Loading AI tools
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:Oronsay. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 |
   Please join us for these virtual events:
| ||
|
|
 |
The Original Barnstar |
| Thanks so much for your work - including that on Royal Society fellows for Women in Red - Brilliant Victuallers (talk) 09:31, 19 February 2019 (UTC) |
.jpg)
Thank you for improving my wiki page on Eve C Zyzik. I'm having to create it for a Uni assignment, so your help is appreciated :)
Zarah629 (talk) 23:57, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
You can wrap your favourite code fragments as <nowiki> code fragment </nowiki> for easier cut & paste, fwiw, e.g.:
- [[Category:Year of birth missing (living people)]]
- #REDIRECT [[]]
- {{subst:refer|type=surname}}
There's also a tempate called {{tl}} which you can use to display a template name on which you can click to read its documentation, whilst preventing it doing its template thing, e.g. to produce {{coord}}, {{cite book}}.
All the above probably best read in edit mode. --Tagishsimon (talk) 09:47, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks, Tagishsimon. I'm now using HotCat which solves the Category one; and I've been working my way through both men and women listed in Australian Dictionary of Biography and have created many redirects. As for surname pages, I haven't created one since I saved the code. Your final suggestion will need my consideration tomorrow, in the clear light of day! Thanks for helping me to learn more of the intricacies and shortcuts of this great project we both participate in. I really appreciate it. Oronsay (talk) 10:26, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:01, 25 March 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
(Please excuse this post if it is a duplicate!)
Thank you for your help with tidying the articles of our new ANU contributors today.
I'm still playing with last night's scientists, but I see you've been all over the place adding links & such. No-one else will thank you, but I will. Well brought up, you see ;). I know how much work it is, so it's really appreciated that you're putting so much effort into these (as well as the economists - I saw your fingerprints there, too) --Tagishsimon (talk) 14:57, 5 April 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for all your fabulous contributions to the stubs I have been making! Most appreciated! ThatMontrealIP (talk) 02:42, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
 |
The Stub Barnstar | |
| I have been watching you expand my stubs, it's a wonderful thing! ThatMontrealIP (talk) 04:06, 9 April 2019 (UTC) |
thanks for the thanks. if you want a list of all the Florence Nghtingale medal recipients, many without articles, here is a query. -- cheers -- Queen-washington (talk) 20:25, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:17, 27 April 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Hi Oronsay, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the "autopatrolled" permission to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the autopatrolled right, see Wikipedia:Autopatrolled. Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! Schwede66 22:36, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
Kia ora Oronsay, just thought I'd leave you a note to say hi and thanks for the input on the Cheeseman family articles. I have been trying to add the sisters to the infobox on Thomas' article but I can't seem to get it right, even after reading the WP page about infoboxes! - do you know how to add a line to an infobox for relatives?? MurielMary (talk) 09:27, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:42, 22 May 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Thank you!LorriBrown (talk) 21:17, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
Thank you for participating in today's editathon and for supporting the other attendees. It was very much appreciated and made a big difference to their experiences today. Rubicon49bce (talk) 11:44, 15 June 2019 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Paula R. Pietromonaco is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paula R. Pietromonaco until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Yoninah (talk) 21:29, 20 June 2019 (UTC)
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:41, 25 June 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
I think you meant this. If you disagree, please say. --GRuban (talk) 13:13, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
| ||||||
About This Month in GLAM · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · Romaine 23:54, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Hello, Oronsay. Anna B. Eckstein, an article you either created or to which you significantly contributed,has been nominated to appear on Wikipedia's Main Page as part of Did you know
. You can see the hook and the discussion here. You are welcome to participate! Thank you. EnterpriseyBot (talk!) 10:07, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 06:46, 29 July 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
| ||||||
About This Month in GLAM · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · Romaine 08:20, 10 August 2019 (UTC)
On 13 August 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Anna B. Eckstein, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Anna Eckstein (pictured) dressed in white and collected six million signatures to promote world peace before the First World War? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Anna B. Eckstein. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Anna B. Eckstein), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Thank you for participating in the Franklin Women Wikipedia Edit-a-thon for Women in Health and Medical Research. We appreciate you sharing your expertise with us and your experience was incredibly valuable to the attendees. SnapFreeze (talk) 07:30, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 16:25, 27 August 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
@Oronsay: I am hoping you might turn your considerable abilities to the appalling article Australian Women's Register. Improvement is needed because Tom.Reding needs to link to it with the AWR link in the authority control (See Barbara Hanrahan... Ring me if I seem to be talking nonsense. We do need this article and I cannot see it being more than a pathetic stub.... MargaretRDonald (talk) 10:21, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
- @MargaretRDonald: I will look at it tomorrow morning and do some work on it then.Oronsay (talk) 12:44, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks, indeed. @Oronsay: MargaretRDonald (talk) 19:05, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
- @MargaretRDonald: I found an article as better source and added categories. Tom also did some edits overnight. I wanted to include The Encyclopedia of Women and Leadership in Twentieth-Century Australia - https://www.womenaustralia.info/leaders/about.html - but ran out of puff! Also, I thought I had an edit clash with you but it was the bot coming through to add the date to the more categories template! Hope what's there now will be enough. Interestingly, I had noted the need for articles on both AWR and Australian Women's Archive Project in Dec 2017 but never got around to doing anything about them! Oronsay (talk) 21:38, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks, indeed. @Oronsay: MargaretRDonald (talk) 19:05, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
I got tempted to do Jillian Green (see User:MargaretRDonald/sandbox/Jillian Green). The links to the Turner Galleries had such good texts and so many images illustrating her work.... (See exhibitions). But, there are only effectively four sources: her website, the Turner galleries, the NGA and Cruthers references. It is clear that she has had many major commissions, but the sources are possibly too close to her and not sufficiently many? Hoping you might do something to save the article. (PS. You probably knew it, but unlike the taxonbar, the authority control does not come up in the article preview, clearly the from parameter is no use here.) MargaretRDonald (talk) 00:04, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
- Another challenge will be inbound links, but there is List of Australian women artists.Oronsay (talk) 00:06, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
- Also, I don't think they'll like the external links from the exhibitions. Probably need to be as references. Oronsay (talk) 00:08, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks for that @Oronsay:. (I'll have another crack at it - perhaps - some time in the future.) MargaretRDonald (talk) 03:23, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
- Any better now? MargaretRDonald (talk) 04:07, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks for that @Oronsay:. (I'll have another crack at it - perhaps - some time in the future.) MargaretRDonald (talk) 03:23, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
- Also, I don't think they'll like the external links from the exhibitions. Probably need to be as references. Oronsay (talk) 00:08, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
Hi @Oronsay: See User:MargaretRDonald/sandbox/Mueller's female collectors This clearly is going to take me forever. (I was unable to do maps for the smiths. Data are entered differently in AVH as compared to MELISR and in fact I doubt if most of their data are entered - nothing corresponding to Winnie Jane could be found). However, the question is whether this format might be acceptable with so many unnotable names... PS Please suggest some suitable categories.. MargaretRDonald (talk) 01:51, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
- @MargaretRDonald: I've found and added one category so far. Will seek more if possible. Think the heading over the maps would be better as "Collection sites" or similar. I know it's not the women artists' project but Collections made me think of the Herbaria where the materials reside. Also, think the lifespan/fl dates would be better under the "Brief bio" section as dates are not names! Oronsay (talk) 03:28, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
- I gather that Julia Wells is one of Mueller's team. Oronsay (talk) 03:37, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
| ||||||
About This Month in GLAM · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · Romaine 07:20, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:36, 23 September 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
| ||||||
About This Month in GLAM · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · Romaine 17:31, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 22:59, 29 October 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
| ||||||
About This Month in GLAM · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · Romaine 09:01, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
 | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
|
The Original Barnstar |
| thanks for assessing my created article Jassy Husk. Marknamz8931 (talk) 07:44, 20 November 2019 (UTC) |
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:44, 25 November 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Hello, thanks for adding a link to Prof. Martha Clokie on the Arbitrium page. However, I could not find any citation for her making that particular claim. According to the Nature paper, what she said is something quite different. Can you please provide sources? Thank you. --Jose Mathew (talk) 18:05, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
- @Jose Mathew C: I created a link from Prof. Martha Clokie, but otherwise did not edit the article you started on Arbitrium. The statement you are querying was in the article when you first created the page, as you can see [here]. I have no knowledge of the subject matter so am not in a position to edit that section of the article. You are welcome to reword the section yourself to better reflect the references you provided - just be careful to edit the current version of the Arbitrium page. Oronsay (talk) 18:56, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
- Thank you. The current wording seems to imply that Prof. Clokie said something which (according to the Nature article) was said by Prof. Sorek. I'll try to reword this to make it more clear. --Jose Mathew (talk) 19:14, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Thank you for finding the date of death- I couldn't see it anywhere. I suspect there is more to say about the woman but I was editing as usual from online sources and at first I really struggled to find anything about her. It always amazes me how some days the information is like getting water from a stone but then the trickle starts... ☕ Antiqueight chatter 13:43, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
- @Antiqueight: Actually, I found the date through my Ancestry account, then searched for an accessible probate record to use as the reference. I am always saddened when I see the date of birth and details of a woman's life and work, but her death is missing, or just a year given, meaning that she faded into obscurity. Having a middle name and not marrying helped my search in Olive's case. Oronsay (talk) 18:11, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
- God yes - searching for a woman where she's only listed as Mrs His name or for a woman who marries and then goes into obsurity when she leaves her career because she married... Especially with the tendency of men to give their wives pet names so that she ends up known by a completely different name. I still say well done for finding that. ☕ Antiqueight chatter 18:53, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
| ||||||
About This Month in GLAM · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · Romaine 14:04, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
Hi Oronsay, First, thanks for adding the project info to the talk page. Second, I reverted most of your changes to the master's name. I generally try to stick to the name as it is in the source. This frequently, very frequently, leads to inconsistency within the WP article. But I do so in case someone, perhaps a genealogist or local historian is searching. It suggests alternatives they might try in their sleuthing, or may even help them find the article in the first place, depending on where they are starting from. (By the way, I have even seen ship's captains vary the spelling of their own name, or that of their ship, and that is nothing compared with the Anglicization of place names.) Cheers, Acad Ronin (talk) 21:33, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
- @Acad Ronin:. I should've realised the spelling variations were from the source docs. I have access to Australian newspapers and may add to the Enchantress (1825 ship) article. Oronsay (talk) 22:06, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
- No worries. As someone married to a demon proof reader, I wince at the untidiness of it, but function over form! No? As for the Oz papers, like most wikipedians I would be delighted to see any of my ship articles improved. Regards, Acad Ronin (talk) 23:46, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
May your christmas season be that, and avoid speed cameras, fires and the rest... JarrahTree 00:07, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
- Thank you, @JarrahTree:. Your kind words are reciprocated. Speed cameras are unlikely to bother me, but fires, smoke and heat remain ongoing concerns. Oronsay (talk) 21:41, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
- found this on someone elses page... but nonetheless it is a bit over the top... JarrahTree 03:09, 2 January 2020 (UTC)
| ||||||
About This Month in GLAM · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · Romaine 16:24, 11 January 2020 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:2020 Australian novels requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 05:34, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
- bollocks JarrahTree 06:03, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
- @JarrahTree: Ta. Now I should have 6 days to write an article about a 2020 novel! Oronsay (talk) 07:08, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
- my problem is the 2010 - 2019 cohort of articles could be added to and improved and there are only 36 hours in a day... JarrahTree 07:11, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
Thank you for alerting me to the errors associated with the naming of Hacke Place, Conder. I have, with the family's consent, initiated correction with the ACT Surveyor General. Doubtless this will take time!Lexysexy (talk) 05:07, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for your work on Ervin. You certainly added some value to the article. I took a few images of the S. H. Ervin Gallery and realised that Ervin needed an entry. Collywolly (talk) 22:30, 26 January 2020 (UTC)
- My pleasure, Collywolly. I watch the new Aussie articles each day and saw Ervin's article was single-sourced, so scratched around for what I could find. Oronsay (talk) 23:24, 26 January 2020 (UTC)
- Yes, I realised that it I only had one source. I looked around a bit but could not find anything that added value. There was an article with a photo of him with Bob Menzies, but it is still copyright. Anyway, at least there is now a name behind the S H Ervin Gallery. I liked your retitling as well. I was a bit slack about that. Sometimes we are too close to the trees to see the forest. Collywolly (talk) 00:00, 27 January 2020 (UTC)
Wikiwand in your browser!
Seamless Wikipedia browsing. On steroids.
Every time you click a link to Wikipedia, Wiktionary or Wikiquote in your browser's search results, it will show the modern Wikiwand interface.
Wikiwand extension is a five stars, simple, with minimum permission required to keep your browsing private, safe and transparent.
