Loading AI tools
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Did you mean to add this to the blacklist, rather than the whitelist? Stifle (talk) 10:33, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
Hello, the User talk:65.240.149.74 keeps trying to put phrases that violate NPOV on the Taiwan article, and keep reverting to his version. As you have already left messages on his talk, maybe you can keep an eye on this? Thanks. T-1000 (talk) 01:38, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
Noted. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 7teven (talk • contribs) 05:26, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
There is something about you on ANI....[] Hell In A Bucket (talk) 16:31, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
Great movie! (as per your user page) Tdinatale (talk) 19:50, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
Hello. I am wondering if you would be so kind as to block 85.139.225.163. He/she keeps blanking an image added/kept based upon consensus. He/she also saw fit to engage in a personal attack on my talk page. Your help would be great. Thank you. Surv1v4l1st (Talk|Contribs) 17:02, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
Hey, I was browsing Wikipedia and received a link telling me that my test had been reverted or something. Thing is, there's nothing telling me exactly what happened, and I don't recall doing any tests. I sometimes correct typos and ask questions on the discussion pages, but I'm not sure exactly what I did that needed reversion. Either there's some obscure editing rule that I broke (that I'd like to know to avoid the issue in the future), or something happened that mixed up my IP with someone else's. Below is the message transcript, which directed me to your talk page.
User talk:71.178.152.14
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Difference between revisions)
Ohnoitsjamie (talk | contribs)
(test 1)
Current revision as of 16:50, 19 June 2007
Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. OhNoitsJamie Talk 16:50, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
So could you clear this up for me? Thanks. TVTMaster (talk) 16:21, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
i feel like something should be done administratively at this point. this person has made enough attempts to promote/spam, with edit warring included. on another note, when there is a lot of spam for something, there is often the lack of notability. i am not sure if this is the case here, exactly. do you think any of the articles involved in Tao Lin could be afd'd? e.g. Eeeee_Eee_Eeee Theserialcomma (talk) 02:32, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
You have asked me not to leave external links to dictionary definitions, even though Wiki has 1000's. I am well aware of all Wiki policies. A dictionary definition obviously adds to'enhances any article, especially for non-native speakers of English that may have an idea of what the subject is about but would undoubtably appreciate a link to the definition. Obviously there would be no point in linking to a untrustworthy definition agregator, so the best thing is a completely free dictionary of note. It is just the two particular subjects you mentioned that you have the problem with? Shane rae (talk) 15:33, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
Thanks Jamie. I think I have clarity here. You are saying to stay away from Google and MTV with dictionary definitions. Message received. Shane rae (talk) 15:44, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
I wasn't finished editing the Attack Attack! page, yet you removed my edit 10 seconds after I posted it. The information entered was accurate. 205.133.193.182 (talk) 21:13, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
Why? The lead singer says that he is pioneering the genre... It is completely relavent and 100% in accordance with wikipedia's policies. Give a legitament reason to remove the content, or I will contest your removal of the information as biased on your part. 205.133.193.182 (talk) 21:38, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
It is not "clear" that it's a joke as you say. It is a distinctive style that the band has adopted from an original joke. The singer even says they are making shirts. How more clear can you get? Here is another interview for your reading pleasure, where all of the band was interviewed: http://www.drivenfaroff.com/2009/07/09/attack-attack-interview/ 205.133.193.182 (talk) 02:00, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
You're interpreting it to fit your opinion. If you walked up to this band and asked if they were crabcore, they would undoubtedly say they are, and that is all that matters. The public decides what genre a band fits into in the end, but in this case both the public and the band support their label as crabcore. If you really wanted to do constructive editing you would tell whoever is putting they are a Christian band in the genre section to stop, because they clearly are not Christian. 205.133.193.182 (talk) 02:23, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
Oh well, maybe in a year or two things will change. Thanks anyways. 205.133.193.182 (talk) 02:59, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
Hi Jamie, I am resurrecting this deleted page Wizfolio. Previously you suggested that the page be deleted. I have updated the page to provide a neutral point of view with additional references from external sources and would like to invite your second opinion. Thank you Kendric Apple (talk) 07:45, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
Re this prod, I pretty much agree the article doesn't belong but alas, there is precedent for it to remain. For example List of Catholic authors, List of Protestant authors, List of Jewish authors, List of Jewish actors, List of Muslim Actors, List of Buddhist writers, List of Christian mystics, List of Jains ...the list of lists goes on... Frank | talk 00:42, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
Good job removing the trivia from Chula Vista, California. These smallish city articles frequently have (well meaning) amateurs adding trivia. --71.111.194.50 (talk) 02:47, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
You deleted my links. I'm not spamming/promoting only providing links to articles/interviews in which the selected people are featured. Please stop deleting them they are very relevant and helpful. Thanks Defrain77 (talk) 21:50, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
I understand your point of view but how else would some body legitimately find out about interviews conducted. I'm just trying to provide information. and we are a non profit anyways we really don't have any interest except for providing information to the public.
Defrain77 (talk) 22:37, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
So if i were to have someone not associated with the show who has no vested interest in the show post the links would that be allowed.
Defrain77 (talk) 23:03, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
How could i get in contact with an established editor to do this for me.
Defrain77 (talk) 23:33, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
I'm sorry that you have to explain this i don't have quite the knowledge you do. sorry for taking up your time. if you do ever have some time maybe you should look into adding some of these links because they are quite informative.
Hello Ohnoitsjamie, this is an automated message from SDPatrolBot to inform you the PROD template you added to List of Catholic Actors/Actresses has been removed. It was removed by DGG with the following edit summary '(Deprodded: Categories and lists are complementary, and there is no reason not to have both.)'. Please consider discussing your concerns with DGG before pursuing deletion further yourself. If you still think the article should be deleted after communicating with the 'dePRODer,' you may want to take part in the article's current AfD. Thank you, SDPatrolBot (talk) 20:45, 24 September 2009 (UTC) (Learn how to opt out of these messages)
As an admin on another wiki I'll say that there was no grounds for speedy deletion of that article it had one third party source from a publication. And an award from a site listed. That made it ineligible for the grounds upon which it was deleted. And from my understanding it could only have been deleted from a normal deletion process. Yes I know where I come from and I warned them of this. But I looked up the reasons specified in the deletion log and they are not even valid in that case. I long have viewed speed deleting without really looking at the page as bad.Matt (talk) 03:39, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
Hi - just a suggestion, (and without trying to second guess you). If it does come to blocking girlofsummer, can I suggest a fairly short block? I get the feeling she genuinely doesn't understand how things work, and a temporary block might actually make her start looking at the messages she's getting. The material she's putting in, although unsourced and POVish, is hardly inflammatory, which makes me think she simply doesn't know how things work here. Her other edits are similar - no ill intent seems to be there.VsevolodKrolikov (talk) 14:52, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
You seem to spend a goodly amount of time keeping various Halloween articles free of, erm, spurious content. Ever think about WP:BOO?--otherlleft 04:00, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
Heya, I was wondering what the difference is between using "bv" and "uw-vandalism#"? When certain reverting and reporting tools such as Huggle see a "bv", how do they treat it in the subsequent warnings? A "bv" template seems to be more strongly worded and better suited for blaitant vandalism, and I think I may start using it myself. Just curious if it would be beneficial or detrimental to those that warned the same user with a tool/add-on. Thanks Gpia7r (talk) 18:30, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
Hi, it seems that you have added an AfD for the aforementioned article; I do agree that it is a PoV fork; but where is the poll? I can't find any in AfD for Sept 30 or 29. Did you miss something in the AfD procedure?
Thanks, Greenleaf (talk) 04:49, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
I had just indef blocked as vandal only, and they had already got an V4 so I removed your additional notice
Hello, the User:74.243.218.94 is trying again to insert stuff that violates NPOV into the Taiwan article. It is the exact the same thing as before, probably one person using different IPs. If you could take care of this it would be great. T-1000 (talk) 23:39, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
Vitamin has been nominated for a good article reassessment. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to good article quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status will be removed from the article. Reviewers' concerns are here.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 02:37, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (talk) 17:17, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
Hi, Suggest me one valid reason why areapal should not be listed as article in wikipedia.Many other social networking sites are having an article and areapal is a platform for knowledge sharing among people from various universities across India. Vatsan34 (talk) 05:02, 4 October 2009 (UTC)Vatsan34
"The content itself has been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent of the site itself. This criterion includes reliable published works in all forms, such as newspaper and magazine articles, books, television documentaries, websites, and published reports by consumer watchdog organizations"..
I have video of television documentary covering the website which benefits for students from India...Shall i start writing the article again?? .. But that video is hosted in youtube... Vatsan34 (talk) 05:27, 5 October 2009 (UTC)Vatsan34
I am just looking for some more information as to why the article, steve chappell, has been deleted. I feel like the issues raised with the article had been addressed in large part. 1. This is a different steve chappell than previous deleted articles. 2. He is notable in his field, maybe in the top 3, highly respected, and 3. the copywrighted material was cited purely as a link to a book he had written, Also it was removed upon concern being raised. An elaboration of your reasoning would be nice. What can be done to reverse this decision? Mortyten (talk) 02:09, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
Wow, that's some fast cleanup on the speedy deletion queue. I'm impressed! WWGB (talk) 13:49, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
Hello, I don't understand why you think my "Investing in Gold" entry on the Gold page was a conflict of interest. I gave a historical time line of the gold bull markets and was going to continue with a paragraph or two on how the current recession has impacted the price of gold. I do not own a mining company nor do I work for one; nor am I an equity analyst or a stock broker. Where is the conflict of interest? Please answer me at your earliest convenience. —Preceding unsigned comment added by TWST48 (talk • contribs) 14:50, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
I am not an employee of The Wall Street Transcript, sorry for the confusion. I add material from the same links because the sourced material in that paragraph comes from the same published interview. Should I just cite at the end of a paragraph rather at the end of each sentence? I am not trying to spam, just cite properly in order to ensure my entries are not deleted (ironically). Please advise. TWST48 (talk) 18:17, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
Why did you delete this page. This man is an accomplished author among many other things. This proves he is notable enough. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.131.129.184 (talk) 11:38, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
Hey Jamie -
Launch Dynamic Media is a very small digital studio, but the services are the same as those offered by the very largest agencies, which have Wikipedia pages. For example - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Razorfish_(company) is one of countless like agencies that have pages. Launch built the first digital wayfinding system of its kind for the Smithsonian which, in my estimation, makes it a notable organization. It simply seems wrong that the largest agencies can have a presence on Wikipedia while the very smallest can not. I would appreciate any additional input you may have.
Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Billcombs (talk • contribs) 13:06, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
Hey Jamie -
EnchantingGoa.com contains Recipes from the State of Goa and I think therefore belongs in External Links under Goan Cuisine http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goan_Catholic_cuisine
These are traditinal recipes not found on any other sites.
Thank you. (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kothrit (talk • contribs)
Sorry we just had an edit conflict on User talk:MessiniaGreece (had taken me quite a while to compose my message), and when I saw your unblock decline I chose to leave in my version rather than yours, just in the interest of being a bit less bitey. I don't know what problem that user thought he had, but I don't think they were deliberately misusing the request. Hope you don't mind. :-) Fut.Perf. ☼ 18:16, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
Dear Jamie,
I don't understand why banned my Article about Clayster?
If you read about for example Google Android or Skype do their articles contain the same content/inforation as I wrote in ours.
I believe it's impossible to write something about a company with promoting it, since explaining what we does in is kind of promotion.
Not even the when I toke away everything beside what Clayster is (Clayster - Interactive Service Delivery Platform) were it OK?
ex from Google Android. Android is a mobile operating system running on the Linux kernel. It allows developers to write managed code in the Java language, controlling the device via Google-developed Java libraries.
Regards
Rikard
Rikard.strid (talk) 17:42, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
OhNoitsJamie Talk Since I'm the CEO and Fonder do I see my self as the must reliable source on mother earth. :) Anyway how to show that the source is the real source then a third-part? Rikard.strid (talk)
Why are you being mean to me? Why are you threatening to block me when I have done nothing wrong?--Daniel L. Barth (talk) 20:35, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
Seamless Wikipedia browsing. On steroids.
Every time you click a link to Wikipedia, Wiktionary or Wikiquote in your browser's search results, it will show the modern Wikiwand interface.
Wikiwand extension is a five stars, simple, with minimum permission required to keep your browsing private, safe and transparent.