User talk:Oranjelo100

This is Oranjelo100's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Welcome!

Hello, Oranjelo100, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ~~~~, which will automatically produce your name and the date.

If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!

– Fayenatic London 22:16, 9 March 2014 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thanks for your input. In the future please make use of the Show preview feature instead of saving each individual change when making several minor changes.2601:1:9C80:82:D5F6:571C:57CC:BB49 (talk) 04:20, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

Several months on, I agree with the above. Do you need help to find what we are talking about? – Fayenatic London 22:16, 9 March 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

List of Intel Core i7 microprocessors (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to TXT

List of Intel Xeon microprocessors (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to ECC

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:14, 26 June 2013 (UTC)

Please read my edit comments. This is wikipedia and no marketing organisation. Please find the blank key on your keyboard and use it where appropriate. DrSeehas (talk) 07:56, 27 June 2013 (UTC)

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Hello, I'm Faizan. I noticed that you made a change to an article, List of AMD Accelerated Processing Unit microprocessors, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Fai zan 08:34, 27 June 2013 (UTC)

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 23:17, 27 June 2013 (UTC)

Hi Emperor-Overlord100! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Benzband (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:17, 28 June 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ATX, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page MSI (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:59, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Comparison of CPU architectures may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

superscalar,up to 8mb lv3 cache(mainstream),up to 20mb lv3 cache(Extreme),Virtualization,[CISC]]

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:08, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

Again: Please find the space bar on your keyboard and use it where appropriate. --DrSeehas (talk) 15:21, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

Hello, Emperor-Overlord100. You recently added a number of internal links to Comparison of CPU architectures. Unfortunately, most of these links go to disambiguation pages, not to the articles you had in mind. Please check the links and correct them to ensure they point to the relevant page, or else remove the links. I have added a template to help with this. Click on "fix" in purple banner at the top of the page to access a helpful external site, Dabsolver. Cnilep (talk) 05:55, 24 July 2013 (UTC)

Hello, if you continue to omit blanks and add "DAB links" in your edits, I will revert your edits and report you. --DrSeehas (talk) 06:39, 24 July 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ATX, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page WTX (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:52, 28 July 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bulldozer (microarchitecture), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cooling (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 22:53, 4 August 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Intel Core i7 microprocessors, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vpro (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:05, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

Hello Emperor-Overlord100,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Intel ADX (Multi-Precision Add-Carry Instruction Extensions) for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. Take a look at our suggestions for essential content in short articles to learn what should be included.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Anastasia (talk) 18:55, 7 September 2013 (UTC)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Intel MPX(Memory Protection Extensions), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Fiddle Faddle 19:36, 7 September 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Intel SHA Extensions (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to SSE and SHA

Intel MIC (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to SMT

Intel MPX (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Registers

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:58, 14 September 2013 (UTC)

Please stop adding original research to this article. A partition table is, well, a data table and therefore does not have any executable code that can be subverted by a bootkit. The master boot record is most likely what you were thinking of. Here's some documentation to read. Socrates2008 (Talk) 09:16, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Nintemulator, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Fiddle Faddle 08:39, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Piledriver (microarchitecture), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page AVX (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:28, 21 September 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Steamroller (microarchitecture), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page APU (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:01, 28 September 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ivy Bridge (microarchitecture), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page RAS (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:43, 5 October 2013 (UTC)

Hello there! On one side, I really appreciate your efforts to contribute, but the style and language you are providing are unfortunately not good enough for Wikipedia. Here it's all about providing verifiable content in an academic style of writing — please have a look at the great manuals of style provided by Wikipedia.

I totally understand that nobody is perfect, but please do some practice before you contribute here. How about getting yourself a blog, so you can practice there? You can get that yourself for free, and in a few minutes.

For example, your idea of contributing Uop Cache section to the CPU cache article was really great, but it ended up with me and another editor spending much more time fixing dozens of your bad edits over two days, than it would've taken us to write that section from the scratch.

Also, a few minutes ago I accidentally went to the NetBurst (microarchitecture) article, just to discover some really bad layouts and a pointless section... So, I scratched my head and got it fixed, without checking the revisions log first. Later, I saw it was your work, too... :(

Dude, get serious, please. I know we all need to never stop learning, but please consider figuring that yourself, too. Thank you!

-- Dsimic (talk) 22:40, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

I've just spent three hours cleaning up the mess you've left behind in many articles (Broadwell (microarchitecture), Steamroller (microarchitecture), AMD CrossFireX and POWER8 — just to name a few)... Once again, the ideas behind your contributions are quite good, but their realisation is horrible. That's why I suggested you to learn and practice before contributing — and you'll be good. Please, don't get me wrong, I wish you only the best. -- Dsimic (talk) 23:11, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

Hello there! Just as a note, you've just made a total of sixteen edits on the Steamroller (microarchitecture) article — for only about ten new words added, with no edit comments, and with quite a mess in words / punctuation marks spacing etc. Hm? -- Dsimic (talk) 01:26, 4 November 2013 (UTC)

Just as a note, today you've made a total of 25 edits to the Haswell (microarchitecture) article, ending up with a very small amount of actual changes for so many edits – and resulting in a wording that required a total cleanup. -- Dsimic (talk) 14:15, 20 November 2013 (UTC)

Also, please don't use bare URLs when adding references, those are prone to link rot etc. Please use something like below as a template while adding references:


<ref>{{cite web
 | url = 
 | title = 
 | date =  | accessdate = 
 | author =  | publisher = 
}}</ref>

Thank you. -- Dsimic (talk) 14:47, 20 November 2013 (UTC)

Just as a note, this discussion moved over to my talk page. -- Dsimic (talk) 15:21, 20 November 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Steamroller (microarchitecture), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ALU (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:56, 12 October 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Intel MPX, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Compile (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 4 November 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Skylake (microarchitecture), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page LGA (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:31, 12 November 2013 (UTC)

Hello, Oranjelo100. Please be aware that a user conduct request for comment has been filed concerning your conduct on Wikipedia. The RFC entry is located at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Oranjelo100, where you may want to participate. -- Dsimic (talk) 00:41, 21 November 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Bulldozer (microarchitecture) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to CVT16

Haswell (microarchitecture) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Broadwell

Piledriver (microarchitecture) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to TDP

Skylake (microarchitecture) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to GB

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 21 November 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nintendo DS emulation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rendering (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Duopoly, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page PC (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:10, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

I disagree with your reversion of my edits on PCSX2. I suggest you come to the talk page and discuss it, where there's been a discussion taking place. Specifically, this article is not the place to discuss AMD vs Intel performance, trivia about CPUs, and advocacy. If necessary, we can have an RFC about the matter. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 06:46, 23 January 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

PCSX2 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Cache, Hardware, Post-processing, Bandwidth and Plug-in

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 23 January 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited PCSX2, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Resolution (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Radeon HD 7000 Series, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mantle (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 6 February 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Media Player Classic (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Plugin

Trac (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Tor

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 4 March 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Comparison of open-source software hosting facilities, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page SSH (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 14 March 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Comparison of open-source software hosting facilities, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Xenia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 2 April 2014 (UTC)

Please review - Talk:Dolphin_(emulator)#DolphinFX - MaJoRoesch (talk) 04:53, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

DeSmuME (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to JIT, MSAA and Post-processing

PPSSPP (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Resolution, JIT and SSAA

PCSX2 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to JIT and MSAA

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 9 April 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited I2P, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tor (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:51, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited DeSmuME, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rendering. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:40, 5 August 2014 (UTC)

Hello, please remember when you make an edit to a page to follow the proper table formats. Your recent edits on the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Nvidia_graphics_processing_units#GeForce_900_Series article removed many important columns from the table format. I had to reformat the table and add your edits in manually to fix the issue, normally people won't go to that much trouble and will instead undo your edits.

Please remember for next time to follow the correct formats, thanks. Jase240 (talk) 04:32, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

Hello

You and I have crossed path a couple of times during editing and I've noticed that you tend to respond reverts with a counter-revert instead of handling it properly without actually reading the reason for which you are reverted. Now, boldly editing, reverting and discussing is the nature of Wikipedia and the reason why people enjoy editing it. Almost every edit is bound to be reverted, and yes, there are people who take reverts as signs of hostility. As surprising is that, I am at a loss as to how they find editing Wikipedia fun or fruitful.

Of course, it isn't late to change course. I've reviewed and reverted your recent edits in DirectX because it consisted of adding indiscriminate info and being a product announcement. You can still discuss it in talk page, in case you have other reasons that justify its due weight. I promise you, I won't bite.

Best regards,
Codename Lisa (talk) 02:05, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

You are doing it again. This time in Dolphin (emulator). And by not providing an edit summary for your counter-revert, you are effectively calling me a vandal.

Best regards,

Codename Lisa (talk) 13:38, 1 November 2014 (UTC)

@Codename Lisa: I second this. This user has a long term history of flagrant abuse both of encyclopedic content (WP:3RR WP:FANCRUFT WP:GAMECRUFT WP:NOTDIRECTORY) and of people (ignoring or belligerently attacking all attempts of outside engagement), as is seen above about "Dolphin FX". I don't expect it to stop, so be prepared to pursue a block for tendentious editing. — Smuckola (Email) (Talk) 13:20, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) Hello! Well, welcome to the club – so to speak. Please see my talk page for my previous experience with Oranjelo100, which unfortunately was pretty much a mess with no visible solution: User talk:Dsimic § Uop Cache, User talk:Dsimic § Number of edits (Oranjelo100) and User talk:Dsimic § That guy sections. — Dsimic (talk | contribs) 19:58, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

@Dsimic and Codename Lisa: O, my longsuffering and ultra-civil compatriots. The clear solution is a long, long, long, long overdue ban. Which has been requested. And if it isn't a long term one, it will surely become one at this rate. None of us, and so many others, and the encyclopedia itself, should have to put up with his cruel incompetence. — Smuckola (Email) (Talk) 11:08, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

@Smuckola: Yeah, you're totally right, it's really exhausting to deal with something like that. It's no wonder that we have WP:COMPETENCE as an essay, but alas, essays are not obligatory. — Dsimic (talk | contribs) 11:16, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

@Dsimic: You have created one of the kindest and most elaborate conversational Dunning-Kruger effect tests I've ever seen with this guy. His test performance was like an olympic grade faceplant. You got Dunning-Krugered harder than FREDDY Kruger. It's the death of a thousand cuts! It isn't worth your breath; just a ban. — Smuckola (Email) (Talk) 11:57, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

Well, thank you very much for kind words... I'm almost starting to blush over here. :) I'm just trying to make Wikipedia better, both as an encyclopedia and as a work environment. :) — Dsimic (talk | contribs) 12:07, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

@Dsimic: I know, and sadly, the ends don't justify the means. No content is worth abuse. — Smuckola (Email) (Talk) 12:09, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

Oh, by the way, I don't like that much the concept of cutting or shredding someone to pieces. :) I'm a peaceful man. :) — Dsimic (talk | contribs) 06:12, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

@Dsimic: Yeah no kiddin, we gotta exercise self respect. OMG his username used to be "Emperor-Overlord100". ...........wat — Smuckola (Email) (Talk) 08:27, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Direct3D, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Clipping. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nintendo GameCube technical specifications, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Flipper. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:30, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

There is an ongoing move request. --George Ho (talk) 23:48, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

I've received several complaints about your edits from other editors. In general, please try to remain civil when interacting with other editors. Also, please try to use reliable sources in your edits. It appears many of your edits are either unsourced, or use unreliable sources. For instance, you have repeatedly re-added this source to an article but Wikis are not usable sources on Wikipedia - they fail WP:USERG because anyone can write or change the content at any time. Please keep these things in mind, as any of them could get you blocked if you continue to do them. Thanks. Sergecross73 msg me 17:55, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:01, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

You reintroduced challenged and uncited information in NetBurst (microarchitecture), even reintroducing the citation-needed tag. Additionally, you reintroduced other information and provided an unreliable citation, a citation that was actually a clone of Wikipedia. I removed those two changes (but left everything else in place, of course). Please be very careful, it's not permitted to reintroduce challenged and uncited information without providing a reliable cite for the information, even if you are pretty sure the information is correct. --Yamla (talk) 21:02, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

Your addition to Methamphetamine has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Diannaa (talk) 13:39, 22 December 2015 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Keikogi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sambo. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:38, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Direct3D may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

TIER enumeration|date=22 February 2015|work=MSDN library|accessdate=22 February 2015}}</ref>), optional [[Uniform memory access|Unified Memory Access (UMA)]] support, and additional Tiled
| Descriptors in CBV/SRV/UAV heap ||1M||1M||'''>1M'''

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:31, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited PlayStation Portable hardware, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page LOD. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:00, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Render output unit, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page MSAA. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:44, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to MIPS instruction set may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:59, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Anti-Arabism page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:24, 6 May 2016 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Racism in Poland.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Iryna Harpy (talk) 00:45, 8 May 2016 (UTC)

You are fighting your war against Polish people. Wikipedia isn't a raight place for such wars.Xx236 (talk) 07:14, 12 May 2016 (UTC)

You don't care to write Polish, Poles. Not polish.Xx236 (talk) 07:23, 12 May 2016 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Personnel halting and stimulation response rifle into Non-lethal weapon. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. — Diannaa (talk) 22:58, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

I see you are still not adding the required attribution, as required under the terms of the CC-by-SA license. Please have a look at this edit summary as an example of how it is done. Please let me know if you still don't understand what to do or why we have to do it. Thanks, — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 04:27, 19 October 2016 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Directed-energy weapon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Plasma. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:43, 9 August 2016 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Wrestling, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Technique. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:34, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

Hello,

You recently made a whole slew of edits on the aforementioned page, however this has left the page borderline unreadable. Because of this, I've reverted your edits. Please feel free to keep contributing to the page, but make sure your edits improve rather than degrade it.

Namely the issues with your edit were an alarming lack of line breaks, and using way too many initialisms. The majority of the information you added to the page does not belong in the opening paragraphs of the page but rather in a separate section elsewhere on it.

One of the sources you provided was also poor, namely this one; a Google spreadsheet by itself like that is completely meaningless to the reader. The rest of the sources, at least at a glance, seem fine though.

-- turdas^talk 23:54, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

If you see any problems with it could you try to improve it, instead of deleting it completely though I haven't finished it yet.Oranjelo100 (talk) 09:25, 23 August 2016 (UTC)

No. The onus is upon you, to stop writing broken English and generally unreadable prose, and stop citing non-WP:RSes. Stop citing weblogs, spreadsheets, and other random stuff. Stop making tons of little edits, incomplete edits, and edits without comprehensively justifying descriptions. Stop doing these things, ever, under any circumstances. This is all I've ever seen you do for years, and it's totally unencyclopedic. Everything you've always done is a huge long-term pattern of blockable offenses. @Turdas:, you have joined a long legacy of people reverting this defiant and uncooperative stuff. — Smuckola (talk) 10:11, 23 August 2016 (UTC)

I deleted it because I did not have the time to make heads or tails of it and fix it right that instant, and it seriously affected the quality of the page. Deletions on Wikipedia thankfully aren't permanent, so you can always recover what was deleted from the history of the page when you do have time to improve it—seems like you did that already, which is good.

I noticed you moved the edit to a more appropriate section, which is good. However, it's still difficult to read. You should break the text into at least 3-4 paragraphs, and avoid using that many initialisms. All the acronyms (WHG, ANE, EEF...) lose their meaning when you use so many of them.

When others cannot properly understand what you have written, it's difficult if not impossible for them to improve on it. That is exactly the case here as well. While it's plain to see that there is at least some information in your edit that is contributing to the article, it simply is too unclearly written to be of much value. You, the writer, are the one who best knows what you wanted to say, and thus you're the only one who can make it clear to others what that is.

-- turdas^talk 14:32, 23 August 2016 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of regions of Africa, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gold Coast. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:53, 23 August 2016 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

-- turdas^talk 13:18, 24 August 2016 (UTC)

See the discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#User:Oranjelo100. I have suggested there that you might be blocked due to the principle that WP:Competence is required. It has been suggested by another editor that you are using machine translation to make your edits, which accounts for their fragmentary nature. You may respond to the complaint if you wish. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 16:18, 24 August 2016 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Arabic script, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Swahili. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:36, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Islamic architecture, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Qalat. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:57, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited English honorifics, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mister. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:08, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Kunya (Arabic) into Arabic name. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:35, 19 October 2016 (UTC)

I see you are still not adding the required attribution, as required under the terms of the CC-by-SA license. Please have a look at this edit summary as an example of how it is done. Please leave a message on my talk page if you still don't understand what to do or why we have to do it. Thanks, — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:24, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

Hello, Oranjelo100. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

So these were your sources, and why they're no good:

http://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/latest-news/468595/world-war-3-china-long-march-6-rocket-beat-us-missile-defence-shield-20-nuclear-warheads
- Does not say the JL-3 exists or is operational. Only that tech from an existing missile may find its way into a the next PRC SLBM (provisionally referred to as JL-3 by media)
http://www.deagel.com/Ballistic-Missiles/JL-3_a003321001.aspx
- Deagal is actually an enthusiast website, owned and operated by, well, Deagal (check WHO IS.) Deagal's only reference is this article (Splutnik News of all things), which in turn takes for face value the beliefs of other enthusiasts about the Type 094A. Janes doesn't say anything about the Type 094A being armed with the JL-3; it just repeats the US DoD report saying that it's likely that the next PRC SSBN will be armed with a new SLBM.
http://www.atimes.com/article/the-future-of-chinas-nuke-missile-subs-how-worried-should-america-be/
- Also does not say the JL-3 exists or is operational. It says: "he underlines the imperative to develop the JL-3 SLBM with 12,000 km range that"; note the words "to develop".
http://www.scmp.com/news/china/diplomacy-defence/article/1864406/long-march-challenging-us-space-power-chinas-most
- The same as Daily Star; repeating the belief of some guy that the next-gen PRC SLBM (i.e. JL-3) may use tech found in existing missile.
https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/20140806042041-62667533-successful-test-of-china-s-jl-3-nuclear-slbm-able-to-hit-entire-usa
- From 2014. By an enthusiast (look up the website Tiananmen's Tremendous Achievements). And given that the nobody who constitutes a reliable source thinks the JL-3 exists yet, let alone was test launched, two years later pretty much makes this source a non-starter.

- RovingPersonalityConstruct (talk, contribs) 01:57, 25 November 2016 (UTC)

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Intercontinental ballistic missile page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:22, 26 December 2016 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Jeh. I noticed that you made a change to an article, X86, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. You used over two dozen edits to add about two dozen claims of fact and you didn't provide a RS (or any source, for that matter) for a single one. I know the table is woefully unsourced as it is but that doesn't mean it's ok to make it worse. I strongly suggest that if you want to improve the x86 article your time would best be spent by adding references for the existing material in the table. edit summaries would be good too. Jeh (talk) 20:10, 26 December 2016 (UTC)

I see you have re-reverted to your version without discussion. That is contrary to WP:BRD. Please see the discussion I've started at the article talk page. Thank you. Jeh (talk) 20:27, 26 December 2016 (UTC)

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Precision-guided munition page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:28, 28 December 2016 (UTC)

I suggest reading the Manual of Style's guidelines for See Also sections. You are items a plethora of items that go beyond being "tangentially related" and which would appear in a "comprehensive article on the topic". - RovingPersonalityConstruct (talk, contribs) 17:22, 28 December 2016 (UTC)

Addendum: Like, I am unsure why you think adding links to specific systems to the list for a general subject article is particularly relevant. In an individual weapon article, links would be to similar/related weapons.

For, say, the SLBM article, a see also link to the ICBM article has a clear place; links to non-ballistic missile - or bomb - articles do not. The link to nuclear warfare serves as the articles gateway to everything else.

Also, you might consider whether it's worth adding ranges to the items in the article. It's a maintenance nightmare. Consider what happens if, for whatever reason, the range statistic is changes in the weapon's main article; now someone needs to go and hunt down every instance everywhere else. This can be particularly vexing for subjects for which our understanding is limited and which may change frequently. - RovingPersonalityConstruct (talk, contribs) 17:35, 28 December 2016 (UTC)

There is a discussion proposing deletion of your recent edits at Template_talk:Weapons_of_mass_destruction#Speculative_material. Your comments would be welcome. --SteveMcCluskey (talk) 14:07, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Archaeogenetics of the Near East shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

see Talk:Archaeogenetics_of_the_Near_East#New_content - please discuss per WP:BRD. thx Jytdog (talk) 01:34, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

One revert isn't edit warring and sorry but nowhere in the policy does it state that you should remove primary and secondary sourced content. It only says that a good article should have primary, secondary and tertiary sources but nowhere does it say that every single sentence in the article needs such sources and I already gave two.Oranjelo100 (talk) 14:10, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Zen (microarchitecture)

added links pointing to AGU and ALU

Action role-playing game

added a link pointing to Ashen

Dubai Waterfront

added a link pointing to Waterfront

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:44, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Abdul-Malik Badreddin al-Houthi

added a link pointing to Saudi-led intervention in Yemen

Famine in Yemen

added a link pointing to Saudi-led intervention in Yemen

Negroland

added a link pointing to Gold Coast

Resistance movement

added a link pointing to Rebel

Targeted killing

added a link pointing to FSB

Tibetan people

added a link pointing to Admixture

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:15, 17 March 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for adding items to Template:United States research agencies. I reversed a couple of the additions because they aren't primarily R&D agencies, despite having subordinate commands that are. I left a note the template talk page on what kind of agencies should go in the template, since we should avoid making it too cluttered. Antony–22 (^talk⁄_contribs) 01:01, 20 March 2017 (UTC)

Hi Oranjelo, you appear to have been previously warned about adding information without providing reliable, verifiable, secondary references, so your work on Rain World does not appear to be out of ignorance. Is there a reason why you continue to add content without sources? czar 20:27, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

All I added is correct sice I played it already.Oranjelo100 (talk) 20:31, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

Can look for sources but it's correct.

Wikipedia follows Wikipedia:Verifiability, not truth. As a tertiary source, it matters more that we are citing the best sources than that we say what is correct. Readers trust our sources, not our writers. Please revert your edits if you do not have a source. czar 20:34, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

I decided to add those early since reviews aren't out yet.

Not really. Wikipedia is founded on verifiability, and our content is only as good as it paraphrases its sources. Anonymous reports on the Internet are fundamentally unable to be trusted. But in any event, it's not my policy. Considering that you've already been advised multiple times above, your account may be blocked if you continue to add unsourced content, so please don't do it. czar 22:14, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

My bad. Nevertheless almost all of my commits are sourced but when you edit a large amount of pages things happen sometimes.Oranjelo100 (talk) 12:29, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Houthis

added a link pointing to Saudi-led intervention in Yemen

Improvised explosive device

added a link pointing to Saudi-led intervention in Yemen

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:44, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Garlic routing, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mixmaster. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:43, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Emulator

added a link pointing to Hardware

Mind uploading

added a link pointing to Emulation

Nail bomb

added a link pointing to Needle

Stencil buffer

added a link pointing to Boolean

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:42, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Ulch people

added links pointing to Native Americans and Devil's Gate

2017 Shayrat missile strike

added a link pointing to Hype

7.62×51mm NATO

added a link pointing to Saudi-led intervention in Yemen

Boeing AH-64 Apache

added a link pointing to Yemeni Civil War

MG 34

added a link pointing to Saudi-led intervention in Yemen

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:56, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Future of the Russian Navy

added a link pointing to Rearmament

Heckler & Koch G3

added a link pointing to Saudi-led intervention in Yemen

Homefront (video game)

added a link pointing to Turmoil

Kalashnikov rifle

added a link pointing to Kalash

Technical (vehicle)

added a link pointing to Mortar

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:16, 21 April 2017 (UTC)

Hi, I just wanted to let you know, I undid your last (only the last one) update on the Nuclear Weapon Design article, the one that linked to Interstage. Our article on Interstage is purely the rocketry term not related to the thermonuclear weapon usage, so the link wasn't really helpful. I don't know that we need an Interstage article for the nuclear component, but if someone or you create one then that link would be appropriate then. It was a good thought, thanks for that effort and the other edits there. Have a good weekend! Georgewilliamherbert (talk) 23:09, 21 April 2017 (UTC)

Okay, thanks.Oranjelo100 (talk) 23:15, 21 April 2017 (UTC)

The Tsar was a secret test. NATO estimated the yield form indirect seismic indications at 57 MT. After the USSR failed and the specs for the test became known from Russian soures, their direct measurements were recorded at 50 MT. The Soviets left the 57 stand during the cold war for obvious reasons, but the accurate figure is 50 MT. SkoreKeep (talk) 19:46, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

I see. Oranjelo100 (talk) 15:25, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Thermonuclear weapon

added links pointing to Compression and Implosion

122 mm howitzer 2A18 (D-30)

added a link pointing to Saudi-led intervention in Yemen

C14 Timberwolf

added a link pointing to Saudi-led intervention in Yemen

Demographics of the United Arab Emirates

added a link pointing to African

MICA (missile)

added a link pointing to Air-to-air

Nuclear weapon design

added a link pointing to U-238

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:08, 28 April 2017 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Committee

added a link pointing to Commission

Khorasan group

added a link pointing to Khorasan

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:10, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Blast wave

added a link pointing to Negative pressure

Bomb

added a link pointing to Impact

Chukotko-Kamchatkan languages

added a link pointing to Moribund

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:43, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at North Korea and weapons of mass destruction shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially, because the page is currently under restrictions from the Arbitration Committee, if you violate the one-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than one revert on a single page with active Arbitration Committee restrictions within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the one-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the one-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Hornetzilla78 (talk) 03:59, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

Nowhere on this page says it's a one revert page from what I can see. Also what kind of problem do you see with these additions? All are sourced. Oranjelo100 (talk) 04:19, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

Material you added to the page was copied directly from http://www.nti.org/learn/countries/north-korea/biological/, and thus was a copyright violation. Please don't add copyright material to this wiki. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 20:13, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

Oh so that was the problem? How can I add this information without a copyright violation then? Oranjelo100 (talk) 20:31, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

That paper has never been published and from the comments I've seen probably won't be published in a reliable journal. So we can't use it. 09:29, 24 May 2017 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Doug Weller (talk • contribs)

Yeah, it wasn't published yet(not sure if it'll later) but reliable primary sources are allowed on Wikipedia. It does add a lot of relevant data about his genetic affinities and relatedness to other populations which is important. Oranjelo100 (talk) 11:43, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Chicken 'tendies'. We all had a good laugh about that one. ‡ Єl Cid, Єl Caɱ̩peador ^ᐁT₳LKᐃ 18:02, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

Not vandalism. Some do call like that even if not seriously but indeed might not be necessary to add it.Oranjelo100 (talk) 18:14, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

From googling "tendies" I understand that it is a meme. If you did not purposefully reference the meme and the addition was in good faith, then I apologize, but it is still unsuitable for inclusion. ‡ Єl Cid, Єl Caɱ̩peador ^ᐁT₳LKᐃ 19:52, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

Ok Oranjelo100 (talk) 06:07, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

		The Teamwork Barnstar
		Thanks for your teamwork on Egyptian Arabic. Regards, the eloquent peasant (talk) 02:16, 30 July 2017 (UTC)

Dear Oranjelo, you may recall that in May I complained about the format of the references you left on the Semitic languages page. I also brought that point to the attention of the talk page, but that elicited no response by anyone, including you. I still believe that the format the sources are in is neither helpful nor acceptable to Wikipedia standards. It would be better if you create proper entries in the "additional reference literature" section and then place an author-date reference into the inline text. Since I cannot access these resources to check on page numbers and accuracy of the quotes, I cannot do this for you. Landroving Linguist (talk) 06:51, 15 August 2017 (UTC)

I think it's better to put links at the start of article and it is helpful that you can click and enter the sources directly. Hardly anyone will reach that "additional reference literature" section.

Oranjelo100 (talk) 06:57, 15 August 2017 (UTC)

The links you provided link to the Polish Google Books site, which the average Wikipedia user cannot read. The links themselves are cryptic and provide no information about the source hiding behind it without actually clicking on the link. But since you are either not willing or not able to fix this, I will try my best. Please do not revert this time. If you feel that you do need to revert, please first engage on the talk page, and provide an edit summary with your reasoning. Failing to do any of this, which seems to be your habit, is quickly interpreted as disruptive editing by other editors and can lead to blocks. Landroving Linguist (talk) 11:23, 15 August 2017 (UTC)

Content in these links is in English for me. I think the compromise would be leaving the links where they're but with added author and title to the citation links but I'm not sure how to do that. Oranjelo100 (talk) 11:44, 15 August 2017 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited RetroArch, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Interface and Media player (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:43, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Trench warfare (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Jamming and Overheat

Defensive fighting position (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Foxhole

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:07, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

Hello, Oranjelo100. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited RGS-50M, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pellet (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 18:33, 14 December 2017 (UTC)

I reverted your edit because there isn't a timeline article about the war only from December on, and your link redirected to the timeline for the period between October and now, which is already linked.ᗞᗴᖇᑭᗅᒪᗴᖇᎢ (talk) 02:34, 16 December 2017 (UTC)

I see. Ok. Oranjelo100 (talk) 15:36, 17 December 2017 (UTC)

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to United States recognition of Jerusalem does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Seraphim System ^(talk) 23:17, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rohingya people, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Indigenous and Bengali (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:02, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

Hi, I see you are still not using edit summaries or and I think your last edit does not have a clear source. Please use edit summaries and review your edits to check if they are all sourced. Seraphim System ^(talk) 22:39, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

It's clearly sourced. Oranjelo100 (talk) 22:41, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at United States recognition of Jerusalem, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Your recent edit altered a quote that is not supported by the source it is cited to, please do not continue to add unsourced material to the article. Seraphim System ^(talk) 23:16, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

I did just that, and simply wrote what politicians involved in this issue said. How are those citations not reliable? I didn't add anything unsourced. Oranjelo100 (talk) 23:19, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

You did here , please self-revert. Seraphim System ^(talk) 23:22, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

That's not a reason to revert everything you reverted. You also rollbacked it which makes it hard for me to revert you to add this content back. Also that Turkey quote wasn't completely right either way but I now fixed it. Oranjelo100 (talk) 23:36, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

I did not rollback, nor could I since there are many intervening edits. You did not fix the quote, you added material to a quotation by a President that is not sourced. The edits I removed were full of typos, or violated other policies like WP:NEWSORG. I removed some excessive citation. I also improved some of the sources, as PressTV is not the best source to use when others are available (in this case I replaced the PressTV source with reuters). I also removed other unreliable sources, like NYPost.Seraphim System ^(talk) 00:41, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

Hello, on the article Slavery in Libya, you recently added that there were reports of migrant slaves having their organs harvested and being burnt (roasted). One of the sources you used was a tabloid Daily Mail (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5127881/Africans-sold-slaves-Libya-organs-harvested.html)

The Daily Mail "report" article actually contained fake news and fake claims from a former Nigerian ex-minister Femi-Fani Kayode, originally published on Twiiter. Daily Mail is an unreliable tabloid, regardless I am not here about Daily Mail, but to warn about fake news.

His tweet claiming to show migrant slaves having their organs harvested in Libya (https://twitter.com/realFFK/status/936357386536747008), was actually of Eritrean migrants abducted and tortured in Egypt in 2015 per a Radio France Internationale news article (http://en.rfi.fr/africa/20150402-pariah-partner-eu-mulls-policy-change-eritrea).

Another tweet (https://twitter.com/realFFK/status/935459164180054016/), claimed to be of a sub-Saharan migrant burnt alive by Libyans. However, the image is actually from Iraq where a man of an Iraqi militia is shown alongside a criminal tortured by the Iraqi Shia militias. This can be seen from a Somali-language news article by Somalimemo24. (http://somalimemo24.com/articles/5793/Shiicada-Ciraaq-iyo-Mareykanka-oo-Duullaan-Ballaaran-Ku-Qaaday-Magaalada-Muusil) Google Translate can be used to read the article in English.

Another one of his claims is 75% of slaves being southern Nigerians which has never been verified. I have shifted his claims to Reactions as it is consists of fake news and unverified claims. MonsterHunter32 (talk) 00:58, 25 December 2017 (UTC)

Also your other source Huffington Post (http://www.huffingtonpost.co.za/2017/12/03/lawyer-slaves-in-libya-are-used-for-organ-trade_a_23295417/) is of a lawyer Bobby Banson who is not present in Libya claimimg the migrants are only sold for their organs and not for work. This is however contradictory to the reports by those investigating the slave trade in Libya. His claims are unverified and directly contradicting those monitoring the slavery that people are being sold for work. Therefore I have added the full context about his claims per the Huffington source. MonsterHunter32 (talk) 01:04, 25 December 2017 (UTC)

Your continued change is completely unwarranted on all levels. 1) My edit accurately says what The Economist source says. I quote the source: "one of the biggest causes of hunger often goes unmentioned: a leafy plant called qat." You have removed it based upon your own reasoning: "It's definitely not a major cause as they cultivated Khat since middle ages and famine happened only after Saudi attack." (FYI: Qat's use was mainly confined to north-western Yemen and its nationwide popularity originated after Yemeni unification; its popularity has only increased since with increasingly detrimental implications for Yemenis that are now coming to the fore.) Just because the source's conclusion doesn't agree with your reasoning is absolutely no excuse to change. Wikipedia's info is added based upon what sources say. We cannot oppose that if the source's info contradicts our own opinions. 2) You keep mentioning the fact that The Economist has a paywall; can you show me any wiki policy saying that non-free sources disqualify their info being added? If not, then you should cease with this baseless charge. 3) You question the reliabilty of the link when The Economist is commonly regarded as reliable.

With the contribution of editor Karl.i.biased my edit was altered to reflect proper wiki policy regarding WP:RSUW. Please stop seeking to change this result. --27.99.54.243 (talk) 05:14, 9 January 2018 (UTC)

Sources have to be proven to be reliable and what you linked is just one sentence as article doesn't have free access so it's impossible to verify. Oranjelo100 (talk) 16:08, 9 January 2018 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to List of terrorist incidents in 2017. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Loopy30 (talk) 13:49, 15 January 2018 (UTC)

March 2017 Kabul attack article shows 150+. I assumed that number in the article is correct. It's hard to find the exact number of killed in this attack. Now that I'm looking I can't find anything about 150 so it indeed seems incorrect. I corrected the number in the article.

Oranjelo100 (talk) 14:22, 15 January 2018 (UTC)

It is not standard practice to add Google translation links into citations. We allow non - English citations. Only direct quotes need translation. (see WP:NONENG). EvergreenFir (talk) 07:36, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

But it says "If you quote a non-English reliable source (whether in the main text or in a footnote), a translation into English should always accompany the quote." Oranjelo100 (talk) 08:07, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

A navbox is for navigation, i.e., the wikilinks have to exist (no red links) and have to use the navbox for navigation. Any other links are considered as wikispam and strictly against the rules, please check this in {{CPU technologies}}. –84.46.53.157 (talk) 06:24, 27 January 2018 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jobaria Defense Systems Multiple Cradle Launcher, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Yemeni Civil War and Saudi-led intervention in Yemen (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

An article that you have been involved in editing—Internal conflict in Bangladesh —has been proposed to be renamed and moved. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you.Vinegarymass911 (talk) 16:36, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

Hello Oranjelo100,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Khormusan for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source, probably infringing copyright.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 04:48, 10 February 2018 (UTC)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Ghader (missile). First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Qader (missile). Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Qader (missile). If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Captain Sweden 18:35, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

I didn't know these were the same missile. Is name Qader more correct than Ghaser? Oranjelo100 (talk) 18:39, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Prognathism, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page African (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:47, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

Hello Oranjelo100,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged QTS-11 for deletion, because it appears to duplicate an existing Wikipedia article, QBZ-03.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

SamHolt6 (talk) 00:46, 17 February 2018 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Baizuo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Liberal (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 27 February 2018 (UTC)

You have put a link into the article on Galileo Galilei to a non-existent article on the immutability of the heavens. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.149.188.178 (talk) 08:51, 5 March 2018 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Unfortunately, content you added to Haplogroup R1a appears to be a minority or fringe viewpoint, and appears to have given undue weight to this minority viewpoint, and has been reverted. To maintain a neutral point of view, an idea that is not broadly supported by scholarship in its field must not be given undue weight in an article about a mainstream idea. Feel free to use the article's talk page to discuss this, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Tgeorgescu (talk) 20:49, 5 March 2018 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Fist of the North Star characters, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Blind spot (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 6 March 2018 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited LAV-25, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gunner (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:36, 15 March 2018 (UTC)

The article directly addresses why the information is inherently out of date, and why it's not possible for the information to be 'up to date'. I've removed the template since the perceived problems cannot be remedied. Anastrophe (talk) 15:33, 26 April 2018 (UTC)

It's possible for it to be up to date as data for 2017 seems to be available. Why only UNODC is used on that article? Oranjelo100 (talk) 16:10, 26 April 2018 (UTC)

That is fully explained within the article. Please read it. Thanks. Anastrophe (talk) 16:51, 26 April 2018 (UTC)

It says that it's because of inconsistencies in national statistics. Are there no other consistent international sourcs? Oranjelo100 (talk) 17:52, 26 April 2018 (UTC)

It's not just due to data inconsistencies. From the article: "This chart does not use the very latest data due to differences in how intentional homicide is defined, collected, and calculated for each country. In order to have more consistent, continuous, and reliable oversight only the latest UNODC sourcing is used for this section on countries." The UNODC data, while flawed (as would be any source's data when trying to collate hundreds of country's data collected in different ways) is the best available, and to my knowledge the only intergovernmental agency that collates such data transparently. Anastrophe (talk) 18:06, 26 April 2018 (UTC)

I'll add that I agree the article is not ideal because of the reliance on UNODC - but it is the only workable comprise, because the data itself can never fully and accurately reflect 'current data'. It's inherent to the nature of this kind of list; an ideal article can't be achieved. Anastrophe (talk) 18:08, 26 April 2018 (UTC)

For your edit here – do you have a source? Best, Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 13:27, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

Just added. Oranjelo100 (talk) 13:45, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Albert Anastasia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Waterfront (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 2 May 2018 (UTC)

Hi, may I ask what's the purpose of creating talk pages consisting of one or two letters? — Pizzahut2 (talk) 20:31, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

I'm just creating talk pages where there is none. Letters are beacuse you need to type something to begin with to create a page. Oranjelo100 (talk) 04:29, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

Wait, What?! Seriously? Please, talk pages are NOT decorations— WP:TALK they are created by participating editors of an article for dialogues concerning editing. WurmWoode^T 20:17, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

True, according to WP:TALK#CREATE: "Do not create an empty talk page simply so that one will exist for future use." Oranjelo100, please stop doing this. IMHO this is irritating: People see that the talk page link is blue and think something meaningful is written there so they visit it, and are greeted with something meaningless like "v" or a blank page. It's not helpful.

May I suggest that you put this into your created talk pages, if nothing has been added to it: {{Db-g7}} You can find them here. Check those which have a length of 1 or 2, i.e. there's a (+1) or (+2). — Pizzahut2 (talk) 19:18, 30 August 2018 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited APILAS, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tube (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:44, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

An article you recently created, List of terrorist incidents in June 2018, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. ... discospinster _talk 02:10, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

Well, it does not sources yet because there is still some time to June. After terrorist attacks happen in June they will be added. Could stay in the mainspace for now as sources will be added in June, either way. Oranjelo100 (talk) 14:33, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

Hi, I've reverted your move of United Defense to United Defense industries for 2 reasons: First, you miscapitalized "industry". Second, Wikipedia uses WP:COMMONNAMES, not official names, and you provided no proof that "United Defense Industries" is the common name. The few sources cited in the article that still work appear to use "United Defense". Thanks, and please be more careful about spelling and capitalization. - BilCat (talk) 20:23, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

Ditto for Plasan,as that appears to be the common name.. - BilCat (talk) 02:07, 2 June 2018 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Archaeology of Israel, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Canaanite (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:29, 6 June 2018 (UTC)

Hello, I'm TheFarix. I noticed that you made one or more changes to an article, Biomega (manga), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. —Farix (t | c) 20:51, 9 June 2018 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Séléka, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Illicit (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 19 June 2018 (UTC)

Greetings! I just wanted to let you know about some things regarding category sorting. When you add a page to a category using [[Category:Example category]], the page is by default placed in the category and sorted by the page name. Sometimes we use the magic word {{DEFAULTSORT:sortkey}} to change the way the page is sorted in all categories. For example, human names like John Doe are sorted as Doe, John, and titles with disambiguators are sorted without those disambiguators (i.e. Mercury (element) has a default sortkey of "Mercury"). We can also set individual categories to have their own sortkeys by typing [[Category:Category we want page to go in|Sortkey we want page to be sorted by]]. Sometimes we use this to eliminate redundancy or sort by more meaningful information; for example, 1976 Summer Olympics has the sortkey "Olympic Games" for Category:1976 in Canadian sports because using the default sortkey (1976 Olympic Games), thus including 1976 in a category about 1976, would be redundant. Sometimes, articles are about a topic that also has a category, such as with Kurdistan: there is both an article Kurdistan and a category Category:Kurdistan. We want the article Kurdistan to be a first in a list of pages (a category) about Kurdistan, so we use the sortkey " " (a whitespace) when adding it to its category, as whitespaces always come first alphabetically. When you added Category:Historical regions to that page, you included a whitespace sortkey, presumably because you were copying the first category you saw; this was not correct, because the category "Historical regions" is not primarily about Kurdistan, so we want that article to sort where you would normally expect to find it: that is, under "K". I've corrected it for you.

Anyway, I'm not trying to be patronizing or anything like that. I had to figure all of that out on my own, and did it wrong many, many times in the meantime, and it would have been nice if someone had taken the time to explain it to me. I wasn't sure how much you knew about categories, so I included all of it; hopefully, you find it helpful. Incidentally, you could also help editors like me by using an edit summary; there's a user notification template that does a better job of explaining everything about it than I ever could, so I'll attach it below for you. Happy editing! —Compassionate727 ^(T·C) 22:03, 1 July 2018 (UTC)

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! —Compassionate727 ^(T·C) 22:04, 1 July 2018 (UTC)

Hi. Please read what Compassionate727 explained to you above, and familiarise yourself with how category sort keys work before attempting to work on any more categories. Thanks. --Paul_012 (talk) 04:21, 8 July 2018 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gun turret, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mechanism (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 8 July 2018 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 14 October 2017 Mogadishu bombings, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fireball (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 18 July 2018 (UTC)

We tend not to use this for medical content. Best Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 09:38, 26 July 2018 (UTC)

This is a secondary source so should be okay, but I added more sources.Oranjelo100 (talk) 11:02, 26 July 2018 (UTC)

Those are popular press sources and primary sources. We have some secondary sources like this https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29068607 Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 11:24, 26 July 2018 (UTC)

I have updated this section some Toxoplasmosis#Research which discusses the topic of the article you added. It is all very tentative. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 11:50, 26 July 2018 (UTC)

It still doesn't seem to mention incrased propensity for risk-taking and starting businesses. Oranjelo100 (talk) 11:55, 26 July 2018 (UTC)

Yes because we need a better reference for that. A single study and the popular press it generates is not sufficient. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 16:49, 26 July 2018 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ruselectronics, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Federal (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 27 July 2018 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Indirect fire, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Antiquity (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for creating Sunda (continent), Oranjelo100!

Wikipedia editor Ajpolino just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Hello! A cursory internet search gives the impression that there is much more written about Sunda. Any chance you're up to adding a bit more to this article? If not, I can try to fill it up a bit more before I forget about it forever (though sadly I have no innate interest in prehistoric continents). Happy editing!

To reply, leave a comment on Ajpolino's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Ajpolino (talk) 20:36, 8 August 2018 (UTC)

Hi, I'm Ajpolino. Oranjelo100, thanks for creating Sahul (continent)!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Hi there! You seem to have been around for a while, but if you'd like any help adding content or formatting these new continent articles just let me know and I'm happy to lend a hand. Cheers!

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Ajpolino (talk) 21:24, 8 August 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for creating Destruction of Yemeni cultural heritage by Saudi-led coalition, Oranjelo100!

Wikipedia editor DBigXray just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

redirect to Saudi_Arabian-led_intervention_in_Yemen#Infrastructure_damage_and_humanitarian_situation

To reply, leave a comment on DBigXray's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

DBigXray 14:40, 10 August 2018 (UTC)

Could you restore it? I think it should have its own article. Oranjelo100 (talk) 14:44, 10 August 2018 (UTC)

I am willing to restore it, provided we two can have a consensus on the WP:N of this article based on WP:SIGCOV and WP:NEVENT, based on the lack of individual notability it is best to redirect it and develop the subsection at the War page. If individual notability is established, it can be WP:FORKED at a later date. --DBigXray 14:49, 10 August 2018 (UTC)

Moved to Talk:Saudi Arabian-led intervention in Yemen § A new article has blanked and redirected here

Please stop adding parent categories to articles, as you did here and here. Category:Rotary cannon is in the Category:Autocannon, so adding the latter category to articles that already have the former category is unnecessary. Thanks. - BilCat (talk) 05:17, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

Hi. Using bare URLs for citations is really ugly and difficult to maintain (see WP:PLRT). In this diff, I templated one of the the citations that you added. I also noticed that you are adding the same citations to several articles. This is problematic because it suggests that you may have a conflict of interest. Boghog (talk) 22:48, 16 August 2018 (UTC)

I agree with Boghog, which is why I cited WP:Link rot here. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 23:24, 16 August 2018 (UTC)

No conflict of interest on my part. Oranjelo100 (talk) 02:52, 17 August 2018 (UTC)

If you haven't seen this yet, please check out User:Diberri's Wikipedia template filling tool (instructions). Given a PubMed or PMC ID, one can quickly produce a fully formatted citation that can be copied and pasted into a Wikipedia article. Boghog (talk) 09:17, 17 August 2018 (UTC)

Here is another bare URL that you have inserted that I reformatted. Another convenient tool for formatting citations is Wikipedia:RefToolbar. One can paste in a ISBN, DOI, or PMID identifier and the tool will create a fully formatted citation that you can past into the article. Boghog (talk) 11:14, 17 August 2018‎ (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Annexation of Crimea by the Russian Federation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Crimean Tatar (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:27, 12 September 2018 (UTC)

Hello. I recently noticed you've reverted changes made to the Human cannibalism on 15:22, 23 August 2018. This update doesn't look quite reasonable since it did eliminate some of its detailed content structures and additional facts. Please refrain yourself from making redos or reverts that are not issued under the concrete reason.

I'm not sure what you're talking about, I didn't revert anything on that page recently. You confused me with someone else. Oranjelo100 (talk) 13:09, 15 October 2018 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Saudi–Yemeni War (1934), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tehama (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 18 October 2018 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Investment (military), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Shelling (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:29, 7 November 2018 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 1948 Arab–Israeli War, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Transjordan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 16 November 2018 (UTC)

Hello, Oranjelo100. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Charlestown Mob (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Irish

United States Penitentiary, Hazelton (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Shiv

Whitey Bulger (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Saloon

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 4 December 2018 (UTC)

Can you please explain your edits and cite reliable sources for them? At the moment your edits to archaeology-related articles just come across as random changes, which creates a chore for the rest of us to check/revert/correct them.

I note this is far from the first time you've been asked by other editors to do both. – Joe (talk) 11:35, 18 December 2018 (UTC)

They aren't random. Oranjelo100 (talk) 06:13, 5 January 2019 (UTC)

Hello Oranjelo100! I wanted to ask why the number of victims of the listings of terrorist attacks are marked from green to red, depending on their severity. It seems a bit cynical to me. Greetings, --Sokrates2987 (talk) 12:14, 23 December 2018 (UTC)

No idea. I didn't set it up tis way but generally color red is associated with danger. Oranjelo100 (talk) 13:00, 23 December 2018 (UTC)

I just wanted to ask here, because I split the German version of the list from June of this year and I am completely reworking it, I use the same color as here. I was then asked why I chose this color scheme.--Sokrates2987 (talk) 22:16, 24 December 2018 (UTC)

Who asked you? I don't know if there is some kind of tradition or censensus on colors for terrorist attacks. You can say that lists of terrorist incidents previously used this color scheme. Oranjelo100 (talk) 22:43, 24 December 2018 (UTC)

A user from the German version asked me that. Thank you!--Sokrates2987 (talk) 20:33, 28 December 2018 (UTC)

It could be that German wikipedia is using a different color scheme? Oranjelo100 (talk) 22:37, 28 December 2018 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bucephalus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Estate (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 27 December 2018 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Drawing, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sketch (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 19 January 2019 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Capital punishment by country, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Moratorium (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:58, 28 January 2019 (UTC)

I reverted you here because there was no need for WP:Disambiguation. Read WP:Disambiguation and WP:Article titles. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 02:22, 30 January 2019 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Khitan people, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lifestyle (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:27, 10 February 2019 (UTC)

Hello. Help improve for article Maureen Wroblewitz. Thanks you. Arina56 (talk) 12:53, 10 February 2019 (UTC)

What improvement you have in mind, @Arina56? Oranjelo100 (talk) 13:00, 10 February 2019 (UTC)

User is a sock, now blocked. – Jonesey95 (talk) 21:07, 24 February 2019 (UTC)

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to Ancient Germanic law does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! —DIYeditor (talk) 23:46, 18 February 2019 (UTC)

Hi, thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. However, may i suggest you to write edit summaries when you edit this encyclopedia please ? This would be useful for other users who may review your edits. Thanks in advance and happy editing. Best regards.---Wikaviani ^{(talk) (contribs)} 12:53, 21 February 2019 (UTC)

Why is the Medieval era(Middle ages)Article only on European History? Either change the Title or change the content.

Culpable Injustice (talk) 11:12, 10 April 2019 (UTC)

As far as I know dates of Middle Ages aren't strongly defined outside of Europe. Oranjelo100 (talk) 21:35, 10 April 2019 (UTC)

Why is it only on European History? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Culpable Injustice (talk • contribs) 11:12, 10 April 2019 (UTC)

Oranjelo100, do you have a reliable source you can cite for the statement that the death toll is now 293 in 2019 Sri Lanka Easter bombings? The citations there presently say 290, so it is problematic to say 293 in the article and only cite sources saying 290. --Bsherr (talk) 08:51, 22 April 2019 (UTC)

This suggests that 290 died in the main attack + three cops afterwards. Oranjelo100 (talk) 10:43, 22 April 2019 (UTC)

That makes sense. Thanks for clarifying. Maybe a parenthetical would be appropriate? Looks like I wasn't the only one who missed it. --Bsherr (talk) 21:49, 22 April 2019 (UTC)

The number of victims increased to 359. Oranjelo100 (talk) 05:42, 24 April 2019 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

History of Cyprus (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Ptolemaic

Publius Clodius Pulcher (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Praetorian

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 5 May 2019 (UTC)

Hi, I'm spending a lot of my time reverting links that you add that are unnecessary. Please review Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Linking#What generally should not be linked, and pay attention to the kinds of links you've been adding that violate these guidelines. Thanks. - BilCat (talk) 06:26, 7 May 2019 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Heat death of the universe, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Maximum entropy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 14 May 2019 (UTC)

What prompted the move of Breaking Bad? There's no other pages "breaking bad" currently conflicts with that I can tell, so disambiguating the name doesnt help at all. --Masem (t) 18:14, 19 May 2019 (UTC)

Majority of articles of other tv shows have (TV series) in their titles. Oranjelo100 (talk) 18:20, 19 May 2019 (UTC)

Oranjelo100, Masem, I undid the moves of Breaking Bad and Better Call Saul. Some TV shows have that disambiguation after the title, but only if it's necessary. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:30, 19 May 2019 (UTC)

Orangelo, it might be a good idea if you would stop making bold moves for a while, and propose them first. You don't appear to understand the difference between an official name and a common name, and that a common name generally has priority. There are other problems with your moves too, as with M230 chain gun, so getting a consensus first would help to avoid such issues in the future. Thanks. - BilCat (talk) 01:24, 30 May 2019 (UTC)

I have also reverted your move of Combat Vehicle 90 to "Combat Vehicle 90 (CV90)." Please do not make unexplained moves, and please read up on WP:AT. Mark Schierbecker (talk) 00:36, 21 July 2019 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Standard Average European, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Copula (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:33, 1 June 2019 (UTC)

What is the point of adding lists of Indo-European consonant changes to that article?? There was a [ɑː] to [ɔː] shift between Old English and Middle English, but it was not part of the English Great Vowel Shift... AnonMoos (talk) 18:09, 5 June 2019 (UTC)

Jnst listed other notable sound changes. Oranjelo100 (talk) 18:26, 5 June 2019 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sound change, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Slavic palatalization (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:35, 8 June 2019 (UTC)

Just wanted to point out that items in categories are also in the parent and grandparent categories so no need to add the categories regions and historical regions when an entry is already in the category historical regions of Anatolia. --Erp (talk) 03:13, 25 July 2019 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pontus (region), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hatti (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:59, 25 July 2019 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

AT&T (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Telephone service

AT&T Corporation (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Telephone service

Chaldia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Antiquity

Maryannu (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Warrior caste

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:34, 1 August 2019 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

AT&T (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Telephone service

AT&T Corporation (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Telephone service

Forced assimilation (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Way of life

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:50, 8 August 2019 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Apam Napat (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Indo-Iranian

Grand duke (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Kingdom

Weregild (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Blood money

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:29, 15 August 2019 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Valentinus (Gnostic), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Paralia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:07, 26 August 2019 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Russian nobility (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Burgher

Theft from Interstate Shipment (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to International

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:46, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Are you a valuable contributor to the encyclopedia?

From your talk page, it looks like the answer may be "no", and that's a problem. It's not enough to have good intentions – you need to know what you're doing. You've been here for six years, and you're making the same errors as ever, with no sign of improvement. Lack of references. Bare URLs. Empty summaries. Ambiguous links. Failure to preview before saving. Instead of helping, you make more work for other people. Editors tell you how to do better, and you ignore them.

So why are you here? Why won't you listen? Why would you want to be part of a community that doesn't think you're a valuable member?

I'm waiting for answers, and it doesn't look like I'm alone. If you have the ability and willingness to improve your edits, this community would like to have you. If not, we can and will do without you. Wouldn't you'd be happier if people weren't constantly complaining about you? Either way, you can make that happen.

—swpb^{T • go beyond • bad idea} 13:58, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Well, that's not very polite of you. I'm here because I want to improve Wikipedia. I make summaries when I think they're needed and the rest is largely not true. Oranjelo100 (talk) 14:34, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Facts are neither polite nor impolite. It doesn't matter whether you think you're doing a fine job, it's the rest of the community that matters. This is not encouraging. I'll be checking on you to see if you improve in any way. If not, we can start all manner of public discussions that may or may not bring sanctions, and will certainly take lots of your time. The power to make your life easier is entirely yours. —swpb^{T • go beyond • bad idea} 17:55, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

I think you shouldn't talk in name of all Wikipedians. I'm okay with fair scrutiny but you mischaracterized my contributions. Please read WP:NPA, WP:ASPERSIONS and WP:SANCTIONGAME. Using WP:COMPETENCE can be considered a personal attack and so can be claiming that my contributions are worthless. I don't really get anything as I don't get paid for editing Wikipedia. Oranjelo100 (talk) 19:04, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Other Wikipedians have already spoken (and given evidence) for themselves, and reminding you of that can't possibly be a PA. By the way, your contributions don't have to be "worthless" for you to be sanctioned – the expectation of a competent editor isn't "does more good than harm", it's "does as little harm as possible, and tries to do less all the time". Of course, if your contributions really aren't problematic, then you have nothing to worry about. It's worth considering, though, how an editor with whom you've had no previous interaction at all could come across your history and be so disturbed as to feel compelled to comment – I'm certainly not doing this for my enjoyment. —swpb^{T • go beyond • bad idea} 13:08, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

Then, you should check my actual contributions as a whole, instead of apparently basing your opinion on me based some comments on my talk page (some of it by editors I had minor content disputes years ago). Saying things like Why would you want to be part of a community that doesn't think you're a valuable member? is hurtful and disparaging. One of WP:5P is respect between editors. Oranjelo100 (talk) 16:23, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

I'm looking at messages up to this week (ambiguous linking in particular – just because it's a bot doesn't mean you can ignore it), but there's no sense in arguing this out – time will prove one of us right. I really hope it's you. —swpb^{T • go beyond • bad idea} 13:20, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

If you put the following into User:Oranjelo100/common.css, links to disambiguation pages will appear to you in a different color from links to articles, so you can spot and fix them in preview, before you save the page. You can change the colors to whatever you want.

 /* Set dab links color */
 a.mw-disambig:link {
   color:#FFAD0A;  /*orange*/
 }
 a.mw-disambig:visited {
   color:#F07B00;  /*darker orange*/
 }

—swpb^{T • go beyond • bad idea} 13:25, 26 September 2019 (UTC)

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Rambo: Last Blood, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. You've gone incognito (talk ⋅ contribs) 11:17, 1 October 2019 (UTC)

They were constructive.Oranjelo100 (talk) 12:18, 1 October 2019 (UTC)

Not this and this. In the first diff you changed one production company to an incorrect one, and in the second you added a minority viewpoint that's only held by one critic—something which WP:DUE does not allow. You've been in this site more than I have, so you should know better. You've gone incognito (talk ⋅ contribs) 12:42, 1 October 2019 (UTC)

Millennium Films and Millennium Media seem to be the one and the same. Link in the article actually links to Nu Image. Article mentions what various critics have said about the film (most of cited articles are based on one author). The source I added is as WP:DUE as any already in that Rambo article. Anyway article's talk page should be better for discussions. Oranjelo100 (talk) 13:39, 1 October 2019 (UTC)

Yes they're the same, but that's not the reason why I reverted you. You removed Millennium Media (which pipe-links to the Nu Image article) and changed it simply to Nu Image, which was not correct as they didn't produce this movie. With regard to your edit in the reception, see WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS as your essential "Oh, it's in other Wikipedia articles, therefore I may include this here" argument is not gonna fly. Again, minority views such as the one you included don't belong in Wikipedia, per WP:DUE, because they'd be giving undue weight to views that are already held in high regard. Besides, I wrote the entire reception section and not one critic agree or disagree with the reviewer who said it's an "old man's Punisher movie". You've gone incognito (talk ⋅ contribs) 13:56, 1 October 2019 (UTC)

I may take it to article's talk page later. This isn't the right place for content disputes. Oranjelo100 (talk) 14:15, 1 October 2019 (UTC)

Hello, I'm SummerPhDv2.0. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, 18th Street gang, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. SummerPhD^v2.0 01:39, 14 October 2019 (UTC)

Hello and done. Added source. Oranjelo100 (talk) 02:41, 14 October 2019 (UTC)

Hello. Help copy edit and improve the article Akane Yamaguchi. Thanks you very much. 14.162.146.38 (talk) 02:42, 14 October 2019 (UTC)

Hello. In what way exactly? Oranjelo100 (talk) 02:49, 14 October 2019 (UTC)

Copy edit. 14.162.146.38 (talk) 02:50, 14 October 2019 (UTC)

Anything in particular? Oranjelo100 (talk) 03:08, 14 October 2019 (UTC)

Says "This category's scope is limited to human-related history since the end of Earth's most recent glacial period ("the Ice Age") around 10,000 to 15,000 years ago.' - after the Younger Dryas in other words. Doug Weller talk 06:15, 26 October 2019 (UTC)

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Hi Oranjelo100! I just wanted to let you know that I've twice reverted your addition of "The Complicated Relationship Incels have with Race" to the Incel article. This is because it appears to be a self-published source, which does not meet the reliable sourcing policy. The information you're supporting with this article is already cited, and there is no need to add an unreliable source to try to support it. GorillaWarfare (talk) 01:21, 29 December 2019 (UTC)

An article you recently created, List of terrorist incidents in March 2020, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. b uidhe 19:08, 5 March 2020 (UTC)

Someone moved the page to "Draft" space. Someone else created List of terrorist incidents in March 2020 meaning there is no longer any reason to keep the draft.

Consider asking for it to be deleted by putting {{db-author}} at the top of Draft:List of terrorist incidents in March 2020. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 23:06, 6 March 2020 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. - Ahunt (talk) 21:38, 7 March 2020 (UTC)

Russian articles (ru:2А42 and ru:2А72) clearly mentioned it as different guns. It is impissible to "modify" gun, giving it compeletly another principle of automatic.Ходок (talk) 17:01, 8 March 2020 (UTC)

@Ходок: They use the same principle. They have nearly identical ballistics.

Well, you can see manufacturer website 2A42and 2A72, that clearly denote different principle "Работа автоматики пушки основана на использовании энергии отката ствола при его длинном ходе"(2A72) and "Автоматика пушки основана на использовании энергии пороховых газов, отводимых через боковое отверстие в стволе"(2A42). Same ballistic came from the same cartridge - 30x165 Ходок (talk) 06:20, 9 March 2020 (UTC)

The additional source you've provided does not cover Avangard per se and mentions both scramjet and ramjet engines in the context of hypersonic cruise missiles, not HGV's. Moreover, the source I had previously pointed to (Jane's) explicitly contradicts your edits, therefore what you're trying to add to the article is at best controversial and at worst complete rubbish. I've reverted your edits and suggest we do not end up in a pointless edit war. -- Nicholas Velasquez (talk) 23:8, 19 March 2020 (UTC)

Update: I've also reverted your edits in the "Scramjet" article for the same reason: even though you used "reportedly" there, the source provided does not speak of scramjet engine in the context of HGV's, let alone Avangard specifically. -- Nicholas Velasquez (talk) 0:13, 20 March 2020 (UTC)

An article you recently created, Kronstadt Group, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. b uidhe 03:21, 20 March 2020 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bartitsu, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Eclectic (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:11, 27 March 2020 (UTC)

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Abbyjjjj96 (talk) 18:21, 11 April 2020 (UTC)

If you want to add Krav Maga as an art directly derived from aikido, you need a source. Your personal view of what constitutes a hybrid martial art is not relevant here; you need to produce a reliable source from a recognised authority that specifically says, "Elements of Krav Maga are directly derived from aikido", or something else equally unambiguous. Until you have such a source, please refrain from adding Krav as a descendant discipline. to the aikido article.
The same goes in a wider sense for the vast majority of your recent edits to martial arts articles; Kashima Shin-ryū is not a hybrid martial art by any meaningful definition of the term, nor is judo. You are making a considerable mess by interjecting your own opinions into a wide variety of articles, and it doesn't look to me as if you have provided a source for any of these changes. Please either produce reliable sources, or stop your disruptive editing. Yunshui ^雲 _水 14:34, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

A clubs own website about their style is not a reliable source. Put it this way, if I make up my own martial art today called Yunshuido and publish a website saying that it's a descendant art of aikido, should it be included in the article? I've opened a discussion on the article talkpage for further input, please posit any further additions there, together with suitable sources and an argument for why they should be included. Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information; we require reliable sources. Yunshui ^雲 _水 09:53, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kronstadt Group is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kronstadt Group until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sulfurboy (talk) 00:08, 23 April 2020 (UTC)

see CIA World Factbook .^[1]— Preceding unsigned comment added by The Eloquent Peasant (talk • contribs)

Says this: in addition to the regular members of the House of Representatives there are 6 non-voting delegates elected from the District of Columbia and the US territories of American Samoa, Guam, Puerto Rico, the Northern Mariana Islands, and the Virgin Islands; these are single seat constituencies directly elected by simple majority vote to serve a 2-year term (except for the resident commissioner of Puerto Rico who serves a 4-year term); the delegate can vote when serving on a committee and when the House meets as the Committee of the Whole House, but not when legislation is submitted for a “full floor” House vote; election of delegates last held on 6 November 2018 (next to be held on 3 November 2020)

Also: All modern inhabited territories under the control of the federal government can be considered as part of the "United States" for purposes of law as defined in specific legislation.^[2] Oranjelo100 (talk) 17:48, 8 May 2020 (UTC)

* Yes, it is part of the US but is not IN the US. See what it saysin the CIA World Factbook.

"Area:This entry includes three subfields. Total area is the sum of all land and water areas delimited by international boundaries and/or coastlines. Land area is the aggregate of all surfaces delimited by international boundaries and/or coastlines, excluding inland water bodies (lakes, reservoirs, rivers). Water area is the sum of the surfaces of all inland water bodies, such as lakes, reservoirs, or rivers, as delimited by international boundaries and/or coastlines.Area field listing

total: 9,833,517 sq km

land: 9,147,593 sq km

water: 685,924 sq km

note: includes only the 50 states and District of Columbia, no overseas territories" The Eloquent Peasant (talk) 17:53, 8 May 2020 (UTC)

References

[1]
"United States". The World Factbook. Central Intelligence Agency. January 3, 2018. Retrieved January 8, 2018.
[2]
See 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(36) and 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(38) Providing the term "State" and "United States" definitions on the U.S. Federal Code, Immigration and Nationality Act. 8 U.S.C. § 1101a

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Arena Football League, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page IFL (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:59, 10 May 2020 (UTC)

Please remember that articles are supposed to go only in the most specific category, and that if an article is in a category itself that has a parent category, the article does not need, and outright should not, have that parent category itself added to the article. This is because the article is already in that category via the more specific category. You have been told this before, so you know better. You have recently added a loot or redundant categories, and they must be reverted. Please revert those incorrect redundant categories. oknazevad (talk) 15:11, 13 May 2020 (UTC)

Please read the WP:CATEGORY page and stop adding categories that already are covered via daughter categories. The category system on Wikipedia is hierarchical, and no article should be in both a category and that category's parent category. You've been told this repeatedly now. If you don't stop I will have to take it to ANI. oknazevad (talk) 18:53, 14 May 2020 (UTC)

And you're still doing it! Stop adding parent categories to articles that are already in child categories. How hard is it to understand that? Competency is required and if you are going to show such gross incompetency after you've been outright told you're incorrect, then there's really no choice but to file a report at WP:ANI. This is the last time I'm going to mention this. If you persist in ignoring the guidelines for categories, I will file that report. oknazevad (talk) 15:32, 28 June 2020 (UTC)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on National Volleyball Association, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. (See section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here.   Kadzi   (talk) 21:51, 28 May 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for contributing to the article National Basketball Association. However, do not use unreliable sources such as blogs, your own website, websites and publications with a poor reputation for checking the facts or with no editorial oversight, expressing views that are widely acknowledged as extremist, that are promotional in nature, or that rely heavily on rumors and personal opinions, as one of Wikipedia's core policies is that contributions must be verifiable through reliable sources, preferably using inline citations. Thanks! P.S. If you need further help, you can look at Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia, or ask at the Teahouse. The same applies to your edits at National Football League and Major League Baseball. – Sabbatino (talk) 22:19, 30 May 2020 (UTC)

I added other sources that show the same thing. Oranjelo100 (talk) 16:04, 4 June 2020 (UTC)

An article you recently created, MLS Collective Bargaining Agreement, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ~ Amkgp ✉ 04:33, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

@Amkgp: Could you move it back to the mainspace? Oranjelo100 (talk) 04:50, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

Oranjelo100, Is it ready for main-space inclusion? If yes, submit for review. The article will be reviewed and moved to mainspace. ~ Amkgp ✉ 05:03, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

@Amkgp: No point in waiting for weeks and and there was no real need to put it on draft. Oranjelo100 (talk) 16:05, 4 June 2020 (UTC)

I started a discussion here regarding the future of an article you created. You're welcome to participate. Neonblak ^talk - 19:52, 9 June 2020 (UTC)

An article you recently created, Jigō Tenshin-ryū, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ~ Amkgp 💬 20:24, 17 June 2020 (UTC)

MLS Collective Bargaining Agreement, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

~ Amkgp 💬 20:29, 17 June 2020 (UTC)

Please do not copy and paste WikiProject templates without checking the status of the article. Only articles that have passed through the Good articles process can be rated as GA-Class. Also, please limit the number of WikiProjects being tagged, as generalized ones (e.g. Organizations and Cooperatives) should be reserved for higher concepts instead of every instance. Sounder Bruce 05:52, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

An article you recently created, List of terrorist incidents in July 2020, does not have enough content and citations as written to remain published. I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 16:34, 2 July 2020 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from one or more pages into List of terrorist incidents in July 2020. While you are welcome to re-use the content of Wikipedia, here or elsewhere, our licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please either provide attribution in this case, or identify the source article so that someone else can do it. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Please be aware that editors who repeatedly copy content without attribution risk being blocked from editing. Thank you. --John B123 (talk) 16:38, 2 July 2020 (UTC)

An article you recently created, Serie A2 (men's handball), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 05:50, 9 July 2020 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Category:Professional sports leagues in in Turkey requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

This message was automatically delivered by QEDKbot. 19:57, 10 July 2020 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Professional sports league organization, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Franchise (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:41, 11 July 2020 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lamar Hunt, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Professional football (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:21, 18 July 2020 (UTC)

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Wide receiver, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use your sandbox. Thank you. Eagles 24/7 (C) 13:28, 1 August 2020 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Wide receiver, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Eagles 24/7 (C) 23:51, 1 August 2020 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Christian McCaffrey, you may be blocked from editing. Eagles 24/7 (C) 14:47, 3 August 2020 (UTC)

Slotback article says he is a slotback. Oranjelo100 (talk) 21:15, 4 August 2020 (UTC)

Wikipedia is not a reliable source, and you failed to provide one at Christian McCaffrey anyway. Eagles 24/7 (C) 22:02, 4 August 2020 (UTC)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, 2020 MLR Draft, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. IMani ^{→ (Talk) 😃} 10:05, 9 September 2020 (UTC)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, MLR Draft, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. IMani ^{→ (Talk) 😃} 10:08, 9 September 2020 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Scrub baseball, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fielder.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:39, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in Armenia, Azerbaijan, or related conflicts. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Cabayi (talk) 20:17, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sargon of Akkad, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gutian.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:23, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Category:United States Rugby Players Association requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 13:41, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

Category:United States Rugby Players Association has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:40, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

An article you recently created, MySports League, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:11, 17 October 2020 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Negative mass

added a link pointing to Speculative

Quantum logic

added a link pointing to Quantum theory

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:15, 23 October 2020 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Negative mass, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Speculative.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:36, 30 October 2020 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

British baseball

added a link pointing to Rugby

Drew Brees

added a link pointing to Football coach

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:24, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:34, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Aaron Rodgers

added a link pointing to Center field

Ken Griffey Jr.

added a link pointing to Clubhouse

Major professional sports leagues in the United States and Canada

added a link pointing to Draft lottery

Tractor beam

added a link pointing to Force field

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:17, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

If you look at Talk:List of multi-sport athletes, you will see that there's a pretty clear consensus that high school is not a high enough level to be considered a notable multi-sport athlete. Best, GPL93 (talk) 20:01, 30 November 2020 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Category:Professional Rugby union leagues in Americas requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:23, 1 December 2020 (UTC)

Category:Professional Rugby union leagues in Americas has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 18:07, 1 December 2020 (UTC)

Category:Association football players that played in the NFL has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Place Clichy (talk) 11:34, 4 December 2020 (UTC)

Category:Australian rules football players that played in the NFL has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Place Clichy (talk) 11:34, 4 December 2020 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hockey stick, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Puck.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:08, 5 December 2020 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2000 in sports, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Six Nations.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 26 December 2020 (UTC)

Hello, Oranjelo100. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Jigō Tenshin-ryū".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 17:12, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

Hello, Oranjelo100. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Serie A2".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 21:17, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Edge computing

added links pointing to Server and Bandwidth

Computer security software

added a link pointing to Firewall

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:31, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

While you are in the Examples sections, would you please put them in alphabetical order? Thanks!—Anita5192 (talk) 19:37, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

I sometimes accidentally link to disambiguation pages when adding a lot of content, but when the main part of an edit is to create an intrawiki link, it's not difficult to check that the link is correct and does not point to a disambiguation page before saving. We're volunteers: we should not unnecessarily create extra work for others. See this recent edit by you. From browsing your talk page, it seems that earlier concerns have been expressed about you linking to disambiguation pages. Swpb's suggestion from Sep 2019 works for me and looks safe. I suggest you try it... Boud (talk) 23:54, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

Hi Oranjelo100, the page 2019 South and Central American Women's Club Handball Championship you moved to South and Central American Women's Club Handball Championship is only the first edition of this Continental handball tournament, hopefully there will be more editions every year after the pandemic, so there should be two articles, one being the championship itself (South and Central American Women's Club Handball Championship) and the other the 2019 edition of it (2019 South and Central American Women's Club Handball Championship). Best regards Argemiro1975 (talk) 10:02, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

I see. Oranjelo100 (talk) 11:52, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Per-pixel lighting, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Illumination.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:22, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Category:Mix network requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:56, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Feudal baron, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Barony.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:41, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

Hi, please read WP:OVERCAT and particularly WP:NONDEF. The only defining categories in the lead of this article are science fiction horror, role-playing game, and transhumanist themes. There's no mention of any of the other categories you've added. You are also using subcategories, that are in the same category that lead back to the same place: WP:OVERLAPCAT. If you would like to contribute to the article with references that define the article better, and so the categories you have added, that would be great. Sciencefish (talk) 16:35, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

Eclipse Phase is defined by being nanopunk and biopunk not by postcyberpunk (and it's more dystopian than typical cyberpunk). Cyberpunk_derivatives article says this: In addition to themes of its ancestral genre postcyberpunk might also combine elements of nanopunk and biopunk (note that nanopunk and biopunk aren't the same genre as postcyberpunk). Also WP:OVERLAPCAT doesn't say that overlapping categories are prohibited. Oranjelo100 (talk) 17:02, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

That maybe the case in the Cyberpunk derivatives article, but there's nothing about it in the Eclipse Phase article. Eclipse Phase isn't referenced in Cyberpunk derivatives. Sciencefish (talk) 17:09, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

Also categories can also only be used when reliable sources "commonly and consistently" use that to describe and define the subject, per WP:DEFINING. Many of the categories you've added today are not defining categories. They may be correct to some aspects, but fail WP:DEFINING. Canterbury Tail talk 21:59, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Multi-agent system, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Environment.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:13, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

Hi there, can you please stop adding this content to various articles Spacetime, Four-dimensional space, Minkowski space? In each case (, , ) you added the same fringe content, based on a clearly unreliable source to different articles. Thanks. - DVdm (talk) 18:23, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#PailSimon. // Timothy :: talk 18:48, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

History of gravitational theory

added a link pointing to Mechanism

State space

added a link pointing to Configuration

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:16, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

I can see you've been asked this many times before, but can you please use edit summaries when making changes like your recent edits to Recent African origin of modern humans? Otherwise it is very difficult for other editors to understand why you are doing things like changing the details of sourced content or adding unsourced and/or seemingly unrelated entries to a list. If nothing else, please do not revert other editors without an explanation. This is edit warring and could lead to a block.

Also, a minor note, but "bp" (lowercase) conventionally denotes an uncalibrated radiocarbon date measured in years. The dates you added for Liujiang man ("111-139 bp") read as "111 to 139 radiocarbon years before present". As they are not uncalibrated radiocarbon dates, and are significantly older than a century, it should be "111,000 to 139,000 BP" (uppercase), "111–139 ka" or, to be consistent with the rest of the article, "111 to 139 thousand years ago". – Joe (talk) 12:16, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

Hello. That Google Books source is about multiple migrations from Africa, why do you want to remove it? Oranjelo100 (talk) 15:14, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

No problems with the source, but the statement you added it with was * 220,000 years old, Apidima 1 in Greece. With no further explanation, a sentence fragment about a single fossil doesn't make any sense in a list of migration waves out of Africa. Maybe Apidima 1 should be mentioned there – but that's exactly why people keep asking you to explain your edits. We can't read your mind. – Joe (talk) 11:31, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jalisco New Generation Cartel, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sicario.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:24, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

Hi! Please check your sources more carefully before using them. For example, citing genocide details to Capital & Celeb News or citing physics claims to predatory publisher (Trade Science, Inc.) fall well short of Wikipedia's verifiability policy. Thanks! — MarkH₂₁^talk 07:39, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

Following up, please be more careful with the sources that you cite. Forbes contributor articles, as you used here, are generally unreliable per WP:FORBESCON. — MarkH₂₁^talk 21:45, 3 April 2021 (UTC)

This is the third request for you to stop citing unreliable sources, like citing a post by "raseef22 website" from 112 Ukraine. — MarkH₂₁^talk 04:12, 13 April 2021 (UTC)

Happy St. Patrick's Day!
I hope your St. Patrick's Day is enjoyable and safe. Hopefully next year there will be more festive celebrations.
Best wishes from Los Angeles. // Timothy :: talk

A tag has been placed on Category:Shellworld requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:55, 18 March 2021 (UTC)

Hello, Oranjelo100. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:MySports League, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:03, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

Hi there! I've noticed that you've been editing on the Uyghur genocide page quite a bit, though a good bit of your edits don't have edit summaries attached to them. I appreciate the work that you do and the time that you put both into that page and elsewhere on Wikipedia. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This would be a big help in figuring out what you've changed while editing the article so I can double-check the work and modify it/add citations where appropriate. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. Thanks! — Mikehawk10 (talk) 05:40, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Human rights in Yemen into Yemeni Civil War (2014–present). While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa (talk) 12:18, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

I'm the original author. I added it first in Children in the military article. Oranjelo100 (talk) 13:04, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. — MarkH₂₁^talk 18:11, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

There is a currently a proposal for an indefinite block in the AN/I thread regarding your edits. If you don't want this to happen, I would recommend you go to that thread, and respond to some of the posts people have made, or address their concerns in some way. A couple people have suggested some form of training or mentorship, which to me seems preferable to someone being indefinitely banned over what seem to me like easily avoidable issues. jp×g 20:15, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for a general lack of competence and collaborative spirit. This is a community decision: please see https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&diff=1020210764&oldid=1020210304.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Drmies (talk) 20:29, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

Sorry for a delayed response. So it's too late to respond or can still appeal somewhere? Can that Ani thread still be reopened so I can try defend myself? I didn't edit for a few days, and didn't know this discussion was going on. Come back and I'm banned. I'm shocked. Oranjelo100 (talk) 03:32, 29 April 2021 (UTC)

I believe you'll need to us the code displayed above in order for the relevant people to see your request for appeal -

"{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}", otherwise they won't know of your request. I'm an entirely uninvolved party, happened to run across the block discussion, and am surprised at the extreme measure taken for a first-time block. cheers. Anastrophe (talk) 23:21, 30 April 2021 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Oranjelo100 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Sorry for a delayed response. So it's too late to respond or can still appeal somewhere? Can that Ani thread still be reopened so I can try defend myself? I didn't edit for a few days, and didn't know this discussion was going on. Come back and I'm banned. I'm shocked. Oranjelo100 (talk) 03:32, 29 April 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Please compose an appeal here (with a new template) and it can be copied over to the admin's noticeboard. You likely have only one shot at this. MER-C 18:39, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I have put Oranjelo's comment into the unblock template above, and I have also mentioned this case in the AN thread Off-wiki brigading regarding Uyghur genocide- and Chinese Communist Party-related topics, where Oranjelo was mentioned (not in a bad way). Oranjelo, if you are unblocked, I advise you to comment in that thread. Bishonen | tålk 09:36, 6 May 2021 (UTC).

Category:Shellworlds in fiction has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 09:57, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article C6A1 FLEX is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/C6A1 FLEX until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Elshad (talk) 11:26, 27 October 2023 (UTC)

Category:Artificial wormholes in fiction has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 12:45, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

Template:Major Leagues has been nominated for merging with Template:Top-level sport leagues in the United States. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 21:18, 16 April 2024 (UTC)

Category:Mix networks has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Brandon (talk) 17:22, 9 July 2024 (UTC)

[WF-1] [1]
"United States". The World Factbook. Central Intelligence Agency. January 3, 2018. Retrieved January 8, 2018.

[2] [2]
See 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(36) and 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(38) Providing the term "State" and "United States" definitions on the U.S. Federal Code, Immigration and Nationality Act. 8 U.S.C. § 1101a

[1]

[2]

Using "Show preview" button

Disambiguation link notification for June 26

Missing blanks and AMD

June 2013

Your recent edits

Emperor-Overlord100, you are invited to the Teahouse

Disambiguation link notification for July 21

July 2013

Comparison of CPU architectures

Warning

Disambiguation link notification for July 28

Disambiguation link notification for August 4

Disambiguation link notification for August 29

Speedy deletion nomination of Intel ADX (Multi-Precision Add-Carry Instruction Extensions)

Speedy deletion nomination of Intel MPX(Memory Protection Extensions)

Disambiguation link notification for September 14

Rootkit

Speedy deletion nomination of Nintemulator

Disambiguation link notification for September 21

Disambiguation link notification for September 28

Disambiguation link notification for October 5

Please get yourself a blog

Disambiguation link notification for October 12

Disambiguation link notification for November 4

Disambiguation link notification for November 12

RFC/U discussion concerning you (Oranjelo100)

Disambiguation link notification for November 21

Disambiguation link notification for January 9

Disambiguation link notification for January 16

PCSX2

Disambiguation link notification for January 23

Disambiguation link notification for January 30

Disambiguation link notification for February 6

Disambiguation link notification for March 4

Disambiguation link notification for March 14

Disambiguation link notification for April 2

DolphinFX

Disambiguation link notification for April 9

Disambiguation link notification for May 4

Disambiguation link notification for August 5

Nvidia 900 Series

Collegial editing

Disambiguation link notification for October 6

Disambiguation link notification for January 3

Talk:Metal Gear: Ghost Babel

January 2015

ArbCom elections are now open!

Netburst

December 2015

Disambiguation link notification for January 6

January 2016

Disambiguation link notification for January 26

Disambiguation link notification for February 5

February 2016

Reference errors on 5 May

May 2016

Poland

Copying within Wikipedia requires proper attribution

Disambiguation link notification for August 9

Disambiguation link notification for August 16

Regarding your recent edits on Ethnic groups in Europe

Disambiguation link notification for August 23

Discussion on Administrator's Noticeboard/Incidents

Disambiguation link notification for September 9

Disambiguation link notification for September 16

Disambiguation link notification for September 23

Copying within Wikipedia requires proper attribution

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

JL-3

Reference errors on 25 December

December 2016

Reference errors on 27 December

See also sections

Speculative material at Template:Weapons of mass destruction

Edit war warning

Disambiguation link notification for March 10

Disambiguation link notification for March 17

U.S. R&amp;D agencies

Providing sources

Disambiguation link notification for March 24

U.S. R&D agencies