverted, done again, and now I'm trying to start discussion. Don't know how well it will all go down, but fingers crossed. Lithopsian (talk) 17:28, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
Lithopsian Best not to have two articles on the same topic.PRehse (talk) 18:06, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
Redirect Ninja
Thanks for helping out during the NPP New Year Backlog Drive by reviewing redirects. Cheers! — Insertcleverphrasehere(or here) 20:11, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
Hello, PRehse. Please check your email; you've got mail! It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.
Hello! Just a reminder that {{WikiProject Film}} does not cover biography articles, such as actors, directors and filmmakers. This applies to all of the film task forces as well, which means that the American cinema task force does not include articles about American actors, directors and filmmakers, and consequently should not have the |film=yes parameter on the {{WikiProject United States}} banner. Thanks! Fortdj33 (talk) 17:58, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited State ownership, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Enterprise (check to confirm|fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ• Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:20, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
There are edits being made to a page by experts on the topic and you have repeatedly deleted the new and corrected content. Can you please advise as to how I can ensure that the content updates will not be undone. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.152.32.254 (talk) 02:26, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Hello please corrected, the name (Regency) should use capital letters, I want to move it but can not, can you move it to Banggai Regency Thank you. OktaRama2010 (talk) 13:58, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
OktaRama2010 Sure. For future reference just use the Move tab at the top right of the page although you might have to delete the target first.PRehse (talk) 14:21, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Hi - I didn't see a comment from you saying why you reverted my change on the QAI redirect. Could I get some idea of why the edit wasn't acceptable? Thanks. Faught (talk) 17:17, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
(talk page watcher)Faught, you changed the redirect to a disambiguation page. You added two entries, one to where the redirect points to, the other with no links at all. A DAB page is just a navigation tool. If an entry does not link to an existing Wikipedia article that has something about the title in it, then it doesn't belong. So in this case the second entry should have been deleted, leaving one entry. Since there is only one entry the page should redirect to that article. ~GBfan 17:30, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Thanks, exactly.PRehse (talk) 17:39, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for clarifying. I know I've seen entries on longer disambiguation pages that aren't linked anywhere. But perhaps in this case you'd be looking for at least two entries with links to justify having the disambiguation page? I had considered adding a page for the other QAI, but I didn't think I could demonstrate notability for it. Faught (talk) 19:03, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
If there are DAB pages that have entries that do not link to an article, those entries should be removed. Every entry on a DAB page must be linked to an article. ~GBfan 19:04, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Please don't restore copy-paste moves, as you did in this edit. It looks like you thought you were fixing it, but a look at the history should show that you reverted the fix. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 14:51, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
Hello PRehse, thank you for your efforts in reviewing new pages!The NPP backlog at the end of the drive with the number of unreviewed articles by creation date. Red is older than 90 days, orange is between 90 and 30 days old, and green is younger than 30 days.
Backlog update:
The new page backlog is currently at 3819 unreviewed articles, with a further 6660 unreviewed redirects.
We are very close to eliminating the backlog completely; please help by reviewing a few extra articles each day!
New Year Backlog Drive results:
We made massive progress during the recent four weeks of the NPP Backlog Drive, during which the backlog reduced by nearly six thousand articles and the length of the backlog by almost 3 months!
General project update:
ACTRIAL will end it's initial phase on the 14th of March. Our goal is to reduce the backlog significantly below the 90 day index point by the 14th of March. Please consider helping with this goal by reviewing a few additional pages a day.
Reviewing redirects is an important and necessary part of New Page Patrol. Please read the guideline on appropriate redirects for advice on reviewing redirects. Inappropriate redirects can be re-targeted or nominated for deletion at RfD.
If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. 20:32, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
Hi. I did indeed try to move Tanzanian cheetah, i.e. what you called the old page, to East African cheetah. But since there is a redirect in the latter, it was not possible to *move* content of this article. If you think it is not appropriate to cut and paste content from one to the other, then please tell me how to do this alternatively. -- BhagyaMani (talk) 11:50, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
BhagyaMani You need to first delete the target redirect and then use the Move tab at the top right of the page. I started the process. Please edit the article so that the naming is more consistent with the title.PRehse (talk) 12:09, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for speedy action!! Sure, will replace name asap. -- BhagyaMani (talk) 12:14, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
O please, can you perform a similar action on Sudan cheetah so that moving content to Northeast African cheetah will be possible?? This because the name Northeast African cheetah is more appropriate as this spp. occurs not only in Sudan. But latter currently also shows a redirect. -- BhagyaMani (talk) 12:32, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
BhagyaMani Done but I remember some pretty contentious argument about Lion sub species and hope this is less controversial.PRehse (talk) 12:53, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
So you followed the discussions there. Hope you enjoyed! Well, in the case of cheetah, the no. of accepted subspecies has been reduced to a far lesser extent than the lion ones, viz from 5 to 4. So I do not expect any controversy. Cheerio, -- BhagyaMani (talk) 13:27, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
I cant really see the difference in that sense with Tanzanian cheetah, since that species occurs in other countries than Tanzania. I guess those two ases are very comparable. Dan Koehl (talk) 16:21, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
Nice work with reviewing redirects — Zawl 13:02, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Hi, regarding the Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Congregation of the Holy Spirit, regardless if one article is copied from another, within Wikipedia I think theres still a copyvio problem, and tools lab Earwigs copyvio detector comes up with 94,7% probabilty, which made me think this has to be overlooked. Dan Koehl (talk) 16:27, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Special Edition New Page Patroller's Barnstar
For completing over 500 reviews during the 2018 NPP New Year Backlog Drive please accept this Special Edition Barnstar. Thank you for helping out at New Page Patrol! There is still work to do to meet our long term goals, so I hope you will continue your great work. Cheers! — Insertcleverphrasehere(or here) 02:44, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
Asymmetric Epicyclic Gears
For maintaining a streak of at least 100 reviews per week during the 2018 NPP New Year Backlog drive, you are awarded the asymmetric epicyclic gears. Well done! Keep up the good work. — Insertcleverphrasehere(or here) 02:44, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
I see you rated this article "Start": Some content but most readers would need more. See WP:ARTASS. It would be helpful if you could provide advice on the article's talk page (not here) on what would be needed to bring it up to "C": Still major gaps, but useful to a casual reader. Thanks, Aymatth2 (talk) 22:59, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
Howdy! I don't want to add to your already prodigious workload, but I wonder if, when reverting a copy/paste move over a redirect (as at Kailash Chandra Meghwal), it would be a good idea to drop a link to WP:RFPM into the edit summary. If I was sufficiently non-technical to try a copy/paste move (let alone repeatedly), I don't think I would have a clue where to turn when merely told "do a proper move instead":). Cheers! --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 09:50, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
With this edit you introduced errors into the page - specifically the automated/script-assisted edit used the page titles of domain reselling pages rather than the titles of the actual sources. In this case I fixed them by finding archived copies of the sources at the Internet Archive, but you should have done this (if archived copies are not available, remove the incorrect title and mark them as a permanent dead link). Remember that you are responsible for automated and script-assisted edits you make and other editors should not have to clean up after you. I have not looked at any other edits you've made to see if they need cleaning up as well. Thryduulf (talk) 22:09, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
Thanks, for the notification, but I am not the article creator - @Diptanshu Das: is? Either way I think this needs discussing at AFD. GiantSnowman 15:15, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
Good evening. Thank you for the improvements. Could you please explain the conceptuality of "bare reference", though? I see you have deployed a template/format which begins with "cite web" so should I always use this for online references and supply the additional publisher, date of publication and access date variables in every case?
Also, sorry, but I really don't understand "jaure at Soft Touch". What does that mean?
Thank you again. Alex. LXV (talk) 21:47, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
LXVBare references were filled with the linkrot tool - sometimes imperfectly but the idea is not to have jus a web link for the reference.PRehse (talk) 22:12, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
Okay, I agree it looks a lot better and potentially more information if all variables used. It's useful so I'll adopt it. Thank you very much for your help. Alex. LXV (talk) 22:17, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
These pages are not for commercial purpose endings
but for independence for both the artist and the record label
Thanks for your Time! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Akesc (talk • contribs) 20:00, 6 March 2018 (UTC)
Hi there, I don't want to revert your edit without checking with you first. The page contains many different transliterations of exactly the same surname, and all the templates are there to show the versions that are included. What's the rationale for removing all the templates and leaving just the one? Dr. Vogel (talk) 13:41, 7 March 2018 (UTC)
Hello PRehse. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Draft:Mohammad Bagher Sharif Tabatabayi, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: R3 inapplicable for page moves unless page also recently created; there's also community consensus to keep Draft->Mainspace redirects. Thank you. ~ Amory(u • t • c) 13:58, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
Can you help me to move page Olimpia Râmnicu Sărat to CSM Râmnicu Sărat? CSM Râmnicu Sărat is an old name of the club, but in the summer of 2017 the club returned to the old name and logo.
I proposed this change some time ago on the talk page and someone opposed, without any real reason and the move was canceled.
I would be grateful if you could help me.:) Rhinen
Hi
Let me introduce myself. I am Felix and I’m a novice in Wikipedia! I wrote an article recently, it’s a biography of a french-american journalist: Laura Haim. Now, I’m waiting for validation from wikipedian reviewer. Would you be able to help me? I have no idea how long it could take… https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Laura_Haim
Many thanks for your help.
Best
Thank you for rating this article. Per WP:ARTASS, I see you applied the rating "Start": Some meaningful content, but most readers would need more. It would be helpful if you could offer advice on the article's talk page as to the necessary edits to improve it to "C": Still major gaps, but useful to a casual reader. E-Stylus (talk) 18:45, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I saw that you deleted my page, can I ask why?
Tyler Summers (talk) 15:31, 20 March 2018 (UTC)
Tyler Summers I reviewed it but did not delete it. If you go to the page and look at the history you can see who did and why.PRehse (talk) 15:50, 20 March 2018 (UTC)
PRehse Sorry about that. I just saw the culprit. Forgive me for wasting your time.;) Tyler Summers (talk) 15:56, 20 March 2018 (UTC)
Apologies, I forgot how those reports work. -- Ynot? 15:19, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
Dear PRehse, Recently you've deleted the content in the article Tushara. Actually it had the meaning of the word's origin. Can you please reply on the reason of your modification of the content, whether the word is of any different origin having any different meaning?
Thank you | Ganeshprasadkp (talk) 03:19, 26 March 2018 (UTC)
Ganeshprasadkp You need to choose whether its a stub or a disambiguation page. The latter, which was more suitable is very specific about formatting.PRehse (talk) 16:42, 26 March 2018 (UTC)
Why? Regards --Rosenzweig (talk) 10:22, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
Rosenzweig Disambiguation page entries require a blue link.PRehse (talk) 10:26, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
Aha. I've looked it up and that seems to be indeed the case here - which is quite a difference to de.wp where I come from, there such a disambiguation page would be perfectly ok. Thanks for explaining. It would have been even better if you had explained your reason for reverting right away in the edit summary. Regards --Rosenzweig (talk) 10:59, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
Hello PRehse, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!
ACTRIAL:
ACTRIAL's six month experiment restricting new page creation to (auto)confirmed users ended on 14 March. As expected, a greatly increased number of unsuitable articles and candidates for deletion are showing up in the feed again, and the backlog has since increased already by ~30%. Please consider reviewing a few extra articles each day.
Paid editing
Now that ACTRIAL is inoperative pending discussion, please be sure to look for tell-tale signs of undisclosed paid editing. Contact the creator if appropriate, and submit the issue to WP:COIN if necessary.
Subject-specific notability guidelines
The box at the right contains each of the subject-specific notability guidelines, please review any that are relevant BEFORE nominating an article for deletion.
While patrolling articles, if you find an editor that is particularly competent at creating quality new articles, and that user has created more than 25 articles (rather than stubs), consider nominating them for the 'Autopatrolled' user right HERE.
News
The next issue Wikipedia's newspaper The Signpost has now been published after a long delay. There are some articles in it, including ACTRIAL wrap-up that will be of special interest to New Page Reviewers. Don't hesitate to contribute to the comments sections. The Signpost is one of the best ways to stay up date with news and new developments - please consider subscribing to it. All editors of Wikipedia and associated projects are welcome to submit articles on any topic for consideration by the The Signpost's editorial team for the next issue.
Peter, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gusman Kyrgyzbayev why did you say he hadn't competed at the highest level? He made the quarterfinals at last year's world championships and is currently ranked 7th in the world. Papaursa (talk) 00:42, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
Papaursa you are probably right. For the world championship i would have preferred medalling.PRehse (talk) 10:39, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
With a medal I'd say there should be no doubt, but if kickboxers need only be ranked in the top 10 why not judoka? There's lots of "world" titles out there, but I give some credence to the IJF and WTF titles and rankings. When I look at WP:NSPORT it appears that most, if not all, sports would say a top 8 finish in the world championships would be enough to show notability. That's a more lenient standard than WP:MANOTE, but for the IJF and WTF I'm inclined to bend some. It's still better than appearing in one top level game like a number of the sports (or simply appearing at the Olympics). Papaursa (talk) 19:17, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
It's been a long time since I was a particularly active patroller, but if it's still anything like I remember (and my recent work seems to indicate it is), it's thankless work. Thank you for doing such a great job of it, including of cleaning up after the messes I seem to somehow keep making for you. —Compassionate727(T·C) 17:56, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
@PRehse:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mike_Jackson_(fighter) Notability tagged a MMA Fighters page for notability issues. I believe this is incorrect should be removed asap. As we editors are collecting small paces of infomation into the page piece by piece slowly. The main reason why this was created (must create asap) to avoid confusion due to recent media coverage. (directing users to edit in Michael Jackson).
The tag should be waived, because "it seem to be worthily" on the page even if he got top tier 1 fight + there more improvement coming in slowly. 🥇BUSriderSFUser (talk • contribs) 19:09, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
Good afternoon! I came across the Wembley Arena article and immediately noticed its name, still not updated to the new SSE Arena name. I went into the talk page and saw the section regarding renaming the article, dating back to March 2017. From the looks of it, you were ready to make the move and started the process, but the article name is still not updated? Perhaps you forgot about it, so this could be a reminder - speaking of which, I also strongly support renaming the page. --MetrolandNW (talk) 12:40, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
MetrolandNW I am trying again but when it is moved you will need to edit it.PRehse (talk) 15:35, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
MetrolandNW And failed. Wembley Arena is the common name.PRehse (talk) 16:18, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
Oh, I believe the reason it fails is because The SSE Arena, Wembley already exists as a redirect. We'll need an administrator to perform it. --MetrolandNW (talk) 16:28, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
MetrolandNW An administrator disallowed the move by not deleting the redirect (see the The SSE Arena, Wembley history.PRehse (talk) 17:38, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I had missed the original redirect had pointed to Decentralized App, which is a proper target, as well as that page as a whole. Thanks for the edit. BerlinSight (talk) 13:43, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
For over 10,000 reviews over the last year. Thank you for all the reviewing work you have been doing. You are the main reason that our redirect backlog is even semi-reasonable. Cheers, — Insertcleverphrasehere(or here) 21:23, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
You recently deleted and redirected Aboriginal Australian mythology, advising (improper copy paste losses attribution - do correct move instead) .. wondering if you might assist and/or advise as to how to more properly make a move of this kind? Bruceanthro (talk) 22:13, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Er, what's going on here? I can't seem to follow this: was Yellow Rice a genuine article? What about Yellowed Rice? --Calton | Talk 00:40, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
Calton Not absolutely sure but it seems to be a messed up page move from a draft into article space. Yellowed Rice had some content, Yellow Rice just had some obscure tags.PRehse (talk) 11:10, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
Sorry about that... misread the edit. Must need coffee. Thanks for fixing my mistake. Onel5969TT me 11:28, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
Hi PRehse,
I've looked at the text of the the article deleted as a result of the 2016 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kim Last and this current version has addressed enough issues raised in that discussion to avoid the WP:G4 speedy deletion criteria. No prejudice for nomination under other deletion reasons.
I have no idea why "(Speedy deletion declined. Criterion G4 does not apply: Not previously been deleted via a deletion discussion (CSDH)}" appears in the edit summary - I was sure I added non-templated text in the speedy decline. Smarterer heads than mine might be able to explain that, but I can't.
That said, I still think this article may not pass any number of tests for inclusion as stand-alone article.
Pete AU aka --Shirt58 (talk) 10:34, 27 April 2018 (UTC)
Oh crumbs, maybe I got this all wrong - like when Kermit the Frog in his role as the in-house journalist for The Sesame Street News got things mixed up, and signed off with a sigh - but I can't find a more recent AfD discussion than the 2016 one. Was there a more recent one under a variant of that person's name?
Could you link that more recent AfD discussion?
Pete AU aka --Shirt58 (talk) 11:13, 27 April 2018 (UTC)
Shirt58 Damm that was me. 2016 sheesh.PRehse (talk) 11:18, 27 April 2018 (UTC)
Regarding your revert: when I changed it from a redirect into its current form, I intended it as a disambiguation page. Your comment does not address that argument, it just negates it. Please explain why you think it is "clearly" not a disambiguation page. As far as I can see, the earlier edits by User:Slashme inadvertently fixed some inconsistencies and marked it as a stub because I happened to neglect to add a {{disambiguation}} template. I don't think a new article about clearing banks is needed, as there is already Clearing (finance), Clearing house and similar articles. Just a disambiguation is needed here. –gpvos(talk) 17:03, 29 April 2018 (UTC)
How do I do a proper move? I'm talking about the page of Ambrogio Spinola. There are no other famous Ambrogio Spinola, so it makes sense to have the title as "Ambrogio Spinola" and not that super-long version.:Barjimoa (talk) 18:16, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
Barjimoa the target has to be deleted first - I will start the process.PRehse (talk) 18:21, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
thank you! Barjimoa (talk) 19:00, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
Hi Peter. From time to time you've assessed a few articles I've added in the WP templates for. Not sure if you're handling these as part of a wikiproject queue or as part of the NPP queue. If the latter, my rationale for leaving them blank is so to (hopefully) get an extra editor who is interested in the topic area to review and (possibly) improve things. Something to consider, but no problem if you continue. Cheers, ~Hydronium~Hydroxide~(Talk)~ 09:40, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
(talk page stalker) Personally, I don't mind you assessing them, I do so myself. The idea is that the maintenance queues will draw members from those WikiProjects to improve the article. I would ask, however, that you check what parameters a banner uses before adding that banner; you tend to add things like {{WikiProject United States|s&a=yes}}, when s&a is not a workgroup for WikiProject United States (indeed, it isn't for any project except Biography). You can find out which parameters are available by checking the documentation, which will be transcluded onto the template page. —Compassionate727(T·C) 12:44, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
Greetings! I saw that Wikimandia (who I have not pinged to avoid restarting a flame war) left a rather hostile message on your talk page yesterday about a speedy deletion tag you applied. I was going to comment, but you removed the message before I had the opportunity (which you have every right to do). I just wanted to let you know that Wikimandia's tone was inappropriate and that he was entirely out of line to threaten you. While a little more care may be advised in the future, it would also be inappropriate to argue that what happened was incompetence rather than an honest mistake. Hopefully you weren't bothered too much by it, although it would certainly be appropriate if you were. Anyway, best wishes! —Compassionate727(T·C) 13:01, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
Compassionate727 Not sure what caused that - made the mistake of engaging but in the end shrugged and let it go. No sweat.PRehse (talk) 13:18, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
He was basically irritated that you tagged for speedy deletion content that should have been moved to another project without notifying the correct creator. But yeah, the reaction was far disproportionate to the mistake. —Compassionate727(T·C) 13:20, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
Sorry if I edit-conflicted with you on the Walloon article. I'm finished for now. --Hegvald (talk) 19:14, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
I admire your ability to go through and make so many edits so comprehensively. Thank you for improving so many of my edits and half edits as I do NPP. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 17:16, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
Hello PRehse, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!
ACTRIAL:
WP:ACREQ has been implemented. The flow at the feed has dropped back to the levels during the trial. However, the backlog is on the rise again so please consider reviewing a few extra articles each day; a backlog approaching 5,000 is still far too high. An effort is also needed to ensure that older unsuitable older pages at the back of the queue do not get automatically indexed for Google.
Deletion tags
Do bear in mind that articles in the feed showing the trash can icon may have been tagged by inexperienced or non NPR rights holders. They require your further verification.
Backlog drive:
A backlog drive will take place from 10 through 20 June. Check out our talk page at WT:NPR for more details. NOTE: It is extremely important that we focus on quality reviewing. Despite our goal of reducing the backlog as much as possible, please do not rush while reviewing.
Editathons
There will be a large increase in the number of editathons in June. Please be gentle with new pages that obviously come from good faith participants, especially articles from developing economies and ones about female subjects. Consider using the 'move to draft' tool rather than bluntly tagging articles that may have potential but which cannot yet reside in mainspace.
Paid editing - new policy
Now that ACTRIAL is ACREQ, please be sure to look for tell-tale signs of undisclosed paid editing. Contact the creator if appropriate, and submit the issue to WP:COIN if necessary. There is a new global WMF policy that requires paid editors to connect to their adverts.
Subject-specific notability guidelines
The box at the right contains each of the subject-specific notability guidelines, please review any that are relevant BEFORE nominating an article for deletion.
Reviewers are requested to familiarise themselves with the new version of the notability guidelines for organisations and companies.
Not English
A common issue: Pages not in English or poor, unattributed machine translations should not reside in main space even if they are stubs. Please ensure you are familiar with WP:NPPNE. Check in Google for the language and content, tag as required, then move to draft if they do have potential.
News
Development is underway by the WMF on upgrades to the New Pages Feed, in particular ORES features that will help to identify COPYVIOs, and more granular options for selecting articles to review.
The next issue of The Signpost has been published. The newspaper is one of the best ways to stay up to date with news and new developments. between our newsletters.
if you look at the Talk you will see where I explained how the pronunciation of the つ of 空き (つき・tsuki) shifts to zu when in a combination much like keri becomes geri I posted an Okinawan list that has the furigana that demonstrates it becomes づ. I can, also, post pages from Japanese textbooks that include the furigana.
So "dis guy" who is anonymous: 2600:1700:fee0:f00:fa1e:dfff:fee1:5c9d
keeps changing it to the wrong pronunciation. I suppose I could leave a direct "See Talk on his page but it is anyone's page. After writing this, I did put an explanation, and I hope he/she/it/not-sure-but-don't-confine-me-to-your-hegemony reads it. I did mention the Talk discussion in both my edits.
Anyways, to avoid further edit-undo-edit-undo, would appreciate your input.
TheDoctorX (talk) 04:49, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
Of course, after posting this, the other anonymous poster stopped editing. Today, I added a picture from a textbook to the article's Talk page on the subject which should do it.
I know this is weird but I’m a new editor and don’t know how things work and you seem like you are pretty experienced .
I’m a fan of Johnny Taylor, Jr. and was thrilled when he posted a link to his Wikipedia page on Facebook. I noticed it was very sparse. I had never edited Wikipedia before but wanted to add to it and thought it a great opportunity to create pages for other comics I loved that didn’t have pages themselves in the future. I’m a nerd, I like that kinda stuff. I’m sad to see it nominated for deleted especially after I put so much time into learning Wikipedia working so much on this page (and others also). Also Johnny is a great comic and deserves one.
(talk page stalker)@WikiGodfromToronto: Hi. It would be helpful if you could point us (and preferabbly wikilink) to the full article, since there are a large number of people named Johnny Taylor and I can't seem to find the specific one we're talking about. Also, please sign your talk page posts using four tildes (~~~~) so that it's easier for us to tell who's writing. —Compassionate727(T·C) 20:09, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
Yeah my bad.PRehse (talk) 15:19, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
I've just fixed my typos here - we all make mistakes! DuncanHill (talk) 15:20, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
Hiya, a heads up re: : the WikiProject banner automatically checks whether the article is a redirect and dynamically assesses its parameters as redirects when left blank. Hardcoding the parameter "Redirect" only makes it harder to maintain proper classification when the redirect becomes a prose article as no one would be automatically prompted to update the params. (not watching, please {{ping}}) czar 17:44, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
Hello PRehse, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!
We can see the light at the end of the tunnel: there are currently 2900 unreviewed articles, and 4000 unreviewed redirects.
Announcing the Backlog Elimination Drive!
As a final push, we have decided to run a backlog elimination drive from the 20th to the 30th of June.
Reviewers who review at least 50 articles or redirects will receive a Special Edition NPP Barnstar: . Those who review 100, 250, 500, or 1000 pages will also receive tiered awards: , , , .
Please do not be hasty, take your time and fully review each page. It is extremely important that we focus on quality reviewing.
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Myish Bogdasarov, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Armenian (check to confirm|fix with Dab solver).
Interqwark The article was assessed as Start (see the talk page) and it should be consistent - one had to change. I believe the project assessment was correct.PRehse (talk) 08:56, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I'm Polyamorph. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Camp Taloali, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.
For completing over 250 reviews during the 2018 June Backlog Drive please accept this Special Edition Barnstar. Thank you for helping out at New Page Patrol and keep up the good work, Cheers! — Insertcleverphrasehere(or here) 01:46, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
Howdy! Just wanted to respond the the speedy template you left on my page. On the last AfD redirecting was specifically mentioned by the closer, so I don't think a speedy tag for having been previously deleted through AfD is correct. (Note, since the page has been deleted already, I wasn't able to check if someone else expanded it beyond a redirect in the meantime). Thanks! {{u|zchrykng}}{T|C} 19:30, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for the notice! But, I'm reviewing the page for a speedy deletion and need some help from you. I started a discussion at Talk:Domestic biogas plant. Just need you to walk me through what the violation entails. Sancho 22:04, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
@Username: Hi PRehse. I'm working on this page - when I started it a few days ago, I thought I would be including the info on commemorative coins on the page. However, I've since found out that other editors have already done the work, on the pages for each of the individual coin denominations. So, I think this page is best suited as an "overview" page, with links to each of the denomination articles. I think it would be best to just entirely take out the tables I had started. Given that the work has been done already, there's no need to duplicate it on this page, and if we did for all the denominations, this page would just be unwieldy - way too long. Mr Serjeant Buzfuz (talk) 17:18, 9 July 2018 (UTC)
Hi PRhense - tell me what I missed in reviewing the page. I thought it was in need of more third party sources and was borderline non-notable for that reason. But I gave it the benefit of the doubt in passing it as reviewed. I'm certainly willing to learn, so any advice will be appreciated (and acted on). The article has since been deleted as non-notable by another editor. Thanks, Geoff|Who, me? 15:36, 26 July 2018 (UTC)
Glane23 Your review was fine it was a judgement call. I had been watching it with the original author deleting the tags without improvement. I expected one of the more regular reviewers to give thir input whether it should be deleted outright. My unreview was to give it some more visability for a little longer.PRehse (talk) 16:57, 26 July 2018 (UTC)
Graphs are unavailable due to technical issues. There is more info on Phabricator and on MediaWiki.org.
Chart of the New Pages Patrol backlog for the past 6 months. (Purge)
Hello PRehse, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!
June backlog drive
Overall the June backlog drive was a success, reducing the last 3,000 or so to below 500. However, as expected, 90% of the patrolling was done by less than 10% of reviewers. Since the drive closed, the backlog has begun to rise sharply again and is back up to nearly 1,400 already. Please help reduce this total and keep it from raising further by reviewing some articles each day.
New technology, new rules
New features are shortly going to be added to the Special:NewPagesFeed which include a list of drafts for review, OTRS flags for COPYVIO, and more granular filter preferences. More details can be found at this page.
Probationary permissions: Now that PERM has been configured to allow expiry dates to all minor user rights, new NPR flag holders may sometimes be limited in the first instance to 6 months during which their work will be assessed for both quality and quantity of their reviews. This will allow admins to accord the right in borderline cases rather than make a flat out rejection.
Current reviewers who have had the flag for longer than 6 months but have not used the permissions since they were granted will have the flag removed, but may still request to have it granted again in the future, subject to the same probationary period, if they wish to become an active reviewer.
Editathons
Editathons will continue through August. Please be gentle with new pages that obviously come from good faith participants, especially articles from developing economies and ones about female subjects. Consider using the 'move to draft' tool rather than bluntly tagging articles that may have potential but which cannot yet reside in mainspace.
The Signpost
The next issue of the monthly magazine will be out soon. The newspaper is an excellent way to stay up to date with news and new developments between our newsletters. If you have special messages to be published, or if you would like to submit an article (one about NPR perhaps?), don't hesitate to contact the editorial team here.
Hello PRehse, I noticed that you added the WP:BLP tag to the talk page for the Harry Manning biography. He's been dead since 1974. Did I overlook something? The article does mention that he had a daughter, born circa 1940, so it is entirely possible that she is alive. She was named in his New York Times obit so it's reliably sourced.BlueRiband► 04:35, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
Blue Riband No I overlooked something - fixed.PRehse (talk) 11:00, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
When I noticed that I redirected to Far Eastern Leopard, i.e. with a capital L, I moved contents to Far Eastern leopard, i.e. with a small l, assuming that wikipedia's policy is to use subspecies's names not capitalized. Please help: which of the two is the correct one? -- BhagyaMani (talk) 09:42, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
BhagyaMani The problem isn't the name but the copy paste which looses attribution. You need to make a proper move instead. In this case I think by request since the current name was long established.PRehse (talk) 09:51, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
Yes indeed: the name Far Eastern leopard is long established for this subspecies, whereas the name Northeast Asian leopard has to date NOT been used in any scientific source. I take it, you have far more experience in making such moves than I do, obviously. Would you move it then, properly? -- BhagyaMani (talk) 10:35, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
BhagyaMani It is complicated since there is a recently installed move protection on that page. Please go to WP:RM#CM and follow the instructions for a single page move. I suspect you are better placed to give a good reason than I.PRehse (talk) 10:50, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for your advise!! Would this list provide sufficient evidence, in your experience?
{{subst:requested move|Far Eastern leopard|reason=The name "Far Eastern leopard" is long established for this subspecies, along with "Amur leopard", whereas the name "Northeast Asian leopard" has to date NOT been used in any scientific source. The following list shows only a selection of several books and articles using this name in the title:}}
Miquelle, D.G., Arzhanova, T.D. and Solkin, V., 1996. A Recovery Plan for Conservation of the Far Eastern Leopard: results of an international conference held in Vladivostok. Russia. 81pp.
Augustine, J., Miquelle, D.G. and Korkishko, V.G., 1996. Preliminary results of the Far Eastern Leopard Project: implication for conservation and management. Zov Taigi 4(27): 6-11.
Pikunov, D.G., Abramov, V.K., Korkishko, V.G., Aramiliev, V.V., Arzhanova, T.D., Karakin, V.P., Fomenko, P.V., Yudin, V.G., Lukarevskiy, V.S. and Nikolaev, I.G. 1999. Strategy for the conservation of the Far Eastern leopard in Russia. Moscow: World Wildlife Fund.
Uphyrkina, O., Miquelle, D., Quigley, H., Driscoll, C. and O'Brien, S.J. 2002. Conservation genetics of the Far Eastern leopard (Panthera pardus orientalis). Journal of heredity 93(5): 303-311.
Kostyria, A.V., Skorodelov, A.S., Miquelle, D.G., Aramilev, V.V. and McCullough, D. 2003. Results of camera trap survey of far eastern leopard population in southwest Primorski Krai, winter 2002–2003. Wildlife Conservation Society, Institute of Sustainable Use of Nature Resources, University of California (Berkeley), Vladivostok, Russia.
Aramilev, V.V., Kostyria, A.V., Sokolov, S.A., Rybin, A.N., Mc-Cullough, D. and Miquelle, D. 2010. Monitoring of Far eastern leopard population (Panthera pardus orientalis) with photo traps. In Proceedings of International Conference «The Amur Tiger in Northeast Asia: Planning for the 21st Century. pp. 345-351.
Hebblewhite, M., Miquelle, D.G., Murzin, A.A., Aramilev, V.V. and Pikunov, D.G. 2011. Predicting potential habitat and population size for reintroduction of the Far Eastern leopards in the Russian Far East. Biological Conservation 144(10): 2403-2413.
Spitzen, V.V., Miquelle, D.G., Darman, Y.A., Aramilev, V.V., Hötte, M., Bereznyuk, S.L., Laptev, A.A., Aramileva, T.S., Myslenkov, A.A., Kerley, L.L. and Salkina, G. 2012. A Program for Reintroduction of The Far Eastern Leopard Into Southern Sixhote-Alin, Primorskii Krai, Russian Far East. Amur Leopard Reintroduction. The Amur Leopard and Tiger Alliance, The Amur Leopard and Tiger Alliance, pp. 88-106.
Sulikhan, N.S., Gilbert, M., Blidchenko, E.Y., Naidenko, S.V., Ivanchuk, G.V., Gorpenchenko, T.Y., Alshinetskiy, M.V., Shevtsova, E.I., Goodrich, J.M., Lewis, J.C. and Goncharuk, M.S. 2018. Canine Distemper Virus in a Wild Far Eastern Leopard (Panthera pardus orientalis). Journal of Wildlife Diseases 54(1): 170-174.
BhagyaMani Try it.PRehse (talk) 13:09, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
Hi PRehse. I tried it. Six people (only) replied. Consensus is to NOT keep the new name and title Northeast Asian leopard. Four people opt for a revert to the previous title Amur leopard, which is fine with me, as this name has been established for decades in scientific lit. I hope it will not be necessary to request another move back to this previous title? -- BhagyaMani (talk) 08:20, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
hello, pls note I am fan of prabhu mundkur. I created his page based on the newspaper articles that I got from internet. I removed the template as I was not aware that it should not be removed. Pls
check the reference links on prabhu mundkur page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kingvinvin (talk • contribs) 10:01, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Hi, PRehse - would you be so kind as to be a bit more specific regarding your advice? I've been mentoring SNAAAAKE!! and it would prove helpful to me if I knew precisely to what you were referring. You linked to his contribution history which is quite lengthy, so if you wouldn't mind, I really need specifics. Atsme📞📧 18:21, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Atsme The warning was triggered by repetitively Categorizing Draft articles. I explained that we should only categorize articles but it seemed (Yes I know we should assume good faith) that he was trying to circumvent another issue.PRehse (talk) 18:33, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Oh, Ok - thank you. I think he was prepping everything for a simple move to article space, and may not have realized the category issue. Thank you for the speedy response. Atsme📞📧 18:35, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Atsme The Draft in question had been moved out of article space which is why I noticed it. Thanks for the mentoring effort.PRehse (talk) 18:49, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for your recent work reviewing redirects and dab pages (and articles too if you did, I didn't check all your reviews). Redirect reviewing is one of the less publicised bits of NPP, but necessary and appreciated. Keep up the good work. Cheers, — Insertcleverphrasehere(or here) 04:51, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
Salam. In the "External links" section "Do not specify social media accounts" is forbidden Why do you have Donald Trump in the "External links" section? Why do you regret the change in the "External links" section of the "Rovshan Abdullaoglu" article? (translate.google.com/#tr/en) --Samral (talk) 21:31, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
Hii,i am Vikas from username Tiktok111. I am new volunteers to wikipedia an I am trying to solve error on one article name Yash shah(Rubber Man)
So please help in solving error from that page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tiktok111 (talk • contribs) 15:18, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
*Treker Actually I didn't - there was one I could not fix but no worries there are at least two editors who will get to it quickly.PRehse (talk) 09:56, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for all the ones you fixed either way.:)★Trekker (talk) 09:58, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
Ignoring is not the solution, i will ask this from an admin.— Bukhari(Talk!) 03:56, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
Do you consider the Aikido Journal to be a reliable source (as defined by WP)? I know I've used it as a reference, but I don't know if it's a RS. I usually give a pass to Black Belt magazine despite it's gross failure in topics like Frank Dux, but I look carefully to see that the content is not self-submitted/promotional. It's difficult to find good martial arts sources. Papaursa (talk) 18:56, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
Papaursa Very reliable it's origins are in AikiNews which in both Japanese and English versions was under good editorial control. The main driver, now deceased, was a trained historian with very respected integrity.PRehse (talk) 19:38, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
I thought you'd say that, but I wanted confirmation. Stanley Pranin was well-regarded. I'm wrestling with the Hakkō-ryū deletion discussion. The Aikido Journal article is an interview plus a brief synopsis of the art, so their support isn't as strong as I'd like. The Black Belt articles seem to support notability, but the final source mentioned is a little over a page in a book called "Taiho-Jutsu: The Art of Arrests". The interesting part is that the section says the art is "almost non-existent" "in terms of law enforcement", so why is it in the book and how much notability does it really show? This looks weak to me, but not as blatantly as some and I'm inclined to give it a pass. I think my reaction was as negative as it was because of the argument that it was such an obvious keep and that the nominator obviously didn't do his job. I don't see this as a slam-dunk. I know I shouldn't let personalities influence my editing, but I'm only human (depending on who you ask). Papaursa (talk) 21:46, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
More information List of other useful scripts for New Page Reviewing ...
List of other useful scripts for New Page Reviewing
Twinkle provides a lot of the same functionality as the page curation tools, and some reviewers prefer to use the Twinkle tools for some/all tasks. It can be activated simply in the gadgets section of 'preferences'. There are also a lot of options available at the Twinkle preferences panel after you install the gadget.
In terms of other gadgets for NPR, HotCat is worth turning on. It allows you to easily add, remove, and change categories on a page, with name suggestions.
MoreMenu also adds a bunch of very useful links for diagnosing and fixing page issues.
User:Equazcion/ScriptInstaller.js(info): Installing scripts doesn't have to be complicated. Go to your common.js and copy importScript( 'User:Equazcion/ScriptInstaller.js' ); into an empty line, now you can install all other scripts with the click of a button from the script page! (Note you need to be at the ".js" page for the script for the install button to appear, not the information page)
User:TheJosh/Scripts/NewPagePatrol.js(info): Creates a scrolling new pages list at the left side of the page. You can change the number of pages shown by adding the following to the next line on your common.js page (immediately after the line importing this script): npp_num_pages=20; (Recommended 20, but you can use any number from 1 to 50).
User:Primefac/revdel.js(info): Is requesting revdel complicated and time consuming? This script helps simplify the process. Just have the Copyvio source URL and go to the history page and collect your diff IDs and you can drop them into the script Popups and it will create a revdel request for you.
User:Evad37/rater.js(info): A fantastic tool for adding WikiProject templates to article talk pages. If you add: rater_autostartNamespaces = 0; to the next line on your common.js, the prompt will pop up automatically if a page has no Wikiproject templates on the talk page (note: this can be a bit annoying if you review redirects or dab pages commonly).
Close
Hello PRehse, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!
The New Page Feed currently has 2700 unreviewed articles, up from just 500 at the start of July. For a while we were falling behind by an average of about 40 articles per day, but we have stabilised more recently. Please review some articles from the back of the queue if you can (Sort by: 'Oldest' at Special:NewPagesFeed), as we are very close to having articles older than one month.
Project news
The New Page Feed now has a new "Articles for Creation" option which will show drafts instead of articles in the feed, this shouldn't impact NPP activities and is part of the WMF's AfC Improvement Project.
As part of this project, the feed will have some larger updates to functionality next month. Specifically, ORES predictions will be built in, which will automatically flag articles for potential issues such as vandalism or spam. Copyright violation detection will also be added to the new page feed. See the projects's talk page for more info.
Some unsuitable new articles can be best reviewed by moving them to the draft space, but reviewers need to do this carefully and sparingly. It is most useful for topics that look like they might have promise, but where the article as written would be unlikely to survive AfD. If the article can be easily fixed, or if the only issue is a lack of sourcing that is easily accessible, tagging or adding sources yourself is preferable. If sources do not appear to be available and the topic does not appear to be notable, tagging for deletion is preferable (PROD/AfD/CSD as appropriate). See additional guidance at WP:DRAFTIFY.
If the user moves the draft back to mainspace, or recreates it in mainspace, please do not re-draftify the article (although swapping it to maintain the page history may be advisable in the case of copy-paste moves). AfC is optional except for editors with a clear conflict of interest.
Articles that have been created in contravention of our paid-editing-requirements or written from a blatant NPOV perspective, or by authors with a clear COI might also be draftified at discretion.
The best tool for draftification is User:Evad37/MoveToDraft.js(info). Kindly adapt the text in the dialogue-pop-up as necessary (the default can also be changed like this). Note that if you do not have the Page Mover userright, the redirect from main will be automatically tagged as CSD R2, but in some cases it might be better to make this a redirect to a different page instead.
The Page Mover userright can be useful for New Page Reviewers; occasionally page swapping is needed during NPR activities, and it helps avoid excessive R2 nominations which must be processed by admins. Note that the Page Mover userright has higher requirements than the NPR userright, and is generally given to users active at Requested Moves. Only reviewers who are very experienced and are also very active reviewers are likely to be granted it solely for NPP activities.
Hey there, it's been a while. Just popping by to let you know that I declined your G4 nomination of this page - while it's probably still deletable, both the content and sources are sufficiently different from the last-deleted version to require a new AFD (obviously you can't see the deleted version, so no harm no foul on your part!). Hope all's well with you and your dojo. All the best, Yunshui雲水 10:08, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
Hi PRehse. I saw a note about content being written like an advertisement on the article Non-compromised Pendulum which I made. Would you mind giving please some recommendations on what should be rewritten so that it doesn't look like an advertisement, as I wrote the article based on the sources and did not mean to make an ad piece.Thanks. —Aspireforintelligence (talk) 08:54, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
Hi, just thought I should let you know that, per Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2018 September 25#Joseph Kropschot, I undeleted an article you had tagged for speedy deletion as a re-creation of a previously deleted page (WP:CSD#G4). I will remove the speedy deletion tag, but I do believe it should be nominated for a thirdsecond AfD on the grounds that the notability issue is still not settled. – Athaenara ✉ 02:14, 26 September 2018 (UTC) 09:04, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
Thanks, Athaenara, this is fair. By the way I see only one AFD plus one speedy deletion, not two AFDs in the past AFAICT. To PRehse, I would hope you would give the new article and the new-ish editor (around for a longish time but with only about 50 edits) a break for a little while, so the upcoming pro fight plus coverage happens, per discussion in the deletion review. Because I think they reasonably waited until reasons expressed in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joseph Kropschot no longer applied, then re-created article in good faith. I am not myself very much conversant exactly upon notability standards for athletes, so beyond this I dunno. Thanks. --Doncram (talk) 03:49, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
Why Did you put a redirect on 2019 in television cause it's too soon 68.103.78.155 (talk) 15:55, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
Why Did you Put A Redirect on 2019 in television Because it's too soon. 68.103.78.155 (talk) 16:08, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
Why Didn't you answer me yesterday Why did you put a redirect on 2019 in television too soon 68.103.78.155 (talk) 23:54, 3 October 2018 (UTC)
Why Did you remove the rest of the article For Look it's almost 8 Weeks towards the new year the rest of the article counts. 68.103.78.155 (talk) 14:58, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
you should not have a collection of redlinks - only include articles.PRehse (talk) 15:08, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
Why is it a little too soon. 68.103.78.155 (talk) 16:21, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
1 would have waited until there were a few more blue links. Even now there is only one.PRehse (talk) 16:30, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
Hi! I know you're probably busy, but this is my first time writing a full article and I'd appreciate some pointers. How do I fix the orphan issue? Which external links would you recommend be removed? Also, are there any major things I should try to avoid for future articles (to save time)? I just want to learn as much as possible because I want to continue writing and editing articles.
Thanks for your help!! -Natalie
Natsportelli12 (talk) 14:04, 3 October 2018 (UTC)
Natsportelli12 The orphan issue means there are no links to other articles from outside. The subject is not mentioned elsewhere.PRehse (talk) 14:15, 3 October 2018 (UTC)
What are your thoughts on him meeting WP:GNG? I haven't looked carefully, but it looks possible. Papaursa (talk) 01:22, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
Papaursa I did not think so. The main reason was the lack of notability vis a vis martial arts but I did look at the sources and saw nothing that stood out.PRehse (talk) 09:09, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
- We just added few proofs a few days back to our existing article. "Varmakkalai" is an dying ancient martial art which has been taught and its medical system were properly used to treat people by Aasan R. Rajendran. The organizations "The Hindu" and "The New Indian Express" are top news papers of India(2 articles were quoted in our wiki page), following to it "Dinamalar" is one of the top South India news media (Please consider translating those pages from our native language Tamil to English). Request not to consider the article for deletion as Aasan R. Rajendran has dedicated his life to save this art which is yet to get the limelight in media due to its native and unadulterated look. This Wikipedia page would be a small resource for people to know about the truth about his service to this martial art/medical system. Please consider.
Please stop your disruptive editing.What you doing sir(madam), is extreme measures to destroy my article by any means, I see my article didn't let you sleep. It is seriously look like harassment toward me and my article directly from you 107.242.117.3 (talk) 15:46, 10 October 2018 (UTC)
Hi PRehse: since you just placed a redirect in Acinonyx jubatus jubatus to East-Southern African cheetah, I would like to comment: there is NOT A SINGLE publication using 'East-Southern African cheetah' in conjunction with the Latin name, hence this is far from being a commonly used name!! Just have a look at the 190 references listed in Cheetah#References. The old name used for this subspecies in a few pre-2000 scientific articles was 'South African cheetah'. So I consider it misleading that a new name has been invented, pretending that this is a common one. I'm sure you are more familiar with wikipedia's practise re use of page names? -- BhagyaMani (talk) 10:25, 11 October 2018 (UTC)
BhagyaMani Yes but this was clearly a duplicate article. The correct action is a page move (not copy paste).PRehse (talk) 10:34, 11 October 2018 (UTC)
I did not intend to duplicate the article. Can you then move this page to South African cheetah? This page currently contains a redirect. -- BhagyaMani (talk) 11:00, 11 October 2018 (UTC)
BhagyaManiConsidering the history of big cat articles the move might gather opposition. Best option is to request a move outlining your reasons. (See WP:RM).PRehse (talk) 11:13, 11 October 2018 (UTC)
Before I do that, I would appreciate your opinion, or rather: your definition of 'common name'. And then: do you think that I'm the one who misunderstood this term? Can wikipedians invent names and pretend they are common? -- BhagyaMani (talk) 11:48, 11 October 2018 (UTC)
BhagyaManiYou are probably right and if you make the case others will see it too. It is hard to give a clear definition of Common but amount of usage is a good indicator.PRehse (talk) 11:59, 11 October 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for reassuring!! Then I'll compile a list of pubs using this name. Will you participate in the discussion , or are you not allowed to as admin?? -- BhagyaMani (talk) 12:09, 11 October 2018 (UTC)
I wonder whether we are being stalked? -- BhagyaMani (talk) 17:05, 11 October 2018 (UTC) You may not have received this improperly formatted {{u}} at Talk:Cheetah#Uncertainty_over_subspecies? -- BhagyaMani (talk) 13:54, 12 October 2018 (UTC)
I’m going to put some of these back in. “Do not remove red links unless you are certain that Wikipedia should not have an article on the subject” (Wikipedia:Red link). I find it hard to believe that the North Carolina Historical Commissioh and the Independent Media Institute, among others, are not worthy of articles. deisenbe (talk) 13:37, 12 October 2018 (UTC)
REGENCY or Georgian boxing page deleted even after adding references. Why am I not surprised you consider Aikido a martial art and I shall restart the page whether you like it or not. Stick to your ancient Peruvian arts and I shall stick to the first British form of unarmed combat started by Figg. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dr Nobody (talk • contribs) 17:07, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Fast Ferries. Since you had some involvement with the Fast Ferries redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Lourakis (talk) 16:27, 20 October 2018 (UTC)
Hi there, I was wondering why you changed the class of my article Today is Friday from a B class to a Start class. I only ask as you gave no justification. I would really appreciate some feedback.
Graphs are unavailable due to technical issues. There is more info on Phabricator and on MediaWiki.org.
Chart of the New Pages Patrol backlog for the past 6 months.
Hello PRehse, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!
Backlog
As of 21 October 2018[update], there are 3650 unreviewed articles and the backlog now stretches back 51 days.
Community Wishlist Proposal
There is currently an ongoing discussion regarding the drafting of a Community Wishlist Proposal for the purpose of requesting bug fixes and missing/useful features to be added to the New Page Feed and Curation Toolbar.
Please join the conversation as we only have until 29 October to draft this proposal!
Project updates
ORES predictions are now built-in to the feed. These automatically predict the class of an article as well as whether it may be spam, vandalism, or an attack page, and can be filtered by these criteria now allowing reviewers to better target articles that they prefer to review.
There are now tools being tested to automatically detect copyright violations in the feed. This detector may not be accurate all the time, though, so it shouldn't be relied on 100% and will only start working on new revisions to pages, not older pages in the backlog.
The linked content primarily covers the area for which the subject of the article is notable.
Official links (if any) are provided to give the reader the opportunity to see what the subject says about itself. These links are normally exempt from the links normally to be avoided, but they are not exempt from the restrictions on linking.
Normally, only one official link is included. If the subject of the article has more than one official website, then more than one link may be appropriate, under a very few limited circumstances....
More than one official link should be provided only when the additional links provide the reader with significant unique content and are not prominently linked from other official websites. For example, if the main page of the official website for an author contains a link to the author's blog and Twitter feed, then it is not appropriate to provide links to all three. Instead, provide only the main page of the official website in this situation.
Social media links should only be deleted to zero if a link to one is included in the subject's official website, if one such official website exists.
I'm referencing your edit on article Shavkat Rakhimov in this case btw. DA1 (talk) 15:23, 26 October 2018 (UTC)
Hi PRehse!
I found you in the Wikiproject Boxing, would you mind please reviewing the Draft:Non-compromised Pendulum. I have included several new recent reviews of the book and improved the article. Thankfully, Aspireforintelligence (talk) 20:09, 26 October 2018 (UTC)
Hello, a few days ago you placed some edit tags on the article Human sexual promiscuity. I came across the article as a member of the New Pages Patrol. In particular I agree with your concern about the article being an argumentative essay. I wonder if the article is a candidate for deletion. If you have the time, take a look at the article again and let me know your thoughts; one of us could start the AfD process as needed. Thanks. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 18:56, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Never mind, someone else has redirected it because it was deemed a repeat of a section in an existing article. Thanks. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 16:28, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
Hey, I noticed that you reviewed Many Uses of Computers. However, almost every single reference is citing Wikipedia. I'd also argue that it's a case of a content fork. As such, I'm going to nominate this for deletion. Cheers, Enwebb (talk) 21:03, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
May I ask why you reverted my revision of Fontanka to a disambig page, to allow choice between the river and the investigative group, which is significant though as yet without its deserved page? Cossaxx (talk) 08:03, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Hi PRhense. I'm not sure why you changed this disambig page to a redirect? I saw the term ropery and searched it. But it was not being used to refer to ropewalking. Why would we direct readers to only one usage? FloridaArmy (talk) 16:49, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello my friend. Can I recover the page for Raul Cătinaş? He is 2-time K-1 finalist (in the Final 16). I think will do it, it should pass. Is it ok for you, please? He is also returned to the ring, and Thom Harinck named him as the hardest hitter. .karellian-24 (talk) 19:47, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
I presume this is on your watchlist, but if not, I've started a merge request. This is simply an ethnic nationalist fork so far as I can see. Doug Wellertalk 13:31, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
Hi PRhense. I want to ask you for some advice. i consider splitting content into yearly-articles because the article starting to be too long. I don't want to be ban by a mod who will think i do vandalism. KINGFEDORQc (talk) 20:48, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
KINGFEDORQc As in 2016 in BRACE - that makes sense for the reasons given. No chance of band for that.PRehse (talk) 21:02, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
The Civility Barnstar
Hello. I took notice that you reviewed my first draft article, which I am surprised by. While I will say that I have put in a considerable amount of effort before submission, at the same time, I do think there can be a few more improvements to refine it, such as a few more citations and a paragraph or two.
Thank you and kind regards. CrimsonShark (talk) 21:49, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
I saw you deleted the reference to the Ordnance Survey in Woodstock, Pembrokeshire, the standard reference for UK locations, accessible from the coordinates at the top of the article, but did not say why in an edit summary. I'd be interested to know why you thought it unacceptable. Thanks, Tony. Tony Holkham(Talk) 19:57, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
I am creator of the article "Bishandot". It was noticed that you recently deleted its content. I reverted it but for your kind information, all the content was according to the topic. You were saying it "Fluff for encyclopedia" because you didn't know anything about that topic. Kindly don't interfere in my article as I created it with great effort by work day and night. And for help, I am working with Senior Editor of Wikipedia named "Freya" to improve this article. Your contribution with me wil be greatly appreciated.
Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by Raja Atizaz Ahmed Kiyani (talk • contribs) 10:52, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
Hi there,
I require help from an administrator. The page that already exists "Ancient Aesthetics" is my page. I thought it was moved by a fellow administrator back to my sandbox. I am attempting to post a modified version of the article based on editing suggestions. Let me know if you can help. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kboro089 (talk • contribs) 14:31, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
Yeh Mader chod hai. Yeh kuch nahi Kar sakta. Kisi administrator se baat Karo. Terimaakitou (talk) 09:35, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
I can see that article is going to be a time sink. Good luck.:) EnPassant (talk) 18:20, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
Graphs are unavailable due to technical issues. There is more info on Phabricator and on MediaWiki.org.
Chart of the New Pages Patrol backlog for the past 6 months.
Hello PRehse,
Community Wishlist Survey – NPP needs you – Vote NOW
Community Wishlist Voting takes place 16 to 30 November for the Page Curation and New Pages Feed improvements, and other software requests. The NPP community is hoping for a good turnout in support of the requests to Santa for the tools we need. This is very important as we have been asking the Foundation for these upgrades for 4 years.
If this proposal does not make it into the top ten, it is likely that the tools will be given no support at all for the foreseeable future. So please put in a vote today.
We are counting on significant support not only from our own ranks, but from everyone who is concerned with maintaining a Wikipedia that is free of vandalism, promotion, flagrant financial exploitation and other pollution.
With all 650 reviewers voting for these urgently needed improvements, our requests would be unlikely to fail. See also The Signpost Special report: 'NPP: This could be heaven or this could be hell for new users – and for the reviewers', and if you are not sure what the wish list is all about, take a sneak peek at an article in this month's upcoming issue of The Signpost which unfortunately due to staff holidays and an impending US holiday will probably not be published until after voting has closed.
Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. — Insertcleverphrasehere(or here)18:37, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
Hi! I saw your notification about this. Could you expand a bit? A url for the apparent source would help, for example. Because if you've shown that it was originally copied from elsewhere into Economic inequality before the split, then we'll have to clean that up too. Right now the content has been moved out of that page, and then history-deleted as A10 by RHaworth (I hope to learn in time why that was the right approach in this situation). Regards, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 12:20, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
Justlettersandnumbers I tried recovering the offending url but since the article was deleted that was impossible. In the copyvio speedy deletion tag the offending url is revealed by the copyvio report. In this case it was a blog with over 90% match. I am rushing out but will try to look further later.PRehse (talk) 12:36, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
I have provided refrences to claims. PRehse, you are requested to please review and improve what you can. I have added 12 references which are enough to verify that this village exists. I will add others soon. As Spinningspark told me that I should refer someone other than me to remove maintenance templates. PRehse, Please remove maintenance templates.Raja Atizaz Ahmed Kiyani (talk) 15:32, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––– —Preceding unsigned comment added by Zeinalmaha994 (talk • contribs) 21:19, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
Dear PRehse,
Hope this message finds you well.
I am working on a page that was recently deleted before called 'Rebecca Odeh'. I am working on fixing the page in Drafts and have a couple of questions to ask:
1) Can I reuse the name Rebecca Odeh (Fitness Public Figure)?
2) Can I use the same name as the deleted page or will I have to change the name of the Wikipedia page?
3) Can I reuse the same material from a deleted page if I have verified the links I used for citation and removed all sources of publicity?
4) Where can I find a guidelines document for rules and regulations for pages on Wikipedia?
5) Is there a page length for any Wikipedia page in general?
I would love to learn more about using Wikipedia as I am intrigued with editing pages.
I appreciate your kind attention to my message.
Best Regards
Zee Zeinalmaha994 (talk) 21:28, 18 November 2018 (UTC) 18 November 2018
Hello, PRehse. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
. Those who review 100, 250, 500, or 1000 pages will also receive tiered awards: 
, 
, 
, 
.
Please stop your disruptive editing.What you doing sir(madam), is extreme measures to destroy my article by any means, I see my article didn't let you sleep. It is seriously look like harassment toward me and my article directly from you 107.242.117.3 (talk) 15:46, 10 October 2018 (UTC)
-- BhagyaMani (talk) 17:05, 11 October 2018 (UTC) You may not have received this improperly formatted {{u}} at Talk:Cheetah#Uncertainty_over_subspecies ? -- BhagyaMani (talk) 13:54, 12 October 2018 (UTC)
